The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

Similar documents
Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Technology Evaluation Scorecard Suitability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GUIDE

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Metra seeks your feedback!

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

RTSP Phase II Update

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Planning for Tomorrow

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

Needs and Community Characteristics

MetroExpress Improvements

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Leveraging Land Use Changes through Transportation Funding

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Green Line Long-Term Investments

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

Shuttle Bug: Linking Workers to Public Transportation in Northern Cook and Southern Lake Counties University of Illinois- Chicago Urban

Locally Preferred Alternative Report

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Scarborough Transit Planning

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

2019 New Transit Service Plan

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Transit Access Study

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

CTA Orange Line Extension Alternatives Analysis. Locally Preferred Alternative Report. August 2009

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

METRO Light Rail Update

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Multnomah County Commission December 15, 2016

TIER TWO SCREENING REPORT

Finding Ways out of Congestion for the Chicago Loop. - - A Micro-simulation Approach

CTA Blue Line Study Area

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

DART Priorities Overview

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

Art Griffith, Capital Projects Manager, ,

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Maryland Gets to Work

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Scope of Services January 26, Project Development and Conceptual Engineering for City of Lake Forest Amtrak Station

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Program. presented by: September 22, 2010

I-35W & Lake Street Station

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. July 2018

I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Transcription:

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects UTC 2018 Seminar Series March 15, 2018 Claire Bozic Martin Menninger

ON TO 2050 CMAP is the Region s MPO, seven county region Land use and transportation plan every 4 yrs. ON TO 2050 will build on GO TO 2040 Draft in June 2018, Final in October 2018

Regionally Significant Projects Called Major Capital Projects new name reflects redefinition - Transit capacity projects (if $100 m and have separate ROW or priority over other traffic) Evaluation with travel demand model and select other methods - State of good repair / system preservation ($250 m or more) Document need for project, mostly qualitatively Evaluating - 65 transit projects - 23 expressway - 19 arterial projects

GO TO 2040 ON TO 2050 has built on the concepts and recommendations of GO TO 2040

A collaborative process Initially proposed 20 transit measures 6 measures were removed and 4 were added based on feedback from RTA and service boards

Parallel Modeling Processes CMAP Regional Transportation Authority Software CMAP Trip Based Model (Fortan, Emme, Python, ArcGis) STOPS and Access Tool (FTA Simplified Trips-on-Project, ArcGis) Projects Highway Transit

ON TO 2050 Transit Measures Increased from measures 11 in GO TO 2040 to 18 measures for ON TO 2050 Somewhat analogues to highway projects Incorporate new tools and data that have been developed Capture data related to policy goals Four categories - Capital and Operating Cost - Existing Needs - Travel Benefits - Planning Priorities

Transit Existing Needs GO TO 2040 Initial List Final List Asset condition - TERM scale Capacity constraint Reliability impact Address an existing ADA deficiency Asset condition - COST tool Capacity constraint Reliability impact Address an existing ADA deficiency

Transit Travel Benefits GO TO 2040 Initial List Final List Regional congested VHT (daily) Corridor congested VHT (daily) Transit trips (daily) Work trip travel time by transit (minutes) Regional congested VHT (daily) Corridor congested VHT (daily) Project ridership (daily) Change in regional ridership (daily) Work trip travel time by transit (minutes) Project user work trip travel time Change in VMT (daily) Project ridership (daily) Change in regional ridership (daily) Absolute change in avg. work trip transit travel time Number of jobs accessible within 75 minutes by transit Number of jobs accessible within 75 minutes by transit Jobs accessible within 90/60-minutes for average resident

Transit Planning Priorities GO TO 2040 Initial List Final List Percent of trip origins within current municipal borders New impervious surface in project corridor (acres) Number of households located in Green Infrastructure Vision areas Gross regional product ($ millions annually) TREDIS Percent change in job accessibility in environmental justice areas Carbon dioxide emissions (tons/year) Percent of trip origins within current municipal borders Local planning support Access to transit impact (CMAP developed index) Transit access score Economic impact from improved market access Residents within 90- minutes of access to an average key industry job Customer experience (qualitative) Fraction of riders from excluded communities Change in number of jobs accessible within 75 minutes for excluded communities Green house gas emissions Infill support Economic impact from improved market access Fraction of riders from Economically Disconnected Areas Low barrier jobs to excluded comm. 90/60 min Green house gas emissions Safety

