LADOT Enhancing Transit Services through Competitive Bidding

Similar documents
Blue Ribbon Committee

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

L. A. Metro s Parking Management Program Principles Applied. October 17, 2011 Rail-Volution, Washington D.C.

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

The RoadMAP to ELectric Vehicle Adoption. Model policies and programs to accelerate EV adoption at the state and local level.

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Paid Parking Pilot Program Parking Management

Branch Edmonton Transit

CNG Strategy/Overview

Metro Strategic Plan: Changing our relationship with the customer May 17, 2018

Transportation Demand Management Element

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Sustainability SFMTA Path to Platinum

Commuter Vanpool Program Scope of Work

NCTCOG MOD Workshop Toyota Motor North America (TMNA) and Denton County Transit Authority (DCTA)

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

APPROVE VANPOOL VEHICLE SUPPLIER BENCH CONTRACTS

Aren t You Really a Mobility Agency? Why The Vanpool Works for Transit

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

TRANSPORTATION TRANSFORMATION

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

Solano County Transit

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. August 2017

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

PSTA as a Mobility Manager

WARES. October, 2018

Shared Mobility Action Plan Overview July 2017

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Southern California - CHSRA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Testing Automated Collision Avoidance Systems for Transit Buses

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

Shared-Use Mobility: First & Last Mile Solution. Sarah Nemecek Project Manager

Car Sharing at a. with great results.

SouthWest Transit s Microtransit Service 2018 APTA State Public Transportation Partnerships Conference Wednesday, August 15 th

3.17 Energy Resources

Click to edit Master title style

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Testing Transit Bus Automated Collision Avoidance Warning Systems in Revenue Operations Active Safety Collision Warning Pilot in Washington State

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Presentation of the Baltimore Metro System

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Pathways to the Zero-Emission Bus CTA s 51 st Annual Fall Conference & Expo

Efficient Transportation Six Case Stories

Thinking Outside the Bus: New Approaches to Commuter Transportation

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

High Quality Service through Continuous Improvement st Quarter Performance Report

MOTION No. M Purchase of Five 40-foot Buses PROPOSED ACTION

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

May 23, 2011 APTA Bus & Paratransit Conference. Metro ExpressLanes

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Milwaukee County Transit System

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

Organization. SDOT Date and Commute Seattle. Dave Sowers, Deputy Program Administrator

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Connected Vehicle and Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) Mobility and Technology

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

Shared Mobility and Transit It is The Road to Economic

Sound Transit Fare Enforcement Program

Transcription:

LADOT Enhancing Transit Services through Competitive Bidding Corinne Ralph, Chief of Transit Programs City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation October 1, 2018

LADOT Vision Los Angeles will have a transportation system that gives people choices to support a high quality of life and strong healthy communities, as well as continued prosperity and resilience for the region.

Background Proposition A (1980) County-wide ½ cent sales tax Local return revenues initially used for special user group projects with social service agencies Transit became an increasingly larger part of the City department s goals

DASH 1984. LADOT began Fairfax Trolley service, first of what was to become the largest operation of community circulators in nation. 1985. SCRTD service is transferred to LADOT and renamed DASH, becoming LADOT s first downtown route.

1971. Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) inaugurates Minibus shuttle service in Downtown Central Business District Source: Metro Primary Resources

Growth of DASH Services 32 DASH routes currently in operation DASH Annual Ridership Year DASH Services* 1985 1 1990 7 1995 16 2000 21 2005 28 2010 25 2015 27 *DASH Downtown counted as one service, though it has consisted of 1-7 routes over time. Currently 5 routes. Passengers 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016

Two Distinct Services Two Different Ridership Groups A unique network of neighborhood circulator services that are also first mile/last mile connectors to the regional bus and rail system. Short rides in distance and time. Vast majority of riders are low income and minorities.

Commuter Express Mid 1980. LADOT took over SCRTD (successor to Metro) routes that were to be canceled, promptly expanding Commuter Express. Encino to Downtown was LADOT s first Commuter Express route

Growth of Commuter Express 14 Commuter Express routes currently in operation Year Commuter Express Routes 1987 9 1997 10 2000 16 2010 17 2012 14 Passengers 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Commuter Express Annual Ridership 0 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Cityride First of LADOT transit programs Early 1990s. Cityride created by consolidating former transit programs: Dial-a-ride Taxi voucher Cityride is now the largest non-federal or state mandated program of its kind in the nation.

