FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY
|
|
- Peregrine Atkinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 To: From: Subject: Electronic Distribution Recipients MINNESOT DEPRTMENT OF TRNSPORTTION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No T-02 November 8, 2011 ernard J. rseneau, P.E., PTOE Deputy Commissioner / Chief Engineer Rumble Strips and StripEs on Rural Trunk Highways Expiration This Technical Memorandum supersedes both No T-03 (Edgeline Rumble StripEs Guidance for Rural Trunk Highways) and No TS-02 (Rumble Strips on Shoulders of Rural Trunk Highways) and shall remain in effect until November 8, 2016 unless superseded prior to this date or incorporated into the MnDOT Standard Plans, the Road Design Manual, and/or Traffic Engineering Manual. Implementation This policy shall be in effect for all programmed rural highway projects where the paved surface is constructed, reconstructed, or overlaid with a scheduled letting date after pril 1, This does not include preventive maintenance projects such as chip seals and microsurfacing; however, preventive maintenance projects on surfaces that have existing rumble strips or stripes shall ensure that these are perpetuated in accordance with the standards within this Technical Memorandum, particularly with respect to depth. District personnel should make every effort to implement this policy for projects which have been let prior to pril 1, 2012 and on which rumble strip and rumble stripe construction have not yet begun. ny paving constructed by MnDOT forces is exempt from the requirements of this Technical Memorandum. This policy applies to all projects on Rural Trunk Highways where the posted speed limit is 55 mph or higher. For the purpose of this Technical Memorandum a Rural Trunk Highway is defined in the Definitions section. Districts may implement this policy on Urban Trunk Highways. While this policy provides for standards that will require an increased use of rumble strips and stripes, it also provides for more flexibility and discretion on the part of the District. Notably, the District has the discretion for the preferred lateral placement and width of the shoulder rumble strip in order to abate noise concerns, accommodate bicyclists, acknowledge pedestrian use, and manage pavement conditions. The guidelines contained in this Technical Memorandum apply to all Rural Trunk Highways. However, other road authorities are encouraged to evaluate their needs accordingly. Introduction Detailed crash analysis has shown that lane departure crashes, such as run off the road, sideswipe and head-on crashes, on rural two-lane two-way highways in Minnesota result in an over represented number of fatalities and serious injuries. oth traditional pavement markings and rumble strips are used to decrease the number of lane departure crashes. Following the lead of other states, MnDOT experimented with combining traditional pavement markings and rumble strips into a rumble stripe, where the pavement marking is installed on the rumble strip. MnDOT issued guidance for the use of edgeline rumble stripes as part of Technical Memorandum No T-03. The NCHRP Report 641 shows that the use of rumble strips both on the shoulder and beneath the centerline result in a significant reduction of targeted crashes. This report can be found at the following -MORE-
2 Technical Memorandum No T-02 Rumble Strips and StripEs on Rural Trunk Highways November 8, 2011 Page 2 URL: dditionally, numerous states in the region have enacted systematic policies to require rumble strips and rumble stripes on their trunkline roadways. Michigan, Missouri, and North Dakota have policies requiring centerline rumble stripes, plus edgeline rumble stripes or shoulder rumble strips, on most of their rural trunkline roadways with higher speed limits. Iowa has a current statewide policy requiring the implementation of 4-foot paved shoulders and shoulder rumble strips on roads with DTs greater than Wisconsin has no policy on rumble stripes, but has shoulder rumble strips extensively on its trunkline roadway network. This Technical Memorandum strengthens the provisions of both Technical Memoranda that are being combined. ll of the requirements of the Technical Memorandum No TS-02 (Rumble Strips on Shoulders of Rural Trunk Highways) are still in place. The difference is that the requirement now extends to all high-speed rural roads where the paved shoulder is 4 or greater, instead of 6 or greater in the previous Memo. lso, the intention of this Technical Memorandum is to emphasize the use of centerline rumble stripes, and also provide stronger language and guidance than currently exists in Technical Memorandum No T-03 (Edgeline Rumble StripEs Guidance for Rural Trunk Highways). Studies have shown that the ambient noise decibel level generated by a vehicle driving over a properly constructed rumble strip is comparable to that of a truck passing by on a standard, non-rumbled surface. The noise from rumble strips may be more noticeable as the public is more accustomed to truck traffic, the frequency of the sound is different, and rumble hits tend to be more of an impulse noise. Purpose To provide centerline rumble stripes and/or shoulder rumble strips on all Rural Trunk Highways to reduce lane departure crashes, to provide increased centerline visibility during rainy conditions, and to guide motorists during snowy conditions when striping visibility is poor. Guidelines Definitions Shoulder Rumble Strips These are defined as rumble strips outside of the edgeline. Rumble StripEs Rumble stripes are defined as a rumble strip that contains a pavement marking stripe. These will be referred to as either edgeline rumble stripes or centerline rumble stripes. Rural Trunk Highway This is defined as a roadway segment that has minimal residential or commercial development, with little or no further development anticipated in the future. Officially, rural segments will be defined by language in Chapter 2 of the MnDOT ccess Management Manual. (Refer to the attached Reference 1, which shows the rural definition on page 10 in Chapter 2 of the MnDOT ccess Management Manual.) Requirements Shoulder Rumble Strips Shoulder rumble strips shall be placed on all rural highway projects where shoulders are constructed, reconstructed, or overlaid and where the posted speed limit is 55 mph or greater, and the paved shoulder width is 4 feet or greater. (This is a change from the previous standard, where shoulder rumble strips were required on highway paved shoulders of at least 6 feet in width.) Shoulder rumble strips may also be placed on rural trunk highways on shoulders less than 4 feet in width. The location of the shoulder rumble strip will depend upon the width of the shoulder see Figure 1 (Two-Way ituminous Roadway with Paved Shoulder Section View), Figure 2 -MORE-
