SASKATCHEWAN SUNFLOWER COMMITTEE CO-OPERATIVE TRIALS TEST RESULTS

Similar documents
AGR APPENDIX. Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting. Crop: Type:

Test Weight. Plant Height**

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Height, Yield and Oil Content of Short-Stature Sunflower (Helianthus annus) vs. Conventional Height Sunflower in the Southern High Plains

INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS.

Request for Support for Registration of SR420

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

Potato Variety Trials

INFORMED SEEDING DECISIONS.

REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF REGISTRATION OF BW423

Sunflower Hybrids. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1024

2004 Spring Barley Variety Release and Recommendation Motions

LEAST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE

FUNDED BY GROWERS FOR GROWERS SMALL PLOT AND FIELD SCALE DATA

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Data 2-Year Average 3 Rank Yield 1 Wt Ht Lodg.

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg.

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Georgetown Dagsboro* Marydel** Middletown***

Sclerotinia Head Rot and Sunflower Hybrids

AFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5

2017 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results

2014 Specialty Crop Report

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014

Sunflower Hybrids. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1006

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.

Varietal Trials Results January 2011

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

WFTEST: The Western Forage Testing System Report 2003

Corn Yield Trials 2012

Sunflower Hybrids. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 989

Triticale and Rye Forage

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

2013 Minnesota Corn Performance Trials

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SPRING SMALL GRAINS

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

2008 Performance of spring wheat varieties in central Montana. By Dave Wichman

National Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017

Roundup Ready Trial Page 12

PROJECT TITLE: Statewide durum yield trial - Evaluation of durum varieties and experimental lines in Montana 2013 (4W4145)

2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

HARVEST U.S. PACIFIC NORTHWEST. Soft White Wheat Quality Report

PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH REGISTERING HYBRID RAPE VARIETIES. J.E. Ramsbottom, R.J. Jarman and S.P.J. Kightley

Tifton, Georgia: Dryland Soybean Variety Performance, 2013

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

2016 PEI Cereal Guide

Economics and Yield of Dry Bean Market Classes

OILSEED CROPS CANOLA. Canola Variety Name Changes. Canola Planting Rate and Date

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

Corn Silage C.C. Sheaffer, P.R. Peterson and D.R. Swanson Varietal Trials Results, January 2007

COTTON. Mississippi VARIETY TRIALS, Information Bulletin 372 August Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

2007 Crop Variety Highlights and Insect Pest Updates

Sunflower: 2001 South Dakota Hybrid Performance Trials

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2017 Central and South Texas

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED ***

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Ontario Hybrid Corn Performance Trials

2009 SPRING WHEAT VARIETY RECOMMENDATION MOTIONS 2009 VARIETAL RECOMMENDATION

Soft White Wheat Quality Report

Open Discussion Topic: Potential Pitfalls in the Use of Coefficient of Variation as a Measure of Trial Validity

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2013 Central and South Texas

Recommendations and summary of results 2010

2014 Specialty Crop Report

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2016 Central and South Texas

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance,

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Screening Soybean Varieties for Resistance to Iron Chlorosis, 2003

Table 10. South Central Zone - Late Maturity Grain Trial. (page 1 of 2)

G E O R G I A Soybean, Sorghum Grain and Silage, Summer Annual Forages, and Sunflower Performance Tests

Switchgrass plot following the 2011 harvest at Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, Streeter, ND.

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

2017 MARITIME SOYBEAN VARIETY TRIALS Table 1: Yield Data Roundup Ready Soybean Trials HU Canning,NS Truro,NS Hartland,NB Charlottetown,PEI

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

World Wheat Supply and Demand Situation March 2018

Performance of 32 Hybrid Rice Varieties at Pine Bluff of Arkansas

Plan B Supporting Data for Chapter 2

Canola is Going Green. JoAnne Buth ABIC 2007

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

2014 Soybean Performance Tests

Transcription:

