CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Agenda

Similar documents
Electric Multiple Unit Procurement Update

Electric Multiple Unit Procurement Update

Caltrain Modernization EMU Procurement

CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Agenda

EMU Procurement Seats/Standees/Bikes/Bathroom

CalMod Program EMU Procurement Update. TJPA Board May 14, 2015

CalMod Program EMU Procurement Update

Staff Contact: Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, (650)

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Cost / Schedule Update

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Update Meeting

Caltrain Business Plan

Mobility Management: Caltrain

Caltrain Business Plan. Project Update July 2018 through January 2019

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

What is the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)?

February 2012 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

February 2011 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE PROJECT UPDATE

Table of Contents. Attachment 1 Caltrain Service History Attachment 2 Tables and Graphs Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts 1 of 12 Final

Key Findings. February 2009 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts

Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Caltrain Modernization & High Speed Train Projects City of Millbrae

5. Adjourn BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2019

APPENDIX E: BIBLIOGRAPHY

MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, P. Bendix, J. Berk, B. Jenkins, A. Levin, A. Sweet, C. Tucker, K. Gardiner

Caltrain / California HSR Blended Operations Analysis Supplemental Analysis Requested by Stakeholders. Service Plan / Operations Considerations Study

SAN FRANCISCO TO SAN JOSE PROJECT SECTION

Caltrain Business Plan

Ravenswood Avenue Railroad Crossing Project City Council Meeting Study Session April 4, Ravenswood Avenue Railroad Crossing Project

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

CONNECTING AND TRANSFORMING CALIFORNIA

East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. Downtown Oakland to San Leandro International Blvd to East 14 th St

Agenda. Open House Presentation Question and Answer Break Out Groups Report Out & Close

End-of-Year Performance Report FY Community Relations Committee December 5, 2018

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)

2019 New Transit Service Plan

Caltrain 2017 Annual Passenger Count Key Findings

Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Meeting. Agenda

High Speed Rail Conference

BART Silicon Valley. Berryessa Extension Project Community Update. October 27, 2010

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

State of California Transit and Intercity Passenger Rail Program. Caltrain Grant Application Overview January 2018

Caltrain Late Night Service White Paper

M E M O R A N D U M INTRODUCTION. POTENTIAL TDM STRATEGIES Marketing & Management. Residents & Employees. Exhibit 6

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Bicycle Advisory Committee CORRESPONDENCE. March 17, 2016

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

PENINSULA. POWERS BOARD 1250 San

VTA Board of Directors: We are forwarding you the following: Comments regarding 2016 Peninsula Corridor SEIR. Member of the Public. Thank you.

This Evening s Agenda. Open House 7:00 7:30 Presentation 7:30 8:00 Community Feedback8:00 9:00 Adjourn

San Francisco to San Jose Preliminary Alternatives Analysis

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

Late Starter. Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Draft Results and Recommendations

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Caltrain Downtown Extension Project (DTX)

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

SF-LA (125 mph) 2: : :32. SF-SJ (110 mph)

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

November Dear Stakeholders, Caltrain needs to be modernized.

Technical Advisory Committee

Muni Forward: Get On Board! Siemens S200 SF Light Rail Vehicle

LIGHT RAIL VEHICLE PROCUREMENT PHASE 2 Replacement Fleet Upgrades, February 2019

JPB CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos CA 94070

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Rail~Volution 2012 R. Gregg Albright

East Link Extension. September 16, Bel-Red Conclusion to Final Design Open House Public Involvement Summary

MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: VTA, Inter-Agency Partners, and Contracted Services: Ridership for February 2013

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

Modernization: How Caltrain Will Meet Growing Demand

Elected Officials Briefing North Metro Rail Line Update. November 10, 2016

Transportation Sustainability Program

Commuter Rail Update. October 25, 2018

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

This page intentionally left blank.