3 Technical Memorandum No T-02 Rumble Strips and StripEs on Rural Trunk Highways November 8, 2011 Page 3 (Two-Way Concrete Roadway with Paved Shoulder Section View) and Figure 3 (Shoulder Rumble Strip on Divided Roadways) for typical dimensions. The District has the discretion for the lateral placement of the shoulder rumble strip in order to abate noise concerns and to accommodate bicyclists. Shoulder rumble strips shall also be placed on the left shoulder of multi-lane divided roads. Centerline Rumble StripEs Centerline rumble stripes shall be placed on all rural highway construction and maintenance projects where bituminous pavement is constructed, reconstructed, or overlaid and where the posted speed limit is 55 mph or greater. This applies to both multi-lane undivided and two-lane undivided highways. Centerline rumble stripes will not be required until pril 1, 2014 for concrete pavements that are constructed, reconstructed, or overlaid. This will allow the Department time to test out various installation methods on concrete pavement. Exceptions On rural highways where the paved shoulder width is 2 feet or less, shoulder rumble strips or edgeline rumble stripes may be placed on both sides of the road in lieu of a centerline rumble stripe. In all cases, edgeline rumble stripes may be substituted for shoulder rumble strips and still meet the standards within this Technical Memorandum. Shoulder rumble strips are not required in areas where there is a bus shoulder. However, it is assumed that bus shoulders will usually be installed in areas that are NOT defined as rural trunk highways in the ccess Management Guide. Shoulder rumble strips are not required in locations with guardrail or cable barrier implemented. Even in cases where shoulder rumble strips are not required due to a narrow paved shoulder width, their installation or the installation of an edgeline rumble stripe is encouraged for proactive safety reasons. Districts shall consider placing centerline rumble stripes and shoulder rumble strips on in-place shoulders at locations on which no construction, reconstruction, or overlay projects are scheduled in the near future as a systematic proactive safety measure. The District Materials Engineer should make recommendations regarding the structural adequacy of the in-place roadway and/or shoulder to receive rumble strips. Width of rumble strips Rumble strips are usually 12 in width. The width of the rumble strip can be reduced to within the range of 8-12 when paved roadway width is limited. 16 rumble is required on freeway segments. ny design of rumble strips that are smaller than 8 in width or that deviate from the 12 corrugation cycle detailed in Figures 4 through 8 shall require approval by the State Traffic Engineer. The standard width of rumble strips for centerline rumble stripes is 16. ny reduction from this shall require approval by the State Traffic Engineer. ll rumble strips shall meet any and all specifications for Milled Rumble Strips in the MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction or Special Provisions. This includes a requirement that rumble strips be milled in bituminous pavement, and not rolled. -MORE-
4 Technical Memorandum No T-02 Rumble Strips and StripEs on Rural Trunk Highways November 8, 2011 Page 4 The placement of shoulder rumble strips and edgeline rumble stripes with respect to the traveled lane (shown in Figures 1 through 5, 7, and 8) may be deviated from at the discretion of the District. Such variation will be considered as informal design exception(s) and must be documented per Road Design Manual section Modifications for concrete pavement On concrete paved roadway surfaces, there are two options for how to install shoulder rumble strips. They include: Installing 3 long structural rumble strips on alternating panels, and also shoulder rumble strips on the adjacent paved bituminous shoulder. (Refer to Figures 2, 3C, and 7) Milling in either continuous or intermittent shoulder rumble strips outside the edgeline, but on the concrete surface. (Refer to Figures 3D and 8.) Centerline rumble stripes will not be required on concrete pavements until pril 1, 2014 in order test out various installation methods; but if they are to be installed, the current recommended installation is two 8 wide rumbles on either side of the centerline joint (each 2 away from the joint). Shoulder rumble strips on Figure 8 and the rumble strips beneath the centerline marking in Figures 7 and 8 may be hand formed in construction, so long as the final dimensions conform to the depth and pattern in the typical drawing of Section - in Figure 8, and the appropriate respective width called out in this Technical Memorandum. icycle travel on shoulders Shoulder widths that provide less than 4 feet of clear space with rumble strips are not considered adequate to accommodate bicyclists. Where practical and feasible, Districts are encouraged to provide a minimum of a 6 foot paved shoulder where shoulder rumble strips will be placed on trunk highways with existing or potentially significant bicycle travel. In order to meet the needs of bicyclists, flexibility has been built in to this Tech Memo. s stated above and reflected in the attachments, rumble strips as narrow as 8 as well as edgeline rumble stripes may be used at the discretion of the District. lso, while the dimensions in Figures 1 through 4 indicate the typical lateral placement of the shoulder rumble strip, the District has the discretion to deviate from this configuration with input from the State icycle Coordinator. Quality control of