Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

Similar documents
SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Design Endorsement for Sterling Boulevard Extension

Designation of a Community Safety Zone in Honey Harbour in the Township of Georgian Bay

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

Bus Stop Optimization Study

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Driveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards

Project Status Update January 2017

Transportation Committee Revised Project Scope and Cost Estimate. November 23, 2015

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Alberta Electric System Operator Saleski Transmission Project Needs Identification Document

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

MAR1011. West Birmingham Bus Network Review March 2010

MOTION NO. M Preferred Alternative for the Puyallup Station Access Improvement Project

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management System Lessons Learned. June 2, 2014

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

MAP OR PHOTO. Public Meeting & Open House July 23, Project Roadway Limits From: FM 1957 To: FM 471. Counties Bexar & Medina

City of Grand Forks Staff Report

Request for Qualification for Comprehensive Plan Services RFQ#

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM. TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Rapid Transit. Date: May 24, Summary

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Appendix C. 5% Design Plan and Profile Drawings/ Additional Design Information. South Oak Cliff Corridor Blue Line Extension

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

NOTICE OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED BOARD MEETINGS

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

McArthur Avenue Cycling Lanes (between St. Laurent Boulevard and North River Road)

AGENDA INTERCITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION January 20, :30 P.M. 1) APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1 min.

SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L82

METRO CNG Program Phase I Update. Customer Service Committee April 2014

Public Information Workshop

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

Update on Bus Stop Enhancements

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Request for Statements of Qualification Gardnerville Station (Eagle Gas Station Redevelopment Project) 1395 Highway 395 N Gardnerville, NV

CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE

Business Advisory Committee. November 3, 2015

Dockless Shared Mobility Recommendation

Re: 233 Armstrong Street Residential Condominium Traffic Brief

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

S.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

DATE: March 21, 2017 REPORT NO. PW TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ] 2.0 TOPIC

Scope of Services January 26, Project Development and Conceptual Engineering for City of Lake Forest Amtrak Station

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Information Meeting Transfer Station Options. September 30, 2014

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

Travel Action Plan De Montfort University

MetroExpress Improvements

Dockless Micromobility Regulatory Framework

DRAFT Subject to modifications

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

E) That the General Manager be authorized to execute and deliver such documentation on behalf of the Park Board.

Internal Audit Report. Fuel Consumption Oversight and Coordination TxDOT Internal Audit Division

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

Mobility 2045 Plan Workshop

Welcome. Please Sign In

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Construction Staging Area 4 Avenue Road

Testimony for House Bill No. 2040

Transcription:

Project Manager Ed Collins LJA Engineering, Inc. Transportation Planning Manager 5316 Highway 290 West Austin Public Infrastructure Group Austin, TX 78735 (512) 762-6301 cell (512) 439-4757 office CARTS Urban Terminal, Phase 2 PHASE 2 FINAL REPORT March 2, 2017 Project Scope: Phase 2 coordination and facilitation with governmental entities in the development of a triangular site of approximately one (1) acre bounded by 5th Street, Shady Lane and Cesar Chavez Street in Austin, Texas for construction of a new location urban terminal. The site will assume passenger station operations currently performed at CARTS Austin headquarters located at 2010 E. 6th Street. General Work Description: Coordination and facilitation with Texas Department of Transportation s (TxDOT) Austin District and appropriate TxDOT headquarters staff to obtain final approvals for use of the site as a public transportation facility. Includes research of similar TxDOT arrangements with public transit providers for use of State of Texas rights-of-way. Continued coordination and facilitation with Capital Metro staff to obtain detailed information and documentation regarding joint use of the site (i.e., general requirements for Capital Metro buses to access site). Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site. Provide facilitation services between CARTS and neighborhood leadership to discuss the project for compatibility with the neighborhood plan. Preparation of exhibits depicting conceptual layout of urban terminal for use in stakeholder meetings. Coordination/Facilitation Summary: Based on meetings (in-person and via telephone) and email correspondence, the involved entities TxDOT, City of Austin and Capital Metro support CARTS conceptual site plan and TxDOT is in the process of finalizing a Multiple Use Agreement (MUA) for CARTS use of the site. Capital Metro s Planning & Development Department expressed interest to jointly use the proposed urban terminal for its passenger transfer operations and to interface with CARTS services as the urban terminal site is on routes outlined in Capital Metro s recently adopted Connections 2025 Service Plan. The City of Austin s Transportation Department provided guidance in the development of the conceptual site plan and continues to offer assistance as CARTS begins the City s project development process. City of Austin Planning staff also provided general direction for discussions with neighborhood leadership about the benefits of the proposed project. CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report

