S06 Update 7th SHRP 2 Safety Research Symposium Washington, DC July 12, Driving Transportation with Technology VTTI 7/12/2012 1

Similar documents
Background. Speed Prediction in Work Zones Using the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data

Naturalistic Driving Assessments of Driver Distraction and Fatigue

Overview of the Canada NDS and the Canada Truck NDS

Yang Zheng, Amardeep Sathyanarayana, John H.L. Hansen

EDR Report Information

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

Camera-based Active Real-Time Driver Monitoring Systems

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version 1) December 2018

Innovative Technology in Construction and Work Zone Safety

Crashworthiness Evaluation. Roof Strength Test Protocol (Version III)

NHTSA Update: Connected Vehicles V2V Communications for Safety

Stan Caldwell Executive Director Traffic21 Institute Carnegie Mellon University

Enhanced Interlock Technology

An Investigation of the Distribution of Driving Speeds Using In-vehicle GPS Data. Jianhe Du Lisa Aultman-Hall University of Connecticut

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019

SHRP 2 RID. Roadway Information Database

e-cfr Data is current as of October 31, 2012

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC); Public Meeting

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

Fatigue in Winter Maintenance Operations

Silent Danger Zone for Highway Users

Our Approach to Automated Driving System Safety. February 2019

Új technológiák a közlekedésbiztonság jövőjéért

DD2-PRO+ Gps enabled Datalogger & display system mm (W) x 90mm (H) x 28mm (D) Datalogger Front 109mm (W) x 35mm (H) x 121mm (D) Datalogger Back

Collect similar information about disengagements and crashes.

United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 Part 563

Comparing G-Force Measurement Between a Smartphone App and an In-Vehicle Accelerometer

Super Squadron technical paper for. International Aerial Robotics Competition Team Reconnaissance. C. Aasish (M.

TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016

Regulatory Parking Signs Inventory and Parking Space Count RFP

Northeast Autonomous and Connected Vehicle Summit

CT6 SUPER CRUISE Convenience & Personalization Guide. cadillac.com

Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)

Energy ITS: What We Learned and What We should Learn

UAE Ministry of Interior pilot project for RFID-based SCHOOLBUS/STUDENT TRACKING SYSTEM

V2V Advancements in the last 12 months. CAMP and related activities

Preliminary Study of the Response of Forward Collision Warning Systems to Motorcycles

Asset Class 2019 Target 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target 2023 Target REVENUE VEHICLES AB - Articulated Bus N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard

IIHS activities on alcohol-impaired driving

Insert the title of your presentation here. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

SEGMENT 2 DRIVER EDUCATION Risk Awareness

VENDOR INFORMATION AND SERVICES

Inventory of Best Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education

STATUS OF NHTSA S EJECTION MITIGATION RESEARCH. Aloke Prasad Allison Louden National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

Force Control for Machining applications. With speakers notes

TEST SUMMARY AND FRAMEWORK TEST SUMMARY

18th ICTCT Workshop, Helsinki, October Technical feasibility of safety related driving assistance systems

CRSM: Crowdsourcing based Road Surface Monitoring

Procedure for assessing the performance of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in front-to-rear collisions

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

Gleason Phoenix 450 Project

Washington, DC. Joseph. S. Carra, Director. Integration of Vehicle safety National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Jurisdictional Guidelines for the Safe Testing and Deployment of Highly Automated Vehicles. Developed by the Autonomous Vehicles Working Group

RAILROAD PREEMPTION FORMS. Mark Johnson, P.E.

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

Videosystem CAR-READER

1. Check the contents of the installation kit

UA Road Transport Safety. Rollover Bowtie

The older driver crash picture: trends and factors

Microgeneration Installation Standard: MCS

SUBARU STARLINK YOUR SUBARU CONNECTED Safety & Security OWNER S MANUAL. Love. It s what makes a Subaru, a Subaru. MY16StarlinkS&S_OMportrait.

