CTR Employer Survey Report

Similar documents
CTR Employer Survey Report

CTR Employer Survey Report

CTR Employer Survey Report

2015/16 CTR Survey Data Overview


Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

Frequently Asked Questions Rideshare Program

Transportation Demand Management. Overview of Tools and Strategies

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

CSU Fullerton Commuter Choice Programs: Supporting Sustainable Commutes by Campus Employees

Emergency Ride Home Program Survey

Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon

FINAL REPORT FORM 1 (Formerly titled Project Monitoring Form 1 - Ridesharing ) Total Project Cost: $

Transportation Demand Management Program

Vanpool in Atlanta: Accommodating a 10% Mode Shift for Coca-Cola. Prepared for CEE 6625 by Calvin Clark Daejin Kim Yu Chen

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

Welcome! Think carpool, then think bigger! Questions? Contact our Vanpool team!

Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Data Collection at Mini-Mart with Gas Station

Transportation Demand Management Element

Attachment A. BATA Resolution No. 128 BAY AREA TOLL AUTHORITY TOLL SCHEDULE FOR TOLL BRIDGES (EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2019)

List of Figures. List of Tables Membership. Parking ations

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD E- BIKES: A REVIEW OF THREE STUDIES IN NORTH AMERICA

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

EXPERIENCE IN A COMPANY-WIDE LONG DISTANCE CARPOOL PROGRAM IN SOUTH KOREA

Kauai Resident Travel Survey: Summary of Results

TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORT 2017

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

2016 Reporting Guide W Sharp Avenue, Spokane, WA POOL (7665)

1.963 Report: A Sustainable Transportation Plan for MIT Campus May 2007

Trip and Parking Generation Data Collection at Grocery Store with Gas Station and Auto Repair

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Draft Transportation Demand Management Program for the Oak Knoll Project

CHAPTER 9. PARKING SUPPLY

Address Land Use Approximate GSF

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

MISSISSAUGA EXECUTIVE CENTRE

UC Santa Cruz TAPS 3-Year Fee & Fare Proposal, through

Comments_Negative_A. Neg_ScenA

Vanpool Incentive Program

Vanpool Regional Administration

School Transportation Assessment

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

Parking & Transportation Services Virtual Parking Permits at Stanford Stanford Staffers Brown Bag Forum Kingscote Gardens, Room 140 November 8, 2018

U N I V E R S I T Y O F B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A. Fall 2008 Transportation Status Report

Regional Vanpool Program Guidelines

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

Vanpool Program. *If you are rider in a vanpool that has a destination outside of Potomac Yard, you are also eligible for benefits through FAST.

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

List of Figures. List of Tables Membership Parking ations...

Parking & Transportation Services (P&TS) C a r d i n a l a t W o r k W e l c o m e C e n t e r

Best Route. Best Care. The Milwaukee Regional Medical Center s Alternative Transportation Program

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Commuter Behavior and Greenhouse Gas Emissions at the University of Rhode Island

The TDM Plan for Fort Washington Office Park NOVEMBER 1 6, 2017 FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE PARK STAKEHOLDERS

Parking Management Element

Rideshare and TDM Part of the Transportation System

Center for Energy Studies. Lauren Lee Stuart. Louisiana State University

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Thinking Outside the Bus: New Approaches to Commuter Transportation

Lauren Lee Stuart Center for Energy Studies Louisiana State University

CORPORATE ANNUAL REPORT 2014

THREE-PARTY VANPOOL INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT

Commuter Vanpool Program Scope of Work

3.0 MULTI-MODAL PROGRAM AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Travel to Work Survey 2018

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Energy and Communications

The Environmental Benefits and Opportunity of Shared Mobility

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

Mid-Atlantic GREEN OPERATOR GO Program: Replacement Funding Assistance Program Application

It s easy to understand why ridesharing is increasing in

Parking Pricing As a TDM Strategy

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

M E M O R A N D U M INTRODUCTION. POTENTIAL TDM STRATEGIES Marketing & Management. Residents & Employees. Exhibit 6

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Carpool Week 2012 Employer Toolkit

San Francisco Mobility, Access & Pricing Study

TULANE UNIVERSITY. Transportation Working Group: CAP Scenarios

Optimizing Community Benefits with Shared Mobility. Susan Shaheen, Ph.D

Shared Mobility in Seattle:

IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Berkeley Lab - Innovative Fleet Ideas, Goal Performance & Challenges

What s New in Shared. Mayor s Innovation Project Jan 24, 2015

CARBON EMISSIONS REDUCTION GOALS

Residential Curbside Recycling

Oregon Withholding Tax Tables

2016 Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Ports of Delaware and Virginia (DE-VA)* Dray Truck Replacement Program Application

2015 Transportation Technology Deployment Report:

CITY OF MOSCOW VANPOOL - RIDER AGREEMENT

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Transcription:

CTR Employer Report Employer Id : E12146 Employer : WA State Dept. of Enterprise Services Worksite : Street : 7511 New Market St 7511 New Market St Sw Thank you for completing your Commute Trip Reduction survey. This report contains the survey results. Response Rate : 92% Jurisdiction : City of Tumwater Date : 6/22/2017 Non-Drive Alone & One-Way VMT Rates at this Worksite Non-Drive Alone Rate : One-Way VMT per employee : 13.4% Drive Alone Rate : 86.6% 15.8 Average One-Way distance home to work : 17.3 Participation : CTR Status : Affected Type : Online Employees and Response Information Reported Total Employees at Worksite: 24 s Distributed : s Returned : s Returned by CTR Affected* Employees : Total Estimated CTR Affected Employees at Worksite : *CTR Affected employees filled out the survey as being full-time and commuting (typically) to work at least twice between 6a and 9a, Monday through Friday. 24 22 20 22 Non Drive Alone Rates - ALL Employees One Way VMT per Employee - ALL Employees Site History and Targets Cycle Non Drive Alone Rate - All Non Drive Alone Rate - CTR Affected Annual Metric Tons CO2e Emissions for ed Employees Estimated Emissions for Total Employment Pounds CO2e GHG per Employee's Roundtrip VMT per Employee - All VMT per Employee - CTR Affected 2007-2008 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2009-2010 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2011-2012 31.9% 31.9% 66 132 48.5 21.4 21.4 2013-2014 25.6% 25.6% 65 81 29.8 18.6 18.6 2015-2016 0.0% 0.0% 36 86 31.6 16.0 17.2 2017-2018 13.4% 14.7% 79 86 31.6 15.8 16.5 Target 37.9% Target: 17.5 % Point Change Target: % Point Change from Baseline: 6.0 % Change Target: -18.5 % Change from Baseline: -18.0% -26.2% GHG calculations are based on VMT and estimated total round-trip commutes for all employees. Modes that contribute to GHG include driving alone, carpooling, vanpooling, and riding a motorcycle. The use of other modes (e.g., transit, rail, walking, ferry) do not increase a worksite's GHG calculation. For more information about how GHG is calculated, please contact your jurisdiction's representative. Page 1 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Commute Trips By Mode - All Employees Q.4: Last week, what type of transportation did you use each day to commute TO your usual work location? (Mode used for the longest distance.) Mode Trips During This % of Trips During This % of Trips During Previous Employees Who Used This Mode at Least Once During This % of Employees Who Used This Mode at Least Once During This % of Employees Who Used This Mode at Least Once During Previous Drive Alone * 97 86.6% 100.0% 19 86.4% 109.1% Carpool * 10 8.9% 0.0% 2 9.1% 0.0% Vanpool 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Bus 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Rail 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Bike 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Walk 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Telework 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% CWW 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Boarded Ferry with Car/Van/Bus Used Ferry As Walk On 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Other 5 4.5% 0.0% 1 4.5% 0.0% * Motorcycle-1 is now included in Drive Alone and Motorcycle-2 is included in Carpool. Information about these trips is still available by request. Page 2 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Commute Trips By Mode - Affected Employees Q.4: Last week, what type of transportation did you use each day to commute TO your usual work location? (Mode used for the longest distance.) Mode Trips During This % of Trips During This % of Trips During Previous Employees Who Used This Mode at Least Once During This % of Employees Who Used This Mode at Least Once During This % of Employees Who Used This Mode at Least Once During Previous Drive Alone * 87 85.3% 100.0% 17 85.0% 110.0% Carpool * 10 9.8% 0.0% 2 10.0% 0.0% Vanpool 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Bus 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Rail 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Bike 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Walk 