The Evolution of Side Crash Compatibility Between Cars, Light Trucks and Vans

Similar documents
The Emerging Risk of Fatal Motorcycle Crashes with Guardrails

STUDY OF AIRBAG EFFECTIVENESS IN HIGH SEVERITY FRONTAL CRASHES

Vehicle Safety Risk Assessment Project Overview and Initial Results James Hurnall, Angus Draheim, Wayne Dale Queensland Transport

OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCTION OF FATALITIES IN VEHICLE-GUARDRAIL COLLISIONS

Petition for Rulemaking; 49 CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Rear Impact Guards; Rear Impact Protection

CRASH ATTRIBUTES THAT INFLUENCE THE SEVERITY OF ROLLOVER CRASHES

THE ACCURACY OF WINSMASH DELTA-V ESTIMATES: THE INFLUENCE OF VEHICLE TYPE, STIFFNESS, AND IMPACT MODE

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Overview Data

SEVERITY MEASUREMENTS FOR ROLLOVER CRASHES

DOT HS April 2013

FAR SIDE IMPACT INJURY RISK FOR BELTED OCCUPANTS IN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES

Opportunities for Safety Innovations Based on Real World Crash Data

POLICY POSITION ON THE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION REGULATION

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

PROBLEMS WITH COMPARING VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY ISSUES IN US AND UK FLEETS. Jeya Padmanaban Mickael Delahaye JP Research, Inc.

Predicted availability of safety features on registered vehicles a 2015 update

DETC2000/DAC IMPROVED SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION: A SEARCH FOR SYSTEMS MODELING PRIORITIES

Rollovers of the future: strong roofs, ESC, and curtain airbags

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

Statement before the North Carolina House Select Committee. Motorcycle Helmet Laws. Stephen L. Oesch

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

ROAD SAFETY RESEARCH, POLICING AND EDUCATION CONFERENCE, NOV 2001

Crash Investigation Data in the United States October 2017

Crash Severity: A Comparison of Event Data Recorder Measurements with Accident Reconstruction Estimates

Using Injury Data to Understand Traffic and Vehicle Safety

Quick Facts General Statistics. Fatality Rate per 100,000 Population Source: FARS/Census

Enhancing School Bus Safety and Pupil Transportation Safety

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard

Use of Finite Element Analysis for the Prediction of Driver Fatality Ratio Based on Vehicle Intrusion Ratio in Head-On Collisions

First Do No Harm: Why Seatbelts are a Patient Care Issue. Noah Smith, NHTSA Office of EMS

The New Car Assessment Program: Suggested Approaches for Enhancements; Docket No. NHTSA

Only video reveals the hidden dangers of speeding.

Statement before the Transportation Subcommittee, U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Committee

Collect and analyze data on motorcycle crashes, injuries, and fatalities;

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

MEASUREMENTS OF VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY IN FRONT-TO-SIDE CRASHES K.

Understanding Traffic Data: How To Avoid Making the Wrong Turn

Balavich 1 INSTALLATION PATTERNS FOR EMERGING SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES

Optimizing Cross Boarder Truck Safety. Cross Boarder Regional Truck Transportation Conference. John Woodrooffe

2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update

Traffic Safety Facts. School-Transportation-Related Crashes Data. Overview. Person Type. Key Findings

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

The Sad History of Rollover Prevention 30 Years, Thousand of Deaths and Injuries, and Still No Safety Performance Standard

Effect of Subaru EyeSight on pedestrian-related bodily injury liability claim frequencies

Figure 15. Yearly Trend in Death Rates for Motor Vehicle Transport: NSW, Year

CRASH COMPATIBILITY: THE U.S. PERSPECTIVE. Brian O Neill, Adrian K. Lund, and Joseph M. Nolan Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

White Paper. Compartmentalization and the Motorcoach

EMBARGOED NEWS RELEASE

KANSAS Occupant Protection Observational Survey Supplementary Analyses Summer Study

Relevance of head injuries in side collisions in Germany Comparison with the analyses and proposals of the WG13