NTSB Recommendations to Reduce Speeding-Related Crashes

CT6 SUPER CRUISE Convenience & Personalization Guide. cadillac.com

Naturalistic Research on Powered Two-Wheelers. Martin Winkelbauer (KFV) Martin Donabauer (KFV) Alexander Pommer (KFV) Reinier Jansen (SWOV)

Automated Commercial Motor Vehicles: Potential Driver and Vehicle Safety Impacts

Smart Grids from the perspective of consumers IEA DSM Workshop

Georgia Pacific Crossett Operations Hydrogen Sulfide and Meteorological Monitoring Program

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

HCSIS, Independent Monitoring for Quality (IM4Q) - Considerations. Date: 07/20/2011

Lane Departure Warning Systems. Lane Departure Warning Systems Webinar. Tuesday, March 20, :00 a.m. 12:30 p.m. Presentations.

Development of California Regulations for Testing and Operation of Automated Driving Systems

Course Code: Bendix Wingman Fusion System Overview Study Guide

Citi's 2016 Car of the Future Symposium

Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions Implications for Transport Planning

Commercial Interlock. Debra Coffey Vice President of Government Affairs Stephen George Director of Commercial Business

Electric Vehicle Charging Management Solution Accelerating the Deployment of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructures

Functional Safety Analysis of Automated Vehicle Lane Centering Control Systems. Volpe The National Transportation Systems Center

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING ASSESSMENT SERVICES. January 10, 2011 Presentation to Arvada City Council

Erin Kelley 1 Gregory Lane 1 David Schönholzer 2 Wagacha Peter Waiganjo 3. CEGA Conference on Infrastructure Monitoring, October 2016

Status of the review of the General Safety and Pedestrian Safety Regulations

P1 - Public summary report

DICOUNT- Distraction and Inattention COUNTermeasures

I-95 Corridor-wide safety data analysis and identification of existing successful safety programs. Traffic Injury Research Foundation April 22, 2010

The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard. John D. Courtis August 10-12, 2009

MiX 2310i with IP Housing. P r o d u c t I n f o r m a t i o n G u i d e

ADTSEA 3.0 Driver Education Curriculum Outline

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Location Tool and Visualization Map. July 17, 2018

TOTAL FLEET TRANSPARENCY.

Performance and Development Review Scheme

AGENDA INTERCITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION January 20, :30 P.M. 1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1 min.

Women In Transportation Seminar The Future of Transportation How Do We Get There. US Department of Transportation NHTSA Julie J Kang

Certain Model Year Tacoma 2TR-FE Vehicles Exhaust Pipe Replacement for Catalytic Converter

Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences

Group 3 Final Project Paper

Using Fleet Safety Programs to Impact Crash Frequency and Severity Session # S772

Transcription:

S06 Update 7th SHRP 2 Safety Research Symposium Washington, DC July 12, 2012 1

Executive Overview: Original NDS Targets Largest Naturalistic Driving Study Ever Undertaken ca. 3,100 primary drivers, all age/gender groups. ca. 3,900 data years; 2.5M trip files 2 years of data collection some participants for 1 year, some for 2 years Vehicle Types: All light vehicles including Passenger Cars Minivans SUVs Pickup Trucks 450 DAS Advanced technology vehicles Six data collection sites Integration w/ detailed roadway information (S04) Data useful for next generation of researchers 300 DAS 150 DAS 2

Executive Overview: Progress Update Operational Sites Vehicles on Road Completed Participants Data Drives Ingested Trip Files in DB2 Database Sum 10 0 0 0 0 0 Sum 11 6 600 0 200 60,792 Sum 12 6 1,844 278 4,564 383,775 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Passenger Car SUV / Crossover Pickup Truck Van / Minivan 3

