Critical Solution Temperatures for Ten Different Non-CFC Refrigerants with Fourteen Different Lubricants

Similar documents
Twin-Screw Compressor Performance and Suitable Lubricants with HFC-134a

Determination of the Performance, Leak Scenario, Flammability and Oil Return Characteristics of a Novel R22 Replacement

R E. pua LOAN DOCUMENT DSR TINSTAMP. DTIC 70A DOaMIENT PROESSlING SHMMA B GHFU. DOCUMlENT IDENTIFICATIONH WDISTR3UON STATEMIENT DATE ACCESSIONED

Solubility, Miscibility, and Liquid Viscosity of Lubricants with CO 2 and Propane

Properties of Polyvinylether (PVE) as a Lubricant for Air Conditioning systems with HFC Refrigerants?Data Update?

Practical Stability Performance of Polyvinylether (PVE) With HFC Refrigerants

Transient Thermal Analysis of Screw Compressors, Part III: Transient Thermal Analysis of a Screw Compressor to Determine Rotor-to-Rotor Clearances

Reduction of Oil Discharge for Rolling Piston Compressor Using CO2 Refrigerant

Polybasic Esters: A Novel Class of Synthetic Lubricants Designed for Use in HFC Compressors

REFRIGERANTS AND LUBRICANTS

A Prototype Oil-Less Compressor for the International Space Station Refrigerated Centrifuge

Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Compression Loads in Twin Screw Compressor

The Design Aspects of Metal- Polymer Bushings in Compressor Applications

Storage, Bulk Transfer, and In-Plant Handling of Zeotropic Refrigerant Blends

Development of High Performance 3D Scroll Compressor

Experimental Investigation of Sound Pressure Levels Variation During Modulation of a Compressor in a Unit Case Study

Scroll Expander for Carbon Dioxide Cycle

Transmission Error in Screw Compressor Rotors

Effects of Refrigerant Injection on the Scroll Compressor

Diesel-Driven Compressor Torque Pulse Measurement in a Transport Refrigeration Unit

New Ester-Type Refrigeration Lubricants Primarily for Household Refrigerators

A Critical Assessment of Synthetic Lubricant Technologies for Alternative Refrigerants

Extending the Operation Range of Dry Screw Compressors by Cooling Their Rotors

A Two Stage-Double Acting Scroll Air Compressor

Twin-Screw Compressor Performance and Complex Ester Lubricants with HCFC-22

Twin Screw Compressor Performance and Its Relationship with Rotor Cutter Blade Shape and Manufacturing Cost

Oil Circulation Rate in Rotary Compressor: Its Measurement and Factors Affecting the Rate

Fully synthetic refrigeration oils based on special polyglycols (PAG) for R134a A/C systems. Advantages

Development of Scroll Compressor for 16HP VRF System

CFD Simulation of a Scroll Compressor Oil Pumping System

Availability Analysis For Optimizing A Vehicle A/C System

GEOlube RFL Range Product Data

A Low Friction Thrust Bearing for Reciprocating Compressors

Fundamentals of Lubrication and the Development of Lubricants Optimized for Low GWP Refrigerant-based Applications

Comparison Between Different Arrangements of Bypass Valves in Scroll Compressors

Investigation of Torque-Fluctuation Reducer Made of Permanent-Magnets for Screw Compressors

New Methods of Determining Viscosity and Pressure of Refrigerant/Lubricant

Elimination of Instability in Modulating Capacity Reciprocating Compressor

Research And Development Of Variable-Speed Scroll Compressor

Field And Laboratory Evaluations Of Lubricants For CO2 Refrigeration

AHRI Standard 1371 (SI) 2017 Standard for Performance Rating of Electronic Expansion Valves

The Effects of the Tribo-Conditions and Antiwear Additives on the Degradation of an Ester Oil and Analyses of Degradation Products

Structural Analysis Of Reciprocating Compressor Manifold

HCFC-22 Retrofits. There has been increased emphasis on retrofitting R-22

Transient Modeling of Vapor Compression Refrigeration Systems Using Measured Compressor COP

