[Report Title] [Report Tag Line]

Similar documents
TTS 2016 DATA GUIDE FEBRUARY

GTA A.M. PEAK MODEL. Documentation & Users' Guide. Version 4.0. Prepared by. Peter Dalton

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

HALTON REGION SUB-MODEL

Appendix D. Brampton 2006 P.M. Peak Model Report

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

American Driving Survey,

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Table of Contents. 1.0 Introduction Demographic Characteristics Travel Behaviour Aggregate Trips 28

GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY PROGRAMME CLINICAL / RESEARCH BULLETIN NUMBER 16

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

GO TRANSIT POLITICAL ACTION TASK FORCE AGENDA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, :00 P.M. CHARLIE WARD ROOM, BRANTFORD CITY HALL

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

CONNECTING THE REGION

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

House Committee on Transportation Policy Public Hearing HB April 5, 2017

Motorcycling. New Zealand Household Travel Survey October 2015

INTERACTIVE COMMUTE MAP CLICK ON YOUR CITY OF RESIDENCE ON THE MAP BELOW TO EXPLORE YOUR COMMUTE OPTIONS

FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION OF ONTARIO. Filing Guidelines for Automobile Rate Manuals

PEG. Pacific Economics Group, LLC Economic and Litigation Consulting EFFICIENCY RANKING AND COHORTS FOR THE 2009 RATE YEAR

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Future Needs Assessment Report

Motorcoach Census. A Study of the Size and Activity of the Motorcoach Industry in the United States and Canada in 2015

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016

New Zealand Transport Outlook. VKT/Vehicle Numbers Model. November 2017

APPENDIX 6: Transportation Modelling Considerations City of Toronto, February 2014

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

LRT Preferred to Subway in Scarborough

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

Ontario Employment Insurance Trends

City Transfer Stations: Loading Services and Fees

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Building a Database for Estimation of an Advanced Activity-Based Travel Model from the NHTS

Parking Studies. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Vers. 2.3 travel model, trip generation: Development of trip production model

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

What do people know about their public transport options?

March 21, Mr. James F. Brown, P.Eng. Director, Infrastructure EnWin Utilities Inc. 787 Ouellette Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9A 5T7

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

Motorcoach Census 2011

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

Review of Fees for Accident Tows and Tows from Private Property

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Image from:

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

A SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY FUTURE Rethinking Transit Solutions Presented by Jonathan Chai & Elli Papaioannou HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

REPORT TITLE: DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SERVICE IN THE EXECUTION OF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT. Dan Labrecque, Commissioner of Public Works

Public Transit in America:

Kauai Resident Travel Survey: Summary of Results

The Regional Transportation Plan PLAN BUILD OPERATE

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF WATERLOO

Non-standard motorcycle helmets in low and middleincome

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15, Schedule B;

Weaving a local web. Evaluating the effectiveness of Let s Carpool to encourage carpooling to work. Prepared for Greater Wellington Regional Council

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

2012 Water Consumption Statistics Report. Water Services Department

Economy. 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29%

2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

Tarrant County Projected Population Growth

3 Award of Contracts for the Supply of Vehicle Tires

Preliminary 2014 Ontario Road Safety Annual Report Selected Statistics

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 910, PARKING MACHINES AND METERS. Chapter 910 PARKING MACHINES AND METERS 1. ARTICLE I Parking Machines

DS Discussion Paper. for the Next Regional Transportation Plan GREATER TORONTO AND HAMILTON AREA AUGUST 2016

Parking Management Element

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo and Guelph CMAs

Transcription:

[Report Title] [Report Tag Line] TTS 6 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL SUMMARY BY WARD MARCH 8 Bess Ashby, Research Director 5 Yonge St. Toronto, ON M5B E7 Phone: (6) 6-6 ext. E-mail: b.ashby@malatest.com www.malatest.com