Recommended Next Steps: Continued coordination with TxDOT to ensure the Multiple Use Agreement is finalized in late March/early April 2017 Perform land/property survey of site Perform appropriate Federal environmental study (potential for Categorical Exclusion) As outlined in the Phase 1 report, file with the City of Austin s Development Services Department a Development Assessment Application (see Appendix D) for City staff to circulate to other departments for comment and guidance on City requirements for developing the site Formalize process and communications with City of Austin s Transportation and Planning Departments and Capital Metro regarding support for the urban terminal for use in the City development processes Begin robust outreach to appropriate City Council members, the Council s Transportation Committee, appropriate City commissions (Urban Transportation, Planning), neighborhood representatives and CAMPO for support of the project Research and develop appropriate solicitation mechanisms (Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, Pre-development-Design-Build) leading to the construction of the urban terminal CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report 2

LJA Engineering Major Product Delivery: Conceptual Site Plan A draft conceptual site plan was developed by sub-consultant McCann Adams Studio for use in discussions with the TxDOT, City of Austin and Capital Metro. Please see the rendering below. The use of this visual provided a tool for gaining input from the entities. Considerations in Design of Draft Conceptual Site Plan Through consultation with CARTS General Manager sub-consultant McCann Adams Studio developed a rough draft site plan (see Figure 1 below) to include the following elements for the facility: Accommodate 7 to 8 buses Passenger station able to provide shelter for customers waiting for bus with restrooms and office space for CARTS personnel Accommodation of passenger dropoff/kiss-and-ride, Car-share space, bicycle racks and parking for CARTS personnel manning the passenger station Accommodate on-site water detention as required by City of Austin FIGURE 1: CARTS Urban Terminal Draft Conceptual Site Plan CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report 3

Refinements to Conceptual Site Plan Based on collaboration between the consult team and CARTS General Manager and CARTS staff and a subsequent meeting with City of Austin staff from the Transportation Department and Planning Department, the draft site plan was modified to remove the direct eastbound bus driveway to E. Cesar Chavez Street and a traffic signal was added at the intersection of E. Cesar Chavez and Shady Lane. Additionally, City of Austin s Transportation Department Assistant Director recommended a bus actuated traffic signal loop to permit buses to depart the site to enter E. Cesar Chavez. Based on the recommendations, the refined conceptual site plan was developed (see Figure 2). The conceptual site plan includes: Entrance to site s circular bus-only driveway from Shady Lane and exit to E. Cesar Chavez Street via new traffic signal Eight bus bays capable for 40 buses Passenger terminal (will include restrooms and offices) with extended porch for passengers to have cover from inclement weather Circular driveway to passenger terminal for drop-offs/kiss-and-ride, including four parking spaces Two locations for potential bio-filtration meadows Significant tree-scape throughout the site Reconfiguration of E. 5 th Street to close the existing eastbound ramp to E. Cesar Chavez Street New on-street parking on westbound E. 5 th Street from E. Cesar Chavez Street to Shady Lane CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report 4

LJA Engineering FIGURE 2: CARTS Urban Terminal Refined Conceptual Site Plan (Dave - I m having trouble in getting the image to copy from the PDF but I m working on it.) CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report 5

