78th TRB 99 Session 440

Similar documents
TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

Reconsideration of Tyre- Pavement Input Parameters for the Structural Design of Flexible Pavements

Improved Performance Evaluation of Road Pavements by Using Measured Tyre Loading. James Maina and Morris De Beer CSIR Built Environment, South Africa

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING HIGHER AXLE MASS LIMITS FOR AXLES FITTED WITH WIDE BASE TYRES

July 10, 2007: 14h15: - Session 2c - Infrastructure

Impact of Environment-Friendly Tires on Pavement Damage

Performance Based Lab Tests to Predict Pavement Fatigue

TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, Texas

A NEW ERA OF OVERLOADING CONTROL IN SOUTH AFRICA

Towards Quantifying Horizontal Stresses of Free-Rolling Pneumatic Rubber Tyres on Road Surfacings

Journal of Testing and Evaluation. Relative pavement performance for dual and wide-base tyre assemblies using a finite element method

Analyzing Effect of Tire Groove Patterns on Hydroplaning Speed

- New Superpave Performance Graded Specification. Asphalt Cements

CNG Fuel System Integrity

Truck Traffic Impact Analysis

METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

Status of the first experiment at the PaveLab

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Structural Considerations in Moving Mega Loads on Idaho Highways

Implementation and Thickness Optimization of Perpetual Pavements in Ohio

Rutting of Caltrans Asphalt Concrete and Asphalt-Rubber Hot Mix. Under Different Wheels, Tires and Temperatures Accelerated

Compressive and Shear Analysis of Rubber Block Under Large Strain

Analysis of Design of a Flexible Pavement with Cemented Base and Granular Subbase

Effect of wide specialty tires on flexible pavement damage

Goodyear Articulated Dump Truck Radials. Mobility, Traction, Smooth Ride. Durable Construction. Customized Compounding

APPENDIX C CATEGORIZATION OF TRAFFIC LOADS

EFFECT OF HEAVY VEHICLES TYRE PRESSURE ON FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS

Tyre Endurance/Low Pressure Test

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Darwin-ME Status and Implementation Efforts_IAC09

Development of long life structural asphalt

Accelerated Pavement Tester

SIERRA 2016 TRUCK TIRES

LCV/PICKUP BIAS TYRES

Loading effects of heavy trucks and autonomous vehicles. Prof. Pauli Kolisoja Tampere University of Technology Finland

Damage Factor Assessment through Measuring Direct Response of Asphalt Pavement due to Heavy Loading

CHAPTER 159. NEW PNEUMATIC TIRES

Handout Activity: HA487

EFFECTS OF DUAL VERSUS SUPER SINGLE TRUCK TIRE ON FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE; A MECHANISTICAPPROACH

DEPARTMENT OF FOREST WORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING GEORG-AUGUST-UNIVERSITY GÖTTINGEN CONTACT PRESSURE ALLOCATION UNDER BOGIE AXLES

Numerical modelling of the rutting and pavement response with non-uniform tyre/pavement contact stress distributions

Motor Vehicles Working Group (MVWG)

Tire 16 inch 225/75R inch 255/60R 18

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

BFGoodrich Commercial Truck Tire REFERENCE CHART. January 2009

HVTT15: Methodology for estimating road wear costs of heavy vehicles on a road network

TRUCK & BUS BIAS TYRES

} Rev.1/Add.52/Rev.2/Amend.2

TIRE PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE Just the Facts!

Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670

Torque Influence on C3 category tyres

Skukuza Airport Airfield side Flexible Pavements: PCN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ThePeople s RepublicofChina

Assessment of pavement damage

ThePeople s RepublicofChina

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Evaluation of Pile Setup using Dynamic Restrike Analysis in Alabama Soils

Fuel System Integrity

TANZANIA STANDARD MEDC 9 (3861) P 2

SRSA limited warranty Policy and Procedure

SALIENT FEATURES 5 straight Rib design Wider Shoulders Sipes on main ribs

Aircraft Tyres. Richard Skiba. Skiba, R. (1999). Aircraft Tyres: Differences Between Aircraft and Automotive Tyres, Pacific Flyer, September.

STEERING SYSTEM Introduction

USV Ultra Shear Viscometer

Goodyear Off-The-Road Tyres. Product Brochure 2016.