March 8

TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... FURTHER INFORMATION...5 BACKGROUND...6 AREA OF COVERAGE...7 SURVEY MAGNITUDE...8 SURVEY CONTENT...9 REPORT CONTENT... DATA KEY... AREA SUMMARIES... GREATER TORONTO HAMILTON AREA... REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL... 5 TOWN OF CALEDON... 6 WARD... 7 WARD... 8 WARD... 9 WARD... WARD 5... CITY OF BRAMPTON... WARD... WARD... WARD... 5 WARD... 6 WARD 5... 7 WARD 6... 8 WARD 7... 9 WARD 8... WARD 9... WARD... CITY OF MISSISSAUGA... WARD... WARD... 5 WARD... 6 WARD... 7 WARD 5... 8 WARD 6... 9 WARD 7... WARD 8... WARD 9... WARD... WARD... March 8

P a g e Acknowledgements The 6 (TTS) was conducted on behalf of local, regional, provincial and transit operating agencies in the Greater Toronto and surrounding regions. The members of the TTS Technical Committee are represented by the following agencies: City of Barrie City of Brantford City of Guelph City of Hamilton City of Kawartha Lakes City of Peterborough City of Toronto County of Brant County of Dufferin County of Peterborough County of Simcoe County of Wellington Metrolinx Ministry of Transportation, Ontario Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of Waterloo Regional Municipality of York Toronto Commission Town of Orangeville This report was prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee (TISC) by R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd., in partnership with David Kriger Consultants Inc. and HDR Inc., with guidance from the Data Management Group (DMG) at the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto. The Steering Committee, formerly known as the Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee(TATPDCSC), which also conducted the 986, 99, 996,, 6 and TTS, is represented by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Cities of Toronto and Hamilton, Regional Municipalities of Durham, Halton, Peel and York, Metrolinx and the Toronto Commission. The contributions of the above supporting agencies to the production of this report and to the ongoing work of the DMG are gratefully acknowledged. March 8

P a g e 5 Further Information The (TTS) are parts of an ongoing data collection program by the Transportation Information Steering Committee (TISC). The survey data (6,, 6,, 996, 99 and 986) are currently under the care of the Data Management Group. This group is responsible for maintaining the TTS databases and making available appropriate travel information for any urban transportation study in the area. Requests for information from the TTS, or enquiries related to the contents of this report, should be directed to the address below. Data Management Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto 5 St. George Street Toronto, Ontario M5S A Tel: (6) 978-9 Fax: (6) 978-9 Email: info@dmg.utoronto.ca Web: www.dmg.utoronto.ca March 8

P a g e 6 Background The first comprehensive travel survey was the 96 Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study (MTARTS), which was an urban travel survey using home interviews at a sample of approximately of the households in the Toronto area. that time, the survey area included most of the urban area. Subsequently, the urban area expanded and was subdivided into a collection of regional jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction then undertook various travel surveys. Urban travel on the road and transit system does not respect jurisdictional boundaries. A committee established to discuss common transportation issues at the time of jurisdictional changes recognized this limitation. The first Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) initiated by the coordinating committee (Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee) was undertaken in 986 when it was recognized that the fragmented approach to collecting urban travel information was not providing a complete representation. The extensive use of the original TTS data led to the establishment of periodic updates and consequently a Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) has been conducted every five years since 986. From 986 to 6, the survey method remained essentially the same: the survey sample was drawn from telephone subscriber directories, with advance letters sent to inform households about the survey, and surveys conducted via telephone interview. In, online surveying was introduced to supplement the telephone interviewing, with of participating households completing the survey online. In 6, the survey sample was drawn from Canada Post s database of mailable addresses, which was matched, where possible, to telephone numbers listed in the telephone subscriber directory. Addresses not matched to a telephone number received a survey letter inviting them to participate online or via phone while addresses matched to a telephone number received both a letter and telephone calls. In this cycle, 6 of participating household completed the survey via telephone interview and 6 completed the survey online. The survey questionnaire has been essentially the same in all survey cycles, with only minor changes between cycles. The 6 (TTS) is the seventh in a series of comprehensive travel surveys conducted every five years in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) and surrounding areas. The TTS contains detailed demographic information on all members of a surveyed household and a ledger of travel information for an entire weekday. March 8

