Section 6. Ride Specification Special Provisions Step-by-Step Ride Guide for Inspectors and Project Engineers
|
|
- Abner Cross
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Section 6 Ride Specification 2399 Special Provisions Step-by-Step Ride Guide for Inspectors and Project Engineers
2 2
3 2399 PAVEMENT SURFACE SMOOTHNESS DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface. A Definitions The Department defines Smoothness as the Mean Roughness Index (MRI) value per 0.1 mi [0.16 km] segment. The Department defines Areas of Localized Roughness (ALR) as areas greater than or equal to the limiting criteria for a continuous MRI calculation with a 25 ft [7.62 m] interval, as calculated using the FHWA s Profile Viewing and Analysis (ProVAL) software MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS A Inertial Profiler (IP) Provide a Department certified, calibrated, and documented IP meeting the requirements of ASTM E 950, Class 1 and procedures maintained by the MnDOT Pavement Engineering Section. Refer to the procedures maintained by the MnDOT Pavement Engineering Section or to the MnDOT Smoothness website for the required settings for individual certified IPs. Provide an IP capable of producing a profilogram and exporting raw profile data in an unfiltered electronic Engineering Research Division (ERD) file format. Produce ERD filenames in the YYMMDD-T-N-D-L-B-E.ERD standardized format in accordance with Table : Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files Abbreviation Definition YY Two-digit year MM Month (include leading zeros) DD Day of month (include leading zeros) T Route type (I, MN, US, CSAH, etc.) Route number (no leading zeros) and auxiliary ID (if N applicable) D Primary route direction (I or D) Lane number (1 for driving lane, increasing by one for each L lane to the left; 0 for other lanes such as acceleration/deceleration lanes, ramps, loops) B Beginning station E End station B Profile Analysis Software Use ProVAL software to conduct a profile analysis to determine Smoothness and ALR. Report MRI values in units of in per mi to one digit right of the decimal [m per km to two digits right of the decimal] in accordance with conventional rounding procedures. C Operator Certification Provide an operator, trained in the operation of the particular IP in accordance with A, Inertial Profiler, and knowledgeable in the use of the required profile analysis software in accordance with B, Profile Analysis Software. Ensure profiler operators pass a proficiency test and possess a current certification issued by the Department. The Contractor may access a list of certified operators on the MnDOT Smoothness website. Provide documentation of operator certification to the Engineer. D Submittals
4 D.1 Before Profiling Provide the Engineer with current, valid documentation, issued by the Department, indicating both the IP and the operator certification. D.2 Day of Profiling Submit a printout containing the IP s settings, each segment s left and right wheel path International Roughness Index (IRI) values, and the signature of the operator to the Engineer on the same day of the profiling. Submit electronic files in ERD format representing the raw data from each pass on the same day of the profiling. If the Contractor fails to submit actual data to the Engineer on the day of profiling, the Department will require the Contractor to reprofile the measured segments. D.3 Upon Completion of Pavement Placement Within 5 calendar days of the placement of all mainline pavement and before beginning corrective work, submit a paper ProVAL summary report for each lane, indicating the results of the Smoothness Assurance analyses. Use the ERD filenames in accordance with A, Inertial Profiler to create ProVAL summary reports. If the summary reports indicate no ALR, submit a final spreadsheet summary in accordance with D.5, After Corrective Work. D.4 Before Corrective Work If the summary reports indicate any ALR, submit a written corrective work plan to the Engineer in accordance with E, Corrective Work. Include the beginning and ending points of locations planned for correction in the corrective work plan. Do not begin corrective work before the Engineer approves the plan. If the Engineer elects to assess a monetary deduction for ALR in accordance with Table instead of requiring corrective work, submit a final spreadsheet summary in accordance with D.5, After Corrective Work. D.5 After Corrective Work After reprofiling, submit a paper summary ProVAL report for each lane, indicating the results of updated Smoothness Assurance analyses to the Engineer. Submit the appropriate MnDOT Profile Summary worksheet available on the MnDOT Smoothness website. The worksheet should match the type of construction and the letting year of the project CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Using an IP, measure the final pavement surface for MRI unless otherwise excluded in Table Unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, perform all profiling in the presence of the Engineer. Schedule profiling with the Engineer. Reprofile any pavement profiled in the absence of the Engineer as directed by the Engineer at no additional cost to the Department. The Engineer will use a 10 ft [3.05 m] straightedge to evaluate areas excluded from surface testing with the IP in accordance with Table
5 A Pavement Surface Testing Remove objects and foreign material from the pavement surface before performing the pavement surface evaluation. Provide traffic control required for testing and performing corrective work on the final pavement surface. Run the IP in the direction of traffic. Measure profiles in the left and right wheel paths of each lane. Test and evaluate each lane separately. The Engineer will determine the length in miles of each mainline traffic lane. Operate the IP at the optimum speed as recommended by the manufacturer. Separate each lane into segments 0.1 mi in length. Evaluate the remainder segment less than 0.1 mi in each lane as an independent segment. The Engineer will prorate pay adjustments for length. Make each pass continuously, regardless of length, and end passes before exclusions in accordance with Table , Areas Excluded from Smoothness and ALR Evaluation. Begin each subsequent pass 50 ft before, and including, construction headers and end of day work joints. For percent improvement projects, measure Smoothness before the beginning of construction and after the completion of construction. Use the same stationing for the final profiling as the stationing used for the initial profiling to allow for a direct comparison of Smoothness when calculating the percent improvement. Measure the Smoothness Before Paving and the Smoothness After Paving values with the same IP. The Engineer will use a 10 ft straightedge to measure for surface deviations in accordance with 2301, Concrete Pavement, and 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement.
