County Intermediate Punishment Plan Update

Similar documents
Driving Under the Influence House Sub. for SB 6

The Drinking Driver Program

Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing. Sentencing Guideline Software Web Version Training Manual

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES

Michigan DUI Courts Outcome Evaluation

CITY OF MCLOUTH, KANSAS DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL DIVERSION PROGRAM

62nd Legislature AN ACT ENCOURAGING DUI COURT PARTICIPATION; REVISING PENALTIES FOR DRIVING UNDER THE

WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session. FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised

Department of Legislative Services

Electronic Monitoring in DWI Courts

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

Volusia County DUI Court Daytona Beach, FL

SENATE BILL 265 A BILL ENTITLED. Vehicle Laws Young Drivers Driving Privileges

The judge must hold a sentencing hearing to determine if there are aggravating or mitigating factors that affect the sentence.

MELANIE S LAW The New OUI Law

ASSEMBLY JOINT RESOLUTION No. 64 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES

PLEA NEGOTIATIONS. Sherry Levin Wallach, Esq. Wallach & Rendo LLP Mount Kisco, NY

LEGAL BARRIERS TO PRISONER REENTRY IN NEW JERSEY

Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs

Treatment Research Institute Annual Progress Report: 2009 Formula Grant

IGNITION INTERLOCK PROGRAM

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

NEW MEXICO S EFFORTS AGAINST DWI

INSTRUCTIONS - - Drug Prison In/Out Worksheet

March 2008 Report No

Travels Through the Transportation Code: Rules of the Road

WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY POLICY

APPA Presentation Feb. 28, 2012 San Diego, CA. Intensive DWI Supervision Program

ITSMR Research Note. Recidivism in New York State: A Status Report ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION KEY FINDINGS RECIDIVISM RATES

Best Practices to Reducing Suspended and Revoked Drivers 2013 Region IV Conference Broomfield, CO

2000 DWI Law Recodification

Alcohol Ignition Interlocks: Research, Technology and Programs. Robyn Robertson Traffic Injury Research Foundation NCSL Webinar, June 24 th, 2009

Why monitor compliance?

Crisis Intervention Team. Miami-Dade County

Tools of the Trade. Victoria Hauan, Impaired Driving Program Manager, Office of Traffic Safety

APPENDIX I Motor Vehicle Point and Surcharge Regulations CHAPTER 19. COMPLIACE AND SAFETY

A. It is unlawful for a person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive a vehicle within this state.

SENATE BILL 803. (1lr0342) ENROLLED BILL Judicial Proceedings/Judiciary

A GUIDE TO SUSPENSION & REVOCATION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES IN NEW YORK STATE

HOUSE BILL lr0078 A BILL ENTITLED. Vehicle Laws Young Drivers Driving Privileges

Learning Objectives. Become familiar with: Elements of DWI offenses Implied consent Chemical test evidence Case law

Cut DUI Recidivism for Good: A Multi-Track DUI Court Approach to Repeat Offenders

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

Driver s License Issues for University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Employment & Training Institute

The Basics of Missouri DWI Law. Presenter: Jason Korner

Risk Control at United Fire Group

Refining Ignition Interlock Laws and Programs: Increasing State Interlock Program Participation

IC Chapter 5. Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated

LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

Florida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview

OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES EFFECTIVE

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 53 CHAPTER

OWI countermeasure that saves lives and taxpayers money while allowing offenders to be part of society and provide for their family.

Drivers License Status Report for Milwaukee County

CASE NO. PETITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL DRIVER S LICENSE

Business and Noninstructional Operations

House Bill 2102 Sponsored by Representative HUFFMAN (Presession filed.)

