TAP PHASE 3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Similar documents
TAP PHASE 3.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Traffic Analysis for Bon Air Bridge Mitigation Magnolia Storm Water Quality Project

NCTCOG CATEGORY 5 RECAP FY 2016

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Jihong Cao, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Arnab Gupta, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Jay Yenerich, PE, Valley Metro

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013

2016 Traffic Signal System Performance Metrics Update Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Engineering, Public Works John Richardson, Planning and Sustainability

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Citizens Committee for Facilities

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Traffic Engineering Study

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

US 69/75 Controlled Access Highway and Grade Separations Benefit-Cost Analysis Narrative

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

PUBLIC MEETING. Bear Creek Park Community Center. January 24, :30 pm to 7:30 pm

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Railroad Impact Study

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

ST. CROIX RIVER CROSSING PROJECT 2004 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SUPPLEMENT FOR THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE:

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

system performance I-820 East Loop FM 156 TxDOT is working to expand its busiest metropolitan corridors.

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) Intersection Concept, Case Studies, and Design Guide ITE Midwest Annual Meeting June 30, 2015 Branson, MO

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

1.3 OVERVIEW OF THE CORRIDOR

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Freight Performance Measures Using Truck GPS Data and the Application of National Performance Measure Research Data Set (NPMRDS)

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

Request for Design Exception (#1) S.M. Wright Phase IIB

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 129

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Letter of Transmittal

HISTORIC TRAFFIC COUNT DATA ( )

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

I. Introduction V. Sample Calculations VI. Conclusion... 30

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Workshop Agenda. Bransford Roundabout. Bedford Intersection/Roundabout. Section 3 Revisions (Left turn lanes) Roadway Section/Curb Type Discussion

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

S.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

Heavy-Highway Emission Inventory Update 2018

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Expansion Projects Description

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

4.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

2016 Congestion Report

Project Advisory Committee

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

City of Lafayette Agenda Downtown Congestion Reduction Plan Steering Committee

Transcription:

TAP PHASE 3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In 2002 the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) launched the Thoroughfare Assessment Program (TAP), the goal of which has been to reduce vehicular emissions and improve mobility through traffic signal retiming. The program s third phase TAP Phase 3.2 began in 2006 and a team of consultants led by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. was selected to complete approximately half of its intersections. This summary covers 297 traffic signals operated by three cities Carrollton, Dallas, and Fort Worth -- and the Fort Worth District of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Figure 1 illustrates the locations of these traffic signals. This project has achieved seamless progression along 100 miles of arterial streets without regard to jurisdictional boundaries. Project Scope The assigned intersections were grouped into designated corridors that ranged in size from four to 35 intersections. For each corridor, the scope included the following tasks: A baseline assessment to document the conditions as of the beginning of the project. Development, implementation, and fine-tuning of the new signal timing plans. An after assessment to quantify and document the project results. The major focus of the program has been traffic signal retiming. However, a limited pool of funds was available to procure GPS clocks for intersections that did not otherwise have a reliable time base. These clocks, which are automatically reset by satellite, were installed at approximately 90 intersections in Fort Worth. Data Collection The project included extensive data collection: For all 297 intersections, peak-hour turning movement counts were made by human observers who used electronic count boards to record the number of vehicles by approach direction and by movement (i.e., left turn, straight through, or right turn). Approximately 82 bi-directional machine counts were made with pneumatic tube-type counters that digitally record the number of vehicles in 15-minute increments, totaled on an hourly basis. These included 22 seven-day counts, 42 24-hour counts, and 18 vehicle classification counts. As one means of measuring the benefits of the project, approximately 3,400 miles of travel time runs were made with an instrumented vehicle. The software electronically recorded the vehicle s speed, the distance traveled, and the number and elapsed time of each stop. Signal Timing Plans For the Corridor 686 (E. Lancaster Ave.) in Fort Worth, new timing plans were developed only for the weekday AM and PM peaks. For all other corridors, new timing plans were developed for those peaks plus the weekday midday peak. In many cases, separate versions of the AM and midday plans were Page 1 of 5

