Heavy Truck Safety. Heavy Truck Safety. Luke W. Loy U.S. DOT-FMCSA

Similar documents
CHAPTER 6: MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY PROGRAM

Florida Highway Patrol Commercial Vehicle Enforcement. Captain Bryant Gay

Motorcoach Tire & Weight Issues

Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Requirements

BASIC 5: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

A R T I C L E S E R I E S

summary report (DRAFT)

SPECIAL HAULING PERMITS

DOT AND FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER LAW LESTER RORICK PRESIDING JUDGE CITY OF PASADENA

CSA What You Need to Know

Department of Transportation aka. FMCSA

Reduced Stopping Distance: Why the Mandate?

DOT AND FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER LAW

National Conference of State Legislators December 1, 2011 Tampa, Florida

June Safety Measurement System Changes

New Entrants Safety Education Seminar for Georgia Motor Carriers CHAPTER 3

Commercial Motor Vehicle Marking. And Identification Regulations

Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance Level VI Program 2016 Inspection Report. For Inspections in CY 2013 and CY 2014

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

CSA Overview Commercial Vehicle Basics. Presented November 3, 2011 for Portable Sanitation Association International By David Medeiros

A R T I C L E S E R I E S

CSA State of the Union

Electronic Logging Devices Enforcement and Technology

PRESENTED BY SCOTT RANDALL HOGAN TRANSPORTS, INC.

Commercial Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (CVII) Program

BASIC 6: CARGO LOADING & SECUREMENT

Safety Compliance Manual

Requirements for Agricultural Operations on Wyoming Highways. Wyoming Highway Patrol Commercial Carrier Section

December 1, Southern States Energy Board. Joint Meeting of the Radioactive Materials. Waste Transportation Working Group

CSA 2010: Vehicle Management; Part II

MOTORHOME REGULATIONS. length given)

Policy Research CENTER

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Stoneridge, Inc. Application for an Exemption

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT YEARS OF TRANSPORTATION REGULATION

Is Your Court Putting Millions of State $$$$ at Risk?

CSA Changes: December 2012

Load Rating for SHVs and EVs

Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA)

2014: Regulation Update. A Review of CSA, HOS Update on CARB Regulations

PRISM. Performance and Registration Information Systems Management. IRP Annual Meeting 2016 Oklahoma City, OK May 2 4

STATE. State Sales Tax Rate (Does not include local taxes) Credit allowed by Florida for tax paid in another state

Training Police Officers in Investigating Large Vehicle Crashes CT s effort to improve CT s FMCSA s Safety Rating

Traffic Safety Facts 2000

FEDERAL SIZE REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES

CROSSROADS SAFETY CONSULTING

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

Statement before the New Hampshire House Transportation Committee. Research on primary-enforcement safety belt use laws

Automatic On-Board Recording Devices (AOBRDs)

Hours of Service (HOS)

Section 04: Weight Limitations. Minnesota Trucking Regulations

Alaska (AK) Passenger vehicles, motorcycles 1959 and newer require a title ATV s, boats and snowmobiles do not require a title

Section 12: Record Keeping Requirements. Minnesota Trucking Regulations

Motorcycle Safety Program Assessments

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Unsafe Condition Involving Commercial Motor Vehicles Affected by

Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA)

Linda Goodman. June 15, 2016

Commercial Vehicle Pre-Clearance and Compliance Best Practices. RANDY HANSON International Road Dynamics

12/11/2017. ELD Update. Understanding ELDs and How They Will Affect Your Business. Compliance. Critical Juncture. Benefits of ELDs.

CSA Compliance, Safety & Accountability. Training By Patti Gillette, Director of Safety Colorado Motor Carriers Association

FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

NWPPA 2016 Engineering & Operations Conference and Trade Show April 13, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1

STRUCTURAL BUILDING COMPONENTS MAGAZINE December 2004

What I ll talk about

Snow Removal Laws December 2010

Snow Removal Laws November 2016

Vehicle Size & Weight Enforcement Updates

Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Rule

Mile Hi: Compliance and Safety Insights. Colin Heupel

TRS - Trailer Roll Stability

Highway Safety FOR MISSOURI LOG TRUCKS. Missouri Department of Transportation Motor Carrier Services

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Research Note. DOT HS October 2017

CARRIER SAFETY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (CSMS) METHODOLOGY

Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Application for an Exemption from Great Lakes Timber Professionals Association.

Virginia Loggers Association

Orientation Safety Test

COUNTY DIVISIBLE LOAD PERMITS ISSUED IN 2013 PERMIT FEES PERMITS?