the lateral placement of rumble strips on these sections must be ensured. The longitudinal rumble strip pattern for shoulder rumble strips and edgeline rumble stripes on non-freeway segments is to include a 12 gap in each 60 cycle. Refer to Figures 4 and 5. This remains a standard from the previous two Technical Memoranda that are being combined. Districts may increase the gap from 12 in downhill sections with the approval of the State Traffic Engineer. Questions For information on the technical contents of this memorandum, please contact the State Work Zone and Pavement Marking Engineer at (651) ny questions regarding publication of this Technical Memorandum should be referred to the Design Standards Unit, DesignStandards.DOT@state.mn.us. link to all active and historical Technical Memoranda can be found at To add, remove, or change your name on the Technical Memoranda mailing list, please visit the web page ttachments: Reference 1 Figures END-
5 REFERENCE 1: Rural Definition from the MnDOT ccess Management Manual Mn/DOT ccess Management Manual Subcategory Rural This subcategory is intended for trunk highway segments that extend through agricultural, open, or forested areas with limited development. It is also assigned to areas planned for long-term, low-density development, characterized by scattered, large-lot residential development and limited commercial or industrial use. Highway segments outside municipalities are generally designated as Rural (Subcategory ), unless the area is undergoing or planned for urban-scale development. Highways in this subcategory are generally expected to operate at speeds of 50 mph or more; however, in areas lacking a complete supporting local road network, these highways will also be required to provide direct access to adjacent property. Special attention should be given to transition areas on the fringe of growing municipalities where local zoning may permit urban-type development without corresponding requirements for streets and utilities. Since the private access allowance in Rural (Subcategory ) areas is more permissive than in Urbanizing (Subcategory ) areas, it is important to appropriately categorize these transition areas in order to maintain long-term safety and mobility goals for the corridor. In some geographically-large municipalities, full urbanization may not be anticipated within the next 20 (or more) years. Highway segments extending through areas of municipalities planned to remain rural in character are designated Rural (Subcategory ). Figure 2.3 illustrates a municipal area with both a Rural (Subcategory ) segment that extends into an area that is not planned for development and an Urbanizing (Subcategory ) segment that extends into a transition area outside the city s boundary. Figure 2.3: Category ssignments in a City Rural Urbanizing Urban Core City oundary
6 FIGURE 1 - TWO-WY ITUMINOUS RODWY WITH PVED SHOULDER - SECTION VIEW FIGURE 1 (ITUMINOUS PVEMENT OPTION 1 - SHOULDER RUMLE STRIPS) 4 0" OR GRETER 4 0 OR GRETER 8"-1 RUMLE GP FIGURE 1C CENTERLINE S CENTERLINE S 4 0" OR GRETER 4 0 OR GRETER LESS THN 4 0" LESS THN 4 0" 8" RUMLE STRIP 8"-1 RUMLE (3) 16 RUMLE (CONTINUOUS) (1) VR. (2) VR. (2) FIGURE 1 (ITUMINOUS PVEMENT OPTION 2 - EDGELINE RUMLE S) 16 RUMLE (CONTINUOUS) (1) GP CENTERLINE S (ITUMINOUS PVEMENT WITH LESS THN 4 PVED SHOULDERS) 16 RUMLE (CONTINUOUS) (1) 8" RUMLE STRIP GP TYP. TYP. ( MIN.) ( MIN.) (1) CENTERLINE RUMLE REQUIRED ON TWO-WY ITUMINOUS RODWYS ONLY. SEE FIG. 6 FOR DETILS. (2) WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6 ; 1 WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS 6 OR GRETER. (3) INTERMITTENT PTTERN. USE 8" RUMLE STRIP/ WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6. 8"-1 RUMLE (3) 8"-1 RUMLE
7 FIGURE 2 - TWO-WY CONCRETE RODWY WITH PVED SHOULDER - SECTION VIEW FIGURE 2 (CONCRETE PVEMENT OPTION 1 - STRUCTURL EDGELINE ND SHOULDER RUMLE STRIPS) C L 4 0" OR GRETER 4 0 OR GRETER 8"-1 RUMLE STRIP (2) LESS THN 4 0" RUMLE RUMLE CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH FIGURE 2 FIGURE 2C CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH CENTERLINE S CENTERLINE S RUMLE (CONCRETE PVEMENT OPTION 2 - EDGELINE RUMLE S) CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH 8 CENTERLINE S RUMLE 8"-1 RUMLE STRIP (2) 4 0" OR GRETER 4 0 OR GRETER 1 RUMLE RUMLE (OPTIONL) (1) 8 RUMLE (OPTIONL) (1) 1 RUMLE (CONCRETE PVEMENT WITH LESS THN 4 PVED SHOULDERS) C L C L 8 8 RUMLE (OPTIONL) (1) 8 8 LESS THN 4 0" (1) CENTERLINE RUMLE OPTIONL. SEE FIGS. 7 ND 8 FOR DETILS. (2) USE 8" INTERMITTENT WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS EQUL TO OR GRETER THN 6 ND LESS THN 8. USE 1 INTERMITTENT WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS 8 OR GRETER. NOT NECESSRY WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6. (3) WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6 USE GROUND-IN INTERMITTENT OPTION. STRUCTURL RUMLES MY E USED IN LL OTHER CSES. SEE FIG. 7 ND 8 FOR RUMLE STRIP OPTIONS, PLCEMENT, ND DIMENSIONS.
8 FIGURE 3 - SHOULDER RUMLE STRIP ON DIVIDED RODWYS - SECTION VIEW FIGURE 3 ITUMINOUS FREEWY (ONE RODWY SHOWN) MEDIN SHOULDER OUTSIDE SHOULDER 16"RUMLE STRIP (CONTINUOUS) MEDIN SHOULDER 16"RUMLE STRIP (CONTINUOUS) MEDIN SHOULDER MEDIN SHOULDER 16" RUMLE 1 RUMLE STRIP FIGURE 3 ITUMINOUS MULTI-LNE (ONE RODWY SHOWN) FIGURE 3C CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH FIGURE 3D CONCRETE FREEWY/MULTI-LNE OPTION (ONE RODWY SHOWN) CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH CONCRETE FREEWY/MULTI-LNE OPTION (ONE RODWY SHOWN) 8" RUMLE 2 RUMLE 1 RUMLE 16"RUMLE STRIP 2 (CONTINUOUS) OUTSIDE SHOULDER VR. (1) 16"RUMLE STRIP OUTSIDE SHOULDER 16" RUMLE STRIP (2) OUTSIDE SHOULDER (1) WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6 ; 1 WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS 6 OR GRETER. (2) USE 8" INTERMITTENT WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS EQUL TO OR GRETER THN 6 ND LESS THN 8. USE 1 INTERMITTENT WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS 8 OR GRETER. USE 16" CONTINUOUS ON FREEWY. NOT NECESSRY WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6. (3) SEE FIG. 7 ND 8 FOR RUMLE STRIP OPTIONS, PLCEMENT, ND DIMENSIONS.
