Physical Scaling of Water Mist Protection of 260-m 3 Machinery Enclosure

Similar documents
Hong-Zeng (Bert) Yu FM Global International Water Mist Conference Barcelona, Spain November 14-15, 2012

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.106/Rev.6/Amend.5 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.106/Rev.6/Amend.5

NFPA 286 STANDARD METHODS OF FIRE TESTS FOR EVALUATING CONTRIBUTION OF WALL AND CEILING INTERIOR FINISH TO ROOM FIRE GROWTH

GW M5 WATER MIST NOZZLE K-5, LOW PRESSURE, NON-AUTOMATIC

Part 1: Land Applications Machinery Spaces, Industrial Hazards, Combustion & Gas Turbine Enclosures, Light & Ordinary Hazards

Research Priorities Workshop

CLASSIFICATION NOTES. Type Testing Procedure for. Crankcase Explosion Relief Valves

REPORT NUMBER: MID-001 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: Sept 27, 2013 REVISED DATE: NA

Approved for use as fixed fire extinguishing system for machinery spaces and cargo pump rooms.

Case Study: Design of a Calibration Reference Device for ANSI/ASHRAE Standard ME 4054W November 16, 2010 T. H. Kuehn SCREEN CONCEPTS

Particle size and distribution of oil mist from cooking equipments in electrical commercial kitchens

Multipulse Detonation Initiation by Spark Plugs and Flame Jets

LASTFIRE FIRE TEST SPECIFICATION WATER MISCIBLE FUELS REVISION A MAY 2015

Army Ground Vehicle Use of CFD and Challenges

Inspection of Foggers and LVM equipment in the Netherlands

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 98/P

FIRE TEST REPORT FH 5728

AIR LUBRICATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION

Powered Industrial Truck Safety Program

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY. Fume Hoods Manual. Environmental Health & Safety. April 2017

The Effects of Chamber Temperature and Pressure on a GDI Spray Characteristics in a Constant Volume Chamber

Using OpenFOAM. Chen Huang PhD student CERC. Chalmers University of Technology. 5 th OpenFOAM Workshop / June 21-24, 2010, Gothenburg

NOx-Beta Ultra Low NOx Burners

Test Report No. AJHL FB-2 Date: OCT.24, 2016 Page 1 of 6

Directional Spray Nozzles, Open, with Strainers High Velocity General Description

Type EA-1 PROTECTOSPRAY Directional Spray Nozzles, Automatic, Medium Velocity General Description

Comparative study of the flow within water mist and sprinkler fire protection systems by means of CFD

I. INTRODUCTION. Sehsah, E.M. Associate Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept Fac, of Agriculture, Kafr El Sheikh Univ.33516, Egypt

ENERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWERTRAIN AND CHASSIS INTEGRATED SIMULATION ON A MILITARY DUTY CYCLE

Comparison of Measured PFI Spray Characterizations of E85 and N-heptane Fuels for a Flex-Fuel Vehicle

Lab Safety & Energy Optimization. Introduction & Agenda

Experimental Investigation of Hot Surface Ignition of Hydrocarbon-Air Mixtures

Electrical Safety CSA Z462 & NB Regulations

System Simulation for Aftertreatment. LES for Engines

Smoke Reduction Methods Using Shallow-Dish Combustion Chamber in an HSDI Common-Rail Diesel Engine

M-11 MARINE DIESEL ENGINE FUEL INJECTOR

Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Resource ( ESDER ) Initiative

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

CONTENTS Duct Jet Propulsion / Rocket Propulsion / Applications of Rocket Propulsion / 15 References / 25

Procedure for assessing the performance of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in front-to-rear collisions

Type D3S PROTECTOSPRAY Directional Spray Nozzles, Open, Medium Velocity General Description. Technical Data. Page 1 of 6 AUGUST 2018 TFP804

