Virginia Cooperative Organization Sponsored Jointly by the Virginia. Virginia. opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this

Similar documents
Appendix 11-B 24-HOUR RAINFALL DEPTH DATA FOR VIRGINIA

Section 2B.59 Weight Limit Signs - Interim Revisions

SIGNING UPDATES MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), 2009 EDITION. CLIFF REUER SDLTAP WESTERN SATELLITE (c)

opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this

Act 229 Evaluation Report

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

EVAS~~~~ EMERGENCY VEHICLE ALERT SYSTEM

sponsoring agencies.)

Memorandum Federal Highway Administration

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Over-Dimensional Vehicle Restriction Study for US 129 in TN

W Type: Denotes functional type of sign (R = regulatory, W = warning, D = guide signs, and M = route markers)

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

Using a Statewide Model to Analyze Truck Traffic for the I-81 Corridor Study in Virginia

SECTION 12 - CONSTRUCTION AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE OF CONTENTS

Roadway Contributing Factors in Traffic Crashes

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2003 Session. FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised

Wet Accident Reduction Program (WARP) in Virginia. Bipad Saha, P.E. Pavement Design Engineer

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

Geometric Design Elements to Reduce Wrong-Way (WW) Entry at Freeway Interchanges Hugo Zhou, Ph.D., P.E.

Fire Department Access & Water Supply

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

CHAPTER 4 SNOWMOBILES. The Commissioner of Conservation acting directly or through his/her authorized agent.

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs

2015 Community Report White Rock

2014 Community Report Portales

2014 Community Report Luna County

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

2016 Community Report Torrance County

2015 Community Report Torrance County

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

2016 Community Report Portales

Created by: St. Louis County

2016 Community Report De Baca County

Australian/New Zealand Standard

2015 Community Report Grants

TxDOT Guidelines for Acknowledgment Signing

Ch. 167 PORTABLE WARNING DEVICES CHAPTER 167. PORTABLE EMERGENCY WARNING DEVICES

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

2015 Community Report Las Vegas

SKID RESISTANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM

2014 Community Report Las Vegas

2014 Community Report Truth or Consequences

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

2015 Community Report Tularosa

2014 Community Report Tularosa

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

12/18/2015. Apportioned Charter Bus Registration. IRP Ballot 391 Implementation

2016 Community Report Santa Fe County

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

City of Richmond Golf Cart Ordinance Frequently Asked Questions ( p. 1-2) & Rules (p. 3-5)

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A PREVENTABLE ACCIDENT. -or- How I saved myself a lot of grief and money

2015 Community Report Chaparral

2016 Community Report Aztec

2015 Community Report Aztec

2014 Community Report Aztec

2016 Community Report San Juan County

2015 Community Report San Juan County

2015 Community Report Doña Ana County

[Insert name] newsletter CALCULATING SAFETY OUTCOMES FOR ROAD PROJECTS. User Manual MONTH YEAR

2015 Community Report Los Lunas

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Summary of the Alcoa Highway Redevelopment Project

2014 Community Report Los Lunas

Florida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview

DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. LCB File No. R August 31, 2012 October 15, 2012

Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction

PURPOSE POLICY. Page 1 of 6 / S.O.G Highway Operations Pascal Arnes Chief of Fire

TRAFFIC COMMISSION, VILLAGE OF LINCOLNWOOD 6900 N. Lincoln Avenue, Lincolnwood, IL 60712

EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY

Virginia Department of Education. A Regulatory View of Virginia Pupil Transportation

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Grant of Exemption For HELP Inc.

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

Effect of Police Control on U-turn Saturation Flow at Different Median Widths

Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois

ALLEGAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION. Adopted by the Board of County Road Commissioners, December 28, Sign Policy

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Driving Safely in Maryland

VDOT Unused Facilities

Enterprise Fleet Management System

* Numbers are only as accurate as the reporting agency has provided National School Bus Loading & Unloading Survey

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Traffic Accident Statistics

LCDOT DETOUR PROCEDURES. and GUIDELINES

Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

LOADING AND UNLOADING SURVEY NATIONAL SCHOOL BUS. Kansas leads the world in the success of each student.

