Truck Route Access Evaluation: Paradise Power Plant, Muhlenberg County, Site #1113

Similar documents
Introduction and Background Study Purpose

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Development of Turning Templates for Various Design Vehicles

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Roadway Contributing Factors in Traffic Crashes

Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction

2016 North Trunk Highway 65 Corridor Coalition Manufacturers Survey

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Association between Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes and Proximity to Rest Areas and Truck Stops

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Corridor Sketch Summary

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Safety Assessment. Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Traffic Engineering Study

ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Investigation and Analysis of Heavy Truck Accidents

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Heavy Truck Involvement in Traffic Accidents and Related Countermeasures

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Technical Feasibility Report

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

Letter of Transmittal

Low-Cost Improvements to Express-Highway Bottleneck Locations

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Submittal Document II.G. D-bar-A Project, Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Bergmman Associates, dated November 3, 2015 ( Traffic Study )

Evaluation of Kentucky s Driver License Point System

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

Existing Conditions Belmont Circle Bourne, MA. Belmont Circle Improvements

1.3 Research Objective

Purpose and Need Report

US 69/75 Controlled Access Highway and Grade Separations Benefit-Cost Analysis Narrative

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

APPENDIX B. Origin Destination Study Data

Diverging Diamond & Roundabouts: How to Keep on Trucking Along. Meredith K Cebelak, PhD, PE & Michael A Flatt, PE

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

2016 Congestion Report

Benefit-Cost Analysis Technical Memo

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

June WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program Seattle, Washington

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY. October 19, 2009

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

1 TO 2 2 TO 3 3 TO 4 11 TO TO 1

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

Highway Construction Worker Dies When Struck By Semi-Tractor Trailer Incident Number: 03KY030

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Transcription:

Transportation Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report University of Kentucky Year 1998 Truck Route Access Evaluation: Paradise Power Plant, Muhlenberg County, Site #1113 Kenneth R. Agent Brian Aldridge Lisa Aultman-Hall David Cain Nicole Lefever Nikiforos Stamatiadis Joel M. Weber University of Kentucky, ken.agent@uky.edu University of Kentucky University of Kentucky University of Kentucky, dcain@uky.edu University of Kentucky University of Kentucky, nick.stamatiadis@uky.edu University of Kentucky This paper is posted at UKnowledge. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ktc researchreports/416

TRUCK ROUTE ACCESS EVALUATION Paradise Power Plant Muhlenberg County Site# 1113 Report No. KTC-98-25 "Freight Movement and Intermodal Access in Kentucky" Project No. SPR 98-189 by Kenneth R. Agent with Brian Aldridge Lisa Aultman-Hall David Cain Nicole Lefever Nikiforos Stamatidis Joel Weber UK Kentucky Transportation Center and the Department of Civil Engineering University of Kentucky September 1998

Table of Contents 1. 0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Trucks Routes in Use... 1 3.0 Route Data Collection and Evaluation... 4 3.1 Traffic Operations and Level of Service... 4 3.2 Accident History... 4 3.3 Cross Section Features... 7 3.4 Curvature Features... 7 3.5 Railroad Crossings... 11 3.6 Bridges... 11 3. 7 Sight Distance... 11 3.8 Other Route Features...,... 13 4.0 Route Evaluation and Recommendations... 13 4.1 Problem Truck Miles and Truck Points... 13 4.2 Maintenance Improvement Locations... 13 4.3 Overall Route Rating... 15 Appendices Appendix A: Field Site Visit Dates and Activities Appendix B: Phone Surveys Conducted with Facility

List of Tables Table 1: Route Features and Method of Evaluation... 5 Table 2: Accident Types along Muhlenberg County Truck Route... 7 Table 3: Summary of Problem Truck Miles and Points for Entire Route... 14 Table 4: Interpretation of the Overall Route Rating... 15 List of Figures Figure I: Location of Truck Generating Site... 2 Figure 2: KY 176... 3 Figure 3: US 431... 3 Figure 4: Accident Locations... 6 Figure 5: Lane Widths... 8 Figure 6: Shoulder Widths... 9 Figure 7: Grade Adequacies... 10 Figure 8: Left turn from Western Kentucky Parkway to US 431... II Figure 9: Bridge Locations... 12 Figure 10. Mud Tracked from Haul Road to KY 176... 14 11