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

Pavement Management Index Values Development of a National Standard. Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian

Calitron Calibration Laboratory, U1: 207, Kohinoor Arcade, Tilak Chowk, Nigdi, Pune, Maharashtra

Racing Tires in Formula SAE Suspension Development

THE NETHERLANDS (N E D E R L A N D) COMMUNICATION

Young Researchers Seminar 2009

TEST REPORT FOR: Product Design Group Inc. Elevation Manual Wheelchair 115 kg, 253 lb

Performance Tests of Asphalt Mixtures

2015 TYRE RANGE 2016

Draft Indian Standard PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND METHODS OF TEST FOR WHEELS FOR PASSENGER CARS/MINI GOODS CARRIERS (First Revision of IS 9436)

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.108/Rev.1/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.108/Rev.1/Amend.2

New tyres Pilot Sport R

SHS. Caged Ball LM Guide Global Standard Size Model SHS. Point of Selection. Point of Design. Options. Model No. Precautions on Use

TRUCK TIRE CATALOG 2018

10-1 Tyres and wheels

Influence of Vehicle Speed on Dynamic Loads and Pavement Response

ENGINEERED FOR PRECISION SEEDING PERFORMANCE

BIAS CONSTRUCTION. Provide impact resistance Distribute shock loads over entire body Transitional components from casing to tread

REHABILITATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR HAUL ROADS ASSOCIATED WITH A WIND FARM DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.105/Rev.2/Amend.5 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.105/Rev.2/Amend.5

Procedia Engineering 00 (2009) Mountain bike wheel endurance testing and modeling. Robin C. Redfield a,*, Cory Sutela b

CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA

MEDIUM COMMERCIAL TIRE

When Poor Aircraft Maintenance Costs Lives Ms Cathy Teague Manager: Airworthiness Company: South African Civil Aviation Authority

PATTERN DIGEST

Everything Rides on It

Unit HV04K Knowledge of Heavy Vehicle Chassis Units and Components

Assessment of pavement damage

ROLLER BRAKE TESTING. Chair Chris Loose ATA

NODIA AND COMPANY. Model Test Paper - I GATE Machine Design. Copyright By Publishers

Goodyear Emergency Vehicle Tires

FIRESTONE TRUCK & BUS

Transcription:

ICAP 97 78th TRB 99 Session 440 Latest Developments on Tyre Road Surface Interface Stress Measurements Using the 3-D Cell (PP99-3486) Morris De Beer () Louw Kannemeyer (SANRA Ltd)

(1st Reference: 8th ICAP 97- Seattle, USA ICAP 97 Stress - In - Motion (SIM)N, Transportek, South Africa

ICAP 97 RUTTING

ICAP 97 Longitudinal Flow of Asphalt

ICAP 97 Fatigue Cracking and aging

ICAP 97 SURFACE DISINTEGRATION

ICAP 97 TIRES

ICAP 97

ICAP 97

ICAP 97

% OF TYRE PRESSURE 25 ICAP 97 20 Average: 620 kpa (1974) 15 10 Average: 733 kpa (1995) 5 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 TYRE INFLATION PRESSURE (kpa) FIGURE 1a Tyre inflation pressure distributions in South Africa (1974-1995)

Heavy vehicles: Axle Loads > 7 000 kg Survey: 1995 ICAP 97 1.2% 9.7% 38.5% 13.8% 3.6% 33.2% 9.00-11.00-20 11.00-R20 11.00-R22.5 12.00-R22.5 275/80-315/80 R22.5 385/80-445/65 R22.5 FIGURE 1b Distribution of heavy truck tyre types in South Africa

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) ICAP 97 Direction of travel TYRE ON HVS (or Vehicle) VRSPTA X Y Pavement Surface 1 2 3 4 5 6 Computer set-up Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 SMOOTH TYRE - Z DIRECTION (CREEP SPEED) (JUNE 1994) LOAD 20kN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 VRSPTA PIN NUMBER FIGURE 2 Schematic layout of VRSPTA system

VEHICLE-ROAD SURFACE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER ARRAY (VRSPTA)

315/80 R22.5 HVS TYRE ON VRSPTA

425 /65 R22.5 HVS TYRE ON VRSPTA

VRSPTA PIN OUTPUT (NEWTON) ICAP 97 600 500 400 300 200 100 Data Regression 0 0 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 VOLTAGE FIGURE 3 Laboratory calibration data of VRSPTA pins

17 mm 15 mm ICAP 97 Effective Area = 250,28 mm 2 Direction of tyre movement Support pins Instrumented pins FIGURE 4 Effective Diamond Shaped Area used for the contact stress calculation in VRSPTA

VRSPTA MEASURED LOAD (kn) 120 100 80 Tyre Type VI TRAFFIC SPEED (3.39-4.38 m/s) ICAP 97 60 40 20 r 2 = 0.979 Std. Error of Y. = 4.3 kn 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 HVS APPLIED LOAD (kn) FIGURE 5 Accuracy of the VRSPTA relative to HVS applied load (random error)