1999 Missouri State Highway System. Missouri Department of Transportation - Transportation Management Systems

5 SPEED LIMIT REVISIONS ON REGIONAL ROADS JANUARY UPDATE

Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Docket No. NHTSA ; Notice 2]

Transcription:

WITH A DIVIDED HIGHWAY CROSSING SIGN EXPERIMENTS REDUCE WRONG-WAY DRIVING TO N. K. Vaswani Dr. Research Scientist Senior opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this (The are those of author and not necessarily those of report Highway & Transportation Research Council Virginia Cooperative Organization Sponsored Jointly by Virginia (A of Highways & Transportation and Department University of Virginia) 1977 January 77-R36 VHTRC 2939 PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 by sponsoring agencies.) Charlottesville, Virginia

2940

WITH A DIVIDED HIGHWAY CROSSING SIGN EXPERIMENTS REDUCE WRONG-WAY DRIVING TO N. K. Vaswani Dr. Research Scientist Senior on a report (1) by present author, Traffic Based Advisory Committee recommended installation of Research highway crossing signs on Route 29 from Charlottesville divided Culpeper and from Warrenton to Gainesvii!e. The approxi- to 57 miles of road in se two sections include 72 mately intersections. divided highway crossing sign used in this experiment is The copy of one used by Delaware Department of Highways and a Delaware engineers claim that y have used this Transportation. for past 20 years with excellent results. sign Delaware. Department of Highways and Transportation has The Federal Highway Administration to approve an alternate requested paragraph 2B-28 and figure 2-3 of Manual on Uniform Traffic to Devices for streets and highways -(F-MUTCD). The alternate Control divided highway crossing sign should be The on approach legs that intersect with a used highway. The sign shall be used only divided median of divided highway is where than 200 feet wide and re is no visual less in median that would obstruct obstruction driver from seeing both directions of facility when approaching on divided 29 1 PROGRESS REPORT NO. i by DESCRIPTION AND PLACEMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL SIGNS to paragraph 2B-28 as reco mmended by m is as follows" crossroad. (2) 2-3 of F-MUTCD is reproduced in figure i.* The arrangement Figure recommend, is shown in figure 2. This request reflects y *Figures and tables are appended.

Highway and Transportation Department's intention to Delaware away with one-way sign most commonly found at intersections do Virginia re is a similar need to inform drivers about In geometry of intersection before he begins to negotiate it. addition, research has shown that at many intersections due to In geometrics, it may be very desirable to guide driver improper crossroad through a left turn to far side of from during darkness. For this purpose a "turn around nose" median sign is being recommended for use under following conditions" When cro ssroad slopes downwards from 4-1ane a. highway such that headlights of cars divided highway from crossroad do not approaching on road surface, as is shown on left fall The dual lanes of 4-1ane divided highway are at b. elevations and headlights do not illu- different nose of median, as is shown on minate in Figure 3. right When crossroads meet 4-1ane divided highway c. an angle such that driver is unable to locate at Any or causes which obstruct a driver's view of d. nose of median on his left. When nose of median on driver's left is e. visible during darkness and it may be necessary not "turn around nose" sign. The "'turn around nose" of should be so located as to lie within keg of nig.ht legi- sign divided highway crossing sign as recommended by Dela- The Department of Highways and Transportat.ion is of two designs ware a T-intersect<on on a divided highway. Each of se signs is for mm (24 in.) wide and 450 mm (18 in.) high. The. turn around 610 sign is shown in Figure 7. It is 610 m.m (24 in.) wide and nose mm (30 in.) high. Each of se signs has a non reflectorized 760 legend and border on a white reflectorized background of black grade sheeting. engineering 2942 of crossroads and 4-1ane divided highways. in Figure 3. nose of median on his left. use this reflectorized sign to help provide guidance. to 4 shows Delaware recommenda.tions and also provision Figure described by author in earlier presentations( ) and as bility in Figure 4. shown shown in Figures 5 and 6. The one in Figure 5 is for a cross- as intersection on a divided highway and one in Figure 6 is road