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Item No. 10 Town of Atherton

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Electric Vehicle Basics for Your Business

The Denton County Transportation Authority Thomas M. LeBeau Vice President Rail Development

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

BART s Transbay Core Capacity Project

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

METRO CNG Program Phase I Update. Customer Service Committee April 2014

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor. Transit Coalition Meeting June 26, 2012

Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Draft Results and Open House

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Transcription:

CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:00 PM 7:30 PM SamTrans Offices Bacciocco Auditorium 2 nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Ave., San Carlos Agenda 1. JPB Staff Report 2. Information/Discussion a. EMU Procurement (Attachment A) b. CBOSS PTC Program Update (Attachment B) 3. Public Comments 4. LMPG Member Comments/Requests 5. Next Meeting E Update: October 23, 2014 In person: November 20, 2014 at 6:00pm

Memorandum Date: September 25, 2014 To: CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) From: Marian Lee, CalMod Executive Officer Re: Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) Procurement Process At the August JPB meeting, CalMod staff provided an update on the Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) procurement process and shared information learned from the Request for Information (RFI) meetings, which were completed in June. The LPMG will receive a similar presentation, which is attached. The RFI is a critical step in the procurement process and provides up-to-date information about the EMU industry. With this information, staff can begin to more clearly understand the availability of off-the-shelf EMUs that can be best utilized for electrified Caltrain service. There are two phases of public outreach related to the design of the EMUs. The first phase, which kicked-off at the August Board meeting, involves soliciting input on key structural and capacity elements such as bathrooms, seats and standees, and bike capacity. Public feedback during the Phase I outreach will be coupled with technical analysis to inform staff recommendations to the Board for the EMU Request for Proposal, scheduled to be released in early 2015. The project website: www.caltrain.com/emu provides additional information about the Phase I outreach efforts, including the online survey: www.caltrain.com/emusurvey Phase two of the public outreach will occur after the car builder has been selected. Phase two will focus on interior design, configuration and aesthetics. Attachment A

Electric Multiple Unit Procurement Update Public Meetings September 2014 Caltrain Today 2 1

Key Facts Diesel commuter rail system SF to SJ area 77 mile corridor, 32 stations 92 trains / weekday Ridership: ~ 50,000+ weekday 3 Caltrain Ridership Note: Bike Ridership 11 % increase (FY14) 4 2

2014 Top Ridership Trains Note: February 2014 counts (lower ridership season) 5 Caltrain Modernization 6 3

Caltrain Modernization Program Early Investment Program Advanced Signal System: CBOSS PTC (2015) Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (2019) Caltrain/HSR Blended System 7 PCEP Project Description* 51+ miles Area Project Service San Francisco to San Jose (Tamien Station) Electrification: Overhead Contact System (OCS) Traction Power Facilities Electric Multiple Units (EMUs) Up to 79 mph Service Increase 6 trains / hour / direction More station stops / reduced travel time Restore Atherton & Broadway service Mixed-fleet service (interim period) Cont. tenant service *Proposed project not yet approved, pending environmental clearance 8 4

Key Regional Benefits 9 Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) Procurement 10 5

Status April 2014 JPB update on EMU procurement process May 2014 RFI issued Q & A to support stakeholder dialogue Inform RFP (early 2015) June 2014* Industry responses / meetings with car builders * First industry scan conducted 2008 11 Engagement 11 car builders contacted 4 have Off-the Shelf models 3 participated in June meetings Anticipate 2 4 car builders to propose on RFP 12 6

Meetings with Car Builders 13 Maximize Car Capacity Growing Demand - Ridership today: 50,000+ - Ridership future: 100,000+ Today - 20+ mile trips - 95%-125% peak weekday seat capacity Future - Share train slots with HSR (6 Caltrain / 4 HSR) - Caltrain needs to maximize car capacity / service frequency 14 7

Industry Confirmation Maximize Capacity Bi-level (verse single level) Off the Shelf Available Service proven Saves costs / time US Regulation Compliance Floor Threshold ADA Buy America FRA Waiver / Alternative Compliant Vehicles Criteria Will meet Caltrain Technical and Quality Standards 22 24 most common 15 Floor Threshold Current Status - No level boarding: impacts dwell time and on-time performance - 8 above-top-of-rail (ATOR) platforms - Passenger trains 1 st step at 18 ATOR - Use mini-highs and lifts - Supports freight and passenger cars 16 8