6 B Exclusions Table indicates areas that are excluded from Smoothness evaluation, but still require measurement with an IP, and are subject to evaluation for ALR and the 10 ft straightedge. Table indicates areas that are excluded from surface testing with the IP, but are subject to evaluation with the 10 ft straightedge. Table Areas Excluded from Smoothness Evaluation For All Pavements Paving in areas with a posted vehicle speed less than or equal to 45 mph Ramps and loops Acceleration and deceleration lanes less than or equal to 1,000 ft in length Projects less than 1,000 ft in length For Bituminous Pavements Single lift overlays placed directly on concrete For Concrete Pavements Intersections constructed under traffic begin and end exclusion 100 ft from the intersection radius Doweled shoulders greater than or equal to 10 ft in width Table Areas Excluded from Smoothness and ALR Evaluation For All Pavements Paving in areas with a posted vehicle speed less than or equal to 35 mph Paving in areas with a cautionary vehicle speed less than or equal to 35 mph Turn lanes, crossovers 10 ft on either side of obstructions in lane that obstruction is located Side streets, side connections 150 ft before stop signs at an intersection 150 ft before yield signs at a roundabout Bridge decks and approach panels 20 ft from bridge decks and approach panels 20 ft from terminal headers tying into existing pavement For Bituminous Pavements Paved shoulders Intersections where mainline profiles are merged or blended into the cross street profile begin and end exclusion 100 ft from the intersection radius For Concrete Pavements Doweled shoulders less than 10 ft in width Undoweled shoulders Headers adjacent to colored concrete C Calculations C.1 Smoothness Obtain Smoothness values in an individual lane using the ProVAL Smoothness Assurance analysis with the 250 mm filter. For percent improvement projects, use the Smoothness Before Paving and Smoothness After Paving values to calculate the percent ride improvement.
7 C.2 Areas of Localized Roughness Identify ALR using the ProVAL Smoothness Assurance analysis, calculating MRI with a continuous short interval of 25 ft [7.62 m] with the 250 mm filter. D Pay Adjustments D.1 Smoothness Evaluate Smoothness requirements using the equations and criteria in accordance with the following tables: (1)... Table for bituminous pavements, (2)... Table for concrete pavements, and (3)... Table for percent improvement projects. The Engineer will base pay adjustments on the segment Smoothness value (or percent improvement value, for percent improvement projects) measured at the completion of surface pavement, unless corrective work is required by the ProVAL summary report results. If a segment is less than 100 ft in length and Table , Table , or Table requires corrective work, the Engineer will waive the corrective work requirement for the segment and instead assess a prorated disincentive. The Department will still subject the segment to ALR analysis in accordance with Table For segments requiring corrective work, reprofile the entire 0.1 mi segment after performing corrective work as directed by the Engineer and enter the reprofiled Smoothness values into the final Profile Summary worksheet.
8 D.1.a Bituminous Pavements Table contains pay adjustments for bituminous pavements. See Section 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement of the Special Provisions for the ride equation requirements. Table Smoothness Pay Adjustments and Corrective Work for Bituminous Pavements Smoothness Pay Adjustment Equation in/mi $/0.1 mi < HMA-A Smoothness > 75.0 Corrective Work to 50.0 in/mi < HMA-B Smoothness > 80.0 Corrective Work to 55.0 in/mi < HMA-C x Smoothness > 95.0 Corrective Work to 65.0 in/mi For bituminous projects, the Engineer will not pay any positive Total Pay Adjustments if greater than 25 percent of all mainline density lots for the project fail to meet the minimum density requirements in accordance with 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement.
9 D.1.b Concrete Pavements For concrete pavements, the Engineer will use equation PCC-A. Table Smoothness Pay Adjustments and Corrective Work for Concrete Pavements Smoothness Pay Adjustment Equation in/mi $/0.1 mi < PCC-A Smoothness > 85.0 Corrective Work to 65.0 in/mi If the Contractor adds water to the pavement surface without approval by the Engineer, the Engineer will not pay any positive Pay Adjustments for 0.1 mile segments where the water was added and the Engineer may reject the pavement in accordance with 1512, Unacceptable and Unauthorized Work. D.1.c Percent Improvement Projects The Engineer will base pay adjustments on the segment percent improvement values. The Engineer will calculate the percent improvement in accordance with the following equation: Smoothness Before Paving Smoothness After Paving % I = 100 Smoothness Before Paving Determine the Smoothness Before Paving value before patching or other repair. Determine the Smoothness After Paving value after the completion of paving and any corrective work. Table Smoothness Pay Adjustments and Corrective Work for Percent Improvement Projects Equation Percent Improvement (%I) Pay Adjustment $/0.1 mi > PI 0.0 to (%I) < 0.0 Corrective Work to %I of at least 0.0 For bituminous percent improvement projects, the Engineer will not pay any positive Total Pay Adjustments if greater than 25 percent of all mainline density lots for the project fail to meet minimum density requirements in accordance with 2360, Plant Mixed Asphalt Pavement. Correct segments with a percentage improvement of less than 0.0 percent at no additional cost to the Department as required by the Engineer.
10 D.2 Areas of Localized Roughness The Engineer will evaluate ALR in accordance with Table , ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements. Table ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements 25 ft Continuous MRI Corrective Work or Monetary Equation in/mi Deduction, per linear 1.0 ft < Acceptable HMA-A or HMA-B, and a posted vehicle speed > 45 mph to < Corrective Work unless both the Engineer and the Contractor agree to a monetary deduct of $25.00 Corrective Work unless both the Engineer and the Contractor agree to a monetary deduct of $ < Acceptable PCC-A and a posted vehicle speed > 45 mph to < Corrective Work unless both the Engineer and the Contractor agree to a monetary deduct of $ Corrective Work HMA-C, PI, ramps, loops, concrete intersections constructed under traffic, or any paving with a posted vehicle speed 45 mph < Acceptable $25.00 The Engineer will consider areas of ALR acceptable if the reprofiled segment contains no ALR. The Department will reduce payment for ALR remaining after reprofiling as determined by the Engineer and in accordance with Table , ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements. D.3 Straightedge Evaluation The Engineer will allow variations less than or equal to ¼ in [6.35 mm] within the span of the straightedge in the longitudinal or transverse direction to remain in place without correction or penalty.