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

STUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

THE INFLUENCE OF TRENDS IN HEAVY VEHICLE TRAVEL ON ROAD TRAUMA IN THE LIGHT VEHICLE FLEET

Road fatalities in 2012

Driver Speed Compliance in Western Australia. Tony Radalj and Brian Kidd Main Roads Western Australia

The Truth About Light Trucks

DOT HS April Tire-Related Factors in the Pre-Crash Phase

The older driver crash picture: trends and factors

Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017

A MODEL FOR CONSIDERING THE TOTAL SAFETY OF THE LIGHT PASSENGER VEHICLE FLEET. by Stuart Newstead Amanda Delaney Linda Watson Max Cameron

Lives Saved through Vehicle Design: Regulation, Consumer Information and the Future

John M. Sullivan. Truck Talk Truck Talk May 19, 2010

Large Trucks. Trends. About 1 in 10 highway deaths occurs in a crash involving a large truck.

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Research Note. DOT HS October 2017

CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALL OVERLAP CRASHES

Statement before Massachusetts Auto Damage Appraiser Licensing Board. Institute Research on Cosmetic Crash Parts. Stephen L. Oesch.

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

Traffic Research & Data Center

D1.3 FINAL REPORT (WORKPACKAGE SUMMARY REPORT)

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

New belt geometries in rear seat from a comfort, handling and safety perspective

EVALUATION OF VEHICLE-BASED CRASH SEVERITY METRICS USING EVENT DATA RECORDERS

An Evaluation of the Relationship between the Seat Belt Usage Rates of Front Seat Occupants and Their Drivers

NEW CRASH TESTS: SMALL CARS IMPROVE AND THE TOP PERFORMERS ALSO ARE FUEL SIPPERS

Road Safety Status of AEC Countries

Pole Side Impact GTR: Assessment of Safety Need: Updated Data Collection

Design Evaluation of Fuel Tank & Chassis Frame for Rear Impact of Toyota Yaris

STUDIES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IGNITION INTERLOCKS

MAC Refrigerant Blend Cooperative Research Program --- Update --- Enrique Peral-AntĂșnez, RENAULT [ Chair person ]

--- SA. Research Note -.,; People Saving People Injuries Associated With Hazards Involving ~ Motor Vehicle "Rollaways"

Electric vehicles a one-size-fits-all solution for emission reduction from transportation?

Remote Combination Adaptive Driving Equipment Investigation Dynamic Science, Inc. (DSI), Case Number G 1990 Ford Bronco Arizona October

Frontal Corner Impacts Crash Tests and Real-World Experience

The Weak Impact Of New NHTSA Side-Impact Standards

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

Compliance Test Results. of Independently Manufactured. Automotive Replacement Headlamps. to FMVSS 108. Study I. March 18, 2003

Comparison of the 6YO ATD kinematics restrained in Booster CRSs Sled Experiments in frontal, oblique and side impacts

Comparison of HVE simulations to NHTSA full-frontal barrier testing: an analysis of 3D and 2D stiffness coefficients in SIMON and EDSMAC4

TRENDS IN AUSTRALIAN VEHICLE CRASHWORTHINESS BY YEAR OF VEHICLE MANUFACTURE WITHIN VEHICLE MARKET GROUPS

NHTSA SIDE IMPACT RESEARCH: MOTIVATION FOR UPGRADED TEST PROCEDURES

VOLKSWAGEN. Volkswagen Safety Features

AIRBAG: IS IT AN EFFECTIVE OCCUPANT PROTECTION SYSTEM?

Priorities for future vehicle safety improvements in the Western Australian light vehicle fleet

July 13, Reforming the Automobile Fuel Economy Standards Program Docket No. NHTSA , Notice 1

There have been airbag-like devices for aeroplanes as early as the 1940s, with the first patents filed in the 1950s.

