Japan proposal for. Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle

Similar documents
Categorization of Light N1 Vehicles. 58 th GRB (2 4 September 2013) JASIC

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values

China Proposal for Micro-Van and Micro-Truck

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~

Review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation in Japan (Review of UN R41-04 Limit Value)

The trend of noise regulation in Japan

The reason why Japanese proposal Stage3 has [ ] JASIC

China is finding common solutions for Sub-categories of M1 and N1 Categories

Study on Pass-by Noise Testing Methods Incorporating Urban Driving Conditions Test method of N2 category

Additional Sound Emission Provisions. Additional Sound Emission Provisions

World Light Duty Test Procedure

Study of Fuel Economy Standard and Testing Procedure for Motor Vehicles in Thailand

Torque Influence on C3 category tyres

Testing of particulate emissions from positive ignition vehicles with direct fuel injection system. Technical Report

Comparison of vehicle categories under Japanese regulations with ECE

Subject: ACEA proposal for Euro 6 OBD and Euro 6 PN limit for gasoline direct injection engines.

VEHICLE EMISSIONS. ITF-SEDEMA workshop in Mexico City Norbert Ligterink

Real Driving Emissions

Additional Sound Emission Provisions in the new European type approval method for exterior noise of road vehicles

Proposals for amendments to Regulation No. 63

CAR FUEL ECONOMY. Automobile Industry Perspective. I V Rao Executive Advisor, Engineering Maruti Suzuki India Limited

Proposal for a Limit Value Reduction Scenario for Road Vehicles compatible with the German National Traffic Noise Prevention

Development of the Japan s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure

Economic and Social Council

Engine encapsulation. A synergic approach to exterior noise and CO 2 emissions reduction. Brussels, 18th December 2012 Maurizio Mantovani - Autoneum

Analysis of Swiss vehicle database for ECE-R51/02 and proposals for noise limit values from EC, Ger, Jap

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - New Boxer L1 Summary - 09/2016

Study of Pedestrian s fatal accidents (vs. motor vehicles at low speed) in Japan

S&M - Product - Light Commercial Vehicles. New Daily CNG. Product Contents. S&M - Product Light Commercial Vehicles

CORRELATION OF STATIONARY AND PASS-BY NOISE LEVELS & DEVELOPMENT OF NOISE STANDARDS FOR IN-USE VEHICLES by

WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I

77 th GRPE, 6-8 June 2018 Agenda item 13, HD FE Harmonization. OICA HD-FE TF Y. Takenaka

WLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle

WLTC Validation test 1 ~ Progress report by JARI ~

P R E S E N T A T I O N O F

Piaggio Commercial Vehciles. Product Range Europe

On-road emission measurements with PEMS on a MERCEDES-BENZ ATEGO Euro VI N2 heavy-duty truck

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to Regulation No. 51 (Noise of M and N categories of vehicles)

Real Driving Emissions and Test Cycle Data from 4 Modern European Vehicles

Validation 1b Test Results on Indian Vehicles. WLTP/DHC Teleconference 22 nd March 2012

Sprinter New product features 2016

THE DRIVING EMISSIONS TEST

India 1999 Emission Standards based on Euro 1 MVEG-A test cycle w/40 sec. idle before sampling

A CO2 based indicator for severe driving? (Preliminary investigations - For discussion only)

Test results of Validation test 1b and Cycle modifications

Potential solution to reduce PM pollution in a big city

Economic and Social Council

Fuel Efficiency Norms for Heavy Duty Vehicles. Presented By: Sumant Kumar

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre. VECTO - Overview VECTO Workshop Ispra, November, 2018

Toyota s Hybrid Technology. Yoshihiro Onomura General Manager, Planning & Administration Dept. Hybrid Vehicle Engineering Management Div.

ACEA Tyre Performance Study

WLTP-DHC Rev.1

Introduction of Current Clean Diesel Technology and Subjects for Passenger Car, Application for Thailand

Effectiveness of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Validated by Analysis of Real World Driving Data

Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision)

Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS. Work allocated to TUG Description of possible approaches

Real Driving Emissions of a GPF-equipped production car

The new Sprinter panel van

Future Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For a Better Environment. Diesel WG Report. September 25, 2000

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

Official Journal of the European Union

Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions

Sulphur impact on exhaust emissions. 20.Dec.2016 JAMA fuels and lubricants committee

Proposal for amendments to UN R16: Mandatory fitting of safety-belt reminder

Progress at LAT. October 23, 2013 LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS

Research on Chest Injury Criteria

MULTIPURPOSE VEHICLES

The new Sprinter chassis cab

Evaluation of the suitability to European conditions of the WNTE control zone concept as set out in the OCE GTR

Economic and Social Council

JAMA comments on the draft EU RDE 3rd package regulations 25/08/2016 JAMA

-focusing on effects of sulfur on latest aftertreatment devices-

Economic and Social Council

Revision of ASEP Considerations for Future Steps Enhancement of the presentation from Germany

Applicability for Green ITS of Heavy Vehicles by using automatic route selection system

Vehicle Performance. Pierre Duysinx. Research Center in Sustainable Automotive Technologies of University of Liege Academic Year

IEA RETD Francisco Carranza Nissan Europe Bonn, 26 Oct 2012

Economic and Social Council

Regulation No Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement pollution control devices for power-driven vehicles

SPECIFICATION. CRANE Specification. CARRIER Specification

Guideline for. Motor Truck and Dog Trailer Combinations up to 50 tonnes total mass. in Queensland

Presentation to RDE stakeholder group

ANNEXES. to the COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION

Details RDE Legislation Europe. Speaker: Nikolas Kühn June 27th ECMA

Taiwan Regulatory Experience Present to Asian Vehicle Emission Control Conference On January 31,2001 at Bangkok, Thailand.

The analysis of the PEMS measurements of the exhaust emissions from city buses using different research procedures

IAPH Tool Box for Port Clean Air Programs

COPERT 4 v7.1. Dimitrios Gkatzoflias Chariton Kouridis Giorgos Mellios Leon Ntziachristos

CEMA position on draft braking regulation, 4 June 2008 ENTR/F1/ /rev16

Economic and Social Council

Meeting CRIA - ETRMA October 26, 2010

CEMA PT16 N09Rev2. Reference document: ENTR_F1_ _rev 16 v Article / clause Original text Proposal from CEMA Rationale and

Tyre noise limits of EC/661/2009 and ECE R117: Evaluation based on sold tyres in the Netherlands

ECE R41, R51 NOISE on motorcycles and passenger cars. Y. Shirahashi S. Yonezawa JASIC Noise-sub committee

NORDIC VEHICLE CONFIGURATION FROM VIEWPOINT OF FUEL AND TRANSPORT ECONOMY, EMISSION REDUCTION AND ROAD WEAR IMPACT

EURO3 Stage for motorcycles: Derivation of equivalent limits for the WMTC driving cycle. P. Bonnel, G. Martini, A. Krasenbrink

WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria

HDV CO2 emission certification 1 st meeting of the Editing board

FOR YOUR BUSINESS CONTENTS TCO2 CHAMPION BEST-IN-CLASS POWER BEST-IN-CLASS FUEL RANGE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Transcription:

Japan proposal for 参考資料 3 Informal document GRB-59-09 (59 th GRB, 28-30 January 2014, agenda item 3 (b)) Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle: GVM 2.5 ton PMR (power to mass ratio) of GVM 35kW/t Engine capacity 660cc d value<1,100mm 59 th GRB (28-30 January 2014) JASIC Japan s proposal is already included into the informal document GRB-59-04 submitted by the GRB Expert Group on R51. 1

2 FOR BASIC UNDERSTANDINGS Light Motor Vehicle consists of Light N1 Vehicle and Light M1 Vehicle. Light N1 Vehicle consists of Flat Front type and Front Engine type. This proposal from Japan is only for Flat Front type of Light N1 Vehicle. Light Motor Vehicles (GVM 2.5ton, Engine capacity 660cc, etc) Light N1 Vehicles Light M1 Vehicles Front Engine type Flat Front type PMR of GVM > 35kW/t PMR of GVM 35kW/t & d value<1,100mm

FOR BASIC UNDERSTANDINGS (additional) Light Motor Vehicles (GVM 2.5ton, Engine capacity 660cc, etc) 6.2.2.1 Veh.Cat Vehicles used for the carriage of goods Phase1 Phase2 Phase3*/ M1 PMR 120kW/t 72 70 68 Light M1 Vehicles Light N1 Vehicles Veh.Cat Vehicles used for the carriage of goods Phase1 Phase2 Phase3*/ N1 GVW 2.5t 72 71 69 GVW > 2.5t 74 73 71 Front Engine type (=PMR of GVM > 35kW/t) Japan s proposal is already included into the informal document GRB-59-04 submitted by the GRB Expert Group on R51. Japan s proposal Flat Front type (=PMR of GVM 35kW/t & d value<1100mm) 3