highway crossing signs are intended to inform drivers Divided divided highways from crossroads of geometry of entering On non-signalized intersections such signs could, intersections. be placed below stop sign or signs as shown in refore, 2. On signalized intersections, y could be placed under Figure signs near stop line. Preferably, y should be regulatory experimental sections of Route 29 locations of On highway crossing signs vary from intersection to intersection, divided eir left or right corner of intersection of cross- on with 4-1ane divided highway, or stop signs were on h oth road In where sign islands were provided re was eir corners. cases sign on sign island or one on right and corner stop one on island. Whatever location of stop sign, one highway crossing sign has been placed under it. F gures 8 divided 9 show two types of such locations. On two experimenta and "turn around nose ' s gns_ have been provided near sections, of medians at all intersections. These signs should be noses as near nose and as near driver entering provided highway as possible, because this placement will enable divided driver to see sign under low beam headlights at nigh. engineers often have to collaborate with such private parties traffic rovide divided highway crossing signs within ir domain. On to driver approaching a divided highway from a crossroad is A by a stop sign that he must stop and is informed of informed signs like those shown in Figures 8 and 9 become redundant 0ne-way installation of divided highway crossing sign, and after redundancy is increased by installation of turn around ir nose signs. One-way signs below guide signs as shown in Figure 8 also are redundant. Division of Highways engineers argue that con- Delaware caused by a series of one-way signs as shown in Figure i fusion be eli inated by use of divided highway crossing signs would shown in Figure 2. Removal of redundant signs is essential as 29 3 on right-hand side of driver entering intersection placed shown in Figure 2. s upon where stop sign was already located. I cases depending sign islands did not exist re was eir one stop sign where times wrong-way entries have been caused by drivers coming Many of private residential or commercial areas, and district out two experimental sections during last three years re only one fatal accident. This accident was caused by a wrong- was driver coming out of private property (Badger Powhattan Plant) way Route 29. Therefore, provision of sign on private property on should not be over looked. of intersection by a divided highway crossing sign. geometry latter sign also tells him direction of permissible travel. The to reduce sign congestion.

best way to determine effect of divided highway. The signs on two sections of Route 29 is to study crossing on wrong-way entries before and after ir installation. data installation of se signs took about one month and was The on April 23, 1976. Wrong-way entry data for about 4 completed before this installation,.covering period from January years that 9 wrong-way entries were reported during 3 years shows to installation and that no wrong-way entries have been prior since installation. This period of evaluation is recorded short to allow any definite conclusions, however, results too to be encouraging. The following recommendations are re- seem made: fore Continue evaluation, by studying wrong-way entry I. accidents due to wrong-way entries, and counts, The divided highway crossing sign and turn around 2. nose sign should be provided at all cross and T subdivis'on roads, on two experimental residential This experiment should be extended to all sections. The reason for this is as follows" many a time route. traffic police officer is not able to. determine location of wrong-way entry. The provision of exact divided highway crossing signs at all junctions will case of a wrong-way entry prove that driver did in divided highway crossing sign. ignore Since provision of experimental signs have created 3. problems and results seem encouraging, types of no signs should be tried at following locations. Intersections of interstate exit ramps a. 4-1ane divided crossroads. Table 2 and data on wrong-way entries at such gives Priority should be given to locations. installation of signs at listed in Table 2. intersections Intersections or than those with exit b. where wrong-way entries have been ramps EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1973, to October 22, 1976, which included a period of about 7 i, after installation, are given in Table i. This table months subjective questioning. of 4-!ane divided highways with cross- intersections including intersections with commercial and roads, on Route 29 between Culpeper and Warrenton intersections all intersections in townships along this including

The signs were publicized immediately after ir 4. Frequently, publicity by district installation. engineers about meaning and purpose of traffic would lead public to familiarize mselves signs signs and would enable better conformance with with sign messages. 2945 reported during last 6 repeatedly Table 3 lists such locations. years.

