Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
Content Introduction...5 EEDI and Major Ship and Main Engine Parameters...6 Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)...6 Major propeller and engine parameters...7 3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier...9 Main Engine Operating Costs 14.1 knots...1 Fuel consumption and EEDI...1 Operating costs...13 Main Engine Operating Costs 13. knots...14 Fuel consumption and EEDI...14 Operating costs...17 Summary...18
Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier Introduction The main ship particulars of 3, dwt Handysize bulk carriers are normally approximately as follows: the overall ship length is 178 m, breadth 28 m and design/scantling draught 9.5 m/1. m, see Fig. 1. Recent development steps have made it possible to offer solutions which will enable significantly lower transportation costs for Handysize bulk carriers (and tankers) as outlined in the following. One of the goals in the marine industry today is to reduce the impact of CO 2 emissions from ships and, therefore, to reduce the fuel consumption for the propulsion of ships to the widest possible extent at any load. This also means that the inherent design CO 2 index of a new ship, the socalled Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI), will be reduced. Based on an average reference CO 2 emission from existing bulk carriers, the CO 2 emission from new bulk carriers in gram per dwt per nautical mile must be equal to or lower than the reference emission figures valid for the specific bulk carrier. This drive may often result in operation at lower than normal service ship speeds compared to earlier, resulting in reduced propulsion power utilisation. The design ship speed at Normal Continuous Rating (NCR), including 15% sea margin, used to be as high as 14.- 14.5 knots. Today, the ship speed may be expected to be lower, possibly 13 knots, or even lower. A more technically advanced development drive is to optimise the aftbody and hull lines of the ship including bulbous bow, also considering operation in ballast condition. This makes it possible to install propellers with a larger propeller diameter and, thereby, obtaining higher propeller efficiency, but at a reduced optimum propeller speed, i.e. using less power for the same ship speed. Fig. 1: Handysize bulk carrier Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 5
As the two-stroke main engine is directly coupled with the propeller, the introduction of the Green ultra long stroke G4ME-B9.3 engine with even lower than usual shaft speed will meet this goal. The main dimensions for this engine type, and for other existing Handysize bulk carrier (and tanker) engines, are shown in Fig. 2. On the basis of a case study of a 3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier in compliance with IMO Tier II emission rules, this paper shows the influence on fuel consumption when choosing the new G4ME-B engine compared with existing Handysize bulk carrier engines. The layout ranges of 6 and 7G4ME- B9.3 engines compared with 6 and 7S4ME-B9.3 are shown later in Fig. 4. EEDI and Major Ship and Main Engine Parameters Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) The Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) is a mandatory instrument to be calculated and made as available information for new ships contracted after 1 January 212. EEDI represents the amount of CO 2 in gram emitted when transporting one deadweight tonnage of cargo one nautical mile. For bulk carriers, the EEDI value is essentially calculated on the basis of maximum cargo capacity, propulsion power, ship speed, SFOC (Specific Fuel Oil Consumption) and fuel type. However, certain correction factors are applicable, e.g. for installed Waste Heat Recovery systems. To evaluate the achieved EEDI, a reference value for the specific ship type and the specified cargo capacity is used for comparison. The main engine s SFOC incl. tolerance at 75% SMCR (Specified Maximum Continuous Rating) figure is as standard applied in the calculation of the EEDI figure, in which also the CO 2 emission from the auxiliary engines of the ship is included. According to the rules finally decided on 15 July 211, the EEDI of a new ship is reduced to a certain factor compared to a reference value. Thus, a ship built after 225 is required to have a 3% lower EEDI than the reference figure. 1,645 9 7,43 7,589 2,65 2,67 1,488 964 1,41 95 7,96 3,118 G4ME-B9 S4ME-B9 S42MC7 Fig. 2: Main dimensions for a G4ME-B9.3 engine and for other existing Handysize bulk carrier engines 6 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
