Agenda Item. ITEM TYPE: Report BOARD AGENDA ITEM. TITLE: Transportation Services Benchmark Report. DATE: December 13, 2017

Similar documents
Carroll County Public Schools Transportation Services Department

Wyoming School Funding Model Recalibration: Transportation Reimbursement Model Study

The Funding of Pupil Transportation In North Carolina March, 2001

How to Cut Costs in Transportation

An Overview of Transportation Responsibility

The Quality. Link. Florida School District Transportation Profiles. Volume

The Quality. Link. Florida School District Transportation

TheQuality. Link. Florida School District Transportation

L O S A N G E L E S U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T. Business Services Division Transportation Branch BUS REPLACEMENT PLAN

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement to Purchase Compressed Natural Gas Articulated Buses. Staff Report

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Transportation Update. Binford Sloan, Director of Transportation, October 9, 2018 Presented to School Board

WEIGHTS FOR FTE FUNDING FORMULA INIT FY13

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Pupil Transportation Routing Study

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Activity # 91

Sustainable Transportation At Stony Brook University Friday, September 21, 2012 SUNY Sustainability Conference Syracuse Center of Excellence

Grant Opportunities for Vehicle-based Projects in the Bay Area

Milwaukee County Transit System

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

1.963 Report: A Sustainable Transportation Plan for MIT Campus May 2007

Orcutt Union School District

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

1. Trends in the current fiscal year and previous fiscal year 3. Business overview 2. Secular trends in first quarter financial results

Prepared by Transportation Workgroup members: Derek Lewis, Lisa Wells, Chuck Saylors, Lynda Leventis-Wells

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System. William R. Spraul Chief Operating Officer, Transit Services

Martha s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

FY2/18 2Q(March 2017~August 2018)

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Rotary Club of Stuttgart Tuesday, April 7, 2015

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

MOTION No. M Purchase of Five 40-foot Buses PROPOSED ACTION

Asset Class 2019 Target 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target 2023 Target REVENUE VEHICLES AB - Articulated Bus N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION FOR. Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

Getting the Board on the bus

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

Winston-Salem State University

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Solano County Transit

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

Battery Bus Feasibility. Jan 29, 2018

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Paratransit Overview O & O Presentation January 11, 2018

Operating and Maintenance Cost Methodology Report. Durham Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Propane Diesel Injection. An introduction overview of the Powershot Propane Diesel Injection system (PDI) for use in medium and heavy duty vehicles

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Chapter 6 - Capital Improvement Program

DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE RULE

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

2019 New Transit Service Plan

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

6 Mobility Plus Annual Service Plan

FY2/17 3Q(March 2016~November2016)

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Introduction. Mustang Express Service Model

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Incentives for Green Fleets

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

Beachwood City Schools

Transportation Effects of Consolidation September 21, 2016

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES: Street Project Management

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Asset Class 2019 Target 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target 2023 Target REVENUE VEHICLES AB Articulated Bus AO Automobile BR Over the road Bus

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

FPL Electric Vehicle Initiatives

When your work speaks for itself, don t interrupt.

Virginia Department of Education. A Regulatory View of Virginia Pupil Transportation

UC Santa Cruz TAPS 3-Year Fee & Fare Proposal, through

1

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Wherever Your Path May Lead. RTS Takes You There! Citizen s Academy April 2017

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

Commuter Vanpool Program Scope of Work

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT EXTENSION OF EXISTING DIAL-A-RIDE PILOT PROJECT AND STOCK TRANSPORTATION SCHOOL BUS CONTRACTS

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

The Use of GPS to Optimize the Mobile Fleet. We provide the right equipment at the right place and the right time.

Off road and On road Diesel Regulations

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

NOTICE OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED BOARD MEETINGS

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Recommend to Board. Final Action

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

APPROVE VANPOOL VEHICLE SUPPLIER BENCH CONTRACTS

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

Running Head: FEASIBILITY OF MULTI-SCHOOL DISTRICT BUS SHARING 1

At-A-Glance MEDIA INFORMATION GUIDE

Department of the Treasury Division of Administration Transportation Services State Central Motor Pool

UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE Campus Planning and Transportation Services

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

FY2/18 (March 2017~February 2018)

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan Planning the Future of Transit in Our Region

BENCHMARKING URBAN TRANSPORT-A STRATEGY TO FULFIL COMMUTER ASPIRATION

Transcription:

Agenda Item ITEM TYPE: Report BOARD AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Transportation Services Benchmark Report DATE: December 13, 2017 OVERVIEW: A recommendation from a past legislative audit stated that, Carroll County Public Schools should develop, track, and report to the Board formal performance measures and related results that provide essential operational and financial information regarding student transportation services. Accordingly, Transportation Services has created a data base of operational and financial benchmarks. A comparison of counties that utilize a contractor formula has been created. These assessments/benchmarks are shared on an annual basis with the Board of Education. Transportation Services continues to improve operational efficiency and cost effectiveness. FISCAL IMPACT: None Submitted by: Michael J. Hardesty, Director of Transportation Services Approve/Concur: Jonathan D. O Neal, Asst. Superintendent of Administration Stephen H. Guthrie, Superintendent of Schools

CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS TRANSPORTATION BENCHMARKS REPORT SCHOOL YEAR 2016-2017 December 13, 2017 1

FACT SHEET FY 2016 Compared to FY 2017 Miles Traveled: 5,326,580 Increased 43,156 Schools Serviced: Eligible Students: 62 24,776 Decreased 2 Decreased 213 Population of County: 173,732 Increased 1492* Operating Budget: $18,195,446 Increase $725,473 Regular Ed Buses: 191 -Contractor Operated: 191 Decreased 3 Special Ed Buses: 71 No Change -Contractor Operated: 71 No Change Spare/Activity Buses: 59 Decreased 5 Average Age of Fleet: 6.2 years Decreased 0.3 Number of Contractors: 52 No change *Source: http://carrollbiz.org/datacenter/demographics/communitypopulation.php 2016 vs 2017 count 2

PVA and Avg. Cost of CCPS Contractor Buses PVA Increase vs. Average CCPS Contractor Bus Cost $120,000 Avg Cost of Bus PVA $101,000 $105,800 $105,388 $100,000 $91,992 $95,095 $95,521 $86,536 $111,228 $107,498 $108,679 $80,000 $77,384 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $13,155 $14,711 $15,639 $16,166 $16,239 $17,170 $17,986 $17,916 $18,275 $18,503 $18,909 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fiscal Year 3

Cost Effectiveness: Regular Ed Regular Ed: Cost per Eligible Student & cost per Actual Ridership $650 $600 $550 $500 $450 $400 $350 $300 $547 $555 $560 $459 $578 $582 $590 $479 $469 $475 $482 $470 $611 $501 Cost per Eligible Student Cost per Actual Student 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Regular Ed: Cost per Bus $60,503 $60,690 $60,636 $59,410 $61,059 $49,423 $51,609 Student Population 28000 27304 27036 26667 27000 26290 25856 25581 25558 26000 25309 25141 25256 24801 25000 24393 23932 23702 24000 23000 21843 22000 21449 21065 21000 20474 20196 20000 19529 19457 19000 Total Student Population Regular Ed Eligible for Transport Regular Ed Actual Riders $3.55 $3.50 $3.45 $3.40 $3.35 $3.30 $3.25 $3.20 $3.15 $3.10 Regular Ed: Cost per Mile $3.51 $3.41 $3.39 $3.40 $3.38 $3.35 $3.24 4

Cost Effectiveness: Special Ed In/Out-of-County Cost per Student $25,000 $21,084 $19,773 $19,693 $20,000 $17,898 $17,564 $13,615 $15,000 $23,424 $10,000 $5,530 $6,429 $6,821 $6,794 $6,279 $5,737 $5,708 $5,000 $0 Out-of-County Cost per Student In-County Cost per Student # Students Transported on Special Ed Buses 900 795 765 779 800 699 711 638 661 700 600 500 400 300 200 119 100 71 67 73 77 79 79 0 In-County Out-of-County $4.50 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 Special Education Cost per Mile $3.72 $3.60 $3.81 $3.86 $3.83 $3.94 $3.93 $2.43 $2.55 $2.61 $2.63 $2.58 $2.52 $2.88 In-County Out-of-County Special Education: Cost per Bus $101,259 $93,560 $105,406 $88,230 $87,103 $91,514 $84,256 $87,640 $86,417 $83,692 $86,367 $85,857 $81,273 $81,813 In-County Out-of-County 5