SASKATCHEWAN SUNFLOWER COMMITTEE CO-OPERATIVE TRIALS 2001 TEST RESULTS For Further Information Contact: Cliff Powlowski Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Saskatoon Research Centre 107 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N 0X2 Ph. (306) 956-7616 Fax. (306) 956-7247 Email; PowlowskiC@em.agr.ca Note: Not for publication. Data cannot be used whole or in part without the permission of The Saskatchewan Sunflower Committee

SASKATCHEWAN SUNFLOWER COMMITTEE CO-OPERATIVE TRIALS 2001 APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE PAGE Test summary and list of co-operators 1 Entries in the 2000 Saskatchewan Trials 2 Performance of Varieties and Strains in Saskatchewan 1 3 Comparison of multi-year entries 2 4 Seed yield (kg/ha) 3 5 Oil content 4 6 Test weight (kg/hl) 5 7 1000 seed weight (gm) 6 8 Days to maturity 7 9 Days to first bloom 8 10 Plant height (cm) 9 11 Confection seed size (% over 20/64) 10 12 EMSS Performance of Varieties and Strains in Sask. 11 13 Comparison of multi-year entries in Sask. 12 14 Seed yield (kg/ha) 13 15 Oil content 14 16 Test weight (kg/ha) 15 17 1000 seed weight (gm) 16 18 Days to maturity 17 19 Days to first bloom 18 20 Plant height (cm) 19 21

Page 1 SASKATCHEWAN SUNFLOWER COMMITTEE CO-OPERATIVE TRIALS The Saskatchewan Sunflower Committee is organized under the authority of the Non-Profit Corporations Act of the Province of Saskatchewan. The Committee is voluntary and not organized for financial gain and declares no dividends. The Saskatchewan Sunflower Committee was formed in 1983 to test varieties that may be suitable for growing conditions in the Province. Official Saskatchewan Sunflower Committee Trials can be used for registration purposes. The Committee publishes an annual summary of test results. Varieties that are registered for production in Canada and that are tested in Saskatchewan Sunflower Committee Trials are entered in the Varieties of Grain Crops for Saskatchewan annual publication. The Committee conducted all tests with funds provided by testing fees paid by companies submitting entries. Sites at Scott, Melfort, Canora, Redvers and Outlook were part of the AgriFood Innovation Fund Spoke Program. All sites were arranged in randomized complete block designs. Oil content was done by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance on samples that were dried to less than 5% moisture. The Committee tests later maturing, tall stature hybrids (LMTS) as well as early maturing, shorter stature cultivars (EMSS). The LMTS check variety IS 6111 was included in the EMSS tests. Differences in required plant population, row spacing, time of harvest and zone of adaptation make it impractical to seek direct comparisons. The LMTS site at Outlook was lost. The site at Redvers was not used due to high c.v. Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Saskatoon coordinated all tests. The Committee would like to thank Gillian Brown for statistical analyses. CO-OPERATORS Orland Thompson Indian Head Scott Anderson Canora Steve Dueck Scott Cecil Vera Melfort Desmond McKenzie Tribune Jody McConnell Redvers Clint Ringdal Outlook * Cal McDonald Swift Greg Ford Swift Brian Cowan Watrous Mervin & Murray Loehr Muenster Cliff Powlowski Saskatoon * irrigated site

Page 2 Entries in the 2001 Saskatchewan Sunflower Committee Trials Variety (LMTS) IS 6111 IS 8048* SF187 SF270 SF260 SF125NL** MY8377NS Origin Advanta Seeds Mycogen 63A70 63A30 Pioneer Hi-Bred Variety (EMSS) Origin 6150 Pioneer Hi-Bred 63A21 MDA 3617 IS 6111 Mildola Mycogen * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 1: Performance and Strains of LMTS Varieties and Strains in Saskatchewan Page 3 Years in Test Seed Yield (kg/ha) Days To Maturity Days To first Bloom Oil % Test Weight (kg/hl) Bushel Weight (pounds) 1000 Seed Weight (gm) Plant Height (cm) Entry IS 6111 11 2000 116 72 47.3 41.2 32.7 50.3 121 IS 8048* 3 1955 123 74 31.7 36.6 29.1 119.0 129 SF 270 11 1940 117 75 48.3 40.4 32.1 51.5 116 SF187 10 2029 122 79 46.4 37.9 30.1 44.4 116 SF260 3 2071 120 78 48.7 38.5 30.6 42.7 117 SF125NL** 3 2018 122 78 46.9 44.2 35.1 62.5 136 63A30 3 1986 121 78 48.3 38.3 30.4 47.7 137 63A70 3 2078 122 76 52.0 39.0 31.0 54.8 132 MY8377NS 1 1652 122 77 50.3 39.1 31.0 46.0 134 Average 1970 121 76 46.6 39.5 31.3 57.6 126 * confection Oil% not included in average ** mid-oleic

