Analysis of Mobility patterns in selected University Campus Areas

Similar documents
Example of a successful campaign in the Liszki District near Kraków

24-25 May, 2018, Skiathos Island, Greece. DAStU, Politecnico di Milano, Via Bonardi 3, 20133, Milano, Italy

Andrew Winder. Project Manager ERTICO ITS Europe.

UC Santa Cruz TAPS 3-Year Fee & Fare Proposal, through

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

ECTRI. URBAMOVE URBAn MObility initiative. Claudia Nobis (DLR) TRA 2006, Göteborg, Sweden June 13 th, 2006

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

B3. Incorporating innovation - How to plan for Alternative Fuel Infrastructure

The SafeCulture project Results on safety culture in professional transport in Greece

Advanced nodes and SUMP how Parma adressed sustainable mobility in its wide area

Characteristics and causes of power two wheeler accidents in Europe

Presentation: Mobihubs in Flanders

Implementing Transport Demand Management Measures

Overview of Polis activities in electromobility. Gabriela Barrera, Polis

Painel III: Agenda Urbana e o papel das cidades no desenvolvimento sustentável. Torres Vedras. Lisboa Maio 2017

Mobility Management Mobility Centre. Karl-Heinz Posch EPOMM-Coordinator FGM deputy-director

Policy Options to Decarbonise Urban Passenger Transport

Electric vehicles in the craft sector

Consumers, Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project

E-Mobility in the City of Klagenfurt on Lake Wörthersee CEMOBIL project. Julia Zientek Austrian Mobility Research, FGM-AMOR Graz

Final Deliverable 4.5 Evaluation Comparison

Getting around the future Paris-Saclay urban campus

RUPOOL: A Social-Carpooling Application for Rutgers Students

Moscow International Transport Experts Council. Laurence A. Bannerman

Selecting the right UVAR & accompanying measures for success & how to measure it

USF Tampa Campus Percent Mode Share 2010

Electric City Transport Ele.C.Tra project. Challenges of New Urban Mobility Models Towards EU 2020 Targets

ELMOS electric mobility in smaller cities International Expert Conference 8 October 2013, Växjö, SE. Miriam Lindenau, Rupprecht Consult

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

CAN AFRICA LEAPFROG TO CLEAN AND SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY? Ms. Maletlabo Handel National Project Coordinator, UNIDO, South Africa

Parking Management Strategies

actsheet Car-Sharing

Emerging Technologies & Autonomous Vehicle Readiness Planning. Georgia Planning Association Conference Jekyll Island, GA September 5, 2018

Transportation Demand Management Element

Wyoming School Funding Model Recalibration: Transportation Reimbursement Model Study

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

Collision Types of Motorcycle Accident and Countermeasures

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

Transportation Sustainability Program

Drive Sweden. - an update on Swedish Automation Activities. Jan Hellaker Program Director.

Inventory of Best Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education

The development of the Milan transport system and the ECOPASS congestion charge

Electric Vehicles in Motion in Paris. News and development axis. ooooo. Better Transport Forum

Weaving a local web. Evaluating the effectiveness of Let s Carpool to encourage carpooling to work. Prepared for Greater Wellington Regional Council

Travel Action Plan De Montfort University

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

ELVITEN: #Let sgoelectric

Problem 14 Space for Parking E212 - Facilities Planning and Design

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

DESTINATIONS SIX ISLANDS IMPLEMENT MEASURES FOR BETTER SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY FOR TOURISTS & CITIZENS ALIKE.

GENERATING RICH TRIP DATA USING SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS TO FACILITATE FEASIBILITY STUDIES FOR BICYCLE SHARING SCHEMES

EU Interregional Cooperation

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Cycling to work. Towards a safer, more efficient and sustainable commuting. Madrid, 20 September confederación sindical de comisiones obreras

ABOUT VELOMETRO WHAT IS VEEMO? DAILY URBAN TRANSPORT SHARING SYSTEM

Robots on Our Roads: The Coming Revolution in Mobility. Ohio Planning Conference July 27, 2016 Richard Bishop

Use of mobility stations to reach a city-friendly urban mobility

Bay Campus Operations

Sustainable Mobile Cities

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

How to manage large scale infrastructures? Infrastructure planning within Toulouse s SUMP. Alexandre Blaquière. 1st December 2016

Velo-city Global 2016

Intermodality - A Solution to the Problems of Large Urban Agglomerations. Author: Eng. Eugenia Alina Roman