FAST Transportation Bill, ELD Mandate & Safety Refresher. Presented By Justin Cunningham Director of Safety The Cline Wood Agency

Truck Enforcement and Screening Station (TESS) Status Briefing

Snow Removal Laws September 2014

Why First Offenders Should Use Ignition Interlock Devices. J.T. Griffin Mothers Against Drunk Driving VP for Public Policy

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS July 2002

Driver Qualification Handbook

OUTLINE: MVR PSP WHAT IS IT? WHAT INFORMATION IS ON IT? WHY DO WE NEED THIS INFORMATION? HOW CAN I GET IT? HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?

Connecticut PHONE: (860) :00 A.M.-12:30 P.M. 1:00 A.M.- 3:15 P.M. EASTERN TIME. Legal Limits. Connecticut

In this Think Safety, we will

SECTION 1 - APPLICANT INFORMATION. 1) Legal Name: 2) Mailing Address: 3) Physical Address (if different from mailing address):

Roadside Inspections

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

37 th International Forum on Traffic Records & Highway Safety Information Systems Charlotte, North Carolina

IOWA GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR OVERSIZE LOAD PERMIT

Bus Industry Safety Council Summer Meeting 2018 Baltimore, MD June 26-27, 2018

The Impact of Primary Enforcement Laws on Seat Belt Use. NCSL Injury Prevention Meeting

Traffic Safety Facts. Alcohol Data. Alcohol-Related Crashes and Fatalities

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSED

The RAMCUP Act of 2017

final report Minnesota Truck Size and Weight Project Minnesota Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

DOT HS October 2011

Transcription:

Heavy Truck Safety Heavy Truck Safety Luke W. Loy U.S. Luke DOT-FMCSA W. Loy U.S. DOT-FMCSA

SYNOPSIS Nationwide CMV Vehicle OOS Rate - Approx. 20% Heavy Truck Inspection Project OOS Rate - Approx. 37% Bad brakes (and heavier weights) lead to longer stopping distances Permitting vehicles to carry loads in excess of their GVWR Accident reporting forms need to capture weight data/permit data Intermodal Containers as non-divisible loads may be carrying loads in excess of their GVWR - OOS Rate approx. 35% Communication: CMV inspectors, Permit office, Road office, Bridge office Carriers operating within your state should be operating safely Or..perhaps not operating 2

CSA Compliance Safety Accountability The FMCSA CSA program is an important initiative to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of FMCSA s enforcement and compliance program to achieve the agency s mission to reduce commercial motor vehicle (CMV) crashes, fatalities, and injuries. 3

CSA BASIC and Weight Violations (circa 2010) New CSA 2010 Safety Measurement System (SMS) began including roadside inspection Weight violations (392.2W) In CSA 2010 Operational Model Test Weight violations one of the most frequently cited violations uploaded to FMCSA (~440k/ 2 years) No FMCSA federal equivalent regulations for weight violations Lack authority to address and pursue weight issues State Enforcement Issue

Recommended Option to Address CSA Issue Recommended Option: Short term Remove Weight violations from CSA calculation Recommended Option: Long term Partner with FHWA Perform analytical study in cooperation with FHWA to more formally establish the relationship of S/W and safety

Commercial Vehicle Weight Enforcement Activities 2008 2009 2010 All Weighs 200,419,382 182,256,996 198,564,690 Weigh-in-Motion 119,826,305 116,176,399 118,025,789 Static Weighs 80,593,077 66,080,597 80,538,901 Semi-portable Scales 357,502 373,073 285,484 Fixed Scales 79,644,702 65,182,174 79,703,573 Portable Scales 590,873 525,350 549,844 Violations 555,168 489,975 478,576 Axle Weight Violations 248,813 220,631 216,735 Gross Weight Violations 120,384 116,291 114,171 Bridge Weight Violations 185,971 153,053 147,670

PERMITS 2008 2009 2010 Total 5,215,724 4,528,654 4,836,663 Non-Divisible 3,693,248 3,285,801 3,510,301 Non-Divisible Annual Permits 322,288 298,805 303,230 Divisible Trip Permits 489,712 369,906 341,737 Divisible Annual Permits 710,476 574,142 683,395

American Standard Roadside Inspection Levels Level 1 - Driver and Vehicle Level 2 - Driver and Vehicle Walk Around Level 3 - Driver & Credential Inspection

Weight citations with inspections (2009)

2009 CMV Inspections with Weight Violations For comparison 2009 Truck OOS Rate 21.6%

Why so few overweight trucks inspected? Different State Agencies weigh trucks and inspect trucks State Policies on performing Level 2,3 inspections on overweight trucks Inspector safety considerations?