Injury Risk Posed by Side Impact of Nontracking Vehicles into Guardrails

Bigger Trucks and Smaller Cars

Insurance Data and the Cost of Crashing

Transcription:

2003-01-0899 The Evolution of Side Crash Compatibility Between Cars, Light Trucks and Vans Hampton C. Gabler Rowan University Copyright 2003 SAE International ABSTRACT Several research studies have concluded that light trucks and vans (LTVs) are incompatible with cars in traffic collisions. These studies have noted that crash incompatibility is most severe in side crashes. These early research efforts however were conducted before complete introduction of crash injury countermeasures such as dynamic side impact protection. Based upon U.S. traffic accident statistics, this paper investigates the side crash compatibility of late model cars, light trucks and vans equipped with countermeasures designed specifically to provide side crash protection. The paper explores both LTV-to-car crash compatibility and crash incompatibility in car-to-car collisions. INTRODUCTION The compatibility of a vehicle is a combination of its crashworthiness and its aggressivity when involved in crashes with other members of the vehicle fleet. While crashworthiness focuses on the capability of a vehicle to protect its occupants in a collision, aggressivity is measured in terms of the casualties to occupants of the other vehicle involved in the collision. Crashworthiness is sometimes referred to as self-protection while reduction in aggressivity is sometimes referred to as partner-protection. [Zobel, 1998] Several research studies have concluded that light trucks and vans (LTVs) are incompatible with cars in traffic collisions [Gabler and Hollowell, 1998, IIHS, 1998, Joksch, 1998]. These studies have noted that crash incompatibility is particularly severe in side crashes. These early research efforts however were conducted before the complete introduction of crash injury countermeasures such as airbags and dynamic side impact protection mandated by FMVSS 214 beginning in 1994 and fully implemented in 1997. The purpose of this paper is to re-evaluate the side crash compatibility of late model cars, light trucks and vans equipped with countermeasures designed specifically to provide side crash protection. In the year 2000, over 9000 occupants of passenger vehicles in the U.S. were fatally injured when side struck in traffic collisions. As shown in Figure 1, over 7200 of these fatalities were car occupants while 2300 of the fatally injured were the occupants of light trucks and vans (LTVs). Side Impact Fatalities 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Year Car Occupants LTV Occupants Figure 1. U.S. Side Impact Fatalities 1991-2000 Figure 2 examines fatalities resulting from side impact in two-vehicle collisions from 1991-2001. Despite only comprising about one-third of the passenger fleet, striking LTVs accounted for the majority of side impact fatalities. In the year 2001, 4442 side struck occupants of either cars or LTVs died in collisions with other cars and LTVs. Over 62 percent of these fatalities occurred when the striking vehicle was an LTV. In the U.S., the LTV population is a growing segment of the registered passenger vehicle fleet. This demographic trend is reflected in Figure 2 as a declining number of fatalities in car-to-car crashes and a growing number of LTV-to-car and LTV-to-LTV fatalities.