9 FIGURE 4 - ITUMINOUS SHOULDER RUMLE STRIP FIGURE 4 - PLN VIEW 8-16 VR. (1) 8"- 16 VR. (1) WIDTH 7" ( + - CONTINUOUS 1/) INTERMITTENT PTTERN WIDTH 7" (+ - 1/) EDGE OF MINIMUM DEPTH 3/8 MXIMUM DEPTH 1/ 8" - 16 (1) FINISHED SHOULDER 48 RUMLE STRIP 12 GP FIGURE 4 - PLN VIEW 5 WIDTH 7" ( + - 1/) EDGE OF MIN. DEPTH 3/8 MX. DEPTH 1/ 5" UNIFORMLY 1 SHOULDER WIDTH SECTION - SECTION - (1) REFER TO FIGURES 1 ND 3 FOR SPECIFIC PPLICTIONS.
10 FIGURE 5 - ITUMINOUS EDGELINE RUMLE FIGURE 5 - PLN VIEW CONTINUOUS PTTERN 8"- 1 8"- 1 WIDTH 7" ( + - 1/) PINT WIDTH 7" (+ - 1/) PINT MINIMUM DEPTH 3/8 8" - 1 (1) 48 RUMLE FINISHED SHOULDER MXIMUM DEPTH 1/ EDGE OF FIGURE 5 - PLN VIEW INTERMITTENT PTTERN 5 WIDTH 7" ( + - 1/) 12 GP MIN. DEPTH 3/8 MX. DEPTH 1/ 5" UNIFORMLY 1 SHOULDER SHOULDER SECTION - SECTION - (1) USE 8" RUMLE WHERE SHOULDER WIDTH IS LESS THN 6.
11 FIGURE 6 - ITUMINOUS CENTERLINE RUMLE - PLN VIEW WIDTH 7" (+ - 1/) SECTION - MINIMUM DEPTH 3/8 MXIMUM DEPTH 1/ C L WIDTH 7" ( + - 1/) MIN. DEPTH 3/8 MX. DEPTH 1/ 1 SECTION -
12 FIGURE 7 - CONCRETE PVEMENT OPTION - STRUCTURL RUMLE STRIP CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH PVED SHOULDER WIDTH WIDTH MINIMUM DEPTH 3/8 MXIMUM DEPTH 1/ 15 0" PNEL (TYP.) 3 0" RUMLE STRIP SECTION C-C EDGE OF CONCRETE PVEMENT PLN VIEW 36" EDGE OF FINISHED SHOULDER 18 (TYPICL) (1) CENTERLINE RUMLE (OPTIONL) (2) EDGE OF PVED SHOULDER 1" RDIUS 1"DEPTH EDGE OF CONCRETE PVEMENT D C C MIN. DEPTH 3/8 MX. DEPTH 1/ 1 WIDTH 7" 8" 8" ( + - 1/) C L (3) D 6" SECTION D-D SECTION - SECTION - (1) FOR DIVIDED RODWYS USE 1 0" ON INSIDE LNE ND 2 0" ON OUTSIDE LNE. (2) OMIT ONE CORRUGTION SO THT THERE IS T LEST 6" CLERNCE ON EITHER SIDE OF TRNSVERSE JOINT. (3) INTERMITTENT DESIGN SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRTION PURPOSES. REFER TO FIGURE 4 FOR INTERMITTENT PTTERN.
13 FIGURE 8 - CONCRETE PVEMENT OPTION - CONCRETE RUMLE STRIP CONCRETE PVEMENT WIDTH WIDTH 8" MINIMUM DEPTH 3/8 MXIMUM DEPTH 1/ (2) 15 0" PNEL (TYP.) CENTERLINE RUMLE (OPTIONL) (2) 8" - 1 (1) SECTION - C L SECTION C-C EDGE OF CONCRETE PVEMENT FINISHED SHOULDER PLN VIEW WIDTH 7" ( + - 1/) MINIMUM DEPTH 3/8 MXIMUM DEPTH 1/ EDGE OF CONCRETE PVEMENT (3) 8" (2) C C MIN. DEPTH 3/8 MX. DEPTH 1/ 1 SECTION - (1) REFER TO FIGURES 2 ND 3 FOR SPECIFIC PPLICTIONS. (2) OMIT ONE CORRUGTION SO THT THERE IS T LEST 6" CLERNCE ON EITHER SIDE OF TRNSVERSE JOINT. (3) CONTINUOUS DESIGN SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRTION PURPOSES. REFER TO FIGURE 4 FOR INTERMITTENT PTTERN.
14 FIGURE 9 - SHOULDER RUMLE STRIP - PPROPRITE REKS 50 FT. FIGURE 9 LEFT TURN LNE RUMLE STRIPS RUMLE STRIPS RUMLE STRIPS FIGURE 9 RIGHT TURN LNE 50 FT. RUMLE STRIPS RUMLE STRIPS RUMLE STRIPS FIGURE 9C ENTRNCE RODS 130 FT. RESIDENTIL/ COMMERCIL ENTRNCE OR FRONTGE ROD FIELD ENTRNCE FIGURE 9D CCELERTION LNE FIGURE 9E DECELERTION LNE
15 FIGURE 10 - CENTERLINE RUMLE - PPROPRITE REKS (1) TOWNSHIP ND COUNTY RODS, COMMERCIL ENTRNCES, ND RESIDENTIL ENTRNCES WITH 200 REK ENGINEER S DISCRETION STRIP CENTERLINE RUMLE S 200 REK STRIP CENTERLINE FIELD ENTRNCES RUMLE S (1) PVEMENT S ND STRIPING SHLL E COMPLINT WITH THE CURRENT TRFFIC ENGINEERING MNUL ( TEM ) ND THE CURRENT MINNESOT MNUL OF UNIFORM TRFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ( MN/MUTCD )
2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary
8" Physical gore ( ) ( ) 250 Varies 250 TYPICAL RUMBLE STRIP PLACEMENT AT EXIT AND ENTRANCE RAMPS This distance may vary This distance may vary ( ) 2 16" edge of R=12" Max ( ) Physical gore Texturing 1.