Comparing FEM Transfer Matrix Simulated Compressor Plenum Pressure Pulsations to Measured Pressure Pulsations and to CFD Results

Noise Reduction of Accumulators for R410A Rotary Compressors

Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation of the Friction Torque in Compressors with Straddle Bearings

Small Oil Free Piston Type Compressor For CO2

CFD Analysis of Oil Discharge Rate in Rotary Compressor

Noise Reduction in Bus A/C Systems with Screw Compressors Part II

Effect of Lubricant-Refrigerant Mixture Properties on Compressor Efficiencies

An Experimental Analysis on the Flow Rate in Scroll Compressors

Dynamic Modeling of a Poppet Valve for use in a Rotating Spool Compressor

Development of DC Inverter Scroll Compressor used for Marine Container Refrigeration Unit

Investigation Of Low GWP Refrigerant Interaction With Various Lubricant Candidates

A Study on the Starting Characteristics of a Reciprocating Compressor for a Household Refrigerator

Optimization of Suction Muffler Using Taguchi s DOE Method

Study of a Novel Compliant Suspension Mechanism in Low Side Type Scroll Compressor

Performance Analysis of a Sliding -Vane Rotary Compressor for a Household Refrigerator/Freezer

Optimum Rotor Geometrical Parameters in Refrigeration Helical Twin Screw Compressors

A Novel Automotive Two-Stage A/C Compressor

Mobile air conditioning lubricants

Lubrication Limits of Rolling Element Bearings in Refrigeration Compressors

Reducing the Fuel Consumption by Speed Control of the Air Conditioning Compressor

The Reduction of the Noise/Vibration Generated by the Discharge Valve System in Hermetic Compressor for Refrigerator

New Capacity Modulation Algorithm for Linear Compressor

Development of High Efficiency Swing Compressor for R32 Refrigerant

Development and Application of a Software Package for the Design of Twin Screw Compressors

Synthetic Gear Oil Selection Dennis Lauer

The Digital Simulation Of The Vibration Of Compressor And Pipe System

Verification of Flapper Suction-Va1ve Simulation Program

REFRIGERATION LUBRICANTS

Important Parameters for Small, Twin-Screw Refrigeration Compressors

The Influence of Discharge Ports on Rotor Contact in Screw Compressors

A New Device to Measure Instantaneous Swept Volume of Reciprocating Machines/Compressors

A Large Modern High Speed Reciprocating Compressor

Developments in Dry Running Seals for Reciprocating Compressors

Numerical Simulation and Performance Analysis of Rotary Vane Compressors for Automobile Air Conditioner

BFK Bi-flow Filter Drier

Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Liquid-Liquid Equilibria in Biodiesel + Glycerol + Methanol

High performance novel polyalkylene glycol lubricants for CO 2 based air conditioning/refrigeration systems

Influence of Cylinder Bore Volume on Pressure Pulsations in a Hermetic Reciprocating Compressor

Development of a New Type Cylinder Head for Piston Compressors

Development of Rotary Compressor for Highefficiency CO2 Heat-pump Hot-Water Supply System

Application of Manufacturing Simulation for Screw Compressor Rotors

A Motor Designer Looks at Positive Temperature Coefficient Resistors

Research of the Effectiveness of Use of New Mechanism in Reciprocating Compressors

Steel Suction Line Accumulators

Tribological Analysis of Metal Interface Reactions in Lubricant Oils/CFC12 and HFC 134a System

Impact of air conditioning system operation on increasing gases emissions from automobile

Three Phase Hermetic Protector Application Process

Developing a Compact Automotive Scroll Compressor

Performance Improvement of a Reciprocating Air Microcompressor

REFRIGERANT FLAMMABILITY TESTING IN LARGE VOLUME VESSELS

Experimental Study Of The Oil Injection Screw Air Compressor

Leaf Coppin. R.P.S. Bisht, Savita Kaul, P. Nagendramma, V.K. Bhatia, and A.K. Gupta Indian Institute of Petroleum, Dehradun, India

