Average Weekday Ridership for the Guadalupe- Lamar Light Rail Minimum Operable Segment by Andrew Mayer

Similar documents
Light Rail Proposal. June 15, 2016 Presentation to Mayor Steve Adler

Frequent Service Network Proposal

North Lamar/Guadalupe Connector Corridor

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Making Mobility Better, Together

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Green Line Long-Term Investments

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

January Final. Phase 2 Initial Screening Memorandum

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Draft Enhancement Project and Investment Corridor

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Riverside Connector Corridor

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Capital Metro Future Transit - Executive Summary of NewStarts Submittal Page 1 of 11. u»ux «"»«I. METRO igij TRANSIT ; J

MetroExpress Improvements

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

South Congress Connector Corridor

Needs and Community Characteristics

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION. Final Smart Growth Evaluation Report

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

David Leard, Edward Potthoff, Andrew de Garmo and Kevin Welch

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

TIER TWO SCREENING REPORT

Maryland Gets to Work

RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE REPORT

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

Highland Connector Corridor

D2 - CBD Second Alignment

Federal Way Link Extension

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Draft Results and Open House

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Heavy-Highway Emission Inventory Update 2018

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

DART Priorities Overview

Specific recommendations are made for downtown Austin, park-and-rides, and several different transit center locations.

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Key Transfer Stations - Technical Memo

Red Line/Healthline Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis Tier 2 Detailed Alternatives Screening Report

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

1.3 OVERVIEW OF THE CORRIDOR

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

Traffic Counts

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Transit Access Study

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

Transcription:

Average Weekday Ridership for the Guadalupe- Lamar Light Rail Minimum Operable Segment by Andrew Mayer 7/12/2016 DRAFT rev04b

Purpose This study develops average weekday ridership estimates for four light rail alignment scenarios in Austin, Texas. They include the Central Austin Community Development Corporation s proposal for a light rail starter line, or Minimum Operable Segment, that would serve Guadalupe Street and Lamar Boulevard from 4 th Street to Airport Boulevard. Summary A spreadsheet- based model developed by the Transportation Research Board's FTA- Sponsored Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) 1, was populated with station- specific block- resolution data from the 2010 Census and 2011 Longitudinal Employment- Household Demographics (LEHD). ESRI s ArcGIS 10.4 was the primary analysis tool for population data, and the Census Bureau s OnTheMap 2 tool was used for finding employment data. Station points were selected based on optimized jobs counts in each transit shed. The model calculated ridership based off the number of people and jobs in the station catchment areas, the daily parking rate in the Central Business District, and how much of the project was grade- separated. Using merged half- mile radius buffers produced an estimate for average weekday ridership for the 2016 Central Austin CDC Guadalupe- N Lamar Minimum Operable Segment. This process was repeated for the 2015 MobilityATX/Civic Analytics Proposal, the 2000 Guadalupe- N Lamar to McNeil FTA project, and Guadalupe- Riverside Alternative Minimum Operable Segment. Running the analysis on the 2000 Federal Transit Administration s (FTA) project provided an apples- to- apples comparison with the FTA's ridership estimate of 37,400 made back in 1999, as well as test the calibration and sensitivity of the model developed by the Transit Cooperative Research Program. Data used by this model meet the definition of current- year data, as the term applies in FTA studies, and represent not a future year estimation, but one that is more conservative and looks back at known historical jobs and population data. The model draws on static data and does not incorporate linked trip demand into its ridership model. The 2016 Central Austin CDC Guadalupe- N Lamar Minimum Operable Segment light rail alignment would expect to pick up passengers from buses currently providing transfers at the North Lamar Transit Center, the 32- mile commuter rail Red Line at Crestview Station, and bus transfers at Republic Square. Today, Republic Square is Capital Metro's most active bus hub. As of May 2016, the Red Line carries an average of 2,660 daily riders. It has been reported at or near crush load several times a week during peak hour travel, but is planned to double in capacity when improvements now underway are complete. The introduction of light rail along Guadalupe and North Lamar would increase demand for the Red Line for commuters to the university and state offices, free up seats on the Red Line for utilization in the core as suburban riders alight at Crestview Station, as well as attract new inbound transfers from East Austin. 1 Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 167: Making Effective Fixed- Guideway Transit Investments: Indicators of Success http://www.trb.org/main/blurbs/170972.aspx 2 U.S.Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies http://onthemap.ces.census.gov/

Alignments and Average Weekday Ridership Estimates 2016 Central Austin CDC Guadalupe- N Lamar Minimum Operable Segment Route: Guadalupe at 4th Street, North on Guadalupe/Lavaca to North Lamar to Airport Blvd. Length: 5.3 miles 10 Stations Northern Terminus: Crestview Station at North Lamar and Airport Blvd Southern Terminus: Republic Square at Guadalupe and 4th Streets 2010 Population: 44,631 Jobs, 2011, ½ mile: 184227 Average Weekday Ridership: 34,000 +/- 9,000 2000 Guadalupe- N Lamar to McNeil FTA project 3 Route: Congress at 4th Street, North to 11th, North on Guadalupe/Lavaca to North Lamar to Crestview, Crestview North to McNeil on current Red Line track Length: 14.6 miles 17 Stations Northern Terminus: McNeil Southern Terminus: Congress and 4th Streets 2010 Population: 61,340 Jobs, 2011, ½ mile: 205,729 Average Weekday Ridership: 45,000 +/- 9,000 3 Station points were determined as a part of a follow- on study by Capital Metro in 2001 titled The Rapid Transit Project but were not defined for the proposal in 2000.