Side Struck Vehicle Fatalities 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 LTV-to-Car Car-to-LTV LTV-to-LTV Reduced Aggressivity. In the late 1990s, several automakers began to voluntarily introduce LTV models with improved crash compatibility. Improvements in partner protection included lowered frame rails and underframe structural bars. These structural changes were designed to better engage the side and frontal structures of cars, and lead to a more uniform sharing of crash energy in a collision. OBJECTIVE 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Year Figure 2. U.S. Side Impact Fatalities in Two Vehicle collisions - 1991-2001 There are two strategies to improve side crash compatibility: (1) improve the crashworthiness of the struck car can be improved (self-protection) and (2) reduce the aggressivity of the striking vehicle can be reduced (partner protection). Since the first studies of car-ltv compatibility were completed in 1996 and 1998, both of these strategies have been pursued to varying degrees. Improved Side Crashworthiness. During the early 1990s, significant improvements were made to side impact crashworthiness as a result of a major upgrade to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 214. In 1990 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) modified FMVSS 214 to require dynamic side impact protection for passenger cars in the United States. Phase-in of FMVSS 214 began for model year 1994 cars with complete implementation for all cars beginning in model year 1997. All light trucks under 6000 pounds Gross Vehicle Weight were required to comply with the regulation starting in model year 1999. To meet this requirement, automakers introduced vehicles with a number of innovative side impact countermeasures including improvements to side structure integrity, door padding, and, most recently, side door airbags and inflatable head restraints. A study by Vander Lugt et al (1999) has shown that FMVSS 214 has led to enhanced side impact protection for passenger car occupants. Side Impact Protection and Frontal Airbags. Also, during this period, frontal airbags became mandatory for both cars and LTVs. Frontal airbags are, of course, designed primarily to provide occupant protection in frontal impacts. However, frontal airbags may also reduce occupant protection in those side crashes where there is a significant longitudinal component of acceleration, e.g. angled side impacts. The goal of this paper is to determine the evolution of side crash compatibility of cars and LTVs in the current U.S. fleet. This paper will compare and contrast the selfprotection provided by these enhancements both before and after full implementation of the dynamic side impact protection standard. The paper will also evaluate vehicle aggressivity over the same period to determine the status of improved partner-protection strategies in the fleet. APPROACH Our approach will be to compare the side crash compatibility of cars designed before and after the dynamic side impact protection enhancement required by FMVSS No. 214. To perform this comparison, our study divides the span of model years into three groups: 1980-89 (pre-214), 1990-96 (transition period), and 1997-2001 (full FMVSS 214 certification). Vehicles manufactured before 1980 were excluded from this grouping. To reflect the phase-in of FMVSS 214 from 1994-96 and the likelihood that many manufacturers began early enhancement of side impact protection in anticipation of FMVSS 214 implementation, this study assumes that a mix of pre-214 and post-214 compliant cars were introduced into the fleet during a seven-year transition period from 1990-96. The analysis was based upon the 1997-2001 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the 1997-2001 NASS General Estimates System (GES). Occupant fatality counts were obtained from FARS. FARS is a comprehensive census of all traffic related fatalities in the U.S. GES was analyzed to determine the number of occupants who were involved - both fatally and nonfatally - in side impacts. GES is a comprehensive database containing information on approximately 60,000 randomly sampled police reported accidents each year. Cases from GES are assigned weights that can be used to estimate the number of similar accidents that may have taken place that year that were not sampled. Because GES is a sample of police reported accidents, it is important to note that these estimates could be subject to sampling errors [NHTSA, 1999] For the purposes of this study, only side impacts involving two vehicles were analyzed. Only cases in which both vehicles were either a car or an LTV were included. To avoid the issue of occupancy rate differences between different types of vehicles, only