ICAP 97

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS, q (kpa) 11.00 x 20 14 ply smooth HVS Tyre ICAP 97 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 830 630 520 620 AVERAGE (1974) 400 500 600 700 800 900 TYRE INFLATION PRESSURE, p (kpa) FIGURE 10 Average vertical contact stress vs inflation pressure MAXIMUM 95 P 90 P 80 P 50 P

ICAP 97

ICAP 97 VRSPTA Mark III

CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 1600 1400 Tyre Load = 18 kn INFLATION PRESSURE:: 420 kpa 520 kpa 620 kpa 720 kpa ICAP 97 1200 Tyre width: 220 mm 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PIN NUMBER ACROSS VRSPTA FIGURE 11 Maximum vertical stress at CONSTANT LOAD and various inflation pressures

CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Tyre Load = 49 kn Tyre width: 220 mm INFLATION PRESSURE: 420 kpa 520 kpa 620 kpa 720 kpa ICAP 97 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PIN NUMBER ACROSS VRSPTA FIGURE 12 Maximum vertical stress at CONSTANT LOAD and various inflation pressures

CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 1600 INFLATION PRESSURE = 420 kpa ICAP 97 1400 1200 WHEEL LOAD: 20kN 30kN 40kN 50kN 1000 800 600 400 200 Tyre width: 220 mm 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PIN NUMBER ACROSS VRSPTA FIGURE 13 Maximum vertical stress at CONSTANT INFLATION PRESSURE at various loads

CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 INFLATION PRESSURE = 620 kpa WHEEL LOAD: 20kN 30kN 40kN 50kN Tyre width: 220 mm ICAP 97 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PIN NUMBER ACROSS VRSPTA FIGURE 14 Maximum vertical stress at CONSTANT INFLATION PRESSURE and various loads

CONTACT STRESS (kpa) Tyre Load = 20 kn ICAP 97 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 TYRE INFLATION PRESSURE: 420 kpa 520 kpa 620 kpa 720 kpa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PIN NUMBER OF VRSPTA FIGURE 16 Maximum vertical stress of tyre with tread grooves at CONSTANT LOAD and various inflation pressures

CONTACT STRESS (kpa) ICAP 97 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 INFLATION PRESSURE = 520 kpa TYRE LOAD (kn): 42 30 26 20 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PIN NUMBER OF VRSPTA FIGURE 17 Vertical stress of tyre with tread grooves at CONSTANT INFLATION PRESSURE and various loads

% CUM FREQUENCY 10.00 X 20 14 PLY TYRE WITH TREAD ICAP 97 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 TYRE LOAD: 14 kn 17 kn 31 kn 40 kn 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 22 kn INTERVAL MIDPOINT CONTACT STRESS (kpa) FIGURE 19 Cumulative frequency of maximum vertical stress

ICAP 97 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 94 296 452 560 644 705 750 781 804 816 817 808 793 764 724 674 606 519 407 252 73 213 508 677 771 827 860 881 894 902 906 906 910 909 905 905 899 889 878 860 832 794 727 616 438 171 96 440 606 677 699 711 713 713 722 722 718 724 724 724 727 729 732 730 728 724 726 724 714 686 613 424 125 190 565 728 795 812 825 825 825 831 832 828 837 835 833 832 837 839 837 833 827 824 822 813 794 742 574 235 182 437 591 665 695 712 721 727 729 732 733 733 734 732 734 733 732 728 726 717 708 681 616 465 219 94 327 478 570 674 695 724 773 754 773 795 765 783 772 723 726 670 582 514 362 148 110 216 291 352 397 415 421 415 376 339 283 206 129 50 MEASURED VERTICAL CONTRACT STRESS VALUES FIGURE 25d Patch area = 74 028 mm 2 Typical measured tyre contact patch

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 1200 TYRE TYPE I (HVS SMOOTH) (11.00 X 20, 14 Ply) ICAP 97 1000 800 600 Inflation Pressure: 400 kpa 600 kpa 800 kpa 400 10 20 30 40 50 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 26a Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) TYRE TYPE II (HVS - WITH TREAD) (11.00 X 20, 14 Ply) 1600 1500 ICAP 97 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 Inflation Pressure: 800 kpa 600 kpa 400 kpa 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 26b Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 2280 2260 2240 2220 2200 2180 2160 2140 2120 TYRE TYPE III (AIRCRAFT TYRE) Inflation Pressure: 1448 kpa ICAP 97 2100 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 26c Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 3000 2500 2000 TYRE TYPE IV (315/80 R22.5) Inflation Pressure: ICAP 97 1200 kpa 1000 kpa 800 kpa 600 kpa 400 kpa 1500 1000 500 20 40 60 80 100 120 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 26d Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 2400 2200 2000 1800 TYRE TYPE V (425/65 R22.5 - WIDE BASE) Inflation Pressure: 1200 kpa 1000 kpa 800 kpa 600 kpa 400 kpa ICAP 97 1600 1400 1200 1000 20 40 60 80 100 120 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 27a Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 2400 2200 2000 1800 TYRE TYPE VI (425/65 R22.5 - R160AZ WIDE BASE) ICAP 97 Inflation Pressure: 1200 kpa 1000 kpa 800 kpa 600 kpa 400 kpa 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 20 40 60 80 100 120 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 27b Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

