FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Similar documents
FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

MSU Weed Science Research Program. General Trial Information. Personnel. Pest Description

Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum Performance Tests

UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWIN FALLS COUNTY 2013 SILAGE CORN VARIETY TRIALS. Steven L. Hines 1 ABSTRACT

(11 BAS SB D9F Get the Most) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center. General Trial Information. Trial Location.

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg.

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

2003 Precision Planted Performance Trials

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Data 2-Year Average 3 Rank Yield 1 Wt Ht Lodg.

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

A3653 Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trials

Silage Test Results. Dry Matter Yield Company or Brand Name. lbs/ton DM lbs/acre. Grain Portion

2002 Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

No-Till Corn Burndown.

LSU AgCenter. Postemergence Command Combinations

2001 Wisconsin Corn Hybrid Performance Trial Results

LSU AgCenter. Early Postemergence Graminicide Combinations

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

Triticale and Rye Forage

Crop Description. Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 17/Jun/2003

MSU Weed Science Research Program

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

Southwest Virginia Blacksburg Blackstone Holland

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Corn Yield Trials 2012

All treatments injured soybean on at least one evaluation. POST1 Synchrony STS plus Flexstar plus Assure II caused 15% injury on July 11.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. OBJECTIVE TWO Measure the Contribution of Each Management Practice to Ratoon Crop Yield Using Cocodrie as the Test Variety.

H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 10 FT BORDER FRONT

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD (301) MARYLAND SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Rescue Treatments in Roundup Ready Soybeans

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Postemergence Weed Control in Green Pea

Southern Illinois University

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

North Georgia Region

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Southern Illinois University

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Tifton, Georgia: Evaluation of Sorghum Hybrids for Silage, 2016, Nonirrigated Company or Brand Name

Ontario Hybrid Corn Performance Trials

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Crop Stage at Each Application A B C Crop Name: ZEAMX ZEAMX ZEAMX Height (In.): 12-15(14) 21-27(24) Stage (L): V5-6(6)8L V8 11L

MSU Weed Science Research Program Comparison of bentazon formulations in dry edible beans

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

Ontario Hybrid Corn Performance Trials

CORN BRAND DEMONSTRATION REPORT Central Lakes College Agricultural and Energy Center *** LISTED AS PLANTED ***

Nov (16S-CORT-SOY-08) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 15 Purdue Weed Science. Xtend Soybean System Compared to Competitor.

North Georgia Region

Archive version: For the most recent information, see extension. missouri.edu.

Transcription:

92 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn and T.H. Diallo Arlington, WI Valent BioSciences FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Trial Experiment: 08 Valent Trial ID 3269 Year: 2009 County: Columbia Site Information Field: Soil Test: Date: 10/25/09 Previous Crop: Alfalfa Soil Type: Plano Silt Loam ph 6.2 OM (%) 2.9 P (ppm) 39 K (ppm) 110 Plot Management Tillage Operations: Fertilizer: Herbicide: Irrigation: Fall Chisel Plow Field Cultivator Soil Finisher Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/a: N/A Date: N/A Starter Analysis: 10-34-0 Rate lbs/a: 3.0 gal/a Date: 5 /2 /09 Post plant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/a: 50 Date: 6 /26/09 Dual II Mag 24 oz/a Hornet 4 oz/a Insecticide: Hybrid: See Factors Planting Date: 5/2/09 Planting Depth: 1.5" Row Width 30" Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre Planting Method: Kinze Plot Planter Harvest Date: 11/04/09 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP Notes: Manure: N/A Experimental Design Design: RCB Split-plot Replications: 6 Plot Size Seeded: 23' x 5' Experiment Size: 0.36 A Harvest Plot Size: 23' x 5' Harvest Plant Density: 31818 Factors/Treatments: Hybrid A). 129 B). 144 C). 147 Root Growth Promoter 0 gai/hkg 25 gai/hkg 50 gai/hkg 100 gai/hkg 50 gai/hkg soluble plants per acre Results: Table C-33.

