The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Similar documents
Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Creating High Performance Transportation: aligning revenues, incentives, & system management to secure better mobility with less pollution

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Clearing Existing Freeway Bottlenecks with Fast and Intertwined Regular Networks: Costs, Benefits and Revenues

Congestion Charging - An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

A New Public-Private Partnership Model for Road Pricing Implementation

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Maximizing Public Benefits from Toll Facilities with Congestion-Based Tolls

Measuring Accessibility. Andrew Owen Director, Accessibility Observatory May 17, 2017

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Estimating the Benefits from Mileage-based Vehicle Insurance, Taxes and Fees

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Emerging Technologies & Autonomous Vehicle Readiness Planning. Georgia Planning Association Conference Jekyll Island, GA September 5, 2018

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

The Status of Transportation Funding, Road Charge and Vehicle Miles Traveled in California

Transportation Challenges

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Redefining Mobility. Randy Iwasaki. Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority January 18, 2018

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

The hidden prices of parking David King Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University

NRG evgo. Arun Banskota President NRG evgo

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

The Green Dividend. Cities facilitate less driving, saving money and stimulating the local economy. Joseph Cortright, Impresa September 2007

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT. Residents enjoying the newly opened Brickell City Centre on Nov. 3, 2016.

House Committee on Transportation Policy Public Hearing HB April 5, 2017

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Planning of the HSR Network

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

Emerging international best practices to promote electric vehicles

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Paid Parking Pilot Program Parking Management

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

Getting Parking Right in Emerging Mixed Use Environments

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

I-405 Corridor Master Plan

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Draft Results and Open House

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

IMPROVING CITIES THROUGH PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS. Toronto Forum For Global Cities December 2008

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Implementation of Future Transportation Technologies: Getting Beyond the Low Hanging Fruit without Chopping Down the Tree

Contents. Executive Summary...1 Introduction...2 Operating Plan...4 System Connectivity...5

San Francisco Transportation Plan

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

Trip and Parking Generation Data Collection at Grocery Store with Gas Station and Auto Repair

car2go Toronto Proposal for on-street parking pilot project

San Francisco Mobility, Access & Pricing Study

The Future is Bright! So how do we get there? Council of State Governments West Annual Meeting August 18, 2017

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Draft Results and Recommendations

Multi-Family Recycling

Transportation Demand Management Element

Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

Business Leadership on Transportation in the Triangle

Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP)

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Road charging in Belgium: state of play

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

APTA 2CA0le1 nd 7 Ar

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

VEHICLE TOLLING & MANAGEMENT. By: Julian Holtzman, Dan Moser, and Whitney Schroeder

Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Data Collection at Mini-Mart with Gas Station

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. AAPA Annual Convention

Smart Cities Around the Country

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Mobility 2045 Plan Workshop

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

The RoadMAP to ELectric Vehicle Adoption. Model policies and programs to accelerate EV adoption at the state and local level.

Transcription:

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management Patrick DeCorla-Souza, AICP Federal Highway Administration Presentation at Congestion Pricing Discovery Workshop Los Angeles, CA June 27, 2008

Overview Why congestion pricing? Congestion pricing examples US DOT s congestion pricing program

Why Congestion Pricing? Tolling Purpose to generate revenue Flat tolls Congestion pricing Purpose to manage demand Tolls vary Results in a range of benefits

1. Economic Efficiency Costs of highway use: Internal vehicle operation costs External congestion, pollution, accidents, climate change Drivers not faced with external costs Leads to overuse, congestion, and increased social costs

Construction Costs for Adding Urban Freeway Lanes vs. Gas Tax Per mile For 10- mile trip For 20-mile round trip Construction cost/ lane $15 M. $150 M. $300 M. Daily traffic volume in peak periods (5-6 hours/day) 10,000 vehicles 10,000 vehicles 10,000 vehicles Const. cost per vehicle $1,500 $15,000 $30,000 Gas tax per vehicle $0.02 $0.20 $0.20 Present value of gas taxes paid over 30 years $62 $620 $1,240

How Congestion Pricing Works Variable toll reflects actual marginal social cost Some will shift to using substitutes Transit Carpool Travel at less busy times Telework

2. System Efficiency

Bottleneck on I-405 Northbound

5-minute volumes and speeds on bottleneck on I-405 northbound Time Speed VMT Volume 6:00am 59 4683 511 6:20am 52 4969 543 6:45am 36 4564 498 7:10am 7:45am 9:15am 6:00am 6:20am 6:45am 7:10am 7:45am 31 23 4180 3632 456 396 9:15am 32 4149 453 Performance decreases with high travel demand: 56% drop in speed 27% drop in throughput

Vehicle Throughput on I-405 6000 September 10, 2007 UnCongested VMT Congested VMT Failure VMT 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 VMT 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