1.0 Introduction The Freight Movement and Intennodal Access in Kentucky Study (SPR 98-189) is being conducted on behalf of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). There are two major objectives of the study: evaluation of the access for trucks between intennodal or other truck generating sites and the National Highway System (NHS); and furthering the understanding of freight commodity flows throughout the state. This report summarizes the access evaluation for The Paradise Power Plant facility located in Muhlenberg County in the Pennyrile Area Development District (ADD) and KYTC Highway District # 2. The location of the site is shown in Figure I. Work on other specific sites as well as the freight commodity flow task are on-going and are documented elsewhere. The sites to be evaluated were selected from two existing databases ( a truck facility survey from I 994 and the intennodal facility inventory) based on ADD and KYTC Highway District planner recommendations, geographic location, distance to the national highway system, and the number of trucks accessing the site. Consideration was also made for the freight type handled and transportation modes used. The Paradise Power Plant was recommended by Highway District# 2. The site was visited two times for data collection and video recording as listed in Appendix A. The major facility in the area is the power plant. Reed Materials is located along KY 176 near Drakesboro. The surrounding area is generally rural. A phone survey of the facility manager was conducted early in the study process, and it showed about 120 trucks per day accessing the Paradise Power Plant. However, a 24-hour traffic count taken in August 1998 by KYTC recorded 437 trucks on KY 136 so this volume was used. The total traffic volume was I,943 giving 22.5 percent trucks. The site trucks are generally semi tractor trailers which were five axle coal trucks with a 32-foot trailer. The largest trucks are six axle lowboys. The phone survey information can be found in Appendix B. 2.0 Trucks Routes in Use There is currently only one primary route for trucks to reach the National Highway System. The Paradise Power Plant is located at the west end ofky 176 on the Green River. The trucks travel from an access road to the power plant west on KY 176 (about 3 miles) to US 431 and then travel north to the Western Kentucky Parkway (about 6 miles) which is a total distance of about 9 miles (as shown in Figure 1). There is a distance of about 2 miles from the access road to the end of KY 176 at the power plant. Both KY 176 (Figure 2) and US 431 (Figure 3) are two lane roadways through a rural area except where they intersect in Drakesboro. A few potential problems were listed as a result of the phone survey. The problems noted were: I) the haul road, which is a private road parallel to KY 176, was poorly maintained and there was poor visibility at its intersection with KY 176 for drivers leaving the plant and 2) the bridge on KY 176 near Drakesboro was in need of repair. An additional comment from the survey was that truck speeds contributed to safety concerns.

Figure 1: Location of Truck Generating Site National Highway System Route Facility Access Routes 2

Figure 2: KY 176 Figure 3: US 431 3

3.0 Route Data Collection and Evaluation The route features that were evaluated in this study are shown in Table 1 along with a brief description of the evaluation method. While some of these features require only subjective evaluation by the engineer during site inspection, others required quantitative measurement in order to label the particular point or section as "preferred", "adequate", or "less than adequate" for truck access. The guidelines for labeling a point or section into one of these three descriptive categories are provided in both the interim and final report for this project. In several cases measurements were only taken where subjective evaluation indicated a problem might exist. This was done since "preferred" type sections and points do not contribute to an increase in the problem truck points or miles so there was no need to collect data for those locations. 3.1 Traffic Operations and Level of Service The survey of the users of this site indicated that there were no operational problems or concerns. Observations during the site visit confirmed this opinion. Thus, the route was considered to operate at an acceptable level. No level of service calculations were necessary. 3.2 Accident History In.1997 the Kentucky Transportation Center studied all state-maintained roads throughout Kentucky and determined average truck accident rates for different types of road sections. The three-year period of 1994 through 1996 was used. A critical accident rate was then calculated using the average accident rate for a specific highway type along with an assumed level of statistical significance and exposure (vehicles miles traveled). Two sections along this Muhlenberg County truck route had a truck accident rate higher than the critical rate for that particular highway type. One section was between milepoints 11.458 and 12.082 on US 431. Five truck accidents occurred on this section during the three-year period with a critical rate factor of 1.15. The intersection with KY 176 is at milepoint 11.467. Of the five accidents, three were rear end collisions and two were an opposite direction sideswipe. The other section was on US 431 between mi1epoints 16.609 and 17.484. Six truck accidents occun ed on this section giving a critical rate factor of 1.74. Three of the accidents in this section occurred at milepoint 17.484 which was at the Western Kentucky Parkway. Of the six accidents, four involved a rear end collision while the remaining two involved a same direction sideswipe. Figure 4 shows the locations of all accidents during the years 1994, 1995 and 1996. The two sections with a critical accident rate are identified. A summary of the accidents along the entire truck route (for all roads not just state-maintained roads) is shown in Table 2 for the same three year period. Truck accidents represent a significant portion of the overall accidents along this route. The 18.7 percent of accidents involving trucks compares to 9.0 percent trucks along US 431. Of the 14 accidents, nine involved a rear end collision while two were a same direction sideswipe and two were an opposite direction sideswipe. The fatal accident was an opposite direction sideswipe. 4

