LST TEST FACILITY. Vintage Reminder of Efforts Expended in World War II to Create a Viable Amphibious Ship Design

Similar documents
Everett E Henderson Jr R.G. LeTourneau Scorpion Drilling Rig

The Central Pacific: Tarawa (Gilbert Isles) and Kwajalein (Marshall Islands)

SSC Case Study V Container Ship Recurring Failure of Side Longitudinal Passing through a Web Frame

AIR TRANSPORTABILITY GUIDANCE TWO M151 1/4-TON TRUCKS AND ONE 1/4-TON TRAILER IN CH-47 HELICOPTER

CHAPTER 10 FLOATING WHARVES

Gaining Ground. Michael Fabey/AW&ST

icollective PROTECTION FOR COMMAND POST VEHICLES

AIR TRANSPORTABILITY GUIDANCE TWO M151 1/4-TON TRUCKS AND ONE 1/4-TON TRAILER IN CH-47 HELICOPTER

S-65 S-65. Oct (203) I I (203) Newsletter The Igor I. Sikorsky Historical Archives Inc. All rights reserved.

BUNKERS IN DENMARK. Photographed and edited by Updated

PM AAA NDIA Conference 25 October 2011

FROM BRAIN WAVE TO HEAVY LIFT TERMINAL IN ONE YEAR

Image 1. Wirbelwind based on Pz IV chassis.

British equipment losses at Dunkirk and the post Dunkirk situation

TRIER, GERMANY. The Capture of Trier (March 1, 1945) Trier, the oldest

Poulsen Hybrid Monorotor

United States Air Force Aircraft History Cards Microfilm

EDAR Expansion Information Kit

JULY/AUGUST. July/August Dakota Territory Air Museum s P-47 Update

Surviving M10 Gun Motor Carriage (M10 Tank Destroyers) Last update : 10 May 2017

Anderson. At Left: The Confederate Monument in downtown Anderson. Top Right: Lee Cross and Mike Tocci at the Grand Banquet.

Rural Water Supply Operations Seminar & Drill

Curtiss NC-4 Design, Construction, and Testing Reports

British Destroyers And Frigates: The Second World War And After By Norman Friedman READ ONLINE

On Active Service- WW2 Home and BEF The Daimler Fighting Vehicles Project Part Ba

National Transportation Safety Board Robert L. Swaim Aviation Engineering NRS. Fire Issues

The U.S. Navy is considering boosting the offensive and defensive capabilities of its next generation of warships, a major overhaul that

New Windsor, Maryland Rural Water Supply Drill. Tanker Shuttle Drill May 23, 2009 Summary Report

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Part C: World War I Trench Warfare

The Lexington Minute Men, Inc.

copy OFFICE REPORT OF THE PETROLEUM RAIL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL As Adoptl?d April 22, 1947

Extreme Spill Technology Canada _ China

Building A Replica Aircraft. Part Three Construction Details Wings and Covering

Petroleum Association of Japan

ARTICLE 23 OFF-STREET PARKING

Volume 16 Number 041. Giving Gas a Boost: The Catalytic Development of High Octane Gasoline

High School Seabee Discovery Game

Surviving M37 Howitzer Motor Carriers Last update : 25 February 2017

Opportunities to minimize stocks of nuclear-explosive materials *

Engtek Manoeuvra Systems Pte Ltd

OPERATOR, UNIT AND INTERMEDIATE (DIRECT AND GENERAL SUPPORT) MAINTENANCE MANUAL LANDING CRAFT, MECHANIZED STEEL, DED, OVERALL LENGTH 74 FEET,

American Bomber Aircraft Development In World War 2 By William Norton READ ONLINE

The all-aluminum Metal Shark 100 Defiant is based on the state-ofthe-art Damen Stan Patrol This

Bell 206B OH-58A Kiowa & JetRanger

U.S. Patrol Torpedo Boats In World War II, By John Lambert, T. Garth Connelly

British Motor Company

Improving Fuel Efficiency through the Supply Chain?

Railroad Retirement Board Field Training Machinists

!! Describe different construction types of ground ladders. !! Identify the parts of a ladder including markings and labels.

