Business Park North Muskegon County, MI

Similar documents
Muskegon Waste Water Treatment Site Muskegon County, MI

Decision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement

is attached to and becomes a part of a agreement dated, 20,

Consumers Energy/NRDC Collaboration on a Pilot Project to Defer Investment in a Michigan Substation

IEEE-PES Chicago Chapter Presentation November 11, Smart Grid. Mike Born. Principal Engineer, Capacity Planning

The Capital Grid Project:

TEN YEAR PLANNING GUIDE SHASTA LAKE ELECTRIC UTILITY

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

Contents. Solar Select TM Frequently Asked Questions

7/28/2017. Community Resiliency and Sustainability. David Kang. Vice Chancellor. Infrastructure and Safety PERCEPTION. Photo citation:

CUSTOMER/ TWIN ARROWS PROJECT

Power Infrastructure. PowerToGrowPHX.com

is attached to and becomes a part of a agreement dated, 20

Information Packet Kissimmee Utility Authority Customer-Owned Renewable Generation Interconnection And Net Metering Program

Working through the electric motor replacement maze

Kansas Legislature. Briefing for the. March 6, Paul Suskie & Mike Ross

Michigan Renewable Energy Case Study

R ANCHO C UCAMONGA MUNICIPAL U TILITY

Plug-in Electric Vehicle Program. Wisconsin Public Utility Institute Transportation Fuels Program July 14, 2011

Cost Reflective Tariffs

Joint Con Edison LIPA Offshore Wind Power Integration Project Feasibility Assessment

Power Infrastructure TITLE. David Bentler, Manager, APS Economic Development

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

All of Texas Has Excellent Solar Resources. United States Solar Installed (as of mid 2013): 10 GW Germany Solar Installed (end of 2013): 35.

Building a 21 st Century Electric Grid. February 23, 2018

Clean Cities 101. Dallas-Fort Worth Clean Cities Coalition North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department 1

Summer Reliability Assessment Report Electric Distribution Companies Perspective

Electric Vehicle Charge Ready Program

Tomorrow s Energy Grid

2015 Solar Summit. Jake Wade Net Metering Program Manager

The Past, Present and Future of EV Charging Stations in Holland, MI

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. July 2017

Business Models and Compensation Framework for the Utility Transformation August 16, 2017

Title of presentation

Reasonableness Test RT 015 /11 Salisbury Substation 11kV Feeders

Header. Reasonableness Test RT 007/11 Balhannah & Uraidla 66 / 33 kv Substations. RT Balhannah and Uraidla - Final Draft Page 1 of 8

Helping you get plug-in ready for electric vehicles

SPP OVERVIEW. Mike Ross Senior Vice President, Government Affairs and Public Relations

15 Nelson-Marlborough Regional Plan

The Development of Competitive Renewable Energy Zones in Texas

State Zero-Emission Vehicle Programs Memorandum of Understanding

TRANSFORMING TRANSPORTATION

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

Non-network solutions

Delaware Electric Cooperative. Solar: What You Need to Know

15 Nelson-Marlborough Regional Plan

Customer and Utility Energy Management Fundamentals 101

May 11, Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box Lansing, MI 48909

AEP Ohio Distribution Reliability and Technology Programs

Competitive Electricity Market Concepts and the Role of Regulator

Out of Sight Out of Mind Revisited. EEI Transmission, Distribution, & Metering Conference October 14, 2009 Ken Hall Hall Energy Consulting

Imperial Irrigation District Energy Consumers Advisory Committee Agenda Report

CRYPTOCURRENCY MORATORIUM SMALL MINER RATE IMPACT. September 4, 2018

Utility Distribution Planning 101

City Power Johannesburg: Response to Potential Load Shedding. Presented by : Stuart Webb General Manager : PCM October 2014

(1) Current State and Issues of the Electricity Sector in Indonesia

Flexibility Beyond the hype

Electric Rates. For Michigan customers

Electricity Transmission Infrastructure Development in New England

Solar Project Development in Regulated Markets. Smart and Sustainable Campuses Conference 2017