Hazard in the Workplace Fire Crew Protection. Hazard in the Workplace Fire Crew Protection. David Nichols Country Fire Authority Victoria

Effects of Fuel Weathering on RVP, Distillation and Oxygen Content of Ethanol and iso-butanol Blends

Test Report No. AJHL FB Date: JUN.21, 2016 Page 1 of 6

RESOLUTION MEPC.198(62) Adopted on 15 July GUIDELINES ADDRESSING ADDITIONAL ASPECTS TO THE NOx TECHNICAL CODE 2008 WITH REGARD TO

# Gun Tube Wear Reduction for 105 mm Artillery

Monitoring of Shoring Pile Movement using the ShapeAccel Array Field

A leading engineering & scientific consulting firm dedicated to helping our clients solve their technical problems.

Summary of Reprocessing 2016 IMPROVE Data with New Integration Threshold

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 98/P

Lecture 27: Principles of Burner Design

Continuous Miner Dust Suppression. Anglo American Coal. The Problem

IMPROVED HIGH PERFORMANCE TRAYS

Test Report NO. AJHL FB Date: JUN.21, 2016 Page 1 of 6

Numerical investigations of cavitation in a nozzle on the LNG fuel internal flow characteristics Min Xiao 1, a, Wei Zhang 1,b and Jiajun Shi 1,c

NRC Non-Destructive Examination Research

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

E-15 Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS)

Optical Techniques in Gasoline Engine Performance and Emissions Development Injector Spray Visualisation

Test Report No. AJHL FB Date: OCT.26, 2016 Page 1 of 6

ASTM D4169 Truck Profile Update Rationale Revision Date: September 22, 2016

Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Environmental Technology Verification Will This Thing Really Work? Douglas VanOsdell RTI Texas Technology Showcase

Refinery Support from the R&D Laboratory Perspective using Fast & Micro Gas Chromatography

HPR activities at INFN Milan. Open Questions

Flammability Characterization of Li-ion Batteries in Bulk Storage

Rotorcraft Gearbox Foundation Design by a Network of Optimizations

TEST REPORT No. : SHCCM Date : May. 17, 2013 Page: 1 of 5

Essentials of Fire Fighting

Test Report No. AJHL FB Date: APR.06, 2016 Page 1 of 5

Draft Project Deliverables: Policy Implications and Technical Basis

TEST REPORT No. : SHCCM Date : Mar. 12, 2013 Page: 1 of 5

Special Products Catalogue 2018 Visit our new website!

PHYSICAL MODEL TESTS OF ICE PASSAGE AT LOCKS

Planned Revisions to the NIJ Ballistic Resistant Body Armor Test Standard

Notification of a Proposal to issue a Certification Memorandum. Approved Model List Changes

Combustion characteristics of n-heptane droplets in a horizontal small quartz tube

Continuous Efficiency Improvement Loop

Real time measurements of ash particle emissions. David Kittelson, David Gladis, and Winthrop Watts

R&D on Environment-Friendly, Electronically Controlled Diesel Engine

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Common Door Blast Shields

Adelaide Wind Power Project Turbine T05 (AD117) IEC Edition 3.0 Measurement Report

AARHUS UNIVERSITET FLOW BATTERIER PÅ VEJ IND I KOMMERCIEL DANSK SERIEPRODUKTION

Combustion Equipment. Combustion equipment for. Solid fuels Liquid fuels Gaseous fuels

Retrofit Crankcase Ventilation for Diesel Engines

Aging Systems Workshop Fuel Tank Safety- FINAL RULE

Quality Control in Mineral Exploration

Aerospace Propulsion Systems

Life Extension Testing of Electrical Penetration Assemblies

Foundations of Thermodynamics and Chemistry. 1 Introduction Preface Model-Building Simulation... 5 References...

