PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation
|
|
- Lucinda Norris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation August 2, 2017 LYNX Central Station Open Area 1
2 Modes Screening 2
3 Trunk vs Feeder Trunk Modes High peak capacity Direct routes Feeder Modes Routing may be flexible Serve more dispersed origins and destinations Image Source: ROBERT W. KOSKI 3 GOALS & OBJECTIVES LESSONS MODES ALTERNATIVES HIA EVENTS
4 Trunk Mode: Local Bus Local/City Bus Passengers per vehicle 40 to 45 seated, total Average Daily Ridership 2,700 to 3,200 Typical Route Length Stop Spacing Varies Approximately 1,200 feet Link 436 N Densities : Residential Densities: Employees Capital Costs Operating Costs >3 du/acre 2 to 5 jobs/acre $130K to $135K per mile $190K to $195K per mile Link 28 Defining characteristics - Fixed route and fixed schedule - Mix of federal and local funding 4
5 Trunk Mode: Limited Stop Bus Albuquerque Rapid Ride Red Line Fort Lauderdale, FL Limited-Stop Bus Up to (FastLink) 120 passengers per vehicle Runs in mixed-traffic Passengers per vehicle 40 to 75 seated; 120 total Fewer stops; farther apart Average Daily 300 to 6,000 Ridership Longer routes, connecting city centers to Typical Route Length smaller suburban 5 to 40 miles centers Stop Spacing May have Fewer enhanced stops, farther stations apart Densities: Residential May have 5 to transit 20 du/acre signal priority Densities: Employees Typically >5 have jobs/acre strong branding and image Capital Costs $75K to $200K per mile Regular buses or larger buses Operating Cost $20K to $250K per mile Peak periods or all-day service Defining - Runs in mixed-traffic characteristics Capital Costs: - Longer $1-2 routes, Million/mile connecting city centers to suburban centers - May have enhanced stations - Typically have strong branding and image - Regular buses or larger buses Miami Dade Transit Metrobus Route 34 (Wikipedia) 5 NOTE: High-end limited-stop bus may qualify as FTA s Corridor-Based BRT
6 BRT Types BRT - Silver Ex: Cleveland Healthline Fixed Guideway BRT BRT - Bronze Ex: Eugene Emerald Express Corridor-Based BRT Limited-Stop Bus Ex: FastLinks Local Bus 6 GOALS & OBJECTIVES LESSONS MODES ALTERNATIVES HIA EVENTS
7 Trunk Mode: Bus Rapid Transit Bus Rapid Transit Average Daily Ridership 3,000 to 850,000 Typical Route Length Stop Spacing Densities: Residential 2 to 40 miles 0.5 to 2 miles 5 to >35 du/acre Cleveland Health Line Densities: Employees Capital Costs Operating Cost 5 to >60 jobs/acre $1.7M to $35M per mile $190K to $3M per mile Defining characteristics - Enhanced stations - Off-board fare payment - Branding - Transit signal priority - Can run in mixed traffic or on exclusive lanes - Rubber tire vehicles with modern design Orlando Downtown LYMMO 7
8 Elements of Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Based BRT Operates in mixed traffic Frequent bi-directional service on weekdays Defined stations Transit Signal Priority Short headway times *FTA BRT Categories Fixed Guideway BRT Operates in exclusive lane on >50% of alignment during peak periods Frequent bi-directional service on weekdays and weekends Defined Stations Transit Signal Priority Short headway times 8
9 Elements of Bus Rapid Transit *FTA BRT Categories Corridor Based BRT* Operates in mixed traffic Frequent bi-directional service on weekdays Defined stations Transit Signal Priority Short headway times Fixed Guideway BRT* Operates in exclusive lane on >50% of alignment during peak periods Frequent bi-directional service on weekdays and weekends Defined Stations Transit Signal Priority Short headway times BRT Standard Ranking Criteria Criteria Available Points BRT Basics Dedicated Right-of-Way 8 Busway Alignment 8 Off-Board Fare Collection 8 Intersection Treatments 7 Platform-Level Boarding 7 Service Planning Multiple Routes 4 Express, Limited and Local Services 3 Control Center 3 Located in Top Ten Corridors 2 Demand Profile 3 Hours of Operations 2 Multi-Corridor Network 2 Infrastructure Passing Lanes at Stations 4 Minimizing Bus Emissions 3 Stations Set Back from Intersections 3 Center Stations 2 Pavement Quality 2 Stations Distances Between Stations 2 Safe and Comfortable Stations 3 Number of Doors on Bus 3 Docking Bays and Sub-Stops 1 Sliding Doors in BRT Stations 1 Communications Branding 3 Passenger Information 2 Access and Integration Universal Access 3 Integration with Other Public Transport 3 Pedestrian Access 4 Secure Bicycle Parking 2 Bicycle Lanes 2 Bicycle Sharing Integration 1 9
