NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #1 Open BLPC Meeting January 9, 2013

Similar documents
Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

Introduction. School Overview TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

Agenda. Preliminary Station Footprint High Speed Train Station in the City of Millbrae

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

SCAN Land Use and Transportation Committee Report June 10, 2015

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

This Evening s Agenda. Open House 7:00 7:30 Presentation 7:30 8:00 Community Feedback8:00 9:00 Adjourn

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

Transportation Sustainability Program

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) TNC (Transportation Network Company) Lot on S. Eads Street

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Existing Conditions Belmont Circle Bourne, MA. Belmont Circle Improvements

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Downtown Parking/Wayfinding Study. Review of Recommendations to City Council: January 16, 2018

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

LCPS Valley Service Center

Traffic Engineering Study

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

King Street & Wyman Road Transportation Impact Study & Transportation Demand Management. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR ST. JOSEPH'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION

School Transportation Assessment

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Troost Corridor Transit Study

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

City of Pacific Grove

1701 N. BEAUREGARD STREET NEW WEST END ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (NWEES)

Maine Medical Center Campus-Wide Parking Study

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BETHLEHEM MISSIONS TRUST CAMPUS

Scarborough Transit Planning

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

General Information. No right turn on Tulane. Student Drop-Off Area. Bike Parking

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY. October 19, 2009

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Click to edit Master title style

Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

Information Meeting Transfer Station Options. September 30, 2014

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Re: Sainte-Geneviève Elementary School (2198 Arch Street) Transportation Overview

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

1 On Time Performance

LEGAL DESCRIPTION REZONE PARCEL

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Transcription:

NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #1 Open BLPC Meeting January 9, 2013

It s for the Students! Maintain class size Hold fewer classes in relocatables Minimize travel distance to school

Project Delay and it s impact New school must open in September 2015. 3 months for concept design has become 5. Reducing design period impacts quality. Construction period will be reduced by 2 months. Reduction of construction period impacts cost.

Revised Project Schedule

Resolved at Concept Design January 2013 Location of building on site Overall building height and general building massing General layout of program spaces by floor Location of parent & bus drop off/pick up Location of parking areas & approximate on site/offsite parking count Location of major site amenities Overall landscape/pedestrian circulation concepts Transportation analysis/major off site improvements

Resolved at Schematic Design April 2013 Building design in accordance with educational specifications External elevations/exterior materials/fenestration Landscape plan and site layout Preliminary civil engineering documentation Expect site and building design to be almost identical to what will be built

Resolved during Use Permit process June 2013 Parking count and location Storm water management and quality control Environmental assessment Detailed site and civil engineering design Use permit conditions, eg: TDM, construction procedures plan Off site improvements

Upcoming Open Meetings Date Event Purpose 01/14/13 Gallery Walk Public review of work to date 01/17/13 School/County Board Joint work session 01/24/13 School Board Information item on final concept design 02/07/13 School Board Action item on final concept design

Planning Principles revealed through design workshops 1. Design and enhance large scale open spaces for joint use by the school and community. 2. Design multi-modal transportation options that promote safe, healthy, alternative choices for children, parents teachers, staff and community members. 3. Create and communicate a sense of place, identity and meaning with 21 st century educational purpose

Planning Principles revealed through design workshops 4. Design attractive, appealing indoor and outdoor places that satisfy age appropriate needs for comfort, safety and a sense of belonging. 5. Create a variety of grade-level appropriate play and learning environments that promote physical activity, social engagement and experiential learning. 6. Optimize passive design strategies for energy conservation, sustainable ecologies and projectbased learning opportunities.

Summary of Recommendations

Current On site Parking Current Staff Current Peak Visitors Current % of peak parking demand fulfilled on site WMS 109 125 14 78% ES Average 39 86 21 36%

Estimated Future Students Estimated Future Staff Estimated Future Visitors Estimated Max. Future Parking Demand WMS 1,300 172 29 201 New ES #1 600 81 36 117 TOTAL 1,900 253 65 318 Maximum assumes all future staff and visitors drive and park at the same time.

Accommodate a total estimated parking demand of 274 vehicles through a combination of on site parking spaces and utilization of on street facilities = 86% of peak Total Parking Demand Accommodated Onsite On street WMS 171 150 160 11 21 New ES #1 103 70 80 23 33 On street parking available (approx. 60 on school side of N Harrison, 35 on school side of 36 th Street) On street parking may provide traffic calming Currently 14% of WMS and comparable school staff report using travel modes other than SOV County Master Plan: encourage use of residential on street parking where current utilization is 60% or less

Concept 1.3 160 MS / 90 ES 250 = 78% peak 24 (of 95) on street Concept 2.2 160 MS / 90 ES 250 = 78% peak 24 (of 95) on street Concept 4.2 160 MS / 90 ES 250 = 78% peak 24 (of 95) on street

Data Collection Existing Conditions Intersection Movement Counts 7:00AM to 9:00AM 2:00PM to 6:00PM Cars, HV, Peds, Bicycles Daily Traffic Counts 7 days, 24 hours per day Additional data Parent surveys Student tallies Driveway counts

Existing Conditions Middle School Arrival Operations Middle School Dismissal Operations No Operational Concerns One Movement at LOS E/LOS F

Old Dominion/Edison Middle School Arrival Operations Delay left turns onto Old Dominion Modeling does not demonstrate passing on the right Low volumes left turns would not meet traffic signal warrant (even with expansion) TDG supports County projects; made additional safety recommendations No Operational Concerns One Movement at LOS E/LOS F