Heavy Vehicle Data Collection Effort CVSA/FMCSA/FHWA Purpose: To gather data to determine, impact heavier weights have on a vehicle s structural components, motor carrier safety violations, and safety. Duration: January 15 th, 2012 January 15 th, 2014 Vehicle Selection: a heavy vehicle should be included: 1.) When it is weighed and found to be over the allowable: (a) axle weight; and/or (b) axle group weight; and/or (c) gross vehicle weight for the roadway on which it is operating. OR 2.) When operating under a special permit for weight. 13

2012-2013 Live Data 7842 Inspections 30 States Illinois-1887 CA-1119 2868 Vehicle Inspections with Weight Citations

General Inspection Information State No. CMV Inspections No. CMV OOS CMV OOS Rate 6 months 231 123 53.25% 1 year 4684 1618 34.54% 18 months 7842 2788 35.55%

What is the Safety Culture of the Inspected Carriers?

Vehicle Maintenance Basic OOS Rate Above 80 Below 80 No Rank No. CMVs No. OOS OOS Rate No. CMVs No. OOS OOS Rate No. CMVs No. OOS OOS Rate 1062 606 57.06% 4223 1102 26.10% 2568 1087 42.33% Crash Basic Comparison Among States Above 60 Below 60 No Rank No. CMVs No. OOS OOS Rate No. CMVs No. OOS OOS Rate No. CMVs No. OOS OOS Rate 885 280 31.64% 2143 520 24.27% 4816 1988 41.28%

Combination CMV 6 month CMV Distribution # CMVs OOS Rate Yes 1229 45.40% No 246 41.87% 12 month Yes 3473 38.27% No 1211 23.86% 18 month Yes 5937 37.56% No 2230 29.29%

Permitted CMV Distribution # CMVs OOS Rate 6 month Yes 258 32.56% No 1127 47.41% 12 month Yes 394 35.79% No 4290 34.43% 18 month Yes 747 34.94% No 7095 35.62%

OOS Violations (All CMVs) Category Number CMVs OOS Rate Brakes 1016 12.96% Brake Adjustment 627 8.00% Tires 275 3.51% Suspension 50 0.64% Wheels 31 0.40% Other 789 10.06% Total 2788 35.55%

Violation Violation Count OOS Violations OOS Rate 392.2W 254 100 39.37% 392.2-SLLEWA1 1110 388 34.95% 392.2-SLLEWA1 714 271 37.96% 392.2-SLLEWA3 168 73 43.45% 392.2-SLLEWG1 321 118 36.76% 392.2-SLLEWG2 179 85 47.49% 392.2-SLLEWG3 268 142 52.99% TOTAL 3014 1177 39.05%

Heavy and Overweight Stopping Distance Testing 2012 5 axle tractor semitrailer

Max Weight 5 Axles Florida, Wyoming, & Michigan up to 122,000 on 5 axles. Allowed NY & NJ Allowed up to 126,000 on 5 axles. Massachusetts & Connecticut up to 128,000 on 5 axles. Allowed Mississippi Allows more weight depending on axle spacing's & routes. Wisconsin Allowed up to 142,000 on 5 axles. Legend 92,000 96,000 98,000 100,000 102,000 104,000 106,000 108,000 112,000 116,000+

Heavy Overweight Brake Testing Impact on brake performance with increasing load Impact on brake performance with brake degradation on tractor and trailer.

5 axle tractor trailer combination (80,000 lb) 2 brakes OOS before vehicle/vehicle combination is placed OOS (20% x 10) = 2.0

FY 2012 Testing Reduced Stopping Distance Tractor 2011 NHTSA requirement 60 mph 250 feet New brakes/drums/tires Performed complete - FMVSS 121 burnish 20 mph, 60 mph stopping distance tests Best Effectiveness 2 brake wheel ends out on trailer 2 brake wheel ends out on tractor

2010 South Carolina DOT Pilot Program for Overweight Containers (09-10) Container inspections 1,762 to 2,778 Vehicle related violations 1,604 to 3,446 Vehicle violations not related to increased loads (90K- 2009, 100K 2010) Brake Violation Increase 279 929 (233%) (their calculation) Tire violation Increase 238 347 (58%) Increase in brake violations likely related to increase in level one inspections.

2010 South Carolina DOT Pilot Program Review and Recommendations Memorandum Terminate Pilot on November 1, 2010 Expand Pilot to all international shipping containers Allow Axle weights of 20K, Tandem 48K, Tri - 55K Signed by SC Secy of Transportation 10/27/10

SYNOPSIS Nationwide CMV Vehicle OOS Rate Approx. 20% Heavy Truck Inspection Project OOS Rate Approx. 37% Bad brakes (and heavier weights) lead to longer stopping distances Permitting vehicles to carry loads in excess of their GVWR Accident reporting forms need to capture weight data/permit data Intermodal Containers as non-divisible loads may be carrying loads in excess of their GVWR OOS Rate approx. 35% Communication: CMV inspectors, Permit office, Road office, Bridge office Carriers operating within your state should be operating safely Or..perhaps not operating 30

FMCSA Contact Luke Loy Sr. Engineer Vehicle & Roadside Operations Division - FMCSA Luke.Loy@dot.gov 31