Exploration Architecture Update

Similar documents
Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

Lunar Architecture and LRO

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

NASA Perspectives on the Importance of Reform in Electric Energy Systems Education

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

LLO LLO. = Commercial Missions. = = NASA Commercial Missions. = Military Missions. = Military = NASA Missions LEO LEO. Cargo / (to 2013) (U/PLC)

Lunar Missions by Year - All Countries. Mission count dropped as we transitioned from politically driven missions to science driven missions

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A LUNAR IN-SITU RESOURCE UTILIZATION (ISRU) PROPELLANT SERVICES MARKET:

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

LUNAR DAYLIGHT EXPLORATION Cost Constrained Human and Robotic Exploration Brand Norman Griffin 1 A.M., ASCE

An Overview of CSA s s Space Robotics Activities

Ares I Overview. Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects NASA MSFC. Masters Forum May 14, 2009

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM. Steve Creech Manager Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution August 29, 2017 A NEW CAPABILITY FOR DISCOVERY

The Intermediate Outpost - An Alternate Concept for Human Lunar Exploration

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Architecture Options for Propellant Resupply of Lunar Exploration Elements

Lunar Robotics. Dr. Rob Ambrose, NASA JSC December Dr. Robert O. Ambrose

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Resource Prospector Traverse Planning

Notes: GENERAL DYNAMICS EARLY LUNAR ACCESS [1993]

The Common Spacecraft Bus and Lunar Commercialization

Utilizing Lunar Architecture Transportation Elements for Mars Exploration

Building an Economical and Sustainable Lunar Infrastructure To Enable Lunar Science and Space Commerce

Analysis of Power Storage Media for the Exploration of the Moon

MARS-OZ: A Design for a Simulated Mars Base in the Arkaroola Region

How to Assess Heritage Systems in the Early Phases? Andreas M. Hein

INTERNATIONAL LUNAR NETWORK ANCHOR NODES AND ROBOTIC LUNAR LANDER PROJECT UPDATE

Landing Targets and Technical Subjects for SELENE-2

High Power Solar Electric Propulsion for Human Space Exploration Architectures

Performance Evaluation of a Side Mounted Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle for Lunar Exploration

Moon Exploration Lunar Polar Sample Return ESA Thematic information day BELSPO, 3 July 2012

Ares V Overview. presented at. Ares V Astronomy Workshop 26 April 2008

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

Extending NASA s Exploration Systems Architecture towards Longterm Crewed Moon and Mars Operations

Martin J. L. Turner. Expedition Mars. Published in association with. Chichester, UK

Planetary Surface Transportation and Site Development

Affordable Human Moon and Mars Exploration through Hardware Commonality

MS1-A Military Spaceplane System and Space Maneuver Vehicle. Lt Col Ken Verderame Air Force Research Laboratory 27 October 1999

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Name: Space Exploration PBL

IN DECEMBER 2006, NASA published their initial plan [1] for a

3 DESIGN. 3.1 Chassis and Locomotion

WHAT WE WILL DISCUSS IN THIS VIDEO

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

Lunar Science and Infrastructure with the Future Lunar Lander

IAC-07- A3.I.A.19 A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING PROPELLANT RE-SUPPLY CAPABILITIES

The European Lunar Lander Mission

Abstract #1754. English. French. Author(s) and Co Author(s) Resources in the cislunar marketplace. To follow. No abstract title in French

IAC-10-A5.1.6 A POWER ARCHITECTURE FOR THE ISECG REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. M. Haese ESA, The Netherlands,

Vehicle Reusability. e concept e promise e price When does it make sense? MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Vehicle Reusability

Industrial-and-Research Lunar Base

Taurus II. Development Status of a Medium-Class Launch Vehicle for ISS Cargo and Satellite Delivery

Travel: Detailed Flight Plan

Space Architecture. Master s Thesis Project Jain, Abhishek Dec. 2 nd, 2013

Initial Concept Review Team Alpha ALUM Rover (Astronaut Lunar Utility Mobile Rover) Friday, October 30, GMT

Please visit the stations to provide your input: EV Charging Location Map EV Adoption ZEV Drivers Other Ideas

Building Bridges for Lunar Commerce

Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC Status Report


NASA s Space Launch System Marks Critical Design Review

Development of a Lunar Architecture Simulation Environment for Evaluation the use of Propellant Re-supply

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

RIMRES: A project summary

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop 2014

Transportation Options for SSP

Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Silicon-Germanium Integrated Electronics for Extreme Environments Applied to the Design of a Lunar Hopper

Cygnus Payload Accommodations: Supporting ISS Utilization

Parametric Design MARYLAND

SSC Swedish Space Corporation

Abstract. 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Analysis of Architectures for Long-Range Crewed Moon and Mars Surface Mobility

Lunar and Mars Mission Analysis and Design Using Commercial Launch Systems and the International Space Station

Cooperative EVA/Telerobotic Surface Operations in Support of Exploration Science

Upper Stage Evolution

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

The Role of Electric Propulsion in a Flexible Architecture for Space Exploration

Analysis of Launch and Earth Departure Architectures for Near-Term Human Mars Missions

A Private Commercial Space Company EA02P046V5

Routine Scheduled Space Access For Secondary Payloads

Phoenix Lander Implications on in situ resource utilization for robotic exploration of Mars

ULA Briefing to National Research Council. In-Space Propulsion Roadmap. March 22, Bernard Kutter. Manager Advanced Programs. File no.