required for times when school speed zones are in operation. Some corridors required timing plans for other periods such as the Saturday afternoon peak or the late evening off-peak. After the new timing plans were operational, extensive fine-tuning was performed to improve actual on-street performance. Project Results Travel Time Runs The project results were measured quantitatively through the travel time runs made with an instrumented vehicle traveling at the pace set by other traffic. The before runs were made at the start of the project, prior to any changes in the previous signal timing. Later, after the new signal timing plans had been installed and fine-tuned, the after runs were made. Averaging all corridors (total of 88 miles of test routes), a comparison of the before and after travel time runs determined that the following reductions had been attained in travel time, stops, and delay: Average travel time savings: o 11.4 percent overall reduction in travel time. o 187 vehicle-minutes or 3.1 vehicle-hours reduction per weekday. Reduction in stops: o 40.3 percent overall reduction in number of stops. o Over 290 vehicle-stops reduced per weekday Synchro Measures of Effectiveness The project results were also estimated from the Synchro models that were used to develop the new traffic signal timing plans. For each corridor, the calibrated model of the before timing was compared with the calibrated model of the final timing. The measures of effectiveness (MOEs) that were compared included total signal delay and fuel consumption along with three categories of emissions (CO, NOx, and VOC). Averaging all corridors, the following improvement percentages were estimated by the Synchro TM comparison: Total signal delay was reduced by 13.7 percent Fuel consumption was reduced by 6.1 percent o Reduction of 2,542 gallons per weekday Emissions were reduced by 5.7 percent o CO reduction of over 178 kilograms per weekday o NOx reduction of over 35 kilograms per weekday o VOC reduction of over 41 kilograms per weekday Estimated Economic Benefits The following rationale was used to estimate the daily user savings from the new timing plans: On each weekday there will be: o Two hours of benefit from the AM peak timing plan o Two hours of benefit from the PM peak timing plan o Five hours of benefit from the midday timing plan o To be conservative, no benefit is assumed from other hours of the day even though most of the corridors operate the new timing plans for at least 12 hours per day. Page 2 of 5

For the purpose of economic analysis of transportation improvements, NCTCOG s current value is $12.50 per vehicle-hour of delay as reflected in Mobility 2030 2009 Amendment. For each corridor, the before and after Synchro TM models were compared for each of the three timing plans. Considering the composite total signal delay for all corridors and using the above-described rationale, the estimated user benefit is $82,675 per weekday. Assuming 248 weekdays per year, this equates to an annual savings of just over $20.5 million. The attached Table 1 provides a summary of the project benefits. The data provided include the following statistics per travel time route: route limits, number of signals, average daily traffic volume, and project benefits (reductions in travel time, stops, and delay). Also provided were the following statistics per corridor: number of signals, project benefits as derived from the Synchro models (reductions in total signal delay, stops, travel time, fuel consumed, and emissions), and daily user savings. Based on total signal delay as modeled in Synchro TM Version 6, the greatest per-intersection improvements were attained in Corridor 642 (Josey), Corridor 685 (Altamesa-McCart), Corridor 645 (Northwest West), and Corridor 643 (Industrial). These corridors all saw delay reductions of more than 50 vehicle-hours per day per intersection. These benefits were realized through improved phasing, adjusted cycle lengths, and improved coordination between intersections.. Page 3 of 5