Results DRAFT Project ID Name Implementer Submitter 94.94% 1.00 2 2.1 3 3.1 4 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 9 10 11 12 13 14 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 15 16 18 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 x 19 15 16 17 x 19 Status Asset condition Capacity constraint (1 = Capacity Need Current Reliability Reliability Impact Addresses existing ADA NEEDS ANALYSIS Project capital cost ($M) Capital Cost Year Construction Year Pct. Of Capital Cost for New Capacity Capital reinvestment Annual Incremental operating cost ($) Risk assessment CAPITAL AND OPERATING Project ridership (daily) Change in regional ridership (daily) Change in VMT (daily) Absolute change in avg. work trip transit travel time Wrk_time_diff (project users only) Jobs accessible within 90- minutes for average resident (#) (%) Jobs accessible within 60- minutes for average resident (#) 57 Red Line South Ext. CTA CTA 100% N/A 6 Medium 98.1 Low No 100% 2,300 $ YOE 2022 100% x $18,977,890 Low 100% 28,525 6,338 (78,989) (0.0782) (6.8490) 1,048,852 7,342 0.7% 431,857 4,766 1.1% 100% 31,222 7,193 (89,859) (0.0678) (6.9855) 1,227,663 11,354 0.9% 505,189 6,471 1.3% 100% 60.44% 74.06 70,085 449 0.6% 39,790 390 1.0% Urban (20,280) 100% 61% 71 3,627,787 $ Urb (23,070) 100% 58 RPM Phase 2 CTA CTA 100% 2.57 9 High 94.4 Medium Yes 100% 4,200 $ 2016 2025 50% x $10,265,128 Low 100% 368,591 17,960 (170,174) (0.6107) (1.9442) 1,054,681 7,895 0.8% 438,674 7,910 1.8% 100% 626,686 27,268 (274,788) (0.6035) (1.8341) 1,231,776 9,274 0.8% 512,200 9,173 1.8% 100% 37.58% 76.36 70,233 381 0.5% 39,820 238 0.6% Urban (43,690) 100% 42% 75 62,900,556 $ Urb (70,549) 100% 59 Blue Line West Extension CTA CTA 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 2,573 $ 2009 2041 75% x $7,451,546 Medium100% 8,204 3,850 (43,541) -0.0068 (15.2694) 1,046,433 4,923 0.5% 434,575 7,483 1.8% 100% 12,338 5,682 (66,217) (0.0088) (15.3209) 1,222,024 5,714 0.5% 506,862 8,144 1.6% 100% 0.2901 87.58 69,875 239 0.3% 39,700 300 0.8% Urban (11,179) 100% 28% 86 3,188,101 $ Urb (17,001) 100% 60 Brown Line Extension CTA CTA 100% N/A 8 High N/A N/A No 100% 4,139 $ 2009 2041 75% x $5,973,286 Medium100% 14,771 3,082 (23,166) (0.0446) (5.3246) 1,044,639 3,129 0.3% 429,608 2,517 0.6% 100% 16,563 3,241 (25,150) (0.0440) (5.5151) 1,219,649 3,339 0.3% 501,457 2,738 0.5% 100% 45.49% 75.21 69,886 250 0.4% 39,480 81 0.2% Urban (5,948) 100% 46% 74 4,140,430 $ Urb (6,457) 100% 61 Circle Line South (Phase II) CTA CTA 43% N/A 3 Low N/A N/A No 100% 1,000 $ 2009 2041 75% x $15,000,000 Medium100% 0% 0% Urban - 20% Urb - 40% 62 Circle Line North (Phase III) CTA CTA 43% N/A 3 Low N/A N/A No 100% 2,237 $ 2009 2041 75% x $7,000,000 Medium100% 0% 0% Urban - 20% Urb - 40% 63 Orange Line Extension CTA CTA 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 498 $ 2016 2041 75% x $1,083,179 Low 100% 9,337 1,999 (20,597) (0.0209) (7.2014) 1,047,382 5,871 0.6% 434,141 7,050 1.7% 100% 10,244 2,265 (23,548) (0.0189) (7.1389) 1,223,252 6,942 0.6% 506,634 7,915 1.6% 100% 43.45% 78.31 69,930 294 0.4% 39,859 459 1.2% Urban (5,288) 100% 44% 78 2,063,812 $ Urb (6,046) 100% 64 Yellow Line Enhancements acta CTA 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 294 $ 2009 2041 75% x $824,152 Low 100% 3,566 1,163 (13,002) (0.0117) (7.7201) 1,042,718 1,208 0.1% 428,969 1,878 0.4% 100% 5,753 1,584 (18,965) (0.0128) (7.7662) 1,217,755 1,445 0.1% 500,862 2,143 0.4% 100% 23.32% 78.77 69,673 37 0.1% 39,430 30 0.1% Urban (3,338) 100% 27% 75 1,410,058 $ Urb (4,869) 100% 66 UP NW Extension Metra Metra 100% N/A 5 Medium 96.3 Low No 100% 703 $ 2016 2020 50% x $2,843,192 Medium100% 41,171 2,683 (89,040) (0.0530) (4.4661) 1,044,624 3,114 0.3% 428,663 1,572 0.4% 100% 41,171 2,683 (89,040) (0.0509) (4.4046) 1,219,626 3,317 0.3% 500,586 1,868 0.4% 100% 5.29% 36.90 69,882 246 0.4% 39,434 35 0.1% Subur (19,591) 100% 5% 36 9,793,394 $ Sub (19,591) 100% 67 SWS Improvements / 75th StMetra Metra 100% N/A 8 High 95.2 High No 100% 1,669 $ 2016 2030 25% x ($1,844,472) Low 100% 23,629 5,386 (104,733) (0.1838) (13.6985) 1,052,960 11,450 0 429,082 1,990 0.5% 100% 27,712 6,235 (127,167) (0.1743) (13.7741) 1,230,837 14,527 1.2% 500,933 2,214 0.4% 100% 15.48% 51.39 69,807 171 0.2% 39,464 64 0.2% Subur (23,043) 100% 14% 51 15,291,261 $ Sub (27,979) 100% 68 UP-N Improvements Metra Metra 100% 3.03 6 Medium 97.8 Medium No 100% 961 $ 2016 2020 25% x $8,633,896 Low 100% 38,567 3,138 (64,563) (0.0144) (4.3226) 1,043,699 2,188 0.2% 427,837 746 0.2% 100% 58,614 4,154 (85,910) (0.0291) (4.6886) 1,218,816 2,507 0.2% 499,709 991 0.2% 100% 22.63% 57.88 69,759 123 0.2% 39,428 29 0.1% Subur (14,205) 100% 21% 58 9,699,751 $ Sub (18,902) 100% 69 UP-W Upgrade Metra Metra 100% 2.96 3 Low 95.1 Medium No 100% 385 $ 2016 2020 25% x $1,205,456 Low 100% 36,933 6,128 (134,967) (0.1644) (11.1063) 1,055,462 13,951 1.3% 435,913 8,822 2.1% 100% 44,507 7,393 (163,483) (0.1727) (11.2295) 1,231,782 15,473 1.3% 508,414 9,695 1.9% 100% 13.91% 45.22 70,061 425 0.6% 39,830 431 1.1% Subur (29,695) 100% 13% 42 14,947,146 $ Sub (35,970) 100% 70 RI Improvements Metra Metra 100% 3.56 1 Low 96.1 High No 100% 563 $ 2016 2020 25% x $3,587,088 Low 100% 28,861 920 (25,430) 0.0181 (2.6791) 1,052,105 10,595 1.0% 432,346 5,255 1.2% 100% 35,932 1,222 (34,398) 0.0108 (2.8840) 1,229,263 12,954 1.1% 504,894 6,175 1.2% 100% 25.39% 51.69 70,200 564 0.8% 39,578 179 0.5% Subur (5,595) 100% 22% 51 2,793,651 $ Sub (7,568) 100% 71 BNSF Extension-Oswego/Pla Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 439 $ 2016 2020 100% x $979,116 Medium100% 2,925 683 (45,220) 0.0409 (9.0366) 1,041,583 72 0.0% 426,864-227 -0.1% 100% 11,531 2,007 (166,727) 0.0936 (8.7069) 1,216,649 340 0.0% 498,537-181 0.0% 100% 11.99% 15.26 69,640 4 0.0% 39,406 6 0.0% Subur (9,949) 100% 8% 14 1,573,341 $ Sub (36,683) 100% 72 BNSF Improvements Metra Metra 100% N/A 8 High 93.1 Medium No 100% 268 $ 2016 2041 25% x ($682,510) Low 100% 61,085 6,432 (141,100) (0.0428) (9.0514) 1,044,914 3,404 0.3% 427,279 187 0.0% 100% 77,357 8,047 (182,922) (0.0608) (9.1463) 1,220,729 4,420 0.4% 498,956 238 0.0% 100% 10.37% 58.22 69,638 2 0.0% 39,402 3 0.0% Subur (31,045) 100% 10% 57 3,769,492 $ Sub (40,246) 100% 73 HC Improvements Metra Metra 100% 3.22 - N/A 94.2 High No 100% 271 $ 2016 2041 25% x $11,086,991 Low 100% 6,691 2,010 (43,246) - (13.7808) 1,047,857 6,346 0.6% 427,382 291 0.1% 100% 8,612 2,528 (55,223) (0.0022) (13.6329) 1,223,799 7,490 0.6% 499,078 359 0.1% 100% 13.55% 49.98 69,821 185 0.3% 39,442 43 0.1% Subur (9,515) 100% 12% 49 2,847,284 $ Sub (12,150) 100% 74 ME Improvements Metra Metra 43% 3.44 - N/A 97.6 Medium No 100% 447 $ 2016 2041 25% x $2,000,000 Low 100% 0% 0% Subur - 20% Sub - 40% 75 ME Extension Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 1,153 $ 2016 2020 50% x $12,444,402 Medium100% 709 1,406 (33,801) 0.0028 (1.0813) 1,042,781 1,270 0.1% 427,340 249 0.1% 100% 4,220 3,869 (106,878) 0.0112 (2.5679) 1,218,111 1,802 0.1% 499,070 351 0.1% 100% 5.49% 5.73 69,715 80 0.1% 39,414 14 0.0% Subur (7,437) 100% 3% 5 138,976 $ Sub (23,515) 100% 76 MD-N Extension-WadsworthMetra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 457 $ 2016 2020 75% x $4,832,175 Medium100% 1,085 416 (8,955) 0.0174 (16.8835) 