V2G and V2H The smart future of vehicle-to-grid and vehicle-to-home. September 2016

The Gambia National Forum on

Proposed Incorporation of Merced Irrigation District into ISO Balancing Authority Area in Stakeholder Webconference February 28, 2013

ENERGY STORAGE AS AN EMERGING TOOL FOR UTILITIES TO RESOLVE GRID CONSTRAINTS. June 18, 2015 E2Tech Presentation

Unitil Energy Demand Response Demonstration Project Proposal October 12, 2016

Planning Distributed Generation for Transmission Savings 1 By Kenneth Sahm White and Stephanie Wang 2 March 19, 2014

Electric and Gas Safety. Walt Blackford, Outreach Manager 09 April 2018 Whidbey Island Growers Association

EV - Smart Grid Integration. March 14, 2012

Energy storage - two Canadian Case Studies ESA Annual Conference, Washington, June 4th. Alex Bettencourt Managing Director

EV Strategy. OPPD Board Commitee Presentation May 2018 Aaron Smith, Director Operations

GRID INNOVATION CAUCUS CO-CHAIRS

DFO STATEMENT OF NEED REPORT

TO BOTTOM-LINE BENEFITS

5.6 ENERGY IMPACT DISCUSSION. No Build Alternative

Energy Design Assistance

EUROPEAN MANUFACTURER OPENS NEW HIGH-TECH FACILITY IN ARKANSAS TO SERVE PLAINS & EASTERN CLEAN LINE

American Electric Power s Energy Storage Deployments

CHAPTER 25. SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS.

City of Lethbridge ELECTRIC UTILITY. Electric Distribution Tariff Rate Schedule

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

NATIONAL CONFERENCE of STATE LEGISLATURES. October 9 th, 2009 Ervan Hancock

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

ALZ Electrical Solar Consumer Guide

Precision Station Stopping Progress Update

California Energy Storage Policies. Carla Peterman Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission December 2016

The Electrification Futures Study: Transportation Electrification

Municipal fleets and plug-in vehicles in Indianapolis

ENERGY MANAGEMENT 4/22/2014. What are your approximate yearly energy costs? (Electricity, natural gas, etc.)

RIBBON CUT ON DETROIT EDISON SOLAR INSTALLATION AT MCCC

O&M Requirements for Utility-Scale Solar PV and Energy Storage. Nicholas Jewell, Ph.D., PMP Sr. Research Engineer Research & Development LG&E and KU

Measuring the Smartness of the Electricity Grid

The Swedish Government Inquiry on Smart Grids

Renewable Energy System Tariffs and Pricing

INCENTIVIZING ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE PURCHASES IN VERMONT

Brownfields to Brightfields

SPP Notification to Construct with Conditions

Utility and project update 2-3 Project description 4

ATTACHMENT 14 RESOLUTION NO. 5888(14) Supersedes Schedule NEM of Resolution No. 5592(09) Schedule NEM NET ENERGY METERING

Yukon s Independent Power Production Policy

Evolving our Customer Relationship: Edison SmartConnect Programs & Services Mark Podorsky, Sr. Manager Business Design

Transcription:

Business Park North Muskegon County, MI OVERVIEW January 1, 2017 CONTACT US Scott Corrin, Economic Development Manager 517-374-2248 scott.corrin@cmsenergy.com Consumers Energy Business Center 800-805-0490 ConsumersEnergy.com/businessmatters

Michigan Business Park North Muskegon County, MI Muskegon

At Consumers Energy, we re committed to providing information to help you make sound business decisions. We strive to meet and exceed your expectations and champion the success of your business in Michigan. This Energy Ready profile is our assessment of this site s energy potential. You ll find details about the site s existing energy infrastructure, and estimated costs to adjust the site s features based on how your business plans to use energy. We hope you ll find it useful as you evaluate and make decisions about this site s potential for your business. To help us deliver more precise cost estimates, we would like to learn more about how your business uses energy. Specifically: Electricity Diversified peak demand in megawatts (MW) annual electricity use in kilowatt hours (kwh) Hours of operation I would appreciate the opportunity to learn more about your project, understand your long-term plans and find sites that meet your unique needs. Contact me directly at 517-374-2248 or scott.corrin@cmsenergy.com. Sincerely, Scott Corrin Economic Development Manager ~ 3 ~

