Noise and Vibration Measurements for the DCTA Stadler DMU

Similar documents
Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail

Attachment E3 Vibration Technical Memorandum

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

Reduction of Vehicle Noise at Lower Speeds Due to Quieter Pavement. By Paul R Donavan

NOISE REDUCTION ON AGRICULTURAL TRACTOR BY SHEET METAL OPTIMIZATION TAFE LIMITED

Noise and Vibration Analysis Technical Report (Final)

Time (secs) Distance (feet) Accel (mphps) , , , , ,388 0.

Understanding FRA's Alternative Crashworthiness Compliance Approach. Marcin Taraszkiewicz, PE CH2M HILL, Principal Technologist Baltimore, MD

Appendix C Noise and Vibration Worksheets

COMPARISON of LIGHT-RAIL and BUS TRANSIT NOISE IMPACT ESTIMATES per FEDERAL and INDUSTRY CRITERIA

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

DART Capital Program Update

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The Denton County Transportation Authority Thomas M. LeBeau Vice President Rail Development

Definitions of Acoustical Terms

is being pushed by the locomotive, which reduces the number of seats in that car.

M Resort Spa Casino. Tom Chirdon. Faculty Advisor: William P. Bahnfleth Spring 2009

Pass-by noise, from the Real to the Simulated. The Analysis and Development for the ECE Certification MOTORCYCLES

DART Priorities Overview

Performance Based Track Geometry: Optimizing Transit System Maintenance

Design Calculation and Verification using SIMPACK Wheel/Rail

HEAVY-DUTY ARTICULATED 500,000-MILE BUS WITH A MINIMUM SERVICE LIFE OF 12 YEARS 7. NOISE 7.2 EXTERIOR NOISE TESTS. April 2006

Appendix D. Noise Calculations

Personal Rapid Transit as an Alternative to Bus Service in Two Communities

Qualification of Lockheed Martin Micro Pulse Tube Cryocooler to TRL6

Beyond the Specifications: Best Practices for OBSI Measurement

Utilizing Wayside Energy Storage Substations in Rail Transit Systems Overview and Simulation Results

Monitoring noise & vibration and asset management

VTA S BART SILICON VALLEY PHASE II EXTENSION PROJECT NOISE AND VIBRATION TECHNICAL REPORT P R E P A R E D F O R :

Regional Commuter and Intercity Passenger Rail in Arizona

MGA Research Corporation

Noise and Vibration Comparison Steel Lining versus Rubber Lining. Charles Hillmann

Cotton Belt Corridor. Area Focus Group (AFG) Richardson/Plano April 27, John Hoppie, Capital Planning

Denver Metro Association of Realtors

Board of Directors authorization is required for all goods and services contracts obligating TriMet to pay in excess of $500,000.

Project Location. I-80 Toll Plaza at I-480/I-80 Interchange, Lorain County, Ohio

1.1 Purpose of This Environmental Impact Report EIR Process Use of This Report Report Organization...

Minimizing Noise. Marybeth G. Nored Dr. Klaus Brun Eugene Buddy Broerman Augusto Garcia Hernandez Dennis Tweten. Southwest Research Institute

Hydrogen Fuel Cells as Motive Power for Industrial Switcher Locomotives

INTERIOR NOISE OF A KOREAN HIGH-SPEED TRAIN IN TUNNELS

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

December Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program. Report #3: Noise Contour Development Methodology Report

Engine Mount Force Prediction for Strength Design during Rapid Start

Adelaide Wind Power Project Turbine T05 (AD117) IEC Edition 3.0 Measurement Report

CASE STUDY OF TYRE NOISE: ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ROAD SURFACES

Energy Density Active Noise Control in an Earthmoving Machine Cab

PROPOSED HELICOPTER LANDING PAD 85 MILL ROAD LARA

APPENDIX H-4 AIRCRAFT NOISE EMISSION ESTIMATES

IMPACT2014 & SMASH Vibration propagation and damping tests V0A-V0C: Testing and simulation

NVH CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR MODERN AND ELECTRIFIED POWERTRAINS

Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation

Special edition paper

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Chevrolet Malibu

FEDERAL TRANSIT BUS TEST

Prediction of parking area noise in Australian conditions

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Railway noise mitigation factsheet 01: Overview of railway noise

New Flyer Industries Xcelsior, front and rear bumper installation certification.