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

Plug-in Hardware Concepts for Mobile Modular Surface Habitats

Transcription:

Exploration Architecture Update Doug Cooke Deputy Associate Administrator Exploration Systems Mission Directorate John Connolly Vehicle Engineering and Integration Lunar Lander Project Office March 14, 2007

A Bold Vision for Space Exploration, Authorized by Congress Complete the International Space Station Safely fly the Space Shuttle until 2010 Develop and fly the Crew Exploration Vehicle (Orion) no later than 2014 Return to the Moon no later than 2020 Extend human presence across the solar system and beyond Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program Develop supporting innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures Promote international and commercial participation in exploration NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human presence on the Moon, including a robust precursor program to promote exploration, science, commerce and U.S. preeminence in space, and as a stepping stone to future exploration of Mars and other destinations. March 2007 2

Global Exploration Strategy Use the Moon to prepare for future human and robotic missions to Mars and other destinations Pursue scientific activities to address fundamental questions about the solar system, the universe, and our place in them Extend sustained human presence to the moon to enable eventual settlement Expand Earth s economic sphere to encompass the Moon and pursue lunar activities with direct benefits to life on Earth Strengthen existing and create new global partnerships Engage, inspire, and educate the public March 2007 3

NASA s Exploration Roadmap 1st Human Orion Flight 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Science Robotic Missions Lunar Robotic Missions 7th Human Lunar Landing Mars Expedition Design Lunar Outpost Buildup Surface Systems Development Early Design Activity Lunar Lander Development Ares V Development Earth Departure Stage Development Orion Production and Operations Orion Development Ares I Development Initial Orion Capability Commercial Crew/Cargo for ISS ISS Sustaining Operations Space Shuttle Ops SSP Transition March 2007 4 4

The Moon the First Step to Mars and Beyond. Gaining significant experience in operating away from Earth s environment Space will no longer be a destination visited briefly and tentatively Living off the land Human support systems Developing technologies needed for opening the space frontier Crew and cargo launch vehicles (125 metric ton class) Earth ascent/entry system Orion Conduct fundamental science Astronomy, physics, astrobiology, historical geology, exobiology Next Step in Fulfilling Our Destiny As Explorers March 2007 5

Components of Program Constellation Earth Departure Stage Ares V - Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Orion - Crew Exploration Vehicle Lunar Lander Ares I - Crew Launch Vehicle October 2006 6

Typical Lunar Reference Mission MOON Vehicles are not to scale. 100 km Low Lunar Orbit LSAM Performs Lunar Orbit Insertion Ascent Stage Expended Low Earth Orbit Earth Departure Stage (EDS) Expended Service Module Expended EARTH EDS, LSAM Orion Direct Entry Land Landing October 2006 7

How We Plan to Return to the Moon Orion A blunt body capsule is the safest, most affordable and fastest approach Separate Crew Module and Service Module configuration Vehicle designed for lunar missions with 4 crew Can accommodate up to 6 crew for Mars and Space Station missions System also has the potential to deliver pressurized and unpressurized cargo to the Space Station if needed 5 meter diameter capsule scaled from Apollo Significant increase in volume Reduced development time and risk Reduced reentry loads, increased landing stability and better crew visibility March 2007 8

How We Plan to Return to the Moon Project Ares The safest, most reliable and most affordable means of meeting crew requirements is a system derived from Space Shuttle components Capitalizes on human rated systems and existing facilities The most straightforward growth path to later exploration launch needs 131 metric ton lift capacity required to minimize on-orbit assembly and complexity increasing mission success A clean-sheet-of-paper design is too expensive and risky The current Shuttle system lifts 100 metric tons to orbit on every launch but 80 metric tons is the Orbiter Ares I Ares V March 2007 9