driver fatalities are considered as presumably all vehicles have a single driver. For GES, side impacts were defined to be either IMPACT =2 or 3 (left or right side impact point) and the striking vehicle IMPACT = 01, 11, or 12. For FARS, left side impacts were defined to be cases in which the first harmful event was equal to be 8, 9, or 10 o clock. Right side impacts in FARS were defined to be those cases in which the first harmful event was equal to be 2, 3, or 4 o clock. Striking vehicle impact point in FARS was required to be 11, 12, or 1 o clock. First harmful event was used in FARS to be consistent with the GES IMPACT field which indicates the zone of impact corresponding to the first harmful event. RESULTS THE EVOLUTION OF FATALITY RATIOS The ratio of striking-to-struck driver fatalities resulting from left side impacts is presented in Figure 3 as a function of the model year of the struck car. For crashes in which the struck car is of model year 1980-89 and the striking vehicle was a car from the current fleet, 12 drivers died in the struck car for every driver killed in the striking car. On the other hand, if the struck car was of model year 1997-2001 and certified to FMVSS 214, there were 7 drivers died in the struck car for every driver killed in the striking car. This indicates a significant improvement in side crash compatibility. Struck Car Struck Car Model Year 1980-89 Model Year 1997-2001 (pre-fmvss 214) (Certified to FMVSS 214) Figure 3. Fatality Ratios as a function of struck car model year (FARS 1997-2001) For every driver who dies in a striking LTV, 43 sidestruck car drivers are fatally injured when the struck car is of model year 1980-89. By contrast, if the struck car is of model year 1997-2001, for every fatally injured driver of a striking LTV, only 17 side-struck car drivers are killed. As noted in other studies, the drivers of passenger cars disproportionately shoulder the fatality toll in car-ltv frontal crashes. However, it can be seen that as with car-to-car side crashes, there has been a significant improvement in side crash compatibility in collisions between LTVs and cars. Because fatality ratios are computed by dividing struck car fatalities by striking car fatalities, they are a composite of the striking car crashworthiness, the striking car aggressivity, and the struck car crashworthiness. Although frequently quoted in compatibility papers, fatality ratios are not the ideal measurement of either struck car crashworthiness or striking car aggressivity. For example, a high fatality ratio can be the result of either an aggressive striking vehicle or the result of a striking vehicle with superior crashworthiness (if there are no deaths in the striking vehicle, the fatality ratio is infinite). This paper has provided fatality ratios for comparison with the research results of other studies. A much better measure of compatibility is the probability of fatality. The probability of fatality as presented below is defined as the number of struck driver deaths divided by the number of police-reported left side impacts. This metric directly measures either side impact crashworthiness or side impact aggressivity as discussed below. EVOLUTION OF SIDE IMPACT CRASHWORTHINESS The first goal of this study was to determine how the side impact crashworthiness of cars has evolved from model year 1980 to the present when struck by LTVs. Struck vehicles were broken down by model year into 1980-89 (pre-fmvss 214), 1990-96 (transition period), and 1997-2001 (full FMVSS 214 certification) groups. The crash performance of vehicles from each period was determined through analysis of all side impacts occurring using the current fleet. Only cases in which the striking vehicle was either a car or LTV were included. To maintain a sufficiently large sample for analysis, no restriction was placed upon striking vehicle model year. This approach provides an assessment of the crashworthiness of vehicles in each model year category when subjected to side impacts with the current fleet. Assuming that all vehicles are exposed to the same mix of striking vehicles, this approach allows the comparison of side impact crashworthiness for each of the three model year categories. As shown in Figure 4, the side impact crashworthiness of cars of model year 1997-2001 was significantly improved over the crashworthiness of cars of model years 1980-89. This observation was noted both for all LTV striking body types and when the striking vehicle was a passenger car. In all cases, the probability of driver fatality in left side impacts dropped by approximately half for cars certified to the FMVSS 214 standard. It should be noted that, as airbags were introduced to the car fleet during this time period, some

