NEW YORK STATE 2017 PROCESSING PEA CULTIVAR TRIAL REPORT

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson

PGRO Variety Trials Results Vining Peas

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

Trial Report: Supersweet Corn Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

Report to the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission Title: Green Bean Breeding and Evaluation

Concord Fruit Thinning: Using Vine Biology and Mechanized Management to Address Market Demands in New York

Trial Report: Bell Pepper Variety Evaluation Spring 2017

2016 Processing Tomato Guide

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

I~I. Horticulture Series No. 631

Predicting Soybean Reproductive Stages in Virginia

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Information for New Table Grape Trial West Madison Agriculture Research Station Table A. Susceptibility to:

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

2012 Dry Edible Bean Variety Trials, Scottsbluff and Mitchell Ag Labs Jim Schild, Extension Educator Robert Hawley, Extension Technician

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon.

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

From field to yield. January 7, 2016

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Postemergence Weed Control in Green Pea

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

Forage Harvester Evaluation

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA W. H. Gay - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

2014 Nebraska Dry Edible Bean Variety Trials, Jim Schild, Extension Educator Robert Hawley, Extension Technician Gary Stone, Extension Educator

Varietal Trials Results

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Hard Red Spring Wheat J.A. Anderson, G.L. Linkert and J.J. Wiersma

EVALUATION OF CARROT CULTIVARS AND BREEDING SELECTIONS TO IDENTIFY RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR BLIGHTS,

Forage Harvester Evaluation

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

In the Texas High Plains

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWIN FALLS COUNTY 2013 SILAGE CORN VARIETY TRIALS. Steven L. Hines 1 ABSTRACT

Kentucky Silage Corn Hybrid Performance Report: 2010

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

Hybrid Performance from Male-Sterile and Pollinator Inbred Onion Lines

National Groundnut Cultivar Evaluation 2017

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Watermelon Research Report 2011 On-Farm Watermelon Survey

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

KERN FIELD CROPS. Kern County 1031 S. Mt. Vernon Avenue Bakersfield, CA

In the Texas High Plains

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

factsheet Field Sprayer Calibration Introduction Pre-Calibration Checklist Using a Calibration Bottle

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

Florida MDR 98 Peanut 1

2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Pumpkin Germplasm Evalua1on

Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

Selecting Hybrids Wisely. Bob Nielsen Purdue University Web:

Project Title: UCCE Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2003

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Why calibrate? Calibrating your spray equipment

2018 COTTON VARIETY TESTING AND ON-FARM RESULTS

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

2005 OHIO POTATO GERMPLASM EVALUATION REPORT

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.

Section 4: Wheat Varieties

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

Soybean Variety Performance Test Results. Wheat Tech Research & Development Division

To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

Selecting Hybrids Wisely

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

Intrastate, Early Yield, and Malt Barley Variety Performance

Project Title: Developing Stink Bug Thresholds for Late Maturity Group Soybeans on the Upper Gulf Coast. Beaumont, TX

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2017 Central and South Texas

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Sumagic (Uniconazole) for Growth Control of Ornamental Kale (Brassica oleracea Nagoya Mix )

Calibration of Chemical Applicators Used in Vegetables1

December Purdue Corn and Soybean Performance Trials

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2010

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED ***

Corn Yield Trials 2012

Ontario Winter Wheat Performance Trials

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

Transcription:

NEW YORK STATE 2017 PROCESSING PEA CULTIVAR TRIAL REPORT James Ballerstein - Research Support Specialist, Horticulture Section New York State Agricultural Experiment Station - Cornell University, Geneva, New York Stephen Reiners Professor and Chair, Horticulture Section New York State Agricultural Experiment Station - Cornell University, Geneva, New York PROCEDURE AND MATERIALS Location: NYS Agricultural Research Farm, Geneva - soil type silt loam. Tillage Conventional. Fertilizer: broadcast 400 lb/a of 8-14-21 and worked in. Planter Modified Hege 80 (cone type). Planting Date 4/28. Picking started on 6/20 and we finished on 7/8. Herbicide Raptor, Thistrol, Assure and Basagran mix post plant 4/28. Plot Size: 7 rows by 30 ft. Row Width: 6 inches, Row length: 30 ft. In-row Spacing: All cultivars were adjusted (seed planted) to 100 germination. Our processor has asked us to shoot for 600,000 plants per acre for early, 570,000 for second early and 550,000 plants per acre for the rest). Insecticide none. Experimental Design Randomized split block design, 4 replications (3 replications were harvested and another was left for demonstration). Model TG4EI Integrating Texturegage measure for maturity. The objective of this trial was to compare a number of normal leaf and afila type pea varieties for yield and other quality characteristics. This was accomplished in cooperation with the pea processor in New York in an attempt to find new, higher quality, and disease resistant varieties that are adapted to our climate and soil conditions. Evaluation of processed product was held on 11/5 for processing and seed company representatives. Yield of seven rows by 5 feet per replication (35 Row feet) was obtained by pulling the plants and hand picking the pods. Two harvests were made if possible to plot yield increase and also tenderometer reading increase. A target tenderometer value of 110 was used for the final harvest. A stationary sheller was used to remove berries from the harvested pods. Tenderometer readings were taken on each replication and averaged for the report. Pea berries were hand sieved with Seedburo hand testing screens. See following table for details. Table 1. size diameters. Diameter of circular Opening in MM (inches) Size Will not pass through Will pass through 1 6.35 (16/64) 7.1 (18/64) 2 7.1 (18/64) 7.9 (20/64) 3 7.9 (20/64) 8.7 (22/64) 4 8.7 (22/64) 9.5 (24/64) 5 9.5 (24/64) 10.3 (26/64) 6 10.3 (26/64) 11.1 (28/64) Temperature and moisture Conditions Soil conditions were decent at planting but a hard rain shortly afterwards created crusting. A crust buster was used to lightly scratch the soil but smaller seeded cultivars seemed to have been hurt more than the larger seeded ones. This field had peas in it 2015 but it was the only field I could plant at the time I needed to or the trial would not have been planted. Higher than normal rains along with the hard soild conditions resulted in root rot symptoms showing up around flower. Night temperatures were low 30s. Plants were slow to emerge and many were not as uniform as they should have been. Yields were lower than some years due to lower stands and ranged from 800 lbs per acre to 8596 lbs per acre. See the weather insert at the end of the summary for a breakdown of temperatures and precipitation over the growing season. Please direct any questions to the following mailing address, phone number or email address.

Contact information - Jim Ballerstein, 315-787-2223 (phone) jwb2@cornell.edu (email) We wish to thank the NYS Vegetable Research Council and Association and cooperating seed companies for their financial support of the project. We wish to thank Mr. Buzz Lowe of Farm Fresh First for his assistance in planning the trials. My thanks to team members Floyd Baker, Helen Terra, Wayne Hansen, Matt Gates, Alison Mahoney, Arielle Brotherton, Andrea Lewis and Misty Hotelling and for their assistance in day to day operations. Table of Contents Pages 1 Page 2 Pages 3&4 Pages 5&6 Pages 7&8 Pages 9-14 Title Page and Table 1 Size Diameters Table of Contents Table 2. Cultivar List and Seed Company Maturity Table 3 Plant Characteristics Table 3A - Plot Stand description Table 4 - Maturity, Information and Yield (In order of maturity) Page 15 Explanations for Tables 4 and 5 Pages 16&17 Pages 18&19 Pages 19-21 Pages 21-25 Pages 26&27 Table 5. Plant and Pod Characteristics Table 6. Tenderometer readings and Maturity Comments Cultivar Descriptions from the Seed Source Table 7. Weather Summary and 110 tenderometer unit adjustment chart