Eliminator Liquid line filter driers, type DCL and DML

Numerical and Experimental Research on Vibration Mechanism of Rotary Compressor

ADK Filter Drier. Alco Controls. Filter Drier. Features

Transcription:

Purdue University Purdue e-pubs International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference School of Mechanical Engineering 1994 Critical Solution Temperatures for Ten Different Non-CFC Refrigerants with Fourteen Different Lubricants S. C. Zoz Iowa State University M. B. Pate Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iracc Zoz, S. C. and Pate, M. B., "Critical Solution Temperatures for Ten Different Non-CFC Refrigerants with Fourteen Different Lubricants" (1994). International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Paper 285. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iracc/285 This document has been made available through Purdue e-pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact epubs@purdue.edu for additional information. Complete proceedings may be acquired in print and on CD-ROM directly from the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ Herrick/Events/orderlit.html

CRITICAL SOLUTION TEMPERATURES FOR TEN DIFFERENT NON-CFC REFRIGERANTS WITH FOURTEEN DIFFERENT LUBRICANTS Steven C. Zoz and Michael B. Pate Iowa State University ABSTRACT Miscibility data are needed to determine the suitability of refrigerant/lubricant combinations for use in refrigeration systems. A new method for obtaining refrigerant/lubricant miscibility data has been developed, and miscibility data have been obtained for a variety of non-cfc refrigerants and their potential lubricants. The refrigerants include R-22, R-32, R-123, R-124, R-125, R-134, R-134a, R-142b, R-143a, and R-152a. The lubricants consist of mineral oils, alkylbenzenes, poly glycols, and polyol esters with varying viscosities. The miscibility tests were performed in a test facility consisting of a series of miniature test cells submerged in a constant temperature bath. The bath temperature can be precisely controlled over a temperature range of -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to 194 F). The test cells are constructed to allow for complete visibility of refrigerant/lubricant mixtures under all test conditions. Critical solution temperatures obtained from the miscibility data are presented for each refrigerant/lubricant combination. Each of the refrigerants tested is miscible over the entire test temperature range with at least one of the lubricants, with the exception ofr-143a which exhibits immiscibility over the entire test temperature range with each of the lubricants. INTRODUCTION The development of acceptable alternative refrigerants requires the identification of compatible lubricants so that refrigeration systems will operate properly. The first requirement of a compatible lubricant is that it be miscible with the refrigerant over the operating temperatures of the system. Refrigeration systems require a miscible refrigerant/lubricant mixture for compressor lubrication, for maximum heat transfer performance in the evaporator, and for proper lubricant return to the compressor. Therefore, miscibility data for a wide variety of refrigerant/lubricant mixtures were taken in this study. To obtain miscibility data, one must visually observe and record the physical conditions of a refrigerant/lubricant mixture at a specific temperature. The procedure is repeated for desired ranges of temperatures and refrigerant concentrations. Visual inspection of the mixture allows for determination of whether the mixture showed signs of cloudiness, floc or precipitate formation, and the formation of a second liquid phase. Scope Miscibility tests were performed on refrigerant/lubricant mixtures for refrigerant concentrations of 10, 20, 35, 50, 65, 80, 90, and 95% by weight. These tests were performed by keeping the refrigerant/lubricant mixture visible at all times, by controlling temperatures to ±1 C (±l.8 F), and by providing agitation of the test cells. Each refrigerant/lubricant combination was tested for miscibility in l0 C (18 F) increments over the test temperature ranges. The test temperature range for R-22, R-32, R-123, R-125, R-134, and R-143a was -50 to +60 C (-58 to+ 140 F). The test temperature range for R-124, R-134a, R-142b and R-152a was -50 to +90 C (-58 to+ 194 F). Each of the above refrigerants was tested for miscibility with the lubricants listed in Table 1. REFRIGERANT/LUBRICANT TEST FACILITY The test facility includes test cells capable of withstanding the high pressures and the extreme temperatures encountered in the study of refrigerant/lubricant mixtures. The facility was designed for the purpose of determining the miscibility characteristics of refrigerant/lubricant mixtures over the temperature range of -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to 194 F) and for pressures up to 3.5 MPa (500 psia). The test cells have glass viewports and are submerged in one of two constant temperature baths so that the miscibility characteristics of the mixture can be observed and recorded. The test facility is described in detail in a previous publication (Zoz, 1994). The precise temperature of each bath fluid was measured by a platinum RID that is connected to a signal conditioner/current transmitter. The RID's have an accuracy of _±0.1 oc (±O.l8 F). Since the miscibility characteristics of 431