Major propeller and engine parameters In general, the highest possible propulsive efficiency required to provide a given ship speed is obtained with the largest possible propeller diameter d, in combination with the corresponding, optimum pitch/diameter ratio p/d. As an example, this is illustrated for a 3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier with a service ship speed of 14 knots, see the black curve on Fig. 3. The needed propulsion SMCR (Specified Maximum Continuous Rating) power and speed is shown for a given optimum propeller diameter d and p/d ratio. According to the black curve, the existing propeller diameter of 5. m may have the optimum pitch/diameter ratio of.71, and the lowest possible SMCR shaft power of about 6,7 kw at about 147 r/min. The black curve shows that if a bigger propeller diameter of 6. m is possible, the necessary SMCR shaft power will be reduced to about 6,1 kw at about 15 r/min, i.e. the bigger the propeller, the lower the optimum propeller speed. If the pitch for this diameter is changed, the propulsive efficiency will be reduced, i.e. the necessary SMCR shaft power will increase, see the red curve. The red curve also shows that propulsion-wise it will always be an advantage to choose the largest possible propeller diameter, even though the optimum pitch/diameter ratio would involve a too low propeller speed (in relation to the required main engine speed). Thus, when using a somewhat lower pitch/ diameter ratio, compared with the optimum ratio, the propeller/engine speed may be increased and will only cause a minor extra power increase. Propulsion SMCR power kw 7, 4-bladed FP-propellers d = Propeller diameter p/d = Pitch/diameter ratio Design Ship Speed = 14. kn Design Draught = 9.5 m S4ME-B9.3 5. m S4ME-B9.3.71 d p/d 6,5 G4ME-B9.3 5.5 m p/d 1.5.73.55 6,.95 6.5 m.77.85 6. m.75.65 G4ME-B9.3.6 Power and speed curve for various propeller diameters (d) with optimum p/d ratio Power and speed curve for the given propeller diameter d = 6. m with different p/d ratios SMCR power and speed are inclusive of: 15% sea margin 1% engine margin 5% propeller light running 5,5 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 r/min Engine/propeller speed at SMCR Fig. 3: Influence of propeller diameter and pitch on SMCR for a 3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier operating at 14. knots Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 7
The efficiency of a two-stroke main engine particularly depends on the ratio of the maximum (firing) pressure and the mean effective pressure. The higher the ratio, the higher the engine efficiency, i.e. the lower the Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC). Furthermore, the higher the stroke/bore ratio of a two-stroke engine, the higher the engine efficiency. This means, for example, that an ultra long stroke engine type, as the G4ME-B9.3, may have a higher efficiency compared with a shorter stroke engine type, like an S42MC-C. The application of new propeller design technologies may also motivate use of main engines with lower rpm. Thus, for the same propeller diameter, these propeller types can demonstrate an up to 6% improved overall efficiency gain at about 1% lower propeller speed. This is valid for propellers with Kappel technology available at MAN Diesel & Turbo, Frederikshavn, Denmark. Hence, with such a propeller type, the advantage of the new low speed G4ME-B9.3 engine can be utilised also in case a correspondingly larger propeller cannot be accommodated. Propulsion SMCR power kw 14, 4-bladed FP-propellers constant ship speed coefficient =.29 12, 1, SMCR power and speed are inclusive of: 15% sea margin 1% engine margin 