PERSONS CHARGED WITH, AND PERSONS CONVICTED OF, AN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCE, BY JURISDICTION: CANADA, /16 November 15, 2017

Similar documents
PERSONS CHARGED WITH, AND PERSONS CONVICTED OF, AN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCE: CANADA, /16 November 15, 2017

An Overview of Warn Range Administrative Licence Suspension Programs in Canada 2010

DRUG-IMPAIRED DRIVING CHARGES: CANADA, August 10, 2015

SENTENCING FOR IMPAIRED DRIVING CAUSING DEATH: CANADA, 1994/ /16 November 15, 2017

British Columbia s Administrative Impaired Driving Regime. Reducing Impaired Driving and its Effects

Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics. Collected in cooperation with the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators

A SUMMARY OF GRADUATED LICENSING, SHORT-TERM AND 90-DAY LICENCE SUSPENSIONS, ALCOHOL INTERLOCKS, AND VEHICLE SANCTIONS ACROSS CANADA (July 4, 2013)

Phone: Toll-free in Canada: MADD (6233) Fax:

Department of Legislative Services

Driver Improvement and Control. Program

Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics

Cannabis and Drug Impaired Driving Just the Facts

INJURY PREVENTION POLICY ANALYSIS

STRID STRATEGY TO ADDRESS LOWER BAC DRINKING DRIVERS

Impaired Driving. Tough consequences Impaired Driver Assessments

The Potential Legal and Policy Implications of Lowering the Criminal Code BAC Limit in Canada

Break The Law, Pay The Price

Driver Improvement and Control. Program

Police Officers Perceptions and Attitudes About Impaired Driving Law Enforcement in Canada

THE MYTHS OF PHOTO RADAR EXPOSED

A Summary of Provincial and Territorial Traffic Legislation Related to Impaired Driving September 1, 2017

Impaired Driving. Tough consequences Impaired Driver Assessments

Collected in cooperation with the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators. Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision

Remedial and Ignition Interlock Programs Policies and Guidelines

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION FORM TURK ENTERPRISES LTD.

DOT HS April 2013

Rules of the Road for light industrial trailers in Canada

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Overview Data

Protecting Vulnerable Road Users

Learning Objectives. Become familiar with: Elements of DWI offenses Implied consent Chemical test evidence Case law

Evaluation of the Road Safety Impact of Ontario s Speed Limiter Legislation for Large Trucks

Establishing Effective Border Crossing Enforcement of Drinking and Driving Laws

SASKATCHEWAN SAFE DRIVING INITIATIVES

DWI Loteria Talking Points

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE

2016 Mothers Against Drunk Driving

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

Alcohol interlocks in Finland. 22 April 2015, Lisbon

19 May 2015, Luxembourg

Who qualifies How it works Questions & Answers. Ignition Interlock. Program

CCMTA Road Safety Report Series

Alberta s Current and Proposed Impaired Driving Laws

SLOW DOWN AND MOVE OVER

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session. FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised

Commencement of Preventative and Safety Performance Assessment

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed

Improvement and Control Program

Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data

Allstate Insurance Company of Canada

ITSMR Research Note. Recidivism in New York State: A Status Report ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION KEY FINDINGS RECIDIVISM RATES

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 53 CHAPTER

STUDIES ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IGNITION INTERLOCKS

Response to. Ministry of Justice Consultation Paper. Driving Offences and Penalties Relating to Causing Death or Serious Injury

Driver Improvement Program Policies and Guidelines

Home Model Legislation Public Safety and Elections

2011 Bill 26. Fourth Session, 27th Legislature, 60 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 26 TRAFFIC SAFETY AMENDMENT ACT, 2011

Research on Control and Prediction of Alcohol Impaired Driving with Ignition. Interlocks

A) New zero tolerance drug presence laws for young and novice drivers. Create a new regulation to define and permit the use of federally

Canadian Federal and Provincial Fiscal Tables

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

2000 DWI Law Recodification

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE

Drivers License Status Report for Milwaukee County

OWI countermeasure that saves lives and taxpayers money while allowing offenders to be part of society and provide for their family.

Administrative Component. 1. On what date did the new rules come into force? November 20, 2016.