Table 2 - Cultivar List and Maturity From Seed Source Cultivar HU Seed Source Leaf Type Seed Treatment Seed Count/lb Germ. index Node to blossom Spring std 1050 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2200 95 3.9 9 to 10 Para 1100 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2433 95 FR-43 1130 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 3086 91 11P42 1132 Pureline afila Maxim/Apron XL 2936 94 PLS M-14 1132 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2318 95 3.7 9 2269 1190 GV afila Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2215 96 3.9 9 to 10 BSC2014 1200 Brotherton Normal maxim+apronxl 2428 95 4.1 Maxim4FS, 435 1200 GV afila ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2142 94 3.5 10 BSC3048 1240 Brotherton afila maxim+apronxl 2304 97 4.1 Maxim4FS, Austin 1250 GV afila ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2278 97 3.2 12 N069-5 1300 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2998 91 Portage std 1305 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2025 99 3.8 10 Lil Mo std 1320 Seminis Normal A,C, Cr 3551 91 2.6 10 to 11 BSC5051 1330 Brotherton Normal maxim+apronxl 2215 100 4.6 SV7401QH 1340 Seminis DetA A,C, Cr 3246 95 3.2 Iona 1348 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2947 95 2.4 509-N 1350 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2070 92 518 1350 GV afila Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2648 94 3.8 CS 460AF 1350 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2170 95 PLS 595 1358 Pureline afila Maxim/Apron XL 2323 95 13 91018 1360 Pureline Normal Maxim/Apron XL 2487 91 410 1360 GV afila Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 3617 96 Impact 1380 Brotherton afila maxim+apronxl 2507 95 3.2 BSCP064 1380 Brotherton Normal maxim+apronxl 4407 99 2 Maxim4FS, 490 1380 GV Normal ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2573 97 3.8 PLS 179 1396 Pureline afila Maxim/Apron XL 2512 95 PLS 183 1400 Pureline afila Maxim/Apron XL 1978 92 Reliance 1420 Seminis DetA A,C, Cr 3254 98 3.2 CS 433AF 1430 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2520 99 BL419 d (59 dacolumbia Normal Vibrance Maxx 3547 93 14 SV8112QH 1430 Seminis DetA A,C, Cr 2770 94 3.1 BSCP070 1450 Brotherton afila maxim+apronxl 3575 88 3.2 DA1470 std 1470 Seminis DetA A,C, Cr 2895 91 3.2 CS 440AF 1475 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2454 97 3.4

Table 2 continuted - Cultivar List and Maturity From Seed Source Cultivar HU Seed Source Leaf Type Seed Treatment Seed Count/lb Germ. SV1231QF 1480 Seminis afila A,C, Cr 3114 92 SV0371QF 1480 Seminis afila A,C, Cr 3244 94 index Node to blossom BL2404 mid Columbia afila Vibrance Maxx 2270 93 14-15 2278 1500 GV afila 5529 1500 GV afila 8288 1500 GV afila Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2529 96 3.6 15 Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 3777 94 2.8 Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2067? 3.7 Lochsa 1500 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2268 99 3.7 15 Welland 1505 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2929 98 2.7 SV7688QF 1520 Seminis DetA A,C, Cr 2751 95 3.2 SV0893QF 1525 Seminis Normal A,C, Cr 2415 95 3.5 Ricco 1530 GV afila 8069 1550 GV afila 513 1550 GV normal Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2445 97 3.7 15 Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2707? 3.6 Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2441 96 4 15 BL415 mid-late Columbia Normal Vibrance Maxx 2522 93 14/15 522 1560 GV afila Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2259 92 4 14-15 SV6844QG 1600 Seminis afila A,C, Cr 2905 99 Trinity 1535 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2844 97 3.6 Concept 1620 Brotherton afila maxim+apronxl 2671 96 3.7 Natches 1550 Crites afila maxim &apronxl 2468 97 3.8 5106 (old 506) 1650 GV afila Maxim4FS, ApronXL,Cruiser5FS 2399 94 BL403 late Columbia Normal Vibrance Maxx 1974 93 15/16 BL2418 late Columbia afila Vibrance Maxx 2671 93 16/17

Table 3. Plant Characteristics Cultivar Plant Stand Rating Heat Units to full flower Root Rot Rating Greenseeker Rating Plant Habit Rating (at Harvest) 1-5 (best) Overall Rating Spring std 3.1 659 2.1 0.49 2 2.25 Para 3.3 720 2.9 0.48 2.4 3.1 FR-43 2.8 720 2.4 0.36 2.3 2.1 11P42 2.8 756 1.5 0.25 2.0 1.8 PLS M-14 2.8 756 1.5 0.24 1.1 1.4 2269 2.9 687 1.9 0.3 1.5 1.9 BSC2014 3.8 756 2.4 0.46 2.3 2.8 435 3.6 794 2.4 0.41 2.5 2.6 BSC3048 3.4 822 2.4 0.41 2.5 2.6 Austin 2.6 794 1.3 0.29 1.6 1.5 Lil Mo std 2.6 756 1.9 0.39 3 2.5 Portage std 3.1 794 2.3 0.43 2.8 2.7 SV0371QF 3.4 952 2.2 0.36 2.1 2.5 CS 460AF 2.9 822 2.3 0.36 2 2 490 3.3 822 2.2 0.34 2 2.5 SV7401QH 3.6 883 3 0.66 2.2 3.3 518 3.9 822 3.5 0.6 2.3 3.4 410 3.5 853 3.1 0.54 2.1 3.3 Impact 3.3 916 2.2 0.37 2.6 2.5 N069-5 2.3 794 1.3 0.26 3 2 Reliance 3 883 2.1 0.33 3.5 2.3 CS 433AF 3.9 916 4 0.63 2 3.4 DA1470 std 2.8 916 2 0.24 3.5 2.5 5529 2.9 1016 2.2 0.31 2.2 2.5 Ricco 3.8 916 3.7 0.65 2 3.4 522 4 989 3.3 0.57 3 3.1 8288 4.3 952 3.3 0.63 3 3.5 BSC5051 3.1 916 2.5 0.45 2 2.3 509-N 2.5 916 1.8 0.3 2.3 2.2 BL419 2.4 883 2.2 0.3 2.5 2.2 BSCP070 3.5 883 3.1 0.48 2 3.1 CS 440AF 3.4 916 2.4 0.35 2 2.7 2278 4 916 3.4 0.61 2 3.3 SV7688QF 3.8 989 3.3 0.59 2.5 3.3

Table 3. Plant Characteristics continued: Cultivar Plant Stand Rating Heat Units to full flower Root Rot Rating Greenseeker Rating Plant Habit Rating (at Harvest) Overall Rating 8069 3.5 916 3 0.6 1.5 3.3 513 2.9 952 2 0.37 2.7 2.3 PLS 179 2.9 952 3 0.32 2.8 2.8 SV1231QF 3.5 989 3 0.48 2.4 3.1 BL2404 3.4 989 3.1 0.46 3.3 3.1 Lochsa 3.4 952 2.5 0.51 2.3 2.5 Welland 3 989 2.6 0.41 3 2.8 5106 4 952 3.5 0.63 3.3 3.5 BL403 3 952 1.5 0.33 3 1.5 Concept 2.8 952 1.3 0.25 3 1 Iona 2.4 952 1.5 0.24 3 1.5 91018 3.4 989 2.5 0.48 2.5 2.5 SV0893QF 3 989 1.5 0.43 2.5 2 BL415 2.9 952 1.8 0.37 2.5 2.7 BL2418 2.4 952 1.5 0.25 3.5 1.5 PLS 183 2.9 1016 2.8 0.39 2 2.8 PLS 595 3.4 952 2.8 0.41 2.5 2.8 Natches 2.8 952 2 0.27 3 2 SV6844QG 2.3 1064 2.3 0.26 3.3 2.5 BSCP064 2.6 1.2 0.28 3 1 Trinity 2.3 1.5 0.28 2.5 1.8 SV8112 2.5 883 2.2 0.22 3 1 Plant Stand A rating four weeks after planting. 1=poor, 5 = excellent (see breakdown by rep table 3A) Heat Units to full flower (base 40 degrees) Root Rot Rating on evaluation trial - 1 = dead, 5 = completely healthy Greenseeker rating - an instrument measures plant cover over the plot. 0 equals no plants, 1.0 complete cover. At harvest. Plant Habit Rating of how well the plants stood at harvest. 1= flat on ground, 10 very erect Overall rating - 1-5 scale with 5 being best. (plant std, habit, overall health, yield potential)

Table 3A - Breakdown of stand ratings by replication Cultivar Stand Ratings on 6/5 Ave. of ratings 6/5/17 Plot rating for harv. on 6/19 (*,?, _) Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Spring std 3.5 3.5 2 3.5 3.1 *? _ * Para 3.5 3.5 3 3 3.3 * *?? FR-43 2.5 3 2.5 3 2.8 *? _? 11P42 2.5 2.5 3 3 2.8 *? PLS M-14 3 2 3 3 2.8 *? 2269 2.5 3.5 2.5 3 2.9? * _? BSC2014 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 3.8 * *?? 435 3 3.5 4 4 3.6 * *?? BSC3048 3.5 2.5 4 3.5 3.4 *?? * Austin 2 1 4 3.5 2.6 * _?? N069-5 1 2 3 3 2.3?? Portage std 2.5 3 4 3 3.1?? *? Lil Mo std 2 2.5 3 3 2.6? _? * BSC5051 2.5 3 3.5 3.5 3.1 _?? * SV7401QH 3 3.5 4 4 3.6 * * * * Iona 2 2 2.5 3 2.4? _?? 509-N 2.5 2 3 2.5 2.5 * _?? 518 4 4 3.5 4 3.9 * * * * CS 460AF 3 2 3 3.5 2.9 * _? * PLS 595 4 3 2.5 4 3.4 *?? * 91018 4 2.5 3 4 3.4 *?? * 410 3.5 3 3.5 4 3.5 *? * * Impact 3.5 3 3 3.5 3.3 *??? BSCP064 2 2.5 2.5 3.5 2.6 _? 490 3 3 3 4 3.3? * PLS 179 3.5 3 2 3 2.9 *? _? PLS 183 3 3 2.5 3 2.9 *??? Reliance 2.5 3 3 3.5 3.0???? CS 433AF 3.5 4 4 4 3.9 * * * * BL419 1 3.5 2 3 2.4 _? _? SV8112QH 1 3 3 3 2.5 _ * BSCP070 3 3.5 4 3.5 3.5 *? *? DA1470 std 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 2.8 _? _? CS 440AF 3.5 3 3 4 3.4 *?? * SV1231QF 3 3.5 3.5 4 3.5 * * * *? SV0371QF 2.5 3 4.5 3.5 3.4 _? *? BL2404 3.5 3 3.5 3.5 3.4 *? *?