Building on a Foundation of Proven Technologies - Launch Vehicle Comparisons - 120 Overall Vehicle Height, m 90 60 30 Upper Stage (1 J-2X) 127Mt LOx/LH 2 5-Segment Reusable Solid Rocket Booster (RSRB) Lunar Lander Earth Departure Stage (EDS) (1 J-2X) 226Mt lb LOx/LH 2 Core Stage (5 RS-68 Engines) 1410Mt LOx/LH 2 5-Segment 2 RSRB s Crew Lander S-IVB (1 J-2 engine) 110Mt Lox/LH 2 S-II (5 J-2 engines) 450Mt LOx/LH 2 S-IC (5 F-1) 1770Mt LOx/RP Space Shuttle Ares I Ares V Saturn V Height: 56m Gross Liftoff Mass: 2040Mt 25Mt to LEO Height: 98m Gross Liftoff Mass: 910Mt 22Mt to LEO Height: 109m Gross Liftoff Mass: 3310Mt 53Mt to TLI 65Mt to TLI in Dual- Launch Mode with Ares I 131Mt to LEO Height: 111m Gross Liftoff Mass: 2950Mt 45Mt to TLI 119Mt to LEO March 2007 10

Lander Architecture Ascent Module (minimized for mass) Landed Mass (Cargo, Habitat, Mobility, etc Maximized for Mass) Design Goals Minimize Ascent Module mass Minimize Descent Module mass Maximize landed payload mass Simplify interfaces Move functions across interfaces when it it makes sense Point of Departure Only 11

NASA Exploration Lunar Activities addressing Themes Human Civilization Global Partnerships Scientific Knowledge Economic Expansion Exploration Preparation Public Engagement 12

13

High Priority Lunar Exploration Sites North Pole + 9 13 Oceanus 1 + Procellarum 17 +Aristarchus Plateau 3 12 14 3 15 17 + Rima Bode 6 16 24 Mare Tranquillitatis + 21 5 11 20 16 Mare Smythii + Central Farside Highlands + Orientale Basin Floor + 7 Luna Surveyor Apollo + South Pole Near Side South Pole-Aitken Basin Floor + Far Side March 2007 14

Permanent Sunlight? South Pole: Three areas identified with sunlight for more than 50% of lunar day South Pole One zone receives 70% illumination during dead of southern winter Lit areas in close proximity to permanent darkness (rim of Shackleton) North Pole North Pole: Three areas identified with 100% sunlight Two zones are proximate to craters in permanent shadow Data taken during northern summer (maximum sunlight) Data obtained during southern winter (maximum darkness) Data obtained during northern summer (maximum sunlight) 15

Shackleton Crater Rim Size Comparison The area of Shackleton Crater rim illuminated approximately 80% of the lunar day in southern winter, with even better illumination in southern summer (Bussey et al., 1999) Note: Red Zone = 750 m x 5 km (personal communication with Paul Spudis) 16

Shackleton Crater Rim with Notional Activity Zones Potential Landing Approach To Earth Observation Zone South Pole (Approx.) Power Production Zone Resource Zone (100 Football Fields Shown) Landing Zone (40 Landings Habitation Zone Shown) (ISS Modules Shown) Monthly Illumination (Southern Winter) 50-60% 60-70% >70% 0 5 km Potential Landing Approach 17

o o o Outpost Build Up Year 0-5 Starts 6 month increments KEY Crew/Cargo Lander Solar Power Unit Unpressurized Rover Surface Mobility Carrier Habitation Power Storage Unit Logistics ISRU Module Point of Departure Only Not to Scale 18

Lunar Architecture Framework Point of Departure Human lunar missions will be used to build an outpost at a polar site The ability to fly human sorties and cargo missions with the human lander will be preserved Initial power architecture will be solar with the potential augmentation of nuclear power at a later time Robotic missions will be used to: Characterize critical environmental parameters and lunar resources Test technical capabilities as needed The ability to fly robotic missions from the outpost or from Earth will be a possible augmentation 19

NASA Implementation Philosophy The US will build the transportation infrastructure and initial communication & navigation and initial EVA Open Architecture: NASA will welcome external development of lunar surface infrastructure The US will perform early demonstrations to encourage subsequent development External parallel development of NASA developed capabilities will be welcomed 20

Open Architecture: Infrastructure Open for Potential External Cooperation Lander and ascent vehicle EVA system CEV and Initial Surface capability Long duration surface suit Power Basic power Augmented Habitation Mobility Basic rover Pressurized rover Other; mules, regolith moving, module unloading Navigation and Communication Basic mission support Augmented High bandwidth ISRU Characterization Demos Production Robotic Missions LRO- Remote sensing and map development Basic environmental data Flight system validation (Descent and landing) Lander Small sats Rovers Instrumentation Materials identification and characterization for ISRU ISRU demonstration ISRU Production Parallel missions Logistics Resupply Specific Capabilities Drills, scoops, sample handling, arms Logistics rover Instrumentation Components Sample return ** US/NASA Developed hardware 21

Forward Work (January July 07) Using current architecture as a point of departure Develop global view and mature architecture Coordinate lunar exploration plans among international and commercial partners and continue to look for other collaboration opportunities Refine campaign and architecture concepts and also element hardware concepts Update and baseline ESMD Requirements Develop Mars Reference Mission Continue to engage academia, the private sector, and other stakeholders in defining a sustainable program of exploration 22

Thank you! March 2007 23