Table C-33. Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Study. Arlington, WI - 2009. Grain Grain Test Plant Root Stalk Harvest V2 V2 V5 V10 Grower Silking Hybrid Treatment yield moisture weight lodging lodging lodging plants ears population vigor vigor vigor return date gai/hkg bu/a % lb/bu % % % plants/a ears/a plants/a 1-5 1-5 1-5 $/A doy 0 238 22.6 56 4 0 4 32091 32596 33080 4.1 4.0 4.0 830 207 25 229 22.7 56 5 0 5 31334 31797 32891 4.1 3.9 4.2 798 208 50 230 22.8 56 5 0 5 31818 32449 32681 4.1 3.9 4.1 803 208 100 227 22.5 56 7 0 7 31755 32133 32912 4.1 3.9 4.1 795 208 50 soluble 230 22.5 56 4 0 4 32091 32470 33059 4.1 4.1 4.1 804 208 129 228 23.3 54 10 0 10 32285 32462 33371 4.2 4.0 4.0 792 209 144 228 20.5 57 1 0 1 31603 32159 32891 4.1 4.0 4.2 806 206 147 237 24.0 58 4 0 4 31565 32247 32512 4.0 3.9 4.0 820 208 129 0 230 23.5 54 7 0 7 32765 33080 33838 4.3 4.2 3.8 798 209 129 25 232 23.3 54 11 1 11 32133 32260 33649 4.3 4.0 4.2 808 209 129 50 226 23.4 54 10 0 10 32070 32323 32954 4.2 4.0 4.0 787 209 129 100 223 23.5 54 13 0 13 32260 32449 33080 4.2 3.8 4.0 776 209 129 50 soluble 227 23.1 54 10 0 10 32197 32197 33333 4.2 4.2 4.0 791 209 144 0 234 20.5 57 2 0 2 31186 31628 32449 4.0 3.8 4.2 829 206 144 25 221 20.6 57 2 0 2 31376 31881 33396 4.0 4.0 4.3 782 206 144 50 227 20.5 57 1 0 1 31881 32638 32828 4.2 4.0 4.2 801 206 144 100 230 20.4 57 1 0 1 31376 31755 33017 4.0 4.0 4.3 813 206 144 50 soluble 227 20.4 56 1 0 1 32197 32891 32765 4.2 4.0 4.2 805 206 147 0 249 23.8 58 3 0 3 32323 33080 32954 4.0 4.0 4.0 864 208 147 25 232 24.2 58 3 0 3 30492 31250 31628 3.8 3.8 4.0 805 208 147 50 237 24.4 58 4 0 4 31502 32386 32260 4.0 3.8 4.0 820 209 147 100 229 23.6 57 6 0 6 31628 32197 32638 4.0 4.0 4.0 796 208 147 50 soluble 235 24.1 58 2 0 2 31881 32323 33080 4.0 4.0 4.0 816 209 Mean 231 22.6 56 5 0 5 31818 32289 32925 4.1 4.0 4.1 806 208 Probability(%) Hybrid (H) 33.9 0.1 0.0 0.2 18.7 0.3 23.1 78.3 8.9 26.7 67.0 11.2 37.8 0.0 Treatment (T) 10.6 15.2 61.4 13.2 10.0 13.1 33.4 29.9 85.1 95.8 91.5 69.9 10.6 36.7 H x T 53.6 13.2 38.4 62.4 46.5 65.7 56.7 36.1 34.2 80.7 90.6 98.3 51.4 75.0 LSD(0.10) Hybrid (H) NS 1.3 0.5 3.4 NS 3.5 NS NS 624 NS NS NS NS 1 Treatment (T) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS H x T NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 93

94 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn and T.H. Diallo Fond du Lac, WI Valent BioSciences FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Trial Experiment: 08 Valent Trial ID 3270 Year: 2009 County: Fond du Lac Site Information Field: Soil Test: Date: 10/25/09 Previous Crop: Soybean Soil Type: Virgil Silt Loam ph 6.9 OM (%) 3.4 P (ppm) 31 K (ppm) 73 Plot Management Tillage Operations: Fertilizer: Herbicide: Irrigation: Fall Chisel Plow Field Cultivator Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/a: N/A Date: N/A Starter Analysis: 10-34-0 Rate lbs/a: 3.0 gal/a Date: 5 /20/09 Post plant Analysis: 28-0-0 Rate lbs/a: 120 Date: 6 /25/09 Lumax 3.0 qt/a Insecticide: Hybrid: See Factors Planting Date: 5/20/09 Planting Depth: 1.5" Row Width 30" Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre Planting Method: Kinze Plot Planter Harvest Date: 11/11/09 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP Notes: Manure: N/A Experimental Design Design: RCB Split-plot Replications: 6 Plot Size Seeded: 23' x 5' Experiment Size: 0.36 A Harvest Plot Size: 23' x 5' Harvest Plant Density: 32452 Factors/Treatments: Hybrid A). 129 B). 144 C). 147 Root Growth Promoter 0 gai/hkg 25 gai/hkg 50 gai/hkg 100 gai/hkg 50 gai/hkg soluble plants per acre Results: Table C-34.