4 CONTENTS 1. Japanese Regulations for Light N1 Vehicles 2. Bed size (loading space) 3. Usage of the Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles 4. Sales of Light N1 Vehicles in Japan 5. Noise Levels of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles under R51-03 Test Method 6. Characteristics of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles 7. Reasons Why the Noise Level of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles is High 8. Data of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle 9. Example of the vehicle similar to Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle sold in Europe 10.The situation of conformity to the UN/EU Regulations of Flat Front N1 Vehicle 11.Maximum speed of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle 12.Exhaust emission of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle (compare with EURO5) 13.The past sales of Light Motor Vehicles in Europe 14.The case of sales to Europe by using the chassis of Japanese Light Motor Vehicle in the past

5 1. Japanese Regulations for Light N1 Vehicles Light N1 Vehicle is defined as follows. (1) Exterior dimensions Length 3.40m, Width 1.48m, Height 2.00m [Enforcement Regulations for Road Vehicles Act] Article 2 Attached Table 1 Max 2.00m Max 1.48m Max 3.40m

6 1. Japanese Regulations for Light N1 Vehicle (2) Engine capacity Engine capacity 660cc [Enforcement Regulations for Road Vehicles Act] Article 2 Attached Table 1 (3) Maximum loading capacity (payload) Maximum loading capacity 350kg [Light Motor Vehicle Inspection Activity Regulations] 3-3-67 (4) Maximum seating capacity Maximum seating capacity 4persons [Examination Standards for New Type Vehicle] Annex 2-26-3 (5) bed size (loading space) bed size 0.6m 2 [Classification of Use of Motor Vehicles, etc.] 4-1-3

7 2. Bed size (loading space) Japanese regulation requires that bed size of Light N1 Vehicles is 0.6m 2 or more. There is no regulations stipulating the maximum bed size, while in practice it is as close as possible to the exterior dimensions of the vehicle. 1.41m 1.475m Bed size example of Flat Front Light N1 vehicle L1920mm x W1410mm ; 2.7m 2

3. Usage of the Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles 48% of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles are used in agricultural area only. 64% of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles are driven near such area (farm or factory), far from urban area. Others Shopping Leisure (20%) Delivery for business (16%) n=617 In farm (48%) In factory (16%) 64% Driven near farm and factory area, far from urban area Investigated by JAMA at 2011 8

3. Usage of the Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles The mileage in one run Most users of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles use the vehicle within their neighborhood only, not for long-distance travel. Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle n=289 under 10km N1Truck except Light Motor Vehicle n=789 10-30km 30-50km over 50km Counts of usage on highway Most users of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles do not use the vehicle on highway, because it is hardly possible to run at about 100km/h. Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle n=289 0 20 40 60 80 100% several times /year no use N1Truck except Light Motor Vehicle n=791 1 time or more /week 1 time or more /month 0 20 40 60 80 100% Investigated by JAMA at 2011 9

10 4. Sales of Light N1 Vehicles in Japan The number of sales of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles is only about 15% of the total sales of Light Motor Vehicles. N1 PMR 35 304,400 (15.4%) PMR(GVM)>35 89,600 (4.5%) 1,979,400 The number of Light Motor Vehicle sales in 2012 M1 1,585,400 (80.1%)

5. Noise Levels of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles in the New Test (R51-03) The noise levels of Flat Front Light N1Vehicles are higher than those of Front Engine Type by about 2 3 db and are almost the same as trucks with GVM > 2.5 t. 78 76 74 R51-03 db(a) 72 70 68 2 3 db 66 Light N1 (Flat Front) Light N1 (Front Engine Type) M1-derived N1 (Front Engine Type) Trucks with GVM > 2.5 t (Flat Front) 64 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Vehicle mass at R51-03 test (kg) 11

6. Characteristics of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles Flat Front Light N1 vehicles are configured differently from Front Engine type vehicles (so-called M1-derived N1 vehicles) and have the same configuration as N1 vehicles (trucks) with GVM > 2.5 t. Front Engine type Light N1 Vehicle (GVM 2.5t) engine Flat Front Vehicle (Engine under the seat) Flat Front type Different type N1 truck (GVM > 2.5 t) Same type engine engine 12

13 6. Characteristics of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles In Flat Front type vehicles, differently from Front Engine type vehicles, the engine and front tyre are located below the occupant to ensure large cargo space. Therefore, d value, which expresses the positional relation between occupant and front tyre can be used to classify these two vehicles. d value: Horizontal distance between the front axle and the driver s seat R-point Front Engine type (M1-derived N1) Flat Front type (commercial N1) d value