each cell were noted at l0 C (18 F) intervals in this study, the uncertainty in the actual temperature where a change in the miscibility characteristics occurred is ±5 C (±9 F). Due to the magnitude of this latter uncert~inty, the uncertainty in the temperature measurements is insignificant. Miscibility Characteristics When a refrigerant/lubricant mixture is miscible, it appears as one homogeneous transparent solution. However, when a refrigerant/lubricant mixture is immiscible, there is either cloudiness, evidence of particles dispersed throughout the mixture, or there are two liquid phases present in the cell. Throughout all testing, visual inspections were made for these signs of immiscibility. The presence of two liquid phases was the most common form of immiscibility encountered in this study, while cloudiness was the next most commonly observed immiscibility. Particles were seldom seen in this study. Refrigerant Concentration The refrigerant concentration of each test cell was calculated from the total masses of refrigerant and lubricant charged into the cell. The uncertainty in the concentration measurements depends upon the concentration that is being considered, but the maximum uncertainty in concentration is ±0.001 (0.1 %). The uncertainty was calculated by using a propagationof-error method discussed by Beckwith, Buck, and Marangoni (1982). It is important to note that the concentration in the test cell changed as the temperature of the cell was varied. This occurred because a vapor space was required above the liquid mixture so that the thermal expansion of the liquid mixture did not cause cell failure due to extremely high pressures internal to the cell. Due to the large uncertainty in the temperature at which a change in the miscibility characteristics occurred (i.e. ±5 C), small changes in the refrigerant concentration with temperature can be disregarded. Critical Solution Temperatures The critical solution temperature, as defined in the ASHRAE Refrigeration Handbook (1990), is the temperature above which a refrigerant/lubricant combination is miscible for all refrigerant concentrations. Since some of the new refrigerant/lubricant combinations have regions of immiscibility that occur with increasing temperature, an additional definition must be used. The lower critical solution temperatures presented herein are based on the ASHRAE definition, while the upper critical solution temperature is defined as the temperature below which a refrigerant/lubricant combination is miscible for all refrigerant concentrations. Some refrigerant/lubricant combinations were found to be immiscible over the entire test temperature range for certain concentrations. Other refrigerant/lubricant combinations never became immiscible (i.e. they were always miscible) regardless of the test temperature and concentration. For these cases, a critical solution temperature is not defined. Therefore, when presenting critical solution temperatures, these cases will be identified as immiscible (I) and miscible (M), respectively. REFRIGERANT AND LUBRICANT SOLUTION RESULTS This section presents results of miscibility measurements for each of four HCFC and six HFC refrigerants with fourteen lubricants. The data is presented in tables showing critical solution temperatures. A complete list of the raw experimental data is tabulated in a final report (Zoz and Pate, 1993). Each lubricant is commercially available and their trade names are also given in the final report. Additionally, properties of the fourteen lubricants are provided herein. Results of the measurements of four HCFCs (R-22, R-123, R-124, and R-142b) and six HFCs (R-32, R-125, R-134, R-134a, R-143a and R-152a) in each lubricant are presented below. For every refrigerant/lubricant combination investigated, the data set consists of the concentration, temperature, and visual characteristics of the contents of the cell. Temperature-concentration plots showing regions of immiscibility were constructed from these data, and critical solution temperatures were then identified from the plots. Table 2 provides a summary of the critical solution temperatures for each lubricant and HCFC refrigerant pair. Table 3 provides a summary of the critical solution temperatures for each lubricant and HFC refrigerant pair. Lubricant Characteristics Each lubricant is designated by its chemical type (base fluid) and viscosity. The viscosity presented is a nominal value as designated by ASTM standard D2422-86 (ASTM 1988). Table 1 provides densities and actual viscosities at various 432

