Operational Planning Study Report. RTA to BCH transfer limit updates For Kitimat 4 Capacitor Banks

Similar documents
XXXXX. Kokish River Hydroelectric Project. Interconnection Facilities Study and Project Plan

BC HYDRO T&D SYSTEM OPERATIONS SYSTEM OPERATING ORDER 7T 30. NORTH COAST INTERCONNECTION Supersedes 7T-30 issued 07 June 2018

XXXX. Knob Hill Wind Farm Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

XXXX. Kokish River Hydroelectric Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

Interconnection Feasibility Study

Expected Energy Not Served (EENS) Study for Vancouver Island Transmission Reinforcement Project (Part I: Reliability Improvements due to VITR)

XXXX. Skookum Creek Power Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

THE NECESSITY OF THE 500 KV SYSTEM IN NWE S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE TO MONTANA CUSTOMERS

BC Hydro System 2017 Annual Progress Report

Generator Interconnection Facilities Study For SCE&G Two Combustion Turbine Generators at Hagood

Interconnection System Impact Study

Final Draft Report. Assessment Summary. Hydro One Networks Inc. Longlac TS: Refurbish 115/44 kv, 25/33/ General Description

Conifex Mackenzie Combined Heat and Power Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

Updated Transmission Expansion Plan for the Puget Sound Area to Support Winter South-to-North Transfers

Sunmine Solar Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

Feasibility Study for the Q MW Solar Project

TERRACE TO KITIMAT TRANSMISSION PROJECT OPEN HOUSE 5 P.M. 8 P.M. GDS14-027

ISO Rules Part 500 Facilities Division 502 Technical Requirements Section Interconnected Electric System Protection Requirements

BC Hydro System 2016 Annual Progress Report

Feasibility Study Report

Project #148. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT MULTIPLE CONTINGENCY EVENT IN NORTH WEST TASMANIA ON 6 APRIL 2012

PID 274 Feasibility Study Report 13.7 MW Distribution Inter-Connection Buras Substation

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT LIGHTNING STRIKES IN TASMANIA AND PACIFIC ALUMINIUM POTLINE LOAD REDUCTIONS 21 MARCH 2013

METRO NORTH TRANSMISSION STUDY ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILES (VILLAGE OF ANMORE)

Relative Power Factor Correction costs

XXXX. Crowsnest Pass Waste Heat Project. Interconnection System Impact Study

Facilities Study for Alberta to US Available Transfer Capability

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) FACILITIES STUDY FOR PROPOSED HVDC TERMINAL INTERCONNECTION AT NEW ARTESIA 345 KV BUS

Feasibility Study for the Q MW Solar Project

Stability Study for the Mt. Olive Hartburg 500 kv Line

i-pcgrid Workshop 2017

Interconnection System Impact Study

POWER SYSTEM INCIDENT REPORT: TRIP OF NO 1 AND 2 NEW OSBORNE 66 KV BUSBARS ON 26 SEPTEMBER 2010

TERRACE TO KITIMAT TRANSMISSION (TKT)

DETOUR GOLD CORPORATION SYSTEM IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DETOUR LAKE PROJECT

Feasibility Study Report

Gateway South Transmission Project

BC HYDRO REAL TIME OPERATIONS SYSTEM OPERATING ORDER 7T-35. PEACE 138/230 kv NETWORK OPERATION Supersedes 7T-35 issued 15 June 2017

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT TRIP OF 220 KV C BUSBAR AT GORDON POWER STATION ON 26 NOVEMBER 2011

Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI

Guide. Services Document No: GD-1401 v1.0. Issue Date: Title: WIND ISLANDING. Previous Date: N/A. Author: Heather Andrew.

CONNECTION ASSESSMENT & APPROVAL PROCESS. Cardinal Substation Modification of 115kV Substation

BC HYDRO REAL TIME OPERATIONS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SYSTEM OPERATING ORDER 7T-13

Project #94. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report Revision

100 MW Wind Generation Project

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT TRIP OF B 220 KV BUSBAR AT GEORGE TOWN ON 27 NOVEMBER 2012.

Generation Interconnection Impact Study Results for Eurus Energy America Corporation s Eurus Combine Hills I, LLC Power Project.