S06 Role: Current Focus Areas Study Oversight Reporting & Provision of Study Planning Support to TRB Inventory Management & Reconciliation Data Quality Assurance Installation Guidance Shakedown Process Periodic DAS Health Checks Manual Quality Inspection of Ingested Data Issue Management & Support S07 Support Ongoing Provisioning of DAS Kits & Parts RMA Triage and Manufacturer Warranty Service Leading weekly S06-S07-TRB Project Meetings Leading Quarterly Installer Meetings Cell Data Study IRB Issue Management Dashboard Website 4

Study Oversight 5

Recruiting Summary 6

Inventory Tracking Protocol Boxes scanned as they arrive / depart a location Parts scanned as they are installed / de-installed Scan data populate the database Database snapshot: NextGens as of 7/6/2012 7

Vehicle Months Collected & Projected 8

Data Quality Assurance 9

Data Intake and Quality Control Process: Health Check Health Check periodic DAS self-assessment and transmission of results via cellular M2M communication to S06 server Health Check Data 96% of vehicles communicating Main Benefits Detecting non-communicating vehicles Detecting near full data drives 10

High Level Data Flow Diagram Data Drive 11

Data Drives Ingested - Cumulative 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 7/25/2011 8/25/2011 9/25/2011 10/25/2011 11/25/2011 12/25/2011 1/25/2012 2/25/2012 3/25/2012 12

Database Ingestion Checkpoint Data are brought into an S06 staging database Before data are transferred to a production (i.e., analysis) database, they undergo a quality control process Questionable/Bad data are stored on an exceptions database Allows for recovery, as needed 13

Quality Control Checks Data Stream Detection sensor problem or failure Boundary Exceptions Sensor malfunctions Calibration problems Unit conversion issue Variable Interdependencies - variables believed to have a problem based on their relationship to another variable 14

Example Quality Metrics (6/21/12) Manual Data QA Data Ingestion Data Item Value % Files manually reviewed for QA 19,218 Vehicles reviewed using in-house data 1,326 93.84% Sold State Drives (SSD) ingested 4,168 Number of sites using slurpers 6 100.00% S06/S07 Coordination Vehicles with SSD exceeding 70% full 251 13.13% SSD available for install at S07's 236 Vehicles with battery drainage issues 1 0.05% Vehicles installed last week 16 0.84% Vehicles scheduled for maintenance 390 20.40% Number of known crashes 49 Vehicles reached data transfer limit 0 0.00% Vehicles on the road 1,912 98.05% Primary Participants (Installed + Completed) 2,102 67.81% Vehicle Months Collected 17,081 15

S07 Support 16

General Support Leading weekly meetings including S06, S07s, and TRB staff Leading quarterly installer meetings Support of participant management issues (e.g., crash video requests, payment requests, etc.) Project Wiki & Digest 17

RMA & Provisioning Managing DAS kit repair process triage at repair at or at ACDI, as appropriate Provisioning of parts to S07s based on a weekly update of: Current and expected shelf inventory Reported install & maintenance schedules 18

Issue Tracking Summary 19

Cellphone Usage Follow On Study working with key stakeholders to establish processes: TRB & NHTSA FCC & CTIA Top 4 carriers (AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon) Establishing Study Documents Informed Consent (between & Participants) Permission to Access Records (between Participants & Carriers) NDA / Memo of Understanding (between & Carriers) Have secured VT & NAS IRB protocol approvals Working with each carrier to establish secure information & data transmission practices 20

Institutional Review Board (IRB) & Related Overview 8 IRBs involved (6 for ongoing reviews) NAS + VT + Each of the data collection contractors (S07s) Two S07s have opted to rely on VT IRB Two submission packets: Overall Study 14 amendments, so far (1 in process) Recruitment 14 amendments, so far (1 in process) Why so many amendments? Continual efforts to: Maximize collection of desired data & crashes (i.e., by extending certain participants) Dealing with issues (e.g., video requests) 21