UNITED STATES MILITARY AIRCRAFT by Jos Heyman

ARDEC Rapid Design Projects for Field Support Part 1

Cargo Residues? 14 October Luk Wuyts

DRAFT CONVENTION CONFERENCE FOR THE REDUCTION AND LIMITATION OF ARMAMENTS NAVAL ARMAMENTS ANNEXES TO CHAPTER 2 -

Pump Station 7 Improvements

The 234/5 (?) Is this the missing link of German armored cars? Model by Tom Kondziolka Photos by Bill Tanguay & Tom Kondziolka

A SUPPLEMENT FOR BOLT ACTION CANADIANS. Second World War

More than 7,600 Canadian troops died fighting in the Netherlands. The last months of the Second World War, The Canadian military was given the

Engineering Fundamentals Final Project Engineering Lab Report

ARTICLE X OFF-STREET AUTOMOBILE PARKING AND LOADING AND UNLOADING SPACES

River Gunboat SAN PABLO

DID YOU KNOW THAT LITHIUM BATTERIES ARE DANGEROUS GOODS? RDIMS # March 2018

The Impact of Weight and Dimensional Change on the Transportability of Military Equipment. 3 April 2003

Jane is 125 years old this year

BEST IN CLASS: 440HP SECOND-GENERATION 6.7L POWER STROKE

Build Your Own Electric Car Or Truck

A prime example of a shoddy solar installation, and why you should never go for the cheapest quote! So, what s wrong with this installation?

National report of Japan (Submitted by Nobuyuki Shikama)

FRAMO. FRAMO High Capacity Oil Spill Recovery System a cost effective solution. By Jørgen Brandt Theodorsen, Engineer Oil recovery systems

Why waterjets? Why Marine Jet Power?

Project Phoenix. Update 7 November 5, 2015

Marine Jet Power, MJP, is a leading supplier of waterjet propulsion systems for high-performing applications. Customers with uncompromising demands

Sunset Magazine, Craig Rasmussen Collection

Dunkel Bros. and Trench Shoring Company

5 4 C O R V E T T E e n t h u s i a s t

The Matilda II Infantry Tank (A.12)

BELL HUEY II A daily workhorse with an expansive cabin providing multi-mission flexibility. TROOP TRANSPORT AND INSERTION

BELL HUEY II A daily workhorse with an expansive cabin providing multi-mission flexibility.

World War I Joseph Jackson Downs Douglas, Wesley Wright, and Samantha

Mars Surface Mobility Proposal

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

ROCKY TALK. Rocky Mountain Avanti Chapter NEWSLETTER. April, May, June 2018 Volume 11 Issue 2 FROM THE PRESIDENT

Apollo BP-1101/1101A

cutting down weight as much as possible and using available off-the-shelf light weight materials and RC equipment.

Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment. Airframes. Revision 1.00

Environmental Assessment of Cessna 208 Caravan Amphibian Aircraft

Future infantry squads shall be equipped with lighter, Safer, programmable but more lethal ammunition

IC Fee; spinal cord and brain injury fund Sec (a) This section applies after December 31, 2008.

MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. GASTECH 2017 ~ JAPAN 5 April 2017

~PICTORIAL========= Here's the Spanish Navy Barge. The Improved Ford car makes its appearance on the Mexican border near Fabens, Tex.

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

/72 PBM-5 Mariner USN

PRESENTER'S GUIDE "CRANE SAFETY" Part of the "SAFETY MEETING KIT" Series Quality Safety and Health Products, for Today...

THE OIL INDUSTRY. As early as 1750: American colonists knew about oil in various parts of the USA. Little known use for oil

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

Comprehensive Motor and Control Solutions for Surface, Subsurface and Land-based Applications. Engineering Defense Supremacy

US101 REPORTING FOR DUTY

Project Spartan. An Innovative Light Frigate Design for General Purpose Frigate (GPFF)

Baltimore & Ohio 1926 freight car fleet

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY SCHEDULE NO. 99 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES

Transcription:

LST TEST FACILITY Vintage Reminder of Efforts Expended in World War II to Create a Viable Amphibious Ship Design BACKGROUND Painful lessons were learned during the evacuation of over 300,000 troops from the beaches of Northern France in May of 1940. Shallow water and the lack of any port facilities in the village of Dunkirk forced the British to use hundreds of small watercraft to extract personnel. But their military equipment of any size had to be left behind. Any Allied attempt to invade Europe later in the war would require a large number of amphibious ships. Such vessels would need to be capable of carrying huge quantities of men and material, be seaworthy and be capable of running onto beaches or at least very close to shore in shallow waters. In August of 1941, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and American President Franklin D. Roosevelt agreed that the design and construction of such vessels should be accomplished in the United States. "Let there be built great ships which can cast upon a beach, in any weather, large numbers of the heaviest tanks." ~ Winston Churchill, 1940

