EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

TARDEC Technology Integration

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Battery Research & Development Need for Military Vehicle Application

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Quarterly Progress Report

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Portable Fluid Analyzer

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

SUSPENSION PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS OF WHEELED MILITARY VEHICLES

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

ANALYSIS OF NON-TACTICAL VEHICLE UTILIZATION AT FORT CARSON COLORADO

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Predator Program Office

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Methylene Chloride Alternative HAP-Free Chemical Paint Strippers at Anniston Army Depot

Crew integration & Automation Testbed and Robotic Follower Programs

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

Transcription:

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE Wesley G. Zanardelli, Ph.D. Advanced Propulsion Team Disclaimer: Reference herein to any specific commercial company, product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Department of the Army (DoA). The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the DoA, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. US Army TARDEC CPT John Kelly ARSC, DET 8 US ARMY RDECOM-TARDEC : Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release.

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 16 AUG 2012 2. REPORT TYPE Briefing 3. DATES COVERED 16-07-2012 to 15-08-2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE 6. AUTHOR(S) Wesley Zanardelli; John Kelly 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC,6501 East Eleven Mile Rd,Warren,Mi,48397-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC, 6501 East Eleven Mile Rd, Warren, Mi, 48397-5000 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER #23263 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) TARDEC 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) #23263 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES FOR GVSETS 2012 14. ABSTRACT Briefing Charts 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified ABSTRACT Public Release 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 30 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Presentation Overview Objectives Background Experimental Setup Characterization and Power Quality Test Procedures Experimental Results Modeling Simulation Results Modeling Parameter Variation Conclusions Future work

Objectives Component level compliance with MIL-PRF- GCSA(ARMY) Identification of parameters on power generation components Electrical machine characterization Modeling System level power quality compliance Optimization of high-voltage bus capacitance

Background

Background MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) 3.1.3 Electrical Characteristics Steady-state Voltage 565V 635V (V ± 35V) Ripple Amplitude 9V Distortion Factor 0.015 Normal Transients: 475V 725V for 15ms Distortion Spectrum Distortion Factor V 2 h h 1 V DC

Background MIL-STD-704F vs. MIL-PRF- GCSA(ARMY) Normal Transients MIL-STD-704F (270VDC) MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) (VDC) Specification MIL-STD-704F (270VDC) % of Nominal MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) (VDC) % of Nominal Steady-State Voltage 250V - 280V (270V +10V / -20V) 11.1% 565V - 635V (V ± 35V) 11.7% Normal Transients 200V - 330V for 20ms (up) / 10ms (down), 40ms settling time 48.1% 475V - 725V for 15ms, 40ms settling time Ripple Amplitude 6V 2.2% 9V 1.5% 41.7%

Background MIL-STD-704F vs. MIL-PRF- GCSA(ARMY) Distortion Spectrum MIL-STD-704F (270VDC) Distortion Factor: 0.015 Frequency Amplitude, dbv Amplitude, V % of Nominal 10-10 0.316 0.12% 1000 10 3.16 1.2% 5000 10 3.16 1.2% 50,000-10 0.316 0.12% 500,000-50 0.00316 0.0012% MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) (VDC) Distortion Factor: 0.015 Frequency Amplitude, dbμv Amplitude, V % of Nominal 10 115 0.562 0.09% 1000 135 5.62 0.9% 5000 135 5.62 0.9% 50,000 115 0.562 0.09% 500,000 75 0.00562 0.0009%

Background: Typical Vehicle Architecture Vehicle Loads Motor Drives & Voltage Converters Constant Power Capacitive (dc-link) Switching noise Resistive Loads Inductive Loads EMI filters Phase Margin Reduction

Background: Generator Control Theory Active Rectification Inverter required for Voltage Control Unity Power Factor is possible at terminals Generator Phasor Diagram Motor Phasor Diagram Vector Control