City of Hamilton City of Toronto Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of York City of Kawartha Lakes City of Barrie City of Brantford City of Guelph City of Orillia City of Peterborough County of Brant County of Dufferin County of Peterborough County of Simcoe County of Wellington Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Municipality of Waterloo Town of Orangeville P a g e 7 Area of coverage As the urban area surrounding Toronto continued to grow and surrounding communities became more integrated, it was apparent that a wider area of coverage would be beneficial. The initial TTS programs in 986 and 99 were initiated by government agencies in the GTHA and the area of coverage reflected that initiative. However, because of the growing urban transportation interaction between the GTHA and the surrounding areas, other surrounding communities were invited to participate in later surveys. PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Cycle 6 TTS p p TTS p p 6 TTS p p TTS p p 996 TTS p p p 99 TTS 986 TTS = full coverage, p = part of jurisdiction March 8

P a g e 8 Survey magnitude In the 6 survey, a random sample of households in the survey area was provided by Canada Post from a database of mailable residential addresses. In all previous surveys from 986 to, the random sample of households in the survey area was provided by a telephone subscriber listing service. In 6, the size of the sample was determined as required to obtain a 5 sample of occupied dwelling units in all areas except the City of Hamilton, for which a sample of occupied dwelling units was targetted. In 99, a smaller sample was obtained in developed urban areas. Otherwise, the size of the sample was determined as required to obtain a 5 sample of the occupied dwelling units. RECORDS AND ESTIMATES FOR TORONTO Cycle Records Expanded total Records Expanded total Records Expanded total 6 TTS 6,78,5,99 95,885 8,8,8 798,9 7,5,78 TTS 59,,7,5, 8,5, 858,8 7,9, 6 TTS 9,6,87,,7 7,75, 86, 6,5,7 TTS 6,,7,5 7, 6,59,6 87,7,,6 996 TTS 5,,7,,8 6,85, 658,,85,5 99 TTS,5,79,6 7,5,79, 57,,, 986 TTS 6,,66, 7,,6, 7, 8,76, March 8

Dwelling unit type Number of Available hold Income Gender Possession of Driver s License Usual Place of Work Location Usual Place of School Location Free Parking at Usual Place of Work Possession of Occupation Type Work at Start time Purpose of Trip Origin and Destination Points Travel Mode Vehicle Occupancy Used 7 ETR Detailed Routes & Subway Stations used P a g e 9 Survey content All TTS are a retrospective survey of travel taken by every member (age of over) of the household during the day previous to the telephone (or web) contact. Until, all information was collected by an experienced interviewer over the telephone. In and 6, the household was given the option of a telephone interviewer or completing the interview on-line. The information collected and the method of collection has remained relatively consistent over the seven surveys and includes characteristics of the household, characteristics of each person in the household, and details of the trips taken by each member of the household. Trip information includes details of any trips taken by transit. Before each survey, the questions asked were reviewed and some additions made, which reflect the changing interests of the participating agencies. hold Characteristics INFORMATION COLLECTED Demographic Information Travel Information Person Characteristics Nature of Trip Means of Travel 6 TTS TTS 6 TTS TTS 996 TTS 99 TTS 986 TTS March 8

