CHAPTER 8 LAUNCH SITE OPERATION

Similar documents
CHAPTER 8 LAUNCH SITE OPERATION

CHAPTER 8 LAUNCH SITE OPERATION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-2E

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-3C

SOYUZ-IKAR-FREGAT 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SOYUZ Series : SOYUZ Version : SOYUZ-IKAR SOYUZ-FREGAT

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

Pre-Launch Procedures

USA DELTA DELTA Mc DONNELL DOUGLAS SPACE SYSTEMS

Taurus II. Development Status of a Medium-Class Launch Vehicle for ISS Cargo and Satellite Delivery

Success of the H-IIB Launch Vehicle (Test Flight No. 1)

Atlas V Launches the Orbital Test Vehicle-1 Mission Overview. Atlas V 501 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex 41

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM START 1 USER S HANDBOOK VOLUME II: PRE-LAUNCH PREPARATION, LAUNCH, & COSMODROME OPERATIONS

The Falcon 1 Flight 3 - Jumpstart Mission Integration Summary and Flight Results. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2008 Paper SSC08-IX-6

Rapid Coupled Loads Analysis and Spacecraft Load Reduction using SoftRide

LOGOTYPE TONS MONOCHROME

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

6. The Launch Vehicle

Routine Scheduled Space Access For Secondary Payloads

USA ATHENA 1 (LLV 1)

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

System Testing by Flight Operators the Rosetta Experience

USGIF Small Satellite Working Group Resilient SmallSat Launch-on-Demand

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41

H-IIA Launch Vehicle Upgrade Development

BY HOEYCOMB AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES. HC-330 HYBRID-POWERED ALL- ELECTRICITY DRIVEN four-rotor UAV

LAUNCHERONE: REVOLUTIONARY ORBITAL TRANSPORT FOR SMALL SATELLITES

Rocket 101. IPSL Space Policy & Law Course. Andrew Ratcliffe. Head of Launch Systems Chief Engineers Team

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

GK L A U N C H SER VICES MOSCOW 2017

Access to Space. ISRO s Current Launch. & Commercial Opportunities. S Somanath Project Director, GSLV Mk III VSSC, ISRO

monthly NEWSLETTER OCTOBER 2015 Copyright 2015 M-Fly

IST Sounding Rocket Momo User Guide

NanoRacks External Payload Platform

PSLV 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SLV Series : PSLV (1) Version : PSLV-C (2)

Capabilities Summary and Approach to Rideshare for 20 th Annual Small Payload Rideshare Symposium NASA Ames Research Center June 12-14, 2018

Development of Japan s Next Flagship Launch Vehicle

Development Status of H3 Launch Vehicle -To compete and survive in the global commercial market-

EXOMARS MSA. TEST HDRM DEVELOPMENT FOR SEPARATION PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION

Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business. Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators

Star Tower. Why Aerostats Star Tower: Applications Summary. Description Performance Features Payload. Product CARAVAN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Canisterized Satellite Dispenser (CSD) As A Standard For Integrating and Dispensing Hosted Payloads on Large Spacecraft and Launch Vehicles

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41 CCAFS, FL

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

DemoSat-B User s Guide

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

VSS V1.5. This Document Contains No ITAR Restricted Information But Is Not Cleared for General Public Distribution

Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Low Cost Spacelift to LEO, GTO, and Beyond Using the OSP-2 Peacekeeper Space Launch Vehicle

The Electric Propulsion Development in LIP

July 28, ULA Rideshare Capabilities

Development of a Dedicated Launch System for Nanosat-Class Payloads

THE KOREASAT5 PROGRAM

Antares Rocket Launch recorded on 44 1 Beyond HD DDR recorders Controlled by 61 1 Beyond Systems total

In-Space Demonstration of HighPerformance Green Propulsion (HPGP) and its Impact on Small Satellites

ELECTRIC PROPULSION MISSION TO GEO USING SOYUZ/FREGAT LAUNCH VEHICLE M.S. Konstantinov *, G.G. Fedotov *, V.G. Petukhov ±, G.A.