11 The Engineer will require corrective work on surface deviations greater than ¼ in [6.35 mm] within the span of the straightedge in any direction. For corrected variations, the Engineer will accept deviations less than or equal to ¼ in [6.35 mm] within the span of a 10 ft [3.05 m] straightedge in any direction. E Corrective Work Notify the Engineer at least 24 hr before beginning corrective work. Do not begin corrective work before the Engineer approves the methods and procedures in writing. Perform corrective work using a surface diamond grinding device consisting of multiple diamond blades, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. Fog-seal diamond ground bituminous surfaces as required by the Engineer and at no additional cost to the Department. Repair and replace joint sealant damaged by diamond grinding on concrete pavement as directed by the Engineer and at no additional cost to the Department. The Contractor may correct bituminous pavements by overlaying the area or replacing the area by milling and inlaying as approved by the Engineer. If milling and inlaying or overlaying, perform work in accordance with 2399, Pavement Surface Smoothness, over the entire length of the correction. If milling and inlaying or overlaying, use a transverse saw cut to begin and end the surface correction. Perform corrective work across the entire lane width. Maintain the pavement cross slope through corrective areas. Perform coring to determine if diamond grinding corrective work results in thin pavements, as directed by the Engineer. Provide additional coring for thickness verification at no additional cost to the Department. The Department may reduce the payment for thin pavement sections after diamond grinding. Handle residue and excess water resulting from diamond grinding in accordance with 1717, Air, Land, and Water Pollution. Perform surface corrections before placing permanent pavement markings. Replace permanent pavement marking damaged or destroyed by corrective work at no additional cost to the Department. Reprofile segments containing corrected areas with the same certified IP in accordance with A, Inertial Profiler within 5 calendar days after the completion of corrective work required by the Engineer. F Retesting Perform retesting as directed by the Engineer and within 30 days of the original profiling. If the retested Smoothness values differ from the original Smoothness values by greater than 10 percent, the Engineer will use the retested values as the basis for acceptance and pay adjustments. If the retested values differ from the original values by greater than 10 percent, the Department will not pay for the cost of retesting. If the retested Smoothness values differ by less than or equal to 10 percent of the original Smoothness values, the Engineer will use the original values. If the Engineer verifies the accuracy of the original results, the Department will pay for retesting as directed by the Engineer, except for retesting required after corrective work, at $ per lane mi [$62.14 per lane km] retested or $500.00, whichever provides the greater amount METHOD OF MEASUREMENT (BLANK) BASIS OF PAYMENT The Department will include the cost of the IP, testing, and traffic control in the relevant contract unit price for wearing course mixture for bituminous pavements, concrete pavement for concrete pavements, or for concrete grinding.
12 At Any Time If you have a smoothness related question or would like assistance with any of the steps enumerated in this document, please contact one of the following individuals. o Tom Nordstrom, Pavement Management Analyst: o Rob Golish, Assistant Concrete Engineer: o Greg Schneider, Assistant Bituminous Engineer: Before Any Profiling is Performed by Contractor Familiarize yourself with the following pavement terms: o International Roughness Index (IRI): roughness measurement that represents how the road feels to drivers and passengers o Mean Roughness Index (MRI): average of left and right wheel path IRI o Smoothness: 528-foot MRI o Area(s) of Localized Roughness (ALR): 25-foot continuous MRI in/mi o ERD file: text file that contains pavement elevation data o ProVAL (Profile Viewing and Analysis): FHWA software application used to view and analyze pavement profiles Ask inertial profiler (IP) operator to provide evidence of current, valid operator and inertial profiler certifications. Operator certification is valid for multiple years, but inertial profiler certification expires at the end of each calendar year. Both certifications can be verified by accessing the Profiler Certification page of MnDOT s Smoothness website: Version Page 1 of 18
13 On the Day Profiling is Performed by Contractor Receive a printout of each pass of data collected by the Contractor. While the data on this printout is not be used to calculate actual Pay Adjustments, it provides immediate, in-the-field approximations of a project s Smoothness and ALR values. You should focus on the following four portions of the printout: o Data collection software version, o Sensor serial number(s), o Low- and high-pass filters, and o 528-foot IRI & MRI values. It is critical that the software version and IP serial number(s) match those used during IP certification. Once certified, all IP settings are posted to the Profiler Certification page of MnDOT s Smoothness website, which can be accessed at: Confirm that the low- and high-pass filters are set to zero. If they are not, request a new printout. Low- and high-pass filters smooth out the profile, which can result in lower Smoothness values and higher Pay Adjustments. Finally, examine the left and right wheel path 528-foot IRI values, as well as the 528- foot MRI values, for an indication of the pavement s overall ride quality. The 528-foot MRI values listed on this printout should be nearly the same as the Smoothness values that will be entered into the Profile Summary worksheets by the Contractor at a later date. Figure 1 shows a sample printout from MnDOT s Ames high speed inertial profiler with the important portions of the printout highlighted. The left wheel path IRI, right wheel path IRI, and MRI tables are labeled Track 1, Track 2, and Average, respectively. Receive an ERD file for each pass of data collected by the Contractor. ERD files are imported into a software application called ProVAL to generate Smoothness and ALR values. Each ERD file must be named in the YYMMDD-T-N-D-L-B-E.ERD standardized format in accordance with Table Version Page 2 of 18
14 Table 1. Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files Abbreviation YY MM DD T N D L B E Definition Two-digit year Month (include leading zeros) Day of month (include leading zeros) Route type (I, MN, US, CSAH, etc.) Route number and auxiliary ID if applicable (E, W, etc.) Primary route direction (I or D, indicating Increasing or Decreasing; Increasing = North or East, Decreasing = South or West) Lane number (1 for driving lane, increasing by one for each lane to the left; use 0 for other lanes, such as accel/decel or ramps/loops) Beginning station End station For example, I-35W-I ERD would indicate a beginning station of 5+21 and an end station of , in the driving lane, in the increasing (northbound) direction of I-35W, tested on July 21, If the Contractor fails to submit the required data on the day of profiling, the measured segments must be reprofiled by the Contractor at a later date. Upon Completion of Pavement Placement by Contractor Within 5 calendar days of pavement placement, receive ProVAL summary reports containing Smoothness Assurance analyses. ProVAL summary reports contain the Smoothness and ALR data that will be entered into the Profile Summary worksheets by the Contractor (once any necessary Corrective Work is completed). See Figures 2 through 7 for a sample ProVAL report, paying particular attention to the highlighted portions Version Page 3 of 18