5% light running T des = 9.5 m Possible Dprop=6. m (= 63.2% of T des ) Possible Dprop=5.5 m (= 57.9% of T des ) Existing Dprop=5. m (= 52.6% of T des ) 15. kn 8, 6, 4, 2, M3 M3 7G4ME-B9.3 M2 M = SMCR (14.1 kn) M1 = 6,81 kw 146 r/min, 6S4ME-B9.3 M2 = 6,51 kw 125 r/min, M3 = 6,21 kw 16 r/min, 7G4ME-B9.3 M2 7S4ME-B9.3 6S4ME-B9.3 M1 125 r/min 135 r/min 146 r/min M = SMCR (13. kn) M1 = 5,13 kw 135 r/min, 6S4ME-B9.3 M2 = 4,87 kw 113 r/min, M3 = 4,78 kw 16 r/min, 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 r/min Engine/propeller speed at SMCR M1 13. kn 14.1 kn 14. kn G4ME-B9.3 Bore = 4 mm Stroke = 2, mm V pist = 8.33 m/s S/B = 5. MEP = 21. bar L 1 = 1,1 kw/cyl. at 125 r/min (L 1 = 1,19 kw/cyl. at 135 r/min) Fig. 4: Different main engine and propeller layouts and SMCR possibilities (M1, M2, M3 for 14.1 knots and M1, M2, M3 for 13. knots) for a 3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier operating at 14.1 knots and 13. knots, respectively 8 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier For a 3, dwt Handysize bulk carrier, the following case study illustrates the potential for reducing fuel consumption by increasing the propeller diameter and introducing the G4ME- B9.3 as main engine. The ship particulars assumed are as follows: Scantling draught m 1. Design draught m 9.5 Length overall m 178. Length between pp m 17. Breadth m 28. Sea margin % 15 Engine margin % 1 Design ship speed kn 14.1 and 13. Type of propeller FPP No. of propeller blades 4 Propeller diameter m target Based on the above-stated average ship particulars assumed, we have made a power prediction calculation (Holtrop & Mennen s Method) for different design ship speeds and propeller diameters, and the corresponding SMCR power and speed, point M, for propulsion of the Handysize bulk carrier is found, see Fig. 4. The propeller diameter change corresponds approximately to the constant ship speed factor α =.29 [ref. P M2 = P M1 (n2/n1) α. Referring to the two ship speeds of 14.1 knots and 13. knots, respectively, three potential main engine types, 6S4ME- B9.3, and 7/6G4ME- B9.3 and pertaining layout diagrams and SMCR points have been drawn-in in Fig. 4, and the main engine operating costs have been calculated and described. The S4ME-B9 engine type (146 r/ min) has often been used in the past as prime movers in projects for Handysize bulk carriers. Therefore, a comparison between the new G4ME-B9.3 and the existing S4ME-B9.3 is of major interest in this paper. It should be noted that the ship speed stated refers to NCR = 9% SMCR including 15% sea margin. If based on calm weather, i.e. without sea margin, the obtainable ship speed at NCR = 9% SMCR will be about.5 knots higher. If based on 75% SMCR, as applied for calculation of the EEDI, the ship speed will be about.2 knot lower, still based on calm weather conditions, i.e. without any sea margin. Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 9
Propulsion power demand at N = NCR kw 7, Inclusive of sea margin = 15% Relative power reduction % 14 6, 6,129 kw 5,859 kw 5,589 kw 12 5, 8.8% 1 4, 8 3, 4.4% 6 2, 4 1, 2 Dprop: % 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 5. m 4 N2 5.5 m 4 7G4ME-B9.3 N3 6. m 4 Fig. 5: Expected propulsion power demand at NCR = 9% SMCR for 14.1 knots Main Engine Operating Costs 14.1 knots The calculated main engine examples are as follows: 14.1 knots 1. 6S4ME-B9.3 (D prop = 5. m) M1 = 6,81 kw 146. r/min 2. (D prop = 5.5 m) M2 = 6,51 kw 125. r/min. 3. 7G4ME-B9.3 (D prop = 6. m) M3 = 6,21 kw 16. r/min. The main engine fuel consumption and operating costs at N = NCR = 9% SMCR have been calculated for the above three main engine/propeller cases operating on the relatively high ship speed of 14.1 knots, as often used earlier. Furthermore, the corresponding EEDI has been calculated on the basis of the 75% SMCR-related figures (without sea margin). Fuel consumption and EEDI Fig. 5 shows the influence of the propeller diameter with four propeller blades when going from about 5. m to 6. m. Thus, N3 for the 7G4ME-B9.3 with a 6. m propeller diameter has a propulsion power demand that is about 8.8% lower compared with N1 valid for the 6S4ME-B9.3 with a propeller diameter of about 5. m. 1 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