1 SB By Senator McClendon. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 20-APR-17. Page 0

Commercial Driver s License Laws

Remedial and Ignition Interlock Programs Policies and Guidelines

COUNTERMEASURES THAT WORK:

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF ELKO, COUNTY OF ELKO, STATE OF NEVADA

Options Exist to Modify Use of Driver License Suspension for Non-Driving-Related Reasons

Mandated Substance Abuse Treatment for Ignition Interlock Users. Does it Reduce Recidivism?

POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RULES

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION {Indicate if analysis is on an original bill, amendment, substitute or a correction of a previous bill}

SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS

VEHICULAR HOMICIDES & ASSAULTS VII. VEHICULAR HOMICIDES, MANSLAUGHTERS, & ASSAULTS

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. Code and Weil's Code of D.C. Municipal Regulations (CDCR)

New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

STUDIES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IGNITION INTERLOCKS

Virginia Association for Pupil Transportation. Legislation Committee Report June 2012

April Report Number: S Dear Mr. Bellone and Members of the Legislature:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1987 SESSION CHAPTER 1112 HOUSE BILL 2489

Impaired Driving and Ignition Interlocks

Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board CODE BOOK

Service Delivery Strategy

A) New zero tolerance drug presence laws for young and novice drivers. Create a new regulation to define and permit the use of federally

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS POLICY 28. REGULATION OF PARKING AND TRAFFIC West Virginia University and Its Regional Campuses

Alcohol-Impaired Driving Facts

17C-5-2 Illegal Per Se Law (BAC/BrAC): C-5-2 Persons Under 21 Years Old.02 but <.08 17C-5-2(h) Presumption (BAC/BrAC):.

COUNTY ATTORNEY SENTENCING FOR THE WEEK OF 6/4/2018

STATUTORY AND ADMINSTRATIVE RULES GOVERNING THE BREATH ALCOHOL IGNITION DEVICE (BAIID) FOR MONITORED DEVICE DRIVING PERMITS

A. Travel between the place where the Authority vehicle is dispatched and the area where official Authority business is performed.

Dutch Alcohol Interlock Program

DATE ISSUED: 9/13/ of 5 LDU DBA(REGULATION)-X

What were they thinking? DUI Offenders Tell All

19 May 2015, Luxembourg

Driver's License Issues and Recommendations

Pennsylvania s Ignition Interlock Limited License Expanded and Remodeled

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM

Impaired Driving. Tough consequences Impaired Driver Assessments

Driving JUST THE FACTS. consumed. driving crash. 2. An average of In 2016, a total. BAC=.08+ Drivers Involved. State. Number. Number Percent.

Home Model Legislation Public Safety and Elections

Transcription:

County Intermediate Punishment Plan Update 2013-2014 1. Assessment of available countywide correctional services and future needs The Allegheny County Jail (ACJ) is a detention and incarceration facility based on a podular (pods) design with direct supervision. The ACJ has 35 living units/pods on eight two-level floors. (ACJ Annual Report, 2005). It opened with capacity of 1,850, but provided for expansion up to 2400 inmates. Parallel to the national trend, the average daily inmate number in the ACJ has risen steadily throughout the past decade. During typical days, the number of releases tends to be slightly fewer than admissions. Thus, the population of the jail continues to grow and frequently exceeds 2,500 inmates. The use of alternative housing sites, with a capacity of 320 beds, keeps the population from being even higher. In addition to alternative housing at the jail, the Adult Probation Department s Electronic Monitoring (EM) unit is used to reduce the jail population. The jail population would be considerably larger were it not for electronic monitoring being available for Restrictive Intermediate Punishment (RIP) sentences. Electronic monitoring provides an alternative to the mandatory jail sentences for RIP eligible cases, including Driving Under the Influence (DUI) sentences, Drug Court, DUI Court, and Driving Under Suspension (DUS) when the suspension was given for driving under the influence (these DUS cases are also referred to as 1543(b) cases based on the section of Pennsylvania vehicle code). Due to the tremendous increase between 2007 and 2011 in the number of offenders ordered to restrictive intermediate punishment with electronic monitoring in Allegheny County, particularly for DUI offenses, the Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania developed an alternative intermediate punishment program for the short-term EM offender population serving 48-72 hour sentences. Details of this DUI Alternative to Jail Program are detailed in Section 4 of this plan. In addition to intermediate punishment sentences, which as stated above include Drug Court and DUI Court offenders, electronic monitoring is ordered for pretrial defendants as a condition of bail, probation and parole detainees, offenders sentenced to the jail, probation and parole violation sanctions, Veterans and Mental Health Court cases, and Family Division cases placed on EM for failure to pay support. With the creation of Sex Offender Court in 2011, electronic monitoring supervision, with and without GPS, is being used to enhance supervision strategies with this high-risk offender group. In November 2010, over 1000 offenders were on a wait list for electronic monitoring due to an increase in the number of eligible offenders for Restrictive Intermediate Punishment in Allegheny County. Due to efforts by the Court and Probation Department, the wait list was eliminated by the end of 2011.