ENERGY READY SITE OVERVIEW SITE ADVANTAGES Low voltage distribution available, up to 3.0 MW High voltage distribution from 3.0 MW to 100 MW Energy efficiency and construction incentives available High voltage electric and natural gas service reliability Construction timelines tailored to your needs ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CONSUMERS ENERGY Energy Rate Estimates We ll estimate your electric and natural gas costs and offer energy-intensive rate options with your growth plans in mind. Engineering Service Estimates We ll estimate your costs to re-engineer sites based on how your business uses energy. Utility Infrastructure Mapping Our maps show you where pipes and wires lie, and can help service providers understand how to serve your site. Site-Specific Engineering Information Our Energy Ready site inventory is backed by our strong relationships with local community agencies. CONTACT Scott Corrin 530 West Willow Street Lansing, MI 48906 517-374-2248 Scott.corrin@cmsenergy.com COUNTY OF MUSKEGON Jonathan Wilson Hall of Justice, 4 th Floor 990 Terrace Street Muskegon, MI 49442 231-724-8861 WilsonJo@co.muskegon.mi.us New Construction and Energy Efficiency Incentives We offer rebates for energy-efficient equipment and buildings, and help you reduce or eliminate upfront energy infrastructure costs. ~ 4 ~

ELECTRIC LOW VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION Ideal Load Range: Up to 3 MW 46kV to 7.2/12.47kV Distribution (existing) Project Location ~3.3 mi Existing 7.2/12.47kV distribution New Primary Service Connection Options: Costs for Electric Service Option Lead Time 3 New Right of Way Required 4 Project Cost Maximum Electric Demand Consumers Energy Construction Incentive Customer Contribution Base Service Single 7.2/12.47kV line from existing distribution system Base Service Single 7.2/12.47kV line from existing distribution system 3 months Minimal $50,000 1.5 MW $50,000 $0 1 6-9 months Minimal $300,000 3.0 MW $300,000 $0 2 1. A 1 year full service contract for 1.5 MW or more of demand at CVL3 and rate GPD will provide the construction incentive shown. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Additional base service options may be available or required at this site depending on electric demand and load characteristics. 2. A 1 year full service contract for 3.0 MW or more of demand at CVL3 and rate GPD will provide the construction incentive shown. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Additional base service options may be available or required at this site depending on electric demand and load characteristics. 3. All estimates and lead times are conceptual and could be higher. Actual costs, timing and customer contribution will be determined during development of the contract for facilities. 4. Represents new third party right of way. Consumers Energy will require that the customer provide easements for all lines and facilities located on the customer property. ~ 5 ~

ELECTRIC HIGH VOLTAGE (46 kv) Ideal Load Range: 3 MW to 5 MW 46 kv ~ 11 miles 46 kv New ~ 0.3 miles new 46 kv Line ~ 5.5 miles 46 kv Distribution Service Options: Costs for Electric Service if Electric Demand is at least 3 MW Option Lead Time 3 New Right of Way Required 6 Project Cost Electric Demand Practical Maximum Demand 7 Consumers Energy Construction Incentive Customer Contribution Base Service - 46 kv Line Only (customer builds/ owns substation) 12-18 months Minimal $ 200,000 3 MW 5 MW $ 200,000 1 $ 0 1 Base Service Single 46 kv Line and Single Transformer 12-18 months Minimal $ 1.6 million 3.8 MW 5 MW $ 1.6 million 2 $ 0 2 46 kv Line Reliability for Base Service Options: Predicted Momentary Interruption Rate 4,5 Predicted Extended Outage Rate 4,5 Predicted Reliability % 5 1 every 1.9 years 1 every 5.8 years 99.996% 1. A 5 year full service contract for 3 MW or more of demand at CVL2 and rate GPD will provide a construction incentive sufficient to cover the cost of typical base facilities at this site. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Additional base service options may be available or required at this site depending on electric demand and load characteristics. 2. A 5 year full service contract for 3.8 MW or more of demand at CVL2 and rate GPD will provide a construction incentive sufficient to cover the cost of typical base facilities at this site. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Additional base service options may be available or required at this site depending on electric demand and load characteristics. 3. All estimates and lead times are conceptual and could be higher. Actual costs, timing and customer contribution will be determined during development of the contract for facilities. 4. Momentary Interruption is defined as an interruption or series of interruptions lasting no more than five minutes. Extended Outage is defined as an outage lasting longer than five minutes. 5. Outage rates are based upon system average outage rates for 46 kv lines only, and the predicted reliability % represents the estimated amount of time the facility is in service. 6. Represents new third party right of way. Consumers Energy will require that the customer provide easements for all lines and facilities located on the customer property. 7. This represents the maximum demand that can be practically served from the respective option with minimal system upgrades. Greater demands will be considered with additional analysis. ~ 6 ~