An Overview of Electric Propulsion Activities in China

TacSat-4 I&T, Launch Processing, and Early Flight Operations Experience

Seminar 12! The Future of Space Flight! Spacecraft Power & Thermal Control!

TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

The 22M Class Aerostat: Increased Capabilities for the Small Tethered Aerostat Surveillance System

Systems Engineering. Chris Hall AOE 4065 Fall 2005

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

Safety Assessment for secondary payloads launched by Japanese Expendable Launch Vehicle

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

Vector-R Forecasted Launch Service Guide

Research on Transient Stability of Large Scale Onshore Wind Power Transmission via LCC HVDC

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Validation System (EVS)

Eliminating the Need for Payload-specific Coupled Loads Analysis

Flight and Terminal Ballistic Performance Demonstration of a Gun-Launched Medium Caliber Ramjet Propelled Air Defense Projectile

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

CONTENTS Duct Jet Propulsion / Rocket Propulsion / Applications of Rocket Propulsion / 15 References / 25

SDO YUZHNOYE S CAPABILITIES IN SPACE DOMAIN

The European Lunar Lander Mission

Boeing CST-100. Commercial Crew Transportation System. Keith Reiley, The Boeing Company. February, 2011

INSTALLATION, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL MODEL BC.

Cable Dragging Horizontal Takeoff Spacecraft Air Launch System

Formation Flying Experiments on the Orion-Emerald Mission. Introduction

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

In the spring of 2009, a Russian Soyuz

DESIGN OF A MODULAR STEERING SYSTEM TEST BENCH FOR DURABILITY, PERFORMANCE AND CHARACTERIZATION TESTS

SOYUZ TO LAUNCH GALILEO

Upper Stage Evolution

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

2012 Cubesat Workshop. ULA Rideshare Update APR 19, 2012

Low Speed Wind Turbines. Current Applications and Technology Development

Adaptation of Existing Fuze Technology to Increase the Capability of the Navy s 2.75-Inch Rocket System

MINI-REIS A FAMILY OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL UNMANNED LIGHT JET AIRCRAFTS

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

CALL FOR IDEAS FOR THE RE-USE OF THE MARS EXPRESS PLATFORM PLATFORM CAPABILITIES. D. McCoy

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

First results and next steps in Kazakhstan Earth Observation missions in cooperation with SSTL

AMSAT-NA FOX Satellite Program

LlSA Pathfinder PROPULSION MODULE MECHANICAL INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT. UK EXPORT CONTROL RATING : 9E001 Rated By : K. Tomkins.

Transcription:

Launch Site Operation mainly includes: LV Checkouts and Processing; SC Checkouts and Processing; SC and LV Combined Operations. LAUNCH SITE OPERATION The typical working flow and requirements of the launch site operation are introduced in this chapter. For different launch missions, the launch site operation will be different, especially for combined operations related to joint efforts from SC and LV sides. Therefore, the combined operations could be performed only if the operation procedures are coordinated and approved by all sides. LM-2E uses JSLC and XSLC as its launch sites. The launch site operations in the two launch sites are described as follows. Part A: Launch Operations in JSLC Two-stage LM-2E and LM-2E/ETS are launched from in JSLC. A8.1 LV Checkouts and Processing Two-stage LM-2E or LM-2E/ETS launch vehicle is transported from CALT facility (Beijing, China) to JSLC (Gansu Province, China), and undergoes various checkouts and processing in South Technical Center and South Launch Center of JSLC. The typical LV working flow in the launch site is shown in Figure A8-1. Issue 1999 8-1

In Technical Center In Launch Center Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Figure A8-1 LV Working Flow in JSLC 8-2 Issue 1999 8-2