P a g e Report content The purpose of this report is to summarize the data at the Ward level for the Regional Municipality of Peel. The summary is presented in tabular format at different levels of detail, namely the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, the Regional Municipality of Peel, and the wards within each of the municipalities within this region. In total, there are 5 wards within the Town of Caledon; wards within the City of Brampton; and wards within the City of Mississauga. The information presented includes socio-demographic and travel characteristics. In addition to presenting the magnitude of the trips coming into and leaving an area, the summary tables also describe travel characteristics such as travel purpose, trip start time, travel distance and travel mode choice. For historical TTS data, please refer to the 6 reports, 6,, 6, 996, and 986 Travel Summaries for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area and the 6,, 6, 996, and 986 Travel Summaries for the TTS Area. It may be noted that in the latter report on the GTHA, the 6 statistics for trips made to GTHA municipalities may not always match the trips made to statistics reported herewith for the same municipalities. This is because the trips made to statistics in the GTHA report have been filtered to only trips made by residents of the GTHA to facilitate historical comparisons with previous survey cycles (which in 986 and 996 were confined to the GTHA), whereas the trips made to statistics reported herewith include all trips made by residents of the entire TTS study area, which extends beyond the GTHA for all cycles since 996, with some variation by cycle in the extent of the geography outside the GTHA. (See Area of coverage on page 7 of this report.) Two time periods are reported: the morning peak travel period of 6: to 8:59 a.m. and the full -hour day (labelled in the tables as 6-9 A.M. ). In the 6 results, medians of trip distances are determined based on all trips, including those with trip ends outside of the study area. In earlier cycles, median trip distance calculations excluded trips with trip ends outside the study area (as there was less precision in the geocoding of coordinates external to the study area). To reflect the fact that all numbers presented in this report are estimates based on expanded survey data, all numeric figures are rounded. Totals and subtotals are rounded to the nearest for all data presented in this report. Most percentages are rounded to the nearest integer. No information is presented for categories that have less than four observations or survey records. These categories are denoted by an asterisk (*). Invalid survey responses are dealt with in two ways. The response is grouped under the other category if one is available (travel mode, for example). Otherwise, invalid responses are distributed proportionately (based on the valid responses) between the available categories. Definitions of terms are listed on the next page. For complete and detailed coverage of all aspects of the surveys, please refer to the reports available at: http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/reports/ttsreports.html March 8

P a g e Data Key Total number of households in the area Dwelling Type Distribution of households by dwelling type: house, townhouse, or apartment. hold Size Distribution of households by the number of persons in residence at the time of the survey interview. Number of Available Distribution of households by number of vehicles available to the household for personal use. hold Averages: /household Total population divided by total number of households. s/household Total number of employed persons (full-time, part-time, work-from-home) divided by total number of households. /household Total number of persons in possession of a driver s licence divided by the total number of households. The calculation excludes a small portion of households for which the total number of licensed drivers was unknown. /household Total number of vehicles available for personal use divided by the total number of households. /day/household Total number of daily trips made by persons of age and over divided by the total number of households. Total population residing in private dwellings in the area at the time of the survey. Excludes residents living in collective dwellings (who were not surveyed). Distribution of population by age group. Note: may not exactly match census distributions exactly. Approximately of persons 7 are assumed to live in collective dwellings and are not represented by the survey results. 5 of the population are above and 5 are below the median age. Daily per Person Number of trips made by persons aged and over divided by the number of persons aged and over. Daily Work per Number of work trips made by employed persons divided by the number of employed persons. time outside the home, part-time outside the home, work at home (full-time or part-time). of population who are students. status was not asked for persons aged 6-, but was assumed. of population with a valid driver s licence. with unknown licence status were excluded from the calculation. of population in possession of a valid transit pass. with unknown data were excluded from the calculation. TRIPS MADE......BY RESIDENTS OF THE Survey statistics for all trips made by population residing within the given geography reported on. AREA...TO THE AREA Survey statistics for all trips with a destination within the given geography reported on, whether made by residents of the given geography or by residents of all other geographies included in the entire TTS survey area. Two time periods are reported: the morning peak travel period of 6: to 8:59 a.m. (labelled as 6-9 AM ) and the full -hour day. Total estimated average trips for the reported time period on weekdays (estimates based on the survey data expanded to represent the total population). Trip Purpose (for trips made by residents of the area): Distribution of all trips made by residents across the following categories: HB-W -based work: to work and work to home. HB-S -based school: to school and school to home. HB-D -based discretionary: All other home-based trips. N-HB Non-home-based: All trips where neither end is home. Trip Purpose (for trips to the area): Distribution of all trips made to the area across the following categories: Work Destination purpose is work. School Destination purpose is school. Destination purpose is to return home. Other Other destination purpose, such as shopping, entertainment, pick someone up/drop someone off, etc. Modes of travel: Driver Automobile driver.. Automobile passenger. Public transit (local transit). If a trip uses more than one mode category which includes public transit, then public transit is given preference as the primary mode. In cases where both and local transit were used, is the dominant classification.. In cases where both and local transit were used, is the dominant classification. Walk & Cycle Walk or bicycle. Other Other modes of travel. Includes motorcycle, taxi, school bus, and all other modes. Trip Length (km) Trip length is measured as the straight line distance between the origin and destination coordinates of the trip, and is reported for trips with the following modes: driver, passenger, transit, and. March 8