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT: TRIP OF 837 TARONG MT. ENGLAND 275 KV LINE AND MT. ENGLAND NO KV BUSBAR ON 30 OCTOBER 2011

Evaluation of the Performance of Back-to-Back HVDC Converter and Variable Frequency Transformer for Power Flow Control in a Weak Interconnection

SUMMARY OF REPORT TO ENERGIAVIRASTO SEPTEMBER Study on the amount of peak load capacity for

Impact of Distributed Energy Resources on Transmission System Reliability

Consulting Agreement Study. Completed for Transmission Customer

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2016 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting

SSF Section Location of Change SSF Issue Change(s) Comments Chapter Part B All Multiple Formatting, spelling and minor Changes applied -

Islanding of 24-bus IEEE Reliability Test System

Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For

Guideline for Parallel Grid Exit Point Connection 28/10/2010

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT SIMULTANEOUS TRIP OF 5A6 MT PIPER BANNABY 500 KV LINE AND MT PIPER NO. 2 UNIT ON 9 FEBRUARY 2012

Dynamic Scheduling NI A F S NI S. Where:

Transmission Competitive Solicitation Questions Log Question / Answer Matrix Harry Allen to Eldorado 2015

FIRSTENERGY S PROPOSED SOLUTION AND REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION DESIGNATION

El PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY 2014 BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR YEARS

Shunt Capacitor Bank Protection in UHV Pilot Project. Qing Tian

Midway/Monument Area TTC Study

Q217 Generator Interconnection Project

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT TRIPS OF YALLOURN W POWER STATION UNITS W1 AND W3 ON 14 NOVEMBER 2012

i-pcgrid Workshop 2018

The Evolution of System Protection Schemes for the Sarawak Power System By Victor Wong Sarawak Energy Berhad Presented at PQSynergy 2012, Sarawak

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado

Islanding of 24-bus IEEE Reliability Test System

CUSTOMER/ TWIN ARROWS PROJECT

Introduction to PowerWorld Simulator: Interface and Common Tools

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-369-FEAS-R1

NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR HYDRO GULL ISLAND TO SOLDIERS POND HVDC INTERCONNECTION DC SYSTEM STUDIES VOLUME 1

Contingency Analysis

Supplemental Report on the NCTPC Collaborative Transmission Plan

Rogers Road to Clubhouse 230kV New Transmission Line April 1, 2016

Reasonableness Test RT 015 /11 Salisbury Substation 11kV Feeders

New 115 kv Disconnect Switches at Bloomsburg MTS

Feasibility Study Report

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY EC300W ERIS FINAL REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

Dynamic Reactive Power Control for Wind Power Plants

Technologies & Economics

Emerald Reactive Support Alternative Solution Expressions of interest

Elbert County 500 MW Generation Addition Interconnection Feasibility Study Report OASIS POSTING # GI

PES Cook Islands KEMA Grid Study Final Report

Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (RAV-4SD) Docket No Witness: Rick A. Vail BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: AESO Project # 1674

NorthernLights HVDC Project

ABB POWER SYSTEMS CONSULTING

Experiences with Wind Power Plants with Low SCR

PJM Generator Interconnection Request Queue #R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study September 2008

Hawai'i Island Planning and Operations MEASURES TO IMPROVE RELIABILITY WITH HIGH DER

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-226-FEAS-R3

TransWest Express Project

SCC Greenhouse Gas Assessment

15 Nelson-Marlborough Regional Plan

PRESENTATION BY ENERGY COMMISSION OF GHANA ON TACKLING POWER SYSTEM LOSSES

Distributed Energy Resources

Transcription:

Operational Planning Study Report RTA to BCH transfer limit updates For Kitimat 4 Capacitor Banks Report No. T&S Planning 2013-062 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority 2013. All rights reserved.

Prepared by: Jun Lu October 16, 2013 Senior Engineer, Performance Planning, BC Hydro Date Approved by: Guihua Wang October 16, 2013 Manager, Performance Planning, BC Hydro Date. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved ii

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY, LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This report was prepared by BC HYDRO solely for the purposes described in this report, and is based on information available to BC HYDRO as of the date of this report. Accordingly, this report is suitable only for such purposes, and is subject to any changes arising after the date of this report. Unless otherwise expressly agreed by BC HYDRO, BC HYDRO does not represent or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this report, or any information contained in this report, for use or consideration by any third party, nor does BC HYDRO accept any liability out of reliance by a third party on this report, or any information contained in this report, or for any errors or omissions in this report. Any use or reliance by third parties is at their own risk. COPYRIGHT NOTICE Copyright and all other intellectual property rights are expressly reserved to BC HYDRO. Without prior written approval of BC HYDRO, no part of this report shall be reproduced or distributed in any manner or form whatsoever. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved iii

