PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Similar documents
Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

Project NOVA

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

University Student Launch Initiative

Post Launch Assessment Review

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

Critical Design Review

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Post Launch Assessment Review

Flight Readiness Review

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

University Student Launch Initiative

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

Critical Design Review Report

NASA SL Critical Design Review

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

Presentation Outline. # Title

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

University of Notre Dame

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

The University of Toledo

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

The University of Toledo

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

Preliminary Design Review

Rocket Activity Advanced High- Power Paper Rockets

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

Critical Design Review

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Jordan High School Rocketry Team (JHSRT) A Roll Stabilized Video Platform

Michigan Aeronautical Science Association

USLI Critical Design Report

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

Team America Rocketry Challenge Launching Students into Aerospace Careers Miles Lifson, TARC Manger, AIA September 8, 2016

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

Dual Spacecraft System

Lockheed Martin. Team IDK Seung Soo Lee Ray Hernandez Chunyu PengHarshal Agarkar

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review

FACT SHEET SPACE SHUTTLE EXTERNAL TANK. Space Shuttle External Tank

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

Airframes Instructor Training Manual. Chapter 6 UNDERCARRIAGE

SAE Aero Design. Problem Definition and Project Plan

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

The 38M Aerostat: A New System for Surveillance

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

Rocketry, the student way

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Turbo-Rocket. A brand new class of hybrid rocket. Rene Nardi and Eduardo Mautone

Success of the H-IIB Launch Vehicle (Test Flight No. 1)

Stomp Rockets. Flight aboard the USS Hornet. From the USS Hornet Museum Education Department. Sue Renner and Alissa Doyle (rev.

By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,

LOW DENSITY SUPERSONIC DECELERATOR. Kolby Javinar Department of Electrical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI ABSTRACT

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

Madison West High School Green Team

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

To determine which number of fins will enable the Viking Model Rocket to reach the highest altitude with the largest thrust (or fastest speed.

Pre-Launch Procedures

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

Demonstrating Electric School Buses. Lessons from the Field

Students for the Exploration and Development of Space. San José State University Chapter Sponsor Information

Transcription:

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL 36849 POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW APRIL 29, 2016

Motor Specifications The team originally planned to use an Aerotech L-1520T motor and attempted four full scale launches with this motor. Unfortunately of these four launches, two launches were catostropic at take-off due to faulty motors. Aerotech has taken responsibility for both of these motor CATOs. After the second CATO, the team decided to switch to a Loki L-1482 for the final full scale launch. Payload Overview The team chose two payloads, a fairing payload and grid fins to serve as an aerodynamic analysis payload. PLF: Traditionally, a payload fairing (PLF) is used to protect a scientific payload during the launch process. However, for Project Aquila, the PLF was used house the drogue parachute and one of the main parachutes. Prior to deployment, the PLF acted as the aerodynamic nose cone. A lowdrag elliptical design was chosen do to the low-altitude, low speed nature of the competition. Grid Fins: The overall objective for the aerodynamic analysis payload is to obtain accurate aerodynamic data for an aerodynamic protuberance. The chosen protuberance was a lattice/grid fin. An in depth analysis of the grid fin was conducting using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a series of simulations and models designed to determine the grid fins interaction with the flow field. Using this data the team was able to complete the secondary objective for the aerodynamic payload. The gird fins served as air brakes for the rocket upon ascent to ensure the rocket would meet the 5,280 ft altitude mission requirement. An Arduino was used to command the servos that actuated the grid fins. The Arduino received input from a 10 DOF data acquisition system to determine when to deploy the grid fins.

Vehicle Dimensions The vehicle body was comprised of a 5 in inner diameter isogrid tube. The total length of the vehicle was 75.125 inches, including a 13.125 in fairing system, a 25 in upper section, and a 37 in booster section including the grid fins payload. Altitude Reached (Feet) Due to failures in full scale testing, the team was unable to launch in Huntsville and therefore no altitude was recorded. Vehicle Summary The vehicle utilized carbon fiber braiding for the body tubes that were formed into an isogrid type structure using a fiber glass skin. The vehicle weighed a total of 31.3 pounds. The relatively high weight is due to errors in simulating the rocket early on in the design process, additional weight was required to avoid surpassing an apogee of 5600 feet. Data Analysis & Results of Vehicle Due to failures, the team has no recorded data of the flights. No accurate analysis or results can be concluded from the flights. The team has experienced five test flight failures. The first failure was due to faulty simulations causing the vehicle to be underweight. The second was a motor failure which resulted in the total destruction of the vehicle. The third was due to the payload fairing deploying prematurely, which caused a recovery failure and total destruction of the vehicle. The fourth was a motor failure, which resulted in the total destruction of the vehicle. The fifth and final failure was an epoxy failure which caused a fin to detach at transonic speeds, this ultimately led to a ballistic approach to the ground and the total destruction of the vehicle. Payload Summary The payload fairing was designed to house both the drogue and main parachutes. The two halves were to be separated using a black powder charge, allowing the deployment of the

parachutes. The payload was constructed using ABS from a 3D printer and was reinforced with fiberglass. The grid fin payload was designed to cause drag by extending outward from the vehicle in order to reach the altitude goal. The fins were attached to individual servo motors and were printed from HIPS using a 3D printer. The goal was to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of the grid fins and how they could manipulate a vehicles flight. Data Analysis & Results of Payload Due to the series of failures in full scale flights, there are very few flight results for the payloads. On the fifth full scale launch the grid fins did actuate (confirmed visually from footage of the launch) but as the launch was catastrophic before apogee and the rocket was irreversibly damage upon impact, no data was collected. The payload was catastrophically damaged in all failed launches. Scientific Value The use of the isogrid structure as an airframe in rocketry was a novel approach to improving the strength to weight ratio of body structures. The structure was proven to be successful and will be implemented in future rockets as a strong, lightweight airframe. Additionally, the team was able to collect data on grid fins as drag surfaces and plans to continue to improve on this design for future applications. Visual Data Observed On the flights which the motor did not fail, the vehicle flew very stable and had every indication of being aerodynamically sound. The grid fin payload deployed visually, however the effect they had on the rocket is unknown at this point. Lessons Learned The Auburn team learned a lot about manufacturing and production due to the four full scale rocket rebuilds required due to failures. Unfortunately the rebuilds consumed a massive

amount of time and as a result, our documentation suffered. This was a building year for our team and we were successful in recruiting many new members, particularly underclassmen. This means a large portion of our team members will be returning next year and are inspired and dedicated to making next year a success. Summary of Overall Experience Despite the series of failure experienced by the Auburn team this year we were able to make great strides in our program development, successfully designing, building, and testing many new technologies that can be implemented in future builds. Perhaps our greatest innovation leap was the use of the carbon weave isogrid body tube, a material we look forward to using in future designs. We are incredibly proud of the Team Spirit Award we won at the competition in Huntsville and cannot wait to show off a successful Auburn rocket next year. Educational Engagement Summary The Auburn team completed a series of Educational Engagement events reaching over 2,000 middle and high school students. The biggest education event completed by the team this year was Rocket Week at Drake Middle School where the team successfully built and launched Alpha rockets with over 6007 th graders. Budget Summary While the team managed to keep the price of the rocket on the pad well under $7,500 at $4,014, the team s overall spending was hugely impacted by the four full scale rebuilds and motors.