SFOC g/kwh 188 187 186 185 ME-B9.2 (without VET) IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions LCV = 42,7 kj/kg 184 183 182 Standard high-load optimised engines 181 18 (VET = Variable Exhaust valve Timing) 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 ME-B9.3 (with VET) N1 N2 N3 M1 6S4ME-B9.3 M2 M3 7G4ME-B9.3 Dprop 5. m 4 5.5 m 4 6. m 4 Savings in SFOC.%.2%.6% 17 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1% SMCR Engine shaft power N = NCR M = SMCR For ME-B engines, the fuel consumption (+1g/kWh) for HPS is included. Fig. 6: Expected SFOC for 14.1 knots Fig. 6 shows the influence on the main engine efficiency, indicated by the Specific Fuel Oil Consumption, SFOC, for the three cases. For N3 = 9% M3 with the 7G4ME-B9.3 SFOC is 172. g/ kwh, for N2 = 9% M2 with 6G4ME- B9.3 SFOC is 172.7 g/kwh and for N1 = 9% M1 with 6S4ME-B9.3 SFOC is 173. g/kwh. In all cases for the ME-B engines, +1 g/kwh needed for the Hydraulic Power Supply (HPS) system is included. In N3, the SFOC is about.6% lower compared with N1. All ME-B9.3 engine types are as standard fitted with VET (Variable Exhaust valve Timing) reducing the SFOC at part operation. The corresponding higher SFOC part load curves for engines without VET are also shown. Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 11
When multiplying the propulsion power demand at N (Fig. 5) with the SFOC (Fig. 6), the daily fuel consumption is found and is shown in Fig. 7. Compared with N1 for the existing 6S4ME-B9.3, the total reduction of fuel consumption of the new at N3 is about 9.4% (see also the above-mentioned savings of 8.8% and.6%). The reference and the actual EEDI figures have been calculated and are shown in Fig. 8 (EEDI ref = 961.8 x dwt -.477, 15 July 211). As can be seen for all three cases, the actual EEDI figures are relatively high with the lowest EEDI (98%) for case 3 with 7G4ME-B9.3. IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions t/24h LCV = 42,7 kj/kg % 35 14 For ME-B engines, the fuel consumption for HPS is included. 13 3 12 25.44 t/24h 11 25 24.28 t/24h 23.6 t/24h 1 2 9.4% 9 8 7 15 4.6% 6 5 1 4 3 5 2 % 1 Fuel consumption of main engine Dprop: 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 5. m 4 N2 5.5 m 4 7G4ME-B9.3 N3 6. m 4 Relative saving of fuel consumption Fig. 7: Expected fuel consumption at NCR = 9% SMCR for 14.1 knots CO 2 emissions Reference and actual EEDI gram per dwt/n mile 75% SMCR: 13.9 knots without sea margin Actual/Reference EEDI % 9 EEDI reference EEDI actual 12 8 7.62 11 7.4 18% 7.4 7.28 7.4 6.91 7 13% 1 98% 9 6 8 5 7 4 6 5 3 4 2 3 2 1 1 6S4ME-B9.3 7G4ME-B9.3 Dprop: N1 N2 N3 5. m 4 5.5 m 4 6. m 4 Fig. 8: Reference and actual Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for 14.1 knots 12 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
Annual operating costs Million USD/Year 5 4 IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions 25 days/year NCR = 9% SMCR Fuel price: 7 USD/t 8.7% Maintenance Lub. oil Fuel oil Relative saving in operating costs % 1 9 8 7 3 6 4.4% 5 2 4 3 1 2 Dprop: % 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 5. m 4 N2 5.5 m 4 7G4ME-B9.3 N3 6. m 4 1 Fig. 9: Total annual main engine operating costs for 14.1 knots Saving in operating costs (Net Present Value) Million USD 8 7 6 5 IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions N = NCR = 9% SMCR 25 days/year Fuel price: 7 USD/t Rate of interest and discount: 6% p.a. Rate of inflation: 3% p.a. N3: 6. m 4 7G4ME-B9.3 Operating costs The total main engine operating costs per year, 25 days/year, and fuel price of 7 USD/t, are shown in Fig. 9. The lube oil and maintenance costs are shown too. As can be seen, the major operating costs originate from the fuel costs about 96%. 4 3 2 1 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 Fig. 1: Relative saving in main engine operating costs (NPV) for 14.1 knots N2: 5.5 m 4 N1: 5. m 4 6S4ME-B9.3 Lifetime Years After some years in service, the relative savings in operating costs in Net Present Value (NPV), see Fig. 1, with the existing 6S4ME-B9.3 used as basis with the propeller diameter of about 5. m, indicates an NPV saving for the new 6 and 7G4ME-B9.3 engines. After 25 years in operation, the saving is about 7.1 million USD for N3 with 7G4ME-B9.3 with the SMCR speed of 16. r/min and propeller diameter of about 6. m. Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 13