10 Trunk Mode: Bus Rapid Transit BRT - Bronze BRT - Silver BRT - Gold Eugene Emerald Express Cleveland s Healthline Bogota s Transmilenio Photo source: Wikipedia
11 Trunk Mode: Modern Street Car Portland, OR Washington, DC Portland Streetcar Modern Streetcar Exclusive Lanes or mixed traffic Average Runs Daily on Ridership embedded 15,200 steel to rail 27,300 tracks Typical Route Length 1 to 7 miles Typical station spacing is between ½ mile to 1 Stop Spacing mile Between ½ to 1 mile Densities: Historic Residential trolleys or 20 modern to 35 du/acre street car Densities: Short Employees segments, can 60 jobs/acre be 5 miles or less within Capital Costs urban core and neighborhoods $25M to $50M per mile Operating Typically Cost slower in $1.8M speeds to $2.2M than LRT per mile Capital Costs: $25 to $50 Million/mile Defining characteristics - Exclusive lanes or mixed traffic - Runs on embedded steel rail tracks - Short segments, can be 5 miles or less within urban core and neighborhoods - Typically slower in speed than LRT 11 Seattle Streetcar
12 Trunk Mode: Light Rail Transit Light Rail Average Daily Ridership 16,200 to 23,200 Typical Route Length Stop Spacing Densities: Residential Densities: Employees 5 to 25 miles Between 1 to 3 miles 5 to 35 du/acre 60 jobs/acre Charlotte Blue Line MAX Green Line Capital Costs Operating Cost $45 to $130M per mile $15M to $40M per mile Defining characteristics - Electric powered rail cars typically propelled by overhead wires (some battery sections) - Can operate in mixed-traffic or exclusive ROW - Dedicated stations; off-board ticketing - Typically in urban centers and neighborhoods 12
13 Trunk Mode: Commuter Rail Commuter Rail SunRail, FL MARC Train, MD Average Daily Ridership 3,600 Exclusive lanes Typical Route Length 30 to 98 miles Diesel powered locomotives Stop Spacing 3+ miles Longer distance, commuting Densities: travel Residential 1.3 to 35 du/acre Densities: Typical Employees station spacing is >30 3 miles jobs/acre or more Capital Costs $38M per mile Can cross streets but typically Operating Cost $1.1M per mile separated from roadway ROW Typically shares or uses freight Defining characteristics - Exclusive lanes corridors - Diesel powered trains Capital Costs: $3 to $25 - Longer distance, commuting travel Million/mile - Typically shares or uses freight corridors - Can cross streets but typically separated from roadway ROW 13
14 Trunk Mode: Heavy Rail Chicago L Train Heavy Rail Typically consist of steel-wheeled, electric Average Daily powered Ridership vehicles operating 60,000 in or trains more of two or more cars Typical Route Length 14 to 30 miles Provides regional, urban type of service Stop Spacing 1 to 5 miles Typical distance between stations in the urban core is less than one mile while in the periphery Densities: between Residential 1 and 5 miles 12 to 35 du/acre Densities: Does Employees not operate in roadway >200 jobs/acre rights-of-way Capital Costs Capital Costs: $50 to $250 $50M Million/mile to $250M per mile Operating Cost $4.5M to $20M per mile Washington D.C. Metro Defining characteristics - Steel-wheeled, powered by in-ground electrified third rail - Provides regional, urban type of service - Does not operate in roadway rights-of-way 14
15 High Speed Rail Northeast Corridor Acela Florida s Brightline High Speed MagLev Rail is relatively new and currently Average has Daily three Ridership public systems 9,000 around to 45,000the Typical world Route (Japan, Length China, 25 and to > South 100 miles Korea) Stop Spacing Average top speeds Varies are between Densities: mph Residential Varies Densities: Operations Employees occur on Varies a raised track above Capital ground; Costs cannot be paired $6.3M with to $510M other per mile transit types Operating Cost $5.7M per mile Technology based on magnet attraction and repulsion; may have less track noise but more wind noise than other rail modes) Capital Costs: $100 to $650 Million/mile Defining characteristics - Similar characteristics as commuter rail transit but at substantially higher speeds - Typically operates at speeds of up to 150 mph, and with dedicated tracks can exceed 200 mph - Does not operate in roadway rights-of-way - Used for intercity and interstate travel 15
