MDEC Conference October 5 th, 2016 1 S3P1 1
Sudbury Operations Mining Operation Plant Onaping Deep Mine Strathcona Mill Fraser Mine Ni Rim Deep Ni Rim South Mine Smelter City of Sudbury 10km 3 BATTERY ELECTRIC OPPORTUNITY Onaping Depth Project S3P1 2
Isometric View 5 Ventilation Requirements In general ventilation is required in order to provide workers and diesel engines a source of fresh air to dilute and clear away contaminants in the mining process. These include the following: Toxic equipment exhaust gases (CO, CO2, NOx, Hydrocarbons etc.) Diesel Particulate matter (DPM) Heat Dust (silica) Blasting fumes (CO, NO2 etc.) Other gases (SO2, ammonia, Radon) Current legislation in Ontario is 0.06 m3/s for each kw of power of the diesel engine in underground mines. 6 S3P1 3
Ventilation Requirements What would ventilation requirements look like if there was no diesel equipment? We would need to ventilate for air quality. These would include the following: Heat Dust (silica) Blasting fumes (CO, NO2 etc.) Other gases (SO2, ammonia, Radon) In deeper mines like Onaping Depth the driver for ventilation will become heat. 7 Efficiency of Diesel Engines Diesel engines are typically 44% efficient (producing work) and the other ~56% of diesel fuel is converted to heat ~29 kw exhaust gas heat 8 kw charge air cooling ~100 kw fuel energy in 44 kw work output ~15 kw Heat to cooling ~4 kw Engine friction 8 S3P1 4
Efficiency of Electric Motors Electric motors are typically ~93% efficient. ~100 kw Elec energy in 93 kw work output ~7 kw Heat 9 HEAT LOSSES FROM DIESEL AND BATTERY LOADERS: 100% Diesel Fuel Energy 8% Charge Air Cooling 29% Exhaust Gases 15% Heat to Coolant 100% Battery Energy 44 % Diesel Engine Peak efficieny 4% Engine Friction 4% Torque Converter n=0,9 2% Gear Box n=0,95 3% Axles n=0,92 n = 35% To wheels and rolling resistance n = 73% To wheels and rollig resistance 7% Battery Heat n= 0,93 3% Power Electronics Losses n=0,97 7% Electric Motor Losses n=0,93 4% Drop Box n=0,95 6% Axles n=0,92 S3P1 5
Power Regeneration The battery electric systems offers the ability of the electrical motors to be used for regenerative braking especially when going down ramp. Regenerative braking converts the kinetic energy from braking back into the batteries rather that dissipating it off as heat. This makes battery significantly more efficient than diesel especially when hauling in a down ramp application. 11 Reduced Ventilation Cost There is some reduction in ventilation cost to consider Reduction in number and/or size of ventilation raises Reduction in number of fans Reduction in heat generation due to auto-compression of ventilation air forced underground Smaller drift size Reduction in size of air cooling plant required on surface Increased humidity due to burning of diesel fuel For the same amount of work done you generate approximately 6-7 times less heat using battery electric over diesel 12 S3P1 6
Onaping Depth Project Prefeasibility Study 2016 Battery Electric Equipment Opportunity 13 #3/4/5 #1 #7 93 Onaping Depth Project Diesel Fleet Craig 200 152 438 Onaping No. 1 RAR FAR 4000L 1150L Tram Drift (4.6 x 5.2m) Ore Bin Waste Bin 4000L Tram 4200L Onaping No. 2 5000L 7 Production 114 1200L Service 1440L 125 56 4300L Truck Dump 4500L Crusher 4700L Loading Pocket 4900L 4800L 51-0 6000L Exploration Ramp 6.5 m dia. 257 325 BAC 6 1915L 315 RA Ramp (5.0m x 5.4m) 57-1 5700L 5.0 m dia. Exhaust Raise 1985L Exhaust Fan CSC Production Levels: 5.0 m x 5.4 m ramp/drifts 54 vent ducts (5) Ore Passes 2280L 2300L 2320L 2340L 2360L 2380L 2405L 2430L 2455L 2480L 2505L 2530L 2555L 2580L green - Phase 1 (access) yellow - Phase 2 (ore/waste handling system + mine infrastructure) purple Phase 3 (mine development & production ramp-up to 60%) black existing infrastructure 73 287 6 302 2405L 2515L 2555L 2605L loading pocket 2635L shaft bottom Ventilation Flow = 300 m 3 /s Bulk Air Cooler (BAC) = 23.7 MWr Condensing Spray Chamber (CSC) = 32.5 MWr Ventilation Fan Power = 10,500 kw Refrigeration Power = 7,100 kw total = 17,600 kw 14 S3P1 7