Currently, the Courts are limited in the range of Restricted Intermediate Punishments that they can levy and have relied heavily on electronic monitoring. In 2012, Allegheny County added the Therapeutic Housing Program at the Renewal Center that provides work release and treatment through therapeutic alternatives to incarceration for adults in the criminal justice system serving Restrictive Intermediate Punishment sentences. Restrictive Intermediate Punishment Therapeutic Housing Program: The Court recognizes the value in combining strict supervision of offenders with work and treatment. This combination improves public safety by restricting the offender as he/she addresses the underlying issues, and it allows them to maintain their connection with employment and family so that they can leave the program with positive connections to the community and pay restitution and fees. This housing alternative approach is an evidence-based program. At a minimum, this alternative to incarceration provides a therapeutic environment composed of safe and secure housing with a structured living environment and visits with family; work release and job placement; access to substance abuse treatment; and support and reentry planning for successful transition to life in the community. The main outcomes monitored (in addition to monitoring compliance with the contractual agreement) are: (1) successful completion of sentence; (2) recidivism within 12 months of release from the facility; and, (3) number of absconders from the facility. Other outcomes including, but not limited to, job placement and treatment outcomes, are required and have been developed in consultation with the Renewal Center. To reinforce the rules that govern alternative housing and place responsibility squarely upon the offender for retaining the privilege of alternative housing, the Court of Common Pleas and the Allegheny County Jail strictly enforce a policy on absconders. Target Groups for Therapeutic Housing: Restrictive Intermediate Punishment. A. Men and women who are DUI offenders and have a mandatory minimum sentence of 5, 10, 30 or 90 days. In 2010, there were 987 offenders sentenced to Restricted Intermediate Punishment in this category, broken down as follows: 33-5 day sentences, 12-10 day sentences, 186-30 day sentences, and 756-90 day sentences. Individuals who fall within these categories are for: 2nd offense, Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 levels and 3rd offense, Tier 1 and Tier 2 levels. B. Restricted intermediate punishments for non-violent male and female offenders. Offenders who have committed offenses that would warrant a county sentence but who do not demonstrate a present or past pattern of violent behavior. In 2010, there were 548 of these offenders. Maximum length of sentence: 180 days Future Needs: Electronic monitoring supervision is a critical component to the success of county intermediate punishment sentences. Between July 1 and December 31, 2012, there was an average of 638 Restrictive Intermediate Punishment offenders who otherwise would have been incarcerated as level 3 and 4 offenders under the Pennsylvania Sentencing Commission guidelines, but were supervised by electronic monitoring probation officers. Despite the implementation of alternatives to electronic monitoring such as Therapeutic Housing and the DUI Alternative to Jail Program for RIP eligible offenders, the Electronic 2