Aggregate System-Level Delay 5000 Sep. 10 2007(Worst Monday) Oct. 8 2007 (Columbus Monday) 4500 4000 AM Peak 47.7% 3500 3000 PM Peak 37.1% 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Entire Day 39.4% 0 Hours of Delay for Entire Network 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Delay per Vehicle per Mile Sep. 10 2007(Worst Monday) Oct. 8 2007 (Columbus Monday) Minutes of Delay per Vehicle per Mile 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Sep. 10 2007 (Worst Monday) AM Peak PM Peak Entire Day 4.1 Minutes 3.0 Minutes 1.7 Minutes Oct. 8 2007 (Columbus Monday) 2.1 Minutes 1.8 Minutes 1.1 Minutes % Change 49% 40% 35%

System-Level Benefits A 3.2% reduction in AM peak period demand on Columbus Day results in: 39% reduction in aggregate daily delay (all vehicles) 35% decrease in minutes of delay per vehicle per mile Roughly the same total system VMT (i.e., vehicle throughput)

3. Market Signals for Investment Congestion-based toll rates measure people s willingness to pay and value they place on the service High toll rates signal the need for investment in additional capacity Leads to efficient level of investment

4. New Travel Options Pricing stimulates the development of viable alternatives: Transit better service reliability and frequency, may be financed by toll revenues Carpooling/vanpooling monetary incentives to share the ride Employers encouraged to offer telecommuting/ flexible hours

Summary of Benefits Congestion pricing achieves: 1. Economic efficiency 2. System efficiency 3. Market signals for investment 4. New travel options

Other Benefits New source of funding Environmental benefits Energy savings Long-term growth in GDP Allows fine-tuning to maximize use of limited capacity

Overview Why congestion pricing? Congestion pricing examples US DOT s congestion pricing programs

Managed Lanes San Diego Minneapolis Houston Denver Seattle Salt Lake City

Graduated Toll Rates: San Diego Evening Period Northbound $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.75 3:00-3:30 3:30-4:00 4:00-4:30 4:30-5:00 5:00-5:30 5:30-6:00 6:00-6:30 6:30-7:00 Maximum Toll Schedule for I-15 HOT Lanes, San Diego, California

Managed Highways

Tolls Rates on Singapore Expressways Toll rates Increase 45 kph 65 kph Decrease Charges vary from 50 cents to $2.50

Cordon Pricing - Stockholm

Stockholm Cordon

Stockholm Toll Rates

Overview Why congestion pricing? Congestion pricing examples US DOT s congestion pricing programs: Projects underway Studies

USDOT Pricing Programs Since 1991: Congestion Pricing and Value Pricing Pilots: More than 70 funded projects Since 2005: HOT Lanes and Express Lanes programs Urban Partnership Agreements (UPA) 27 applicants, 4 funded Congestion Reduction Demonstration (CRD) 30 applicants, 2 funded

UPA and CRD Programs Direct user charges that vary with level of demand Support strategies: Transit Technology: Multimodal traveler information Active traffic management and operations

Urban Partners Seattle Minneapolis -St. Paul San Francisco Chicago Los Angeles Miami

Urban Partners Managed Lanes: Miami: Convert HOV-2 to HOT-3 Minneapolis: Shoulder to HOT-2 Los Angeles: HOV-3 and HOV-2 to HOT-3

Urban Partners Managed Highways: Seattle: Convert free bridge to variably tolled San Francisco: Convert free road to variably tolled Area Pricing: Chicago: Variably priced curb parking in CBD San Francisco: Variably priced parking in CBD

Recent Studies

HOT Network in Washington DC Annual revenue: $1.5 to $2.8 billion annually Capital cost recovery: 43% to 48%

Pricing All Roads in Seattle, WA Present value of revenues = $87 B

Area Pricing in New York City Annual net revenue: $500 million Dedicated to transit

Freeway Network Pricing Los Angeles Metropolitan Area 6.0 Annual toll revenue: $5.5 B 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 Current fuel tax 1.0 receipts: Metro area = $1.9 B 0.0 Revenue Fuel tax Billion dollars annually * Source: Transportation Research Board Paper 08-0182

Public Opinion Surveys Managed Lanes: 60-70% approval from all income groups Managed Highways: Seattle: 64-74% approval for new tolls on currently free SR 520 bridge Area Pricing: New York City: 60% approval (67% approval in City Council vote)

Summary Congestion pricing has many benefits Operates successfully worldwide Bold and innovative projects are underway in several U.S. cities Studies suggest promise in addressing funding shortfalls Public opinion can be positive when packaged with travel alternatives

For more information contact: Patrick DeCorla-Souza Federal Highway Administration 202-366-4076 Patrick.decorla-souza@dot.gov www.fightgridlocknow.gov