Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Phase II (TPF-5[345])

Similar documents
SCRIM Friction Testing in the USA. Edgar de León Izeppi, Research Scientist Virginia Tech Transportation Institute Nashville, October 13 th 2,016

Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road

SPECIFICATION FOR SKID RESISTANCE INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT SELECTION

Network Level Friction and Texture in the US. Dr. Edgar de León Izeppi Research Scientist, VTTI

ASSESSMENT AND EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PAVEMENT SURFACE FRICTION. Shila Khanal, MASc.,P.Eng. Pavement Engineer

2018 NACE Conference Wisconsin Dells, WI. Joseph Cheung P.E. FHWA Office of Safety

High Friction Surfaces and Other Innovative Pavement Surface Treatments for Reduced Highway Noise

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

Motorcycle Safety Program Assessments

TOWARD SAFE AND RELIABLE ROADWAYS. Jill Ryan, MPH Eagle County Commissioner

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Traffic Standards and Guidelines 1999 Survey RSS 10. Skid Resistance

Road Surface characteristics and traffic accident rates on New Zealand s state highway network

Innovative Technology in Construction and Work Zone Safety

SAFER ROADS FOR TASMANIA GUNN S HILL PROJECT SKID RESISTANCE FIELD ASSESSMENT

NCDOT Report on Improving Safety on Secondary Roads

Performing Network Level Crash Evaluation Using Skid Resistance

What Is and Is Not High Friction Surfacing

Conventional Approach

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Automated Vehicle Research

Pavement Management Index Values Development of a National Standard. Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. TRB Straight to Recording for All. Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Median Barriers in North Carolina

Wet Accident Reduction Program (WARP) in Virginia. Bipad Saha, P.E. Pavement Design Engineer

Basics of a Good Rural Road!

Development of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development of Safety Performance Functions

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

American Center for Mobility

CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA

Overview. Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public Relations Considerations

A Vision for Highway Automation

Horizontal Alignment

Developing a Framework for Evaluating and Selecting Curve Safety Treatments. Srinivas R. Geedipally, Ph.D., P.E.

PARAPETS / RAILS / MEDIANS / SIDEWALKS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 25

Pierce Transit: Extending the Washington State Bus Transit Experience

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

SHRP 2 RID. Roadway Information Database

Future Vehicle Safety: Connected, Cooperative, or Autonomous? Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director

Runway Surface Condition Assessment and Reporting. History Behind FAA Friction Level Classifications. Federal Aviation Administration

SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1

Structural Considerations in Moving Mega Loads on Idaho Highways

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs): Challenges and Opportunities for Traffic Operations

FHWA Motorcycle Crash Causation Study

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

3-D Laser Data Collection and Analysis of Road Surface Texture

Highway Safety Countermeasures

VDOT 2008 Road and Bridge Standards Section Transition Curves

Evaluating Truck Rollover at Roundabouts on High-Speed Roads

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

PARAPETS / RAILS / MEDIANS / SIDEWALKS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 25

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

DOT HS October 2011

Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 3rd Street Tunnel at Massachusetts Avenue Exit

Fred H. Heery, Sr., P.E.

Correcting Low Asphalt Pavement Friction. Brian L. Schleppi OH DOT Office of Technical Services

TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016

Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads

CEE 320. Fall Horizontal Alignment

Robots on Our Roads: The Coming Revolution in Mobility. Ohio Planning Conference July 27, 2016 Richard Bishop

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Are we afraid of the IFI? ABSTRACT. Dr John Yeaman Pavement Management Services Pty Ltd

The effect of grinding and grooving on the noise generation of Portland Cement Concrete pavement

CRASH RISK RELATIONSHIPS FOR IMPROVED SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF ROADS

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Curve Safety Treatments. Bryan Wilson, Brad Brimley Texas A&M Transportation Institute

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

U.S. Highway Attributes Relevant to Lane Tracking Raina Shah Christopher Nowakowski Paul Green

Presentation to House Appropriations Subcommittee Committee on Budget Transparency and Reform

RAILROAD PREEMPTION FORMS. Mark Johnson, P.E.

Load Rating for SHVs and EVs

2016 Congestion Report

NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer

Reducing Speed Limits to Support Lower Skid Resistance Investigatory Levels. Fergus Tate National Traffic and Safety Manager NZTA

Chapter 12 VEHICLE SPOT SPEED STUDY

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

An introduction to the TYROSAFE project. Tyre and Road Surface Optimisation for Skid Resistance and Further Effects

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

Highway 23 New London Access & Safety Assessment. Public Open House #2 October 3, :00 to 7:00 PM

Enhanced Prediction of Vehicle Fuel Economy and Other Vehicle Operating Costs (FHWA DTFH61-14-C-00044)

DOT HS July 2012

Fatigue in Winter Maintenance Operations

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

LED Dirt Depreciation from Roadway Luminaires Dr. Ronald B. Gibbons Matthew Palmer Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

Motorways, trunk and class 1 roads and heavily trafficked roads in urban areas (carrying more than 2000 vehicles per day) C All other sites 45