15 The data in the ProVAL report is presented in four distinct sections. The first section Analysis: Smoothness Assurance contains a short table that lists all of the pavement sections and indicates whether each was analyzed with a 250-mm filter. If any of the sections were analyzed without the application of this filter, ask the Contractor to generate and submit a corrected ProVAL report. Sections two and three of the ProVAL report titled Short Continuous and Long Continuous contain ALR data, while the fourth section Fixed Interval contains Smoothness data. Although it appears at the end of the report, examine the Fixed Interval section before the sections containing ALR. The first step is to confirm that the appropriate settings have been entered by the Contractor (see Figure 7). The Segment Length should always be 528 feet since the Profile Summary worksheets segment Pay Adjustments are calculated on a tenth-of-a-mile basis. The Threshold should equal the maximum Smoothness value before mandatory Corrective Work is triggered for a particular equation (Table 2 lists the Smoothness Corrective Work thresholds for each Smoothness equation). For instance, the Threshold for an HMA-A project is 75.0 in/mi. It is essential that both the Segment Length and Threshold settings are correct. If either of these is incorrect, request a new ProVAL report with the appropriate values. Table 2. Smoothness Corrective Work Thresholds Equation Smoothness Corrective Work Threshold (in/mi) HMA-A 75.0 HMA-B 80.0 HMA-C 95.0 PCC-A 85.0 After verifying the Fixed Interval settings, examine the Smoothness values presented in the Fixed Interval chart and table. The chart is useful for quickly surmising whether any of the 528-foot segments must undergo Corrective Work. The actual Smoothness values are listed in the table beneath the chart in the column labeled, No Grinding MRI (in/mi). The Smoothness values in this table should match very closely within a tenth of an in/mi per comparison to the 528-foot MRI values on the printout the Contractor submitted on the day of profiling Version Page 4 of 18
16 Let s suppose that the Smoothness data contained in the sample ProVAL report is for an HMA-A project. Examining the chart in Figure 7, it is obvious that two of the 528- foot segments the third and fourth exceed the Smoothness Corrective Work threshold of 75.0 in/mi. The bars that represent these segments are above the red, horizontal line, indicating that Corrective Work is necessary. Referring to the data table below the chart, you will find that the Smoothness values for these segments are and 81.35, respectively. At this point, it is recommended that you compare the ProVAL report s Smoothness values against the Pay Adjustment table(s) that will be used for the project. Tables 3 and 4 consist of the various Pay Adjustments and Corrective Work requirements used for bituminous and concrete projects. Table 3. Smoothness Pay Adjustments & Corrective Work Requirements for Bituminous Pavements Equation Smoothness (in/mi) Pay Adjustment ($/0.1 mi) HMA-A HMA-B HMA-C < ( Smoothness) > 75.0 Corrective Work to 50.0 in/mi < ( Smoothness) > 80.0 Corrective Work to 55.0 in/mi < (6.000 x Smoothness) > 95.0 Corrective Work to 65.0 in/mi Table 4. Smoothness Pay Adjustments & Corrective Work Requirements for Concrete Pavements Equation Smoothness (in/mi) Pay Adjustment ($/0.1 mi) PCC-A < ( Smoothness) > 85.0 Corrective Work to 65.0 in/mi 2016 Version Page 5 of 18
17 The next step is to inspect the Short Continuous section of the ProVAL report for ALR data. Begin by verifying that Segment Length and Threshold are 25 feet and in/mi, respectively. If the values match, examine the Short Continuous graph, which displays 25-foot continuous MRI values. This graph contains a red, horizontal line that intersects the y-axis at in/mi MRI. Any data points located at or above this line are defined as ALR. This graph is useful because it provides a visual representation of the amount and magnitude of the localized roughness (usually in the form of bumps and dips) that exist. The Short Continuous graph of our sample profile (see Figure 3) shows two adjacent ALR both having a maximum height of just over in/mi. Below the graph is a table titled No Grinding that contains the ALR starting and ending locations, along with the 25-foot continuous MRI value for the apex of each ALR. According to this table, the peak values for the ALR are and in/mi, respectively. After noting the locations and magnitudes of individual ALR, check the amount of pavement that falls within MnDOT s ALR Monetary Deduction categories. This information can be found in the short table located at the end of the Short Continuous section (see Figure 4). For our sample profile, the length of pavement to < in/mi is linear feet, while the amount in/mi is linear feet. Information on the various ALR categories and their corresponding Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements is located in Table 5. The final part of the ProVAL report the Long Continuous section is the least important. The data in the Long Continuous graph is the same as the data that comprises the Short Continuous graph, with one exception: the red, horizontal line on the Long Continuous graph intercepts the y-axis at the upper ALR threshold of in/mi instead at the lower ALR threshold of in/mi MRI (see Figure 5). While not critical, a quick scan of the Long Continuous graph can help the viewer determine how much ALR, if any, falls in the upper deduct category. The settings for this section should be 25 feet for Segment Length and in/mi for Threshold Version Page 6 of 18
18 Table 5. ALR Monetary Deductions and Corrective Work Requirements Equation 25-foot Continuous MRI (in/mi) Corrective Work or Monetary Deduction, per linear 1.0 foot < Acceptable HMA-A or HMA-B, and a posted vehicle speed > 45 mph to < Corrective Work unless both the Engineer and the Contractor agree to a deduct of $ Corrective Work unless both the Engineer and the Contractor agree to a deduct of $ < Acceptable PCC-A and a posted vehicle speed > 45 mph to < Corrective Work unless both the Engineer and the Contractor agree to a deduct of $ Corrective Work HMA-C, PI, ramps, loops, concrete intersections constructed under traffic, or any paving with a posted vehicle speed 45 mph < Acceptable $ Version Page 7 of 18
19 Determine whether Corrective Work is necessary. Two types of Corrective Work exist: Smoothness Corrective Work and ALR Corrective Work. Smoothness Corrective Work always is required when one or more Smoothness values exceed an equation s Smoothness Corrective Work threshold. In contrast, ALR Corrective Work can be substituted with a monetary deduction if both the Engineer and the Contractor agree (see Table 5). However, if either party desires Corrective Work, a monetary deduction will not be allowed in lieu of Corrective Work. Note: PCC-A projects with a Posted Vehicle Speed > 45 mph that have ALR in/mi must undergo Corrective Work until all ALR are eliminated. Figure 8 is a flowchart that was designed to simplify this oft confusing process. As you can see from the chart, Corrective Work never is required when both of the following are true: 1. Smoothness Corrective Work is NOT required by a Pay Adjustment table. 2. No ALR exists, or the Posted Vehicle Speed 45 mph, or the Smoothness Equation is either PI or HMA-C. Receive Profile Summary worksheets (if no Corrective Work is necessary). If Corrective Work is indeed unnecessary, ask the Contractor to use the data in the initial ProVAL report to fill out the Profile Summary worksheets (see Figure 9 for a sample worksheet). Upon completion, collect the worksheets from the Contractor. Review Profile Summary worksheets (if no Corrective Work is necessary). First, verify the data entered into the Profile Summary worksheets by comparing it to the data in the ProVAL summary report. Next, confirm that all of the worksheets green cells have data entered into them and that the correct lane description, Smoothness equation, and posted vehicle speed have been selected from the dropdown lists. Finally, it is critical that none of the white output cells indicates Corrective Work is necessary. The Profile Summary worksheets are programmed to not display a Total Pay Adjustment + Areas of Localized Roughness Deduction value if either Smoothness or ALR Corrective Work is required. This is to prevent disbursement of Pay Adjustments until after all necessary Corrective Work has been completed. Keep in mind that the Corrective Work indicated by a Profile Summary worksheet is not optional. If Corrective Work is indicated, it must be performed by the Contractor Version Page 8 of 18