Table 3A Continued: Cultivar Stand Ratings on 6/5 Ave. of ratings 6/5/17 Plot rating for harv. on 6/19 (*,?, _) Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 2278 4 4 4 4 4.0 * * * * 5529 2 2.5 3 4 2.9?? 8288 4 4.5 4.5 4 4.3 * * * * Lochsa 3.5 3 3 4 3.4 *?? * Welland 3 2.5 3 3.5 3.0 * _? * SV7688QF 3.5 3.5 4 4 3.8 * * * * SV0893QF 2.5 3 3 3.5 3.0?? _ * Ricco 3.5 3.5 4 4 3.8 * * * * 8069 3 3.5 4 3.5 3.5 * * * * 513 2.5 2 3 4 2.9? * BL415 2.5 2.5 3 3.5 2.9?? _? 522 4 4 4 4 4.0 * * * * SV6844QG 1 3 2.5 2.5 2.3 _ * Trinity 1 2 3 3 2.3 Concept 2 2.5 3 3.5 2.8?? Natches 2 2.5 3 3.5 2.8?? 5106 4 4 4.5 3.5 4.0 * * * * BL403 2.5 3.5 3 3 3.0 _?? *? BL2418 2 3 2 2.5 2.4 _? 6/5 rating: 0 equals all plants dead, 3 considered acceptable and 5 considered excellent. Plot rating for harv. on 6/19 (*,?, _) * is acceptable to good,? Is marginal, _ is unharvestable

Table 4. Maturity Distribution and Yield - (in order of maturity) Cultivar Rep Days to harv. Heat Units to Harv. 1 2 3 4 5 6 size index Ten. #/A Adjusted Yield Based on 110 TU Plants per A (1000) Spring std 1 60 1174 0 1 7 22 46 23 4.8 120 4610 4287 463 5.3 2 60 1174 0 0 5 18 44 33 5.0 140 4399 3783 408 4.7 4 60 1174 0 0 3 14 53 31 5.1 144 4265 3625 468 5.4 Para 1 61 1194 5 12 38 36 9 1 3.4 101 4840 5372 373 4.3 2 61 1194 5 11 38 37 10 0 3.4 108 3507 3578 336 3.9 3 61 1194 2 5 36 47 9 2 3.6 133 2348 2066 388 4.5 Para 1 62 1194 2 4 30 52 12 1 3.7 131 3517 3095 381 4.4 2 62 1194 0 8 33 45 14 0 3.7 125 2377 2163 249 2.9 3 62 1194 0 3 27 50 18 2 3.9 145 2942 2501 413 4.7 FR-43 1 61 1194 11 27 49 14 1 0 2.7 110 3354 3354 373 4.3 2 61 1194 14 24 48 15 1 0 2.7 111 2750 2723 344 3.9 4 61 1194 9 21 53 18 1 0 2.9 138 1552 1335 436 5.0 11P42 1 61 1194 3 5 32 46 14 1 3.7 120 3747 3485 376 4.3 4 61 1194 3 6 33 41 17 0 3.7 123 1514 1393 179 2.1 PLS M-14 1 61 1194 1 2 15 59 22 1 4.1 124 4111 3741 483 5.5 4 61 1194 0 1 12 55 30 2 4.2 132 2271 1999 324 3.7 2269 1 61 1194 0 0 5 19 50 27 5.0 143 3536 3006 403 4.6 2 61 1194 0 1 3 22 49 26 5.0 134 5721 4977 625 7.2 BSC2014 1 61 1194 1 3 23 55 17 1 3.9 127 4648 4183 421 4.8 2 61 1194 2 12 44 30 11 1 3.4 101 7178 7967 582 6.7 3 61 1194 0 2 18 60 19 0 3.9 159 2827 2375 473 5.4 435 1 61 1194 2 3 20 54 22 0 4.0 109 5501 5556 523 6.0 2 61 1194 9 11 33 30 18 1 3.5 88 3258 4920 376 4.3 3 61 1194 2 2 16 59 20 1 4.0 125 2319 2110 329 3.8 435 1 62 1214 0 3 26 55 15 0 3.8 146 2060 1751 473 5.4 2 62 1214 9 12 29 34 17 2 3.5 85 2319 3989 326 3.7 Plts. per foot 3 62 1214 0 1 15 61 22 1 4.1 126 2846 2562 358 4.1

Cultivar Rep Days to harv. Heat Units to Harv. 1 2 3 4 5 6 size index Ten. #/A Adjusted Yield Based on 110 TU Plants per A (1000) BSC3048 1 61 1194 4 8 52 32 5 0 3.3 99 4581 5268 448 5.1 2 61 1194 20 23 45 9 2 0 2.6 82 2175 4460 358 4.1 4 61 1194 7 9 45 35 6 0 3.3 108 2664 2717 348 4.0 BSC3048 1 62 1214 1 4 37 51 7 0 3.6 126 2444 2199 433 5.0 2 62 1214 22 22 42 14 0 0 2.6 77 1102 2568 261 3.0 4 62 1214 3 5 32 57 4 0 3.6 129 2329 2073 341 3.9 Austin 1 61 1194 2 1 10 51 36 1 4.2 100 3900 4407 480 5.5 3 61 1194 3 2 9 44 41 2 4.2 109 3230 3262 488 5.6 4 61 1194 4 2 10 48 37 2 4.2 118 1802 1694 393 4.5 Austin 4 62 1214 0 1 7 46 45 1 4.4 120 2156 2005 341 3.9 3 62 1214 0 1 8 38 50 3 4.5 123 2175 2001 311 3.6 Lil Mo std 3 62 1214 11 36 49 6 0 0 2.5 111 2578 2552 361 4.1 1 62 1214 16 34 44 7 0 0 2.5 112 1715 1681 261 3.0 4 62 1214 14 33 47 7 1 0 2.6 114 2837 2723 433 5.0 Lil Mo std 3 63 1239 6 25 49 17 3 0 2.9 122 2587 2380 324 3.7 4 63 1239 12 26 50 13 1 0 2.7 124 2472 2250 324 3.7 Portage std 1 63 1239 2 5 16 30 42 7 4.3 95 3421 4277 386 4.4 3 63 1239 1 4 15 37 38 6 4.3 98 4293 5023 495 5.7 4 63 1239 3 5 16 29 44 4 4.2 102 1945 2120 353 4.1 Portage std 1 64 1269 0 1 6 28 53 12 4.7 120 1600 1488 217 2.5 3 64 1269 0 2 8 27 57 7 4.6 111 4427 4383 324 3.7 4 64 1269 0 2 14 25 53 6 4.4 110 2099 2099 254 2.9 SV0371QF 2 69 1414 3 5 34 46 12 1 3.7 202 3718 3123 436 5.0 3 69 1414 7 10 34 45 6 0 3.4 156 3000 2520 448 5.1 CS 460AF 1 63 1239 4 6 22 42 25 3 3.9 102 3824 4168 498 5.7 3 63 1239 0 4 29 41 21 4 3.9 119 1351 1270 329 3.8 4 63 1239 10 18 37 28 7 1 3.2 83 4197 8101 473 5.4 CS 460AF 1 64 1269 3 2 27 43 22 3 3.9 116 2511 2385 329 3.8 3 64 1269 2 5 24 39 25 6 4.0 128 1227 1092 222 2.5 4 64 1269 10 14 36 27 13 1 3.3 93 3670 4808 378 4.3 490 1 65 1302 1 4 14 37 38 7 4.3 144 1811 1540 446 5.1 4 65 1302 3 0 4 15 55 25 5.0 127 4399 3959 378 4.3 Plts. per foot