Table 2: Comparison of Multi-Year Entries in Saskatchewan Page 4 Yield (kg/ha) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999* 2000 2001 IS 6111 2159 2439 1749 3588 2674 2091 1158 2453 2318 2479 2000 IS 8048* 2089 2142 1955 SF187*** 2528 1853 1523 3492 2774 2181 1101 2826 2475 2029 SF270 2413 2440 1562 3583 2893 2547 1305 2748 2321 2573 1940 SF260 2282 2574 2071 SF125NL** 2751 2239 2018 63A30 2773 2550 1986 63A70 2767 2707 2078 Oil % 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999* 2000 2001 IS 6111 44.9 45.3 41.1 50.2 48.7 44.7 47.5 49.6 46.5 46.1 47.3 IS 8048* 25.3 27.2 31.7 SF187**** 44.3 39.4 33.8 45.6 45.4 45.2 44.2 48.1 42.9 46.4 SF270 47.3 46.6 39.7 51.1 49.1 47.2 49.5 50.3 47.8 46.5 48.3 SF260 45.1 44.7 48.7 SF125NL*** 42.2 42.5 46.9 63A30 42.8 45.1 48.3 63A70 48.3 49.4 52.0 Days To Maturity 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999* 2000 2001 IS 6111 113 132 129 121 132 124 121 115 117 117 116 IS 8048** 121 127 123 SF187**** 119 130 135 127 133 122 124 119 125 122 SF270 114 123 129 123 130 125 120 117 119 118 117 SF260 119 118 120 SF125NL*** 124 126 122 63A30 121 124 121 63A70 119 126 122 * 1 location only ** confection *** mid-oleic **** not tested in 1999

Table 3: Seed Yield (kg/ha) Page 5 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 2413 1459 2206 1922 2000 IS 8048* 2308 1338 2658 1515 1955 SF187 2320 1116 2589 2090 2029 SF270 2318 1156 2394 1893 1940 SF260 2638 1150 2268 2230 2071 SF125NL** 2485 1303 2449 1838 2018 MY8377NS 2305 1084 1820 1397 1652 63A30 2773 1109 1990 2070 1986 63A70 2643 1188 2293 2189 2078 Average 2467 1212 2296 1905 C of V% 12.3 12.3 14.6 12.4 LSD 5% 367.0 179.6 405.3 285.9 * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 4: LMTS Oil (%)* Page 6 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 51.1 43.3 46.5 48.4 47.3 IS 8048* 31.9 34.4 31.5 28.8 31.7 SF187 50.0 42.9 46.2 46.4 46.4 SF270 50.6 46.6 49.1 46.7 48.3 SF260 53.4 42.8 49.8 49.0 48.7 SF125NL** 49.8 46.5 46.5 44.6 46.9 MY8377NS 54.4 47.7 50.7 48.4 50.3 63A30 52.3 44.2 47.9 48.7 48.3 63A70 55.6 47.6 53.4 51.4 52.0 Average 49.9 44.0 46.8 45.8 C of V% 2.5 2.6 3.1 1.8 LSD 5% 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.0 * confection ** mid-oleic *** dried to 4% moisture