20 Before Corrective Work is Performed by Contractor Receive a Corrective Work plan. You must approve this plan before the Contractor begins any Corrective Work. If no Smoothness Corrective Work is required and ALR Corrective Work is not mandatory, you may assess ALR Monetary Deductions in lieu of Corrective Work, provided the Contractor agrees to this substitution. If the Contractor does not agree to this substitution, ALR Corrective Work must be performed. Receive Profile Summary worksheets (only if Corrective Work is not mandatory and the Contractor agrees to ALR Monetary Deductions instead of Corrective Work). If it is agreed that ALR Monetary Deductions will be substituted for Corrective Work, ask the Contractor to use the data in the initial ProVAL report to fill out the Profile Summary worksheets. Upon completion, collect the worksheets from the Contractor. Review Profile Summary worksheets (only if Corrective Work is not mandatory and the Contractor agrees to ALR Monetary Deductions instead of Corrective Work). Refer to the section titled Upon Completion of Pavement Placement by Contractor for instructions on how to review Profile Summary worksheets. After Corrective Work is Performed by Contractor Receive new printouts and ERD files for Corrective Work segments. Following Corrective Work, the Contractor must reprofile all the 528-foot segments in which Corrective Work was performed. On the day of reprofiling, you will need to collect printouts and ERD files for these segments. Receive an updated ProVAL summary report that contains Smoothness Assurance analyses for each 528-foot segment in which Corrective Work was performed. Receive Profile Summary worksheets. Have the Contractor use the data in both the initial and updated ProVAL reports to fill out the Profile Summary worksheets. Upon completion, collect the worksheets from the Contractor. Review Profile Summary worksheets. Refer to the section titled Upon Completion of Pavement Placement by Contractor for instructions on how to review Profile Summary worksheets Version Page 9 of 18
21 Figure 1. Sample of Printout to Receive on Each Day of Profiling 2016 Version Page 10 of 18
22 Figure 2. Sample ProVAL Report (page 1 of 6) 2016 Version Page 11 of 18
23 Figure 3. Sample ProVAL Report (page 2 of 6) 2016 Version Page 12 of 18
24 Figure 4. Sample ProVAL Report (page 3 of 6) 2016 Version Page 13 of 18
25 Figure 5. Sample ProVAL Report (page 4 of 6) 2016 Version Page 14 of 18
26 Figure 6. Sample ProVAL Report (page 5 of 6) 2016 Version Page 15 of 18
27 Figure 7. Sample ProVAL Report (page 6 of 6) 2016 Version Page 16 of 18
28 Figure 8. Flowchart: What Needs to be Done after Receiving the Initial ProVAL Report? START Yes Is Smoothness CW required by Pay Adjust table? No Posted Vehicle Speed 45 mph? No Either Percent Improvement or HMA-C? No Any ALR? END Yes Yes No Yes Receive Profile Summary worksheets from Contractor. Receive a Corrective Work Plan from Contractor. ALR CW or ALR Deduct? Receive new ERDs and an updated ProVAL report from Contractor. CW unless both parties agree to a monetary deduct CW No Any ALR in/mi? Yes Receive a Corrective Work Plan from Contractor. Have Contractor perform CW and reprofile all segments that received CW. PCC HMA-A/B or PCC-A? 2016 Version Page 17 of 18
29 Figure 9. Sample Profile Summary Worksheet 25-Jan Concrete Profile Summary File Name(s) YYMMDD-T-N-D-L-B-E (1) YYMMDD-T-N-D-L-B-E (2) YYMMDD-T-N-D-L-B-E (3) S.P./S.A.P. Sample SP T.H./CSAH Lane Description Sample TH Mainline: lane 2 Date Measured Smoothness Equation Posted Vehicle Speed Additional Information 1-Mar-2016 PCC-A > 45 mph This is a sample worksheet. Stationing Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Areas of Localized Roughness (ALR) Beginning ALR < (linear ft) 27.0 End ALR (linear ft) 0.0 Beginning Station End Station Segment Length (ft) Final Smoothness (in/mi) Segment Pay Adjustment S $ S $ $ S $93.45 S $ $ $55.63 S $ S $ $ $ Total Pay Adjustment Areas of Localized Roughness Deduction Total Pay Adjustment + Areas of Localized Roughness Deduction $4, $ $3, Data Entered By Signature Data Checked By Signature 2016 Version Page 18 of 18
DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.
2399 PAVEMENT SURFACE SMOOTHNESS 2399.1 DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface. A Definitions The Department defines Smoothness as the Mean
More informationTable Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files
S-1 (2399) PAVEMENT SURFACE SMOOTHNESS (2013 version) DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. Always use with SP2005-111 (CONCRETE PAVING MIX SPECIFICATIONS PAVEMENT) and SP2005-140
More informationMnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications
MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications Spring 2013 NCC Meeting April 4, 2013 Philadelphia, PA Maria Masten, P.E. MnDOT Concrete Engineer Evolution of Smoothness No Equipment Certification 2002 Profiler
More informationMICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA) CFS:TEH 1 of 10 APPR:KPK:JFS:07-07-16 FHWA:APPR:07-15-16 a. Description. This
More informationITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces.
ITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES 585.1. Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces. 585.2. Equipment. A. Surface Test Type A. Provide a 10-ft. straightedge. B. Surface
More informationSECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS
SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS 610.1 Description. This work shall consist of measuring the smoothness of the final pavement surface. Smoothness shall be measured using the International Roughness Index
More informationDIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS
36-3.01 GENERAL DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS 36 GENERAL 04-20-18 Replace section 36-3 with: 36-3 PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS 36-3.01A Summary Section 36-3 includes specifications for measuring the smoothness
More informationMICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 03SP502(P) SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA) C&T:TEH 1 of 8 C&T:APPR:JFS:MJE:01-28-08 FHWA:APPR:02-01-08 a. Description. Provide
More informationPN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS
PN 420-7/18/2014 - SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS DESCRIPTION: The surface tolerance specification requirements are modified as follows for all mainline lanes and collector-distributor road
More informationPN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS
PN 420-10/21/2016 - SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS DESCRIPTION: The surface tolerance specification requirements are modified as follows for all pavements of constant width with at least
More informationCATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE
CATEGORY 500 PAVING 1 of 9 SECTION 535.01 DESCRIPTION. This work shall consist of measuring the roughness of the final surface of hot mix asphalt (HMA) or portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements. The
More informationSECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS
SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS 602.01 General 1. This specification establishes a standard for Portland cement concrete pavement smoothness, and defines defective pavement smoothness.
More informationNCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer
NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer RPUG 2011 NCDOT - Ride Quality Background Fall 1995 Rideability addressed in Asphalt
More informationManitoba Infrastructure and Transportation
Provincial Smoothness Specifications (MB, SK, AB, BC) Darel Mesher PhD, PEng November, 2012 Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation 2 1 Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation Construction Smoothness
More information(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP
S-xx (2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP2014-54.2 The Veda Software and Digital Test Rolling forms are available on the MnDOT Advanced
More informationAn Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT
An Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT Brian L. Schleppi ODOT Pavement Engineering Ohio Asphalt Paving Conference Tuesday February 7, 2004 Overview Review Major Points from 2 yrs ago Smoothness
More informationProject Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013
MnDOT Contract No. 998 Work Order No.47 213 Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/3/213 TASK #4:
More informationControl of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas
Report No. FHWA-KS-8-5 Final REPORT Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas William H. Parcells, Jr., P.E. Kansas Department of Transportation Topeka, Kansas May 29 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationProfiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road
Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Outline Introduction Objectives Profiler Certification
More informationRide Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues. Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation
Ride Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation Components of Pavement Smoothness Surface Tolerance deviations
More informationSimulating Trucks in CORSIM
Simulating Trucks in CORSIM Minnesota Department of Transportation September 13, 2004 Simulating Trucks in CORSIM. Table of Contents 1.0 Overview... 3 2.0 Acquiring Truck Count Information... 5 3.0 Data
More informationAsphalt Pavement Construction Update
Asphalt Pavement Construction Update 2013 FTBA Construction Conference Richard Hewitt, PE State Construction Pavement Engineer Smoothness Developmental Specification Smoothness Developmental Specification
More informationTHE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE
Wilke, P.W.; Hatalowich, P.A. 1 THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE Paul Wilke, P.E. Principal Engineer Corresponding Author Applied Research Associates Inc. 3605 Hartzdale Drive
More informationa road is neither cheap nor fast.
TECHNOLOGY Speaker phone By David Grimmer Contributing Author New app tells you degree of road roughness Getting roughness information for a road is neither cheap nor fast. Many cities and counties don
More informationAll Regional Engineers. Omer M. Osman, P.E. Special Provision for Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixture Design Composition and Volumetric Requirements July 25, 2014
All Regional Engineers Omer M. Osman, P.E. Special Provision for Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixture Design Composition and Volumetric Requirements July 25, 2014 This special provision was developed by the Bureau
More informationSMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1
THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Diamond Increased Pavement Performance and Customer Satisfaction Using Diamond How do I make limited budget dollars stretch and provide a highway system that offers a high level
More informationProfiler Certification Program at the NCAT Pavement Test Track. R. Buzz Powell Jason Nelson
Profiler Certification Program at the NCAT Pavement Test Track R. Buzz Powell Jason Nelson Background Certification startup costs via ALDOT project Satisfy requirements for Quality Assurance Leverage cooperative
More information2017 Local Roads Workshop Local Agency HMA Acceptance Specification
2017 Local Roads Workshop Local Agency HMA Acceptance March 2017 Review of Existing Spec Next Steps Construction Local Agency HMA Acceptance 1. Mix Design a. Submit Mix design and JMF to Engineer for
More informationDOCUMENTATION WORKBOOK FY 2017
DOCUMENTATION WORKBOOK SPECIFIC TASK TRAINING PROGRAM Conducted by the ILLINOIS CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION (ICT) AND IDOT BUREAU OF CONSTRUCTION FY 2017 WORKBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Workbook Page 1... Maximum
More informationRUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.
RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng. PRESENTATION OUTLINE A general overview of runway roughness Assessing roughness for new construction Assessing roughness of in service runways
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 808 DIGITAL SPEED LIMIT (DSL) SIGN ASSEMBLY.
808.01 Description 808.02 Materials 808.03 Design Speed 808.04 Construction 808.05 Method of Measurement 808.06 Basis of Payment STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 808
More informationThe INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application
The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application Shuo Li, Ph.D., P.E. Transportation Research Engineer Phone: 765.463.1521 Email: sli@indot.in.gov Office of Research
More informationPOLICY ON SPEED HUMPS
POLICY ON SPEED HUMPS PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the installation of speed humps along local residential streets within Miami-Dade County. POLICY: Speed humps will
More informationDYNAMIC PILE TESTING 10/26/ General.
te: The MoDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual indicates that the frequency of dynamic pile testing should be 1 to 10% of the number of piles. Additionally, the frequency of initial driving tests and restrike
More informationDEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION TESTS FOR BREATH ALCOHOL
DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION TESTS FOR BREATH ALCOHOL (By authority conferred on the department of state police by section 190 of 1945 PA 327, MCL 259.190, and section 625a of 1949
More informationIf it ain t broke, don t t fix it. HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA
$9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 Month-Year Ton Tonne 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA The Tennessee Program HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee Mark Woods TDOT 5,109 Interstate Lane
More informationField Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches
Field Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches by Dar-Hao Chen, Ph.D., P.E. and Feng Hong, Ph.D. Report DHT-48 Construction Division Texas Department of Transportation May
More information1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 14 - MISCELLANEOUS 1400 GENERAL... 14-3 1415 RUMBLE STRIPS (INCLUDING STRIPES) IN THE ROADWAY... 14-4 1415-1 General... 14-4 1415-2 Transverse Rumble Strips... 14-4 1415-2.1 General...
More informationThis is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"
This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)" Note to Permit Writer: This condition is for existing engines (commenced
More informationRE: S.P (T.H. 210) in Crow Wing County Located on T.H. 210 from Brainerd (R.P ) to Ironton (R.P )
District 3 Administration 7964 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 Memo To: Dan Anderson Transportation District Engineer From: Scott Zeidler Senior Engineering Specialist Date: December 11, 2017 RE:
More informationFIGURE 15. MANUAL RUT DEPTH
FIGURE 15. MANUAL RUT DEPTH Flexible Pavement Condition Survey Handbook, March 2012 Page 31 Ride Rating The longitudinal profile of each wheel path is measured at highway speeds by an ASTM E-950 Class
More informationI.D.O.T. Update Version -
I.D.O.T. Update - 2007 Version - RUBBLIZATION Rubblization with HMA Overlay Rehabilitation method for deteriorated concrete pavements Alternative to extensive patching or reconstruction Pavement in effect
More information3. Application Fees, Certificate Of Insurance & Performance Bond
SUBSECTION 13.10 CONSTRUCTION OF DRIVEWAYS 13.10A PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 1. General A driveway or access road serving private property and intersecting with a town road shall be constructed in such a manner
More informationPedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019
Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019 Contents DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY... ii SUMMARY... 1 TEST ENVIRONMENT... 2 Surface and Markings... 2 Surroundings... 2
More informationMoDOT TECHNICIAN QUALIFICATION MANUAL For PROFILOGRAPH OPERATORS. Table of Contents. Profilograph Example (Pay Calculation)
MoDOT TECHNICIAN QUALIFICATION MANUAL For PROFILOGRAPH OPERATORS Table of Contents Powerpoint Profilograph Example (Pay Calculation) Profilogram Analysis Exercise Profilograph Definitions Safety MoDOT
More informationPre-Installation. Surface Preparation TRAFFIC STRIPES, EPOXY RESIN
3-11-2013 Traffic Stripes TRAFFIC STRIPES, EPOXY RESIN Pre-Installation Striping Plan The contractor is required to submit the striping plan 20 days prior to beginning striping operations to the RE for
More informationPedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version 1) December 2018
Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version 1) December 2018 Contents DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY... ii SUMMARY... 1 TEST ENVIRONMENT... 1 Surface and Markings... 1 Surroundings... 2 Ambient
More informationLCB File No. R PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
LCB File No. R130-09 PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION EXPLANATION Matter in italics is new; matter in brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted. AUTHORITY: NRS 445B.210,
More informationE/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.102/Rev.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.102/Rev.1
30 August 2011 Agreement Concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for
More informationTRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy
A. GENERAL Speed humps are an effective and appropriate device for safely reducing vehicle speeds on certain types of streets when installed accordance with the provisions of this policy. In order for
More informationRound robin tests in the Netherlands
Round robin tests in the Netherlands organised by CROW Arco Blanken and Marius Nagelhout Arco Blanken (Rijkswaterstaat) Pavement engineer Monitoring of the main road network Developments: Implementation
More informationTo: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015
Memo To: From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON : 165620021 Date: Reference: E.C. Row Expressway, Dominion Boulevard Interchange, Dougall Avenue Interchange, and Howard 1. Review of Interchange Geometry
More informationD. Operation and Maintenance Data. In addition to items specified in Division 1 Section "Operation and Maintenance Data," include the following:
SECTION 16211 - ELECTRICITY METERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification
More informationMN Roads Low Volume Road Testing to Validate the Purdue TPTA Textures and Predicted Joint Effects
AMERICAN CONCRETE PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION MN Roads Low Volume Road Testing to Validate the Purdue TPTA Textures and Predicted Joint Effects Workplan Prepared by Larry Scofield American Concrete Pavement Association
More informationSPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS
SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPEED CUSHION INSTALLATION POLICY A. GENERAL Speed cushions are an effective
More informationSmoothness Specification Update
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Smoothness Specification Update 38 th Annual Asphalt Conference September 9, 2014 Intents Separate Rolling Straightedge from Laser Profiler Create Ride Quality (Smoothness)
More informationVoting Draft Standard
page 1 of 7 Voting Draft Standard EL-V1M4 Sections 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 March 2013 Description This proposed standard is a modification of EL-V1M4-2009-Rev1.1. The proposed changes are shown through tracking.
More informationAsphalt Technician Certification Program
Asphalt Technician Certification Program S - Smoothness (Operator) 2015 Presentation Manual In cooperation with the Colorado Asphalt Pavement Association, the Colorado Department of Transportation, and
More informationHeadlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)
Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I) February 2016 HEADLIGHT TEST AND RATING PROTOCOL (VERSION I) This document describes the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) headlight test and
More informationCraigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street
Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY Intersection Analyses 7 February 2014 Intersection Analyses Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street
More informationGeorgia Department of Revenue Policy Bulletin - MVD HB 170 Transportation Funding Act of 2015
Georgia Department of Revenue Policy Bulletin - MVD - 2015-01 HB 170 Transportation Funding Act of 2015 1) Purpose: Effective Date: July 1, 2015. 2) Authority: O.C.G.A. 40-2-11, 40-2-86.1, 40-2-151, 40-2-151.1,
More informationCROW WING COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO ROADS UNDER COUNTY JURISDICTION CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
CROW WING COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO ROADS UNDER COUNTY JURISDICTION Crow Wing County Highway Department 16589 CR 142 Brainerd, MN 56401 Crow Wing
More informationCam Motion Case Studies #1 and # 2
Cam Motion Case Studies #1 and # 2 Problem/Opprtunity: At an operating speed of 150 to 160 rpm, Cam Motion #1 causes the cam follower to leave the cam surface unless excessive air pressure is applied to
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 2/19/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationEffect of Ethanol Fuels upon OBD-II Systems Vehicle Test Phase
Effect of Ethanol Fuels upon OBD-II Systems Vehicle Test Phase Status as of Jeff Jetter, Honda R&D Americas, Inc. Background 2 The first phase of this project concluded that the MIL (Malfunction Indicator
More informationPavement Management Index Values Development of a National Standard. Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian
Pavement Management Index Values Development of a National Standard Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian Pavement Evaluation Conference October 25-27, 2010 Background NCHRP 20-74A Development of Service
More informationWest Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways
West Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways SMOOTHNESS ACCEPTANCE SPECIFICATIONS: MEASUREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION & PAY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAYS DRAFT FINAL REPORT
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 9/8/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROGRAM BASICS Mount Pleasant Transportation Department 100 Ann Edwards Lane Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465 Tel: 843-856-3080 www.tompsc.com The Town of Mount Pleasant has adopted a traffic
More informationRe: Online Reporting of Backflow Assembly Tests and Updates to Backflow Tester Records