Experimental Setup

Electrical Diagram of Setup Generator, Inverter and Load Equivalent Circuit

Experimental Setup AC Dynamometer Constant Torque: 1244N m from 0-2,000rpm Constant Power: 260kW from 2,000-10,000rpm DC Power Supply 900V / 1000A / 250kW DC Load Bank 250kW in 5kW Steps Temperature and Flow Regulated PGW cooling loops

Characterization and Power Quality Test Procedures

TARDEC s Standardized Tests and Evaluations Traction Motor Servo Motor Generator Alternator DC/DC Converter Machine Characterization Winding Resistance Characterization Inductance Characterization Back EMF Measurement and Characterization Rotor Inertia Spinning Losses (Iron Loss, Friction, Windage) Spin Down Test Drive Performance Validation/Determination Maximum Electrical Speed Maximum Starting (Stall) Torque Torque Ripple Speed / Torque (Current) Envelope Continuous Efficiency Speed vs. Power Envelope (Continuous) Drive System Controllability Speed Regulation / Response Torque (Current) Response Voltage Regulation / Response System Robustness Fault Tolerance Reliability Evaluation Conducted EMI Evaluation Drive System Integration Practicability Safety Evaluation / Testing SWaP-C Evaluation Power Quality Compliance (MIL-PRF- GCSA(ARMY) / MIL-STD 704/1275) Current Harmonics Drive System Technology Readiness Level (TRL)

Power Quality Testing Scenarios 4.2.1 Voltage Regulation to Step Load. All power sources shall be bench tested with a simulated load profile (equivalent to the worst case operation of the system) to verify that electrical characteristics meet normal transient performance. 19 88kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm 88 19kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm 0 50kW resistive load bank step + 19kW constant power (2700μF),1800rpm 3.1.1.11 Distortion Spectrum. The distortion spectrum is defined as the maximum allowable limit of distortion expressed in decibels above 1 microvolt as a function of frequency. 3.1.1.12 Distortion Factor. The distortion factor is defined as the ratio of distortion to the steady state voltage. 19kW resistive load bank, 1800rpm 88kW resistive load bank, 1800rpm 50kW resistive load bank + 19kW constant power (2700μF), 1800rpm

Experimental Results

Vbus Experimental Results Voltage Transient Response Vbus 4.2.1 Voltage Regulation to Step Load 700 725V 700 725V 650 635V 650 X: 3.646 Y: 653.4 635V 550 X: 3.646 Y: 554.2 565V 550 565V 500 475V 500 475V 3.63 3.64 3.65 3.66 3.67 3.68 3.69 3.7 3.71 3.72 sec 3.63 3.64 3.65 3.66 3.67 3.68 3.69 3.7 3.71 3.72 sec 19 87kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm 87 19kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm

Experimental Results - Steady State db V db V db V Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm Distortion Spectrum, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 140 605 Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 620 605 Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 605 604 604 120 604 603 603 603 602 100 580 602 602 601 601 80 601 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 03 0.01 3.5 0.02 4 4.5 0.03 0.04 10 1 0.05 100.06 2 0.07 10 3 0.08 0.09 10 4 10 5 10 6 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 0 1800rpm 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Distortion 0.06 0.07 Spectrum, 0.08 87.8kW 0.09 Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm Load Bank, 1800rpm 605 Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 140 605 Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 620 605 604 604 604 120 603 603 603 602 100 602 580 602 601 601 601 80 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 02.5 0.01 3 0.02 3.5 0.03 0.04 10 1 0.05 0.06 10 2 0.07 10 3 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 10 4 10 5 10 6 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Distortion Supply, 50.1kW Spectrum, Load Bank, 18.7kW 1800rpm Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 605 Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 605 Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm 140 605 604 620 604 604 603 120 603 603 602 602 100 602 601 580 601 601 80 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.01 3.5 0.02 40.03 0.04 10 1 Time 0.05(s) 0.06 10 2 0.07 10 3 0.08 0.09 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 10 4 10 5 10 6 Time (s) Time Time (s) Frequency (Hz) Distortion Factor 0.0012 0.0015 0.0010