Cultivar Rep Days to harv. Heat Units to Harv. 1 2 3 4 5 6 size index Ten. #/A Adjusted Yield Based on 110 TU Plants per A (1000) SV7401QH 1 65 1302 4 11 41 36 8 1 3.4 101 4015 4457 316 3.6 3 65 1302 1 7 45 37 10 1 3.5 109 5165 5217 505 5.8 4 65 1302 4 14 44 32 6 1 3.3 108 4983 5083 465 5.3 SV7401QH 1 67 1363 2 7 42 39 10 1 3.5 151 6718 5643 411 4.7 3 67 1363 2 3 29 50 16 1 3.8 155 5510 4629 398 4.6 4 67 1363 3 8 42 36 12 1 3.5 136 6172 5369 490 5.6 518 1 69 1414 1 0 36 18 38 7 4.1 148 3086 2592 348 4.0 2 69 1414 1 1 3 20 60 16 4.9 191 3009 2528 391 4.5 3 69 1414 1 1 6 32 51 10 4.6 201 3086 2592 456 5.2 410 1 67 1363 2 2 7 27 49 12 4.6 135 6708 5836 321 3.7 3 67 1363 0 0 2 12 56 30 5.1 170 5884 4943 316 3.6 4 67 1363 0 1 5 20 55 19 4.9 150 7350 6174 363 4.2 Impact 1 69 1414 15 7 10 34 33 0 3.9 168 5760 4838 443 5.1 2 69 1414 1 1 13 55 29 1 4.1 196 2645 2222 246 2.8 4 69 1414 0 4 18 57 21 0 4.0 207 1600 1344 286 3.3 N069-5 3 70 1444 4 5 26 44 21 1 3.8 160 2166 1819 241 2.8 4 70 1444 1 7 34 41 16 1 3.7 169 1821 1529 348 4.0 Reliance 1 65 1302 3 8 29 45 15 1 3.7 100 3412 3855 311 3.6 2 65 1302 0 6 30 41 19 3 3.8 106 2060 2143 236 2.7 3 65 1302 3 6 31 46 14 1 3.7 109 2770 2797 286 3.3 CS 433AF 1 67 1363 0 2 13 37 41 6 4.3 122 6133 5643 396 4.5 2 67 1363 0 0 0 0 100 0 5.0 122 6785 6242 488 5.6 3 67 1363 2 2 12 42 38 5 4.3 125 6564 5974 423 4.9 DA1470 std 2 69 1414 1 5 23 40 30 2 4.0 167 2156 1811 244 2.8 4 69 1414 2 6 23 39 30 1 3.9 164 1610 1352 249 2.9 5529 4 69 1414 5 20 38 11 26 0 3.4 149 3201 2689 468 5.4 Ricco 1 69 1414 1 1 4 16 51 27 5.0 139 4974 4277 348 4.0 2 69 1414 2 1 6 22 49 21 4.8 127 8596 7737 498 5.7 3 69 1414 1 1 4 13 57 25 5.0 145 7619 6476 523 6.0 Plts. per foot

Cultivar Rep Days to harv. Heat Units to Harv. 1 2 3 4 5 6 size index Ten. #/A Adjusted Yield Based on 110 TU Plants per A (1000) 522 1 69 1414 3 1 6 28 52 10 4.5 155 3412 2866 344 3.9 2 69 1414 5 52 15 19 9 2 2.8 93 5712 7482 523 6.0 3 69 1414 1 1 6 24 56 12 4.7 160 6526 5482 523 6.0 522 1 70 1444 0 0 5 28 55 12 4.7 173 3555 2950 473 5.4 2 70 1444 0 3 13 39 38 8 4.4 169 7101 5894 460 5.3 3 70 1444 0 0 2 19 53 26 5.0 110 6325 6325 398 4.6 8288 1 65 1302 3 12 32 38 14 2 3.6 85 4878 8390 488 5.6 2 65 1302 5 7 25 40 23 2 3.8 81 5970 13015 535 6.1 3 65 1302 11 18 38 28 7 1 3.2 92 6095 8167 498 5.7 8288 1 67 1363 1 1 14 43 37 5 4.3 119 6862 6450 498 5.7 2 67 1363 2 1 11 43 40 3 4.3 114 5347 5134 361 4.1 3 67 1363 1 3 19 52 23 3 4.0 118 6804 6396 500 5.7 4 67 1363 2 2 14 45 33 5 4.2 116 5280 5016 428 4.9 8288 1 69 1414 0 1 4 24 59 12 4.8 176 5098 4283 373 4.3 2 69 1414 0 1 5 22 64 8 4.7 161 7446 6255 423 4.9 3 69 1414 0 1 10 51 35 2 4.3 141 6670 5669 373 4.3 BSC5051 3 67 1363 2 3 14 36 39 7 4.3 114 5328 5115 421 4.8 4 67 1363 2 2 17 38 38 5 4.3 116 3872 3678 316 3.6 509-N 1 67 1363 3 4 16 37 35 7 4.2 111 3546 3510 301 3.5 3 67 1363 1 1 7 27 53 11 4.6 123 2022 1860 259 3.0 BL419 2 69 1414 4 7 21 35 27 6 4.0 119 3728 3504 373 4.3 4 69 1414 1 3 12 32 50 3 4.4 128 5031 4478 373 4.3 BSCP070 1 69 1414 4 11 46 34 6 0 3.3 143 5089 4326 358 4.1 2 69 1414 3 10 41 42 5 0 3.4 170 3661 3075 373 4.3 3 69 1414 16 23 44 19 2 0 2.8 117 5827 5536 361 4.1 CS 440AF 1 65 1302 6 14 39 37 5 0 3.3 84 3019 5494 398 4.6 2 65 1302 8 17 40 29 7 0 3.2 85 2300 3956 299 3.4 4 65 1302 7 14 38 37 5 0 3.2 77 2913 6788 376 4.3 CS 440AF 1 67 1363 4 7 29 47 14 0 3.6 127 1342 1207 229 2.6 2 67 1363 2 6 24 50 19 1 3.8 124 3182 2895 363 4.2 4 67 1363 6 11 32 40 12 0 3.5 105 1735 1821 194 2.2 2278 1 69 1414 2 1 5 16 55 20 4.9 137 5779 4970 401 4.6 2 69 1414 1 2 5 18 55 20 4.8 139 5913 5085 523 6.0 3 69 1414 3 4 14 26 44 9 4.4 114 7044 6762 448 5.1 Plts. per foot

Cultivar Rep Days to harv. Heat Units to Harv. 1 2 3 4 5 6 size index Ten. #/A Adjusted Yield Based on 110 TU Plants per A (1000) SV7688QF 1 70 1444 0 3 22 45 26 4 4.0 133 4811 4233 438 5.0 2 70 1444 0 1 13 45 36 5 4.3 144 5510 4684 490 5.6 3 70 1444 0 1 20 47 29 3 4.1 142 7053 5995 530 6.1 8069 1 69 1414 7 5 29 52 6 1 3.5 140 3785 3255 428 4.9 2 69 1414 5 12 41 41 3 0 3.3 100 6670 7537 510 5.9 3 69 1414 1 3 26 61 9 0 3.7 143 6037 5132 647 7.4 513 1 67 1363 1 5 27 47 19 1 3.8 123 2750 2530 448 5.1 4 67 1363 0 3 16 49 31 2 4.1 110 3872 3872 371 4.3 PLS 179 1 70 1444 3 4 18 38 35 3 4.1 140 3239 2786 271 3.1 2 70 1444 0 2 11 33 49 5 4.4 107 4293 4422 269 3.1 4 70 1444 2 4 17 40 35 2 4.1 125 1782 1622 249 2.9 SV1231QF 1 69 1414 8 9 29 25 30 3 3.8 115 3086 2962 294 3.4 2 69 1414 5 7 24 37 27 1 3.8 121 4677 4350 473 5.4 3 69 1414 11 16 37 31 8 1 3.2 89 5357 7821 573 6.6 BL2404 1 69 1414 2 2 7 27 40 24 4.7 120 2415 2246 261 3.0 3 69 1414 3 4 16 25 41 11 4.4 108 4351 4438 336 3.9 4 69 1414 1 2 8 27 49 13 4.6 112 4265 4179 436 5.0 BL2404 1 70 1444 3 5 22 33 34 4 4.1 153 2865 2407 411 4.7 3 70 1444 1 2 7 24 48 18 4.7 120 5319 4946 361 4.1 4 70 1444 0 2 6 13 53 26 4.9 142 4015 3413 436 5.0 Lochsa 1 70 1444 1 5 21 32 36 5 4.1 110 5482 5482 386 4.4 2 70 1444 3 3 19 40 31 5 4.1 125 1945 1770 309 3.5 4 70 1444 0 2 13 30 45 10 4.5 123 5261 4840 393 4.5 Welland 1 70 1444 3 10 33 40 14 1 3.6 120 5951 5535 356 4.1 3 70 1444 1 8 31 40 19 1 3.7 145 3354 2851 373 4.3 4 70 1444 4 10 30 42 15 1 3.6 132 4657 4099 381 4.4 5106 1 69 1414 1 16 6 43 33 1 3.9 119 5798 5450 418 4.8 2 69 1414 1 1 10 39 43 6 4.4 115 7916 7599 473 5.4 3 69 1414 1 16 7 27 45 5 4.1 144 6267 5327 468 5.4 BL403 2 70 1444 1 2 12 28 46 13 4.6 120 3690 3431 326 3.7 3 70 1444 0 1 7 21 48 23 4.8 135 1811 1576 326 3.7 4 70 1444 2 2 17 43 32 5 4.2 144 1284 1092 224 2.6 Plts. per foot