A8.2 Combined Operation Procedures Take LM-2E/ETS launching multiple SCs as an example: A8.2.1 SC Integration and Fairing Encapsulation in South Technical Center In BS3, SC team carries out all the SC operations. LV side is responsible for mating SCs with dispenser and installing SC separation devices. The following describes the typical working procedure: 1. CALT to bolt the dispenser on the supporting table; 2. SC team to lift up SCs, and CALT to mate them with dispenser one by one and install SC/LV separation devices; 3. CALT to complete the SC/LV integration and form a SC/Dispenser stack; 4. CALT to mate OMS with payload adapter in BLS and to transfer the OMS/Adapter stack from BLS to BS3; CALT to set up the fairing encapsulation pad in BS3. 5. CALT to bolt the OMS/Adapter stack on the fairing encapsulation pad; 6. CALT to integrate the SC/Dispenser stack with OMS/Adapter stack. See Figure A8-2. 7. CALT to encapsulate the fairing in BS3; 8. CALT to remove the fairing fixture, and to install the hoisting basket; See Figure A8-3. Issue 1999 8-3

In BS3 In BLS Payload Adapter Supporting Table 1. To bolt the dispenser on supporting table. 2. To mate the spacecraft with the dispenser one by one. 3. To complete the integration and form a SC/Dispenser stack. a). To bolt Payload Adapter on a supporting table. b). To mate the OMS with Payload Adapter, and form aoms/adapter stack 4. To transfer the OMS /Adapter stack from BLS to BS3, 5. To bolt the OMS/Adapter stack on the pad. 6. To integrate the SC/Dispenser stack and to set up the fairing encapsulation pad. with OM S/Adapter stack. Figure A8-2 Payload/LV Integration 8-4 Issue 1999 8-4

Hoisting Basket 7. To encapsulate the fairing. 8. To remove the fairing fixture, and to install the hoisting basket. Figure A8-3 Fairing Encapsulation in BS3 8-5 Issue 1999 8-5

A8.2.2 SC Transfer and Fairing/Stage-2 Integration CLTC is responsible for transferring the encapsulated fairing from BS3 to BLS. The following working procedures are performed: 9. CLTC to lift the encapsulated fairing onto the transfer vehicle and to fasten the fairing with ropes; CLTC to drive the vehicle from BS3 to BLS; 10.CLTC to release the encapsulated fairing from the transfer vehicle; CLTC to install hoisting slings to the encapsulated fairing inside BLS; 11.CLTC to lift the fairing onto the second stage of LM-2E, which is already erected; 12. CALT to mate the encapsulated fairing with stage-2 of LM-2E. This is the end of the combined operations. See Figure A8-4. After the above-mentioned combined operation is all over, LM-2E carrying SCs will undergo various functional checkouts inside BLS, then it will be transferred to launch center by moveable launch pad. A8.3 SC Preparation and Checkouts CALT and CLTC are responsible for checking and verifying the umbilical cables and RF links. If necessary, SC team could witness the operation. LV accessibility and RF silence time restriction must be considered, when SC team performs operation to SCs. Issue 1999 8-6

9. To lift the encapsulated fairing stack onto the transfer vehicle, and to drive the vehicle from BS3 to BLS. 10. To move the encapsulated fairing stack into BLS and install hoisting sling. 11. To lift up the encapsulated fairing onto the LM-2E. 12. To mate the encapsulated fairing with stage-2 of LM-2E. Figure A8-4 Payload Transfer and Fairing/stage-2 integration 8-7 Issue 1999 8-7