6. Characteristics of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles -Comparison of d Values Between Flat Front type and Front Engine type Vehicles- In Front Engine type vehicles, since it is necessary to install the steering wheel, pedals, etc. between front wheel and driver s seat, their d values need to be at least 1,100 mm even in small vehicles. In Flat Front type vehicles, to ensure large cargo space, it is necessary to locate the driver s seat as forward as possible, i.e., above the engine and front wheel. Thus, their d values are no more than 1,100 mm. 1600 1400 iq Front Engine type d value (mm) 1200 1000 800 Smart 2 Light Motor vehicles d value = 1,100 Flat Front type and Front Engine type vehicles can be separated at d value 1,100 mm. 600 400 Flat Front type 200 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 Overall length (m) 14

6. Characteristics of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles -Status of Categorization Based on the d Value and PMR (GVM)- Using the d value < 1,100 mm and PMR (GVM) 35, most Flat Front light N1 vehicles can be separated from other N1 vehicles. 55 50 45 40 660cc < Engine Capacity Bongo (PMR < 35) Front Engine Light N1 Town Ace PMR (GVM) 35 30 PMR = 35 25 20 15 Flat Front Light N1 d value = 1,100 European small M1 & M1-derived N1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 d value (mm) 15

16 7. Reasons Why the Noise Level of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles is High Since engines of Flat Front Light N1 vehicles are exposed, the engine radiated sound and air intake sound are emitted directly outside the vehicle. As a result, the vehicle external noise level and the engine sound contribution of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles are higher than those of Front Engine type vehicles. Sound emission in R51-03 test Overall level 72-73 db Flat Front Light N1 vehicle Engine Air intake sound Exhaust sound Tire Front Engine type Overall level about 70 db Contribution of each sound source of the vehicle external noise in average vehicles (amount of energy)

7. Reasons Why the Noise Level of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles is High Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle is required driving force at low speed, considering the usage environments such as load capacity (high load), high gradient, muddy ground, etc. These situations demand higher gear ratio than M1 vehicle, as a result, Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles run with extra high engine speed making louder engine noise. 25 1st over all gear ratio 20 15 10 1st 2nd 2nd 3rd (i) th gear ratio of M1 is same as (i+1) th of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle. 5 3rd 4th 5th Light M1 Vehicle Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle Gear ratio comparison in 5-speed transmission cars(light M1 vs. Flat Front Light N1) 4th 5th 17

8. Data of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle does not meet the preference of European market, given that the vehicle s performance such as payload, maximum speed, etc, are limited. Items Regulation for Light Motor Vehicle Flat Front Piaggio Porter* Light N1 Vehicle PI engine CI engine Vehicle length mm 3400 3395 3390 3390 Vehicle width mm 1480 1475 1395 1395 Vehicle height mm 2000 1735-1905 1730 1730 Bed size m 2 0.6 2.53-2.7 2.5 2.5 Bed size length mm 1700-1940 1760 1760 Bed size width mm 1240-1415 1270 1270 Bed size height mm 235-1235?? Wheel base mm 1900-2450 1810 1810 Axle track mm 1290-1310 1210 1210 Number of seats - 4 2-4 2 2 Payload kg 350 350 550-700 550-700 GVM kg 1140-1510 1500 1500 Engine capacity cc 660 656-658 1300 1200 Max power kw 33-37 52 47 Max torque Nm 59-63 105 140 Max speed Km/h 104-107 130 130 Number of sales '2012 304,400 4,400 Price 4,300-10,800 - * Piaggio Porter does not meet the Light Motor Vehicle regulation in Japan. 18

9. Example of the vehicle similar to Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle sold in Europe Piaggio Porter From internet homepage 19

20 10. The situation of conformity to the UN/EU Regulations of Flat Front N1 Vehicle Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle can not be sold in Europe since it is not adaptable to many regulations. Regulation Conformity Reasons Emission levels R15 No The maximum speed of the test procedure is 120 km/h. But, Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle cannot trace this speed. So, running with wide open throttle is required. Air-conditioning system EEC2006/40/EC No New air-conditioning system is necessary. Future Regulation Pole side impact performance No The informal document was submitted in the last GRSP (2013.12). The document will be discussed in next GRSP (2014.5). The requirements are as follows. [13X]00series test vehicle speed is below; 32 +/- 1km/h (vehicle width >1500mm) 26-0/+6 km/h (vehicle width 1500mm) [13X]01series test vehicle speed is 32 +/- 1km/h In case that 01series becomes mandatory, Light N1 Vehicle cannot comply with 01 series due to narrow space between frame and seats. The following countermeasures are necessary, if Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle shall comply with European requirements.. Install drastically changed cooling system etc. for running at higher maximum speed. Develop a completely new air conditioner system. No countermeasures to comply pole side impact regulation with 01 series due to narrow space between frame and seats.