More informationOverview. Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public Relations Considerations
Victor Lund, PE, Traffic Engineer St. Louis County, Minnesota October 11, 2018 Overview Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public
More informationCreated by: St. Louis County
Created by: Victor Lund, PE Traffic Engineer St. Louis County Ken Johnson, PE, PTOE State WZ, etc. MnDOT Why do workers want speed limits? How effective are speed limits in work zones? New legislation
More informationKDOT PROJECT # 106 KA
Page 1 of 10 KDOT PROJECT # FEDERL PROJECT # HSIP-450(101) KDOT PROJECT # FEDERL PROJECT # HSIP-450(101) Project Location #8 Page 2 of 10 01/05/2017 JG FED # HSIP-450(101) This project is for cutting shoulder
More information1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 14 - MISCELLANEOUS 1400 GENERAL... 14-3 1415 RUMBLE STRIPS (INCLUDING STRIPES) IN THE ROADWAY... 14-4 1415-1 General... 14-4 1415-2 Transverse Rumble Strips... 14-4 1415-2.1 General...
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. TRB Straight to Recording for All. Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB Straight to Recording for All Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges NCHRP Synthesis Report 490: Practice of Rumble Strips and Rumple Stripes NCHRP Project 20-05,
More informationSupport: The Crossbuck (R15-1) sign assigns right-of-way to rail traffic at a highway-rail grade crossing.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad and Light Rail Transit Technical Committee DATE OF ACTION: June 25, 2004 TOPIC: Crossbuck with Yield or Stop Signs and Advance Signs. STATUS: Accepted by the National Committee
More informationCurrent Corridor Characteristics. MN 62 Corridor Performance
Corridor Context The corridor runs 12 miles between I-494 and MN 55 south of Minneapolis. The corridor serves as an important East-West connection for the Metro area. A portion of the corridor has been
More informationTRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Portable Temporary Rumble Strips (PTRS) SPECIFIC SUBJECT: Guidelines for the
More informationExpert System on Guidance for the Application of Shoulder & Centerline Rumble Strips/ Stripes
FHWA-WY-15/02 State of Wyoming Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Expert System on Guidance for the Application of Shoulder & Centerline Rumble
More informationUS 10 Corridor Performance
Corridor Context The corridor runs northwest 18 miles from I-35W to the edge of Anoka County. The corridor connects the cities of Ramsey, Anoka,, Mounds View, and Blaine. Current Corridor Characteristics
More informations Contact the Area Construction Engineer at for RAP sample location. Page 2 of 10
Page 1 of 10 Page 2 of 10 Page 3 of 10 Ú City limit or Urban boundary No Centerline rumble strips Centerline rumble strips City connecting link or Urbanized (Unincorporated city) TYPICAL CITY CONNECTING
More informationDISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual
DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards Unit ISSUED BY: Office of Project Management and Technical Support TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO.
More informationSession 123 Rumble Stripes: Opportunity to Improve Safety and Retroreflectivity
Session 123 Rumble Stripes: Opportunity to Improve Safety and Retroreflectivity Presented March 6, 2013 by Alan Plunkett, INDOT Bill Smith, INDOT Tom Brennan, Purdue Alan Plunkett/Bill Smith US 231 MOTIVATION
More informationEXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT
EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NEED The project is located in Section 6, Township 23 North, Range 9 East and Section 31 Township 24 North, Range 9 East, in the Town of Stockton,
More informationTraffic Regulations Guidelines
Traffic Regulations Guidelines PREPARED BY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY June, 2012 Providing the highest quality transportation services for economic benefit and improved quality of life. MDOT Traffic and Safety
More informationPopulation Trends. US 12 Corridor Performance
Corridor Context The corridor runs over 81 miles from Willmar to the Twins Cities metropolitan area. It connects the Twin Cities and the cities of Montrose, Howard Lake, Cokato, Dassel, Litchfield, Atwater,
More informationCh. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS
Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS 67 157.1 CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS Subchap. A. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 157.1 B. NOISE LIMITS... 157.11 C. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS... 157.21 D. INSTRUMENTATION...
