Tank mixing systems with liquid jet mixing nozzles

Similar documents
Single-phase Coolant Flow and Heat Transfer

APPLICATION OF STAR-CCM+ TO TURBOCHARGER MODELING AT BORGWARNER TURBO SYSTEMS

Thermal Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Using Different Fin Cross Section

Numerical simulation of detonation inception in Hydrogen / air mixtures

Foundations of Thermodynamics and Chemistry. 1 Introduction Preface Model-Building Simulation... 5 References...

Hovercraft

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

COMPUTATIONAL FLOW MODEL OF WESTFALL'S 2900 MIXER TO BE USED BY CNRL FOR BITUMEN VISCOSITY CONTROL Report R0. By Kimbal A.

injection on a cold start system

Marc ZELLAT, Driss ABOURI and Stefano DURANTI CD-adapco

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF PISTON COOLING USING SINGLE CIRCULAR OIL JET IMPINGEMENT

Simulation of the Mixture Preparation for an SI Engine using Multi-Component Fuels

Applied Fluid Mechanics

Stress Analysis for Various Reactor Blade Diameters of a Mixing Process

FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY ICT REDOX-FLOW BATTERY

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW ANALYSIS IN A CLUTCH PISTON CHAMBER

Back pressure analysis of an engine muffler using cfd and experimental validation

Fundamentals of steam turbine systems

INTERCOOLER FOR EXTREMELY LOW TEMPERATURES OF CHARGING

A STUDY OF THE CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR DISCHARGE PIPELINE CONSTRAINED OSCILLATION. KIRILL SOLODYANKIN*, JIŘÍ BĚHAL ČKD KOMPRESORY, a.s.

Designing & Validating a New Intake Manifold for a Formula SAE Car

CFD ANALYSIS ON LOUVERED FIN

CFD Analysis and Comparison of Fluid Flow Through A Single Hole And Multi Hole Orifice Plate

Experimental Study on Overflow Pipe Structure of the Rod Pump with Down-hole Oil-water Hydrocyclone

Al- Ameen Engg. College. Fluid Machines. Prepared by: AREEF A AP/ ME AL AMEEN ENGINEERING COLLEGE Shoranur.

The Practical Uses of Computational Fluid Dynamics Not Just a Pretty Picture

IMPROVING BOILER COMBUSTION USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELLING

AVL Media Conditioning Systems

Cooling of plastic on metallic mandrel

Multilayer Energy Dissipating Inlet Column in Center-Feed Clarifiers 1

DESIGN OF ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL AT THE WING/PYLON/ENGINE JUNCTION

SAE Baja - Drivetrain

HERCULES-2 Project. Deliverable: D8.8

Coupled Simulation of Multiphase Fluid Flow & Multiple Body Motion: Oil Flow in a Rotating Spur-gear System

Scroll Compressor Oil Pump Analysis

MFKG Single-Shaft Continuous Mixer. Intensive mixing of fine materials

A Study on the Optimum Shape of Automobile Air Cleaner Diffuser

Porsche Engineering driving technologies

Silencers. Transmission and Insertion Loss

CFD Analysis of Oil Cooler Duct for Turboprop Aircraft Engine in Pusher Configuration

Shot Stream Generation

EFFECT OF INJECTION ORIENTATION ON EXHAUST EMISSIONS IN A DI DIESEL ENGINE: THROUGH CFD SIMULATION

CFD Analysis for Designing Fluid Passages of High Pressure Reciprocating Pump

Enhanced Heat Transfer Surface Development for Exterior Tube Surfaces

Fig 2: Grid arrangements for axis-symmetric Rocket nozzle.

University of Huddersfield Repository

International Journal of World Research, Vol: I Issue XXXVII, January 2017 Print ISSN: X

Experimental Investigation on Mixing time Analysis of Jet Mixer

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF THE ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS SIMPLE EXPANSION CHAMBER MUFFLERS

Comparative study of the flow within water mist and sprinkler fire protection systems by means of CFD

Permanent magnet brakes. Safety from the market leader. PM Line High Torque Line

Investigation of converging slot-hole geometry for film cooling of gas turbine blades

EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON PERFORMANCE OF WIND TURBINE

Analysis of a turbine rim seal cavity via 3D-CFD using conjugated heat transfer approach

CFD analysis on the aerodynamics characteristics of Jakarta-Bandung high speed train

SCHOOL OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS SEMESTER 2 EXAMINATIONS 2013/2014 ME110. Aircraft and Automotive Systems

Heat Transfer Modeling using ANSYS FLUENT

CFD ANALYSIS OF FLUID FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER IN A SINGLE TUBE-FIN ARRANGEMENT OF AN AUTOMOTIVE RADIATOR