2015 MobilityATX/Civic Analytics Proposal Route: William Cannon at South Pleasant Valley to Todd Ln to Burleson to South Pleasant Valley to East Riverside Drive to South 1st Street, to Guadalupe/Lavaca to North Lamar to north of Rundberg Lane. Length: 14.0 miles 26 Stations Northern Terminus: North of Lamar and Rundberg Southern Terminus: South Pleasant Valley and William Cannon 2010 Centroid Population: 103,700 Jobs, 2011, ½ mile: 214,034 Average Weekday Ridership: 60,000; +/- 8,000 Guadalupe- Riverside Alternative Minimum Operable Segment Route: Guadalupe Street and Riverside Drive from 24 th St to Grove Boulevard Length: 5.5 miles 12 Stations Northern Terminus: 24 th and Guadalupe St Southern Terminus: East Riverside Drive and Grove Blvd 2010 Population: 53,825 Jobs, 2011, ½ mile: 134,871 Average Weekday Ridership: 25,000 +/- 5,000

Station Points 2016 Central Austin CDC Guadalupe- N Lamar Minimum Operable Segment Station Name Latitude Longitude Republic Square/4 th St 30.267273-97.746887 Wooldridge Square/8 th St 30.270874-97.745605 Capitol/12 th St 30.274902-97.74408 Museum/17 th St 30.280701-97.742004 University of Texas/24 th St 30.28772-97.741577 North University/29 th St 30.294663-97.742482 Hyde Park/38 ½ St 30.303493-97.737643 Triangle- State/47 th St 30.314892-97.732362 Old Koenig Ln 30.327804-97.725192 Crestview 30.33728-97.719116 2000 Guadalupe- N Lamar to McNeil FTA project 4 Station Name Latitude Longitude Republic Square/4 th St 30.267273-97.746887 Wooldridge Square/8 th St 30.270874-97.745605 Capitol/12 th St 30.274902-97.74408 Museum/17 th St 30.280701-97.742004 University of Texas/24 th St 30.28772-97.741577 North University/29 th St 30.294663-97.742482 Hyde Park/38 ½ St 30.303493-97.737643 Triangle- State/47 th St 30.314892-97.732362 Old Koenig Ln 30.327804-97.725192 Crestview 30.33728-97.719116 Anderson Ln 30.352295-97.722595 Research Blvd 30.371887-97.723877 Braker Ln 30.390076-97.717224 Gracy Farms Ln 30.403687-97.710388 Parmer Ln 30.421082-97.705505 Howard Ln 30.438721-97.700012 McNeil Rd 30.453125-97.720703 4 Station points were determined as a part of a follow- on study by Capital Metro in 2001 titled The Rapid Transit Project but were not defined for the proposal in 2000.

2015 MobilityATX/Civic Analytics Proposal Station Name Latitude Longitude William Cannon Dr 30.180298-97.746826 Dove Springs Elementary 30.188721-97.745483 Teri Rd 30.195313-97.74469 St Elmo s Dr 30.206909-97.740417 Ben White Blvd E 30.214294-97.735779 Parker Ln 30.219299-97.732605 Oltorf E 30.227478-97.7276 S Pleasant Valley Dr 30.234131-97.722778 Burton Rd 30.240295-97.72699 Lakeshore Blvd 30.245117-97.730713 Travis Heights/Alameda Dr 30.250916-97.740479 Lakefront 30.258728-97.748413 Republic Square/4 th St 30.267273-97.746887 Wooldridge Square/8 th St 30.270874-97.745605 Capitol/12 th St 30.274902-97.74408 Museum/17 th St 30.280701-97.742004 University of Texas/24 th St 30.28772-97.741577 North University/29 th St 30.294663-97.742482 Hyde Park/38 ½ St 30.303493-97.737643 Triangle- State/47 th St 30.314892-97.732362 Old Koenig Ln 30.327804-97.725192 Crestview 30.33728-97.719116 North Lamar Transit Center 30.348328-97.712524 Fairfield Dr 30.354675-97.703979 Rundberg Ln 30.364929-97.695984