P a g e March 8

P a g e Area summaries March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e GREATER TORONTO AND HAMILTON AREA GREATER TORONTO HAMILTON AREA Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,5,6 5 5 9 7 7 6 8.7.5.8. 5.,,6 6 7 7 9 6,8,9 6 8 7 9...75,5, 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF THE GTHA Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,59,.6 5 9 9 57 5 8..5 7.9. Hrs,6,7 5 9 5 6 9 6.5. 6.8.5 TRIPS MADE TO THE GTHA BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,7,.8 56 5 9 58 5 8..5 7.9. Hrs,6, 6 9 6 9 6.6. 6.8.6 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 5 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 59 8 6 9 9 7 6..7..7 5.8,5, 7 8 6 7.9..75 66,7 6 7 5 69 688,5 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 66, 6.5 7 9 6 8 8 5 8.9.. 7.7 Hrs,95, 7 7 67 8 6 7..5 8.7 7.6 TRIPS MADE TO REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 6, 6. 5 7 9 68 6 8 5 9.6. 6.9 9. Hrs,6,6 6 6 69 7 6 7.6. 7.5 7. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 6 TOWN OF CALEDON Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 89 7 9 9 5 5 8 9..9.. 6.,6 9 6 7 65,6 8 9...7, 6 6 7 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,5 5.6 55 6 7 7 8.9 9.5. 8. Hrs 7, 7 5 5 77 6 5..8 9.9 8. TRIPS MADE TO TOWN OF CALEDON BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5,7. 5 5 65 * 7.8 7. 7. * Hrs 6, 8 5 7 8.6 9.6 9.8 8. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 7 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 97 8 6 5 9.9.8.. 6.,8 7 77 5 9,6 9 9 5 6 6...65,8 8 7 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,.7 5 6 7 6 7 7 * * 8 7. 9.5 * 5.8 Hrs 9,7 9 9 77 8 7.8.9.6 5.8 TRIPS MADE TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,6. 59 5 6 9 69 * * * 8 7.8 9. * * Hrs,6 66 7 7 8 8.5..9 5.8 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 8 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,6 88 7 9 7 5 9..9.. 5.9 7, 5 5 69 6 5, 6 7 9 6 6...8 7,7 7 67 8 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 7,6 8. 56 9 5 9 7. 7. 8.6 7.7 Hrs 7, 78 7.9 7.9 8.8 7.7 TRIPS MADE TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 6,9 5 9 * 8.9 7. 7. * Hrs,9 6 5 8 7. 7.8 8.8 7.7 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 9 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 8 6 5 9 8 6 9 7.8.5...6, 7 5 7,8 9.9..8,8 6 6 9 75 8 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,. 76 5 * * 8 * * * * 9. * * * Hrs 6, 8 9 87 5 * *.. * * TRIPS MADE TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM, 9. 8 5 * 9 6 * * * 7 9.6 8. * * Hrs 6, 8 9 76 * *. 9.5 * * March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,7 9 5 7 5 5 6 5 5....5 6. 7, 9 8 78,9 9.7..7 7,6 6 9 7 5 7 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 7,6 5.6 5 7 9 7 *. 9. * 8.7 Hrs 9,9 6 5 5 79 7 6.7 5. 9.9 8.7 TRIPS MADE TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,5 8. 5 7 5 6 * * 9 8.6 9.5 * * Hrs 9, 7 66 75 * 9 6.6.6 * 8.7 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD 5 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 7, 85 8 7 6 8 5 6..8.. 6., 5 6 5 7, 8 5 9...7, 7 5 7 5 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 5 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,8 6.7 5 7 6 7 7 9 8...7 7.9 Hrs, 7 6 7 6 5 5. 9.5. 7.9 TRIPS MADE TO TOWN OF CALEDON - WARD 5 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,5 7. 