Coordination Highlights: Key City of Austin Communication/Coordination November 9, 2017 meeting with City of Austin Staff: LJA Engineering and McCann Adams Studio representatives met with Transportation Department s Assistant Director Gordon Derr, Area Engineer Anna Martin and Planning Department s Tonya Swartzenruber where the draft conceptual site plan was presented. Also presented was a two-page report which depicted TxDOT s 2010 and 2015 urban saturation traffic counts for roadways adjacent and in close proximity to the urban terminal site (see Exhibit A). City staff: recommended: o Recommended removing the direct eastbound bus driveway to E. Cesar Chavez Street o Recommended adding a traffic signal at the intersection of E. Cesar Chavez and Shady Lane to facilitate safe movement of buses leaving urban terminal site. City of Austin s Transportation Department Assistant Director recommended a bus actuated traffic signal loop to permit buses to depart the site to enter E. Cesar Chavez Street o Supportive of eliminating eastbound E. 5 th Street ramp to eastbound E. Cesar Chavez due to decreasing traffic movements and low traffic volume counts indicated through TxDOT 2010 and 2015 urban saturation traffic counts o o Supportive of adding parking on E. 5 th Street Supportive of overall site concept and will assist CARTS as the project moves through the City s development processes Key TxDOT Communications/Coordination September 14, 2016: Follow up discussion with Lori Wagner, TxDOT Austin District s Permits Coordinator on CARTS Board of Director Resolution authorizing entering into a Multiple Use Agreement (MUA) (see Exhibit B) with TxDOT. Ms. Wagner indicated that a site plan would be needed prior to drafting the MUA. December 23 December 28, 2016: Email exchange with TxDOT Area Engineer Michael McKissick providing CARTS Board resolution, site map, conceptual site plan and 2010 and 2015 urban saturation traffic counts. Mr. McKissick indicates he does not have any concerns with the conceptual site plan but requests a follow up with John Nevares, Austin District s Transportation Operations Assistant Director on the proposed traffic signal. January 9, 2017: Telephone discussion and email from Mr. Nevares forwarding staff comments that there are no issues regarding the development of the site and that CARTS will need to coordinate with the City of Austin on the proposed traffic signal. January 25, 2017: Forward Mr. McKissick and Mr. Nevares emails to Ms. Wagner for further coordination on the development of the MUA February 28, 2017: Phone call from Ms. Wagner indicating that she has all the information she needs to begin the MUA. She indicates it will take 30 days to finalize the MUA. CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report 6

Key Capital Metro Communications/Coordination January 18, 2017: Met with Todd Hemingson, Capital Metro s Vice President of Strategic Planning & Development to present conceptual site plan. Mr. Hemingson expressed interest to jointly use the proposed urban terminal for Capital Metro s passenger transfer operations and to interface with CARTS services as the urban terminal site is on routes outlined in Capital Metro s recently adopted Connections 2025 service plan. Mr. Hemingson indicates Capital Metro will support CARTS as the urban terminal project goes through the City of Austin s development processes. Mr. Hemingson also indicates that there is a potential for some limited cost participation in the project. Periodic Project Status Reports Appendix C provides copies of emails that were sent to CARTS General Manager detailing progress of coordination activities throughout the duration of the Phase 2 effort. Appendices Appendix A Figures and Exhibits Figure 1 - CARTS Urban Terminal Draft Conceptual Site Plan Figure 2 - CARTS Urban Terminal Refined Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit A - Location of Proposed Site for Urban Terminal Exhibit B - Refined Conceptual Site Plan and Cross Sections Exhibit C - TxDOT 2010 and 2015 Urban Saturation Traffic Counts Exhibit D - CARTS Board of Directors MUA Resolution (adopted July 28, 2016) Appendix B Key Mails Regarding Discussions with TxDOT and City of Austin Appendix C Emails Containing Periodic Progress Reports Appendix D City of Austin Development Assessment & Alternative Equivalent Compliance Document CARTS Urban Terminal Investigation Phase 2 Final Report 7