Future Trip Generation Assumptions WMS students increase from 950 to 1,300 Elementary School will have 600 future students Estimated Future Vehicle Trips (in and out = 2 trips) Arrival Dismissal WMS 961 Total (259 New) 547 Total (147 New) New ES #1 426 270 Background Growth 3.6% Growth over 7 years

Existing Infrastructure w/future Trips Middle School Arrival Operations F No Operational Concerns One Movement at LOS E/LOS F Two Movements at LOS E/LOS Note: Middle School Dismissal, New ES#1 Arrival and Dismissal no operational concerns

Off-Site Improvements based on transportation studies Turning lanes added at Williamsburg and N. Harrison No left turn from Harrison onto 36 th Street during arrival and dismissal Crossing signal or traffic light at Williamsburg and Kensington Improved pedestrian crossing at Williamsburg and Kensington, including expanded median

Adding Capacity Southbound & Northbound Turn Lanes N Current Lanes N Recommended Lanes Williamsburg Boulevard N. Harrison St 22

Operations Added Turn Lanes and Future Trips (Current Mode Split) N N. Harrison St LEGEND LOS D or better LOS E or worse Williamsburg Boulevard 23

Operations Added Turn Lanes and Future Trips (Rainy Day 1/3) N LEGEND LOS D or better LOS E or worse N. Harrison St Over threshold for LOS D by 1.8 seconds. Williamsburg Boulevard 24

Operations Added Turn Lanes and Future Trips Rainy Day 2/3 N N. Harrison St LEGEND LOS D or better LOS E or worse 55 to 80 second delay Williamsburg Boulevard 25

Improvements at Williamsburg & Kensington

Design Conditions 1. MS arrival from 7:00 to 8:00am. On-site counts in September showed 310 vehicular drop-offs; increased to 604 + 66 potential early drop-offs at ES. 2. MS dismissal from 2:15 to 3:25pm. On-site counts showed 202 vehicular pick-ups; increased to 514 + 0 potential early pick-ups at ES. 3. ES arrival from 8:00 to 9:00am. 194 vehicular dropoffs are predicted. Coincides with higher rush-hour traffic, so this analysis was required for potential impacts to intersections. 4. ES dismissal is not a design condition for traffic, as it is less than MS and doesn t coincide with increased traffic on the street network.

In-person Site Observations of Traffic May 10: arrival & dismissal May 10: soccer field use from 3:30 to 8:00 May 10: evening band concert May 12: soccer field use from 8:30 to 5:15 September 18: (forecast rain day) September 20: arrival & dismissal September 24: back-to-school night October 4: school visitor & parking December 17: arrival (darkest week of school year)

7:09 am 12.17.2012

7:15 to 7:30 am 12.17.2012 7:15 7:18 7:22 7:29

7:31 am 12.17.2012

Peak Traffic 12.17.2012 7:38 7:43 7:50 7:52

7:49 am 12.17.2012

7:53 am 12.17.2012

7:53 am 12.17.2012

7:54 am (5 mins in & out) 12.17.2012

8:10 to 8:25 am 12.17.2012

Field Use Google Maps Fall 2012

Site & Building Concepts

Vignette 1.0 Vignette 2.0 Vignette 3.0 Vignette 4.0 Vignette 5.0 Vignette 6.0

Concept 1 Hillside Concept 2 Hilltop Concept 3 Parallel

Concept 1.1 Concept 1.2 Concept 2.1 Concept 3.1 Concept 3.2 Concept 4.1

Concept 1.3 Concept 1.1 Concept 1.2 Concept 3.1 Concept 2.2 Concept 4.2 Concept 2.1 Concept 3.2 Concept 4.1

Concept 1.3 Concept 2.2 Concept 4.2

CONCEPT 1.3 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN

Level 0.0 Level 1.0 Level 2.0 Level 3.0 CONCEPT 1.3 FLOOR PLANS SHOWING MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITIONS

CONCEPT 1.3 BIRD S EYE VIEW FROM SW

CONCEPT 1.3 MODEL VIEW

CONCEPT 1.3 AERIAL VIEWS FROM COMPUTER MODEL

CONCEPT 2.2 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN

Level 1.0 Level 2.0 Level 3.0 CONCEPT 2.2 FLOOR PLANS SHOWING MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITIONS

CONCEPT 2.2 BIRD S EYE VIEW FROM SW

CONCEPT 2.2 MODEL VIEW

CONCEPT 2.2 AERIAL VIEWS FROM COMPUTER MODEL

CONCEPT 4.2 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN

Level 0.0 Level 1.0 Level 2.0 CONCEPT 4.2 FLOOR PLANS SHOWING MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITIONS

CONCEPT 4.2 BIRD S EYE VIEW FROM SW

CONCEPT 2.2 MODEL VIEW

CONCEPT 4.2 AERIAL VIEWS FROM COMPUTER MODEL

CONCEPT 1.3 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN

CONCEPT 1.4 SKETCH VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 SITE SECTION 3

CONCEPT 1.5 SITE SECTION 2

CONCEPT 1.5 SITE SECTION 1

CONCEPT 1.5 SITE & BUILDING PLAN, GROUND LEVEL

CONCEPT 1.5 SITE & BUILDING PLAN, GROUND LEVEL

CONCEPT 1.5 SITE & BUILDING PLAN, 2 nd FLOOR

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

CONCEPT 1.5 AERIAL VIEWS

40 avg. setback to curb 85 130 105 60 45 45 avg. setback to curb CONCEPT 1.5 SITE & BUILDING PLAN, GROUND LEVEL 60 50