Turbostroje 2015 Návrh spojení vysokotlaké a nízkotlaké turbíny. Turbomachinery 2015, Design of HP and LP turbine connection

HIGH VELOCITY THERMAL GUN FOR SURFACE PREPARATION AND TREATMENT. I.A. Gorlach

Miniature Ball Rail Systems

Heat Exchangers (Chapter 5)

Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Excess Air and Thermal Power Variation in a Liquid Fuelled Boiler

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 7, July-2014 ISSN

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF UNDERTRAY DIFFUSER FOR A FORMULA STYLE RACECAR

44 (0) E:

INFLUENCE OF THE NUMBER OF NOZZLE HOLES ON THE UNBURNED FUEL IN DIESEL ENGINE

Combustion Equipment. Combustion equipment for. Solid fuels Liquid fuels Gaseous fuels

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Sedan with the Rolling Road Ground Effect Simulation System

STEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC. DESIGN REPORT #1001 IBC ENERGY DISSIPATING VALVE FLOW TESTING OF 12 VALVE

FLOW CONTROL THROUGH VORTEX SHEDDING INTERACTION OF ONE CYLINDER DOWNSTREAM OF ANOTHER. Jonathan Payton 1, and *Sam M Dakka 2


Comparing FEM Transfer Matrix Simulated Compressor Plenum Pressure Pulsations to Measured Pressure Pulsations and to CFD Results

51. Heat transfer characteristic analysis of negative pressure type EGR valve based on CFD

STUDY OF NOZZLE INJECTOR PERFORMANCE USING CFD

FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT AROUND STAGGERED TUBES USING RECTANGULAR VORTEX GENERATORS

The Effect of Spark Plug Position on Spark Ignition Combustion

Performance Calculation of Vehicle Radiator Group using CFD

Mohammad Faisal Haider. Department of Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

Comparison of Swirl, Turbulence Generating Devices in Compression ignition Engine

SOLAR FLAT PLATE COLLECTOR HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN THE RAISER WITH HELICAL FINS Mohammed Mohsin Shkhair* 1, Dr.

MELT ATOMIZATION BY HEATED GASES

Engineering Success by Application of STAR-CCM+ for Modern Gas Turbine Design

Automatic CFD optimisation of biomass combustion plants. Ali Shiehnejadhesar

Aerodynamics of a UPS Delivery Truck

Advanced Design of a Ducted Propeller with High Bollard Pull Performance

Profi le rail guides LLR

a) Calculate the overall aerodynamic coefficient for the same temperature at altitude of 1000 m.

DEVELOPMENT OF A 3D MODEL OF TUBE BUNDLE OF VVER REACTOR STEAM GENERATOR

Simulation Analysis Spray of the Butanol and Diesel Fuel Mixed with Injection Pressure and Air Flow Intensity

INVESTIGATION OF HEAT TRANSFER CHARACTERISTICS OF CIRCULAR AND DIAMOND PILLARED VANE DISC BRAKE ROTOR USING CFD

11/12/2017 Erwin H. Doorenspleet

Mixture Preparation in a Small Engine Carburator

THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF AIRCRAFT BRAKING SYSTEM

Virtual Flow Bench Test of a Two Stroke Engine

V&V Exercise for a Solar Tower Power Plant

Flow and Heat Transfer Analysis of an Inlet Guide Vane with Closed-loop Steam Cooling

Analysis of Exhaust System using AcuSolve

Figure 1: The spray of a direct-injecting four-stroke diesel engine

Effect of concave plug shape of a control valve on the fluid flow characteristics using computational fluid dynamics

Transcription:

Tank mixing systems with liquid jet mixing nozzles

Liquid jet mixing nozzles Körting liquid jet mixing nozzles are the main components of tank mixing systems which can be applied for continuous as well as discontinuous mixing purposes. They can be used as complete replacement for mechanical agitators and in many cases they surpass their mixing results. Working principle A liquid flow is taken from the tank and supplied to the liquid jet mixing nozzles via a pump. Inside the motive nozzle pressure energy is converted into kinetic energy. Negative pressure is generated at the motive nozzle outlet and the ambient liquid is sucked in. The suction flow is strongly intermixed with the motive flow in the adjoining mixing section and accelerated by impulse exchange. The drag effect of the exiting mixed flow increases the mixing effect significantlly. motive flow entrainment suction flow Operation Mixing nozzles consist of a motive nozzle and a mixing section. The liquid motive medium introduced under pressure via the motive connection is usually taken from the tank and delivered into the liquid jet mixing nozzle by means of a pump mounted outside of the tank. In the motive nozzle the static pressure of the motive medium is converted into velocity generating a corresponding negative pressure at the suction openings which is utilised to draw in the so-called suction flow. Suction and motive flow are intermixed intensively in this turbulent region at the motive nozzle outlet as well as in the adjoining mixing section and are subsequently supplied into the tank as mixed flow. The volume ratio between suction and motive flow is about 3:1. The mixed flow exits the mixing nozzle with relatively high velocity and encounters the liquid contained in the tank, which is subsequently entrained as a result of the mixed flow s drag effect, so that finally the sum of motive flow, suction flow and drag flow keeps the liquid inside the tank moving. The volume ratio between entrainement and motive flow is between 12-80. So with 1 m³/h pumped up to 80 m³/h are moved. Application prerequisites and limitations Motive flow and suction flow are mixed in the mixing section behind the motive nozzle, so that a homogeneously mixed liquid jet develops in the mixing section due to high turbulence resulting from motive and suction flow. In case of liquids with physical properties like water, a mixing ratio of motive flow to suction flow is 1:3. On account of its velocity and of the dragging jet effect resulting therefrom, the mixed flow leaving the liquid jet mixing nozzle carries forward so much surrounding liquid that the used motive flow is multiplied. In case of liquids with higher viscosity the mixing ratio and the dragging effect are decreased. The limiting range for applying liquid jet mixing nozzles is reached when the viscosity of the liquid to be circulated does not allow a delivery with centrifugal pumps anymore. The motive flow passed through the liquid mixing nozzles of a certain size depends on the efficient motive pressure. If the motive liquid is removed from the mixing tank this efficient motive pressure is to be equated with the delivery head of the centrifugal pump after deduction of all pipe friction losses. In case where the motive liquid is not to be removed from the mixing tank the liquid column above the liquid jet mixing nozzles outlet is to be taken into account for determining the efficient motive pressure. Tanks from 1 m³ to 100,000 m³ can be equipped.

Size Metals Available from stock. All other materials and different sizes on request. Polymers Stainless Steel GJS PP PTFE G 3/8 G 3/4 G 1-1/2 G 2 G 3 Applications Liquid jet mixing nozzles are suiteable for all kind of tanks: storage tanks, e.g. for edible oil, fuel, oil, waste water reactors neutralisation tanks SBR tanks as discharge support Application example: Installation in a waste water tank

Structure and function of tank mixing systems The aim of Körting Hannover AG is to design customised tank mixing system solutions for each specific tank. The purpose of the tank mixing system is to generate a liquid circulation of the whole liquid volume which leads to complete mixing and prevents sedimentation. A guided directional flow will be generated by the mixing system. Therefore, flow velocities occur, which are higher than the sinking velocities of the particles in the liquid, so that settlement is avoided. The two examples in the figures below illustrate the principle of tank mixing systems: The specific number of liquid jet mixing nozzles resulting from the tank mixing system dimensioning will be placed on two pipes close to the tank bottom and the tank wall. These two pipes follow the shape of the tank. For a round tank the pipes are semicircular whereas for a rectangular tank the pipes are straight. The required motive flow is supplied to the liquid jet mixing nozzles via these pipes. The motive flow pipes are situated oppositely to each other at two sides in the tank. Supply pipes can either be fixed on the tank wall or on the tank bottom. Pipe dimensioning will be according to normal flow velocities in order to keep the friction losses inside the pipes low. The size of each mixing nozzle, its alignment, e.g. the installation angle as well as the distance from one nozzle to another, are further results of the dimensioning. One nozzle row will point alongside the tank bottom to generate the necessary flow velocities alongside this area. At the opposite side of the tank the second nozzle row points upwards which generates an upward flow alongside the tank wall. By means of this guided directional flows the whole liquid volume is moved. In order to save energy at low filling levels the nozzle row pointing upwards can be switched off. Dependent on the properties of the liquid to be mixed every different nozzle size has a certain range with regard to the liquid to be moved. For very large tanks it may be necessary to place further nozzle rows in the middle of the tank bottom in order to generate the required flow velocities to cover the whole distance. In case of very high tanks the nozzle row pointing upwards may be positioned higher above the tank bottom to achieve optimum mixing of the whole liquid. With the options of choosing different nozzle sizes, adjustment of nozzle rows according to the tank shape, modification of the nozzle distances and of being flexible concerning the operation of the different nozzle rows Körting Hannover AG is able to dimension the optimum tailor made tank mixing solution for every specific purpose. E.g. for full homogenisation, for prevention of settlements, for prevention from different temperature layers or for complete mixture of different liquids.