21 11. Maximum speed of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles have very high gear ratio aiming at usage in farm area. As a result, the maximum speed of the vehicle is about 105km/h. The lower maximum speed makes great influence to the exhaust emission test result and utility on highway. Maximum speed calculated with "S" rpm and over all gear ratio "S" : Rated rotational engine speed at maximum power Names of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicles Engine power "S" rpm Over all gear ratio Diameter of tire (mm) Maximum speed (km/h) SUZUKI CARRY 37kw/5700rpm 5.625 (5th:1.000, final:5.625) 550mm (145R12) 105 DAIHATSU HI-JET 37kW/5700rpm 5.586 (5th:0.838, final:6.666) 550mm (145R12) 106 HONDA ACTY 33kW/5500rpm 5.364 (5th:0.861, final:6.230) 550mm (145R12) 104 MITSUBISHI MINICAB 35kW/6000rpm 5.842 (5th:0.852, final:6.857) 550mm (145R12) 107

12. Exhaust emission of Light N1 Vehicles (compared with EURO5) Light N1 Vehicle is adjusted to emission regulations for four-wheel vehicles in Japan, however, it it is very difficult to conform Light N1 Vehicles to EURO5 (exhaust emission), because Light N1 Vehicles cannot run at 120km/h. Therefore wide open throttle which causes severe condition in the exhaust emission test is required during running the test cycle. Vehicle speed (km/h) mode test EURO5b (NEDC) 100 Europe (NEDC) Limit Value (PI engine) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 N1 1305kg N1 1306-1760kg Time (second) 120km/h Vehicle speed (km/h) (g/km) CO THC NMHC NOx PM 1.000 0.100 0.068 0.060 0.0045 1.810 0.130 0.090 0.075 0.0045 Japan (JC08) 4.02-0.05 0.05 0.005 Note: Since the test mode is not the same, a simple comparison is not possible. 100 Japan (JC08) Idling test CO(%) Time (second) HC (ppm) EURO5 0.3 - Japan 2.0 500 Range of measured values of Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle mode test Idling test (g/km) CO THC NMHC NOx PM CO (%) HC (ppm) Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle (JC08) 1.05-1.15-0.025-0.05 0.025-0.05 - Light N1 Vehicle 0.2-0.3 200-300 22

23 13. The past sales of Light Motor Vehicle in Europe Light Motor Vehicle is not sold and the type approval has not been granted in Europe so far, because of utility, sales-ability, etc. The vehicle with maximum speed of about 105km/h does not fit to Europe traffic flow, so Light N1 Vehicle will not be sold in Europe.

14. The case of sales to Europe by using the chassis of Japanese Light Motor Vehicle in the past It was necessary to improve the vehicle performance in order to sell in Europe, so engine capacity was modified from 660cc to 1000cc. Daihatsu Cuore 989cc M1 (Name at Japan : Mira) Sales year: 2007-2012 End of sales Suzuki Super Carry 970cc N1 Sales year: 1986-1993 End of sales 24

Summary With regard to the sub-category and limit values for Flat Front Light N1 vehicles, we propose the following: 6.2.2.1 Veh.Cat Vehicles used for the carriage of goods Phase1 Phase2 Phase3*/ GVW 2.5t 72 71 69 N1 GVW>2.5t 74 73 71 6.2.2.2.6 For vehicle types of category N1 having a maximum technically permissible laden mass of less than or equal to 2.5 tons, a PMR of GVW of less than or equal to 35 kw/t and a horizontal distance d between the front axle and the driver s seat R-point of less than 1100 mm, the limits of the vehicle types of category N1 having a maximum technically permissible laden mass above 2.5 tons apply. (excerpt from GRB-58-17-Rev.1) 6.2.2.1 (same as the above) Japan s proposal is already included into the informal document GRB-59-04 submitted by the GRB Expert Group on R51. 6.2.2.1.5 For vehicle types of category N1 having a maximum technically permissible laden mass of less than or equal to 2.5 tons, the engine capacity not exceeding 660 cc and the power-to-mass ratio (PMR) calculated by using the maximum technically permissible laden mass not exceeding 35kW/t and a horizontal distance "d" between the front axle and the driver's seat R point of less than 1100 mm, the limits of the vehicle types of category N1 having a maximum technically permissible laden mass above 2.5 tons apply (excerpt from GRB-59-04 ) 25

END 26