Effectiveness of ECP Brakes in Reducing the Risks Associated with HHFT Trains

Quantifying Statistical Measures of Diesel Spray Soot Characteristics using Laser-Induced Incandescence

Research Update Construction Conference Charles Holzschuher, P.E. February 3, Florida Department of Transportation

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

ARGONITE Fire Protection Systems

NFPA 285 TEST REPORT. Report No.: H Test Date: June 1, Rendered to: ARCONIC ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS Eastman, Georgia

Changes to Chapter , Florida Administrative Code Underground Storage Tank Systems (USTs) Effective 1/11/2017

Accelerating the Development of Expandable Liner Hanger Systems using Abaqus

Continuous Stribeck Curve Measurement Using Pin-on-Disk Tribometer

Synthesis of Optimal Batch Distillation Sequences

Transcription:

Physical Scaling of Water Mist Protection of 260-m 3 Machinery Enclosure Hong-Zeng (Bert) Yu International Water Mist Conference October 28 29, 2015 Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Background To reduce the development and certification cost for water mist fire protection systems by conducting fire tests in scaled-down facilities. Currently, full-scale testing is required for system development and listing. Full-scale fire testing costs are often prohibitive for niche applications. Goal: To confirm the feasibility of scaling approach for approval purposes by replicating the water mist fire protection results of an already FM-Approved water mist system in a ½- scale test facility.

Outline Review of scaling relationships Full-Scale and ½-scale machinery test enclosures Full-scale and ½-scale test fires Full-Scale and ½-scale water mist sprays Test results Implementation in FM Approval Standard 5560

Froude-Based Physical Scaling of Spray-Plume Interaction In geometrically similar control volumes, conserve: 1) Froude number of gas flow Fr momentum force buoyancy force (ρ 2 ρu ρ)gl 2) Momentum transfer characteristics between water droplets and gas flow. 3) Droplet vaporization characteristics. 4) Scalar quantities in the control volumes.

Froude-Based Scaling Relationships Scaling Parameters Any Re d Re d 1* Drag Coefficient, C D ~ Re x d ~ Re -1 d Scale Ratio S=L 2 /L 1 S 1 S 1 Time S 1/2 S 1/2 All Scalar Quantities S 0 S 0 Operating Pressure S 1 S 1 Droplet and Gas Velocities S 1/2 S 1/2 Ventilation Rate S 5/2 S 5/2 Fire Heat Release Rate S 5/2 S 5/2 Total Water Mist Discharge Rate S 5/2 S 5/2 Droplet Diameter S (2-x)/(2+2x) S 1/4 *For droplets not larger than 100 µm.

260-m 3 Full-Scale Machinery Enclosure Test Facility FM Approval Standard 5560, Water Mist Systems

½-Scale Test Facility 0.85 m 1.4 m 1.4 x 2.2 m removable panel Window 0.4 x 1 m door 8 ft (2.4 m) 45 O Window 1 m 0.76 m Elevation View Side View 12 ft (3.7 m) 0.45 x 0.91 m ceiling hatches Nozzle 0.5m x 1 m x 25 mm steel plate 0.5 mm (26-gage) sheet metal 1.8 m 0.5 m 1 m 12 ft (3.7 m) 0.25 x 0.6 m high vertical baf?e Plan View Gypsum board thickness (~S 3/4 ): 9.5 mm (13 mm full scale). Machinery mockup thickness (~ S 1 ): 25 mm for table (50 mm full scale), 0.5 mm for sheet metal (0.9 mm full scale).