LADOT has contracted service to private contractors since its inception as a transit agency.

LADOT Transit Background 371 vehicles in fleet 46 fixed route services DASH Commuter Express 21 M passengers/year Approximately $76 M annual operating budget Affordability Convenience Equity LADOT Transit Goals Safety Sustainability Stable Workforce

How It Works Request for Proposals (RFP) must be: Thorough Clearly articulate expectations and outcomes Include incentives and disincentives Encourage companies to propose innovation and new technology Minimize risk and uncertainty Contracts are typically 5 years: 3 years with 2 one-year options 5 years with no option years Contractor paid a rolled up rate per revenue service hour (fuel is a pass through, reimbursable cost)

Contractor Role Day-to-Day Operations Maintenance of City-owned Buses Leasing of Facility Administration

What Does LADOT & the City Control? Route Planning Fare Setting Safety Enhancements Workforce Retention Maintenance Oversight Customer Care Marketing & Outreach Minimum Wage

Performance Standards LADOT uses performance indicators to help measure and standardize service quality. Prior to 10 years ago, LADOT s focus was on performance penalties: Vehicle cleanliness Heating & air conditioning performance Passenger compliments & complaints Misuse of City vehicles Early/late/missed trips Safety On-Time Performance Customer Experience

Safety Safety is measured by tracking and penalizing for a number of performance indicators including: Preventable accidents per 100,000 miles Zero tolerance for safety-related bus defects High Injury Network

MOBILE Y E SHIELD + C O L L I S I O N A V O I D A N C E S Y S T E M OUR V I S I O N. Y O UR SAFET Y.

VIEW OF SMART SENSORS AND DRIVER DISPLAYS Forward Collision Warning Lane Departure Warning Headway Monitoring/ Following Time Speed Limit Indicator The Shield+ System for commercial vehicles includes three (3) display modules that alert the driver, visually and audibly, when the bus is in motion, and a pedestrian and/or cyclist is in one of the danger zones around the bus. DRIVER ALERT DISPLAY READOUTS FEATURE DESCRIPTION Center Display Only Lane Departure Warning Speed Limit Indicator Headway Monitoring/Following Forward Collision Warning Solid Green Solid Amber Blinking Red Alert Alerts when vehicle departs from driving lane without turn signals. Right/ left lane icon as appropriate. Active above 34 MPH. Alerts when the vehicle exceeds the posted speed limit. Notes the amount exceeding the posted limit. Active at any speed. Displays the amount of time in seconds, to the vehicle in front when that time becomes 2.5 seconds or less. Green vehicle icon signifies safe headway; red icon unsafe. Active above 19 MPH. Red vehicle icon warns of up to 2.7 seconds before an imminent rear-end collision. Active at any speed. Same red vehicle icon warns of a possible low speed collision, under 19 MPH. Solid green display indicates all the functions of the Shield+ System are operational. If the green center display is off, the pedestrian and cyclist detection is not operational. Solid amber display alerts the driver that a pedestrian or cyclist is detected around the truck, but is in a safe area. The driver may continue operating the truck with caution. Active under 31mph. Blinking red display and audible beeping alerts the driver of a pedestrian or cyclist that is in the bus collision trajectory. Driver should stop the truck immediately. Active under 31mph. 5

On-Time Performance On-time performance is an important aspect of service quality Performance measure Schedule adherence of at least 85%

Real Time Information System 23 AUGUST 1, 2016

Customer Experience Customer experience is a key indicator of service quality Performance measures: Complaints per 100,000 passengers Late or inadequate response to a customer complaint Completed revenue hours/missed trips Fleet availability Road calls

What s Next for LADOT Transit? Increase DASH ridership by implementing a system-wide restructuring of our Transit Services Reduce headways from 30 to 15 minutes on all routes Extend service hours to weeknights & weekends on all routes Restructure existing DASH routes to address changing demographics and densities Implement four new DASH routes (Boyle Heights West, Canoga Park, Pacoima, Sylmar) Pilot a microtransit demonstration on the westside of LA Transition the transit bus fleet to 100% zero emission vehicles by 2030