Torque (N m) Ke (V_line-line (pk) / rpm) Machine Characterization Ke vs. Temperature Voltage Constant K e = 0.253 V ll(pk) / rpm Negligible variation across speed (150rpm - 2700rpm) and temperature (30C, 46.7C, 63.3C, 80C) 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 Phase resistance R s = 10.7 mω 0.2 30 40 50 60 70 80 Inlet Coolant Temp. (deg. C) 80 No Load Torque vs. Speed 70 Friction (combined Coulomb (static) and viscous (dynamic)) 60 50 40 30 20 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Speed (rpm)

volt Electrical and Mechanical Response Estimation amp volts rpm 19 87kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm 148A 150 610 1900 595 44rpm 1800 580 100 580 570ms 1700 560 60ms 50 565 1 32A Vdc Idc 540 1.87 1.88 1.89 1.9 1.91 1.92 1.93 1.94 1.95 sec 0 550 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 sec Vdc Speed 1500 Voltage Transient: DV 48V and 60 msec Speed Transient: D 44rpm and 570 msec

Modeling

Modeling Effort Objectives: 1) Evaluate the required amount of bus capacitance need for bus stability 2) Assess the total vehicle electrical system s compliance to MIL-PRF- GCSA(ARMY) Procedure: 1) From test data develop a model of the generator/controller system 2) Compare simulation results with experimental results to validate the model 3) Adjust generator/controller model s dc-link and apply load transients 4) Incorporate the generator/controller model into a vehicle electrical system model

Modeling: Experimental Setup Models: Generator Controller Voltage Current Power Stage Inverter Dc-link Generator dq frame of reference Speed input Loads Switchable Resistance Constant Power Dynamometer Speed Command Torque response

Simulation Results and Modeling Parameter Variation

Vbus Vbus Modeling: Experimental Validation Comparison between Experimental and Simulation Results: Voltage Transient 70kW Resistive Step Load 70kW Resistive Step Load +Constant Power Load (Lab Power Supply) 595 590 585 595 590 585 580 575 570 580 575 570 565 560 70kW Step: Resistive Load Bank 70kW Step: Resistive Load Bank(Simulation) 565 560 70kW Step: Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank 70kW Step: Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank(Simulation) 3.84 3.85 3.86 3.87 3.88 3.89 3.9 sec 3.84 3.85 3.86 3.87 3.88 3.89 3.9 sec

Vbus Modeling: Evaluation of Generator/Controller Capacitance Vbus Comparison between 100% and 50% dc-link capacitance: Voltage Transient 70kW Resistive Step Load 70kW Resistive Step Load +Constant Power Load (Lab Power Supply) 590 590 580 580 570 570 560 560 550 70kW Step: Resistive Load Bank (Simulation) 550 70kW Step: Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank(Simulation) 540 70kW Step: 50% Reduced Capacitance, Resistive Load Bank(Simulation) 540 70kW Step: 50% Reduced Capacitance, Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank(Simulation) 3.84 3.845 3.85 3.855 3.86 3.865 3.87 3.875 3.88 sec 3.84 3.845 3.85 3.855 3.86 3.865 3.87 3.875 3.88 sec

Modeling: Simulating a Vehicle Load Cycle V,Amps rpm Simulation of a Vehicle s Electrical System Generator Startup Transition between Passive and Active Rectification Voltage and Speed Transients Generator Controller Current Limits 800 2000 1700 rpm V 1500 70kW Step Load 400 1000 rpm 1000 Speed Vdc Idc 200 Passive Rectification Active Rectification 148 A 500 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 sec

Conclusions and Future Work

Conclusions Compliance verification with MIL-PRF-GCSA(ARMY) Established the laboratory capability to validate the results M&S tools for power generation system analysis and optimization Characterization of a black-box power generation system, and model development Evaluation of system response with varying DC-link capacitance values and EMI filter parameters, controller gains, and driveline inertia

Future Work Combine component models with those of an engine and high-voltage bus architecture to assess power quality at the vehicle level FY13 power generation system SIL and vehicle integration Optimization of the bus capacitance for power generation systems Vehicle high-voltage bus capacitance allocation