1,043,329 1,819 0.2% 428,935 1,843 0.4% 100% 1,155 427 (9,101) 0.0122 (16.7775) 1,218,298 1,989 0.2% 500,765 2,047 0.4% 100% 28.94% 40.08 69,643 7 0.0% 39,423 23 0.1% Subur (1,970) 100% 27% 32 522,411 $ Sub (2,002) 100% 77 MD-N Improvements Metra Metra 100% 3.44 - N/A 94.6 Medium No 100% 681 $ 2016 2020 25% x $6,518,165 Low 100% 23,872 252 (7,698) (0.0516) (2.2215) 1,044,637 3,127 0.3% 429,053 1,961 0.5% 100% 33,298 368 (11,574) (0.0629) (2.2994) 1,219,982 3,673 0.3% 500,868 2,149 0.4% 100% 14.93% 48.56 69,854 218 0.3% 39,519 120 0.3% Subur (1,694) 100% 13% 47 5,453,269 $ Sub (2,547) 100% 78 MD-W Extension-Marengo Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 660 $ 2016 2020 25% x $1,816,637 Medium100% 946 (62) (3,854) 0.0497 0.8620 1,041,715 205 0.0% 427,168 77 0.0% 100% 3,256 844 (51,753) 0.1289 2.4139 1,216,664 355 0.0% 498,827 108 0.0% 100% 0.02% 8.59 69,645 10 0.0% 39,406 7 0.0% Subur (848) 100% 0% 8 271,190 $ Sub (11,387) 100% 79 MD-W Improvements Metra Metra 100% 3.25 1 Low 94.9 Medium No 100% 629 $ 2016 2041 25% x $2,031,932 Low 100% 23,520 981 (27,979) (0.0135) (3.1192) 1,049,698 8,188 0.8% 429,228 2,137 0.5% 100% 28,461 1,136 (33,181) (0.0193) (3.1590) 1,225,167 8,858 0.7% 501,119 2,400 0.5% 100% 26.07% 54.12 70,250 614 0.9% 39,640 241 0.6% Subur (6,156) 100% 26% 53 3,433,480 $ Sub (7,300) 100% 80 NCS Improvements Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A 94.5 Medium No 100% 501 $ 2016 2041 50% x $15,960,115 Low 100% 9,914 1,303 (32,239) (0.0086) (8.7675) 1,042,398 888 0.1% 427,988 896 0.2% 100% 13,475 1,674 (43,454) (0.0094) (8.5018) 1,217,531 1,222 0.1% 499,686 967 0.2% 100% 13.85% 52.26 69,689 54 0.1% 39,425 26 0.1% Subur (7,093) 100% 13% 44 430,927 $ Sub (9,561) 100% 81 RI Extension Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 487 $ 2016 2041 100% x ($200,271) Medium100% 549 598 (17,111) 0.0080 (6.5799) 1,041,763 252 0.0% 427,170 79 0.0% 100% 3,216 2,785 (102,838) 0.0368 (6.8487) 1,216,783 473 0.0% 498,821 103 0.0% 100% 0.37% 16.26 69,652 16 0.0% 39,380-20 0.0% Subur (3,765) 100% 0% 11 60,520 $ Sub (22,626) 100% 82 Southeast Service Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 4,887 $ 2016 2041 75% x $8,111,979 Medium100% 8,783 4,860 (73,434) 0.1030 (9.5708) 1,043,360 1,849 0.2% 428,835 1,744 0.4% 100% 22,323 8,046 (169,652) 0.0941 (9.7728) 1,218,779 2,470 0.2% 500,994 2,275 0.5% 100% 56.21% 23.54 69,816 180 0.3% 39,564 165 0.4% Subur (16,157) 100% 55% 26 2,400,284 $ Sub (37,327) 100% 84 STAR Line Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 3,071 $ 2016 2041 100% x $33,076,344 Medium100% 14,479 11,187 (218,219) 0.0902 (24.7047) 1,053,460 11,950 1.1% 430,975 3,884 0.9% 100% 27,804 20,503 (484,967) (0.0079) (26.4065) 1,230,269 13,960 1.1% 503,131 4,412 0.9% 100% 19.48% 44.75 70,304 669 1.0% 39,559 160 0.4% Subur (48,013) 100% 19% 43 22,140,619 $ Sub (106,702) 100% 85 West Loop TC Phase I CDOT CDOT 100% N/A 8 High N/A Low Yes 100% 600 $ 2016 2020 100% x $1,000,000 Low 100% x x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x x x x Urban #VALUE! 100% x x x x x 100% 87 Mid-City Transitway (Rail) CDOT CDOT 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 6,600 $ 2016 2041 100% x $30,713,080 High 100% 33,149 11,845 (121,420) (0.0937) (8.7357) 1,069,795 28,285 2.7% 438,205 11,114 2.6% 100% 37,795 13,490 (139,129) (0.0958) (8.8398) 1,247,776 31,466 2.6% 511,194 12,475 2.5% 100% 77.15% 79.25 72,321 2,685 3.9% 40,565 1,166 3.0% Urban (31,173) 100% 77% 76 6,332,179 $ Urb (35,720) 100% 88 West Loop TC Phase II CDOT CDOT 100% N/A 6 Medium N/A N/A No 100% 2,000 $ 2016 2041 100% x $5,000,000 High 100% x x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x x x x Urban #VALUE! 