ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Similar documents
Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 18, 2017

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

~ u..v Q- c./ Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Engineer/Public Works Director to install parking lot speed bumps on Hall Park Drive.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Design Endorsement for Sterling Boulevard Extension

MSRC CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP

Agenda. Utility Undergrounding Strategies & Laguna Canyon Road Master Plan

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

Schedule Based on the City of Los Angeles, the District should be formed by April 2016 to allow the design and construction to be complete by 2019.

Proposed HRTAC FY2018 FY2023 Plan of Finance Update

LACEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 09, 2015

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

April 18, Mr. David Schmit, County Manager Arapahoe County 5334 S. Prince Street Littleton, CO Conoco Phillips Section 6 Swan Well

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Rebecca Irwin AGM Customer Resources

Business Item No

Reston Transportation Strategy July 9, 2018

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 16, 2015

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Report by Planning, Development & Real Estate Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Recommend to Board. Final Action

Driveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

EMERGING REQUIREMENTS

Energy Technical Memorandum

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

W&OD TRAIL BRIDGE OVER LEE HIGHWAY I-66 EASTBOUND WIDENING INSIDE THE BELTWAY FROM THE DULLES CONNECTOR ROAD (ROUTE 267) TO FAIRFAX DRIVE (ROUTE 237)

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

DATE: MAY 3, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION

All territory within the incorporated limits of the City and land owned or leased by the City.

Dear New Clean Cities Stakeholder:

E) That the General Manager be authorized to execute and deliver such documentation on behalf of the Park Board.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

MEMORANDUM DEBBIE MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SEVICES RAUL JUAREZ, FLEET MAINTENANCE COORDINATOR GLENDA BONER, ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY

Decision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement

Public Works Department

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Update on Bus Stop Enhancements

TOWN OF WINDSOR AGENDA REPORT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 24, 2018

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Action 6A: HRTAC FY2018 FY2023 Funding Plan

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 24, 2018

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

Minnesota Avenue Station Parking Garage Repair Project

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL STEVEN N. ANNIBALI, CHIEF OF POLICE

RECOMMENDATION APPROVED; RESOLUTION NO (PERMIT 930) ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS. August 17, 2017

RON ROBERTS SUPERVISOR, FOURTH DISTRICT SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

The cost estimation methodology used to update the charges and credits is the same methodology the Company utilized in the prior year s filing.

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) TNC (Transportation Network Company) Lot on S. Eads Street

City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 13, 2018 Council Session

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Rebecca Irwin Interim AGM Customer Resources. From: Kelly Birdwell Approved by: /s/

Salary Compaction Adjustment Tractor Trailer Driver and Solid Waste Loader Operator Classifications

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 11

Current Corridor Characteristics. MN 62 Corridor Performance

Authorize Public Hearing To Discontinue Non- Regional Metrobus Routes 2W, 12A-S and 20F-Y in Fairfax County

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Governing Board Meeting. June 15, 2017

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

ENERGY STRATEGY FOR YUKON. Net Metering Policy DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, following a public hearing, adopt the attached resolution which:

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 16, 2016

City of Grand Island Tuesday, June 27, 2017 Council Session

Contract Awards for Tender Calls and for the Construction of Works Associated with the City's Basement Flooding Protection Program

City of Grand Island

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 4

Work Session. Agenda Item # 2. Meeting Date April 20, Daryl Braithwaite Public Works Director. Prepared By. Suzanne Ludlow City Manager

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

DRAFT Subject to modifications

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Regarding: North Industrial Park/Infrastructure Build Project - Contractor Payments

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Barry Leska AGM Energy Resource Planning. From: Alan Hanger Approved by: /s/

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Change to the Arlington County Code prohibiting the parking of commercial vehicles and recreational vehicles on residential streets

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: Senior Energy Resources Analyst Deborah Whiteman Senior Energy Resources Analyst Approved by:

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: July 18, 2012

MOTION NO. M Preferred Alternative for the Puyallup Station Access Improvement Project

1) Introduction. a) Name of city/utility Utilities Commission, City of New Smyrna Beach

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

City of Grand Island Tuesday, October 10, 2017 Council Session

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Ketchum Energy Advisory Committee Annual Update and Recommendation for Electric Vehicle Charging Station

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. Advisory Committee Meeting