Final Report. LED Streetlights Market Assessment Study

Decalogue for sustainable urban transport strategy

CHAPTER 9. PARKING SUPPLY

Estimation of value of time for autonomous driving using revealed and stated preferences method

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

Akku4Future. (Acronym: Akku4Future Dis)

"Diversity In Europe. a common voice for a sustainable development" Pro-ecological Transport Solutions

Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives on the Safety Impacts and Appropriate Regulation of Electric Bicycles

WP 2 ELIPTIC Use Cases Upgrading and/or regenerating electric public transport systems (flywheel, reversible substations)

Encouraging E-bike use: the need for regulatory reform in Australia

European Bus System of the Future

ONE STOP MOBILITY IN VIENNA

Transit Hub Case Study: Owings Mills Metro Station. By: Kathleen Cary Rose, J. Luke Byrne and Catherine Buhler

NEXT. Powered by Qualtrics. 10/3/2018 Potholes & politics

Innovative Energy Actions to Increase RES Penetration and Reduce Emissions at the Port of Adamas, Milos

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

European Urban Transport Roadmaps to 2030

Short Report. June 2009

Regulation ECE Related Entries:

Energy Efficiency Transport Sector

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

SmartMove. Promoting public transport use in rural areas

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION MOBILITY PLAN FOR COMMISSION STAFF IN BRUSSELS

Climate Change. November 29, 2018 Growth Management Policy Board

Project developed under the framework of JSIP (Japan-Spain Innovation Program) for technological cooperation.

Strategic Plan

Streamlining the District s Nightlife Curbside Access. Managing High-Demand Curbside Passenger Loading Zones

SOLUTIONS Knowledge Sharing Kit Cluster 5: Network and mobility management.

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Donostia San Sebastian

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

BUS STOP DESIGN & PLANNING GUIDE

Parking Management Element

Parking Policy as a counter measure to promote public transport Case Study of Nehru Place, Delhi

Activity-Travel Behavior Impacts of Driverless Cars

Transcription:

4 th Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility CSUM2018 24-25 May, 2018, Skiathos Island, Greece Analysis of Mobility patterns in selected University Campus Areas E. Vlahogianni 1, P. Papantoniou 1, G. Yannis 1, M. Attard 2, A. Regattieri 3, F. Piana 3, F. Pilati 3 1 National Technical University of Athens 2 University of Malta 3 University of Bologna Sponsors: Media Sponsor: With the support of:

Introduction Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) define a set of interrelated measures designed to satisfy the mobility needs of people Each University Campus is similar to an urban model and in most cases could be used as a test area for mobility policies and tools Several plans and practices in universities have been conducted aiming at enhancing the general quality of urban areas in terms of mobility

Objective The objective of the present research is to retrieve quantitative data for mobility across a number of university campus areas Acknowledgment The research is based on "CAMPus sustainable University mobility plans in MED areas" research project under the Interreg Med program, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund

Selected campuses National Technical University of Athens Magna Graecia Foundation Catanzaro University University of Malta University of Valencia University of Split University of Cyprus University of Bologna

Questionnaire structure Current mobility - to present current mobility of the campus regarding mobility from/to and inside the Campus Desired Mobility - to present the desired mobility of the campus regarding mobility from/to and inside the Campus Mobility problems - to identify the mobility problems regarding mobility from/to and inside the Campus. Proposed measures/policies/tools - to evaluate specific measures Participant information including age, gender, affiliation etc.

Sample characteristics At least 100 participants per Campus based on the following characteristics: 10% Academic/Faculty 20% Administrative staff 50% Undergraduate students 20% Postgraduate students In total, 1.090 questionnaires were collected and further analysed The questionnaire's data collection took place approximately 1 month

Campuses characteristics University Location Area (m 2 ) Students Personnel Interviews 1 University of Catanzaro Outside 260.000 11.000 500 104 2 National Technical University of Athens Outside 1.000.000 13.500 3.400 124 3 University of Malta Inside 194.452 11.500 600 250 4 University of Valencia (1 campus) Outside 1.000.000 10.000 2.000 227 5 University of Valencia (2 campuses) Inside 400.000 35.000 5.000 100 6 University of Split Inside 245.000 24.000 1.500 100 7 University of Cyprus Outside 1.200.000 7.000 1.100 85 8 University of Bologna Outside 6.570.023 85.000 3.000 100