Table C-34. Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Study. Fond du Lac, WI - 2009. Grain Grain Test Plant Root Stalk Harvest V2 V2 V5 V10 Grower Hybrid Treatment yield moisture weight lodging lodging lodging plants ears population vigor vigor vigor return gai/hkg bu/a % lb/bu % % % plants/a ears/a plants/a 1-5 1-5 1-5 $/A 0 189 29.3 51 5 3 2 32538 32666 33733 4.1 4.1 4.0 639 25 188 29.6 51 5 2 3 32759 32800 32533 4.0 4.0 3.9 632 50 187 29.7 51 5 2 3 32040 32152 32681 4.1 4.1 4.0 630 100 185 29.9 51 5 1 4 32733 32829 32891 4.0 3.9 4.1 623 50 soluble 188 29.3 51 3 2 1 32191 32288 33080 4.1 4.1 4.2 635 129 167 33.0 49 8 5 3 32656 32826 33510 4.1 4.1 4.0 554 144 196 25.0 51 1 0 1 32070 32083 32941 4.0 4.0 4.1 676 147 199 30.6 53 5 1 4 32631 32732 32500 4.0 4.0 4.0 665 129 0 167 32.3 47 11 9 2 32184 32473 33964 4.0 4.0 4.0 555 129 25 169 32.9 49 7 4 3 33254 33292 33270 4.2 4.2 3.8 559 129 50 170 33.6 50 8 4 4 32244 32409 33396 4.2 4.2 4.0 561 129 100 159 34.0 48 7 2 4 33226 33419 33270 4.2 4.0 4.3 525 129 50 soluble 172 32.3 48 5 4 1 32370 32535 33649 4.0 4.0 4.0 571 144 0 199 24.9 51 0 0 0 32891 32891 33775 4.0 4.0 4.0 689 144 25 193 25.3 50 1 0 1 32323 32323 32449 3.8 3.8 4.0 666 144 50 197 24.5 50 1 0 1 31565 31565 33080 4.0 4.0 4.0 680 144 100 195 25.1 51 2 0 2 31755 31755 32638 3.8 3.8 4.0 674 144 50 soluble 195 25.4 51 1 0 1 31818 31881 32765 4.2 4.2 4.5 672 147 0 202 30.7 53 3 1 3 32538 32633 33459 4.2 4.2 4.0 675 147 25 201 30.5 53 6 1 5 32702 32784 31881 4.0 4.0 4.0 670 147 50 195 30.9 53 5 1 4 32310 32481 31565 4.0 4.0 4.0 650 147 100 201 30.6 53 6 1 5 33219 33315 32765 4.0 4.0 4.0 671 147 50 soluble 198 30.3 53 3 0 3 32386 32449 32828 4.0 4.0 4.0 662 Mean 188 29.6 51 4 2 3 32452 32547 32984 4.0 4.0 4.0 632 Probability(%) Hybrid (H) 36.5 0.0 1.5 7.6 27.3 1.8 17.1 10.7 3.1 22.9 35.0 25.1 27.8 Treatment (T) 84.7 17.5 86.8 58.6 20.5 3.1 36.3 44.7 0.7 93.0 61.8 2.3 79.4 H x T 70.4 2.3 53.8 47.5 22.2 80.9 60.8 69.7 54.8 32.7 33.4 0.2 68.9 LSD(0.10) Hybrid (H) NS 1.6 2 5 NS 2 NS NS 581 NS NS NS NS Treatment (T) NS NS NS NS NS 1 NS NS 559 NS NS 0.1 NS H x T NS 1.4 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.2 NS 95