Guadalupe- Riverside Alternative Minimum Operable Segment Station Name Latitude Longitude Grove Blvd 30.226987-97.707818 Crossing Place 30.231963-97.717649 S Pleasant Valley Dr 30.234131-97.722778 Burton Rd 30.240295-97.72699 Lakeshore Blvd 30.245117-97.730713 Travis Heights/Alameda Dr 30.250916-97.740479 Lakefront 30.258728-97.748413 Republic Square/4 th St 30.267273-97.746887 Wooldridge Square/8 th St 30.270874-97.745605 Capitol/12 th St 30.274902-97.74408 Museum/17 th St 30.280701-97.742004 University of Texas/24 th St 30.28772-97.741577 Methodology Parking Rates For this analysis, http://www.bestparking.com/austin- parking/ provided data on daily parking rates in the Central Business District. The settings used were daily, on a weekday, arriving at 8:00 AM and departing at 5:00 PM. Rates vary downtown, but they averaged $20. OnTheMap 1) In OnTheMap, make a selection using points to represent each station on the line. Add a half- mile ring buffer around the points and click Confirm and Add Advanced Selection. 2) LEHD data are derived from Texas Workforce Commission and correspond to the location reported by an employer for an unemployment insurance premium paid. The University of Texas has reported the location of all of its jobs in a point that is more than a half- mile from Guadalupe Street. UT jobs are not reportable for any station on or near Guadalupe Street running a half mile buffer, so It is necessary to adjust for an issue with the LEHD data where the jobs point for the UT Campus. To accomplish this, in the advanced selection, draw a polygon around the University of Texas- Austin campus. The boundaries are Guadalupe Street to the west, Dean Keaton Street to the north, IH- 35 to the east, and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the south. Do not buffer the polygon. Hit Confirm Advanced Selection to continue. 3) On the Selection Area pop- up, click on Perform Analysis: Both Areas. 4) On Analysis Settings, select Work for the area, Area Profile for analysis type 2011 for the year, and All Jobs for the Job Type. Click Go once all have been selected. 5) In the results tab, the first item will be Total All Jobs and a count. Copy and paste that number into the ridership spreadsheet.

ArcGIS 1) In ArcCatalog, create a point layer file named Light Rail Stations. The fields for the layer should be Name in text for the station names, CAL in text for the Civic Analytics Line, GL_MOS in text for the Guadalupe Lamar Minimum Operable Segment, and so on for additional alignments. 2) Add a file of 2010 Census Blocks with demographic data for the Austin area. In this case, the file capcog- 2010- blocks- race 5 was used. The important attribute is population data; in this case the field was total_pop. The 2010 Census Block file was found on CAPCOG s GIS portal. 3) Add the Light Rail Stations layer to the map. If necessary, project the layer to match the projection of the 2010 Census Blocks. If neither has a coordinate system defined, project both of them to use NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Ft_US. 6 4) Open the Editing toolbar and start an editing session. When prompted to choose the layer to edit, select Light Rail Stations. If a window with warning pops up, click continue. 5) In the editing toolbar, go to the right and click Create Features. This will bring up a tab on the right with the Light Rail Stations file included. 6) Click on Light Rail Stations, then select the Point button on the editing toolbar. This will allow you to create station points in ArcMap. 7) Place the points on the map. The station points should be in the same location as the points used in OnTheMap. 8) In the Table of Contents, open the attribute table for Light Rail Stations. Fill in the Station Name field and any fields indicating what alignment the station is part of. 9) Save the edits and close out the editing session. 10) Open the Geoprocessing Tab and select Buffer. Input features should be Light Rail Stations. Name an output feature. In the distance, input 2640 as the linear unit and make sure feet is the unit of measurement. In the Dissolve Field, select ALL. Click OK at the bottom of the menu. 11) There should be a half- mile buffer around the station points that appears as one polygon. 12) Under the Selection Tab, choose Select By Location. Make sure Select Features From is the selection method, the 2010 Census Blocks file is the target layer, and the source layer is the buffer of the station points. Have their centroid in the source layer feature is the spatial selection method. The size of the census blocks makes centroid selection a simple yet relatively precise method for dealing with polygons on the edge of the buffer. 13) There should now be a large number of census blocks that have been selected. In the table of contents, right click on the 2010 Census Blocks layer. Scroll down to Selection and choose Create Layer From Selected Features. 14) Rename and symbolize the 2010 Census Blocks selection, then open the attribute table. Right click on the total population field and choose Statistics. The Sum statistic will be used for the population estimate. 5 Capital Area Council of Governments http://data.capcog.org/information_clearinghouse/data/census2010/census- 2010- popblocks- race.zip 6 ArcGIS map spatial reference NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Ft_US

15) Sometimes, there will be census blocks that are within a half- mile of the station but are inaccessible due to barriers, like a river. To correct this, select the census blocks that are inaccessible. Open the attribute table, right click on the total population field and choose Statistics. Take the sum from this selection and subtract from the larger census blocks selection. 16) Copy and paste the revised sum of population into the Population field in the spreadsheet. Inputting into the Spreadsheet Input the population, employment numbers and the average daily parking rate in the CBD. For the Guadalupe- Lamar MOS, 100% of the project is at grade, but this number may vary for different alignments. If desired, the number of stations and total project cost can be inputted to determine what is the capital cost per rider.