Transcription:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 24, 2004 DATE: April 14, 2004 SUBJECT: Arlington Boulevard (U.S. 50) Bridge Deck Replacement at Washington Boulevard - Overhead Utility Relocation C. M. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution endorsing the undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines adjacent to the Arlington Boulevard interchange with Washington Boulevard. ISSUE: Whether the County desires to have the existing overhead utility lines relocated underground and at what cost to the County. SUMMARY: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is proposing to replace the deck of the Arlington Boulevard overpass at Washington Boulevard in the fall of 2004 due to its deteriorating condition. VDOT has determined that it is necessary to relocate existing overhead utility lines in order to comply with the Overhead High Voltage Lines Safety Act. To comply, the overhead utility lines could be relocated approximately 135 feet to the west and remain overhead. This would require the trimming and removal of some existing trees in the VDOT right of way along Arlington Boulevard. To save these trees, the overhead utility lines could be relocated underground. It is recommended that Arlington County participate with VDOT in the cost of relocating the utility lines underground in conjunction with the bridge replacement. BACKGROUND: VDOT policy allows for the undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines in conjunction with transportation improvement projects. Under the VDOT policy, the difference between the cost of undergrounding and the estimated cost of moving the overhead utility lines to another overhead location is shared equally between the State and Arlington County. To be eligible for this 50 percent State funding, the transportation improvement project must be located in a locally adopted underground utility district. In addition, the local governing body must request the utility improvement by the project resolution, and commit the financial resources for the locality s 50 percent share of the undergrounding cost. DISCUSSION: VDOT is proposing to redeck the Arlington Boulevard overpass at Washington Boulevard due to its deteriorating condition. One of the County s priority requests has been an County Manager: County Attorney: Staff: David Robinson, Department of Transportation

interchange improvement. However, VDOT has not been able to allocate the substantial amount of funding (about $30 million) for a comprehensive improvement at this location. VDOT has determined that it is necessary to relocate existing overhead utility lines in order to comply with the Overhead High Voltage Lines Safety Act. The overhead utility lines could be relocated approximately 135 feet to the west of the interchange to comply with the Act. The utility lines could be replaced in kind as overhead utility lines, but would require the trimming and removal of existing trees in the VDOT right of way along Arlington Boulevard. With an overhead relocation, VDOT and Dominion Virginia Power (DVP) would be responsible for all of the relocation costs. A site area location map is shown in Figure 1. Alternatively, VDOT could relocate the overhead utility lines underground in conjunction with a transportation improvement project. Both the Arlington and Washington Boulevard Corridors are identified on the adopted Arlington County Underground Utility Plan. VDOT and DVP have developed a cost estimate to underground the overhead utility lines across Arlington Boulevard at Washington Boulevard. Minus the theoretical relocation credit, and DVP easement rights, the total estimated cost is approximately $44,000. The County s share of the estimated cost would be approximately $22,000. The cost estimates are preliminary and subject to change. The final cost and the County s 50 percent share would be determined after the project is completed. Because the County should not agree to pay a share of such undergrounding costs without limitation, the attached resolution limits the County s share to $44,000 which must be subject to appropriation. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded through VDOT using bridge maintenance funds. Project costs are currently estimated to be $4.5 million. These project costs include engineering, utility relocation and bridge construction. If the County wants the existing overhead utility facilities to be placed underground, then the County must agree to pay its 50 percent share of the overhead utility relocation which is presently estimated to be approximately $22,000. The cost estimates are preliminary and subject to change. The final cost and the County s 50 percent share would be determined after the project is completed. Sufficient funds are available in the County s Developer Contributions Utility account to cover the County share of the relocation costs of the project.

Figure 1 Arlington Boulevard Bridge at Washington Boulevard

ATTACHMENT Resolution of the County Board of Arlington, Virginia Concerning Improvements to Arlington Boulevard at Washington Boulevard State Project: 0050-000- WHEREAS, in 2004 the Virginia Department of Transportation ( VDOT ), proposed to develop a project to replace the Arlington Boulevard (U.S. Route 50) bridge deck over Washington Boulevard, also known as State Project: 0050 000 (the Project ); and WHEREAS, VDOT has determined that it is necessary to relocate the existing overhead electric lines to comply with adopted safety standards; and WHEREAS, the County Board of Arlington County, Virginia desires to maintain and enhance existing trees and other landscaping adjacent to Arlington Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Arlington Boulevard and Washington Boulevard Corridors are both located within an underground utility district as adopted by the County Board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the County Board of Arlington County, Virginia requests that VDOT underground existing overhead utilities adjacent to the Project limits in accordance with VDOT s Utility Relocation Policy; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the County Board, subject to appropriation of funds for such specific project, agrees to pay the County s share of the incremental cost of placing the overhead utility facilities adjacent to the Project underground, in accordance with VDOT policy in an amount not to exceed $44,000. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF, 2004. County Board of Arlington, Virginia BY ATTEST