Monitoring probation officers supervising RIP offenders continue to have very high caseloads. Although the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) provides funding support under two separate Restrictive Intermediate Punishment grants, the County Intermediate Punishment grant pays only a portion of salaries and none of the benefits for a manager, supervisor, six probation officers, and two support personnel. A second grant for Drug Court provides funds for only three additional probation officers who are assigned to Drug Court cases. Additional PCCD grant funding is needed to add at least three electronic monitoring probation officers to supervise this large population of restrictive intermediate punishment offenders who are being diverted from potential sentences of incarceration. 2. Review of current sentencing procedures and the impact these procedures have on county correctional resources. The Adult Probation Department s 2012 year-end statistics illustrate the following sentencing practices in Allegheny County: Probation = 18,328 offenders Parole = 1,096 offenders Intermediate Punishment = 1,555 offenders ARD = 4,083 offenders Probation Without Verdict = 353 offenders Additional sentencing procedures consist of total incarceration at the Allegheny County Jail and use of Alternative Housing programs for inmates sentenced to the jail. As stated in #1 above, the jail population frequently exceeds 2,500 inmates. The use of electronic monitoring and alternative housing reduces the jail population. 3. Review of current alternatives to pretrial detention and the potential these programs have for affecting the jail population In January of 2007, the Allegheny County Pretrial Services Department was created. Bail Services is a division of the Allegheny County Pretrial Services Department and is divided into three separate units. The bail investigative unit conducts all initial investigations at the Allegheny County Jail; the bail liaison unit is responsible for all presentations of bail matters to the court; and the pretrial supervision unit is charged with the task of supervising all defendants who are court ordered to pretrial supervision. The mission of Allegheny County Pretrial Services is to provide accurate and timely information to assist the Court in making informed decisions regarding bond, competency, and treatment. Bail Services works to supervise and monitor defendants in a respectful manner, utilizing cost-effective measures for the community and promoting compliance with court orders, court appearances, while supporting public safety (www.alleghenycourts.us/criminal/pretrial_services/default.aspx). 3

Electronic Monitoring serves as an alternative to Pretrial detention for offenders ordered to EM pending the adjudication of pending charges. During the 2012 calendar year, 53 pretrial defendants completed pretrial electronic monitoring, averaging a mean number of 101.1 days. As of December 31, 2012, there were 40 individuals on pretrial electronic monitoring. 4. Description of the existing resources in the county which can be used as intermediate punishment or services to offenders sentenced to intermediate punishment Allegheny County's Intermediate Punishment Program applies the following two approaches in meeting intermediate punishment objectives. Provide electronic monitoring (EM) supervision for the number of offenders eligible for Restrictive Intermediate Punishment in Allegheny County Continue the use of non-electronic intensive supervision, which allows a step-down to less restrictive levels of supervision when appropriate. The Electronic Monitoring unit is in its 25th year of operation. The unit has two managers, 4 supervisors, 28 probation officers, a drug court coordinator, a DUI court coordinator, 11 fulltime support staff members and 7 part-time monitoring staff. The office operates 24 hours a day/seven days a week and monitors the emergency telephone number for Adult Probation Services. The officers in the EM unit screen cases referred by the court for electronic monitoring, install the monitoring equipment, set the conditions of supervision, and work directly with offenders in the community. Probation officers assist offenders so that the offenders have the opportunity to become contributing members of the community. Probation officers closely monitor offenders so that conditions of supervision ordered by the Court are enforced. Offenders who violate the rules of electronic monitoring receive sanctions that could lead to a revocation hearing before the court and incarceration in jail. Regarding the Drug and DUI Problem-solving Courts, the following model is in place: Identification by the DA s office of level 3 and level 4 offenders with substance use disorders that meet the statutory requirements for county intermediate punishment as specified in 42 Pa.C.S.A. 9802 under "Eligible offender" Assessment and evaluation to determine the necessary level of treatment and to conduct treatment monitoring via case management Referral to treatment programs/services as part of the Restrictive Intermediate Punishment sentence Restrictive Intermediate Punishment supervision provided by the Adult Probation Department Treatment oversight/monitoring via case management. Although primarily involved in the identification and supervision of and Drug/DUI Court cases and other intermediate punishment offenders on electronic monitoring and nonelectronic supervision, it is important to note that the electronic monitoring unit also works 4