100% x x x Urb #VALUE! 100% 93 Forest Park Recons. CTA CTA 100% 2.56 6 Medium 96.2 Medium Yes 100% 1,700 $ 2016 2025 25% x ($6,192,211) Low 100% 60,451 3,596 (28,735) (0.1189) (2.9099) 1,045,939 4,428 0.4% 430,664 3,572 0.8% 100% 71,809 4,222 (33,216) (0.1150) (2.8562) 1,221,344 5,035 0.4% 502,925 4,206 0.8% 100% 59.27% 78.99 69,850 214 0.3% 39,546 146 0.4% Urban (7,377) 100% 58% 73 15,763,100 $ Urb (8,528) 100% 94 Brown Line Capacity Expans CTA CTA 100% N/A 8 High 97.5 Low No 100% 1,500 $ 2017 2025 100% x $1,225,728 Low 100% 109,102 3,048 (26,893) (0.1000) (0.7561) 1,042,426 916 0.1% 427,911 820 0.2% 100% 176,067 4,996 (47,624) (0.1075) (0.7838) 1,217,428 1,118 0.1% 499,673 954 0.2% 100% 23.02% 72.55 69,685 49 0.1% 39,432 32 0.1% Urban (6,905) 100% 24% 69 9,474,813 $ Urb (12,227) 100% 98 A-2 Crossing Rebuild Metra Metra 100% N/A 3 Low 94.8 High No 100% 703 $ 2016 2020 25% x ($4,991,300) Low 100% 85,286 3,157 (79,340) (0.1890) (2.4179) 1,050,713 9,203 0.9% 432,112 5,021 1.2% 100% 108,798 3,892 (112,302) (0.2080) (2.4146) 1,226,473 10,164 0.8% 504,152 5,434 1.1% 100% 17.10% 49.60 70,290 655 0.9% 39,661 261 0.7% Subur (17,456) 100% 16% 47 14,952,946 $ Sub (24,709) 100% 102 Pulse Pulse ART Routes Pace Pace 100% N/A x x x High x 100% 937 $ 2016 Varies 75% x $176,400,000 Low 100% x x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x x x x x x 100% x x x x x 100% 102A Pace Short Term ART Pace Pace 100% N/A - N/A 70.4 High No 100% 119 $ 2016 Varies 75% x $27,000,000 Low 100% 41,264 9,996 (109,632) (0.0768) (9.0793) 1,053,909 12,398 1.2% 430,549 3,457 0.8% 100% 45,362 10,887 (121,057) (0.0721) (9.0141) 1,230,237 13,928 1.1% 502,646 3,927 0.8% 100% 35.06% 78.83 70,563 927 1.3% 39,626 226 0.6% Subur (24,121) 100% 35% 78 38,002,718 $ Sub (26,635) 100% 102B Pace Mid Term ART Pace Pace 100% N/A - N/A 70.4 Medium No 100% 246 $ 2016 Varies 75% x $50,000,000 Medium100% 44,556 15,096 (184,220) (0.0252) (15.9978) 1,091,758 37,850 3.6% 440,687 10,138 2.4% 100% 68,938 21,433 (301,477) (0.0450) (15.4139) 1,274,684 44,447 3.6% 514,315 11,669 2.3% 100% 27.56% 67.42 73,188 2,625 3.7% 40,067 441 1.1% Subur (40,532) 100% 29% 62 45,133,478 $ Sub (66,331) 100% 102C Pace Long Term ART Pace Pace 72% N/A - N/A N/A Medium No 100% 572 $ 2016 Varies 100% x $99,400,000 Medium100% 39,157 20,749 (249,976) 0.3985 (17.2296) 45% 51,830 25,159 (351,461) 0.3760 (14.8319) 45% 26.80% 54.84 Subur (55,000) 40% 23% 53 46,543,394 $ Sub (77,328) 100% 103 River North-Streeterville Tra CDOT CDOT 100% N/A - N/A 54.0 High No 100% 400 $ 2016 2020 100% x $10,672,014 Low 100% 19,592 4,840 (15,513) (0.0642) (1.4594) 1,042,292 782 0.1% 427,925 833 0.2% 100% 32,954 7,737 (30,929) (0.0743) (1.4950) 1,217,348 1,039 0.1% 499,717 998 0.2% 100% 11.46% 57.36 69,640 5 0.0% 39,409 10 0.0% Urban (3,983) 100% 15% 54 26,913,124 $ Urb (7,941) 100% 104 South Lakefront-Museum Ca CDOT CDOT 100% N/A - N/A 57.9 High No 100% 400 $ 2016 2020 100% x $2,330,896 Low 100% 78,765 7,044 (66,619) (0.1650) (3.5274) 1,044,022 2,512 0.2% 428,964 1,873 0.4% 100% 80,853 5,971 (68,857) (0.1640) (3.9758) 1,217,348 1,039 0.1% 501,123 2,404 0.5% 100% 56.50% 72.71 69,751 115 0.2% 39,599 200 0.5% Urban (17,104) 100% 55% 66 10,692,471 $ Urb (17,678) 100% 105 Express Bus Expansion Pace Pace 43% N/A - N/A N/A High No 100% 1,775 $ 2016 Varies 100% x $57,000,000 Low 100% 0% 0% Subur - 20% Sub - 40% 106 Ashland Ave BRT CTA CTA 100% N/A - N/A 54.0 High No 100% 160 $ 2014 2021 75% x $1,088,758 Medium100% 38,237 3,528 (42,714) (0.1087) (3.4819) 1,052,991 11,481 1.1% 434,590 7,499 1.8% 100% 58,961 