Executive Summary Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA) has requested BCH Transmission Planning to conduct operation planning study to update RTA to BCH transfer limits for KIT 4 shunt capacitor bank scenario. Study results indicated that, RTA to BCH transfer limits from transient performance perspective, with KIT 4 shunt capacitor banks, can be increased to higher numbers which are similar to the scenario with KIT 5 shunt capacitor banks. The current transfer limits containing in the BC Hydro s operating order 7T-30 (issued on March 21, 2012) were estimated based on a conservative approach. Detailed study results are summarized in Appendix A and will be used for updating operating order 7T-30. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved iv

Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND... 1 2. STUDY CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS... 1 3. STUDY CRITERIA... 2 4. STUDY RESULTS... 2 APPENDIX A: RTA TO BCH TRANSFER LIMITS... 3 Table A - 1 RTA to BCH Transfer limits (with separation scheme at KIT)... 4 Table A - 2 Calculation formulas for Parameters A and B (with separation scheme at KIT)... 4 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved v

1. Background RTA has requested BCH to conduct operational planning study to update RTA to BCH transfer limits for 4 shunt capacitor bank scenario under system normal conditions due to: (1) Changes in RTA System The shunt capacitor associated with potline 8 has de-rated to 36.8 MVAR from 55 MVAR when potline 8 was shutdown, around August 2010. The shunt capacitor associated with Potline 2 was blown out in April 2013, and may not be available in the future. (2) Deficiency in existing OO 7T-30 RTA to BCH transfer limits for the case of 4 shunt capacitor banks in service under system normal condition were not studied. The transfers in 7T-30 were estimated based on a conservative approach and very restrictive. 2. Study Conditions and Assumptions The studies are conducted based on the following conditions and assumptions: Base case: Bulk system 2013 light summer base case North Coast region system normal All major transmission system equipment in service 5 shunt capacitor banks available while one bank maybe out of service at KIT Three generation patterns at KMO: 8 units with a total maximum generation of 880 MW, 7 units with a total maximum generation of 840 MW, 6 units with a total maximum generation of 720 MW. KIT load range from 302 MW to 480 MW MIN load range from 0 MW to 50 MW KIT Separation Scheme in service Out-of-step Protection on 2L103 (KIT-MIN) in service British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 1

3. Study Criteria Separation Scheme Protection The separation scheme consists of two relays installed by RTA at KIT to detect multiphase faults in the RTA system and in the BCH system. If either relay detects a multiphase fault, then the KIT to MIN line 2L103 will be tripped immediately. Out-of-Step protection The MIN terminal of 2L103 is equipped with an Out-of-Step relay that will detect power swings between the KMO generators and the BCH system, and the MIN Out-of-Step settings are as follows: Protection Out-of-Step Relay Settings Apparent impedance looking from MIN to KIT: 0.18 0.16 p.u. Apparent impedance looking from MIN to SKA: 0.18 0.16 p.u. Apparent impedance crossing I 0.18 0.16 I gap time: 2 cycles Supervision voltage: 0.85p.u. Supervision voltage delay time: 5 cycles The transfer limits and KMO generations shedding requirement are based on the Out-of-Step Relay setting as that the system performance in MIN area is protected. 4. Study Results Study results indicate that From transient stability performance perspective with 4 shunt capacitor banks in service at KIT, RTA to BCH transfer limits can be increased to higher numbers, close to the case with 5 banks in service at KIT. In some situations, 4 capacitor banks at KIT would have better transient performance than 5 shunt capacitor banks due to the reduced KIT load (range between 302 MW to 480 MW) has reduced shunt compensation requirement, with 4 shunt capacitors in service would result in higher KMO unit terminal voltages to maintain KIT 287 kv bus voltage at 1.0 pu. As a result, KMO units have better transient performance. The existing generation shedding requirements for contingency of 2L101 (SKA to RUP) are still applicable for the new cases with 4 capacitor banks in service at KIT. Detailed study results are summarized in Appendix A. Nomogram A-1 to A-3 are the updated RTA-BCH transfer limits British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 2