Table 5: LMTS Test Weight (kg/hl) Page 7 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 43.5 37.7 40.6 43.0 41.2 IS 8048* 36.9 35.8 36.8 37.0 36.6 SF187 41.4 35.0 38.3 36.9 37.9 SF270 41.1 37.8 40.9 42.0 40.4 SF260 41.3 33.5 39.0 40.2 38.5 SF125NL** 47.0 41.2 43.0 45.7 44.2 MY8377NS 41.8 34.4 39.0 41.1 39.1 63A30 40.6 34.9 38.3 39.5 38.3 63A70 41.1 35.0 39.0 40.9 39.0 Average 41.7 36.1 39.4 41.0 C of V% 1.5 2.7 3.0 2.6 LSD 5% 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.3 * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 6: LMTS 1000 Seed Weight (gm) Page 8 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 51.7 35.6 58.7 55.1 50.3 IS 8048* 118.7 99.1 136.4 121.9 119.0 SF187 48.9 26.7 55.8 46.1 44.4 SF270 55.6 32.0 58.9 59.4 51.5 SF260 49.0 26.7 45.4 49.8 42.7 SF125NL** 70.8 43.2 69.0 67.2 62.5 MY8377NS 52.3 28.6 53.0 50.2 46.0 63A30 52.9 31.4 55.9 50.6 47.7 63A70 55.6 34.5 62.0 59.9 54.8 Average 62.5 39.7 66.1 62.2 C of V% 6.2 5.3 9.3 7.4 LSD 5% 4.7 2.6 7.5 5.5 * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 7: LMTS Days to Maturity Page 9 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 110 115 122 116 IS 8048* 116 128 126 123 SF187 120 124 123 122 SF270 111 118 123 117 SF260 116 122 123 120 SF125NL** 120 122 125 122 MY8377NS 118 121 126 122 63A30 121 120 123 121 63A70 119 122 124 122 Average 117 121 124 C of V% 2.7 0.9 0.8 LSD 5% 3.7 1.3 1.1 * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 8: LMTS Days to First Bloom Page 10 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 72 70 74 72 72 IS 8048* 75 73 77 73 74 SF187 79 77 80 79 79 SF270 73 74 78 74 75 SF260 75 77 82 78 78 SF125NL** 75 77 83 77 78 MY8377NS 73 77 80 76 77 63A30 77 77 79 78 78 63A70 74 76 81 75 76 Average 75 75 79 76 C of V% 1.7 1.2 2.9 1.9 LSD 5% 1.5 1.1 2.9 1.7 * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 9: LMTS Plant Height (cm) Page 11 Watrous Indian Head Redvers Mean IS 6111 100 119 126 138 121 IS 8048* 122 122 137 138 129 SF187 93 112 128 131 116 SF270 95 112 127 130 116 SF260 98 110 131 130 117 SF125NL** 123 125 149 149 136 MY8377NS 114 130 143 150 134 63A30 121 128 153 144 137 63A70 115 126 147 142 132 Average 109 120 138 139 C of V% 4.6 5.1 4.5 4.3 LSD 5% 6.0 7.4 7.5 7.3 * confection ** mid-oleic

Table 10: Confection Seed Size (% Over 20/64) Page 12 Watrous Indian Head Redvers IS 8048 over 20/64 36.7 31.3 52.5 32.2

Table 11: Performance of EMSS Varieties and Strains in Saskatchewan Page 13 Entry Years in Test Seed Yield (kg/ha) Days To Maturity Days To First Bloom Oil % ** Test Weight (kg/hl) Bushel Weight (pounds) 1000 Seed Weight (gm) Plant Height (cm) 6150 9 2020 111 64 48.1 41.6 33.0 44.3 89 63A21 4 2183 116 68 49.0 40.6 32.2 45.0 94 MDA 3617 1 1596 95 57 45.5 38.4 30.5 47.4 67 IS 6111* 3 2022 118 72 50.4 43.0 34.1 44.5 104 Average 1955 110 65 48.2 40.9 32.5 45.4 88 * LMTS Check ** dried to 4% moisture