11,757 (106,501) (0.1226) (3.5389) 1,229,218 12,909 1.1% 507,273 8,555 1.7% 100% 57.79% 66.56 70,164 529 0.8% 39,752 352 0.9% Urban (10,966) 100% 59% 59 11,044,771 $ Urb (27,343) 100% 107 Green Line Extension CTA CTA 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 1,000 $ 2015 2020 100% x $847,820 Medium100% 2,899 412 (2,771) (0.0037) (1.4266) 1,041,601 91 0.0% 427,131 40 0.0% 100% 3,135 450 (3,115) (0.0034) (1.4345) 1,216,429 120 0.0% 498,767 48 0.0% 100% 70.70% 81.36 69,644 9 0.0% 39,401 2 0.0% Urban (712) 100% 70% 81 297,538 $ Urb (800) 100% 108 South Halsted BRT CTA CTA 100% N/A - N/A 71.0 High No 100% 144 $ 2015 2025 75% x $1,199,788 Low 100% 6,348 447 (5,948) (0.0063) (3.9890) 1,041,692 182 0.0% 427,387 296 0.1% 100% 6,959 449 (6,087) (0.0060) (3.9097) 1,216,545 235 0.0% 499,083 364 0.1% 100% 71.22% 66.62 69,657 22 0.0% 39,440 40 0.1% Urban (1,527) 100% 71% 59 157,492 $ Urb (1,563) 100% 115 BNSF Extension-Sugar GroveMetra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 368 $ 2016 2041 100% x $1,243,206 Medium100% 2,502 460 (32,822) 0.0208 (7.5999) 1,041,356-154 0.0% 426,877-214 -0.1% 100% 9,243 1,150 (108,944) 0.0329 (7.0117) 1,216,182-127 0.0% 498,511-207 0.0% 100% 12.88% 24.24 69,640 5 0.0% 39,406 7 0.0% Subur (7,221) 100% 9% 21 686,690 $ Sub (23,970) 100% 116 HC Extension Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 168 $ 2016 2041 100% x $521,643 Medium100% 219 162 (7,440) 0.0089 (8.5722) 1,041,643 133 0.0% 427,150 59 0.0% 100% 1,151 1,148 (58,064) 0.0475 (8.5722) 1,216,609 299 0.0% 498,810 91 0.0% 100% 0.03% 19.53 69,638 2 0.0% 39,400 1 0.0% Subur (1,637) 100% 0% 8 164,531 $ Sub (12,775) 100% 117 MD-N Extension-Richmond Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 358 $ 2016 2041 100% x $243,509 Medium100% 984 300 (22,883) 0.0093 (3.5314) 1,041,583 73 0.0% 427,320 229 0.1% 100% 2,106 399 (32,070) 0.0090 (3.4845) 1,216,427 117 0.0% 498,976 257 0.1% 100% 0.00% 14.16 69,634-1 0.0% 39,400 0 0.0% Subur (5,035) 100% 0% 10 16,203 $ Sub (7,056) 100% 118 MD-W Extension-HampshireMetra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 436 $ 2016 2041 100% x $5,494,443 Medium100% 134 131 (4,721) 0.0129 8.9976 1,041,614 104 0.0% 427,092 1 0.0% 100% 272 266 (9,282) 0.0344 8.9248 1,216,392 83 0.0% 498,719 1 0.0% 100% 0.04% 2.78 69,638 3 0.0% 39,399 0 0.0% Subur (1,039) 100% 0% 2 142,492 $ Sub (2,042) 100% 119 STAR Line Eastern Segment Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 1,691 $ 2016 2041 100% x $17,220,232 High 100% 1,892 2,052 (24,698) 0.0233 (7.5525) 1,042,725 1,215 0.1% 427,596 505 0.1% 100% 3,407 3,422 (63,856) 0.0423 (0.8779) 1,218,130 1,821 0.1% 499,417 698 0.1% 100% 38.76% 40.60 69,678 42 0.1% 39,390-10 0.0% Subur (5,434) 100% 24% 33 1,991,773 $ Sub (14,050) 100% 120 STAR Line Northern Segment Metra Metra 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 1,378 $ 2016 2041 100% x $16,223,193 High 100% 2,476 2,106 (40,731) 0.0912 (21.4974) 1,046,356 4,846 0.5% 427,984 893 0.2% 100% 2,870 2,598 (51,071) 0.0781 (19.3405) 1,220,892 4,583 0.4% 499,691 972 0.2% 100% 27.24% 50.86 69,753 117 0.2% 39,423 24 0.1% Subur (8,962) 100% 26% 50 4,657,460 $ Sub (11,237) 100% 121 Rock Island RER Service Metra Public 100% 3.56 1 Low 97.1 Low Yes 100% 550 $ 2016 2034 100% x $33,821,827 Medium100% 35,015 1,573 (26,932) 0.0470 (4.3859) 1,052,105 10,595 1.0% 432,346 5,255 1.2% 100% 42,293 1,970 (34,233) 0.0490 (4.5000) 1,229,263 12,954 1.1% 504,894 6,175 1.2% 100% 30.80% 57.20 70,200 564 0.8% 39,578 179 0.5% Subur (5,926) 100% 29% 55 1,929,339 $ Sub (7,532) 100% 122 UP North RER Service Metra Public 100% 3.03 6 Medium 97.5 Low Yes 100% 