Vaswani, N. K., "Engineering Measures for Reducing Wrong-way i. Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, Driving," Delaware Division of Highways. A letter dated August 2, 1976, 2. Raymond S. Pusey, Chief, Bureau of Traffic, to Robert E. from Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D. C. Connor, for approval of intersection plan containing divided asking Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, 1977, Washington D. C. January REFERENCES VHTRC 76-R8, September 1975. highway crossing sign. 3. "Summary of Wrong-way Incident Data, " Traffic and Saeety Division, Highway and Transportation Department, and Virginia Virginia of State Police. Department Vaswani, N. K., "Poor Visibility Under Low Beam Headlights, A 4. Cause of Wrong-way Driving, a paper to be presented at Common

294

APPENDIX

i. Location of one-way and turn prohibition signs Figure shown in Figure.2-3 of F-M..UT.CD. as 2951

2952 2. Location of divided highway cmossing sign. Figume by Delawame Department of High- (Recommended and Tmansportation as an altemnate to ways shown in Figume 2-3 of F-MUTCD.) signs

(1] -i--i 0 I 0 o 2953 0 ro, 0 :,ii:::iiii:i::::.;i,-t 0 o o 0,z::l

4. Turn around nose sign superimposed on Figure Department of Highways and Transportation Delaware sign system shown in Figure 2. of Night Keg Visibility

2955 610 mm -- 2 in. DIVIDED Figure Four-legged intemseetion divided highway crossing HIGHWAY sign. 610 mm = 24 in. DIVIDED Figure Three-legged intersection divided highway crossing HIGHWAY sign. 610 mm -- 24 in. Figure Turn around nose sign.

295 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 -I 0 0 0 0 1 4-, o,---1 4-,

2957 " o 0 h. bo>u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

o II II II IIII 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 O0 0 o o 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 o o 4[ o o

4-1ane Highway 17 17 29 29 29 29 29 29 58 58 60 60 250 250 301 301 301 301 301 301 i'60 360 Crossroad 028 028 O28 O28 228 228 033 033 24 24 28 28 230 230 719 719 605 605 621 621 638 638 46 46 687 687 033 033 1426 1426 614 614 035 035 040 040 624 624 024 024 226 226 685 685 Bus. Bus. of Repeated Wrong-way Entries 4-1ane Divided Highway Intersections Where Sites Highway Crossing Sign and Turn Around Nose Sign Should be Provided Divided Accident Date of Driver Light Direction ""Yes o killed County 6-71 Drunk W in EBL No Loudoun 12-71 Drunk W in EBL No Loudo n 8-?2 Drunk Loudoun 5-73 Drunk W in EBL Yes 3 Loudoun 2-74 Nervous W in EBL No Loudoun 3-76 Nervous W in EBL Yes Loudoun 11-70 Unknown N in SBL No Gloucester 8-71 N in SBL Yes Gloucester 12-70 Drunk S in NBL No Campbell 1-72 Drunk N in SBL No Campbell 6-72 Normal N in SBL No Fauquier 7-72 Drunk S in NBL No Fauquier 10-70 Drunk N in SBL No Madison 2-76 Normal N in SBL No Madison 12-70 Normal Pittsylvania 10-71 Drunk Pittsylvania Queen 5-72 Normal King Queen 2-74 Normal King 10-71 Normal Mecklenburg 8-75 Drunk Mecklenburg 8-70 Drunk Brunswick 6-72 Drunk Brunswick 9-70 Drunk Brunswick 9-70 Drunk Brunswick i0-72 Normal Southampton 8-72 Normal Southampton Kent i0-70 Drunk New Kent 4-73 Normal New 9-72 Confused Augusta 7-73 Confused Augusta George 6-71 Drunk King George 8-72 Drunk King George 6-72 Drunk Prince George 1-73 Drunk Prince 9-70 Normal Sussex i0-71 Drunk Sussex 8'70 Normal Richmond 11-71 Normal Richmond 8-70 Normal Appomattox 9-70 Drunk Appomattox Appomattox ll-71 Drunk ll-71 Drunk Appomattox ll-71 Drunk Appomattox Appomattox 6-72 Normal 12-72 Drunk Dinwiddie 9-73 Normal Dinwiddie 10-73 Normal Montgomery 10-73 Normal Montgomery S in NBL No S in NBL No W in EBL No W in EBL Yes Dusk W in EBL No W in EBL No N in SBL No N in SBL No S in NBL Yes S in NBL Yes N in SBL Yes N in SBL No W in EBL No W in EBL W in EBL No W in EBL No S in NBL Yes not help, may strip pro- Rumble after May vided 1973. 2959 Table Remarks Injured Incidence Condition of Travel No All drivers drunk, Signs Bus. W in EBL No 024 226 Dinwiddie 9-73 Normal