Properties of a tank mixing system for edible oil The images below give a good impression of a complete tank mixing system in a storage tank for edible oil. 17 mixing nozzles made of stainless steel are installed nearly horizontally whereas 17 mixing nozzles are installed nearly vertically at the opposite side of the tank. The tank volume is 11 000 m³ with a filling height of 25 m and a diameter of 24 m. Example (cylindrical storage tank) V = 11 000 m³ H = 25 m, D = 24 m 34 mixing nozzles (stainless steel 2 ) Alignment of a mixing system in a cylindrical storage tank for edible oil The result of the Körting design is a sketch for the customer, which contains recommendations and information, so that the mixing system will be installed in the tank in an optimum way. In order to evaluate critical cases Körting Hannover AG uses CFD simulation ( Computational Fluid Dynamics ). Advantages no maintenance in the tank complete mixing of the tank content low investment costs low energy input no unmixed dead zones wear-resistant operation no sealing problems Example of energy saving potential by using Körting mixing systems: Tank dimensions diameter = 27.6 m filling height = 10 m filling volume = 5 983 m³ Energy consumption for mixing with conventional mixing system = 10 W/m³ for mixing with Körting mixing system = 4 W/m³ energy saving potential = 6 W/m³ Calculation 6 W/m³ * 5 983 m³ = 35.9 kw (35 898 W) 35.9 kw * 8 760 h/a = 314 484 kwh/a 314 484 kwh/a * 8.6 Ct/kWh = 27 046 /a 8.6 Ct/kWh = electricity costs for industrial customers in Germany, value for 2013 The potential savings of energy costs are approx. 27 000 per year

CFD basics When using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model for mixing systems some helpful simplifications are used: steady state modelling (not transient) turbulent flow modelled with two equation turbulence model numerical grid with tetrahedral cells smooth liquid surface modelling of pipings and support plates, if required Numerical set-up for a storage tank (D = 68 m, H = 23 m) mixing nozzles: 60 x 2 tank volume: 80 000 m³ generating a CAD file creating a numerical grid solving the conservation equations post process results Numerical flow simulation The aim of the numerical tests carried out is an optimum arrangement of the mixing nozzles inside the tank with regard to the a.m. design strategy. The tests are based on a liquid-filled tank. Various combinations of flow medium and tank geometry can be optimised for customer specific tests per CFD by selecting corresponding physical material characteristics of the flow medium resp. special geometry requirements. The tank geometry to be tested is simulated by means of a CAD program. Digital geometry information of the individual mixing nozzles is imported directly from CAD systems used in the design process. Number, position and alignment of the simulated mixing nozzles inside the tank are determined, so that the complete tank con fi gu ration can be simulated digitally. The whole simulated geometry consisting of all liquid jet mixing nozzles and the tank with pump connection is converted to a calculation grid by means of a so-called grid generator which is the basis of the CFD. The fluidic fundamental equations are solved for each of the cells generated within the grid. Primarily, these are the conservation equations for mass, impulse and energy. Two further conservation equations will be solved in order to consider the turbulence caused by the liquids. All conservation equations are solved by means of the so-called equation resolver. In order to simplify the calculations they are based on stationary flow conditions. The whole simulation process from the grid generation up to the representation of the results takes place automatically for the most part. On the one hand, geometrical boundary conditions for the simulation are the tank dimensions (filling height H, diameter D, lenght L, width W) as well as the position and size of the pump connections and on the other hand the number, position and alignment of the liquid jet mixing nozzles. Operational boundary conditions are determined by the motive pressure at the liquid jet mixing nozzle and the physical properties of the motive flow. 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 Geometrical set-up of the mixing system Installation position Optimisation of the liquid flow 0.00 Velocity [m s-1]

Examples of CFD calculation results Edible oil tank H = 30 m; D = 19 m mixing nozzles 32 x 2 tank volume 8 500 m³ motive flow rate 790 m³/h liquid density 910 kg/m³ liquid viscosity 35 mpas mixing power 5.2 W/m³ average liquid velocity 0.17 m/s Edible oil tank H = 14,6 m; D = 42 m mixing nozzles 25 x 2 tank volume 20 200 m³ motive flow rate 770 m³/h liquid density 900 kg/m³ liquid viscosity 50 cpoise mixing power 4.2 W/m³ average liquid velocity 0.09 m/s Quench tank H = 5 m; D = 9,2 m mixing nozzles 18 x ¾ + 74 x 2 tank volume 330 m³ motive flow rate 1 900 m³/h mixing power 320 W/m³ average liquid velocity 0.8 m/s Nozzle distribution Water flow in a cylindrical quench tank Fuel oil tank L = 16 m; D = 2,9 m; Filling height = 2,6 m tank volume 60 m³ motive flow rate 12.8 m³/h average liquid velocity 0.24 m/s Liquid flow in a horizontal tank

Körting Hannover AG Badenstedter Straße 56 30453 Hannover Germany Tel.: +49 511 2129-221 Fax: +49 511 2129-223 st@koerting.de www.koerting.de 130-Mixing nozzles-en-171024