SHRP 2 NDS Dashboard Website Goal: Provide high level snapshot of key data for stakeholders and researchers for status & study planning Update 1. Develop automated code to generate data summaries. This is fairly within reach and underway. 2. Develop website framework that would receive the output in a standard format (e.g., JPEGs). 3. Establish a development website and confirm populating it is feasible each week without large labor effort 4. Obtain feedback from key stakeholders Incorporate improvements 5. Migrate to production 22

Number of Vehicles 23

Number of Trips 24

Mileage 25

Total Time (Hrs) 26

Trips Day of the Week 27

Frequency # of files Driving Time per Trip Histogram 120,000 100,000 98,952 31.6% 80,000 69,788 22.3% 60,000 43,567 13.9% 40,000 28,176 9.0% 20,000 0 14,435 4.6% 17,571 5.6% 11,749 3.8% 7,486 2.4% 4,987 1.6% 3,451 1.1% 2,567 1,867 2,968 869 649 542 450 349 317 264 242 1,807 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 More Minutes 28

What Questions Do You Have? 29

Supplemental Slides if/as Needed 30

Original Experimental Design Gender: Age Range Description One Two DAS Primary Data-Years Age Range Year Years units Participants M 16-17 Minor Teen 72 28 100 172 200 M 18-20 Adult Teen 72 28 100 172 200 M 21-25 Young Adult 72 28 100 172 200 M 26-35 Adult 72 28 100 172 200 M 36-50 Middle Adult 72 28 100 172 200 M 51-65 Mature Adult 72 28 100 172 200 M 66-75 Younger Older Driver 72 28 100 172 200 M 76+ Older Older Driver 72 28 100 172 200 F 16-17 Minor Teen 72 28 100 172 200 F 18-20 Adult Teen 72 28 100 172 200 F 21-25 Young Adult 72 28 100 172 200 F 26-35 Adult 72 28 100 172 200 F 36-50 Middle Adult 72 28 100 172 200 F 51-65 Mature Adult 72 28 100 172 200 F 66-75 Younger Older Driver 72 28 100 172 200 F 76+ Older Older Driver 72 28 100 172 200 Any Advanced Vehicle 0 350 350 350 700 Technology Totals: new totals 1,152 798 1,950 3,102 3,900 original totals 1,152 798 1,950 3,102 3,900 31

Data Acquisition System Overview Head Unit Forward Radar & License Assembly Main Unit: NextGen 32

DAS Data Captured Multiple Videos Machine Vision Eyes Forward Monitor Lane Tracker Accelerometer Data (3 axis) Rate Sensors (3 axis) GPS Latitude, Longitude, Elevation, Time, Velocity Forward Radar X and Y positions X and Y Velocities Cellular M2M Communications ACN, health checks, location notification Remote upgrades Illuminance sensor Infrared illumination Passive alcohol sensor Incident push button Audio (only on incident push button) Turn signals Vehicle network data Accelerator Brake pedal activation ABS Gear position Steering wheel angle Speed Seat Belt Information Airbag deployment 33

Camera Views 34 34

Camera Image Samples Forward View - color 15 Hz continuous video 640x320 pixels Driver Face Rotated for max pixel efficiency Right-Rear View Center stack Pedal Interactions Mask Periodic still cabin image, permanently blurred for passenger anonymity 35 35

Custom Hardware: Installation, Calibration & Ingestion Vehicle Alignment Radar and Panel Radar Alignment Fixture Head Unit Alignment Fixture 36

Hands-on Installer Training at 37

Accelerometer & Rate Sensors Acceleration (buffered @ 500 Hz for incident recording; 10 Hz continuous) Lateral Longitudinal Vertical Gyro yaw rate (buffered @ 100 Hz for incident recording; 10 Hz continuous) 38 38

Forward Radar (10 20 Hz) Minimum of 5 objects tracked Target vehicle range Target vehicle range rate Target vehicle orientation relative to participating vehicle Track type 39 39

GPS (1 Hz) GPS time Latitude Longitude Altitude Velocity (X, Y, Z) Status (number of satellites being tracked) 40 40