260-m 3 Machinery Enclosure Fire Scenarios FM Approval Standard 5560 Water Mist Systems Appendix C Heptane Fire Scenarios Fire Scenario ID C4.6 C4.7 C4.8 C4.9 C4.10 Fire Scenario Name Unshielded 1- MW Spray Fire in Full Enclosure; door Closed Shielded 1- MW Spray Fire in Full Enclosure; Door Closed Shielded 1- m 2 Pool Fire in Full Enclosure; Door Closed Shielded 2- MW Spray Fire in Full Enclosure; Door Opened Shielded 2- MW Spray Fire in Half Enclosure; Door Opened

Shielded Spray Fire Arrangement Full Scale 0.5 x 1 m high baf?e 1/2 Scale 0.25 x 0.5 m high baf?e Fuel spray nozzle 150 mm dia x 75 mm long metal cylinder Flame TC 250 mm Fuel spray nozzle 76 mm dia x 38 mm long metal cylinder Flame TC 125 mm Plan View Plan View 1 m x 2 m x 50 mm table Sheet metal 0.5 m x 1 m x 25 mm table Sheet metal 0.5 m 0.25 m TC above sampling cup 0.5 m 0.5 x 1 m high baf?e Floor TC 50 mm above sampling cup 0.25 m 0.25 x 0.5 m high baf?e Floor Elevation View Elevation View

Full-Scale and ½-Scale Heptane Spray Fires Discharge rate ~ S 5/2 Full scale ½-scale Fire Scenario ID Spray Nozzle Heptane Discharge Rate Fire Scenario ID Spray Nozzle Heptane Discharge Rate C4.6 C4.7 C4.9 C4.10 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 24 C4.6 C4.7 C4.9 C4.10 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 5.5 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 24 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 5.5 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 50 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 12 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 50 21.8 g/s 24.1 g/s 41.3 g/s 40.9 g/s Monarch F80, PLP, No. 12 3.9 g/s 4.3 g/s 7.3 g/s 7.2 g/s

Shielded Pool Fire Arrangement Full Scale 1/2 Scale 0.5 x 1 m high baf?e 0.25 x 0.6 m high baf?e 1 m x 1 m x 10 cm high pan centered below the table 0.55 m x 0.55 m x 5 cm high pan centered below the table Plan View Edge of galvanized sheet metal table Plan View Edge of galvanized sheet metal table Sheet metal 1 m x 2 m x 50 mm table Sheet metal 0.5 m x 1 m x 25 mm table 0.5 x 1.0 m high baf?e 0.25 x 0.6 m high baf?e TC in initial fuel layer Flame TC 250 mm 25 mm above pan Gas sampling TC at 1/2 of initial fuel depth Flame TC 125 mm 13 mm above pan Gas sampling Floor Floor Elevation View 460 mm Elevation View 230 mm

Full-Scale and ½-Scale Pool Fire Heat Release Rates Full scale: 1 m x 1 m x 10 cm high pan, 1.7 mm thick steel; 2 cm heptane on 5 cm deep water. ½ scale: 0.55 m x 0.55 m x 5 cm high pan, 0.9 mm thick steel; 1.5 cm heptane on 2 cm deep water. Full scale ½ scale 3500 600 Chemical Heat Release Rate (kw) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Chemical Heat Release Rate (kw) 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 Time from Ignition (s) 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Time from Ignition (s)

Comparison of Full-Scale and ½-Scale Pool Fire Heat-Release-Rate Histories Full scale Chemical Heat Release Rate x (1/S) 5/2 (kw) 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Full Scale 1/2 Scale ½-scale 0 0 100 200 300 400 Time from Ignition x (1/S) 1/2 (s) Both heat release rate and time are plotted in the full-scale coordinates.

Full-Scale Water Mist Protection Four ceiling nozzles: 4 x 4 m spacing 7.3 m 4 m 1.7 m 4 m 7.3 m 1.7 m Plan View Nozzle elevation: 0.25 m below ceiling Each nozzle consists of 6 identical orifices Total K-factor: 0.72 lpm/bar 1/2 Operating pressure: 100 bar Median droplet diameter: 79 µm

1/2-Scale Nozzle Use a ½-scale nozzle with orifices geometrically similar to those of the full-scale nozzle. Does not need additional R&D to develop Automatically meets the scaling requirement for discharge rate ~ S 5/2 d ~ S 1/3 only 6% less than the ideal d v50.