ELECTRIC HIGH VOLTAGE (138 kv) Ideal Load Range: 5 MW to 100 MW 138 kv 138 kv ~ 11.5 miles ~4 miles ~ 11.5 miles ~4 miles ~ 1.6 miles new 138 kv Line New 138 kv ~ 3.2 miles new 138 kv Line New 138 kv 138 kv BASE SERVICE CONNECTION OPTION 138 kv REDUNDANT SERVICE CONNECTION OPTION Connection Options: Costs for Electric Service if Electric Demand is at least 5 MW Option Base Service - 138 kv Line Only (customer builds/owns substation) Base Service Single 138 kv Line and Single Transformer Redundant Service two 138 kv Lines and Two Transformer Lead Time 4 18-24 months 18-24 months New Right of Way Required 7 Project Cost Electric Demand Practical Maximum Demand 8 Consumers Energy Construction Incentive Customer Contribution 1.6 Miles $ 900,000 5 MW 100 MW $ 900,000 1 $ 0 1 1.6 Miles 24 months 3.2 Miles $ 2.8 million $8.6 million 7.9 MW 100 MW $ 2.8 million 2 $ 0 2 20.7 MW 100 MW $7.4 million 3 $1.2 million 3 138 kv Line Reliability for Base Service Options: Predicted Momentary Interruption Rate 5,6 Predicted Extended Outage Rate 5,6 Predicted Reliability % 6 1 every 3.6 years 1 every 13.9 years 99.998% 1. A 5 year full service contract for 5 MW or more of demand at CVL1 and rate GPD will provide a construction incentive sufficient to cover the cost of typical base facilities at this site. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Additional base service options may be available or required at this site depending on electric demand and load characteristics. 2. A 5 year full service contract for 7.9 MW or more of demand at CVL1 and rate GPD will provide a construction incentive sufficient to cover the cost of typical base facilities at this site. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Additional base service options may be available or required at this site depending on electric demand and load characteristics. 3. A 5 year full service contract for 20.7 MW or more of demand at CVL1 and rate GPD will provide a construction incentive sufficient to cover the cost of typical base and redundant facilities at this site. Refer to Tariff C1.4. Customer contribution is required for 35 year present worth of annual ownership charges for redundant facilities. 4. All estimates and lead times are conceptual and could be higher. Actual costs, timing and customer contribution will be determined during development of the contract for facilities. 5. Momentary Interruption is defined as an interruption or series of interruptions lasting no more than five minutes. Extended Outage is defined as an outage lasting longer than five minutes. 6. Outage rates are based upon system average outage rates for 138 kv lines only, and the predicted reliability % represents the estimated amount of time the facility is in service. 7. Represents new third party right of way. Consumers Energy will require that the customer provide easements for all lines and facilities located on the customer property. 8. This represents the maximum demand that can be practically served from the respective option with minimal system upgrades. Greater demands will be considered with additional analysis. ~ 7 ~

EXISTING FACILITIES All existing facility locations are approximate and not to be used for construction purposes. Always contact MISS DIG 811 before you dig. ~ 8 ~

Developed by Consumers Energy, in collaboration with: