Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

Similar documents
Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Public Workshop Results

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Garrett Hill Master Plan

Parking Management Strategies

PROJECT SCHEDULE. Plan for Implementation. Explore and Analyze. Refine Ideas. Identify Common Ideas SPRING 2016 SUMMER 2016 FALL 2016

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Comments_Negative_A. Neg_ScenA

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Don Elliott, FAICP Clarion Associates, Denver, CO Pace Land Use Law Conference, White Plains December 2017

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

Leveraging Land Use Changes through Transportation Funding

SUSTAINABILITY CODE AMENDMENTS ELECTRICAL VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND BICYCLE PARKING DRAFT

Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Major Widening/New Roadway

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

Transitioning to Integrated Sustainable Multi-mobility. A Model Climate Action Strategy

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Parking Management Element

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Transportation Sustainability Program

Metra Milwaukee District West Line Transit-Friendly Development Plan

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

residents of data near walking. related to bicycling and Safety According available. available. 2.2 Land adopted by

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Appendix A. Community Workshop Results PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Westside Issues Major generators: employment centers, retail, residential, recreational, UCLA, LAX Rising jobs-housing imbalance Transportation improv

Energy Technical Memorandum

Mobility 2045 Plan Workshop

SUPPORTING TOD IN METRO CHICAGO

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Incentives for Green Fleets

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

Transportation Demand Management Element

CTA Blue Line Study Area

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

Rocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION. Final Smart Growth Evaluation Report

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. February 2015

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

This letter provides SPUR s comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Public Information Workshop

Climate Change. November 29, 2018 Growth Management Policy Board

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Utilizing GIS Models in Prioritizing and Selecting Transportation Projects

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES SCOPING OF ALTERNATIVES GATEWAY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Results from the North American E-bike Owner Survey

When Do We Talk About the Future?

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT

Making Mobility Better, Together

Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program. The Ellipse, St. Louis Park, 2009

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

East Link Extension. September 16, Bel-Red Conclusion to Final Design Open House Public Involvement Summary

Halifax Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Electric Vehicle Programs & Services. October 26, 2017

This Evening s Agenda. Open House 7:00 7:30 Presentation 7:30 8:00 Community Feedback8:00 9:00 Adjourn

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Navigating in Different Rivers

Transcription:

Fresno County Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

Project Background Senate Bill 375 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Greenhouse gas emission reduction through integrated transportation & land use planning

What s a SCS? a forecasted development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network, and other transportation measures and policies, will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from light trucks and cars, to achieve, if feasible, the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets approved by the Air Resource Board Senate Bill 375

Growth Projection Planning horizon year: 2040 Population: 1,373,679 Housing: 435,375 Employment: 468,464

SCS Process

Traditional Approach The Present The Future

Scenario Approach Plausible stories about the future

Develop a Range of Scenarios A B C D

Instant Polling! - Getting Familiar with the Keypads There are no right or wrong answers! You will have a short time to review each question... Go with your gut reaction!

Let s try it...

Instant Polling! - Getting Familiar with the Keypads 1. Under 18 6% 2. 19 30 How old are you? 17% 3. 31 55 42% 4. 56 70 31% 5. 71 or older 4%

5% 6% 11% Where do you live? 1. Fresno/Clovis Metropolitan Area 78% 2. In one of the incorporated cities east of Highway 99 3. In one of the incorporate cities west of Highway 99 4. In an unincorporated rural communities

How do you get around?

When shopping or running errands I like to 1. Park within sight of each destination 19% 2. Park once and walk between shops 21% 60% 3. Walk, bike or bus to my destinations

What makes people walk? Walkable Distances

What makes people walk? Practical Destinations

What makes people walk? Pleasant and Interesting Environment, a Human Scale

Walkable Neighborhoods In most conventional suburban development, streets separate uses, discouraging walking and forcing even local trips onto arterial roads. Walkable neighborhoods have streets that connect uses, with arterials reserved for through traffic.

Have you ridden on transit in the past six months? 1. Yes 2. No 33% 67%

If you answered yes to the last question, why did you ride transit? 1. It is convenient 2. It is cheap 15% 23% 3. It is my only option 62%

If you didn t ride transit, why? 1. It is too slow 9% 24% 32% 34% 2. Doesn t serve my destinations 3. Not a pleasant experience 4. There is no stop or station close to my home

What do you think is the highest priority for transportation spending? 1. Building new and widening existing streets 7% 12% 16% 2. Improve/Increase bus service 21% 3. Build more sidewalks, bikes lanes and trails 44% 4. Improve transportation for the disabled and elderly 5. None of the above

What is the most important issue to you in the SCS process? 1. Offering different transportation choices 7% 12% 24% 2. Improve air quality 26% 31% 3. Provide increased housing choices 4. Conserve valuable farmland 5. None of the above

We have plenty of room in the region so we shouldn t worry about cities spreading out as they grow. 1% 1. Strongly agree 12% 2. Agree 7% 3. Neutral 7% 4. Disagree 11% 5. Strongly Disagree 6. Don t know 62%

I am willing to have more people live in my neighborhood so that less open space outside existing city boundaries will have to be developed. 1. Strongly agree 3% 2. Agree 3. Neutral 7% 11% 14% 4. Disagree 21% 5. Strongly disagree 6. Don t know 43%