Moving Forward Dedicated Platforms - Capitol Corridor, ACE at 2 stations and Amtrak at 1 station - HSR dedicated platforms at 3 stations Different Caltrain EMUs and HSR trains - Customer needs / performance needs / cost - HSR floor threshold ~50 ATOR - Caltrain EMU floor threshold ~25 ATOR EMUs Compatible with Existing System - 8 platforms - Current diesel fleet (for interim mixed-service) - Future 25 level boarding 17 Challenges for Level Boarding Conflicting CPUC and ADA requirements - CPUC: distance between platform and trains - ADA: maximum 3 gap and 5/8 vertical difference between platform and trains - Need to get waiver from CPUC Potential impact to historic stations Construction challenges in operating system Transitional service Funding 18 9

Discussion Topics 19 Outreach 2 Phases Phase I (Inform RFP) Shell: Structural Size / Capacity Seats / Standees Bikes on Board Bathrooms Phase II (Inform Selected Builder) Interior: Aesthetic / Comfort Seat size / Spacing Internal Material External Color / Branding Bikes on Board Configurations Passenger Amenities 20 10

Seats / Standees Current EMU Considerations 620 680 seats per train Limited standing room on gallery cars One gallery car per train ADA accessible Lifts for bombardier cars Seat size / configuration flexibility Handholds / leaning benches for standees Full ADA accessibility Seat widths Space between seats Seat orientation Balance with other amenities Loading standard changes 21 Bikes on Board Current EMU Considerations 2 of 5 cars hold bikes 48 bikes per bombardier train 80 bikes per gallery train Bike riders and other passengers sit in bike cars Displaces 2 seats Concepts vary by car builder Car builders can design areas based on current bike capacity Balance seats and bikes on board Wayside facilities Need to comply with safety and ADA requirements 22 11

Bathrooms Current EMU Considerations 2 per gallery train 5 per bombardier train Annual maintenance costs Displaces 8+ seats Modular bathroom units available Compliant with ADA requirements Public bathrooms at 2 of 27 stations Average trip 20 to 28 miles Average trip 30 to 50 minutes Other systems: ACE 1 bathroom per car Capitol Corridor 1 2 bathrooms per car BART 0 bathrooms per car 23 Key Questions What are your riding habits? How often get seat, use luggage rack, bring bike onboard, etc. Is it important to increase, decrease or maintain the same capacity elements in the new train? Bathrooms onboard (0-5), seats etc. How would you prioritize the train capacity? Seats, standees, bike storage, bathrooms, luggage etc. 24 12

Online Survey: www.caltrain.com/emusurvey 25 Policy Decision Customers / Stakeholder Feedback - Meetings, station outreach - Survey* - Website, social media, project email and phone Technical Analysis - Off the shelf constraints and customer convenience opportunities Staff Recommendation - Balance feedback and analysis *Opt-in Survey 26 13

EMU Input Milestones Activity 2014 Spring 2014 Summer 2014 Fall 2014/15 Winter 2015 2016 Issue RFI Meetings with Builders Phase I Outreach Develop / Issue RFP Select Car Builder Phase II Outreach 27 Q & A website: www.caltrain.com/emu survey: www.caltrain.com/emusurvey comments or questions: caltrainemu@caltrain.com 28 14

Memorandum Date: September 25, 2014 To: CalMod Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG) From: Marian Lee, CalMod Executive Officer Re: Advanced Signal System (CBOSS PTC) Project Update The Advanced Signal System project, also called Communications Based Overlay Signal System (CBOSS) Positive Train Control (PTC), is being installed along the Caltrain corridor. Installation of the communications subsystem started on September 4, 2013 in San Jose and has continued north. Earlier this month, the CBOSS PTC team reached a key milestone by completing 100 percent of the installation work related to the Data Communications System (conduit and fiber optic cable) and wayside infrastructure between San Jose and the Dumbarton Spur in Redwood City. The next phase for this section of the corridor will involve testing the system to prepare for the FRA visit. North of the Dumbarton Spur, work has commenced on the DCS and wayside infrastructure installation in the cities of San Carlos, Belmont and San Mateo. In the coming weeks and months work will continue north. The on-board installation of CBOSS PTC equipment on the trains continues to be on schedule and 6 of the 8 pilot trains have the CBOSS PTC equipment installed. The CBOSS PTC field crew has over 200,000 hours of work with no incidents. Caltrain staff will continue to coordinate with city/county staff on construction and testing activities. There were no new complaints from residents since the August e- update. The attached presentation provides an overview the project s process. This will be the LPMG s fifth presentation on the Advanced Signal System project, the last presentation was in March 2014. Attachment B