Cultivar Rep Days to harv. Heat Units to Harv. 1 2 3 4 5 6 size index Ten. #/A Adjusted Yield Based on 110 TU Plants per A (1000) Concept 3 70 1444 0 3 14 38 38 6 4.3 133 2156 1897 244 2.8 4 70 1444 0 3 15 41 37 4 4.2 128 3948 3514 373 4.3 Iona 1 69 1414 13 21 37 26 5 1 3.0 98 1648 1929 162 1.9 3 69 1414 8 18 37 29 10 0 3.2 101 1926 2138 236 2.7 4 69 1414 10 18 41 28 3 0 3.1 108 1648 1681 261 3.0 91018 1 69 1414 3 5 22 38 29 3 4.0 102 3086 3364 423 4.9 2 69 1414 1 3 14 37 38 7 4.3 107 2587 2665 17 0.2 4 69 1414 8 11 32 34 17 1 3.5 96 3143 3772 324 3.7 91018 1 70 1444 0 1 9 20 45 25 4.8 113 8155 7911 286 3.3 2 70 1444 0 2 19 42 35 3 4.2 153 2817 2367 261 3.0 4 70 1444 1 4 19 41 33 3 4.1 114 7456 7158 361 4.1 SV0893QF 1 70 1444 1 4 22 33 34 6 4.1 104 2607 2763 406 4.7 2 70 1444 0 3 24 51 20 3 4.0 122 2185 2010 276 3.2 4 70 1444 1 2 17 36 41 4 4.3 106 3230 3359 299 3.4 BL415 2 70 1444 1 6 25 43 23 2 3.9 108 3795 3871 286 3.3 4 70 1444 0 3 18 44 32 3 4.1 186 1485 1263 329 3.8 BL2418 4 70 1444 0 10 35 33 18 4 3.7 111 805 797 249 2.9 PLS 183 1 70 1444 2 3 14 34 40 8 4.3 93 3383 4432 361 4.1 2 70 1444 5 4 15 27 39 13 4.4 100 4370 4938 378 4.3 3 70 1444 2 2 19 52 26 0 4.0 109 805 813 174 2.0 PLS 595 1 70 1444 0 3 9 24 60 4 4.5 108 6162 6285 411 4.7 4 70 1444 4 7 19 30 34 7 4.1 97 4887 5816 458 5.3 Natches 3 70 1444 0 5 18 36 34 8 4.2 94 1380 1078 174 2.0 4 70 1444 1 4 25 33 33 3 4.0 109 2310 2333 366 4.2 SV6844QG 2 72 1509 14 13 24 34 14 4 3.5 78 3412 7950 336 3.9 2 75 1595 0 1 6 31 50 12 4.7 115 6775 6504 311 3.6 Trinity, BSCP064 and SV8112 not able to harvest Plts. per foot

Explanation for Headings in Table 4. Days to Harvest - Number of days from planting until day of harvest. Heat Units to Harvest - Accumulation of heat units (base 40 degree F.) from planting until harvest. Adjusted heat units base 40 - Adjusted to 100 tenderometer reading. Two heat units were added for each unit below 100 and two units were subtracted for each unit above 100. Average sieve percentage - Berries were hand sieved with Seedburo screens. The table on the title page describes the size of the various sieves. Size index - size index reflects the mean sieve size of the variety at harvest. Tenderometer measurement - A model TG4EI Integrating Texturegage was used to determine the tenderometer units of each harvested plot. The average of the three harvested plots per cultivar was listed. Yield - Tons per acre - The weight of the harvested berries was extrapolated to tons per acre. Yield lbs/a - Pounds per acre was determined by extrapolating the total weight of the berries per plot to obtain lbs per acre. Harvest plot was 7 rows by 5 ft in length or 35 row feet. (43560 sq ft/a/.5 ft = 87,120 row ft per acre. 87120 row ft /A divided by 35 harvested row ft gives a factor of 2489. This factor was multiplied by total berry weight harvested per plot to obtain lbs per acre. Adjusted Yield lbs/acre - 28 pounds was added for each tenderometer unit reading below 100. 28 pounds was subtracted for each tenderometer unit reading above 100. Plants/foot - Total number of plants harvested was divided by the 35 row feet harvested to arrive at plants per foot. Plant population per acre - An extrapolation of the number of harvested plants to plants per acre. Explanation for Headings in Table 5. This data was from 30 plants harvested the same day as our yield harvest that was closest to our objective of 100 tenderometer unit reading. Example Variety A was harvested twice at tenderometer readings of 99 and 116. The afternoon of the first harvest (99 units), 30 plants were harvested from the back of the plot, weighed and pods were hand stripped and berries were hand shelled. Node to first flower - The average number of nodes on the stem until the first flower (included that one or two at the soil line or below). Average Number of nodes with pods per plant - The number of nodes that had pods were counted and recorded. Weight of the 30 plant sample - The weight of the sample (plants and pods) was recorded in pounds. Weight of the plants - After the pods were taken off and weighed, the calculation was made of the plant weight. Weight of the pods - After the pods were hand picked from the plant, total weight of the pods was recorded in pounds. Weight of the berries - The berries were hand shelled from pods, counted and weighed in pounds. Pods per plant - The total number of pods was divided by 30 (number of plants) to determine average pods per plant. Percentage of single pods, double pods or triple pods per node - The number of pods per node were hand counted and the number of single pods, double pods and triple pods were recorded. This was changed to a percentage. Pod length - An average of 10 pods were lined up and measured in inches. If they were very uniform, a single number was listed, if not a range was listed. Berries per pod Ten uniform pods were selected and opened. The range of berries per pod in this group was listed.

Table 5. Plant and Pod Characteristics (In order of maturity) Cultivar Node to first flower vine length (inches) # Nodes with Pods/plt. Pods per plant # of Single pods/ node # of Double pods/ node # Triple pods/ node # of Quad. Pods /node of Single pods/ node of Double pods/ node Spring std 7 to 10 15 to 21 2.4 2.7 2.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 81 25 0 0 6 to 8 4 to 7 Para 8 to 10 16 to 19 3.0 4.5 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 34 66 0 0 7 to 8 5 to 8 FR-43 7 to 10 13 to 15 3.1 5.0 1.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 23 77 0 0 5 to 7 4 to 8 11P42 7 to 10 11 to 13 1.8 2.7 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 33 67 0 0 7 to 8 6 to 8 PLS M-14 7 to 9 12 to 16 1.7 2.6 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.0 34 62 8 0 6.5 to 8 5 to 9 2269 7 to 10 14 to 16 1.5 2.1 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 48 56 0 0 6 to 8 5 to 7 BSC2014 8 to 10 14 to 18 2.9 4.9 0.9 2.0 0.0 0.0 19 81 0 0 7 to 8 6 to 8 435 9 to 11 13 to 16 1.8 2.9 0.7 1.1 0.0 0.0 24 76 0 0 7 to 9 5 to 8 BSC3048 9 to 11 12 to 17 3.0 4.5 1.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 32 68 0 0 6 to 8 6 to 8 of Triple pods/ node of Quad. pods/ node Pod length (cm) Berries per pod Austin 9 to 11 14 to 18 1.7 2.7 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.0 28 72 0 0 6 to 7 6 to 10 Lil Mo std 8 to 11 11 to 13 2.1 3.2 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 30 70 0 0 5 to 7 5 to 8 Portage std 9 to 11 15 to 17 1.4 2.2 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.0 33 56 13 0 6 to 7 3 to 5 SV0371QF 10 to 13 15 to 18 2.5 4.5 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.0 17 63 20 0 6 to 7 7 to 10 CS 460AF 10 to 12 11 to 14 1.6 2.4 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.0 37 52 12 0 7 to 10 6 to 10 490 9 to 13 10 to 18 2.7 4.8 0.6 2.1 0.0 0.0 12 88 0 0 7 to 9 5 to 8 SV7401QH 9 to 13 13 to 17 2.6 4.6 0.9 1.5 0.3 0.0 19 63 17 0 6 to 8 6 to 9 518 10 to 13 16 to 20 2.7 3.9 1.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 37 63 0 0 7 to 10 5 to 8 410 11 to 14 20 to 23 3.1 5.1 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 20 80 0 0 7 to 10 5 to 7 Impact 12 to 14 18 to 20 3.1 4.7 1.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 30 70 0 0 6 to 8 5 to 9 N069-5 11 to 14 13 to 16 1.5 2.5 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.0 27 47 28 0 6 to 8 5 to 8 Reliance 12 to 14 12 to 16 2.2 3.4 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.0 31 63 6 0 6 to 8 6 to 9 CS 433AF 10 to 12 15 to 17 2.5 4.5 0.9 1.1 0.5 0.0 19 50 31 0 6 to 8 5 to 6 DA1470 std 10 to 13 13 to 16 2.5 4.3 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.0 22 66 9 3 6 to 8 6 to 8 5529 13 to 16 12 to 15 3.4 6.0 1.4 1.5 0.6 0.0 23 49 28 0 6 to 11 5 to 9 Ricco 12 to 15 18 to 22 2.0 3.3 0.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 24 73 3 0 6 to 9 5 to 7 522 13 to 16 18 to 20 1.7 3.0 0.8 0.8 0.1 0.0 27 54 7 0 6 to 8 6 to 7 8288 11 to 15 17 to 21 2.2 4.2 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.0 14 55 31 0 5 to 7 5 to 7 BSC5051 11 to 13 10 to 14 3.7 7.9 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 16 3 0 0 5 to 8 4 to 7 509-N 9 to 12 13 to 15 3.0 4.7 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 33 63 0 0 7 to 11 5 to 9