96 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn and T.H. Diallo Janesville, WI Valent BioSciences FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Trial Experiment: 08 Valent Trial ID 3271 Year: 2009 County: Rock Site Information Field: Soil Test: Date: 10/25/09 Previous Crop: Soybean Soil Type: Plano Silt Loam ph 7.1 OM (%) 3.2 P (ppm) 53 K (ppm) 132 Plot Management Tillage Operations: Fertilizer: Herbicide: Irrigation: Fall Chisel Plow Field Cultivator Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/a: N/A Date: N/A Starter Analysis: 10-34-0 Rate lbs/a: 3.0 gal/a Date: 5 /6 /09 Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/a: 150 Date: 5 /10/09 Dual II Mag 28 oz/a Atrazine 4L 1.0 qt/a Insecticide: Hybrid: See Factors Planting Date: 5/6/09 Planting Depth: 1.5" Row Width 30" Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre Planting Method: Kinze Plot Planter Harvest Date: 10/28/09 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP Notes: Manure: N/A Experimental Design Design: RCB Split-plot Replications: 6 Plot Size Seeded: 23' x 5' Experiment Size: 0.36 A Harvest Plot Size: 23' x 5' Harvest Plant Density: 31009 Factors/Treatments: Hybrid A). 129 B). 144 C). 147 Root Growth Promoter 0 gai/hkg 25 gai/hkg 50 gai/hkg 100 gai/hkg 50 gai/hkg soluble plants per acre Results: Table C-35.

Table C-35. Valent BioSciences - Root Growth Promoter Study. Janesville, WI - 2009. Grain Grain Test Plant Root Stalk Harvest V2 V2 V5 V10 Grower Hybrid Treatment yield moisture weight lodging lodging lodging plants ears population vigor vigor vigor return gai/hkg bu/a % lb/bu % % % plants/a ears/a plants/a 1-5 1-5 1-5 $/A 0 260 28.1 55 4 3 1 32198 31313 32807 3.9 3.9 4.1 881 25 264 28.6 55 6 5 1 32156 32470 32533 4.0 4.1 4.1 893 50 259 28.5 55 5 4 1 29869 28893 31797 4.0 4.1 3.9 877 100 260 28.4 54 4 4 1 31643 31944 32617 4.0 4.1 3.9 881 50 soluble 252 28.3 54 2 2 1 29177 29419 31186 4.0 4.2 4.0 852 129 255 29.7 53 9 8 1 31173 31035 32727 4.0 4.1 4.0 857 144 271 24.9 55 1 0 1 31593 31111 32133 4.0 4.1 4.0 935 147 251 30.6 56 3 2 1 30260 30277 31704 4.0 4.0 3.9 839 129 0 261 29.5 53 8 7 1 32202 30934 33143 3.7 4.2 4.2 877 129 25 257 29.9 54 14 13 1 31123 32070 33143 4.0 4.0 4.2 862 129 50 260 29.5 53 9 7 2 31913 31818 33207 4.0 4.0 3.8 873 129 100 256 29.5 53 9 9 1 32207 32070 33080 4.2 4.2 4.0 860 129 50 soluble 243 29.8 53 4 3 2 28419 28282 31060 4.0 4.2 4.0 814 144 0 272 24.7 56 1 0 1 33270 31944 32702 4.2 4.0 4.3 940 144 25 281 24.8 55 0 0 0 33139 33270 32702 4.0 4.0 4.0 972 144 50 258 25.3 55 0 0 1 27262 24179 30303 3.8 4.2 3.8 889 144 100 271 24.8 54 1 0 1 32591 33838 32765 4.0 4.2 4.0 935 144 50 soluble 271 24.9 55 1 0 1 31702 32323 32197 4.0 4.2 4.0 937 147 0 247 30.2 56 3 2 1 31123 31060 32575 4.0 3.7 3.8 826 147 25 254 31.1 57 3 2 1 32207 32070 31755 4.0 4.2 4.0 846 147 50 260 30.7 56 5 5 0 30431 30681 31881 4.2 4.0 4.0 868 147 100 255 30.7 57 3 2 1 30131 29924 32007 3.8 4.0 3.8 850 147 50 soluble 241 30.2 56 2 1 1 27409 27651 30303 4.0 4.3 4.0 805 Mean 259 28.4 55 4 3 1 31009 30808 32188 4.0 4.1 4.0 877 Probability(%) Hybrid (H) 20.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 43.1 36.1 75.2 25.6 86.1 83.2 35.4 5.7 Treatment (T) 45.1 13.2 28.7 68.2 65.2 90.1 4.7 12.1 17.6 96.2 7.6 16.4 48.6 H x T 55.5 34.0 16.5 67.0 65.3 72.6 25.9 16.7 62.9 2.4 11.2 22.2 53.3 LSD(0.10) Hybrid (H) NS 0.9 1 3 4 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 66 Treatment (T) NS NS NS NS NS NS 1990 NS NS NS 0.2 NS NS H x T NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.3 NS NS NS 97