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Telework 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% CWW 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Boarded Ferry with Car/Van/Bus Used Ferry As Walk On 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Other 5 4.9% 0.0% 1 5.0% 0.0% * Motorcycle-1 is now included in Drive Alone and Motorcycle-2 is included in Carpool. Information about these trips is still available by request. Page 3 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Alternative Modes - Number of Employees Who Used a Non-Drive Alone Mode: Non-Drive Alone Number Of Days Exactly this # of Employees Exactly this % of Employees At least # of Employees At least % of employees 0 Day 19 86% 22 100% 1 Days 0 0% 3 14% 2 Days 0 0% 3 14% 3 Days 0 0% 3 14% 4 Days 0 0% 3 14% 5 Days 3 14% 3 14% 6 or More Days 0 0% 0 0% Count by Occupancy of Carpools and Vanpools Q.4 If you used a carpool or vanpool as part of your commute, how many people (age 16 or older) are usually in the vehicle? Ridesharing Occupancy Mode Response Count 2* Carpool 10 3 Carpool 0 4 Carpool 0 5 Carpool 0 >5 Carpool 0 <5 Vanpool 0 5 Vanpool 0 6 Vanpool 0 7 Vanpool 0 8 Vanpool 0 9 Vanpool 0 10 Vanpool 0 11 Vanpool 0 12 Vanpool 0 13 Vanpool 0 14 Vanpool 0 >14 Vanpool 0 * Motorcycle-2 counted with Carpool-2 for this table. Page 4 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Reported Work Schedule - All Employees Q.8 Which of the following best describes your work schedule? Reported Work Schedule Reported Work Schedule # Of Responses % Of Employees 5 days a week 19 90.5% 4 days a week (4/10s) 0 0% 3 days a week 0 0% 9 days in 2 weeks (9/80) 2 9.5% 7 days in 2 weeks 0 0% Other 0 0% Page 5 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Parking and Telework Q.9: On the most recent day that you drove alone to work, did you pay to park? (Mark "yes" if you paid that day, if you prepaid, if you are billed later, or if the cost of parking is deducted from your paycheck.) Q.10: How many days do you typically telework? Telework Frequency # of Responses % of Responses No Answer/Blank 1 4.5% I don't telework 19 86.4% Occasionally, on an as-needed basis 2 9.1% 1-2 days/month 0 0.0% 1 day/week 0 0.0% 2 days/week 0 0.0% 3 days/week 0 0.0% Page 6 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Reasons for driving alone to work/not driving alone to work Q11. When you do not drive alone to work, what are the three most important reasons? Question Text # of Responses % of Responses Other 8 29.6% Personal health or well-being 4 14.8% Financial incentives for carpooling, bicycling or walking. 3 11.1% To save money 3 11.1% Cost of parking or lack of parking 2 7.4% Driving myself is not an option 2 7.4% Emergency ride home is provided 2 7.4% Free or subsidized bus, train, vanpool pass or fare benefit 1 3.7% I have the option of teleworking 1 3.7% Environmental and community benefits 1 3.7% To save time using the HOV lane 0 0.0% I receive a financial incentive for giving up my parking space 0 0.0% Preferred/reserved carpool/vanpool parking is provided 0 0.0% Q12. When you drive alone to work, what are the three most important reasons? Question Text # of Responses % of Responses I like the convenience of having my car 16 33.3% Riding the bus or train is inconvenient or takes too long 12 25.0% My commute distance is too short 8 16.7% Family care or similar obligations 4 8.3% Bicycling or walking isn't safe 4 8.3% Other 3 6.3% I need more information on alternative modes 1 2.1% My job requires me to use my car for work 0 0.0% There isn't any secure or covered bicycle parking 0 0.0% Page 7 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017

Commute Mode By ZipCode for All Employees Q6. What is your home zip code? Weekly Count of Trips By Mode Other Ferry (walk-on) Ferry (Car/Van/Bus) CWW Telework Walk Bike Train Bus Motorcycle Vanpool Carpool Drive Alone Employee Percentage Total Employees Home Zip code 98512 5 22.73% 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98513 4 18.18% 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98502 3 13.64% 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98579 2 9.09% 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98092 1 4.55% 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98338 1 4.55% 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98444 1 4.55% 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98466 1 4.55% 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98501 1 4.55% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 98503 1 4.55% 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98516 1 4.55% 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98531 1 4.55% 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 8 of 8 Report generated on 11/3/2017