More informationConventional Approach
Session 6 Jack Broz, PE, HR Green May 5-7, 2010 Conventional Approach Classification required by Federal law General Categories: Arterial Collector Local 6-1 Functional Classifications Changing Road Classification
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 2/19/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationAccommodation of Bicyclists and Nearby Residents in Rumble Strips/Stripes Policies
0 0 0 0 TRB 0 Accommodation of Bicyclists and Nearby Residents in Rumble Strips/Stripes Policies Mohamed M. Ahmed*, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie,
More informationWork Zone Safety Initiatives and Research Efforts. Irene Soria Safety Evaluation Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation Safety Engineering
Work Zone Safety Initiatives and Research Efforts Irene Soria Safety Evaluation Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation Safety Engineering TES Conference - October 17 th, 2012 Outline Work Zone
More informationDELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT
200' TYP. 0' < EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS END OF MERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR ALL 2-LANE MERGES EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS A MERGE FROM THE RIGHT AND NO OFFSET IN THE THROUGH LANES END OF MERGE LANE TAPER 200'
More informationChapter 4 COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM
Chapter 4 COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM Table of Contents 4.0 Background...4-3 4.1 Safety Improvement Projects SHOPP 201.010 Program...4-3 4.1.1 Spot Improvements..4-3 4.1.2 Wet Improvements...4-4 4.1.3
More informationDIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB
DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB 20 (6m) 25 (7.5m) Desirable outline of parking area 10 (3m) 16 (4.8m) 50 (15 m) R 75 (23m) R Taper Alternate outline of 20 (6m) R parking area Pave shoulders
More informationAlberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn
Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn Bill Kenny P.Eng, Director: Design, Project Management and Training, Technical Standards Branch. - July 2011 What are Rumble Strips? A preventative
More informationTwo-Lane, Two-Way Roads
Two-Lane, Two-Way Roads road consisting of two opposing lanes of undivided traffic. Two-Lane Two-Way *Drawings Not To Scale mndot.gov/fieldmanual Field Manual January 08 Intermediate Volume Up to 00 DT
More information800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design
Table of Contents 801 Access Control... 8-1 801.1 Access Control Directives... 8-1 801.2 Access Control Policies... 8-1 801.2.1 Interstate Limited Access... 8-1 801.2.2 Limited Access... 8-1 801.2.3 Controlled
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
THE PROJECT Last updated on 9/8/16 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What s happening on Highway 169? The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning to rebuild and repair the infrastructure on
More informationMedian Barriers in North Carolina
Median Barriers in North Carolina AASHTO Subcommittee on Design - 2006 June 13-16, 2006 Jay A. Bennett North Carolina DOT State Roadway Design Engineer Brian Murphy, PE Traffic Safety Engineer Safety Evaluation
More informationEffectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips
Effectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips Chris Poole, Iowa Department of Transportation Peter Savolainen, Iowa State University Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium August 16,
More informationAASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 Highlights and Major Changes Since the 1994 Edition Jim Mills, P.E. Roadway Design Office 605 Suwannee Street MS-32 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
More informationDevelopment of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development of Safety Performance Functions
LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN CONFERENCE FOR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (LACCEI 2014) Development of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development
More informationTRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT JUNE 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Street Design Standards 1.1 Right-of-Way Requirements 1.2 Median Openings 1.3 Sidewalks 1.4 Traffic
More informationPurpose and Need Report
Purpose and Need Report State Highway (SH) 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 Williamson County, Texas (CSJ: 0337-02-045) Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. Date: November, 2015 The environmental
More informationMICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA) CFS:TEH 1 of 10 APPR:KPK:JFS:07-07-16 FHWA:APPR:07-15-16 a. Description. This
More informationPage 1 of KA
Page 1 of 10 5 Contact the Area Engineer at 620-384-7821 for RAP sample location. Page 2 of 10 SS-1HP or approved alternate shall be used for Tack. Page 3 of 10 Ú City limit or Urban boundary No Centerline
More informationCHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards
9.00 Introduction and Goals 9.01 Administration 9.02 Standards 9.1 9.00 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS City streets serve two purposes that are often in conflict moving traffic and accessing property. The higher
More informationEMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY
Cowlitz 2 Fire & Rescue Policies and Operating Guidelines Policy: EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY Number Effective Date Approved and Issued: 4001 8/28/02 8/28/02 1.0 REFERENCE 23 CFR Part 650 Subpart C Code of
More informationITASCA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SIGN POLICY
ITASCA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SIGN POLICY 09/27/2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND... 1 2. POLICY STATEMENT... 1 3. SIGN RETROREFLECTIVITY MANAGEMENT METHOD... 1 4. TRAFFIC
More informationReview of Milled Rumble Strips on Alberta Roads
Review of Milled Rumble Strips on Alberta Roads Tamara Soltykevych, E.I.T., Alberta Transportation Muzaffar Ahmad, P.Eng, Alberta Transportation Bill Kenny, P.Eng, Alberta Transportation Paper prepared
More informationI-394 Corridor Performance
Population Trends Corridor Context The corridor runs from edge of Hennepin County to downtown Minneapolis and serves the cities of Delano, Independence, Medina, and Wayzata. City Population 2000 2010 2,088
More informationPOLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS
POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS MCHENRY COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION 16111 NELSON ROAD WOODSTOCK, IL 60098
More information.MAINTENANCE. Strategic Initiative Four:
The accompanying fact sheets explain specific components of the department s effort to prioritize maintenance activities. This information provides the basis of ODOT s 2001 Strategic Initiative Four: Re-Defining
More informationVirginia Department of Transportation
Virginia Department of Transportation! " # $% & ' # % & ' #" The action team included people representing varying interests in the objective at hand. VDOT Utility coordinators Traffic Engineers Maintenance
More informationMedian Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section
Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section Background In 1998 North Carolina began a three pronged approach to prevent and
More informationGreater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Bus Stop Design Guidelines
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Bus Stop Design Guidelines Contents Purpose... I Bus Stop Design & Location... 1 Bus Stop Planning... 1 Bus Stop Safety & Consolidation... 1 As Needed Basis...