of this improvement is in all likelihood due to this countermeasure as well. Large Van-to-Car Large Utility-to-Car Standard Pickup-to-Car Compact Utility-to-Car Compact Pickup-to-Car Minivan-to-Car 2.1 1.2 3.4 5.7 5.5 6.1 7.4 8.3 8.4 12.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 12.7 14.7 15.9 20.2 Struck MY 1980-89 Struck MY 1997-2002 Struck Driver Fatalities per 1000 Police-Reported Side Impacts Figure 4. Side Impact Crashworthiness vs. Model Year (GES/FARS 1997-2001) EVOLUTION OF SIDE IMPACT AGGRESSIVITY The second goal of this study was to determine how the aggressivity of LTVs has evolved from model year 1980 to the present. Striking vehicles were broken down by model year into 1980-89 (pre-214), 1990-96 (transition period), and 1997-2001 (full FMVSS 214 certification) groups. The aggressivity of vehicles from each model year group was determined by examining side impacts in which these vehicles side struck a passenger vehicle of the current fleet. Only cases in which both the striking and struck vehicle were either a car or an LTV were included. To maintain a sufficiently large sample for analysis, no restriction was placed upon struck vehicle model year. This approach provides an assessment of the aggressivity of vehicles in each model year category in side impacts with the current fleet. Assuming that all striking vehicles collide with the same mix of struck vehicles, this approach allows the comparison of side impact aggressivity for each of the three model year categories. Pickup-to-Car SUV-to-Car Van-to-Car 1.68 1.75 5.37 6.06 5.88 5.95 7.51 10.14 Striking MY 1980-89 Striking MY 1997-2001 As shown in the Figure 5, the aggressivity of LTVs when side impacting a car actually increased when LTVs of the 1980-89 vintage are compared with the more recent 1997-2001 models. This figure indicates that a driver of a car was significantly more likely to be fatally injured when struck by a 1997-2001 LTV model than when struck by a 1980-89 model LTV. This observation may be due to the increase in weight of late model LTVs over LTVs of ten years ago, and the growth in the SUV market which our earlier work (Gabler and Hollowell, 2000) noted to be particularly incompatible with cars in side crashes. It has been suggested that efforts to improve side crash compatibility should focus on improving side crash compatibility. This analysis has shown that although side impact injury countermeasures have been significantly improved between the 1980 s and the late 1990 s, vehicle aggressivity increased during this same time period nullifying, to some degree, the benefits of improved crashworthiness. LIMITATIONS This paper has presented an analysis which shows that the number of driver fatalities per police-reported left side impact dropped by approximately half for cars certified to the FMVSS 214 standard. This finding however should not be viewed as an evaluation of FMVSS 214 effectiveness. During the 1997-2001 time period, airbags were standard equipment in all passenger cars. During the 1980-89 time period however, airbags were not standard equipment in cars. The improvement in side crashworthiness reported in this paper is in all likelihood due to the combination of frontal airbags and dynamic side impact protection. Our approach is limited to showing only the combined effectiveness of these countermeasures and does not provide a measure of each countermeasure separately. Our approach has tracked the evolution of side crash compatibility by comparing self-protection and partnerprotection for a sequence of three distinct model year time intervals. Implicit in our approach has been the assumption that each of the three groups was subjected to the same traffic crash environment over the time period of interest. All three groups were assumed to have experienced the same delta-v, impact angle, and collision partner distribution. Likewise, the distribution of driver age, and hence injury tolerance, was assumed to be the same for all three groups. An improved approach would be to explicitly compute these distributions where possible and correct for any deviations from the assumption of a shared traffic crash environment. 0 2 4 6 8 10 Struck Driver Fatalities per 1000 Police-Reported Crashes 12 CONCLUSION Figure 5. Side Impact Aggressivity vs. Model Year (GES/FARS 1997-2001) This paper has investigated side crash compatibility for passenger cars designed to provide enhanced side crash safety. For this study, enhanced side crash safety

was indicated by compliance with FMVSS No. 214. Our analysis was based upon the coupled analysis of 1997-2001 FARS and 1997-2001 NASS/GESS accident databases. Our findings include: Side impact crashworthiness in cars of model year 1997-2001 was found to be significantly better than the side impact crashworthiness of cars of model years 1980-89. This improvement in crashworthiness was noted when these vehicles were struck by cars and every class of LTV. For this comparison, both sets of cars were subjected to the side impacts from the same group of vehicles, i.e. the striking vehicle mix of the current fleet. The side impact aggressivity of LTVs of model year 1997-2001 was noted to be significantly worse than the side impact aggressivity of LTVs of model years 1980-89. The side impact aggressivity of striking cars was noted to be approximately constant over this same time period. REFERENCES 1. Gabler, H.C. and Hollowell, W.T., The Aggressivity of Light Trucks and Vans in Traffic Crashes, SAE Transactions, Journal of Passenger Cars, Section 6, v.107, Paper No. 980908 (1998) Vehicle Type, Weight Affect Outcomes, Status Report Vol. 33, No. 1. 3. Joksch, H., Massie, D., and Pichler, R., (February 1998) Vehicle Aggressivity: Fleet Characterization Using Traffic Collision Data, DOT HS 808 679, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. 4. Kahane, C. J., Evaluation of FMVSS 214 - Side Impact Protection: Dynamic Performance Requirement NHTSA Report Number DOT HS 809 004, October 1999. 5. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) General Estimates System (GES) Analytical Users Manual, 1999. U.S. Department of Transportation. National Accident Sampling System. 6. Vander Lugt, D., Connolly, T, and Bhalsod, D., Vehicle Compatibility Analysis of the Factors Influencing Side Impact Occupant Injury, SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0067 (1999) 7. Zobel, R., Demands for Compatibility of Passenger Vehicles, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Enhanced Safety Vehicles, Windsor, Canada. (June 1998) 2. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) (February 14, 1998) Crash Compatibility: How