16 MagLev (Magnetic Levitation) Shanghai MagLev JR-MagLev in Japan MagLev MagLev is relatively new and currently Average has Daily three Ridership public systems 10,000 around to 20,000 the Typical world Route (Japan, Length China, 4 and to 600 South mileskorea) Stop Spacing Average top speeds Varies are between Densities: mph Residential Varies Densities: Operations Employees occur on Varies a raised track above Capital ground; Costs cannot be paired $150M with to $300M other per mile transit types Operating Cost $70M to $100M per year Technology based on magnet attraction and repulsion; may have less track noise but more wind noise than the other worldrail modes) between mph Capital Costs: $100 to $650 Million/mile Defining characteristics - Relatively new mode currently has three public systems around - Average top speeds range - Operations occur on a gradeseparated track; cannot be paired with other transit types - May have less track noise but more wind noise than other rail modes 16
17 Feeder Modes On-Demand Transit Circulator Pictured: LYNX s NeighborLink (LYNX) Pictured: International Drive I-Ride Trolley (Wikipedia) 17
18 Feeder Modes Driverless Shuttles and Buses Personal Rapid Transit Pictured: Navya s Arma (Navya) Pictured: International Drive I-Trolley (Wikipedia) 18
19 Feeder Modes Automated People Movers Vanpool Pictured: Orlando International Airport s APM (GOAA) Pictured: LYNX s Vanpool (LYNX) 19
20 Feeder Modes Gondola Uber Pool/Lyft Line Pictured: La Paz s Mi Teleferico (Wikipedia) 20
21 Feeder Modes Monorail Pictured: Orlando Disney s Monorail (Disney) 21
22 Screening Project Alternatives Issues, opportunities, goals, objectives? What are our alternatives? What alternatives best meet our goals, and objectives? Which alternative do we want to move forward? How can we fund and implement the preferred alternative? Level 1 (Modes)ES Level 2 (Alignments & Segments) NTS/ Level 3 (Modes, Alignments/Segments, Operating Plans, General Station Characteristics) GOALS & OBJECTIVES LESSONS MODES ALTERNATIVES HIA EVENTS
23 ECON. DEV T BIKE/ PED TRANSIT Goals Level 1 Screening Objectives Level 1 Screening Criteria (Modes)* Improve transit travel times Existing and future pop. and emp. densities Improve transit travel time reliability/on-time performance support the mode's ridership potential Increase transit service frequency Existing and anticipated future ridership support Provide effective connections to other transportation infrastructure this mode Enhance transit amenities Mode is a proven technology in North America Serve existing and new customers Provide biked/ped amenities at transit stations Easy and simple accessibility of mode from Provide effective bike/ped connectivity to the stations bike/ped perspective Provide safe and comfortable bike/ped facilities Increase ability for bike/ped crossing Reduce bike/ped injuries and fatalities Serve existing destinations/centers Mode demonstrated potential to influence Serve areas with high redevelopment potential economic activity Serve areas where plans call for transit-supportive environments Ability for mode to adapt to evolving land use Provide substantial and permanent transit infrastructure patterns Provide roadways that support multimodal access Permanence or significance of infrastructure associated with this mode Minimize adverse environmental impacts 23 * Evaluated for more than 50% of the corridor
24 IMPLEMENTATION VEHICLE RELIA- BILITY Level 1 Screening Goals Objectives Level 1 Screening Criteria (Modes)* Reliable automobile travel times Right-of-way needs Incorporate access management and site design consistent with Potential impact of modes on automobile access land use and transportation contexts and turning movements Optimize transportation infrastructure through TSM&O Reduce vehicle crashes resulting in fewer fatalities and injuries Provide cost-effective infrastructure and operating plans Potential for adverse environmental impacts and Increase opportunities for partnerships to leverage transportation ROW costs investments Requires major corridor improvements Implement transportation investments that support healthy Relative capital cost of this mode community outcomes Relative operating cost of this mode Implement strategic incremental investments Ability for mode to be modified with minimal Implement community-supported strategies impacts and costs to meet the short- and longterm needs of the corridor * Evaluated for more than 50% of the corridor 24