Appendix A: RTA to BCH Transfer Limits The RTA to BCH transfer limit, with separation scheme at KIT, for system normal condition and one of Kemano - Kitimat lines OOS is defined as: a) With RTA 420 GS RAS in-service: PT (P_2L103) is the lesser of 420 MW, or 2L103 Rating, or (A + B* L MIN ) b) With RTA 420 GS RAS OOS: PT (P_2L103) is the lesser of 420 MW, or Lesser of (2L103 Rating, 495 MW) - Largest Potline Load, or (A + B* L MIN ) Where Parameters A and B depend on L KIT and are calculated in Table A -2. Notes: 1. RTA 420 GS RAS is a RAS scheme implemented by RTA to avoid 2L103 from thermal overload, or from tripping by the excessive power relay on the loss of one of the Potlines at KIT (35-100 MW) when KIT is connected to the BC Hydro system. 2. L KIT is defined as the net power difference between power flowing into KIT on 87L (KMO- KIT) and 88L (KMO-KIT) and power going out of KIT on 2L103 L KIT is assumed to vary between 302 to 480 MW. If L KIT < 302 MW, set L KIT = 302 MW. If L KIT > 480 MW, the results are not applicable. 3. L MIN is defined as the net power difference between power flowing into MIN on 2L103 and power going out of MIN on 2L99 L MIN is assumed to vary between 0 to 50 MW. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 3

Table A - 1 RTA to BCH Transfer limits (with separation scheme at KIT) System Condition Case Number Number of Kitimat Capacitor Banks In-Service Number of Kemano Units Online 1 4 8 Kitimat Load L KIT (MW) Kitimat to Minette Transfer Limit P T (= P_2L103) range (MW) 302 < L KIT 440 420 MW 440 < L KIT 480 380 MW ~ 420 MW Comments 302 < L KIT 318 420 MW 318 < L KIT 379 380 MW ~ 420 MW System Normal (with separation scheme at KIT) 2 4 7 379 < L KIT 420 370 MW ~ 380 MW 420 < L KIT 440 350 MW ~ 370 MW 440 < L KIT 480 310 MW ~ 350 MW 302 < L KIT 318 380 MW ~ 395 MW 318 < L KIT 348 330 MW ~ 380 MW 3 4 6 348 < L KIT 379 310 MW ~ 330 MW 379 < L KIT 420 280 MW ~ 310 MW 420 < L KIT 440 260 MW ~ 280 MW 440 < L KIT 480 225 MW ~ 260 MW Table A - 2 Calculation formulas for Parameters A and B (with separation scheme at KIT) System Condition System Normal (with separation scheme at KIT) Number of Kitimat Capacitor Banks In-Service Number of Kemano Units Online 4 8 4 7 4 6 Kitimat Load L KIT (MW) Calculation Formulas for A and B 302 < L KIT 440 A = 420 B = 0.0 440 < L KIT 480 A = 420 1.0 (L KIT - 440) B = 0.0 302 < L KIT 318 A = 420 B = 0.0 318 < L KIT 379 A = 420 0.66 (L KIT - 318) B = 0.0-0.8 (A - 420)/40 379 < L KIT 420 A = 380 0.24 (L KIT - 379) B = 0.8 + 0.6 (A - 380)/10 420 < L KIT 440 A = 370 1.0 (L KIT - 420) B = 0.2 440 < L KIT 480 A = 350 1.0 (L KIT - 440) B = 0.2 + 0.2 (A - 350)/40 302 < L KIT 318 A = 395 1.0 (L KIT - 303) B = 0.0 318 < L KIT 348 A = 380 1.67 (L KIT - 318) B = 0.0-0.4 (A - 380)/50 348 < L KIT 379 A = 330 0.65 (L KIT - 348) B = 0.4 + 0.1 (A - 330)/20 379 < L KIT 420 A = 310 0.73 (L KIT - 379) B = 0.3 + 0.3 (A - 310)/30 420 < L KIT 440 A = 280 1.0 (L KIT - 420) B = 0.0 440 < L KIT 480 A = 260 0.88 (L KIT - 440) B = 0.0 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 4

Nomogram A-1 RTA to BCH Transfer limit Under system normal condition with 8 units at KMO and 4 capacitor banks at KIT Limited by maximum allowable real power over 2L103 Limited by acceptable transient performance or KMO reactive power reserves British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 5

Nomogram A-2 RTA to BCH Transfer limit Under system normal condition with 7 units at KMO and 4 capacitor banks at KIT Limited by maximum allowable real power over 2L103 Limited by acceptable transient performance or KMO reactive power reserves British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 6

Nomogram A-3 RTA to BCH Transfer limit Under system normal condition with 6 units at KMO and 4 capacitor banks at KIT Limited by maximum allowable real power over 2L103 Limited by acceptable transient performance or KMO reactive power reserves British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2013. All rights reserved 7