VERTICAL CONTACT STRESS (kpa) 2200 2000 1800 TYRE TYPE VII (425/65 R22.5 - R160BZ - WIDE BASE) Inflation Pressure: 1200 kpa 1000 kpa ICAP 97 1600 1400 1200 800 kpa 600 kpa 400 kpa 1000 800 20 40 60 80 100 120 SINGLE TYRE LOAD (kn) FIGURE 27c Maximum vertical stress vs tyre load

ICAP 97 DEPTH (mm) 0 50 200 360 470 610 ASPHALT STABILIZED LAYERS SELECTED LAYER RIVER SAND LAYER IN SITU FERRICRETE FIGURE: 28 Pavement structures evaluated with the HVS

Radial Distance (mm) ICAP 97 1 300 600 100 0 Non-Uniform Vertical Stress Depth (mm) 0 40 Tyre Edge Lateral stress CL 200 1 300 FIGURE: 29 Axi-symmetrical Finite Element Model used in this study

TYPE I CL 520 kpa (Vertical) ICAP 97 II 520 kpa (Vertical) III 520 kpa (Vertical) IV 520 kpa (Vertical) 260 kpa (Inward Shear) V 520 kpa (Vertical) 260 kpa (Outward Shear) FIGURE: 30 Load/Contact Stress Idealizations used for the analysis in this study

LC ICAP 97 Rib 3 Rib 1 Rib 2 Rib 4 Rib 5 TYPE VI - TYRE CENTRE (Vertical and lateral) Rib 1 Rib 2 Rib 3 Rib 4 Rib 5 TYPE VII - TYRE EDGE (Vertical and lateral

ICAP 97

ICAP 97

ICAP 97 Pseudo-Energy under non-uniform contact stress conditions (Symplectic Engineering Corporation, USA)

ICAP 97 Colour maps of Shape distortion (Symplectic Engineering Corporation)

ICAP 97

ICAP 97 VRSPTA Mark III

Light Passenger Vehicle: Vertical Contact Stress

Light Passenger Vehicle: Lateral Contact Stress

Light Passenger Vehicle: Longitudinal Contact Stress

ICAP 97

ICAP 97

ICAP 97

Deflectograph Truck (80kN,650 kpa): Vertical Contact Stress

Deflectograph Truck (80kN,650 kpa): Lateral Contact Stress

Deflectograph Truck (80kN,650 kpa): Longitudinal Contact Stress

% Cumulative Frequency 100 DEFLECTOGRAPH (OCTOBER 1998) Test 038-z ICAP 97 80 60 40 20 690 kpa (Rear) 600 kpa (Front) 520 kpa (Design) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Measured Tire Contact Stress (kpa) Tyre Front Left Front Right Rear Left OuterRear Left InnerRear Right OuterRear Right Inner Inflation Pressure 600 kpa 600 kpa 690 kpa 690 kpa 690 kpa 690 kpa

ICAP 97 N1 Mantsole Weighbridege

ICAP 97

Maximum axle load legally allowed on South African Roads from 1996 Type of axle Single axle (steering) Single axle (nonsteering) No of tyres per axle Axle Mass (kg) 2 or 3 7 700 (7 700) 76 2 or 3 8 000 (7 700) 78 Single axle 4 or more 9 000 (8 200) 88 Tandem axle 4 or more 18 000 (16 400) 88 ICAP 97 Load per Axle (kn)* Tridem axle 4 or more 24 000 (21 000) 78,3 ( ) Previous legal load limits * g = 9,8 m/s 2

100 kn Axle WHEEL LOAD 25 kn 25 kn 25 kn 25 kn Road Category [TRH4 (1996)] Percentile Values (%) Contact Stress (kpa) Load Radius (mm) D 50 660 110 C 80 865 96 B 90 975 90 A 95 985 90 RECOMMENDED (INTERIM) TYRE CONTACT STRESSES

% Cumulative Frequency 100 DEFLECTOGRAPH (OCTOBER 1998) Test 038-z ICAP 97 80 60 40 20 690 kpa (Rear) 600 kpa (Front) 520 kpa (Design) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Measured Tire Contact Stress (kpa) Tyre Front Left Front Right Rear Left OuterRear Left InnerRear Right OuterRear Right Inner Inflation Pressure 600 kpa 600 kpa 690 kpa 690 kpa 690 kpa 690 kpa