A8.4 Launch Limitation A8.4.1 Weather Limitation Ambient temperature: -10 C~+40 C; Relative humidity: 98% (corresponding to 20±5 C) The average ground wind velocity in the launch area is lower than 10m/s The winds aloft limitation: q α 3400N/m 2 rad (q α reflects the aerodynamic loads acting on the LV, whereas, q is the dynamic head, and α is LV angle of attack.) The horizontal visibility in the launch area is farther than 20km. No thunder and lightning in the range of 40km around the launch area, the atmosphere electrical field strength is weaker than 10kV/m. A8.4.2 "GO" Criteria for Launch The SCs' status is normal, and ready for launch. The launch vehicle is normal, and ready for launch. All the ground support equipment is ready; All the people withdraw to the safe area. A8.5 Pre-launch Countdown Procedure The typical pre-launch countdown procedure in the launch day is listed below: No. Time Event 1-6 hours Preliminary Calculation by Flight Software 2-5 hours Functional Checkouts on Each Sub-system 3-4 hours GSE Withdrawal, LV Status Checkouts, Sealing 4-2 hours Preparing to Move Back the Service Tower 5-80 minutes Moving Back the Service Tower; Accurately aiming; Ground Telemetry and Tracking Systems Power-on; 6-60 minutes Preliminarily Loading Flight Software; Loading PUS Software; 7-50 minutes Tank Pressurization 8-40 minutes Gas Pipes and Air-conditioning Pipes Drop-off; Flight Software Loading; SC Power Switch-over; Issue 1999 8-8

On-board Telemetry and Tracking Systems Power-on 9-5 minutes Telemetry, Tracking and Propellant Utilization Systems Power Switch-over; 10-60 seconds Control System Power Switch-over; Control System, Telemetry System and Tracking System Umbilical Disconnection; Moving Back the Cable Swing Arms; 11-30 seconds TT&C Systems Starting; 12-7 seconds Camera on; 13 0 seconds Ignition. A8.6 Post-launch Activities The orbital parameters of the injected orbit will be provided to Customer in half-hours after SC injection. The launch evaluation report will be provided to the Customer in a month after launch. Issue 1999 8-9

Part B: Launch Operations in XSLC Two-stage LM-2E and LM-2E/EPKM are launched from XSLC. B8.1 LV Checkouts and Processing The launch vehicle is transported from CALT facility (Beijing, China) to XSLC (Sichuan Province, China), and undergoes various checkouts and processing in Technical Center and Launch Center of XSLC. The typical LV working flow in the launch site is shown in Table 8-1. T E C H. Table 8-1 LV Working Flow in the Launch Site No. Item Working Period Accumulative Period 1 To Unload LV from the Train and Transfer LV to BL1. 1 day 1 day 2 Unit Tests of Electrical System 7 days 8 days 3 Tests to Separate Subsystems 3 days 11 days 4 Matching Test Among Subsystems 4 days 15 days 5 Three Overall Checkouts 4 days 19 days 6 Review on Checkout Results 1 day 20 days 7 LV Status Recovery before Transfer 2 days 22 days 8 To Transfer LV to Launch Center 1 days 23 days L 9 Erecting LV on the Launch Pad 2 days 25 days A 10 Tests to Separate Subsystems 3 days 28 days U 11 Matching Test Among Subsystems 3 days 31 days N 12 The first and second overall checkouts 2 days 33 days C 13 To Transfer SC/Fairing Stack to Launch Center 1 days 34 days H 14 EMC Testing 1 days 35 days 15 The Third Overall Checkout (SC Involved) 1 day 36 days C 16 The Fourth Overall Checkout 1 day 37 days E 17 Review on Checkout Results 1 day 38 days N 18 Functional Check before Fueling, Gas Replacement of Tanks 2 days 40 days T 19 N 2 O 4 /UDMH Fueling Preparation 1 days 41 days E 20 N 2 O 4 /UDMH Fueling 0.5 day 41.5 days R 21 Launch 0.5 days 42 days Total 42 days 42 days Issue 1999 8-10