Re: Online Reporting of Backflow Assembly Tests and Updates to Backflow Tester Records Dear Backflow Assembly Tester: Please note that there are significant changes to the City of Mercer Island's Testing
More informationTransportation & Traffic Engineering
Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family
More informationConcrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012
Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012 W. Charles Greer, Jr., P.E. AMEC Subash Reddy Kuchikulla MME James Drinkard, P.E. ATL
More informationSMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness
SMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness The traveling public cares about smooth roads. That was true in the early sixties, during the AASHO Road Tests, when drivers
More informationCITY OF FONTANA HANDBOOK ON RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
CITY OF FONTANA HANDBOOK ON RESIDENTIAL APPROACH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS GENERAL INFORMATION A driveway approach is an area, construction or improvement between the roadway of a public street and private
More informationA Crack is a Crack Mn/DOT s Perspective on Cracking in Asphalt Pavements
A Crack is a Crack s Perspective on Cracking in Asphalt Pavements Presented at the Pavement Performance Prediction Symposium 2007 Laramie, Wyoming Tim Clyne, Roger Olson Minnesota Department of Transportation
More informationFleetOutlook 2012 Release Notes
FleetOutlook 2012 Release Notes Version 7.1 Last Updated: June 15, 2012 Copyright 2012 Wireless Matrix. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 2 Updates to Landmark Features... 2 Defining
More information2016 Congestion Report
2016 Congestion Report Metropolitan Freeway System May 2017 2016 Congestion Report 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...3 Introduction...3 Methodology...4 2016 Results...5 Explanation of Percentage Miles
More informationEXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION Howell Ferry Road Duluth, Gwinnett County, Georgia. WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. Willmer Project No
EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. Prepared For Clark Patterson Lee Suwanee, Georgia Prepared By WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. 3772 Pleasantdale Road Suite 165 Atlanta, Georgia 30340-4270
More informationSchool Driver Trainer Inservice
2014-15 School Driver Trainer Inservice TITLE OF LESSON: CDL FORM TO FINISH Objectives of Lesson: At the end of this lesson, the trainer will be able to: Identify the three (3) forms required to obtain
More informationECE/RCTE/CONF/4/Add.1/Rev.2
ECE/RCTE/CONF/4/Add.1/Rev.2 8 May 2018 Agreement Concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such inspections
More informationRehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics
Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics Dr. W. James Wilde, P.E. Professor, Minnesota State University Director, Center for Transportation Research and Implementation Mankato, Minnesota Mr. Elliott Dick
More informationThe Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Committee 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 395 John Ireland Boulevard
More informationMetropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report
Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center May 2014 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationSignal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.
I. Overview Consultant A was retained by the Ohio Department of Transportation to conduct traffic signal timing analyses on approximately one mile of roadway on between the Main Street and the Fourth Street
More informationRisk Management of Rail Vehicle Axle Bearings
Railway Group Standard Risk Management of Rail Vehicle Axle Bearings Synopsis This Railway Group Standard mandates that there shall be riskbased processes to minimise and detect failures of rail vehicle
More informationPFI Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program for Residential/Commercial Densified Fuels
PFI Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program for Residential/Commercial Densified Fuels Scope: This program must be utilized by participating pellet fuel manufacturers to assure consistent quality
More informationPlan Check Policies and Guidelines
Plan Check Policies and Guidelines VII. A. INTRODUCTION Traffic signing and striping plans are required for all General Plan Roads and any roadway that is 56-foot wide curb-to-curb (78 R/W) or wider. Transportation
More informationEXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT
EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NEED The project is located in Section 6, Township 23 North, Range 9 East and Section 31 Township 24 North, Range 9 East, in the Town of Stockton,
More informationToner Cartridge Evaluation Report # Cartridge Type: EY3-OCC5745
Toner Cartridge Evaluation Report # 03-236 Cartridge Type: EY3-OCC5745 July 31, 2003 Cartridges submitted for evaluation by ELT 708 W.Kenosha Broken Arrow, OK Evaluation and Report By: National Center
More informationForensic Sciences Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC SCIENCES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER IGNITION INTERLOCK RULES
Forensic Sciences Chapter 370-3-1 ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC SCIENCES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 370-3-1 IGNITION INTERLOCK RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS 370-3-1-.01 Ignition Interlock Rules 370-3-1-.01
More informationMinnesota DOT -- RDM Experience. Dr. Kyle Hoegh, MnDOT Dr. Shongtao Dai, MnDOT Dr. Lev Khazanovich, U. of Pittsburgh
Minnesota DOT -- RDM Experience Dr. Kyle Hoegh, MnDOT Dr. Shongtao Dai, MnDOT Dr. Lev Khazanovich, U. of Pittsburgh Acknowledgements FHWA/AASHTO for providing RDM MnDOT district materials and constructions
More informationPembina Emerson Border Crossing Interim Measures Microsimulation
Pembina Emerson Border Crossing Interim Measures Microsimulation Final Report December 2013 Prepared for: North Dakota Department of Transportation Prepared by: Advanced Traffic Analysis Center Upper Great
More informationA SPS Comparison Graphs
A SPS Comparison Graphs This section of the specification document provides either an example of the default graph for each case or instructions on how to generate such a graph external to the program
More informationAIR QUALITY PERMIT. Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus
AIR QUALITY PERMIT Permit No. Effective Date February 11, 2016 In accordance with the provisions of the Georgia Air Quality Act, O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1, et seq and the Rules, Chapter 391-3-1, adopted
More informationRequest for Collision Evaluation
Request for Collision Evaluation Under the Carrier Service s monitoring program, carriers may request that a collision be evaluated to determine if it was non-preventable. Collisions evaluated through
More informationSample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology
Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology Data taken from the Northern Section of I-49 (Capitol Beltway) on June 17, 28 The I-9 Corridor Coalition is a partnership
More informationLCDOT DETOUR PROCEDURES. and GUIDELINES
LCDOT DETOUR PROCEDURES and GUIDELINES LCDOT Traffic Department (847) 377-7400 Rev 2/3/2017 ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS (W20-3) These signs shall be a 48" x 48" Black Legend on Fluorscent Orange Sheeting.
More informationRUTGERS PAVEMENT RESOURCE CENTER RIDE QUALITY TOOLS
192-RU8485 RUTGERS PAVEMENT RESOURCE CENTER RIDE QUALITY TOOLS January 2011 Submitted by Ali Maher, Ph.D. Professor and Director Patrick Szary, Ph.D. Associate Director Nicholas Vitillo, Ph.D. Research
More informationThe Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.
11 ROADWAYS 11.1 General The -Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to meet the requirements of roadways. Roadway classifications include mainline, acceleration lanes, deceleration lanes, auxiliary
More informationASTM D4169 Truck Profile Update Rationale Revision Date: September 22, 2016
Over the past 10 to 15 years, many truck measurement studies have been performed characterizing various over the road environment(s) and much of the truck measurement data is available in the public domain.
More information