Table 1: Route Features and Method of Evaluation Feature Methodology Team Consensus based on Feature Committee Meeting and Draft Type Report Feedback Offtracking Lane Width with formula based Evaluate where observation of Point on wheel and axle spacing trucks indicates possible offtracking - use HIS data and collect in field Max. Safe Speed Ball Bank Indicator Reading Evaluate complete route due to Point on a Curve ease of data collection Grade Speed Reduction Tables with Evaluate where observation of Continuous Percent Grade and Direct trucks indicates speed Observation reduction occurs using HIS data and collect in field as needed Lane Width HIS data and field measurement Review complete route due to Continuous ease of data collection Clear Zone Observation Subjective evaluation Subjective Shoulders HIS data and field measurement Evaluate where HIS data is Continuous available and estimate based on observation elsewhere Pavement Observation Subjective evaluation Subjective Condition Truck Stopping Field measurements Measure only when Point Sight Distance observation indicates possible problem Turning Radii Field measurements and Measure only when Point observations of trucks observation indicates possible problem Accident History Accident data files and KTC Do for entire route Subjective High Truck Accident Report Intersection LOS Traffic counts Only where problems are Point indicated by facility managers Route LOS Traffic counts and travel time Only where problems are Continuous studies indicated by managers RR Crossings Field Observation Evaluate all level crossings Point Bridges KYTC Sufficiency Rating Evaluate all bridges Point 5

Figure 4: Accident Locations (1994-1996) N A Faility l'aidals: 1-2 l'aidals:3-4 l'aidals: 5-9 l'aidals: 10-13 Oitica A:xicm Rlte Fffig-1 /la:sj Fb.ie S:ale 1:B:xlXJ 1.0 0 1.0 20 MIES = 0 axxj 4ffiJ Mlas Sate~S,S:em OIHR:a:l3 6

Table 2: Accident Types along Muhlenberg County Truck Route Non- Truck Accidents Truck Accidents Percent Trucks Fa tal Accidents 0 100.0 Injury 21 5 19.2 InterSection 22 4 15.4 Total 61 14 18.7 3.3 Cross Section Features Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the sections of the route having different widths of lanes and shoulders. While the 12-foot lanes on US 431 are considered "preferred" fortrucks, the 11-foot lanes on KY I 76 are only rated as "adequate". A 0.4-mile section of US 43 I at the Western Kentucky Parkway has a I 0-foot paved shoulder which is considered "preferred". The 1.5-foot paved shoulders on the remaining portion of US 431 and the 2-foot paved shoulder on KY 176 are considered "less than adequate". The clear zone on US 431 is limited (trees, embankments) with a little more clear zone on KY I 76. There are two bridges on US 43 I and one on KY 176 without a full width shoulder. 3.4 Curvature Features There were no curves on the route which would result in offtracking into the opposing lane. There were curve signs with no advisory speed. These curves could be driven at the speed limit with a ball bank reading of less than 12 degrees so no problems related to safe speeds on curves are expected. Grades are considered problematic if they cause trucks to slow excessively. Observations showed there were two grades on US 431 which caused trucks to slow (Figure 7). One section between milepoints I 6.5 and 16.9 could cause a speed reduction of 6 to 10 mph ("adequate" rating) while the other grade around milepoint 13 would cause a reduction of less than 5 mph ("preferred). There were no problem grades on KY I 76 between US 431 and the plant haul road. The turning radius from the Western Kentucky Parkway to US 431 was determined as well as the radius at the intersection of US 431 and KY 176. At the parkway, the turn is made onto a fourlane section with trucks turning typically into the right southbound lane (Figure 8). The left turn from southbound on US 431 to eastbound on KY 176 has a radius of about 75 feet and can be made without crossing into the opposing lane although a few trucks were observed crossing into the opposing lane. The radius has been widened for the right turn from KY 176 westbound to US 431 northbound to allow this turn to be made without crossing into the opposing lane. 7