1,803 $ 2016 2034 100% x $52,245,738 Medium100% 51,199 7,548 (162,964) (0.0414) (8.4839) 1,056,316 14,806 1.4% 431,898 4,807 1.1% 100% 70,827 10,306 (223,191) (0.0589) (8.8874) 1,232,536 16,227 1.3% 504,188 5,469 1.1% 100% 22.18% 58.23 70,171 535 0.8% 39,482 83 0.2% Subur (35,855) 100% 20% 59 9,798,161 $ Sub (49,106) 100% 123 UP Northwest RER Service Metra Public 100% 3.24 5 Medium 96.2 Low Yes 100% 2,208 $ 2016 2034 100% x $42,952,314 Medium100% 50,156 7,321 (196,665) (0.1152) (8.8917) 1,080,801 39,290 3.8% 440,963 13,871 3.2% 100% 68,907 9,913 (287,035) (0.1569) (9.3558) 1,261,898 45,589 3.7% 514,453 15,734 3.2% 100% 6.34% 37.75 71,080 1,445 2.1% 39,632 232 0.6% Subur (43,270) 100% 6% 37 12,261,691 $ Sub (63,153) 100% 124 CrossRail Chicago Metra Public 100% N/A 1 Low No N/A Yes 100% 3,904 $ 2016 2034 50% x $54,008,522 Medium100% 15,342 2,671 (52,864) (0.0274) (9.3370) 1,049,411 7,900 0.8% 432,889 5,798 1.4% 100% 19,201 3,362 (69,696) (0.0289) (9.7298) 1,227,524 11,214 0.9% 505,355 6,637 1.3% 100% 38.18% 36.34 70,046 411 0.6% 39,793 394 1.0% Subur (11,631) 100% 36% 33 5,043,403 $ Sub (15,335) 100% 125 North Lakefront Light Rail Li CDOT Public 100% N/A 6 Medium N/A N/A No 100% 534 $ 2016 2034 100% x ($15,272,810) High 100% 42,552 (4,161) 64,040 0.0474 (1.0536) 1,041,963 452 0.0% 427,414 322 0.1% 100% 42,552 (4,161) (64,040) 0.0486 (0.9748) 1,216,893 584 0.0% 499,126 408 0.1% 100% 11.03% 57.20 69,642 6 0.0% 39,407 8 0.0% Urban 16,442 100% 10% 56 19,143,234 $ Urb (16,442) 100% 126 South Lakefront Light Rail Li CDOT Public 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 788 $ 2016 2034 100% x $13,185,108 High 100% 40,855 5,436 (16,902) (0.1135) (1.8386) 1,042,262 752 0.1% 427,727 636 0.1% 100% 61,557 7,603 (30,430) (0.1106) (1.9403) 1,217,300 991 0.1% 499,509 790 0.2% 100% 19.28% 61.12 69,643 8 0.0% 39,385-14 0.0% Urban (4,339) 100% 24% 59 19,487,937 $ Urb (7,812) 100% 127 Superloop Light Rail Line CDOT Public 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 482 $ 2016 2034 100% x $11,433,865 High 100% 43,852 8,198 (112,843) 0.0127 (3.1759) 1,050,490 8,980 0.9% 430,324 3,233 0.8% 100% 54,024 9,852 (141,045) 0.0099 (3.1780) 1,227,233 10,924 0.9% 502,672 3,953 0.8% 100% 23.35% 50.33 69,875 239 0.3% 39,482 83 0.2% Urban (28,971) 100% 22% 47 38,462,571 $ Urb (36,212) 100% 128 Madison Street and JacksonCDOT Public 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 248 $ 2016 2034 100% x $10,984,891 High 100% 16,776 3,540 (57,178) 0.0571 (1.6323) 1,043,777 2,267 0.2% 428,479 1,388 0.3% 100% 20,421 4,189 (73,024) 0.0625 (1.6660) 1,218,847 2,538 0.2% 500,197 1,478 0.3% 100% 21.92% 51.47 69,702 67 0.1% 39,479 80 0.2% Urban (14,680) 100% 21% 45 9,580,492 $ Urb (18,748) 100% 129 Clark Street Light Rail Line CDOT Public 100% N/A 6 Medium N/A N/A No 100% 431 $ 2016 2034 100% x $8,728,061 High 100% 47,343 2,264 (4,977) (0.1399) (2.1452) 1,042,823 1,313 0.1% 428,453 1,361 0.3% 100% 55,924 2,593 (6,122) (0.1377) (2.1807) 1,217,820 1,511 0.1% 500,208 1,490 0.3% 100% 7.13% 59.10 69,643 8 0.0% 39,414 15 0.0% Urban (1,278) 100% 6% 59 19,915,685 $ Urb (1,572) 100% 130 Downtown Ring Light Rail Li CDOT Public 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 650 $ 2016 2034 100% x $17,072,631 High 100% 11,724 2,469 (7,063) (0.0289) (1.3010) 1,042,405 894 0.1% 427,572 481 0.1% 100% 17,777 3,301 (9,957) (0.0311) (1.2962) 1,217,412 1,102 0.1% 499,303 584 0.1% 100% 36.72% 79.72 69,685 49 0.1% 39,413 13 0.0% Urban (1,813) 100% 39% 78 2,777,264 $ Urb (2,556) 100% 131 The Burnham Ring Light Rail CDOT Public 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 1,606 $ 2016 2034 