temperatures along with the flash points and pour points for each of the fourteen lubricants. The moisture, iron, and copper content of each lubricant along with the acid number are provided in the final report (Zoz and Pate, 1993). As mentioned previously, the results presented below are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. R-22 Miscibility Data The ISO 32 naphthenic mineral oil, the ISO 68 naphthenic mineral oil, and the ISO 32 modified polyglycol, have lower critical solution temperatures of -10 C, l0 C, and -20 C, respectively. R-22 was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 60 C (-58 F to 140 F) with the alkylbenzene (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), mixed-acid (ISO 22}, mixed-acid (ISO 32), branched-acid (ISO 32), alkylbenzene (ISO 68), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58}, polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), mixed-acid (ISO 100), and pentaerythritol ester branched-acid (ISO 100) lubricants. R-123 Miscibility Data The naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 68) has a lower critical solution temperature of -40 C, and the pol)'propylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58) has an upper critical solution temperature of20 C. R-123 was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 60 C (-58 F to 140 F) with the naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 32), alkylbenzene (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), modified polyglycol (ISO 32), mixed-acid (ISO 22), mixed-acid {ISO 32), branched-acid (ISO 32), alkylbenzene (ISO 68}, polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), mixed-acid (ISO 100), and branched-acid (ISO 100) lubricants. R-124 Miscibility Data The lower critical solution temperatures for the naphthenic mineral oils (ISO 32 and 68) and the modified polyglycol (ISO 32) are 20 C, 50 C, and -l0 C, respectively. R-124 was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to 194 F) with the alkylbenzene (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), mixed-acid (ISO 22), mixed-acid (ISO 32), branched-acid (ISO 32), alkylbenzene (ISO 68), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), pentaerythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 100), and branched-acid (ISO 100) lubricants. R-142b Miscibility Data The lower critical solution temperatures for the naphthenic mineral oils (ISO 32 and 68) and the modified polyglycol (ISO 32) are -40 C, -40 C, and -30 C, respectively. R-142b was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to 194 F) with the alkylbenzene (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), mixed-acid (ISO 22), mixed-acid (ISO 32), branched-acid (ISO 32), alkylbenzene (ISO 68), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), mixed-acid (ISO 100), and branched-acid (ISO 100) lubricants. R-32 Miscibility Data The modified polyglycol (ISO 32) has a lower critical solution temperature of 10 C and an upper critical solution temperature of60 C. The mixed acid (ISO 22) has a lower critical solution temperature of0 C and an upper critical solution temperature of 50 C. The mixed acid (ISO 32) and the pemaerythritol ester branched acid (ISO 32) each have a lower critical solution temperature of -20 C. R-32 was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range- 50 C to 60 C ( -58 F to 140 F) with the polypropylene glycol d.iol (ISO 32) lubricant. R-125 Miscibility Data The modified polyglycol (ISO 32) has a lower critical solution temperature of0 C and an upper critical solution temperature of 30 C. The polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), the polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58), the polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), the mixed acid (ISO 100), and the branch acid (ISO 100) have upper critical solution temperatures of 50 C, 40 C, 40 C, 60 C, and 50 C, respectively. R-125 was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 60 C with the polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), mixed-acid (ISO 22), mixed-acid (ISO 32), and branchedacid (ISO 32) lubricants. 433