Table 5 continued: Cultivar Node to first flower vine length (inches) # Nodes with Pods/plt. Pods per plant # of Single pods/ node # of Double pods/ node # Triple pods/ node # of Quad. Pods /node of Single pods/ node of Double pods/ node BL419 12 to 16 9 to 11 2.8 4.5 1.3 1.4 0.1 0.0 29 64 4 3 6 to 7 5 to 7 BSCP070 11 to 13 12 to 15 1.9 4.3 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.0 7 31 62 0 5 to 6 4 to 8 CS 440AF 11 to 15 12 to 16 1.5 2.8 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.0 14 75 11 0 6 to 8 6 to 9 2278 11 to 13 15 to 18 2.2 3.7 0.8 1.4 0.0 0.0 21 77 3 0 6 to 8 6 to 9 SV7688QF 12 to 15 14 to 18 2.2 3.9 0.8 1.1 0.3 0.0 21 59 21 0 5 to 8 5 to 9 8069 13 to 15 13 to 16 2.4 4.5 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.0 21 43 37 0 6 to 8 4 to 7 513 12 to 13 12 to 16 1.8 2.8 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.0 27 66 8 0 7 to 9 7 to 9 PLS 179 13 to 15 17 to 20 2.5 3.9 1.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 28 73 0 0 8 to 10 7 to 9 SV1231QF 11 to 14 14 to 17 2.0 3.7 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.0 19 43 38 0 6 to 8 6 to 7 BL2404 13 to 16 15 to 18 1.8 2.9 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.0 22 92 0 0 7 to 9 5 to 9 Lochsa 10 to 14 12 to 16 3.4 6.1 1.2 1.7 0.5 0.0 20 55 25 0 6 to 8 6 to 7 Welland 12 to 16 18 to 22 2.1 4.1 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.0 15 44 41 0 5 to 7 6 to 8 5106 (old 506) 11 to 14 16 to 20 30 plant sample not completed 6 to 9 6 to 9 BL403 12 to 15 12 to 16 30 plant sample not completed 6 to 8 5 to 7 Concept 9 to 12 6 to 9 30 plant sample not completed 6 to 8 6 to 8 Iona 13 to 16 10 to 15 91018 13 to 15 18 to 23 2.1 4.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0 13 31 53 3 6 to 8 6 to 9 SV0893QF 11 to 15 13 to 16 2.1 3.9 0.6 1.2 0.2 0.0 16 63 18 3 5 to 8 5 to 8 BL415 12 to 15 13 to 18 2.1 3.9 0.6 1.3 0.2 0.0 16 66 18 0 6 to 7 5 to 8 BL2418 11 to 14 10 to 13 30 plant sample not completed 6 to 8 6 to 8 PLS 183 13 to 15 14 to 19 1.7 3.3 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.0 23 52 51 0 7 to 9 4 to 8 of Triple pods/ node of Quad. pods/ node Pod length (cm) Berries per pod PLS 595 13 to 15 17 to 22 1.9 3.0 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 29 67 3 0 6 to 12 8 to 10 Natches 12 to 17 10 to 12 30 plant sample not completed SV6844QG 14 to 17 14 to 17 3.5 5.1 1.8 1.6 0.0 0.0 36 63 2 0 6 to 8 4 to 9 BSCP064 10 to 13 12 to 15 SV8112QH 10 to 12 9 to 12 not enough plants to sample not harvested not harvested Trinity 11 to 16 12 to 14 30 plant sample not completed 6 to 10 7 to 9 See page 15 for column explanations.

Table 6. Maturity Tenderometer unit measurement (Days after planting - gray area indicates harvest dates) Day 56 Day 67 Day 54 23 HU Day 57 Day 60 Day 61 Day 62 Day 63 Day 64 Day 65 31 HU 27 HU 6/20 6/22 30 HU 6/23 23 HU 6/26 21 HU 6/27 20 HU 6/28 26 HU 6/29 30 HU 6/30 33 HU 7/1 7/3 Cultivar Spring std 70 74 87 120 Para 83 117 114 134 FR-43 126 120 11P42 106 122 PLS M-14 81 112 128 2269 82 106 139 BSC2014 123 129 435 77 95 107 119 BSC3048 97 96 111 Austin 99 109 122 Lil Mo 106 112 123 Portage 85 92 98 114 SV0371QF 76 181 CS 460AF 97 101 112 490 76 135 SV7401QH 74 77 82 106 147 Day 69 25 HU 7/5 518 76 76 79 180 410 85 152 Impact 78 190 Day 70 30 HU 7/6 N069-5 88 165 Reliance 79 86 105 CS433AF 73 87 123 DA 1470 74 166 5529 67 149 Ricco 62 69 137 522 75 136 151 Day 71 30 HU 7/7 Day 72 32 HU 7/8 Day 75 30 HU 7/10

Cultivar Day 54 27 HU 6/20 Day 56 23 HU 6/22 Day 57 30 HU 6/23 Day 60 23 HU 6/26 Day 61 21 HU 6/27 Day 62 20 HU 6/28 Day 63 26 HU 6/29 Day 64 30 HU 6/30 Day 65 33 HU 7/1 Day 67 31 HU 7/3 8288 72 86 86 117 159 BSC5051 65 89 115 509-N 80 117 BL419 119 124 BSCP070 76 143 CS440AF 85 82 119 2278 61 72 130 Day 69 25 HU 7/5 SV7688QF 90 140 8069 72 128 513 82 117 Day 70 30 HU 7/6 PLS179 91 115 SV1231QF 72 108 BL2404 66 113 138 Lochsa 104 119 Welland 85 132 5106 74 76 126 BL403 86 133 Concept 80 131 Iona 66 102 91018 65 102 127 SV0893QF 82 111 BL415 105 147 BL2418 90 111 PLS183 92 101 PLS595 101 103 Natches 82 102 Day 71 30 HU 7/7 Day 72 32 HU 7/8 Day 75 30 HU 7/10 SV6844QG 66 78 115 BSCP064 186 Samples were one gallon of pods (roughly one foot of row by 7 rows - one replication)

Additional Comments: General comments: It was difficult to draw any definitive conclusions from the trial due to the variation between and within the replicates or even within individual blocks. Normally three replications of plots are harvested and the average of the three listed in the report. Many cultivars did not have three reps harvested as seen in Table 4. Three cultivars did not have enough plants to harvest at all. Overall score based on visual observation and notes for all four replicates (4-best, 1 poorest). This rating takes into account root rot, plant type, berry type and yield if plant and pods looked good and yield was average, it still got a higher rating. * Indicates a 3.0 or better. Varieties in order of maturity. Spring Early standard, large sieve, two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.1, plant habit recumbent, overall rating 2.25. *Para Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.9, uniform pods, one of the better early maturity cultivars, overall rating 3.1. FR-43 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.4, smaller sieve, overall rating 2.1. 11P42 No replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.5, overall rating 1.8. PLS M-14 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.5, overall rating 1.4. 2269 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.9, overall rating 1.9. BSC2014 Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.4, overall rating 2.8. 435 Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.4, overall rating 2.6. BSC3048 Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.4, overall rating 2.6. Austin One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.3, overall rating 1.5. Lil Mo One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.9, smaller sieve, overall rating 2.5. Portage One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.3, overall rating 2.7. SV0371QF One of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.2, overall rating 2.5. CS460AF Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.3, overall rating 2.0. 490 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.2, overall rating 2.5. *SV7401QH Three out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3, yielded well, overall rating 3.3. *518 Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.5, harvested overmature but uniform yield, overall rating 3.4. *410 Three out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.1, yielded well, overall rating 3.3.

