Promotion of Road Safety by NCAP in JAPAN. December 2 nd 2014

Transcription

1 Promotion of Road Safety by NCAP in JAPAN December 2 nd 2014 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism National Agency for Automotive Safety &Victims Aid (NASVA) 1

2 1. Relationship between Ministry and NASVA We implement easy access environment for the public to choose safer car and enhance their mind for safety. This is one of the main pillars of vehicles safety measures, it will be necessary to enrich further more. (Administrative Reform Promotion Meeting, December 20, 2013) By MLIT NTSEL ASV Project Safety Regulations Mitigation of road traffic accidents JNCAP By MLIT NTSEL JASIC By MLIT NASVA MLIT : Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism NTSEL : National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory JASIC : Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center 2

3 2. History of JNCAP Test items New Car Assessment Ⅰ. Crash Safety Full-overlap Frontal Collision Test Offset Frontal Collision Test Side Collision Test Rear Impact Sled Test Ⅱ. Pedestrian Protection Overall evaluation (2000) Head Protection Performance Test Side Curtain Airbag evaluation (2008) Evaluation of Rear Seat Passengers (2009) New overall evaluation (2011) Occupant Protection Against Electrical Shock After Collision (2011) Leg Protection Performance Test Ⅲ. Passenger Seat Belt Reminder Test Ⅳ. Seat Belt Usability Test Ⅴ. Braking Performance Test Ⅵ. Advanced Safety Tech. Assessment Child Seat Assessment Crash speed increased (2012) 3

4 3. JNCAP tests for overall evaluation Passenger Protection Performance Evaluation Full-overlap Frontal Collision Test - Test Speed: 55km/h - Driver Seat & Front Passenger Seat Pedestrian Protection Performance Evaluation Pedestrian Head Protection Test - Test Speed: 35m/h Offset Frontal Collision Test - Test Speed: 64km/h - Driver Seat & Rear Seat Side Collision Test - Test Speed: 55km/h - DMB: 950kg - Driver Seat Pedestrian Leg Protection Test - Test Speed: 40km/h - Flex-PLI Seat Belt Reminder Evaluation Neck Injury Test - Test Speed (Δv): 20.0km/h - Driver / Passenger Seat This mark shows that high-voltage battery electrolyte leakage performance and high-voltage battery fastening status has been met. 4

5 4. Pedestrian Protection and Seat Belt Reminder With the consideration of the pedestrian protection measures, the new overall evaluation has been started since FY2011. Occupant Protection (100 points) Pedestrian Protection (100 points) Head protection Passenger Seat Belt Reminder (8 points) Passenger seat belt reminder Leg protection 5 Overall evaluation for vehicle safety Total score: 208 points 5

6 5. Significance of NCAP NCAP suggests the effect to death toll reduction 6,000 5,000 4,000 start examination of enforcement Starts assessment(passenger protection performance test) 乗車中の死者数 ( 人 ) *Car occupants deaths 歩行中の死者数 ( 人 ) *pedestrian deaths 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Start of pedestrian protection performance test Start of overall evaluation which weighs more on pedestrian tests H 元 H NCAP reflecting the actual traffic accident data Succeeding model, improvement made based on the result JNCAP. Transition of the assessment highest evaluation (5* prize) in recent years year Highest remarks by the model No. of 5 star pt(Lexus:CT200h) 3 models pt (Mitsubishi; Outlander) 6 models pt(TOYOTA; CROWN) 7 models* including 1 mini-car model Average Score year Passenger vehicle Mini-car pt 146.8pt pt 156.0pt pt 160.7pt 6

7 6. Results in Star Award :7 models Top rating :TOYOTA CROWN(189.7pt) Top rating in Mini-sized car : HONDA N-WGN(178.8pt) 5 TOYOTA Crown Hybrid HONDA N-WGN - Pop-up bonnet system - A backseat, a seat belt with a pretension system, force limiter system and seat belt reminder system - A backseat, a seat belt with a force limiter system and seat belt reminder system 7

8 Death toll by road accidents 7. Our subject and measures In order to prevent the damage of the elderly people, the pedestrian and the bicycle driver, to prevent the accident itself is important. The future road safety image by vehicle safety measures Reduction by the measure on post-collision damage mitigation Reduction by the measures on advanced technology The number of accident what the elderly people are large concerned 120, ,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 平成平成平成平成平成 Number of 1989 元年 年 年 年 年 accident 件数 24,169 42,249 67, ,93 111,21 Death toll ratio of the elderly people; pedestrian year Death toll 1,584 人 Over 65 age 70% (2013) 8 The spread of advanced safety technology which avoids a collision is indispensable.

9 8. Progress of Advanced Safety Technology Assessment 1.The outline of Advanced Safety Technology Assessment Steering committee decided in 2014 (1) Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEBS)[test protocol] (2) Lane Departure Warning System (LDWS) [test protocol] (3) Overall evaluation of Advanced Safety Technology [evaluation and publication method] 2. Implementation of AEBS and LDWS (1) Test start from April 2014; Test result was released on October 23 rd, (2) Use of a logo mark; Manufactures can release the result with the use of Logo. Logo

10 9. The flow of the tests Determination of test model Selected by Steering Committee according to vehicle sales or commissioned by manufactures Procurement of test vehicle Once test vehicle is procured, sealed marking should be made Preparation and implementation of test Confirmation of the vehicle number and seal of the test vehicle, etc. Preparation based on the test method (safety assurance, break-ins) Analysis of the test results Hearing opinion on the basis of the technical knowledge The final confirmation in Steering Committee and WG Publication of the results MLIT and NASVA publish test results periodically on Website (We have announced 26 models altogether this time) Sealed marking Preparation for test 10