Table 1 Test Lubricant Properties Lubricant mixed-acid (ISO 22) polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32) mixed-acid (ISO 32) polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32) naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 32) alkylbenzene (ISO 32) modified polyglycol (ISO 32) branched-acid (ISO 32) naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 68) alkylbenzene (ISO 68) polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58) polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100) mixed-acid (ISO 100) branched-acid (ISO 100) Viscosity Density Pour est g!ml Point Flash Point 19.9@40 C 0.9983@ 4.3@100 C l5 C -52 C 195 C 29.7@40 C 1.007@ 4.49cmtoooc 25 C -45 C 166 C 32.0@40 C 0.98@ 5.7@,100 C 20 C -54 C 245 C Not Not Not Not Available Available Available Available 33.0@37.8 C 0.910@ 4.45(Q}98.9 C 20 C -40 C 168 C 28.0@40 C 0.872@ 6.0@100 C 15.6 C -42.8 C 155 C 32.0@40 C Not Not -60 C 4.1@100 C Available Available 30.0@40 C 0.995@ 5.3@100 C 15.6 C -48 C 234 C 62.5@37.8 C 0.916@ 6.04@98.9 C 20 C -34.4 C 179 C 57.0@40 C 0.871@ -40 C 155 C 5.8_@_100 C 15.6 C 58.0@40 C 0.993@ ll.o_@_l00 C l5 C 82.7@40 C L0007@ 13.2@.100 C 25 C 100@40 C 0.98@ Il.4@100 C 20 C 100@40 C 1.057@ 13_@100 C 15.6 C -40 C 255 C -40 C 175 C -30 C 255 C -40 C 258 C Table 2 Critical Solution Temperatures For Fourteen Lubricants With Four HCFC Refrigerants CRITICAL SOLUTION TEMPERATURES (I.,OWER/UPPER)_ Refrigerant R-22 R-123 R-124 R-142b Lubricant -50 C to 60 C -50 C to 60 C -sooc to 90 C -sooc to 90 C n~hthenic mineral oil (ISO 3 2) -l0 C/None M 20 C/None -40 C/None alkylbenzene (ISO 32) M M M M polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (IS032) M M M M polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32) M M M M modified polyglycol (ISO 32) -20 C/None M -l0 C/None -40 C/None mixed-acid (ISO 22) M M M M _pe_ntaerythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 32) M M M M pentaeryth_ritol ester branched-acid (ISO 32) M M M M naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 68) 10 C/None -40 C/None 50 C/None -30 C/None alkylbenzene (ISO 68) M M M M polti>!"opylene ~Jycol butyl monoether JIS058) M None/20 C M M polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100) M M M M mixed-acid (ISO 100) M M M M branched-acid (ISO 100) M M M M 434

Table 3 Critical Solution Temperatures For Fourteen Lubricants With Six HFC Refrigerants CRITICAL SOLUTION TEMPERATURES (LOWER/UPPER) Refrigerant R-32 R-125 R-134 R-134a R-143a R-152a Lubricant naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 32) alkylbenzene (ISO 32) polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (IS032) polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32) modified polyglycol (ISO 322 mixed-acid (ISO 22) mixed-acid (ISO 32) branched-acid (ISO 32) naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 68) alkylbenzene (ISO 68) polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (IS058) polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100) mixed-acid (ISO 100) branched-acid (ISO 100) -sooc to -sooc to -sooc to -sooc to -sooc to -sooc to 60 C 60 C 60 C 90 C 60 C 90 C I I I I I I I I I I I 50 C/None I None/50 C -20 C/None None/60 C I M M M M M I M l0 C/60 C 0 C/30 C 0 C/None 0 C/None I M 0 C/50 C M M -50 C/None I M -20 C/None M M M I M -20 C/None M M M I M I I I I I I I I I I I 50 C/None I None/40 C M None/50 C I None/80 C I None/40 C M None/60 C I None/70 C I None/60 C M '-10 C/None I M I None/50 C M None/60 C I None/90 C R-134 Miscibility Data The polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32) and the modified polyglycol (ISO 32) have a lower critical solution temperatures of -20 C and 0 C, respectively. R-134 was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 60 C (-58 F to 140 F) with the polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), mixed-acid (ISO 22), mixed-acid (ISO 32), branched-acid (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), mixed-acid (ISO 100), and pentaerythritol. ester branched-acid (ISO 100) lubricants. R-134a Miscibility Data The polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), branched acid (ISO 100) lubricants have upper critical solution temperatures of 60 C, 50 C, 60 C, and 60 C, respectively. The modified polyglycol (ISO 32}, mixed acid (ISO 22), and mixed acid (ISO 100) lubricants have lower critical solution temperatures of0 C, -50 C, andl0 C, respectively. R-l34a was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to l94 F) with the polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32}, mixed-acid (ISO 32), and branched-acid (ISO 32) lubricants. 435