DESIGNING A LANDING SHIP, TANK (LST) The task of designing such an amphibious ship was assigned to John Niedermair [right] of the US Navy's Bureau of Ships. His basic design, with some refinements, as described later in this article, was utilized during World War II to create over one thousand vessels that were officially designated as Landing Ship, Tanks (LST's). Each one of these ships was 328 feet long with a beam of 50 feet. An over-sized ballasting system enabled their tanks to be filled with sea water, resulting in a draft of 14 feet, making them suitable for selfsustained ocean transit. When approaching a beachhead, these tanks could be pumped dry, allowing a LST to reduce its draft to just three feet, nine inches. 'Clam shell' doors and a ramp were fitted to their bows. Machinery and crew spaces were mostly located aft, allowing for as many as 27, twenty-five ton tanks to be carried internally. Some of the first LST's were built at Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS). Their need was so great that the keel of an aircraft carrier was pulled out of Shipway #11 in late 1942 to allow for six LST's at a time to be built there. As ingenious and practical as this design was, it included two problems for the military. The Army's tanks had to be carefully backed up the ramp and into the vessel; not an easy task for a tank driver who only could face forward. Then there was the more serious issue of tank engine exhaust. Preliminary tests at the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground indicated that the amount of toxic exhaust generated by just one tank in a confined space was staggering. Twenty seven tanks' engines, all warming up at the same time inside an LST would be lethal. To help solve this problem, construction of a full-scale mock-up of a LST 'tank deck' was ordered by the War Department. Fort Knox, Kentucky, home of the US Army's Armored Force was selected as a suitable site to build such a facility. 2

BUILDING & EVALUATING THE LST TEST FACILITY Using blueprints developed for ship construction, the Post Engineers at Fort Knox started constructing what became informally known as the 'LST Building' in April of 1942. Two months later, the structure... depicted on the right during practice to back a tank into its interior...had been completed. What was also called the 'Fort Knox Ark' featured internal structural features similar to those to later be installed in real LST's. But these duplications were made entirely of wood. After a few tanks had been parked inside the LST Building, large flexible ducts were attached to each tank's engine exhaust in order to disperse their noxious fumes to the atmosphere, as shown on the left. On a signal from a control and monitoring station built immediately adjacent to the mock-up structure, tanks started up and moved forward, one by one. They passed in single file through the faux bow doors (shown in their closed position from the interior of the mock-up, right) and down a simulated ramp. Numerous problems were encountered with this procedure. The ventilation ductwork leaked badly and was easily damaged. Tank drivers were forced to wear gas masks while in the building, which greatly hindered their visibility for maneuvering in close quarters. 3

When the tanks moved forward, the ducting connected to their engine exhausts often did not disconnect as hoped, requiring the ducts to be repaired before reuse. In addition, after some of the tanks had exited the mock-up, dangling exhaust lines remained, interfering with the remaining tanks' movements. Bureau of Ships observers decided that a better design was needed. The ultimate fix was to install several huge fans in the overhead of the tank deck of all LST's. These fans discharged directly to the atmosphere, keeping the enclosed area reasonably clear of noxious fumes. After this concept was tried in the 'Fort Knox Ark' and found acceptable, all testing there ended in August of 1942. POST-WORLD WAR II USAGE After lying dormant for about three years, the all wooden structure was converted into classrooms. Windows and doors were cut into the sides of the structure. Heating and fire protection systems, and restrooms were installed. For three decades the US Army's Armor School used the building for educational purposes. Emptied out and abandoned again by 1980, the structure deteriorated badly until some years later the Army elected to use it for storage of antique armored vehicles until additional display space at the nearby General George Patton Museum could be provided. The Army's original plan, once that transpired, was to tear the venerable wooden structure down. Accordingly, for a number of more years, little was done to maintain the LST Building. 4

World War II veterans, including a number of US Army 'tankers' and US Navy LST sailors vehemently objected. The Army relented, and arranged for some maintenance work to be done. A patriotic local contractor doing other roofing work on the military base donated material and labor to install a new roof on the LST Test Facility a few years ago. What its interior currently looks like, still housing several old tanks destined someday for museum display, is shown on the right. In 1998, it was determined that the LST Building could possibly be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. That recognition has yet to take place, perhaps because of the structure's uniqueness. Since it was built to ship plans, it didn't neatly fit in the National Register's standard categories. But because it is a one-of-a-kind entity and of World War II significance, a small but determined cadre of preservationists hopes to not only get it listed...but restored as much as possible to its original configuration. That will require donations of a lot of money and volunteer labor...plus Army cooperation. In all likelihood, the LST Building will eventually be demolished, perhaps sooner rather than later, as have almost all of the hundreds of LST's whose amphibious missions benefited from the tests run in the 'Fort Knox Ark'. Such is often the fate of test facilities and mock-ups, once they have fulfilled their original purpose. While the LST Test Facility may not survive much longer, one of the vessels whose design was improved by the 1942 testing is likely to be around for a long time. LST 393, restored to its World War II configuration, serves as a floating museum in Michigan. Built by NNS in 1942, public access to her tank deck is provided via her permanently gaping clam shell doors and lowered ramp. Bill Lee October 2018 FOOTNOTE 5