Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios Scenario 1: Current Target Formula Distribution Scenarios Substituting Measures Scenario 2: Substituting Lane Miles at PSR<3 for All Lane Miles Scenario 3: Substituting Bridge Area, over 20 sq. ft. at SR<50 for All Bridge Area over 20 sq. ft. Scenario 4: Substituting Lane Miles at PSR<3 and Bridge Area SR<50 for Lane Miles and Bridge Area Scenario 5: Substituting Congested VMT (using IRC Thresholds) for All VMT Scenario 6: Substituting the above three variables as defined, Keeping Buses, Future Population and Heavy Commercial VMT as in Current Formula State Transportation Plan Scenarios Scenario 7: -Based / State Transportation Plan Targets Scenario 8: -Based / Management System Needs Scenario 9: -Based / State Transportation Plan Targets & / Scenario 10: -Based / Management System Needs & / 8-25-2004 1
Scenario 1: Current Target Formula Data sy Bridge area 1 Size Lane Miles 2 25% Usage Bridge (1) Mn/DOT Bridge Inventory, all bridges 20 feet and over, September 1998 TIS, September 1998 VMT (4) Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 1998 HCVMT (4') Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 1998 Scenario 2: Target Formula Distribution Substituting Lane Miles with PSR<3 for All Lane Miles sy Bridge Area 1 2 (PSR < 3.0) 25% Bridge (1) Mn/DOT Bridge Inventory, all bridges 20 feet and over, September 1, 1998 (2) All Roads except Rural Minor Collectors, Rural Locals and Urban Locals, from TIS, Using Miles with PSR<3.0. Measures, 2002 VMT (4) Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 HCVMT (4') Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, september 2, 1998 8-25-2004 2
Scenario 3: Target Formula Distribution Substituting Bridge Area SR<50 for All Bridge Area over 20sq.ft. sy Bridges 1 Lane Miles 2 25% (1) Mn/DOT Bridge Inventory, all bridges 20 feet and over, Using area with SR<50, Bridge Bridge Measure, 2002 TIS, September 2, 1998 VMT (4) Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 HCVMT (4) Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 Scenario 4: Target Formula Distribution Substituting Bridge Area SR<50 for All Bridge Area over 20sq.ft.and Lane Miles with PSR<3 for All Lane Miles sy Bridges 1 2 (PSR < 3.0) 25% (1) Mn/DOT Bridge Inventory, all bridges 20 feet and over, Using area with SR<50, Bridge Bridge Measure, 2002 TIS, Using Miles with PSR<3.0. Measures, 2002 VMT (4) Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 HCVMT (4) Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 8-25-2004 3
Scenario 5: Target Formula Distribution Substituting Congested VMT For All VMT sy Bridge Area 1 Lane Miles 2 25% VMT Congested VMT 4 25% Bridge (1) Mn/DOT Bridge Inventory, all bridges 20 feet and over, September 1, 1998 TIS, September 2, 1998 (4) Congested VMT on all roads, using the IRC threshold of above medium level of Congested VMT congestion for each road type. HCVMT (4') Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 Scenario 6: Target Formula Distribution Substituting Bridge Area SR<50,Lane Miles PSR<3 and Congested VMT sy Bridges 1 2 (PSR < 3.0) 25% VMT Congested VMT 4 25% (1) Mn/DOT Bridge Inventory, all bridges 20 feet and over, Using area with SR<50, Bridge Bridge Measure, 2002 TIS, Using Miles with PSR<3.0. Measures, 2002 (4) Congested VMT, using the IRC threshold of above medium level of congestion Congested VMT for each road type. HCVMT (4') Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel from TIS, September 2, 1998 8-25-2004 4
Scenario 7: -Based State Transportation Plan Targets 100% bridge area (sq ft) (PSR < 3.0) Bridges 20% VMT Congested VMT 20% 2001 to 2003 PSR ( Service Rating) provided by Management Bridges 2003 Bridge Structural Sufficiency Rating provided by Bridge Management Office 2000 to 2002 Crash Data provided by Traffic Security and Operations Office (Loren Hill) Scenario 8: -Based Management System Needs 100% Needs Bridge Needs 20% VMT Congested VMT 20% Needs based on Management System (Dave Janisch) Bridges Bridge Needs based on Bridge Management System (Bridge Office) 2000 to 2002 Crash Data provided by Traffic Security and Operations Office (Loren Hill) 8-25-2004 5
Scenario 9: -Based State Transportation Plan Targets & / bridge area (sq ft) (PSR < 3.0) Bridge Condition VMT Congested VMT / Lane-Miles VMT Heavy Commercial Vehicle Miles Traveled Lane-Miles VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled 5% All buses Buses 5% 2001 to 2003 PSR ( Service Rating) provided by Management Bridges 2003 Bridge Structural Sufficiency Rating provided by Bridge Management Office 2000 to 2002 Crash Data provided by Traffic Security and Operations Office (Loren Lanc Miles 2004 Federal Aid Eligible Lane Miles from TIS (Warren Seavey) Heavy Commercial 2002 Trunk Highway Heavy Commercial VMT from TIS (Warren Seavey) Vehicle Miles Traveled 2002 Federal Aid Eligible Vehicle Miles Traveled from TIS (Warren Seavey) Buses 1997 Minnesota Transit Report 8-25-2004 6
Scenario 10: -Based Management System Needs & / Needs Bridge Needs VMT Congested VMT / Lane-Miles VMT Heavy Commercial Vehicle Miles Traveled Lane-Miles VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled 5% All buses Buses 5% Needs based on Management System (Dave Janisch) Bridges Bridge Needs based on Bridge Management System (Bridge Office) 2000 to 2002 Crash Data provided by Traffic Security and Operations Office Lanc Miles 2004 Federal Aid Eligible Lane Miles from TIS (Warren Seavey) Heavy Commercial 2002 Trunk Highway Heavy Commercial VMT from TIS (Warren Seavey) Vehicle Miles Traveled 2002 Federal Aid Eligible Vehicle Miles Traveled from TIS (Warren Seavey) Buses 1997 Minnesota Transit Report 8-25-2004 7