Propulsion power demand at N = NCR kw 6, Inclusive of sea margin = 15% Relative power reduction % 12 5, 4,617 kw 4,383 kw 4,32 kw 1 4, 6.8% 8 3, 5.1% 6 2, 4 1, 2 Dprop: % 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 5. m 4 N2 5.5 m 4 N3 5.7 m 4 Fig. 11: Expected propulsion power demand at NCR = 9% SMCR for 13. knots Main Engine Operating Costs 13. knots The calculated main engine examples are as follows: 13. knots 1. 6S4ME-B9.3 (D prop = 5. m) M1 = 5,13 kw 135. r/min 2. (D prop = 5.5 m) M2 = 4,87 kw 113. r/min. 3. (D prop = 5.7 m) M3 = 4,78 kw 16. r/min. The main engine fuel consumption and operating costs at N = NCR = 9% SMCR have been calculated for the above three main engine/propeller cases operating on the relatively lower ship speed of 13. knots, which is probably going to be a more normal choice in the future. Furthermore, the EEDI has been calculated on the basis of the 75% SMCR-related figures (without sea margin). Fuel consumption and EEDI Fig. 11 shows the influence of the propeller diameter with four propeller blades when going from about 5. m to 5.7 m. Thus, N3 for the with an about 5.7 m propeller diameter has a propulsion power demand that is about 6.8% lower compared with the N1 for the 6S4ME-B9.3 with an about 5. m propeller diameter. For the three ME-B engine cases, an extra SFOC of +1 g/kwh has been added corresponding to the power demand needed for the Hydraulic Power Supply (HPS) system. 14 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
SFOC g/kwh 182 181 18 179 178 177 176 175 IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions LCV = 42,7 kj/kg Standard high-load optimised engines (VET = Variable Exhaust valve Timing) 174 173 172 171 17 ME-B9.3 (with VET) 169 N1 N2 168 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1% SMCR Engine shaft power N3 Dprop M3 5.7 m 4 M1 6S4ME-B9.3 5. m 4 M2 5.5 m 4 Savings in SFOC -.5%.%.% N = NCR M = SMCR For ME-B engines, the fuel consumption (+1g/kWh) for HPS is included. Fig. 12: Expected SFOC for 13. knots Fig. 12 shows the influence on the main engine efficiency, indicated by the Specific Fuel Oil Consumption, SFOC, for the three cases. N3 = 9% M3 with the has a relatively high SFOC of 17.1 g/kwh compared with the 169.3 g/kwh for N1 = 9% M1 for the 6S4ME-B9.3, i.e. an SFOC increase of about.5%, mainly caused by the greater speed derating potential giving higher mep of the G-engine type, but involving a higher potential propeller efficiency. Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 15
The daily fuel consumption is found by multiplying the propulsion power demand at N (Fig. 11) with the SFOC (Fig. 12), see Fig. 13. The total reduction of fuel consumption of the new 6G4ME- B9.3, N3 with propeller diameter 5.7 m, is about 6.3% compared with the existing 6S4ME-B9.3 (see also the abovementioned savings of 6.8% and.5%). The reference and the actual EEDI figures have been calculated and are shown in Fig. 14 (EEDI ref = 961.8 dwt -.477, 15 July 211). As can be seen for all three cases, the actual EEDI figures are now somewhat lower than the reference figure because of the relatively low ship speed of 13. knots. Particularly, case 3 with has a low EEDI about 81% of the reference figure. Fuel consumption of main engine t/24h 3 25 IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions LCV = 42,7 kj/kg For ME-B engines, the fuel consumption for HPS is included. Relative saving of fuel consumption % 12 9 2 18.76 t/24h 8 17.82 t/24h 17.57 t/24h 7 15 6 5.% 6.3% 5 1 4 5 2 % 1 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 N2 N3 D prop: 5. m 4 5.5 m 4 5.7 m 4 11 1 3 Fig. 13: Expected fuel consumption at NCR = 9% SMCR for 13. knots CO 2 emissions gram per dwt/n mile 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Dprop: 7.4 6.8 86% 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 5. m 4 Reference and actual EEDI 75% SMCR: 12.8 kn without sea margin EEDI reference 7.4 5.77 82% N2 5.5 m 4 EEDI actual 7.4 5.69 81% N3 5.7 m 4 Actual/Reference EEDI % 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Fig. 14: Reference and actual Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for 13. knots 16 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