More informationSection 6H.01 Typical Applications
December 27, 2010 Draft Page 6H-1 Section 6H.01 Typical Applications Support: 01 Whenever the acronym TTC is used in this Chapter, it refers to temporary traffic control. 02 The needs and control of all
More informationANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS
ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS Introduction The Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) initiated a feasibility study in the fall of 2012 to evaluate the need for transit service expansion
More informationUnderstanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois
Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois Priscilla Tobias, P.E. Mouyid Islam, Ph.D. Kim Kolody, P.E. Optional Agenda Image Title Background Workflow
More informationRural Two-Lane Roadways in Louisiana
Impact of Pavement Edge Line on Vehicular Lateral Position on Narrow Rural Two-Lane Roadways in Louisiana Xiaoduan Sun Jaehyun Park University of Louisiana at Lafayette Dean Tekell Nina Ludington Dean
More informationTRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy
A. GENERAL Speed humps are an effective and appropriate device for safely reducing vehicle speeds on certain types of streets when installed accordance with the provisions of this policy. In order for
More information2016 Congestion Report
2016 Congestion Report Metropolitan Freeway System May 2017 2016 Congestion Report 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...3 Introduction...3 Methodology...4 2016 Results...5 Explanation of Percentage Miles
More informationMetropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report
Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center May 2014 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationCHAPTER 2 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT
2.200 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT Section 2.201 GENERAL PROVISIONS... 2.2-1 Section 2.202 FENCES AND VISIONS CLEARANCE... 2.2-2 2.202.01 Fences... 2.2-2 2.202.02 Vision
More informationINTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION Trunk Highway 22 and CSAH 21 (E Hill Street/Shanaska Creek Road) Kasota, Le Sueur County, Minnesota November 2018 Trunk Highway 22 and Le Sueur CSAH 21 (E Hill Street/Shanaska
More informationCUYAHOGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC CONTROL STANDARDS
CUYAHOGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC CONTROL STANDARDS Supplement to O.D.O.T. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MANUAL November 26, 2013 Revisions to the June 22, 2011 edition are noted by a vertical line
More informationINLAND NORTHWEST REGIONAL PAVEMENT CUT POLICY
INLAND NORTHWEST REGIONAL PAVEMENT CUT POLICY Howard Hamby Spokane County Road Maintenance Administrator PAVEMENT CUT FAILURES 1. Sloughing 2. Poor Compaction 3. Poor
More informationWe recommend you keep a copy of this ordinance with you while you are off-roading.
ARTICLE IV. Operation of off-road vehicles, motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles We recommend you keep a copy of this ordinance with you while you are off-roading. DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 70-85. -
More informationParking Management Strategies
Parking Management Strategies Policy Program Potential Effectiveness (percent reduction in demand) Comments Parking Pricing Unbundling and Cash-Out Options Reduced Parking Requirements Transit/TOD Supportive
More informationWork Zone Safety & New Interstate Resurfacing Provision
2017 CAPA Presentation Work Zone Safety & New Interstate Resurfacing Provision Steve Kite, PE State Work Zone Engineer Work Zone Safety Data In 2016, Approximately 600 construction projects across NC (not
More informationTITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
NOTE: This is a courtesy copy of this rule. The official version can be found in the New Jersey Administrative Code. Should there be any discrepancies between this text and the official version, the official
More informationHighway 23 New London Access & Safety Assessment. Public Open House #2 October 3, :00 to 7:00 PM
Public Open House #2 October 3, 2017 5:00 to 7:00 PM Highway 9 OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT Assessment Limits Highway 23 from County Road 40 to North Shore Dr Purpose: Identify opportunities to reduce serious
More informationPERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS
PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS WORK DESCRIPTION 3 WORK DESCRIPTION 4 WORK DESCRIPTION 6 New Install Maintenance / Replace Temporary 603 SIGNS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Install new signs and maintain and replace
More informationDRIVEWAY/APPROACH PERMIT APPLICATION Applicant Type: Architect/Engineer Contractor Owner
DRIVEWAY/APPROACH PERMIT APPLICATION Applicant Type: Architect/Engineer Contractor Owner Lake Elmo City Hall 651-747-3900 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Project Address: Property Owner:
More informationHarlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th
Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th Public Meeting #2 March 13, 2018 Summit Park District Welcome to the second Public Meeting for the preliminary engineering and environmental studies of Illinois 43
More informationDRIVEWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
DRIVEWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES These guidelines are provided to assist you in the construction of your driveway to help you determine: The best location on your property. What you need to
More informationPN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS
PN 420-10/21/2016 - SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS DESCRIPTION: The surface tolerance specification requirements are modified as follows for all pavements of constant width with at least
More informationTRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS
Approved: Effective: August 22, 2017 Review: June 21, 2017 Office: Traffic Engineering and Operations Topic No.: 750-010-011-e Department of Transportation PURPOSE TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS To
More informationTransportation accomplishments
1 1 Welcome Transportation accomplishments Federal Funding State Funding Challenges Future Projects 2 Transportation Project: The NDDOT had a record construction season in 2011. Completed $595.6 million
More informationSINGLE 4" 4" 1-Size 2 reflector. 1-Size 1 reflector. unit. unit. Yellow, White or Red Type B or C Reflective Sheeting FLX GND, SRF GND 12" 12"
REFLECTOR UNIT SIZES FOR DELINETORS ND S DELINETORS D & OM DESCRIPTIVE CODES SIZE 1 SIZE 2 SIZE 3 SIZE 4 SINGLE DOULE INSTL DEL SSM (D-XX)SZ X (XXX)XXX(XX) + ˆ" + ˆ " 1" 1" S FLX, SRF OM-1 OM-2X OM-2Y
More informationCHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.
CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides Note: Located at https://mdotjboss.state.mi.us/tssd/tssdhome.htm May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site. GEO-650-D Flares
More informationThe Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Committee 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 395 John Ireland Boulevard
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: David J. Decker Decker Properties, Inc. 5950 Seminole Centre Ct. Suite 200 Madison, Wisconsin 53711 608-663-1218 Fax: 608-663-1226 www.klengineering.com From: Mike Scarmon, P.E.,
More information3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY
3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY Introduction This section describes the environmental setting and potential effects of the alternatives analyzed in this EIR with regard to safety and security in the SantaClara-Alum
More informationTOWN OF LEICESTER COMMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PARKING RULES & REGULATIONS
TOWN OF LEICESTER COMMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PARKING RULES & REGULATIONS The following rules and orders regulating the parking of vehicles upon streets and highways within the Town of Leicester are
More informationMemorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017
Memorandum engineering planning environmental construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills From:
More informationsafedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02
DISTRIBUTOR 0 Product Manual Ref: PM 017/02 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 3 2.0 The... 3 3.0 How the Functions... 4 4.0 Crash Test Performance... 4 5.0 Characteristics of Terminals... 5 5.1 Gating
More informationALLEGAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION. Adopted by the Board of County Road Commissioners, December 28, Sign Policy
ALLEGAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION Adopted by the Board of County Road Commissioners, December 28, 2016 Sign Policy Common/Policies/Sign Policy 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Purpose and Background.................................
More informationPlan Check Policies and Guidelines
Plan Check Policies and Guidelines VII. A. INTRODUCTION Traffic signing and striping plans are required for all General Plan Roads and any roadway that is 56-foot wide curb-to-curb (78 R/W) or wider. Transportation
More informationTexas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas
1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4472-1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle EFFECTIVENESS OF RUMBLE STRIPS ON TEXAS HIGHWAYS: FIRST YEAR REPORT Technical Report Documentation
More informationDRIVEWAY STANDARDS EXHIBIT A. The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62:
1365 S. Camino del Rio Durango, CO 81303 970-382-6363 DRIVEWAY STANDARDS Resolution 2014-40 EXHIBIT A The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62: Driveway means a roadway,
More information1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 12 - ZONES AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES 1200 GENERAL... 12-5 1201 TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONES... 12-5 1202 SCHOOL ZONES... 12-5 1203 SPEED ZONES... 12-5 1203-1 General... 12-5 1203-2
More informationTxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016
TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE ITS Texas 2016 November 10, 2016 TxDOT- Traffic Operations Division November 10, 2016 Performance Measures (Lonestar ATMS) Lonestar ATMS Upgraded to Support Incident
More informationPublic Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Public Information Packet FY - Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Form Annual Element TIP Projects - TIP Projects Year - Metropolitan Transportation Improvement
More informationSPEED HUMP POLICY and PROCEDURES for RESIDENTIAL AREAS
SPEED HUMP POLICY and PROCEDURES for RESIDENTIAL AREAS City of Panama City, Florida Public Works Department 9 Harrison Avenue Panama City, Florida 32401 Phone: (850) 872-3015 Effective 1/22/08 Table of
More informationEL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD
EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD EMERGENCY APPARATUS ACCESS WAYS STANDARD #B-003 EFFECTIVE 05-05-2009 PURPOSE To establish a consistent guideline for fire access roadways required by
More information1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 12 - ZONES AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES 1200 GENERAL... 12-5 1201 TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONES... 12-5 1202 SCHOOL ZONES... 12-5 1203 SPEED ZONES... 12-5 1203-1 General... 12-5 1203-2
More informationCitizens Committee for Facilities
Citizens Committee for Facilities AGENDA Thursday, December 11, 2014 City Council Chambers 305 3 rd Avenue East -Twin Falls, Idaho 11:30 A.M. AGENDA ITEMS Purpose By 1. Discussion and possible action on
More informationRE: S.P (T.H. 210) in Crow Wing County Located on T.H. 210 from Brainerd (R.P ) to Ironton (R.P )
District 3 Administration 7964 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 Memo To: Dan Anderson Transportation District Engineer From: Scott Zeidler Senior Engineering Specialist Date: December 11, 2017 RE:
More informationCONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...
Speed Hump Program CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 1. GENERAL... 3 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS... 3 A. PETITION... 3 B. OPERATIONAL AND GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF
More informationSTAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING
STAFF REPORT #17-2000-0007 CHANGE OF ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: November 16, 2017 (Applicant Provided Materials / Traffic Study = Blue) 1. APPLICATION: A public hearing for an application
More informationRevised Evaluation Scores. System Preservation
Revised Evaluation s System Preservation This page provides a summary of any revisions made to the draft scores presented at the October th Attributable Funds mmittee meeting. The information below highlights
More informationCITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2014 Location: Ann Arbor District Library Attendees: 40 citizen attendees Ann Arbor Station Environmental Review Public Meeting Meeting Notes Meeting #2 The second public meeting
More informationMISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET NUMBER
DESIGN DESIGNATION A.A.D.T - XXXX = XXXX V = XX M.P.H PLANS FOR PROPOSED HIGHWAY INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET DESCRIPTION NUMBER TITLE SHEET ----------------------- 1 TYPICAL SECTIONS (TS) (1 SHEET)-- QUANTITIES
More informationStreet Lighting Policy. Revision
Street Lighting Policy Revision 5-2017 Grand Chute Street Lighting Policy - 1 - May 2, 2017 Intent: The intent of this policy is to outline the Town of Grand Chute s standards for the installation and
More informationSTH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report
#233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development
More informationNCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: ITEM NUMBER: TOPIC: ORIGIN OF REQUEST: AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: NCUTCD Proposal for Changes
More informationIllinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop
Illinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop Roadway Departure & MASH DRAFT IDOT Facilitator: Dave Piper ATSSA Facilitator: Jim Thonn 1 Illinois Emphasis Area Priority Pyramid 2 Fatalities and
More informationSN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON
STANDARD NOTES SN01 2 OF 17 STANDARD NOTES SN02 3 OF 17 SITE PREP & T.E.S.C. NOTES GENERAL NOTES SITE PREP & T.E.S.C. PLAN SP01 4 OF 17 SITE PREP & T.E.S.C. NOTES GENERAL NOTES SITE PREP & T.E.S.C. PLAN
More information