with other offender supervision categories on EM. These additional case types include defendants on pretrial EM status, detained probation and parole violation cases referred to as detainer cases, offenders sentenced to the Allegheny County Jail but serving the sentence on EM, and probation and parole sanctions. The EM unit had 736 offenders assigned to it as of the end of December 2012. The increasing number of EM cases continually presents challenges for the unit. Nevertheless, statistics for calendar year 2012 have demonstrated that the unit has been successful thus far in meeting the challenges. During the entire year, 1,809 new offenders were assigned to Electronic Monitoring and 1,984 offenders successfully completed the program. During this period, only 34 participants were arrested on new charges, putting offender recidivism (new arrest) while on electronic monitoring at just 1.7 % for the year. In 2010, Allegheny County added the DUI Alternative to Jail Program. The program is informally referred to as The DUI Hotel and is structured so that offenders serve restrictive intermediate punishment sentences at the DUI Hotel program for convictions of eligible DUI offenses. The goals of the program are to reduce DUI recidivism among offenders who attend this program; provide an alternative to electronic monitoring and incarceration in the county jail for eligible DUI offenders; reduce the total number of short-term electronic monitoring sentences imposed by the court on eligible DUI offenders; enable DUI offenders who are sentenced to the program to complete alcohol education classes and mandated alcohol treatment to fulfill their Alcohol Highway Safety Program requirements; provide substantive education to DUI offenders pertaining to the individual and societal costs of driving under the influence; provide cognitive-based interventions to DUI offenders to positively influence their future behavior in regard to driving under the influence; and to collaborate with other stakeholders who are currently involved in the prosecution, treatment, and punishment of convicted DUI offenders. Convicted DUI offenders eligible for restrictive intermediate punishment sentences in lieu of minimum sentences of 48 hours and 72 hours of incarceration are the targets of this program. Convicted DUI offenders are sentenced to this program in lieu of jail or electronic monitoring and pay a set fee, which covers their Intermediate Punishment treatment requirements, the hotel room and food. Offenders who fail to successfully complete this program are returned to court for re-sentencing. Currently, the program operates out of two local hotels with class sizes of up to 90 participants per month. Each session s program is conducted from Thursday evening through Sunday evening. The DUI Hotel sentencing alternative has contributed to eliminating the wait list for Electronic Monitoring supervision in Allegheny County that had reached over 1000 offenders before the program began. 5. Formulation of policy statements targeted to the needs identified by the county and the impact these policies will have on the use of confinement and intermediate punishment. Allegheny County Adult Probation Department s mission is to provide effective community based alternatives to incarceration, improve public safety, partner with community and law enforcement resources and promote positive behavioral changes from offenders. Allegheny 5

County s intermediate punishment program supports the organization s mission by its commitment to reducing the jail population through the effective supervision of eligible offenders placed on electronic monitoring and intensive supervision. 6. The development of goals and objectives, which are aimed at effective utilization of existing and projected correctional resources. To reduce the jail population through effective supervision practices focused on public safety and the rehabilitation of offenders To place eligible offenders sentenced to intermediate punishment on electronic monitoring without undue delay To effectively manage the electronic monitoring population, especially with intermediate punishment cases, which is the largest offender group being placed on electronic monitoring 7. The development of an evaluation strategy, which measures the qualitative and quantitative performances of all programs. Electronic Monitoring performance measures are submitted to the Allegheny County Jail Oversight Board on a monthly basis. The statistics include the population of the various case supervision types on EM, outcome measures for those who complete EM, the amount collected in administrative EM fees, and number of jail days saved through the use of EM. In addition, periodic reports are submitted to the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, which measure the performance of the intermediate punishment program. 6