R-143a Miscibility Data R-143a was found to be partially miscible over the temperature range -sooc to 60 C (-58 F to 140 F) with all ofthe lubricants. For each lubricant and R-143a pair, at least one concentration remained immiscible over the entire test temperature range. Therefore, in this case, critical solution temperatures are not presented. R-152a Miscibility Data The alkylbenzene lubricants (ISO 32 and 68) each have a lower critical solution temperature of 50 C. The polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100), and branched acid (ISO 100) lubricants have upper critical solution temperatures of80 C, 70 C, and 90 C, respectively. R-152a was found to be completely miscible over the temperature range -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to 194 F) with the polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32), polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32), modified polyglycol (ISO 32), mixedacid (ISO 22), mixed-acid (ISO 32), branched-acid (ISO 32), and pentaerythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 100) lubricants. CONCLUSIONS Critically needed miscibility data have been obtained for a variety of refrigerants and lubricants. The test facility incorporates test cells with sight windows that, when valves are screwed into opposing ports, sejve as pressure vessels. The cells were charged with variable amounts of refrigerant and lubricant to facilitate refrigerant compositions from 0 to 100%. Operating temperatures and pressure ranges for the facility are -50 C to 90 C (-58 F to 194 F}, and 0 to 3.5 MPa (0 to 500 psia), respectively. The facility has been successfully employed to obtain experimental results for R-22, R-32, R-123, R-124, R-125, R-134, R-l34a, R-142b, R- 143a, and R-152a. Each refrigerant was tested with each of fourteen lubricants. Data for the HCFC refrigerants (R-22, R-123, R-124, and R-142b) and the HFC refrigerants (R-32, R-125, R-134, R- 134a, R-143b, and R-152a) in each of the test lubricants have been collected for refrigerant concentrations of 10, 20, 35, 50, 65, 80, 90, and 95%. The results are summarized and presented as critical solution temperatures. Each of the refrigerants tested was found to be completely miscible over the entire test temperature range with at least one of the lubricants except R-143a. It is left to the system designer to determine the suitability of a particular refrigerant/lubricant mixture for use in a system. The presentation of critical solution temperatures provides the designer with limits on the applicability of a refrigerant/lubricant mixture for use in a system. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute, Inc., under a Materials Compatibility and Lubricant Research (MCLR) grant from the U.S. Department of Energy. REFERENCES ASHRAE. 1990. ASHRAE Handbook- 1990 Refrigeration, Chapter 8. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. ASTM. 1988. ASTM 02422-86, Standard classification of industrial fluid lubricants by viscosity system. Philadelphia: The American Society for Testing and Materials_ Beckwith, Thomas G., Nelson Lewis Buck, and Roy D. Marangoni. 1982. Mechanical Measurements. Chapter 9. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Zoz, S. C. 1994. "An experimental investigation of the miscibility characteristics of alternative refrigerant and lubricant mixtures." Ph.D. diss., Iowa State University. Zoz, S.C., and M. B. Pate. 1993. "Miscibility oflubricants with refrigerants." Final Report, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute, ARTI MCLR project number 650-50300, report number DOE/CE/23810-6. 436