After the SC is transferred to Launch Center, some of SC and LV operations can be performed in parallel under conditions of no interference. B8.2 Combined Operation Procedures Take LM-2E/EPKM launching GTO satellite as an example. B8.2.1 SC Integration and Fairing Encapsulation in Technical Center In BS3, SC team carries out all the SC operations. CALT is responsible for mating SC with EPKM and installing the separation devices. The following describes the working procedure: 1. CALT to bolt the LV adapter on the fairing encapsulation pad; 2. CALT to mate the interface adapter with LV adapter, and install clampband system; 3. CALT to bolt EPKM with interface adapter; 4. SC team to install SC adapter on the SC; 5. SC team to lift up SC and move SC onto the EPKM; 6. CALT to bolt SC adapter with EPKM; 7. CALT to encapsulate the fairing in BS3; 8. CALT to remove the fairing fixture, and to install the hoisting basket; B8.2.2 SC Transfer CLTC is responsible for transferring the encapsulated fairing from BS3 to Launch Center. The following working procedures are performed: 9. CLTC to lift the encapsulated fairing onto the special vehicle and to fasten the fairing with ropes; CLTC to connect the air-conditioning to the fairing if necessary; CLTC to drive the vehicle from BS3 to Launch Service Tower; 10. CLTC to release the encapsulated fairing from the transfer vehicle; CLTC to install slings to the encapsulated fairing under the Launch Service Tower; CLTC to lift the fairing onto the 8 th floor of the tower; Issue 1999 8-11

B8.2.3 SC/LV Integration in Launch Center The encapsulated fairing will be mated with the LV second stage on the service tower. The following working procedures are performed: 11. CALT to hoist the encapsulated fairing above the LV second stage; 12. CALT to joint the bottom of the fairing with LV second stage; CLTC to remove the hoisting basket outside the fairing; CLTC to connect the SC umbilical connectors and SC air-conditioning. B8.3 SC Preparation and Checkouts CALT and CLTC are responsible for checking and verifying the umbilical cables and RF links. If necessary, SC team could witness the operation. LV accessibility and RF silence time restriction must be considered, when SC team performs operation to SC. B8.4 Launch Limitation B8.4.1 Weather Limitation Ambient temperature: -10 C~+40 C; Relative humidity: 98% (corresponding to 20±5 C) The average ground wind velocity in the launch area is lower than 10m/s The winds aloft limitation: q α 3400N/m 2 rad (q α reflects the aerodynamic loads acting on the LV, whereas, q is the dynamic head, and α is LV angle of attack.) The horizontal visibility in the launch area is farther than 20km. No thunder and lightning in the range of 40km around the launch area, the atmosphere electrical field strength is weaker than 10kV/m. B8.4.2 "GO" Criteria for Launch The SC s status is normal, and ready for launch. The launch vehicle is normal, and ready for launch. All the ground support equipment is ready; All the people withdraw to the safe area. Issue 1999 8-12

B8.5 Pre-launch Countdown Procedure The typical pre-launch countdown procedure in the launch day is listed below: No. Time Event 1-6 hours Preliminary Calculation by Flight Software 2-5 hours Functional Checkouts on Each Sub-system 3-4 hours GSE Withdrawal, LV Status Checkouts, Sealing 4-2 hours Preparing to Move Back the Service Tower 5-80 minutes Moving Away the Service Tower; Accurately aiming; Ground Telemetry and Tracking Systems Power-on; 6-60 minutes Preliminarily Loading Flight Software; Loading PUS Software; 7-50 minutes Tank Pressurization 8-40 minutes Gas Pipes and Air-conditioning Pipes Drop-off; Flight Software Loading; SC Power Switch-over; On-board Telemetry and Tracking Systems Power-on 9-5 minutes Telemetry, Tracking and Propellant Utilization Systems Power Switch-over; 10-60 seconds Control System Power Switch-over; Control System, Telemetry System and Tracking System Umbilical Disconnection; Moving Back the Cable Swing Arms; 11-30 seconds TT&C Systems Starting; 12-7 seconds Camera on; 13 0 seconds Ignition. B8.6 Post-launch Activities The injection parameters will be provided to Customer in half-hours. The launch evaluation report will be provided to the Customer in a month after launch. Issue 1999 8-13