Annual operating costs Million USD/Year 4 IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions 25 days/year NCR = 9% SMCR Fuel price: 7 USD/t Relative saving in operating costs % 8 3 4.8% 6.1% Maintenance Lub. oil Fuel oil 7 6 5 2 4 3 1 2 Dprop: % 6S4ME-B9.3 N1 5. m 4 N2 5.5 m 4 N3 5.7 m 4 1 Fig. 15: Total annual main engine operating costs for 13. knots Saving in operating costs (Net Present Value) Million USD 6 5 4 3 2 1 IMO Tier ll ISO ambient conditions N = NCR = 9% SMCR 25 days/year Fuel price: 7 USD/t Rate of interest and discount: 6% p.a. Rate of inflation: 3% p.a. 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 Fig. 16: Relative saving in main engine operating costs (NPV) for 13. knots N3 : 5.7 m 4 N2 : 5.5 m 4 N1 : 5. m 4 6S4ME-B9.3 Lifetime Years Operating costs The total main engine operating costs per year, 25 days/year, and fuel price of 7 USD/t, are shown in Fig. 15. Lube oil and maintenance costs are also shown at the top of each column. As can be seen, the major operating costs originate from the fuel costs about 96%. After some years in service, the relative savings in operating costs in Net Present Value, NPV, see Fig. 16, with the existing 6S4ME-B9.3 with the propeller diameter of about 5. m used as basis, indicates an NPV saving after some years in service for the new engine. After 25 years in operation, the saving is about 3.7 million USD for N3 with the with the SMCR speed of 16. r/min and propeller diameter of about 5.7 m. Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier 17
Summary Traditionally, super long stroke S-type engines, with relatively low engine speeds, have been applied as prime movers in bulk carriers. Following the efficiency optimisation trends in the market, the possibility of using even larger propellers has been thoroughly evaluated with a view to using engines with even lower speeds for propulsion of particularly bulk carriers and tankers. Handysize bulk carriers and tankers may be compatible with propellers with larger propeller diameters than the current designs, and thus high efficiencies following an adaptation of the aft hull design to accommodate the larger propeller, together with optimised hull lines and bulbous bow, considering operation in ballast conditions. The new ultra long stroke G4ME-B9.3 engine type meets this trend in the Handysize bulk carrier and tanker market. This paper indicates, depending on the propeller diameter used, an overall efficiency increase of 6-9% when using G4ME-B9.3, compared with existing main engine type S4ME-B9.3 applied so far. Compared with the existing S42MC7 often used in the past, the overall efficiency increase will be even higher when using G4ME-B9.3. The Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) will also be reduced when using G4ME-B9.3. In order to meet the stricter given reference figure in the future, the design of the ship itself and the design ship speed applied (reduced speed) has to be further evaluated by the shipyards to further reduce the EEDI. 18 Propulsion of 3, dwt Handysize Bulk Carrier
All data provided in this document is non-binding. This data serves informational purposes only and is especially not guaranteed in any way. Depending on the subsequent specific individual projects, the relevant data may be subject to changes and will be assessed and determined individually for each project. This will depend on the particular characteristics of each individual project, especially specific site and operational conditions. Copyright MAN Diesel & Turbo. 551-138-ppr Nov 212 Printed in Denmark MAN Diesel & Turbo Teglholmsgade 41 245 Copenhagen SV, Denmark Phone +45 33 85 11 Fax +45 33 85 1 3 info-cph@mandieselturbo.com www.mandieselturbo.com MAN Diesel & Turbo a member of the MAN Group