Advanced Signal System (CBOSS PTC) Update LPMG Meeting September 25, 2014 1 Context 2 1

Caltrain Modernization Program Projects Advanced Signal System (2015) Corridor Electrification and Electric Multiple Units (2019) 3 Project Description Communications Based Overlay Signal System (CBOSS) Positive Train Control (PTC) Fiber Optic Network Project Requirements Includes federal mandate (PTC) Improves Caltrain performance Project Partners FRA, UP, CHSRA, JPB Needed for Blended System 4 2

CBOSS PTC Requirements PTC Prevent train to train collisions Prevent over speed derailments Prevent incursions into established work zones Prevent movement through a misaligned switch Interoperability CBOSS Enhanced crossing safety / performance Improved headways and operational flexibility Enforcement of scheduled station stops Schedule management Employee In Charge 5 Project Total Cost and Milestones Description Project Planning and Procurement Cost (in millions) Milestones $5 2010-2011 Phase 1 - Critical Design $25 2012 2013 Phase 2 - Final Design, Data Communications Subsystem & Fiber Backbone Installation $51 2013 2014 Phase 3 /4 - Installation, Testing, Commissioning $150 2014 2016 (Revenue service Oct. 2015) Total $231 6 3

Installation Work Update 7 Progression: South to North PHASE I (S. MP26) Segment 3 SJ Santa Clara (S of Lafayette St) Segment 2 Santa Clara (N of Lafayette St) Sunnyvale Mountain View Palo Alto Menlo Park Atherton Redwood City (S Dumbarton Spur) PHASE II (N. MP26) Segment 2 Redwood City (N Dumbarton Spur) SMC San Carlos Belmont San Mateo San Bruno SSF (S of Oyster Point) Segment 1 SSF (N of Oyster Point ) Brisbane SF Segment 1 (SSF SF) 8 Miles Segment 2 (Santa Clara - SSF) 36 Miles Mile Post 26 Segment 3 (San Jose - Santa Clara) 8 Miles 8 4

Milestones (Entire Corridor) DCS Installation* Wayside Installation* BCCF Office Installation CCF Office Installation On-Board Installation Segment 3 CBOSS PTC Dynamic, Pre- FRA & FRA Testing * Segments 2 & 1 CBOSS PTC Dynamic Testing* Revenue Service (Oct.2015) 2013 2014 2015 2016 * Public may notice activity 6 Month RAM Demonstration Testing 9 Installation Work Update DCS Installation Potholing, boring, conduit, fiber, base stations Segment 3 / 2 (S. MP26): 100% complete Currently working in San Carlos, Belmont, San Mateo Wayside Installation Modules installed at key system points Associated gate activity Segment 3 / 2 (S. MP26): 100% complete Currently working in a variety of locations with wayside equipment 10 5

Installation Work Continued BCCF and CCF Installation Modify space and install equipment BCCF fit out 100% complete, installing servers On-board Equipment Installation 6 of 8 pilot vehicle installations complete #7 in progress 11 Testing (Pilot) Segment 3 Dynamic Pre-FRA Testing Scheduled to begin January 2015 Ongoing verification / validation track database FRA Testing Expected first quarter 2015 12 6

Installation Pictures 1 Potholing Installing Conduit 13 Installation Pictures 2 Preparing to install fiber End of work ground verification test 14 7

Installation Pictures 3 Fiber Slicing Confirming no dust or dirt on the fiber 15 Installation Pictures 4 Onboard Equipment Simulator for training 16 8

Challenges Construction on an active railroad! 17 Outreach 18 9

Outreach To Date Activities CSCG (5 meetings) LPMG (4 meetings, next 9/25/14) One-on-one (each of the17 cities/3 counties) Community Groups, as requested (8 meetings) Communication tailored to location Direct mailers (28), flyers stations Website, social media, email, phone City/County Staff coordination 19 Complaints 12+ months First six months 5 people (noise, foliage disturbed, mud on street) questions about the project Next six months none questions about the project 20 10

Next Steps Activities Community Groups Meetings (as requested) Communication Direct mailer residents Website, social media, email, phone Separate installation and testing notices City/County Staff coordination 21 Questions 22 11