5,450,000 5,400,000 5,350,000 5,300,000 5,250,000 5,200,000 5,150,000 5,100,000 5,050,000 5,000,000 4,950,000 5,383,750 5,374,463 Cost Effectiveness: Other Items Total Miles Traveled 5,290,947 5,137,004 5,169,702 5,112,477 5,326,580 5,283,424 FY 2010 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $0.00 $1.20 Avg M/O Cost Per Mile $1.35 $1.42 $1.45 $1.46 $1.35 $1.22 $1.26 FY 2010 CGCS: Cost per Mile Min $1.84 Med $4.31 Max $12.3 $18,500,000 $18,000,000 $17,500,000 $17,000,000 $16,578,374 $16,500,000 $16,000,000 $15,500,000 Operating Expenditures $18,118,827 $18,195,446 $17,743,068 $17,632,083 $17,474,878 $17,580,313 $17,469,973 FY 2010 6 $4.50 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 Avg cost per gallon diesel fuel $3.87 $3.89 $3.88 $3.42 $3.17 $2.68 $2.41 $2.24 FY 2010

Cost Effectiveness: Students in Transition Students in Transition: Cost # Students in Transition $120,000 $110,820 120 111 $100,000 100 91 $80,000 $60,000 $68,600 $80,800 $70,714 $78,334 80 60 63 65 69 $40,000 $42,900 40 38 $20,000 20 $0 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 0 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 7

Capacity Utilization Target Capacity Elementary: 58 Middle: 51 High: 44 Capacity Utilization: Planned and Actual Avg # of Buses per 100 Students Enrolled 100% % Planned: 95% Eligible Riders 91% 90% 85% 80% 75% 75% 76% 88% 87% 86% 85% 85% 73% 83% 77.5% Performance Goal: Planned 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.73 0.74 0.75 0.76 1.15 Avg Performance Goal 70% 65% 71% 70% 68% 68% 65.0% % Capacity: Actual Riders 0.70 0.60 60% 0.50 Performance Goal: Actual Performance Guidelines from State Benchmarking 8 Spreadsheet for Formula Counties

Routing Efficiency Avg. Daily Deadhead per Bus(Regular Ed) Avg. Daily Mileage per Bus(Regular Ed) 31.0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 23.0 30.0 29.1 29.1 28.0 27.3 25.8 26.2 120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 98.7 99.0 101.7 103 81.2 81.8 81.7 6.2 Avg. # of Hours per Bus (Regular Ed) 7.0 Avg. # of Trips per Bus (Regular Ed) 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 6.1 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.9 5.2 5.2 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.0 4.9 4.9 9

Safety 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 Preventable Accidents with Injury or Damage >$1500 per Million Miles Traveled 5 0.9 11 13 10 8 8 2.1 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.9 FY 2010 9 10 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 98 39 59 Bus Accident Totals 80 79 83 85 70 59 55 56 58 58 37 42 25 22 28 23 25 27 Non-Preventable Preventable Total PI or AD per Million Miles Traveled # of Preventable Accidents with PI or AD 1400 1200 1000 # AngelTrax Systems & # of Referrals 1214 1205 1151 1091 966 970 800 # of Referrals 600 # of Buses 400 200 180 297 323 326 324 322 0 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 10 FY 2016 FY 2017

Statewide Comparison: SY 2016-2017 Cost 5Hrs/80Mi versus 5.75Hrs/80Mi and PVA 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 $58,362 $55,631 $57,281 $54,642 Cost 5 Hours 80 Miles Cost 5.75 Hours 80 Miles PVA 30,000 Average 5/80 Average 5.75/80 20,000 $16,137 Average PVA 10,000 0 11

Statewide Comparison: SY 2016-2017 Maintenance and Fuel Costs 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1.45 1.49 1.33 1.34 1.33 1.35 1.24 1.21 1.20 1.25 1.15 1.13 1.05 1.11 1.23 1.05 0.99 0.90 0.83 0.92 1.02 0.99 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.80 0.83 0.70 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.82 0.65 0.67 0.51 0.32 0.35 0.38 0.42 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.24 Maintenance Fuel Total M&F Average M&F 12

Statewide Comparison: SY 2016-2017 $25 $23 $21 $19 $17 $15 $19.2 $24.1 $21.8 $20.2 $19.8 Driver Salaries per Hour $22.6 $19.2 $19.1 $20.5 $20.9 $19.8 $18.3 $20.6 $21.1 $19.2 $19.6 Driver Salary Average Salary $10,015 Admin Fee Operations $8,015 $6,015 $4,015 $2,015 $15 $7,843 $800 $2,824 $1,100 $1,400 $675 $900 $2,990 $1,030 $5,440 $450 $800 $6,337 $1,560 $3,500 Admin Fee Average Admin Fee 13

Questions? 14