Additional comments continued: Impact One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.2, overall rating 2.5. N069-5 No replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.3, overall rating 2.0. Reliance None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.1, overall rating 2.3. *CS433AF Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 4, yielded well, one of the best in trial, overall rating 3.4. DA1470 None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2, overall rating 2.5. 5529 None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.2, overall rating 2.5. Ricco Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.7, good yields, overall rating 3.4. *522 Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.3, harvested overmature but yielded well, overall rating 3.1. *8288 Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.3, very good yield, overall rating 3.5. BSC5051 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.5, indeterminate, overall rating 2.3. 509-N One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.8, overall rating 2.2. BL419 None of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.2, overall rating 2.2. *BSCP070 Three of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.1, decent yield, overall rating 3.1. CS440AF Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.4, overall rating 2.7. *2278 Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.4, good yield, overall rating 3.3. *SV7688QF Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.3, good yields, overall rating 3.3. *8069 Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3, good yields, overall rating 3.3. 513 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2, overall rating 2.3. PLS179 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3, overall rating 2.8. *SV1231QF Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3, decent yield, overall rating 3.1.

Additional comments continued: BL2404 Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.1, decent yield, overall rating 3.1. Lochsa Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.5, overall rating 2.5. Welland Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.6, overall rating 2.8. **5106 Four out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 3.5, good yield, one of the best, overall rating 3.5. BL403 None of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.5, overall rating 1.5. Concept - None of replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.3, overall rating 1. Iona None of replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.5, overall rating 1.5. 91018 Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.5, overall rating 2.5. SV 0893QF One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.5, overall rating 2.0. BL415 None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.8, overall rating 2.7. BL2418 None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.5, overall rating 1.5. PLS 183 One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.8, overall rating 2.8. PLS595 Two out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.8, overall rating 2.8. Natches None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2, overall rating 2.0. SV6844QG One out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 2.3, overall rating 2.5. BSCP064 None out of four replications acceptable stands, root rot rating 1.2, unable to harvest, overall rating 1.0 Trinity Very poor stands all reps, root rot rating 1.5, unable to harvest, overall rating 1.8. SV8112QH Very poor stands in all reps, root rot rating 2.2, unable to harvest, overall rating 1.0. Descriptions Provided by the Seed Source Spring Seminis, normal leaf, 1050 heat units, 4.5 average sieve size, 9 nodes to flower, 1-2 pods per plant, 6-7 berries per pod, 16 inch plant height, resistance to Fusarium wilt race 1. Para Pure Line, 1130 heat units, +2 compared to Spring, blooms at the 10 th node, 3.8 sieve size, R for Fusarium Wilt r2 and tolerance for root rot complexes. FR-43 Pure Line, 1130 heat units, +3 compared to Spring, blooms at the 10 th node, 3.2 sieve size. 11P42 Pure Line, afila, 11132 heat units, +3 compared to Spring, blooms at the 10 th node, 3.7 sieve size, T for Fusarium Wilt r2.

Descriptions provided by the seed source continued: PLSM-14 Pure Line, normal leaf type, 1132 heat units, +3 compared to Spring, 3.8 average sieve size, 10 nodes to first flower, R for Fusarium wilt race 1. FP2269 Gallatin Valley, Early afila leaf type with great emergence in cool soils. 57 days to maturity, Maturity near 1200 heat units, 10 nodes to first flower, 24 plant height, avg. 2 pods per node, 7-8 berries per pod, pod shape is blunt, 3.9 average sieve size. Fusarium (Fop) HR (1), Powdery Mildew (PM) HR(1). Good yield. BSC2014 Brotherton, early season freezer type, compare to Sherwood, 9 nodes to first flower, normal leaf, 4.1 sieve size, 1200 heat units. GV435 Gallatin Valley, First early afila type, have little or no root rot resistance, 57 days to maturity, 1200 avg. heat units, 10 nodes to first flower, 22 avg. plant height, avg. 2 pods per node, avg. sieve size 3.5, 8-9 berries per pod,. BSC 3048 Brotherton, 1240 heat units, afila leaf type, 4.1 sieve size. Austin (FP 2311) Gallatin Valley, Second early afila leaf type with good plant vigor. Maturity is considered 60 days or near 1280 heat units. Good plant type, avg. 12 nodes at first bloom, plant height 22, avg. pods per node 2, avg. sieve size 3.2, avg. berries per pod 7-8, Fusarium (fop) HR (1,2), Powdery Mildew (PM) HR(1). Lil Mo Seminis, 1320 heat units to harvest, normal leaf type, 2.6 ave. sieve, 10-11 nodes to first flower, 1-2 pods per node, 8-9 berries per pod, 18 inch plant height, HR for Fus R1 (Fop1) and HR for Fus R2 (Fop2). Portage Crites, midseason maturity, 60 days to maturity or approximately 1325 heat units (+ 2 days relative to Tomahawk), afila leaf type, 18 inch plant height, 10 nodes to first bloom, 2-3 pods per node, 7-8 peas per pod, 3.7 sieve size index, resistant to fusarium wilt race 1. SV0371QF Seminis, 1480 heat units, afila, good tolerance to root rot. CS460AF Crites, afila 3.5sv 1350 HU Wilt 1, 2 PM. Good disease package. 490 Gallatin Valley, normal leaf type, second early maturity (1380 heat units). 61 days to maturity, 12 nodes to first bloom, plant ht 24, avg. 2 pods per node, avg. sieve size 3.8, 8-9 berries per pod. SV7401QH Seminis, heat units 1340, unique determinate, normal leaf with sweet savor trait, sieve size is 3.2, possibly commercially available in 2017. GVS 518 Gallatin Valley, Mid season Afila type, 67 days to maturity, 1350 heat units, 12-13 nodes to first flower, plant height 25, avg. 2 pods per node, avg. sieve size is 3.8, pointed pod shape. GV410 Gallatin Valley, afila, second early - 1360 heat units, 3.8 sieve. Impact Brotherton, 1380 heat units, afila leaf type, 3.2 sieve size. N069-5 Pure Line, normal leaf1350 heat units, +8 compared to Spring, 15 th node to flower, R for powdery mildew.

Descriptions provided by the seed source continued: Reliance - Seminis, determinate afila type, 1420 heat units or midseason maturity, 14 nodes to first flower, 2-3 pods per node, 8 berries per pod, 3.2 average sieve size, 18 inch plant height, HR for Ep, Fop1, Fop2, PEMV and BYMV; IR for Pv. The 2 nd reproductive node is a terminal node with 2 racemes. This variety does not carry the Sweet Savor gene but it appears to relatively slow in the conversion of sugar to starch. A very homogenous fresh product in color and quality. Easy to harvest plant type. CS433AF Crites, afila, 1400 heat units, 3.8 sieve size, Resistance for Fusarium wilt races 1&2, good disease package, can set triple pods. DA 1470 (EX08540794) Seminis, 1470 heat units, determinate afila type, 3.2 average sieve size, 2-3 pods per node, 7-9 berries per pod, 18 inch plant height, HR for Fus R1 (Fop1) and HR for BY (BYMV). Sweet savor gene which slows conversion of sugar to starch, true determinate plant type which allows for improved sieve distribution and less waste at harvest from immature fruit. 5529 GV, 1500 heat units, afila leaf type, 2.8 sieve. Ricco Gallatin Valley, Main season variety (68 days to maturity or 1530 heat units), afila leaf type, 16 nodes to first flower, 26 inch plant height, 2 pods per node, 3.7 average sieve size, 8-9 berries per pod, pointed pod shape, HR for Fusarium wilt race 1 and IR for race 2, HR for Bean Leaf Roll Virus and Powdery Mildew race 1, dark green foliage, excellent disease package including root rot tolerance, superior yield, medium size berry, uniform berry color, widely adapted. 522 Gallatin Valley, Mid-Season Afila type, 69 days to maturity, 1560 heat units, 14-15 nodes to first flower, plant height 25, avg. 3 pods per node, avg. sieve size is 4, 7-8 berries per pod, blunt pod shape, HR (1) to Powdery Mildew (PM), 8288 GV, 1500 heat units, afila leaf type, 3.7 sieve. BSC5051 Brotherton, 1330 heat units, normal leaf type, 4.6 sieve size. 509-N Pure Line, normal leaf type, 1350 heat units, +11 compared to Spring, 14 node to bloom, R for Powdery Mildew. BL419 Columbia, normal leaf type, 14 nodes to flower, 59 days to harvest, resistance to virus, ascochyta blight, fusarium wilt, powdery mildew and downy mildew. BSCP070 Brotherton, 1450 heat units, afila leaf type, 3.2 sieve size. CS-440AF Crites, afila leaf type, +11 days relative to Tomahawk maturity, 3.4 sieve size index, pod set 2-3 pods per node. FP2278 Gallatin Valley, Mid-Season Afila type, 69 days to maturity, 1500 heat units, 15 nodes to first flower, plant height 26, avg. 2 pods per node, avg. sieve size is 3.6, 7-9 berries per pod, blunt pod shape, Fusarium (fop) HR(1,2), Powdery Mildew (PM) HR (1). SV7688QF Seminis, Sweet Savor gene type, Determinate afila leaf type, Sweet Savor gene type, 1520 heat units, 3.2 average sieve size, strong against root rot, good disease package. 8069 GV, 1550 heat units, 3.6 sieve.