Orifice Spray Measurements Orifice K-factor: 0.12 lpm/bar 1/2, full scale 0.03 lpm/bar 1/2, ½-scale (~S 2 ) Operating pressure for measurements: 96 bar full scale 48 bar ½-scale (~S) Distance from orifice: 914 mm full scale 457 mm ½-scale (~S)

Full-Scale and ½-Scale Volume-flux-weighted Droplet Velocity Distributions Full scale: 96 bar, 914 mm from orifice ½-scale: 48 bar, 457 mm from orifice 5.0 4.5 Full-Scale 1/2-Scale 4.0 Droplet Velocity x S 1/2 (m/s) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Elevation Angle (degree)

Full-Scale and ½-Scale Gross Droplet Size Distribution Full-scale: 96 bar, d 0.5V = 80 µm ½ scale: 48 bar, d 0.5V = 65 µm (vs. 67 µm for the ideal size) 1.0 0.9 0.8 Full Scale, d v50 =80 m 1/2 Scale, d v50 =65 m Cumulative Volume Fraction 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 d/d 0.5v

Complete Full-Scale and ½-Scale Sprays Full Scale at 100 bar ½-Scale at 50 bar

½-Scale Water Mist Protection Four ceiling nozzles: 2 x 2 m spacing (4 x 4 m full-scale) 3.7 m 2 m 0.8 m 2 m 3.7 m 0.8 m Plan View Nozzle elevation: 0.13 m below ceiling (0.25 m full-scale) Each nozzle consists of 6 identical orifices Total K-factor: 0.18 lpm/bar 1/2 (0.72 lpm/bar 1/2 ) Operating pressure: 50 bar (100 bar full-scale)

Key Measurements Oxygen concentration Flame temperature Gas temperature at 1/3 and 2/3 of ceiling height, and near ceiling level 1/2-Scale Enclosure 4 ft TC tree 2.5 ft

Fire Tests Full scale: one test per fire scenario ½ scale: five tests for Scenarios C4.6 C4.9, six tests for Scenario C4.10 120 TC Temperature Near Ceiling Level ( o C) 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Data band Revise556008 Revise556009 Revise556027 Revise556038 Revise556038 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Time from Ignition (s)

Scenario C4.7 Shielded 1-MW Spray Fire Conditions Full Scale Half Scale Full or Half Enclosure Full enclosure Full enclosure Spray Fire Orientation Horizontal Horizontal Fuel Nozzle Monarch F80, PLP, No. 24 Monarch F80, PLP, No. 5.5 Nozzle Location (~S) Centered 0.5 m below the mockup table Centered 0.25 m below the mockup table Heptane Discharge Rate (~S 2.5 ) 24.1 g/s (990 kw) 4.3 g/s (180 kw) Access Door Opening (~S) 0.4 x 2 m door opening; closed 0.2 x 1 m door opening; closed Preburn Time (~S 1/2 ) 15 s 11 s Heptane Spray Duration after Extinguishment (~S 1/2 ) 15 s 11 s

Scenario C4.7 Shielded 1-MW Spray Fire O 2 Concentration (%) 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1/2 Scale Full Scale 12 0 50 100 150 1/2-Scale Time from Ignition (s) TC Temperature at 1/3 Enclosure Height ( o C) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1/2 Scale Full Scale 0 0 50 100 150 1/2-scale Time from Ignition (s) TC Temperature at 2/3 Enclosure Height ( o C) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1/2 Scale Full Scale 0 0 50 100 150 Time (s) TC Temperature Near Ceiling Level ( o C) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1/2 Scale Full Scale 0 0 50 100 150 1/2-Scale Time from Ignition (s)

Scenario C4.7 Shielded 1-MW Spray Fire Fire extinguishment time after ignition observed in full-scale test: 181 s 128 s in the equivalent ½-scale time scale Test ID ½-Scale Tests Visual Observation O 2 Concentration Flame Temperature Revise556006 125 s 134 s 122 s Revise556028 114 s 110 s 118 s Revise556035 152 s 118 s 129 s Revise556036 130 s 134 s 142 s Revise556037 126 s 131 s 138 s mean 129±18* s 125±14* s 130±13* s *95% confidence interval with statistical t-distribution.