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Using the MOVES Model to Do a Project Level PM Air Quality Analysis 2010 TRB Environment and Energy Research Conference Raleigh, North Carolina

Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise

Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Camry

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Noise from electric vehicles. Measurements

Community Meeting Station Elements

Waste Licence Reg. No W Noise Compliance Annual Report: South Dublin County Council s (SDCC) Ballymount Baling Station

Measurement of Noise within Passenger Trains on a Costal Railway Line

Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics

Northwest Rail Environmental Evaluation. Governments Team. September 13, 2007

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Explosive Energy Qualification and Equivalency Comparison in Impulsively Loaded Pressure Vessel

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Chapter 4 DC Machines

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Prius

Fig.1 Sky-hook damper

ASTM D4169 Truck Profile Update Rationale Revision Date: September 22, 2016

HEAVY-DUTY ARTICULATED 500,000-MILE BUS WITH A MINIMUM SERVICE LIFE OF 12 YEARS 7.1 INTERIOR NOISE TESTS

Development of a High Efficiency Induction Motor and the Estimation of Energy Conservation Effect

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

9/7/2010. Chapter , The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. MOTOR CLASSIFICATION. 2010, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Sound Application Guide: Description and Ratings

Table City of Glendora Predicted Vibration Levels for Residential (Category 2) Land Uses

DULLES AIRPORT ACCESS/TOLL ROAD CONNECTOR ROUTE 267, FROM ROUTE 123 TO I-66 NOISE ABATEMENT DESIGN STUDY. Noise Analysis Technical Report

Successful Strategies. for Managing the Complex ebart Extension

Research Report. FD807 Electric Vehicle Component Sizing vs. Vehicle Structural Weight Report

CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA

Three-Phase Induction Motor With Frequency Inverter

CHICAGO COMMITTEE ON HIGH RISE BUILDINGS

DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Y. K. Tso and R. G. Juniper

CAR ENGINE CATALYTIC COLLECTOR NOISE REDUCTION

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Scion xb

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

Chapter 4. Vehicle Testing

Memorandum October 5, 2017

Lower-Loss Technology

Report Addendum. Terry Keller, SDDOT. Noise Study Technical Report I-29 from Tea Interchange to Skunk Creek Sioux Falls, South Dakota

SECTION C TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION

Transcription:

Noise and Vibration Measurements for the DCTA Stadler DMU TRB ADC40 Transportation-Related Noise and Vibration 2013 Summer Meeting Santa Fe, NM July 31, 2013 David A. Towers, P.E. Principal Engineer Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.

INTRODUCTION A noise and vibration test program was conducted for the Stadler Model GTW 2/6 Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) diesel-electric articulated rail vehicle. The DMU vehicles operate on the Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) A-Train system. The test program was conducted in Lewisville, Texas during December of 2012. The objective was to document wayside noise and ground-borne vibration levels from the DMU for application to projects with plans to use similar vehicles (e.g. DART Cotton Belt and FWTA TEX Rail).

DCTA Stadler DMU Test Train Fully-equipped Stadler GTW 2/6 consisting of two 134-ft. long articulated vehicles weighing 161,500 lb. ea. (AW0)

Noise Measurement Methodology Measurement Microphones located at 50 ft. and 100 ft. from the test track center line Constant Speed Tests runs in each direction at constant speeds of 15, 30, 45 and 60 mph Acceleration Tests runs in each direction accelerating at full throttle from 0 to 30 mph Deceleration Tests runs decelerating from 30 to 0 mph, simulating a normal station stop Stationary Tests tests of stationary vehicles at low and high idle speeds

Noise and Vibration Test Location

A-Weighted Noise Measurement Results Measurement Condition Speed (mph) Sound Level at 50 feet 1 (dba) SEL at 50 feet (dba) 2-Car Train Single Vehicle Constant Speed Test 15 69 79 76 Constant Speed Test 30 75 82 79 Constant Speed Test 45 79 84 81 Constant Speed Test 60 81 86 83 Acceleration Test 0-30 80 87 84 Deceleration Test 30-0 76 84 81 Low Idle (Vehicle #111) 0 65 -- -- High Idle (Vehicle #111) 0 71 -- -- Background Noise Test -- 47 -- -- 1 Values for moving trains correspond to the maximum one-second Leq

DMU Noise Level Frequency Spectra (at 50 feet from the test track center line)

Noise Measurement Observations Constant speed tests indicate that one-third octave band noise levels typically increase with increasing speed above 63 Hz Spectra at lower speeds include peak at 50 Hz generated by the diesel engines Stationary low-idle condition includes peak at 40 Hz Peak shifts to 63 Hz for high-idle condition Potential for annoyance from noise-induced vibration if DMU vehicles idle in close proximity to residences

DMU Noise Prediction Model The FTA guidance manual has a method for predicting noise from DMU vehicles (although measurements are preferred). The FTA method is based on older DMU technology which may not be applicable to the newer Stadler vehicles used by DCTA. A primary objective of the DMU test program was to develop a model to predict noise from the Stadler vehicles for impact assessments on other projects. The noise prediction model is based on the Sound Exposure Level (SEL) for a single-vehicle pass-by.

Sound Exposure Level (SEL) vs. Speed (at 50 feet)

DMU Noise Prediction Model: SEL FTA Prediction Models: SEL for DMU is independent of speed SEL for rail cars varies in proportion to 20*Log(Speed) Stadler DMU: SEL < FTA DMU model below 60 mph SEL > FTA rail car model below 45 mph SEL (at 50 ft.) = 10.63*Log(mph) + 63.74 Adjustments made for added noise from operation at higher throttle settings and from regenerative braking

Vibration Test Procedures DMU Ground Vibration Measurements: Runs of the DMU test train were made in each direction at constant speeds of 15, 30, 45 and 60 mph. Vertical ground vibration was measured at 6 positions, with accelerometers at distances ranging between 15 and 125 feet from the test track center line. Ground Vibration Propagation Tests: Impact forces were generated at 11 points spaced 15 feet apart along a line parallel to and 15 feet from the track. Vibration response was measured at 5 positions on the ground ranging from 10 to 110 feet from the impact line. The relationship between the impact force and ground surface vibration determines the line source transfer mobility (LSTM).

Ground-Borne Vibration Test Locations

Average DMU Ground Vibration Level Spectra vs. Speed (at 50 feet from the track center line)

Line Source Transfer Mobilities (LSTM) at Test Site

DMU Vibration Prediction Model: Force Density Level FTA detailed vibration analysis prediction method is based on the Force Density Level (FDL) FDL spectra are calculated for specific DMU speeds FDL = Lv LSTM Lv = rms ground vibration velocity level LSTM = line source transfer mobility

DMU Force Density Levels vs. Speed

Comparison of DCTA Stadler DMU Force Density Levels with FTA Averages (at 45 mph)

Comparison of Force Density Levels for Different DMU Vehicles (at 45 mph)

Summary of DMU Force Density Level Comparisons DCTA Stadler DMU FDL values fall in between the FTA average values for commuter and light rail vehicles in the 10 Hz to 80 Hz frequency range DCTA Stadler DMU FDL values are similar to Colorado Railcar DMU values between 12.5 Hz and 125 Hz DCTA Stadler DMU FDL values are generally higher than those for the Bombardier Ottawa DMU

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) URS Corporation Timothy Johnson & Scott Edwards (HMMH)

Thank You! www.hmmh.com