Figure 5: Lane Widths N A I.EGEN) Fadlity lane Wicth: 11 Foot lane Wicth: 12 Foot R-aght Pa:;g;s A:Jute ( 1\b lane Width Dita ) Sate HghM!y System Scale " 1:roxJO 1.0 0 1.0 20 Mles 2000 0 2000 4000 M:cters Qher Fba1; 8

Figure 6: Shoulder Widths \ N A Paradise LEGEND Facility Shoulder Width: 1.5 Feet Shoulder Width: 2 Feet Shoulder Width: 10 Feet Freight Access Route ( No Shoulder Width Data) State Highway System Other Roads Scale - 1 :80000 1 0 0 1.0 2.0 Miles ~ ~iiiiiiiil~~~-- 2000 0 2000 4000 Meters 9

Figure 7: Grade Adequacies ( \ N A LEGEND Facility Grade Causing Speed Reduction Freight Access Route Scale 1:80000 1.0 0 1.0 2.0 Miles 2000 0 2000 4000 Meters State Highway System Other Roads 10

Figure 8: Left turn from Western Kentucky Parkway to US 431 3.5 Railroad Crossings There was one at-grade railroad crossing on US 431 and one on KY 176. Both crossings had gate protection and no sight distance or surface condition problems were observed. The crossings would be rated as "preferred". 3.6 Bridges The locations of the four bridges are shown on Figure 9. The bridge on US 431 near milepoint 17.5, at the Western Kentucky Parkway, has a sufficiency rating (provided by the Division of Operations of the KYTC) of73.5 (out of a possible 100) which is considered as "adequate". The bridge on US 431 at milepoint 13.3 has a sufficiency rating of 88.6 which is considered "preferred" while the bridge at milepoint 12.4 has a rating of 64.5 which is considered "adequate". The bridge on KY 176 at milepoint 8.5 has a sufficiency rating of 89 which is "preferred". 3. 7 Sight Distance There were no sight distance problems at the intersections of the Western Kentucky Parkway and US 431 and at US 431 and KY 176. The only potential problem would be for trucks exiting the private haul road to the power plant to observe westbound traffic on KY 176. Unloaded trucks would be exiting the haul road. 11

Figure 9: Bridge locations N A Paradise LEGEND Facility Scale 1 :80000 1.0 0 1.0 2.0 Miles II 800023 Bridges - Bridge Number 2000 0 2000 4000 Meiers Freight Access Route State Highway System Other Roads 12.

3.8 Other Route Features Trucks were observed exiting and entering the Western Kentucky Parkway from US 431. Numerous brakelight conflicts were noted for vehicles southbound on US 431 from trucks turning left from the exit ramp to proceed southbound on US 431. Site visits were made after a rain had occurred. Tracking of mud from the haul road onto KY I 7 6 was noted. The pavement condition on US 431 was good. The pavement on KY 176 would be described as poor with numerous patches. 4.1 Problem Truck Miles and Truck Points 4.0 Route Evaluation and Recommendations In order to compare different routes to consider relative urgency of needed route improvements the features rated "preferred", "adequate", and "less than adequate" along a route were normalized for the number of miles, number of points, and number of trucks using the route section. In the case of this Muhlenberg County route, four features (lane width, shoulders, grades, and bridges) that were evaluated quantitatively have sections or points that are considered only "adequate" or "less than adequate." The turning radii at two intersections were borderline but was not included since truck drivers could make the turn without encroaching into other lanes. A section or point that is considered "less than adequate" is weighted two times that of an "adequate" point or section. Sections which are not rated as "preferred" are weighted by length as well as the number of trucks on the section. Table 3 contains the total problem truck miles and total problem points for lane width, shoulders, grades, and bridges along this route. The rating of this route relative to others evaluated will be reported in the final report. 4.2 Maintenance Improvement Locations This type of improvement could be addressed during routine maintenance programs by either the state of county and therefore could improve truck access without requiring major construction or expense. A potential maintenance problem was observed on KY 176 at the haul road. The haul road is not paved and debris is tracked on the road. An observation after a heavy rain found a substantial amount of mud tracked onto KY 176 from the haul road (Figure 10). 13