25 25
26 Trunk Screening Pop. and emp. density Local bus Limited-stop bus Corridor Based BRT Fixed Guideway BRT BRT-Gold Modern Streetcar Light rail transit Commuter rail Heavy rail High speed rail Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No MagLev Ridership present Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Proven in North America Easy/simple accessibility Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Influence economic activity Low Low Medium High High High High Medium High High Adapt to land use changes High High High Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Low Low Permanence of infrastructure Low Low Medium High High High High High High High High ROW Needs Low Low Low High High Medium High High High High High Impact on auto access/turns Environmental/ROW impacts Low Low Low Medium High Medium High High Medium Medium Medium Low Low Medium Medium High Medium High High High High High Req s major improvements Low Low Medium High High High High High High High High Relative capital cost Low Low Low Medium Medium High High High High High High Relative operational cost Low Low Low Low Low Medium Medium High High High High 26 Potential for simple mods High High High Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Low Low
27 Discussion 27
28 Feeder Screening Pop. and emp. density Ridership present Proven in North America Easy/simple accessibility On-demand transit Vanpool Circulator Uber Pool/Lyft Line Driverless shuttles and buses Personal Rapid Transit Automated People Movers Gondola Monorail Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Influence economic activity Low Low Medium Low Low Low Medium Medium Low Adapt to land use changes Permanence of infrastructure ROW Needs Impact on auto access/turns Environmental/ROW impacts Uses existing infrastructure Relative capital cost Relative operational cost High High High High Medium Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low High High High High Low Low Low Low Medium High High High High Low Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Low High High High High Low Low Low Low Medium High High High High Low Low Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium High Low Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium Medium 28 Potential for simple mods High High High High Medium Low Low Low Low
29 Discussion 29
30 Next Steps Next PAWG meeting: September 14, 2017 Present long list of alternatives Present process for refining long list HIA Working Group in August 30,
31 Thank You! 31
PAWG Meeting #2. May 17, 2017 LYNX Central Station Open Area
PAWG Meeting #2 May 17, 2017 LYNX Central Station Open Area 1 SR 434 I-4 Study Area 23 Miles along SR 436 Regional and gateway corridor Connects 7 jurisdictions 11 LYNX routes along and 8 LYNX routes across
More informationPublic Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.
Public Meeting June 15, 2017 5:30 7:30 p.m. Welcome 2015 Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study 2015 Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study 2017 Norfolk Westside Transit Study HRT and the
More informationAPPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]
APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY] Jackson/Teton Integrated Transportation Plan 2015 Appendix I. Fixed-Guideway Transit Feasibility Jackson/Teton County Integrated Transportation Plan v2
More informationStreetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015
Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences March 2015 How Are Streetcar and Light Rail Different? The design differences between streetcar and light rail are tied to the distinctions in the markets served
More informationBus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL
Bus Rapid Transit Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL What is Bus Rapid Transit? BRT is an enhanced bus system that operates on bus
More informationWhat is the Connector?