Scenario C4.8 Shielded 1-m 2 Pool Fire Conditions Full Scale Half Scale Full or Half Enclosure Full enclosure Full enclosure Steel Pan Dimension 1 m x 1 m x 10 cm (3000 kw max.) 0.55 m x 0.55 m x 5 cm (550 kw max.) Pool Composition 2 cm heptane on 5 cm water 1.5 cm on 2 cm water Pool Location Access Door Opening (~S) Centered below the mockup table and on the floor 0.4 x 2 m door opening; closed Centered below the mockup table and on the floor 0.2 x 1 m door opening; closed Preburn Time (~S 1/2 ) 30 s 21 s

Scenario C4.8 Shielded 1-m 2 Pool Fire O 2 Concentration (%) 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1/2 Scale Full Scale 12 0 50 100 150 1/2-Scale Time from Ignition (s) TC Temperature at 1/3 Enclosure Height ( o C) 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1/2 Scale Full Scale 0 0 50 100 150 Time (s) TC Temperature at 2/3 Enclosure Height ( o C) 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1/2 Scale Full Scale 0 50 100 150 1/2-Scale Time from Ignition (s) TC Temperature Near Ceiling Level ( o C) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1/2 Scale Full Scale 0 50 100 150 1/2-Scale Time from Ignition (s)

Scenario C4.8 Shielded 1-m 2 Pool Fire Fire extinguishment time after ignition observed in full-scale test: 106 s 75 s in the equivalent ½-scale time scale ½-Scale Tests Test ID Visual Observation O 2 Concentration Flame Temperature Revise556045 84 s 88 s 79 s Revise556046 80 s 77 s 86 s Revise556049 67 s 63 s 63 s Revise556053 84 s 87 s 90 s Revise556055 85 s 82 s 88 s Mean* 80±10* s 79±13* s 81±14* s *95% confidence interval with statistical t-distribution.

Summary of Fire Extinguishment Times ½ Scale Fire Scenario Visual Observation # Oxygen Concentration # Flame Temperature # Full Scale C4.6 111±3 s 112±5 s 108±6 s C4.7 129±17 s 125±13 s 130±13 s C4.8 80±9 s 79±13 s 81±14 s C4.9 98±6 s 113±7 s 100±5 s C4.10 58±4 s 56±4 s 58±5 s 88 s (124 s)* 128 s (181 s)* 75 s (106 s)* 98 s (138 s)* 66 s (94 s)* *Observed times after ignition in the full-scale tests. #Expected 95% confidence interval with t-distribution.

Implementation into FM Approvals 5560 The physical scaling approach is being implemented in the FM Approval Standard 5560 as an alternative for the evaluation of water mist protection of machinery enclosures, and other similar occupancies. Approval process: Manufacturer applies for system approval with parameters for full-scale protection. Manufacturer submits full-scale nozzle and geometrically similar ½-scale nozzle samples to FM Approvals. FM Approvals conducts dimension measurements to ensure that all the ½-scale nozzle samples to be used for fire tests are geometrically similar to the fullscale nozzle with a designated precision requirement. FM Approvals conducts tests for all the fire scenarios with the verified ½-scale nozzles in the ½-scale test enclosure to demonstrate that the fire can be extinguished for all the fire scenarios. Approval is granted for full-scale protection by scaling up the ½-scale test results according to the scaling relationships. The required system water supply and discharge duration are assessed based on the highest water mist discharge rate and the longest fire extinguishment time determined in the ½- scale tests.

Acknowledgment Ultra Fog AB Jonathan Carpenter, FM Approvals

Questions?