6 7 9 * * 5..8 * * Hrs 6, 6 6 6 76 5 6.7.8.7 7.6 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e CITY OF BRAMPTON Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 68, 69 8 9 5 5 5 5..8..8 6. 86,5 7 6 6 67 9 579, 5 7 9 5.7..76 9,8 59 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 7,5 7. 6 6 7 8 5 9..8..9 Hrs,8, 9 67 5 7 6 8..8 9.8.8 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 6,.5 5 6 9 6 5 * 6 7..5 5.5 * Hrs 878, 8 7 5 5 67 5 6 7 7.. 7..8 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 8,6 5 7 9 7 8 5 6.9.5.8.6 5. 6, 7 7 67 5 5, 7 6 8...77 7, 59 7 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 5, 5.7 6 9 7..8 9..8 Hrs 97, 7 6 65 5 9 7 6.. 7.6.5 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM, 7. 6 9 6 * 5 6.8.7 5.8 * Hrs 7,6 5 56 9 66 5 7 8.9. 6.7.6 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,5 8 5 9 5 6 6 8 7.... 6.6,5 8 7 7 5 9, 7 6 9 7.9..76,5 8 5 65 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 5, 6. 9 68 7 7.6.7.6 5. Hrs 96, 8 6 7 5 5 8. 5.5 8.6.5 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5,9. 5 8 6 6 * 7.9.8 5.8 * Hrs 78, 5 5 5 7 7 5 7 6.. 7. 5. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 5 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 7,7 8 59 6 8 5 6 6.6..7..7, 5 6 7 6 5, 5 7 7 5 9.8..77, 9 9 6 7 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 9,9. 5 8 9 65 9 8..9 8. 9. Hrs 8,8 7 8 65 7 6..6 7. 9.5 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,9 9 6 7 6 7 5 * 5 6 9. 5. 5.5 * Hrs 7, 5 69 6 7 7..7 5.8 9.5 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 6 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 5,9 6 5 6 8 7 8 7 6.6.9..8 6. 9, 6 8 65 57,9 5 7 6 9.5.9.7 8,8 5 57 5 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 6, 7.6 5 59 9 7 8 7.8... Hrs 95, 8 7 6 6 9 6 5 6.9.. 9.9 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5,5.7 5 9 5 6 * 6 8.. 9. * Hrs 7,8 55 6 5 9 7 5 7.. 9. 9.8 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 7 WARD 5 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,8 85 8 9 8 7 8 7 5 6 5.6.9..9 6., 9 7 7 67 8 9,9 6 7 9 9 5...7 5,6 5 58 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 5 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,6 8.7 5 66 7 5 5 9.. 7.7. Hrs 85,8 8 5 7 5 6 9..8 8.. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 5 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,5.8 6 5 9 5 *..9.8 * Hrs 6, 8 8 6 67 7 7 5 7.. 5.5. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 8 WARD 6 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 8 7 6 7 8 8 5 6.8... 6. 8, 9 5 7 65 8 77, 8 8 6.8..77 8,8 8 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 6 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 7,7 9 6 5 5 8.6 5..8 5.9 Hrs, 5 69 5 6 9.8 5.8.7 6. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 6 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,8.9 9 9 6 * 8 6.7.6 5.7 * Hrs 95,5 7 6 9 67 5 5 8 8.8. 9. 6. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 9 WARD 7 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 9, 5 5 8 9 9 5 7 8.9.6.9.6 5. 7, 5 6 7 55, 5 7 7 5...77 8, 6 7 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 7 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 7, 6. 8 9 66 8 7 7...6 8. Hrs,7 7 7 69 8 5 5.8.9 7.6 8. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 7 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,6 6 8 65 5 * 7 6.8..5 * Hrs, 6 69 5 7 5 6..5 6. 