What is the Connector? The Connector is a plan for a high-capacity transit system from northeast to south Ann Arbor, connecting major destinations including downtown, commercial, and residential areas,
More informationWhat IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY
What IS BRT, Really? 2007 Winter TexITE Meeting Presented by Jeff Arndt, TTI Not BRT and RNY 1 What is Bus Rapid Transit? A flexible, rubber-tired from of rapid transit that combines stations, vehicles,
More informationFACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview
FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Bus Alternative Description/Overview Bus systems typically operate in mixed traffic and have minimal station infrastructure. Bus service typically
More informationSERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES
VTA TRANSIT SUSTAINABILITY POLICY: APPENDIX A SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted February 2007 COMMUNITYBUS LOCALBUS EXPRESSBUS BUSRAPIDTRANSIT LIGHTRAILTRANSIT STATIONAREAS S A N T A C L A R A Valley Transportation
More informationEUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT (BRIEF) Table of Contents EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (USA)... 1 COUNTY CONTEXT AND SYSTEM DESCRIPTION... 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW... 1 PLANNING
More informationAn Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009
An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics Date April 30, 2009 Land Use and Transportation Is there a link? Streetcar Suburbs were the result of land developers creating streetcar lines in order
More informationKendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study What
More informationExecutive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009 Background As the Treasure Valley continues to grow, high-quality transportation connections
More informationPublic Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development
Public Meeting City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development Funded by Regional Transportation Authority September 12, 2011 In partnership with Presentation
More informationNeeds and Community Characteristics
Needs and Community Characteristics Anticipate Population and Job Growth in the City Strongest density of population and jobs in Ann Arbor are within the Study Area Population expected to grow 8.4% by
More informationAugust 2, 2010 Public Meeting
Public Meeting LYMMO Expansion Alternatives Analysis Study Purpose of study is to provide a fresh look at potential LYMMO expansion, following Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Alternatives Analysis
More informationService Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:
Over the past decade, much attention has been placed on the development of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems. These systems provide rail-like service, but with buses, and are typically less expensive to
More informationI-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis
I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Public Meetings: North Charleston, January 25, 2016 Charleston: January 26, 2016 Summerville: January 28, 2016 Agenda I. Project Update II. III. IV. Screen Two
More informationGreater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager Greater Cleveland RTA Overview Service Area Population of 1.5 million Customers Served 200,000 on a typical weekday 1.6 million
More informationWaco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi Mitchell, Project Manager AECOM
More informationDowntown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island
Downtown Transit Connector Making Transit Work for Rhode Island 3.17.17 Project Evolution Transit 2020 (Stakeholders identify need for better transit) Providence Core Connector Study (Streetcar project
More informationNortheast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study
Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study Feb. 7-9, 2012 Agenda Review project background Progress summary Recommended alternatives for
More information4 Evaluation Process and Initial Alternatives Considered
4 Evaluation Process and Initial Alternatives Considered Introduction This chapter contains the following elements: A summary of the evaluation criteria used in general and for Screen 1 A description of
More information6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
June 7, 2018 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
More information6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
June 7, 2018 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
More informationPacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis
Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis Transit Coalition September 26, 2012 2 Study Area Pacific Electric Rightof-Way/West Santa Ana Branch (PEROW/ WSAB) extends
More informationStatus of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Status of Plans March 2011 Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Transit project update Project rationale The system New Britain Hartford Busway New Haven/Hartford/ Springfield Passenger Rail
More informationTempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016
Tempe Streetcar March 2, 2016 Tempe Profile 40 sq. miles, highest density in state University Town, center of region Imposed growth boundaries (density increase) Mixed use growth/intensifying land use
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis 7/24/2013 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Initial Screening Analysis Methodology... 1 Screening...
More informationStreetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. February 2015
Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences February 2015 How Are Streetcar and Light Rail Different? The design differences between streetcar and light rail are tied to the distinctions in the markets
More information5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS When the METRO Green Line LRT begins operating in mid-2014, a strong emphasis will be placed on providing frequent connecting bus service with Green Line trains. Bus hours
More informationKANSAS CITY STREETCAR
KANSAS CITY STREETCAR KAREN CLAWSON MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL KANSAS CITY STREETCAR Regional Context Alternatives Analysis Kansas City Streetcar Project KANSAS CITY REGION KANSAS CITY REGION KANSAS
More informationTransit on the New NY Bridge
Transit on the New NY Bridge TZB Cross Section North bridge incorporating 12ft shared use path and space for future bus lane South bridge with space for a future bus lane Gap between the two decks for
More informationPublic Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School
Public Meeting March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School Today s Meeting Purpose 2 Where We Are The Process What We ve Heard and Findings Transit Technologies Station Types Break-out Session Where We Are
More informationDevelop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional
Project Overview TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WHAT ARE THE PROJECT GOALS? Transportation transportation hub. Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional Land Use
More informationBROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,
More informationPEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps
PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP Current Status & Next Steps PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP Why Peachtree? Why Now? I. THE CONTEXT High Level View of Phasing Discussion Potential Ridership Segment 3 Ease
More informationAttachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Attachment 5 High Speed Transit Planning Study Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch Stantec Consulting Ltd. Transportation Management & Design, Inc. with Lea Consulting Ltd. [135-35130]
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 2018 What is the More MARTA Atlanta program? The More MARTA Atlanta program is a collaborative partnership between MARTA and the City of Atlanta to develop and implement a program
More informationUS 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing February 16, 2017 Project Goals Improve the quality of transit service Improve mobility opportunities and choices Enhance quality of life Support master
More informationWest Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015
West Broadway Transit Study Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015 Introductions Community Engagement Summer Outreach Fall Outreach Technical Analysis Process Update Alternatives Review Economic
More informationGO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan
GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan GO Transit s 2020 Service Plan describes GO s commitment to customers, existing and new, to provide a dramatically expanded interregional transit option
More informationTier 3 Screening and Selection. of the Recommended Alternative KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. June Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis
LAKE COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY Ticket and Transportation Center Walt Disney / Reedy Creek Improvement District CR 535 John Young Parkway 441 17 92 Florida s Turnpike VE 92 mee Hall JOHN YOUNG PKY 192 OAK ST
More informationClick to edit Master title style
Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES September 22, 2015 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW & WORK TO DATE 1. Extensive stakeholder involvement Throughout 2. System and market assessment
More informationDRAFT Subject to modifications
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M DRAFT To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 7A From: Date: Subject: Staff September 17, 2010 Council Meeting High Speed Rail Update Introduction The
More informationPreliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives
3.0 What preliminary alternatives are being evaluated? The alternatives for the East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor project that were considered for screening include the No Build Alternative, Transportation
More informationCharlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration Legislative Committee on Urban Growth and Infrastructure Carolyn Flowers CEO Charlotte Area Transit System March 23, 2010 Charlotte Region
More informationHillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007
Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007 Transit Technologies Technologies Considered Bus Light Rail Commuter Rail Bus Standard or articulated high-capacity vehicles
More informationWELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops
WELCOME Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops Sponsored by Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Greater Buffalo Niagara Regional Transportation Council Where do you live? Where do you
More informationKendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From
More informationV03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT
V03 APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August 2016 Green Line LRT 2 Presentation Outline Past Present Future 3 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 4 4 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 5 5 16/03/2016 6 6
More informationKenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)
Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Commuter Rail #147925 November 6, 2009 1 Guidance of KRM Commuter Rail Studies Intergovernmental Partnership Technical Steering Committee Temporary and Limited Authority
More informationCentral City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014
Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing July 24, 2014 Project Description The Central City Line is a High Performance Transit project that will extend from Browne
More informationJTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design
JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS Improving System Performance Through Urban Design Overview Agenda Overview of Jacksonville & JTA Catalysts for a Transit Driven Complete Streets Program Process Countermeasures
More informationCharlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer
Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer House Select Committee March 2018 1 Charlotte Long-Term Growth Management Strategy Centers, Corridors and Wedges Five
More information12/10/2018. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
December 6, 2018 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
More information4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES
4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES The Tier 2 Alternatives represent the highest performing Tier 1 Alternatives. The purpose of the Tier 2 Screening was to identify the LPA utilizing a more robust list of evaluation
More informationRestoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles
Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles Early Scoping Meeting for Alternatives Analysis (AA) May 17, 2011 Introduction Key players Local lead agency: Metro Federal lead agency:
More informationMetro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017
Metro Reimagined Project Overview October 2017 Reimagining Metro Transit Continuing our Commitment to: Provide mobility based on existing and future needs Value the role of personal mobility in the quality
More information3. PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES
3. PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES The purpose of the Preliminary Definition of Alternatives is to introduce the alternatives, including modes and off- and on-airport routes that will be carried
More informationDraft Results and Open House
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Draft Results and Open House Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014 Today s Agenda Introductions Outreach efforts and survey results Other updates since last meeting Evaluation results
More informationExecutive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
More informationBrian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute
Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Source: WCVB TV, Boston BRT is an enhanced bus system that operates on bus lanes or other transitways in order to combine the flexibility of buses
More information7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the comparative analysis of the four Level 2 build alternatives along with a discussion of the relative performance of the
More informationCTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016
CTfastrak Expansion Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016 Today s Agenda Phase I Update 2016 Service Plan Implementation Schedule & Cost Update Phase II Services Timeline Market Analysis
More informationCommunity Outreach Meetings
Community Outreach Meetings BCT At A Glance 410 square miles service area More than 41.5 million annual trips 327 fixed-route buses 44 bus routes 78 Community Buses in 19 Municipalities BCT At A Glance
More information6.0 Transit Technology Assessment
6.0 Transit Technology Assessment 6.1 Introduction One of the first steps in the Southeast Corridor High Performance Transit Alternatives Study was to create a summary of the many different types of transit
More informationRELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982
Subject MINISTERIAL BRIEFING NOTE Rapid Transit in Auckland Date 1 November 2017 Briefing number BRI-1133 Contact(s) for telephone discussion (if required) Name Position Direct line Cell phone 1 st contact
More informationInformal Business Discussion Minutes Tuesday, May 3, :00 PM 1. Transportation
Official Informal Business Discussion Minutes Tuesday, May 3, 2016 3:00 PM Present: Charlotte J. Nash, Jace Brooks, Lynette Howard, Tommy Hunter, John Heard 1. Transportation Comprehensive Transportation
More informationInternational and USA BRT TOD Comparisons. Cliff Henke and Kimi Iboshi Sloop, Parsons Brinckerhoff
International and USA BRT TOD Comparisons Cliff Henke and Kimi Iboshi Sloop, Parsons Brinckerhoff Rail-Volution October 2013 Agenda BRT basic concepts International examples Principles of Good TOD and
More informationCEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update
CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update EECUTIVE SUMMARY DECEMBER 2015 Executive Summary In 2013, the Twin Cities metropolitan area s first bus rapid transit (BRT) line, the METRO Red Line,
More informationMountain View Automated Guideway Transit Feasibility Study Community Meeting September 25, 2017
Mountain View Automated Guideway Transit Feasibility Study Community Meeting September 25, 2017 Jim Lightbody, City of Mountain View Jenny Baumgartner, Lea+Elliott Eileen Goodwin, Apex Strategies 1 Agenda
More informationChicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor
Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Past, Present, and Future Arun Rao, Passenger Rail Manager Wisconsin Department of Transportation Elliot Ramos, Passenger Rail Engineer Illinois Department
More informationRapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality
City of Charlotte Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality Transportation Oversight Committee Carolyn Flowers CEO Charlotte Area Transit System April 29, 2010 Charlotte Region Statistics Mecklenburg
More informationRTSP Phase II Update
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority RTSP Phase II Update Presentation to the Technical Advisory Group July 18, 2013 Meeting 1 Presentation Outline RTSP Integration with Momentum RTSP Process
More informationTier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis
LAKE COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY Ticket and Transportation Center Walt Disney / Reedy Creek Improvement District CR 535 John Young Parkway 441 17 92 Florida s Turnpike VE 92 mee Hall JOHN YOUNG PKY 192 OAK ST
More informationSTRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN DECEMBER 2016 STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN MOBILITY OPTIONS & CORRIDORS