Purpose of the Workshop Bottom-up process Input collection Public outreach

Interactive Mapping Exercises Groups of 8 to 10 will work together

Fresno/Clovis Workshop Map

Aerial

Major Roads and Highways

Land Use

West County Map

East County Map

Workshop Game Pieces Employment Types Mixed-Use Types Residential Types

Chip Menus are on your Table

Downtown Downtown: 60 acres 66 Households~ 11 hh / ac 6,300 Jobs ~ 105 jobs / ac

Business Park 2,640 feet Business Park: 160 Acres 0 Households ~ 0 hh / ac 5,440 Jobs ~ 34 jobs / ac

Strip Commercial 5,280 feet Strip Commercial: 160 Acres 0 Households ~ 0 hh / ac 2,080 Jobs ~ 13 jobs / ac

Activity Center 2,640 feet Activity Center: 160 Acres 0 Households ~ 0 hh / ac 3,040 Jobs ~ 19 jobs / ac

Industrial 2,640 feet Industrial: 160 Acres 0 Households ~ 0 hh / ac 1,440 Jobs ~ 9 jobs / ac

Mixed Use Corridor 5,280 feet Urban Corridor: 160 Acres 2,240 Households~14 hh / ac 6,080 Jobs ~ 38 jobs / ac

Is this building appropriate for the Fresno region of the future? 1. Yes 2. No 9% 3. Maybe 9% 81%

Is housing in mixed use buildings a good fit for Fresno County? 3% 1. Yes, throughout the area 9% 7% 22% 59% 2. Yes, only in Fresno and Clovis 3. Yes, only in commercial centers and along transit corridors 4. No, it is not compatible 5. I don t know

Neighborhood Center 2,640 feet Neighborhood Center: 160 Acres 2,080 Households~ 13 hh / ac 3,040 Jobs ~ 38 jobs / ac

Main Street 5,280 feet Main Street: 160 Acres 983 Households ~ 9 hh / ac 973 Jobs ~ 9 jobs / ac

Compact Neighborhood 2,640 feet Compact Neighborhood: 160 Acres 1,280 Households ~ 8 hh / ac 0 Jobs~ 0 jobs / ac

Is this housing style appropriate for the region of the future? 1. Yes 2. No 13% 3. Maybe 71% 16%

Residential Subdivision 2,640 feet Residential Subdivision: 160 Acres 800 Households~ 5 hh / ac 0 Jobs~ 0 jobs / ac

Large-Lot Subdivision 2,640 feet Large-Lot Subdivision: 160 Acres 230 Households~ 2 hh / ac 0 Jobs~ 0 jobs / ac

The Chipsets The chip sets are the physical area covered by forecasted construction Trends Continue 156 Chips Complete Neighborhoods 102 Chips There are 2 packets

The Chipsets Trends Continue 156 Chips

Chipset: Trends Job growth continues primarily outside of downtown Housing is predominantly single-family in residential subdivisions Development is primarily single-use and autooriented

Trends: 156 Chips 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Existing Trends in Development Big-box retail Large parking lots oriented to major highways

Existing Trends in Development Housing separated from shopping and jobs

The Chipsets Complete Neighborhoods 102 Chips

Chipset: Complete Neighborhoods New jobs and housing are directed downtown and along main streets Focus on neighborhood revitalization, transit, and infill Housing includes a wide mix of apartments, condominiums, townhomes and compact single family homes.

Complete Neighborhoods: 102 Chips 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Chipsets Compared Percent Walkable Chips 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Walkable Chips Trends Continue Complete Neighborhoods

Chipsets Compared Acres of Land Consumed 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 24,860 Trends 16,120 Complete Neighborhoods

The Workshop Exercise Participants build their own growth scenarios PROCESS: 1. Decide where NOT to grow 2. Choose a starter chip set 3. Arrange chips on map 4. Trade chips 5. Draw in roads and transit needed 6. Present map to group

Get Familiar with the Materials Workshop Map Markers Chipset Envelopes

Decide where NOT to grow Designate desired: Open space, green corridors and conservation areas Historic districts and other significant areas

Draw transportation infrastructure Bicycle & Pedestrian Networks Transit Roadways & Highways Especially in areas you expect to have new jobs or housing! New bike paths New bus route New roads

The Workshop Exercise Choose a Starter Set and Place Chips on Map

What if the chip is too big? Feel free to cut the chip in half, or in quarters

Experiment with Chip Arrangements Cut out chips and begin placing them in strategic locations but don t stick them down yet!

Name Your Map and Choose a Presenter

What happens after the Workshops?

Each table s plan is analyzed and recorded

Then we use the maps to build scenarios Your Input Concepts and Analysis Growth Scenarios

The scenarios are evaluated for performance Transportation Analysis Roadway Impact Ridership Owner Renter Vision 2030 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 48% 52% 150,000 100,000 Vision 2030 50,000 - SF Det SF Att MF SF Det SF Att MF 48% 52% Year 2000 Vision 2030 Market Constraints Development Program Commercial Demand Housing Needs Sustainability Urban Design Land Use Scenario Development

How can you follow up? Scenarios will be released in February, 2013 Public workshops in March/April, 2013 Policy Board adoption in April/May, 2013 www. Fresnocog.org

Fresno COG Staff Contacts RTP : Barbara Steck SCS : Kristine Cai bjsteck@fresnocog.org kcai@fresnocog.org Outreach: Brenda Veenendaal brendav@fresnocog.org www.fresnocog.org