7.9 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD 8 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,9 7 9 9 8 6 5.7...9 6. 7, 8 6 5 67 7 55, 5 7 5.6..78 8, 9 6 58 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 8 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 5, 6. 5 9 9 6 8 7 6..7.5 7.7 Hrs 95,5 67 5 8 5 8. 5.. 8. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 8 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5,5.8 66 5 7 * 5 9.7.6 5.9 * Hrs 5, 6 5 7 7 5 6 8..9 7. 8. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD 9 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 6, 77 7 6 7 7 7 5 9 6.9...9 6., 5 6 9 65 8 6,7 6 8.6.9.7, 6 58 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 9 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 9,6 8.9 6 8 6 6 5 9.6... Hrs,5 7 9 66 5 7 8 8.6...9 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD 9 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 9,.6 9 59 5 * 7 5 5.7. 6. * Hrs 8, 7 55 6 6 6 7 9 7..8 8.6. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 6,9 9 7 5 9 9 55 9 7...6. 7. 6,5 7 5 9 65 5 7,5 6 8 5 9.8.9.76 6, 8 56 7 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,7 8. 7 8 6 6 6 9 6..5 5.6.5 Hrs 8,8 8 66 6 7 6 9.7 6..6.5 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF BRAMPTON - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,5 9. 9 8 9 9 * 7.6..5 * Hrs 75,7 6 9 7 6 7 6 5 8.9...5 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,9 9 7 9 6 9 5 8 9.9.6..6 5.6,6 5 7 7 77, 6 6 8 9.9..75 6,6 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 5, 6 6 9 6 9 5 8 8..9 9.6 5. Hrs,6, 5 9 65 9 6 6.. 8. 5. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM, 7.8 59 7 6 8 7 6 7.7.7 7.7 9. Hrs,8, 7 6 8 69 7 6 7.6. 7.6.7 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 8, 9 7 6 6 9 8...8.6 5.,7 9 8 6 78, 5 6 7.9..77, 9 9 7 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,.5 5 68 6 8 7 8.9.7. 8.9 Hrs 9, 8 7 7 5 5 5 6.7. 7.5 8.9 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,6. 8 5 6 7 6 * 7 7 7.9 5. 5.9 * Hrs,6 8 7 7 8 7 5 5 5 6..5 6. 8.8 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 5 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 6,8 6 9 9 9 8.7.6.9.7 5.8, 9 5 7 6 6, 6 5...7,6 68 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,.7 7 6 6 9 9 9.5. 7.8 5. Hrs 97, 67 5 5 6 6.5 5. 6. 5. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,7 5.6 5 5 5 69 9 9 9.9 6. 5.5 7.9 Hrs 88,7 6 7 6 7 6 7. 5.5 6. 5. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 6 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 8 8 9 8 8 8.7..8. 5. 8,5 6 7 8 59,9 6 5 8 8...75, 9 59 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 6,9 8 9 59 6.8. 5.5 8. Hrs, 6 8 5.6.9.7 8. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5,8.9 7 7 6 5 7 6 8.. 7.8 6.9 Hrs, 8 7 7 8 6 5 9 8 5.9.7 9. 8. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 7 WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 6,9 5 6 8 6 5 6.6.5.8. 5.,8 6 8 7 6 7, 9 7 5 9...75 6, 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,6.9 8 9 5 8 58 7 6 6.8.8 9.5.9 Hrs,7 6 9 6 5 5 5.9. 