DECEMBER 2016 STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN MOBILITY OPTIONS & CORRIDORS March 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 High-Capacity Transit Options... 4 Light Rail Transit (LRT)... 5 Bus Rapid Transit
More informationMPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies
Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, 2007 Transit Technologies 1 Technologies Considered Bus Light Rail Commuter Rail Bus Standard or articulated high-capacity vehicles
More informationUnified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report
Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report REVISIONS 1. Table 39: New Public Investments for Operation and Maintenance Costs 2. Appendix A-10: Passenger Rail Service - Operations
More informationI-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager
I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results Public Meeting Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager March 4 & 5, 2008 Today s Agenda Overview of Alternatives
More informationBi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis Prepared for: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning and Project Development May 2005 Prepared by: in conjunction
More informationDenver Metro Association of Realtors
Denver Metro Association of Realtors North Metro Rail Line October 2, 2014 1 The RTD FasTracks Plan 122 miles of new light rail and commuter rail 18 miles of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service 31 new Park-n-Rides;
More informationDraft Results and Recommendations
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Draft Results and Recommendations Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System
More informationClifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Great Lakes Community February 11, 2016
Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Briefing to Great Lakes Community February 11, 2016 Neighborhood Concerns and Requests Provide a general overview and background of the project What are the different
More informationRestoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles
Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles Alternatives Analysis Community Update Meeting August 2, 2011 Introduction Key players Local lead agency: Metro Federal lead agency: Federal
More informationChapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation
Chapter 4 : THEME 2 Strengthen connections to keep the Central Area easy to reach and get around 55 Figure 4.2.1 Promote region-wide transit investments. Metra commuter rail provides service to the east,
More information2030 Multimodal Transportation Study
2030 Multimodal Transportation Study City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department Prepared by Ghyabi & Associates April 29,2010 Introduction Presentation Components 1. Study Basis 2. Study
More informationLeadership NC. November 8, 2018
v Leadership NC November 8, 2018 Planning for our region s growth The Triangle is one of the fastestgrowing regions in the nation. More than 2 million people are already part of the equation, and the
More informationLEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT
LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT 1. How are walking and bicycling distance measured? A. Straight-line radius from a main building entrance B. Straight-line radius from any building entrance
More informationGreater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese - General Manager
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Joe Calabrese - General Manager RTA Ridership by Mode! 500 Buses - 75 %! 60 Heavy Rail Vehicles - 10%! 24 RTV s (BRT) - 8%! 48 Light Rail Vehicles - 6%! Paratransit
More informationAssessing Streetcar Feasibility in Your Community. Rail~Volution. Thomas Brennan Nelson\Nygaard Nygaard Consulting September 9, 2005
Assessing Streetcar Feasibility in Your Community Rail~Volution Thomas Brennan Nelson\Nygaard Nygaard Consulting September 9, 2005 Recapturing the heart of America! Historic and modern streetcars are making
More informationSTRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016 Shift Rapid Transit Initiative Largest infrastructure project in the city s history. Rapid Transit initiative will transform London s public transit
More informationTRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)
TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) The panel for the Transit IDEA program has endorsed a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategic initiative and focus area as part of the Transit IDEA
More informationBus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners
Bus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners Paul Bignardi, AICP - Principal Planner San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Graham Carey, PE Principal careybrt Consulting Peter Gabancho,
More informationHOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit
HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation www.reason.org/transportation Basic Thesis: Current Transportation Plans Need Rethinking
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo 1/4/2013 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents Introduction... 1 1. Markets... 1 External Markets... 1 Intra-Corridor Travel...
More informationThe Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry
The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry June 22, 2016 Presentation to I-95 Corridor Coalition Jerome M. Lutin, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Director of Statewide & Regional Planning
More informationClifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Medlock Area Neighborhood Association (MANA) February 15, 2016
Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative Briefing to Medlock Area Neighborhood Association (MANA) February 15, 2016 Neighborhood Concerns and Requests Provide a general overview and background of the project
More informationFINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit
Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link Prepared for: Sound Transit Prepared by: Quade & Douglas, Inc. FINAL March 2005 Foreword This issue paper
More information