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise

Managing the Maintenance of the Runway at Baghdad International Airport

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

Design For At Speed Test Diagnosis And Measurement

Target Zero: Underutilized Strategies in Traffic Safety That Work

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Transcription:

Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Phase II (TPF-5[345])

OBJECTIVES A research program focused on enhancing the level of service provided by the roadway transportation system through optimized pavement surface texture characteristics. Equipment Rodeos (at Virginia Smart Road) Technology Transfer Research on Emerging Topics Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

Annual Equipment Rodeos since 2007

Virginia Smart Road Sections Loop-A-B-C-D Sections E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L CRCP, JRCP, and bridges VTTI

VTTI labs Virginia Smart Road CRCP section RR Bridge JRCP section Smart Road Bridge

TEST SURFACES + Grooved CRCP SM 9.5 D SUPERPAVE OGFC SMA 9.5 D Cargill SafeLane Tined CRCP Tined JRCP Ground JRCP VDOT EP5LV

Chronicles Annual Equipment Rodeo activities from 2007 thru 2015 Smart Road Test Surfaces Surface Property Measurement Systems Evaluation and Comparison of Systems Special Studies Phase 1 Products 28 journal articles and conference papers/ 2 final reports Contributions to 9 other publications Presentations at 10 national and international conferences Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure

LOOKING BACK 1. Annual equipment rodeos + verification Profiler/IRI comparison testing Friction/SN comparison testing SURPRO training as requested? 2. Seasonal monitoring for friction COMPLETED 3. Evaluation & development of new technologies Macrotexture, tire pavement noise, etc. 4. Evaluation of high friction surface (HFS) systems COMPLETED 5. CFME/GripTester Technology Demonstration COMPLETED? 6. Travel Support PE 2010 Roanoke SURF 2012 Norfolk RPUG 2013 San Antonio PE 2014 Blacksburg RPUG 2015 Raleigh CFME = Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment

MOVING FORWARD 6. Travel Support (cont d) RPUG 2016 San Diego RPUG 2017 Colorado? RPUG 2018 South Dakota? 7. Friction technology transfer Locked wheel calibration Pavement Friction Management 8. Related Research Splash Spray Assessment Tool Development (FHWA) Acceptance Testing and Demonstration of CFME s (FHWA) Dynamic Hydroplaning on Roadways (NCHRP 15 55) Protocols for Network Macrotexture Measurement (NCHRP 10 98) 9. Exciting new facilities the Virginia Automation Park

The Automation Park

PHASE 1/PHASE 2 Texture Wavelength 0.1 mil 1mil 10 mil 1 / 8 in. 1 in. 1 ft. 10 ft. 100 ft. 1 m 10 m 100 m 1mm 10 mm 100 mm 1 m 10 m 100 m PIARC Category Pavement Surface Characteristic (PSC) Influence Key: Microtexture Macrotexture Megatexture Roughness Good Bad Dry Weather Friction Tire Wear TPF-5(345) Phase 2 Phase 1 Wet Weather Friction Splash and Spray Rolling Resistance Ride Quality Vehicle Wear In-Vehicle Noise TPF-5(063) Tire-Pavement Noise Source PIARC/ ISO

PHASE 2 PRIORITY Managing Pavement Friction: Reduce highway crashes and related fatalities Apply the recommendations from the AASHTO s Guide for Pavement Friction

CDC 7/6/2016 Motor vehicle crash fatalities in the U.S. could drop by half with proven strategies Lower death rates in highincome comparison countries suggest that progress is possible Introduction 14

GOOD MODEL? FHWA s Development and Demonstration of Pavement Friction Management Programs (DTFH61 09 R 00035): Assist 4 states to develop Pavement Friction Management Programs (using pavement friction, texture*, crashes, and other data) Develop and demonstrate methods Compile friction, texture, crash, traffic, other data Define friction demand categories Set investigatory levels of friction/texture FHWA Mgt.Team: Katherine Petros, Jim Sherwood, and Andy Mergenmeier 15 *Texture = macrotexture

TESTING TECH. Friction Macrotexture IMU + GPS Grade Cross slope Curvature Video (front) 2,400 gallons 150 miles of continuous data per tank Sideway Force Coefficient Routine Investigation Machine 16

MANAGING TARGETS Friction Demand Categories Investigatory Levels Road classification definitions A Interstate highways B Divided highways-no event C Two lane road-no event Q Approaches to Intersection (& roundabouts) K Pedestrian crossings and other high risk areas R Roundabout G1 Slope 5-10%, longer than 160 feet G2 Slope >10% longer than 160 feet S1 Curve radius < 1600 feet - divided roads S2 Curve radius < 1600 feet - two lane roads Investigatory level 30 mph 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65

TESTING STATUS Acceptance Testing and Demonstration of CFME/ SCRIM: Washington 575 miles Florida 875 miles Indiana 875 miles Texas 903 miles North Carolina Virginia Your State? ±500 miles ±2,000 miles? XXX miles? 18

MORE INFO? http://www.pooledfund.org/details/study/594 Becoming a partner: Kevin.McGhee@VDOT.Virginia.gov Technology, analysis, testing, etc. (i.e., questions too hard for Kevin): edeleonizeppi@vtti.vt.edu 19

QUESTIONS 20