11 10. AEBS test and evaluation(1) 1. Test scenarios two scenarios: CCRs (stationary) and CCRm (moving) Test vehicle Target Standard line CCRs 10 ~ Km/h 0Km/h CCRm 35 ~ 60Km/h 20Km/h 2. Scopes for function (1) AEBS: Evaluation for braking systems which avoid collision/ decelerate automatically(carried out releasing accelerator) (2)FCWS:Evaluation for warning/braking assist system* (*)Assuming a situation where strong braking is not possible for the elderly, etc. while listening to the warning After the alarm: accelerator OFF in 1.0s and braking ON in 1.2s 11

12 死亡 + 重傷事故の社会損失額 ( 億円 ) 11. AEBS test and evaluation(2) 3. The index of evaluation tested with each scenario speed by 5-km/h for every function (Max.34 conditions) The speed reduction rate at the time of a collision is calculated for every test. The speed reduction rate = ΔV0 - ΔVC ΔV0 Vo: Initial relative velocity, Vc : relative velocity in case of collision is able to be avoided at the time of a collision, a speed reduction rate is set to "1." 4. Allocation of marks(points) 32 points are assigned about AEBS (car to car) according to the accident reduction effect of the ASV technology based on the calculation made by government and points obtained from each test is multiplied by a weighting factor by scenario, function, and speed. The result which carried out approximation distribution is as follows. (Calculated the reduction effect by a system functioning in death and a serious injury accident. An alarm function and a control facility is 1:1) \13.00 \9.75 \6.50 \3.25 \ Ex:CCRs scenario Reduction effect Allocating remarks 4 点 3 点 2 点 1 点 Score points based on effect measure condition The reduction number of deaths and seriously injured per year The effect of reducing the social loss (Evaluation points) total 3, car to car 1, car to pedestrian 2, ~ Actual accident 危険認知速度 speed (km/h) (kph) For safety reason of test, 32 points are assigned instead of 33

13 13

14 14

15 Device features Device 15 Millimeter-wave Radar Laser Radar Camera Device of test vehicles Feature -detects the position of person or running vehicle, speed, and relative speed by irradiating a short wavelength radio wave -detection distance is relatively long -detect the distance to the obstacle based on the reflection from the device -detection distance is relatively short -detect obstacles by analyzing the images Device Manufacture Vehicle Suzuki Solio Toyota/Lexus Camry, Harrier, NX, IS Nissan Skyline Honda Odyssey Mitsubishi Outlander Millimeter-wave Radar Laser Radar 12. Current technology device Suzuki Daihatsu Spacia, Hustler, Wagon R Tanto, Mira e:s, Move Honda Fit,Vesel, N-BOX, N-WGN Single Nissan X-TRAIL, Note Camera compound Subaru Forester, LEVORG, Impreza Millimeter-wave +Camera Toyota/Lexus LS Laser+Millimeter wave Matsuda Axela, Atenza

16 13. LDWS test and evaluation test and evaluate the system of which the vehicle is going to deviate from the lane or carries out the alarm of having deviated to a driver, according to the actual accident condition in Japan etc., 1. Test methods Steer at constant speed (60km/h) along with red line and check whether system alarm issued in test area as the right Figure.(If the designed speed is higher than 60 km/h, it shall be tested the speed at 70 km/h) 3.5m Target locus 判定領域 Judge area 0.3m 0.75m 2. Allocation of remarks(points) If LDWS alert is confirmed, it obtains points according to the effect of reducing the social loss. 1 confirmed at 60km/h 8.0 points 2 confirmed at 70km/h 4.0 points 182.5m(60km/h 時 ) 206.0m(70km/h 時 ) 0.5m 1.5m 測定区間 Measurement area Score points based on effect measure 1.8m condition The reduction number of deaths and seriously injured per year The effect of reducing the social loss (Evaluation points) 100m 以上 total (more than 60km/h) (more 16 than 70km/h) 122 4

17 17

18 14. Advanced Safety Technology evaluation Evaluation methods allocating remarks by accident which becomes reducible with each system allocating remarks by accident reduction rate by each system Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEBS)=32 points Lane departure Warning System (LDWS) =8 points Grand total=40 points The logo mark given to the authorized vehicle Authorization as ASV ASV :If the total point is over 2 points ASV+ :if the points obtained is over 12 points 18

19 (for reference: how to view leaflet) Manufacture model Total score (AEBS+LDWS) AEBS Testing Range LDWS Standard equipped *Camera *Laser radar *Milliwave radar Optional equipped 19

20 15. Roadmap for Advanced Safety Technology Assessment AEBS LDWS Autonomous Emergency Braking System(car to car) Autonomous Emergency Braking System(car to pedestrian) Lane Departure Warning System Test starts Making of test methods and procedure Test starts Test starts Others Around View Monitor etc. Making of test methods and procedure Test starts

21 16. Future plan Aiming safer and relieved automotive society according to the Roadmap by making of concrete test methods and procedures Around view monitor and others Testing the around view monitor which provides image including an alarm function about all the Headings around aiming at prevention of the accident etc. which involve in the small child of a dead angle 2014 testing methods and procedure 2015 starts assessment Around view image 21

22 17. Conclusion 1 The promotion of NCAP is important in order to reduce traffic accident. 2 JNCAP has been playing a significant role in Japan. 3 For more safety, Assessment for Advanced safety technology has launched in Collaboration with NCAPs in the world is increasingly important. 5 NCAP could raise the safety consciousness of car user all over the world in the future.

23 Thank you very much khob khun krab