Table 12: Comparison of Multi-Year EMSS Entries in Saskatchewan Page 14 Yield (kg/ha) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 6150 2007 2762 2266 1943 2450 1792 1579 2021 2020 63A21 2030 1749 2271 2183 IS 6111* 1448 2651 2022 Oil Content ** 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 6150 41.5 49.0 46.3 45.7 47.2 48.9 47.3 45.2 48.1 63A21 50.2 45.4 45.4 49.0 IS 6111* 46.4 47.6 50.4 Days To Maturity 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 6150 123 116 111 113 110 105 110 115 111 63A21 111 111 117 116 IS 6111* 118 121 118 * LMTS Check ** dried to less than moisture

Table 13: EMSS Seed Yield (kg/ha) Page 15 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 2825 1986 2928 2081 769 1534 2020 63A21 3216 2129 3198 2273 661 1621 2183 MDA 3617 2330 1477 2058 1390 722 ** 1596 IS 6111* 3445 1684 3127 1836 693 1344 2022 Average 2954 1819 2828 1895 711 1500 C. of V. % 9.9 7.3 20.2 15.6 6.6 8.8 LSD 5% 377.7 171.2 738.6 383.5 60.6 180.5 * LMTS Check

Table 14: EMSS Oil % ** Page 16 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 49.2 47.4 45.1 50.5 46.5 49.8 48.1 63A21 50.6 48.1 47.5 51.2 47.4 50.3 49.0 MDA 3617 45.0 43.7 42.8 47.7 43.3 45.5 IS 6111* 52.9 45.4 49.9 52.6 49.1 52.3 50.4 Average 49.4 46.1 46.3 50.5 46.6 50.9 C. of V. % 1.7 1.7 2.1 1.6 0.9 1.4 LSD 5% 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.5 1.0 * LMTS Check ** dried to 4% moisture

Table 15: EMSS Test Weight (kg/hl) Page 17 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 42.2 39.0 41.0 42.4 41.2 43.6 41.6 63A21 42.0 38.9 39.7 40.5 41.4 41.1 40.6 MDA 3617 38.2 36.1 39.9 38.8 38.9 38.4 IS 6111* 44.8 36.7 44.8 42.9 44.4 44.1 43.0 Average 41.8 37.7 41.4 41.2 41.4 42.9 C. of V. % 2.5 2.0 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.9 LSD 5% 1.4 1.0 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.5 * LMTS Check

Table 16: EMSS 1000 Seed Weight (gm) Page 18 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 46.9 45.4 52.6 43.4 28.4 49.0 44.3 63A21 51.6 43.5 54.6 42.8 28.6 49.0 45.0 MDA 3617 49.2 46.1 64.2 48.7 29.0 47.4 IS 6111* 54.5 39.7 57.3 35.2 28.5 51.8 44.5 Average 50.6 43.7 57.2 42.5 28.6 49.9 C. of V. % 7.1 2.7 6.6 6.7 4.0 3.3 LSD 5% 4.6 1.5 4.9 3.7 1.5 2.2 * LMTS Check

Table 17: EMSS Days to Maturity Page 19 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 101 106 127 111 63A21 105 110 134 116 MDA 3617 93 95 97 95 IS 6111* 111 113 130 118 Average 102 106 122 C. of V. % 3.4 0.9 1.2 LSD 5% 4.6 1.3 1.9 * LMTS Check

Table 18: EMSS Days to First Bloom Page 20 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 65 59 65 68 63 64 63A21 66 62 70 77 67 68 MDA 3617 55 57 60 56 60 57 IS 6111* 70 72 73 74 71 72 Average 64 62 67 68 C. of V. % 1.5 0.9 2.1 5.8 LSD 5% 1.3 0.7 1.9 5.2 * LMTS Check

Table 19: EMSS Plant Height (cm) Page 21 Watrous Melfort Scott Muenster Mean 6150 88 95 113 79 70 89 63A21 100 104 113 85 69 94 MDA 3617 60 83 72 62 56 67 IS 6111* 102 121 126 94 76 104 Average 88 100 106 80 68 C. of V. % 8.6 2.0 8.4 8.5 5.5 LSD 5% 9.7 2.6 11.5 8.8 4.9 lmts check ** mid-oleic