7.6.7 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5, 9 59 9 7 9 * 6 9.9 5.9 7.5 * Hrs, 9 6 5 5 6..6 6.5.9 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 8 WARD 5 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,9 9 7 5 9 5 7..7..5 5.5 7, 6 9 5 69 76,5 6 8 6 7...7 9, 55 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 5 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM, 5.9 7 9 59 6.7.9 8.8. Hrs,9 9 6 6 8 5.8.6 6.8. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 5 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 5,8. 8 6 8 9 6. 7.8 9. 8. Hrs, 58 7 76 7.5 7.6 8.8.8 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e 9 WARD 6 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages,7 68 5 8 5 7 5..8..8 6.5 8, 7 6 7 77,5 7 7 9 9...7 9, 6 59 5 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 6 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 9, 6. 59 5 5 7 5 6.5. 8. 5. Hrs 8, 5 8 6 6 6 5..7 7. 5. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 6 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM,. 6 6 9 * 5..8.8 * Hrs 5, 6 56 6 6 6 8 7.9. 6. 5. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD 7 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 5 6 69 7 9 8 5 5 8 5.6..7..6 7, 6 7 6 77,6 5 5 8.8..75, 6 8 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 7 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 5,6 5.6 9 8 9 6 5 9 8.6. 7.7. Hrs 9, 6 9 6 7 6.9. 7.6. TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 7 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 6,. 5 9 5 66 7 * 7.8.6. * Hrs 7, 6 5 5 7 6 9 8 6..6 5.8. March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD 8 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 56 7 8 5 6 5.9.5..8 5.9,7 7 7 67,7 6 9 6...7 5, 9 67 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 8 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM,6.8 5 6 8 67 7 5 5 8..8 6.8 7.7 Hrs 5,5 7 7 6.6.8 6.5 7.8 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 8 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM, 5 8 69 5 7.6.8 7.. Hrs,9 6 9 7 9 6.5 5. 6.6 7.6 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD 9 Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 9 5 6 8 6 5 9.9.6..6 5.7 8, 6 7 7 7 58,7 7 5 5 9.8..77,5 5 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 9 Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM, 8. 8 9 6 7 5 9.7.9..6 Hrs, 6 7 67 7 8 7.7..9.6 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD 9 - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 7, 7.9 5 5 7 * 9.8..7 * Hrs, 6 7 7 5 7 6.5. 8..7 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages, 8 6 7 7 5 5 57.6... 7. 6, 6 6 5 69 7, 9 5 7 7 7 6...76 6,8 5 6 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM, 9.9 6 6 6 5 9 9.9.8.8.7 Hrs,6 6 6 7 66 6 8 8..8.8.7 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM 6,7 8.8 8 9 9 8 * 5.9..7 * Hrs 89, 8 7 7 6 5 6 6.9..5.8 March 8

- -5 6-5 6-5 Daily per Person (age +) Daily Work per + s /Day P a g e WARD Dwelling Type hold Size Number of Available hold Averages 6,6 7 9 7 9 9 8 9 5 5..9..9 6.7 8, 7 6 7 69 9 57, 9 5 6 8 8.9..75 8,9 6 6 9 TRIPS MADE BY RESIDENTS OF CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD Walk & hr HB-W HB-S HB-D N-HB Driver. Cycle 6-9 AM 9,5 6. 5 6 6 6 5 8 6.7.. 7.7 Hrs, 8 67 7 6 5 6.. 9.9 7.7 TRIPS MADE TO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA - WARD - BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA Walk & hr Work School Cycle 6-9 AM, 8.7 6 9 5 5 7 * 8.7..5 * Hrs 8, 7 6 7 5 5 5 6.9. 9. 7.8 March 8