Descriptions provided by the seed source continued: 513 Gallatin Valley, Mid-Season normal leaf type, 69 days to maturity, 1550 heat units, 15 nodes to first bloom, plant height 25, avg, 3 pods per node, avg. sieve size is 4, pod shape is blunt, Bolero type with RR. PLS179 Pure Line, afila leaf type, 1396 heat units, +13 compared to Spring, 4.3 sieve size, R for powdery mildew, T for PEMV and Fusarium root rot. SV1231QF Seminis, 1480 heat units, afila sweet savor, similar maturity as DA1470 but not as determinate. BL2404 Columbia, Maturity to Avola/Spring +10, afila leaf type, dark green 20 plant, 14-15 nodes to first flower, blunt pod shape, pod length 8 cm, pod width 14 mm, pod color med., pea color dark, berries per pod 7, Fusarium race R, PM R, Virus R. Maturity against Lincoln +3. Lochsa (420AF) Crites, normal leaf type, 1550 heat units (+11 days relative to Tomahawk maturity), 15 nodes to first flower, 67 days to 100 TR, plant height is 20, 2 pods per node, 8-9 berries per pod, avg. sieve size is 3.7, Fusarium Wilt Races (1,2,5), resistance to PM. Welland Crites, afila plant that stands well, 1575 heat units, 2.7 sieve size index, pod set 3 pods per node, Resistance to Fusarium wilt races 1&2 and powdery mildew, high yield potential. GV5106 Gallatin Valley, late - 1650 heat units, afila. BL403 Columbia, normal leaf type, 15-16 nodes to flower, 65 days to harvest, resistance to virus, Fusarium wilt and powdery mildew. Concept Brotherton, 1620 heat units, afila leaf type, 3.7 sieve size. Iona Pure Line, normal leaf type, 1348 heat units, +10 days compared to Spring, 15 nodes to first bloom, 3.4 average sieve size. 91018 Pure Line, normal leaf type, 1360 heat units, +12 compared to Spring, 14 th nodes to flower, R for powdery mildew. SV40893QF Seminis, late season, 1525 heat units, normal leaf type, 3.50 average sieve size, 14 nodes to first flower, 2-3 pods per node, 8-9 berries per pod, 24 inch plant height, wr gene, HR for BYMV/Ep/Fop:1, IR for Pv; S to Fop2 and Aps. BL415 Columbia Seed, normal leaf type, 63 days to harvest, 14 nodes to flower, dark green berry color, resistance to pea virus, fusarium wilt race 1, pea wilt and powdery mildew. BL 2418 Columbia Seeds, afila, 66 days to harvest, 16 nodes to flower, dark berry color, resistance to pea virus, fusarium race 1 and powdery mildew. PLS183 Pure Line, afila type, 1400 heat units, remarkable yields, 16 nodes to first bloom, 4.7 average sieve size, 27-29 inch plant height, 2-3 average pods per node, intense berry color, Tolerance to fusarium wilt r2, PEMV and Powdery Mildew. PLS595 Pure Line afila leaf type, 1358 heat units, +12 days compared to Spring, 4.4 sieve size, 16 nodes to first flower, R fior powdery mildew, T for downy mildew.

Naches Crites, afila type, 1640 heat units (+14 days relative to Tomahawk maturity), 16 nodes to first flower, 72 days to 100TR, plant height 20, 3 pods per node, 8-9 berries per pod, avg. sieve size is 3.8, Resistance for Fusarium Wilt Races(s) (1,2,5) and PM. SV6844QG Seminis, 1600 heat units, afila, sweet savor, good disease package, trial stages. BSCP064 Brotherton, 1380 heat units, normal leaf type, 2.0 sieve size. Trinity (CS435) Crites, afila leaf type, 1615 heat units (+13 days relative to Tomahawk maturity), 3.6 avg. sieve size, pod set 3 pods per node, Race1,2, PM resistance. SV8112QH Seminis, Sweet Savor gene type, Determinate afila leaf type, Sweet Savor gene type, 1430 heat units, Similar maturity as Reliance but Reliance not sweet savor, 3.1 average sieve size, good disease package. A cutting will be held on November 9th where frozen peas are warmed and evaluated by a number of processing and seed company representatives. Evaluations are done only be seed company and industry representatives.

Table 7. Weather Summary and 110 tenderometer chart Date days Max. Temp. Min. Temp. Mean Temp. Precip. Acc Precip. Degree days base 40 acc dd units base 40 Ten. Units Corrigation factor for Yield 4/28/17 1 77 51 64 0.12 0 24 24 80 2.33 4/29/17 2 69 52 60.5 0.2 0.2 20.5 44.5 81 2.18 4/30/17 3 58 39 48.5 0 0.2 8.5 53 82 2.05 5/1/17 4 65 40 52.5 0 0.2 12.5 65.5 83 1.93 5/2/17 5 71 49 60 0.82 1.02 20 85.5 84 1.82 5/3/17 6 57 42 49.5 0.08 1.1 9.5 95 85 1.72 5/4/17 7 53 35 44 0 1.1 4 99 86 1.64 5/5/17 8 52 35 43.5 0.6 1.7 3.5 102.5 87 1.57 5/6/17 9 55 41 48 0.7 2.4 8 110.5 88 1.51 5/7/17 10 47 37 42 0.45 2.85 2 112.5 89 1.46 5/8/17 11 42 35 38.5 0.08 2.93 0 112.5 90 1.42 5/9/17 12 48 34 41 0 2.93 1 113.5 91 1.38 5/10/17 13 55 34 44.5 0 2.93 4.5 118 92 1.34 5/11/17 14 52 35 43.5 0 2.93 3.5 121.5 93 1.31 5/12/17 15 58 38 48 0 2.93 8 129.5 94 1.28 5/13/17 16 64 43 53.5 0.01 2.94 13.5 143 95 1.25 5/14/17 17 56 40 48 0.01 2.95 8 151 96 1.22 5/15/17 18 61 46 53.5 0.25 3.2 13.5 164.5 97 1.19 5/16/17 19 63 45 54 0 3.2 14 178.5 98 1.17 5/17/17 20 66 47 56.5 0.02 3.22 16.5 195 99 1.15 5/18/17 21 86 58 72 0 3.22 32 227 100 1.13 5/19/17 22 86 60 73 0.44 3.66 33 260 101 1.11 5/20/17 23 67 46 56.5 0.01 3.67 16.5 276.5 102 1.09 5/21/17 24 63 47 55 0.01 3.68 15 291.5 103 1.07 5/22/17 25 67 52 59.5 0.22 3.9 19.5 311 104 1.06 5/23/17 26 68 44 56 0.22 4.12 16 327 105 1.05 5/24/17 27 71 47 59 0 4.12 19 346 106 1.04 5/25/17 28 74 52 63 0.1 4.22 23 369 107 1.03 5/26/17 29 61 52 56.5 0.77 4.99 16.5 385.5 108 1.02 5/27/17 30 62 55 58.5 0.05 5.04 18.5 404 109 1.01 5/28/17 31 64 49 56.5 0.02 5.06 16.5 420.5 110 1.00 5/29/17 32 76 55 65.5 0.2 5.26 25.5 446 111 0.99 5/30/17 33 76 56 66 0.16 5.42 26 472 112 0.98 5/31/17 34 70 56 63 0.58 6 23 495 113 0.97 6/1/17 35 73 52 62.5 0.03 6.03 22.5 517.5 114 0.96 6/2/17 36 66 46 56 0 6.03 16 533.5 115 0.96