#3/4/5 #1 #7 Onaping No. 1 RAR 64 FAR Onaping Depth Project Battery Electric Fleet Opportunity Craig 160 149 360 4000L 1150L Tram Drift (4.6 x 5.2m) Ore Bin Waste Bin 4000L Tram 4200L Onaping No. 2 5000L 18 Production 67 1200L Service 1440L 72 55 4300L Truck Dump 4500L Crusher 4700L Loading Pocket 4900L 4800L 51-0 6000L Exploration Ramp 5.0 m dia. 133 189 BAC 6 1915L 210 RA Ramp (5.0m x 5.4m) 57-1 5700L 3.8 m dia. Exhaust Raise 1985L Exhaust Fan CSC Production Levels: 4.6 m x 4.9 m ramp/drifts 42 vent ducts 2280L 2300L 2320L 2340L 2360L 2380L 2405L 2430L 2455L 2480L 2505L 2530L 2555L 2580L green - Phase 1 (access) yellow - Phase 2 (ore/waste handling system + mine infrastructure) purple Phase 3 (mine development & production ramp-up to 60%) black existing infrastructure 52 162 6 173 2405L 2515L 2555L 2605L loading pocket 2635L shaft bottom Ventilation Flow = 176 m 3 /s Bulk Air Cooler (BAC) = 13.3 MWr Condensing Spray Chamber (CSC) = 18.3 MWr Ventilation Fan Power = 5,800 kw Refrigeration Power = 3,400 kw total = 9,200 kw 15 Why Battery Electric Mining Vehicles? Improved Vehicle Characteristics No emissions Improved Performance Less Noise Simpler Machinery Less Wear and Tear Less Maintenance Benefit to Mining Health Benefits Less pollutants / particulates Quieter Less Ventilation Reduce Size & Number of Ventilation Openings Reduce size of refrigeration plant Less heating of mine air in winter (if required) Overall Lower Energy Usage and Cost Improved Productivity Subjective at present but mostly due to health benefits 16 S3P1 8
Why Battery Electric Mining Vehicles? Estimated CAPEX savings: Vent & Cooling Infrastructure $24M Size $ 5M Drift Size $12M $41M CAPEX additions: Mobile Equipment Premium $21M (current assumption 140% of diesel fleet) Charging Infrastructure $ 5M? $26M Estimated OPEX savings: Fan & Refrigeration Power Cost Natural Gas Cost Operating/Maintenance Cost $7.3M / year $0.3M / year $0.3M / year $7.9M / year 17 40000 Onaping Depth - Power Consumption / Quarter (MWh) 35000 30000 Note One 3000HP Fan Running Continually = Approximately 5000MWh Per Quarter 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 MWh/Q (All Other Loads) MWh/Q (EV Charging) S3P1 9
Concerns and Challenges Vehicles Lower Energy Density Slower Refueling Time Capital Cost of Equipment Availability of Equipment Challenges to Mining Duty vs Battery Charge Cycle. Shift Design around Equipment Capabilities and Limitations Cultural change. Need to break addiction to convenience of fossil fuels. Infrastructure and Logistics Parking Charging 19 Path Forward and Challenges: Confirmation of vent flow and heat load requirements at Feasibility Study Level OEM technology development roadmap Equipment Cost Hauling up ramp still has challenges at this time Mine infrastructure to support full mine battery electric fleet ocharging stations for battery change out? o Quick change o Large scale infrastructure to support 80+ units oon-board battery charging? o Flexibility, reduced infrastructure o Charge time 20 S3P1 10
Thank you S3P1 11