100% x $37,314,433 High 100% 15,214 3,608 (19,525) (0.0387) (2.1452) 1,041,698 188 0.0% 427,360 269 0.1% 100% 23,178 5,419 (34,925) (0.0416) (0.5126) 1,216,541 232 0.0% 499,046 327 0.1% 100% 63.82% 58.29 69,646 10 0.0% 39,407 8 0.0% Urban (5,013) 100% 65% 58 1,386,732 $ Urb (8,967) 100% 132 Milwaukee Avenue Streetcar CDOT Public 100% N/A 6 Medium N/A N/A No 100% 657 $ 2016 2034 100% x $9,042,562 High 100% 24,833 (4,977) (9,323) (0.1491) 2.6074 1,054,463 12,952 1.2% 436,190 9,099 2.1% 100% 24,833 (4,977) (9,323) (0.1454) 2.6612 1,231,602 15,293 1.3% 509,103 10,384 2.1% 100% 39.17% 60.50 70,824 1,188 1.7% 39,770 370 0.9% Urban (2,394) 100% 37% 58 5,730,800 $ Urb (2,394) 100% 134 Crosstown Tollway CTA LineCTA/IDOT 87% N/A - - N/A N/A No 100% 10,000 $ 2016 2034 100% x $37,248,240 High 100% 1,069,662 28,152 2.7% 438,657 11,566 2.7% 55% 49,579 16,103 (169,400) (0.4610) (8.6218) 1,247,588 31,279 2.6% 511,760 13,041 2.6% 100% 72,273 2,637 3.8% 40,577 1,177 3.0% Urban 70% 78% 79 6,077,000 $ Urb (43,492) 100% 143 Modern Metra Electric Metra Cook 100% 3.44 - N/A 97.6 Low No 100% 1,000 $ 2016 2034 25% x $71,502,655 Medium100% 59,391 4,893 8,940 0.0393 (1.2393) 1,034,770-6,740-0.6% 425,855-1,237-0.3% 100% 135,430 11,558 (41,577) 0.1993 (0.7216) 1,206,387-9,922-0.8% 497,603-1,116-0.2% 100% 54.17% 37.63 69,404-231 -0.3% 38,676-724 -1.8% Subur 1,967 100% 57% 35 8,596,590 $ Sub (9,148) 100% 144 S.M.A.R.T. - Suburban Metro NEEDS ANALYSIS CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS 2015 TRAVEL BENEFITS 2050 TRAVEL BENEFITS 2015 PLANNING PRIORITIES 2050 PLANNING PRIORITIES (%) 2015 TRAVEL BENEFITS RTA Public 100% N/A - N/A N/A N/A No 100% 15,000 $ 2016 2034 100% x $32,601,717 High 100% 40,202 21,935 (278,494) 0.2298 (16.9611) 1,094,754 53,243 5.1% 437,724 10,633 2.5% 100% 46,311 25,288 (332,096) 0.2363 (17.4263) 1,275,072 58,762 4.8% 510,294 11,576 2.3% 100% 29.22% 55.42 72,184 2,548 3.7% 39,807 408 1.0% Subur (61,274) 100% 28% 52 38,839,667 $ Sub (73,068) 100% 147 Blue Line Capacity - O'Hare CTA CTA 43% 2.85 6 Medium 96.2 Low No 100% 1,100 $ 2017 2034 100% x ($500,000) Low 100% 0% 0% Urban - 20% Urb - 40% Project ridership (daily) Change in regional ridership (daily) Change in VMT (daily) Absolute change in avg. work trip transit travel time Wrk_time_diff (project users only) Jobs accessible within 90- minutes for average resident (#) (%) Jobs accessible within 60- minutes for average resident (#) (%) 2050 TRAVEL BENEFITS EJ Share Infill score Low barrier jobs to excluded comm. 90 min (#) (%) Low barrier jobs to excluded comm. 60 min (#) (%) GHG Type GHG emissions 2015 PLANNING PRIORITIES EJ Share Infill Score Economic impact from improved market access ($ / yr) GHG Type GHG emissions 2050 PLANNING PRIORITIES

Highway Measures Today s Needs observed condition safety mobility reliability freight benefits 2040 Performance modeled regional & corridor total CVHT regional and corridor commute time job access expected crashes regional and corridor truck CVHT Planning Priorities modeled greenhouse gas emissions development pressure in sensitive areas new impervious acres EJ job access economic impacts support infill development transit boardings

Tradeoffs

Data becomes information

Data becomes Scheduleinformation Report is being revised CMAP meets with agencies to discuss results & projects Draft list of staff recommended projects to Planning Committee in April 2018 List released for public comment in June along with draft plan The list becomes final upon plan adoption, October 2018

Questions? Claire Bozic cbozic@cmap.illinois.gov Martin Menninger mmenninger@cmap.illinois.gov