The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79

Similar documents
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System "

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad-hoc group on LKAS/RCP

Informal Document ACSF Automatically Commanded Steering Function

Economic and Social Council

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.2/Amend.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.2/Amend.3

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 (steering equipment) Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1

Revised proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (Motorcycle brake systems) I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Emergency Steering Function (ESF)

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79

Economic and Social Council

Amendments to R78. Annex 3, paragraph (c), amend to read (inserting a new footnote */):

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.3

Automated Driving UNECE International Harmonization

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Legal Aspects of Active Safety Systems. Tom Gasser, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) interactive Final Event

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9. I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Informal document No. 1

Steering Actuator for Autonomous Driving and Platooning *1

18th ICTCT Workshop, Helsinki, October Technical feasibility of safety related driving assistance systems

Economic and Social Council

DEVELOPMENT of REQUIREMENTS for AUTOMATCALLY COMMANDED STEERING FUNCTIONS

GRVA Priorities re: Automated Vehicles Bernie Frost

Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology

Special GRRF Session on

Economic and Social Council

POSITION PAPER Version 3.0

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.3/Amend.2

Review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation in Japan (Review of UN R41-04 Limit Value)

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No.79 (Steering equipment)

Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles

EU Work priorities for for UNECE activities. 1. Working Group on Automated and connected vehicles (GRVA)

SAFE DRIVING USING MOBILE PHONES

Procedure for assessing the performance of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in front-to-rear collisions

Development and Future Outlook of Steering Systems

[Kadam*et al., 5(8):August, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

STPA in Automotive Domain Advanced Tutorial

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

DANGEROUS GOODS PANEL (DGP) WORKING GROUP MEETING (DGP-WG/16)

RESOLUTION MEPC.278(70) (Adopted on 28 October 2016) AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNEX OF THE PROTOCOL OF 1997 TO AMEND THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE

Rear-end. kodaka 1 REAR-END COLLISION AVOIDANCE ASSIST SYSTEM

Seeking Even Greater Traffic Accident Reductions through Vehicle Advancements Promotion of ASV in Order to Realize Automated Driving

Advanced Vehicle Control System Development Div.

Economic and Social Council

Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission (EC) Informal Document No. GRRF (62nd GRRF, September 2007, agenda item 3(i))

A factsheet on Volvo Cars safety technology in the new Volvo S90

Energy ITS: What We Learned and What We should Learn

Economic and Social Council

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Update on the proposal for "A transparent and reliable hull and propeller performance standard"

Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision)

Industry input to ACSF-18 meeting, June 6-8, 2018 The Hague Homework from ACSF-17

Study of Pedestrian s fatal accidents (vs. motor vehicles at low speed) in Japan

A factsheet on the safety technology in Volvo s 90 Series cars

Energy Management for Regenerative Brakes on a DC Feeding System

ANNEX 3. RESOLUTION MEPC.278(70) (Adopted on 28 October 2016)

ANNEX. to the. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU).../...

Economic and Social Council

THE FUTURE OF SAFETY IS HERE

Near-Term Automation Issues: Use Cases and Standards Needs

Draft Proposal for category [C1] requirements

Featured Articles Utilization of AI in the Railway Sector Case Study of Energy Efficiency in Railway Operations

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. Application of more than one engine operational profile ("multi-map") under the NOx Technical Code 2008

Service. Adaptive cruise control in the Audi A8 Design and operation. Self Study Programme 289. For internal use only

B60W. Definition statement. Relationships with other classification places CPC - B60W

Interface between Rail Vehicle Weights and Underline Bridges

IWG TYREGTR 17 th Meeting* Brussels, ETRTO Office, 2-3 November 2017 Report of the Chair

A.B.C. Avoid Backing Collisions

Annex A. to Technical Specification "Operations and traffic management" adopted by

Human Body Behavior as Response on Autonomous Maneuvers, Based on ATD and Human Model*

AdaptIVe: Automated driving applications and technologies for intelligent vehicles

Japan s Comment to GRE-CM-1-11

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

JAPANESE COMMENTS ON US PROPOSAL OF INF.DOC.NO.6( 45 TH GRRF)

Euro NCAP Safety Assist

THE INFLUENCE OF VISIBILITY CONDITIONS IN HORIZONTAL ROAD CURVES ON THE EFFICIENCY OF NOISE PROTECTION BARRIERS

} Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.6/Amend.4

Proposals for amendments to Regulation No. 63

Toyota s トヨタの安全への取り組み

Új technológiák a közlekedésbiztonság jövőjéért

/CENELEC Phase 3/Generic Preliminary Hazard Analysis Template

TC26-B Vehicle Sensor

Economic and Social Council

5G as an enabler for the safety of vulnerable road users. Nigel Jefferies (Huawei, WWRF Chair) Klaus David (Kassel University)

The function of this Dynamic Active Probe has divided into three preferences on the screen main Menus:

Aria Etemad Volkswagen Group Research. Key Results. Aachen 28 June 2017

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/9

REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments. Proposal submitted by France

User Manual. 1. Introduction

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Economic and Social Council

Commencement of Preventative and Safety Performance Assessment

AEBS/LDWS General Safety Regulation. ACEA discussion paper. Paris, June Renzo Cicilloni. Director Safety

Transposition of GTR15 (WLTP) into EU Legislation and UN Regulations

(Amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2018/24)

H2020 (ART ) CARTRE SCOUT

Economic and Social Council

VOLKSWAGEN T-ROC OCTOBER ONWARDS NEW ZEALAND VARIANTS

DRAFT REPORT 2nd meeting of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for light vehicles

ACTIVE SAFETY 3.0. Prof. Kompaß, VP Fahrzeugsicherheit, 14. April 2016

Transcription:

September / 2012 Informal document GRRF-73-16 (73rd GRRF, 18-20 September 2012, Agenda item 8(c)) The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan

How the ADASS Is Defined in R79 In the Introduction section of R79, the ADASS (Advanced Driver Assistance Steering Systems) is defined as follows: Systems whereby the driver remains in primary control of the vehicle but may be helped by the steering system being influenced by signals initiated on-board the vehicle are defined as "Advanced Driver Assistance Steering Systems. Based on the above definition, the requirements on Automatically commanded steering function and Corrective steering function are given in paragraphs 2.3.4.1., 2.3.4.2., 5.1.3. and 5.1.6.1. Appendix in last page

Japanese approach for the Technical Guideline of New Technologies regarding R79 On the other hand, Japanese government has already placed a few Technical Guidelines about the follows devices, LKAS (Lane Keeping Assist System) Lane Keeping Assist System can reduce driver s workload during keeping a vehicle within a lane, and it can contributes to reduction of traffic accidents by lane departure and so on. PAS (Parking Assist System) Parking Assist System can reduce driver s workload during backward parking, and it can contributes to reduction of traffic accidents during parking. These new devices, which meet the Technical Guidelines, are expanding on the market.

Necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Since the devices for new technologies are going to expand on the market, we need technical standards for ensuring safety of these systems. The current R79 has no technical requirements for concrete devices like LKAS and PAS. Therefore, technical standards for LKAS and PAS should be established as new regulations. R79 should also be amended if necessary.

Proposal for New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 at the next session At the next session of GRRF (Mar. 2013), Japan is considering the proposing establishment of new regulations for LKAS and PAS. In this case, the control principles discussed at ITS Informal Meeting will also be taken into account. In other words, the regulation for ADASS should be established based on Design Principles for Control Systems to guarantee prevention of any accidents caused by the system and also prevention of confusion for users. (Currently being developed by ITS Informal Group)

Changes in PAS Shipment Volumes Number of units shipped globally by Japanese car manufacturers and other countries Shipment volume (in ten thousands of units/year) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

Changes in LKAS Shipment Volumes Number of units shipped in Japan by Japanese car manufacturers Shipment volume (units/year) 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year

The abstract of Lane Keeping Assistance System The system controls a steering with sensing lines on a road by a camera, and it assists a driver keeping a vehicle within a lane. It is expected that traffic accidents such as departure from a road side are reduced by the system because of reduction of driver s workload.

The abstract of Parking Assistance System The system controls a steering to assists a driver parking a vehicle into a backward parking space. Two types of parking are considered (Fig.1 and/or Fig.2). It is expected that traffic accidents during backward parking are reduced by the system because of reduction of driver s workload. Fig.1 Fig.2

The Major Contents of the Japanese Technical Guideline for Lane Keeping Assistance System Vehicle speed range for the system operation Functional limitation for the system Prevention of driving without holding a steering wheel System status of ON or OFF Driver s override Necessary information shown to a driver by display Methods for notifying necessary information to a driver Failsafe functions Methods and contents to make users know necessary items Test procedure Confirmation method regarding technical requirement

The Major Contents of the Japanese Technical Guideline for Parking Assistance System System status of ON or OFF by driver s intention Conditions for start of the system (target parking position) Assistance of a departure from the parking spot Vehicle speed limitation for the system operation Driver s override Prevention of harming a driver by rotation of steering wheel Necessary information shown to a driver by display Methods for notifying necessary information to a driver Failsafe functions Methods and contents to make users know necessary items Test procedure Confirmation method regarding technical requirement

Appendix (Definition of R79) "Advanced Driver Assistance Steering System means a system, additional to the main steering system, that provides assistance to the driver in steering the vehicle but in which the driver remains at all times in primary control of the vehicle. It comprises one or both of the following functions: (paragraph 2.3.4 of the current R79) "Automatically commanded steering function means the function within a complex electronic control system where actuation of the steering system can result from automatic evaluation of signals initiated on-board the vehicle, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, to generate continuous control action in order to assist the driver in following a particular path, in low speed manoeuvring or parking operations. (paragraph 2.3.4.1 of the current R79) "Corrective steering function means the discontinuous control function within a complex electronic control system whereby, for a limited duration, changes to the steering angle of one or more wheels may result from the automatic evaluation of signals initiated on-board the vehicle, in order to maintain the basic desired path of the vehicle or to influence the vehicle's dynamic behaviour. Systems that do not themselves positively actuate the steering system but that, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, simply warn the driver of a deviation from the ideal path of the vehicle, or of an unseen hazard, by means of a tactile warning transmitted through the steering control, are also considered to be corrective steering. (paragraph 2.3.4.2 of the current R79)

Appendix (Requirement of R79) 5.1.3. The direction of operation of the steering control shall correspond to the intended change of direction of the vehicle and there shall be a continuous relationship between the steering control deflection and the steering angle. These requirements do not apply to systems that incorporate an automatically commanded or corrective steering function, or to auxiliary steering equipment. These requirements may also not necessarily apply in the case of full power steering when the vehicle is stationary and when the system is not energised. 5.1.6. Advanced driver assistance steering systems shall only be approved in accordance with this Regulation where the function does not cause any deterioration in the performance of the basic steering system. In addition they shall be designed such that the driver may, at any time and by deliberate action, override the function." 5.1.6.1. Whenever the Automatically Commanded Steering function becomes operational, this shall be indicated to the driver and the control action shall be automatically disabled if the vehicle speed exceeds the set limit of 10 km/h by more than 20 per cent or the signals to be evaluated are no longer being received. Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning by a visual signal and either an acoustic signal or by imposing a tactile warning signal on the steering control.