Mode of transport selection Short, Non-frequent, Inside Short, Non-frequent, Outside Short, Frequent, Inside Short, Frequent, Outside Medium, Non-frequent, Inside Medium,Non-frequent, Outside Medium, Frequent, Inside Medium, Frequent, Outside Long, Non-frequent, Inside Long, Non-frequent, Outside Long, Frequent, Inside Long, Frequent, Outside Car Public Transport Motorcycle Bicycle Walking by Trip Duration, Frequency of Traveling and Campus Location Passenger car is the preferable mode of transport in campuses located outside urban areas regardless of trip duration In campuses located inside the city the percentage of walking and cycling is significantly higher Public transport is more often reported on long trip durations in campuses located outside urban areas

Evaluation of measures for the mobility in campuses located inside urban areas Safety on crossing Increase frequencies Improve the density and extent of the public transport network Infrastructure regarding disabled people Pedestrian network Use of clean vehicle technologies Actions to improve comfort Signage and road markings Pavement maintenance ICT tools to improve information to passengers Cycling network On-street electric vehicle charging points ( e-mobility) Awareness raising activities to promote and encourage sustainable mobility Actions to implement Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Promotion of travel plans for Regions Coordination (intermodality transport) Information and advice about travel options to travelers based on ICT tools Providing parking areas and facilities for bikes Lighting conditions inside Campus Park + Bike facilities Preferential treatment for different target groups Actions to improve security Night distribution Actions to improve ticketing systems Regulation of freight transport: (delivery hours, freight restrictions) Electroning monitoring of parking spaces ICT platform for carpooling Setting up of a mobility center Setting up carpool services Use of small vehicles fleet for inside campus mobility Speed limitation zones Access restrictions in the whole campus or in parts of it Setting up public bicycle/bike sharing systems Setting up cycle rental services 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Evaluation of measures for the mobility in campuses located inside urban areas The most important measures include 4 thematic areas as follows: Walking - Safety on crossing Walking - Pedestrian network Public transport - Increase frequencies Public transport - Improve the density and extent of the network Public transport - Actions to improve comfort Road Infrastructure - Infrastructure for disabled Road Infrastructure - Signage and road markings Road Infrastructure - Pavement maintenance Environment and Energy - Use of clean vehicle technologies

Evaluation of measures for the mobility in campuses located outside urban areas Increase frequencies Coordination (intermodality transport) Improve the density and extent of the public transport network Infrastructure regarding disabled people Actions to improve comfort Signage and road markings Safety on crossing ICT tools to improve information to passengers Use of clean vehicle technologies Pedestrian network Pavement maintenance Cycling network On-street electric vehicle charging points ( e-mobility) Actions to implement Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Promotion of travel plans for Regions Lighting conditions inside Campus Actions to improve security Actions to improve ticketing systems Awareness raising activities to promote and encourage sustainable Providing parking areas and facilities for bikes Information and advice about travel options to travelers based on ICT Preferential treatment for different target groups ICT platform for carpooling Setting up carpool services Setting up cycle rental services Setting up public bicycle/bike sharing systems Setting up of a mobility center Park + Bike facilities Night distribution Speed limitation zones Regulation of freight transport: (delivery hours, freight restrictions) Use of small vehicles fleet for inside campus mobility Access restrictions in the whole campus or in parts of it Electroning monitoring of parking spaces 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Evaluation of measures for the mobility in campuses located outside urban areas The most critical measures/tools include: Public transport - Increase frequencies Public transport - Coordination (intermodality transport) Public transport - Improve density and extent of network Road Infrastructure - Infrastructure for disabled people Public transport - Actions to improve comfort Road Infrastructure - Signage and road markings Walking - Safety on crossing Public transport - ICT tools to improve information Environment and Energy - Use of clean vehicles Walking - Pedestrian network Road Infrastructure - Pavement maintenance

Conclusions Regarding campuses located inside urban areas, the most important measures concern walking, public transport, road infrastructure and environment In campuses located outside urban areas, the most important measures focus on public transport and road infrastructure Results are in line with the mobility problems that have been identified from the participants

4 th Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility CSUM2018 24-25 May, 2018, Skiathos Island, Greece Analysis of Mobility patterns in selected University Campus Areas E. Vlahogianni 1, P. Papantoniou 1, G. Yannis 1, M. Attard 2, A. Regattieri 3, F. Piana 3, F. Pilati 3 1 National Technical University of Athens 2 University of Malta 3 University of Bologna Sponsors: Media Sponsor: With the support of:

Dr. Panagiotis Papantoniou Civil Transportation Engineer ppapant@central.ntua.gr www.nrso.ntua.gr/ppapant Contact Details