Table 3: Summary of Problem Truck Miles and Points for Entire Route Feature Road Location Points* Length Trucks (miles) (/day) Lane Width KY 176 Length I 2.7 437 Shoulders US431 WKParkway 2 5.6 437 to KY 176 KY 176 Length 2 2.7 437 Total Bridge ratings US 431 MP 17.5 I 437 US431 MP 12.4 I 437 Total Grade US431 MP 16.5-16.9 I 0.4 437 Truck- miles Truckpoints 437 437 874 1,180 4,894 2,360 7,254 175 TOTAL 874 8,609 *I point for "adequate" and 2 points for "less than adequate" features Figure 10: Mud Tracked from Haul Road to KY 176 14

4.3 Overall Route Rating In order to account for both the subjectively and objectively evaluated route features along truck routes throughout the state, a panel of UK engineers who studied the route and its features either during a site visit or by viewing a video of trucks using the routes rated the overall access on a scale of I through 10. The interpretation for these ratings is shown in Table 4. The route in Muhlenberg County between the Western Kentucky Parkway and Paradise Power Plant (on US 4 31 and KY 17 6) was given an overall rating of 6 indicating that minor improvements could improve the truck access along this route. Table 4: Interpretation of the Overall Route Rating Overall Route Rating Qualitative Interpretation of Rating 1 Trucks should not be using this route 2 Major construction is required to improve this route 3-5 Minor improvements are reguired on this route 6-8 Minor improvements could iml!rove this route 9 Minor problems exist that do not seriously impede truck access 10 Trucks are served with reasonable access 15

Appendices 16

Appendix A: Field Site Visit Dates and Activities January 15, 1998- initial site visit, facility identification, photographs, and video taping May 26, 1998 - field data collection 17

Appendix B: Phone Surveys Conducted with Facility FacilitviD 1113 Facilitv Name Paradise Fossil Plant Location I Citv Drakesboro Countv Muhlenbrg ADD Pennyrile Contact Name David Simms Phone 502-476-3490 Fax 502-476-3493 1. Is the location of your facility on the map correct? 2. Our information shows about.1_,_2,_0, trucks per day access your facility. Is that correct? If not, fill in correct volume. Yes 3. Is the truck traffic to and from your facility seasonal or mostly const,ant? Constant 4. (If truck traffic is seasonal) Is the_ trucks/day for the peak season? 5. What is the most common size truck operating at your facility? 32' Semitrailer, Coal 5-axles 6. What is the largest truck operating at your facility? 6-Axles (lowboy) 7. What type of freight or commodity is shipped, and is incoming and outgoing freight different? (one may be an empty truck) In- Coal90%, rock (limestone) 10%, Out- Fly ash, tri-axle 7:00 a,m.- 3:30p.m., 5 days a week 8. Does the truck traffl<: peak at specific times of the day? (e.g., out in the morning and return in the afternoon) Fly ash 4-axle out 7:00a.m.- 3:30 p,m., 5 days a week 9. What traffic congestion and delay problems along the routes are you aware of, or feel need improvement? Location (route segment, intersection. etc.) Time and Dav of Week Haul road parallel to KY 176 poorly maintained intersection with KY 176. 10. Where do trucks at your facility go to and come from? (This may be an interstate, cities, general direction-n,s,e,w) KY 176 to US 431 to WK Pkwy, (All trucks) (truck depot at Beachmont), ToW. KY mine (Madisonville area) (not Litchfield). 11. Do you have any other problems or concerns along the route you would like us to consider? Leaving plant- poor visibility, bridge near Drakesboro bad repair, Truck speeds contribute to safety concerns, 12. Would you like a copy of the final report (roadway/route evaluation???) Yes NOTES/COMMENTS: 18