Page 4 of 5

Table 1 Summary of Project Benefits Number of Signals From Travel Time Runs A Benefits From Synchro A D Daily User Savings B Corridor Travel Time Route(s) From To Along Travel Time Route Corridor Total 640 Luna Road Luna Road PGBT SB Off NB On Diplomat Dr 6 6 17,700 192 3 153 57 5,944 51 125 8.75 1.70 1.97 $713 $119 641 Hebron Hebron Pkwy Josey International 7 7 39,100 448 10 432 173 8,474 125 166 11.65 2.24 2.70 $2,163 $309 642 Josey Josey Jackson Tinity Mills WB (SH 190 WBFR) 4 4 34,000 136 3 133 354 1,238 366 262 18.10 3.50 4.21 $4,425 $1,106 643 Industrial Blvd Industrial Blvd Motor St Cadiz St 15 15 36,800 772 22 778 760 13,382 720 607 42.46 8.26 9.88 $9,500 $633 Abrams Rd Meadowknoll Walnut 7 29,600 397 8 373 Audelia Rd Walnut Forest Lane 5 25,200 47 1 39 644 Forest East Forest Lane Audelia Road Schroeder 11 26,900 316 12 287 633 27,702 377 981 68.70 13.38 15.93 $7,913 $226 Greenville Ave Forest Lane Walnut 6 21,200 382 9 350 Walnut St/Restland Rd TI Blvd Whispering Hills 6 15,300 407 8 391 Total Signals in Corridor 644 35 645 Northwest West Northwest Hwy Spangler Road Midway Road 17 17 23,700 259 9 278 884 19,215 951 823 57.68 11.22 13.39 $11,050 $650 Buckner Blvd Samuell Blvd US Hwy 175 EBFR 16 31,400 15 10 35 646 S Buckner Bruton Rd Jim Miller Rd Masters Dr 9 21,400 143 2 129 98 2,045 528 155 11 2 3 $1,225 $35 Lake June Rd Gillette St Masters Dr 10 20,200 241 2 145 Total Signals in Corridor 646 35 Greenville Ave Meadow Rd Park Ln 6 28,000 33 0 33 Meadow Rd Greenville Ave N Central Expy SBFR 5 8,400 127 2 114 647 Greenville Ave Park Lane Boedecker St Fair Oaks Ave 8 31,600 476 9 467 876 12,249 673 749 52 10 12 $10,950 $438 Walnut Hill Ln US 75 SBFR Greenville Ave 6 32,000 30 2 27 Total Signals in Corridor 647 25 648 Wheatland Rd Wheatland Rd Westmoreland Ave Polk St 10 10 22,000 288 5 295 147 5,827 210 152 10.45 2.06 2.45 $1,838 $184 Camp Wisdom Rd Bainbridge Ave Cockrell Hill Rd 6 18,300 577 13 586 649 Camp Wisdom Rd Cockrell Hill Rd Red Bird Lane Gannon Ln 6 24,800 41 2 50 19 2,554 16 33 2 0 1 $238 $20 Total Signals in Corridor 649 12 28,300 650 Westmoreland Rd Westmoreland Rd Canada Dr Gannon Ln 18 18 28,300 831 39.4 872 243 20,829 702 412 28.81 5.57 6.71 $3,038 $169 683 N 28th St N 28th St Azle Ave Riverside Dr 13 13 45,100 260 14.2 269 30 17,901 6 399 27.88 5.46 6.46 $375 $29 684 S Hulen St S Hulen St IH 30 WBFR Old Granbury Rd 23 23 40,800 686 25.7 1,161 870 41,145 876 1,019 71.51 13.89 16.58 $10,875 $473 Altamesa Blvd Westcreek Dr Welch Ave 5 26,800 555 0.6 141 685 Altamesa McCart McCart Ave IH 20 WBFR Cleburne Rd 7 29,400 644 14.1 611 1,051 16,683 1,042 883 61.67 12.03 14.30 $13,138 $1,095 Total Signals in Corridor 685 12 686 Lancaster/US 180 C E Lancaster Avenue Pine Street Handley Drive 13 13 27,100 453 8 318 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0 $0 687 Rosedale/SPUR 303 E Rosedale Street Riverside Drive Handley Drive 19 19 36,800 573 27 560 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0 $0 688 Hemphill Hemphill Street Pennsylvania Avenue Felix Street/Fuller Avenue 13 13 34,300 1,360 22 1,283 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0 $0 690 FM 1709 FM 1709 US 377 Commerce 20 20 27,600 567 14 576 419 11,703 401 456 31.83 6.19 7.35 $5,238 $262 GRAND TOTAL FOR TAP PHASE 3.2 297 297 832,100 11,255 290.8 10,604 6,614 197,693 7,032 6,912 482.96 93.74 112.26 $82,675 $278 Note A: Based on the following hours of benefit per weekday from the three timing plans: 2 hours per weekday for AM Peak plan; 5 hours per weekday for the Midday plan; and 2 hours per weekday for PM Peak plan Note B: Based on $12.50 per hour of Synchro total signal delay Note C: A Midday timing plan was not developed for Corridor 686 (Lancaster); therefore, its travel time run MOEs are based on AM and PM peaks only Note D: Excluding Corridors 686 (Lancaster), 687 (Rosedale), and 688 (Hemphill), which were done by the City of Fort Worth under a separate contract Average Daily Traffic Travel Time (seconds) Stops Delay (veh sec) Total Signal Delay (veh hours) Stops Total Travel Time (veh hours) Fuel Consumed (gallons) CO Emissions (kilograms) NOx Emissions (kilograms) VOC Emissions (kilograms) Corridor Total Per Intersection Page 5 of 5