Effects of all-offender alcohol ignition interlock laws on recidivism and alcohol-related crashes

Best Practices to Reducing Suspended and Revoked Drivers 2013 Region IV Conference Broomfield, CO

Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs

CCMTA Road Safety Report Series

Ontario s Large Truck Studies A s t r o n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u t u r e t o g e t h e r

Short-term Administrative Sanctions for Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers

Driving Under the Influence House Sub. for SB 6

STANDARD 14 SAFETY RATING

Supplementary advice to the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee

Tools of the Trade. Victoria Hauan, Impaired Driving Program Manager, Office of Traffic Safety

Commercial Driver s License Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR 2016 UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION OF DANGEROUS GOODS ACT

Young drivers. Drivers involved in fatal or injury crashes. Drivers involved in fatal/injury crashes per 100. per licence holders (lines)

Understanding drinking and driving reforms: a profile of Ontario statistics

Percentage of crashes with fatigue as a factor ( ) 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% Percentage

Collect and analyze data on motorcycle crashes, injuries, and fatalities;

Impaired Driving and Ignition Interlocks

Testimony for House Bill No. 2040

Entering Driver and Vehicle Information

Automated Vehicles AOP-02

Pinni Meedha Mojutho Ammanu Dengina Koduku Part 1 Kama Kathalu

Permit Type: Extended Drivers Hours of Service (Provincial)

ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2014: KNOWLEDGE OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES IN CANADA. The knowledge source for safe driving

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE

OECD TRANSPORT DIVISION RTR PROGRAMME ROAD SAFETY PERFORMANCE - TRENDS AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Public Service Bodies Rebate for Charities Resident in Two or More Provinces, at Least One of Which Is a Participating Province

IGNITION INTERLOCK PROGRAM

CHAUFFEUR PERMIT AND REGULATION BYLAW, 2016, NO. 3002

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES

Traffic Safety Facts

Strategies That Work to Reduce Alcohol-Impaired Driving

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,828 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JUSTIN D. STANLEY, Appellant.

I-95 Corridor-wide safety data analysis and identification of existing successful safety programs. Traffic Injury Research Foundation April 22, 2010

Transcription:

PERSONS CHARGED WITH, AND PERSONS CONVICTED OF, AN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCE, BY JURISDICTION: CANADA, 2012-2015/16 November 15, 2017 R. Solomon, Distinguished University Professor, C. Ellis, J.D. 2018 & C. Zheng, J.D. 2019 Faculty of Law, Western University

Introduction The following Chart provides information on federal impaired driving charges and related convictions. The statistics include both adults and youth, and cases involving motor vehicles, vessels and aircraft. However, the impaired driving charge and conviction data do not capture the role of impairment in other Criminal Code traffic offences. For example, there were more than 35,400 criminal incidents of failing to remain at the scene of a crash in 2016, 1 a significant percentage of which are generally believed to involve impaired drivers. Similarly, given the well-documented problems in processing impaired driving cases, 2 the police may charge an impaired driver with the criminal offence of dangerous driving. 3 Rather than laying any criminal charge, the police may suspend an impaired driver s licence and impound his or her vehicle pursuant to the provincial or territorial highway traffic legislation. 4 (a) The Canadian Charge and Conviction Data The charge data are reported by calendar year and are based on one Statistics Canada CANSIM Table. 5 The conviction data are reported by fiscal year and are based on two Statistics Canada CANSIM Tables. 6 There are three major problems with the conviction data. First, given the different reporting periods and the time lag between the laying of a charge and its disposition, the conviction data cannot be aligned with the charge data. While some accused may plead guilty on first appearance or be tried within several months, other cases can take years to resolve, particularly those involving serious charges. For example, assume that a person is charged with impaired driving causing death in November 2013 and is convicted in April 2016 following various Charter challenges, a preliminary hearing, a jury trial, sentencing, and appeals. The impaired driving causing death charge would be reported in the 2013 persons charged data in CANSIM Table 252-0051 7 and the conviction would likely be reported in the 2015/16 guilty 1 Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 252-0051: Incident-based crime statistics, by detailed violations annual (number unless otherwise noted) (Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2017) [Table 252-0051]. 2 R. Solomon & E. Chamberlain, The Road to Traffic Safety: Mandatory Breath Screening and Bill C-46 (2018) Canadian Criminal Law Review (in press); and R. Solomon & E. Chamberlain, Canada s New Drug-Impaired Driving Law: The Need to Consider Other Approaches (2014) 15(7) Traffic Injury Prevention 685. 3 Table 252-0051, supra note 1. In addition to the over 11,000 incidents of dangerous driving in 2016, there were more than 6,500 incidents of driving while prohibited or suspended for a federal impaired driving offence. 4 In a national survey of Canadian police, 30% of officers reported that they sometimes or frequently let impaired drivers off with an administrative licence suspension, rather than lay a criminal charge. Moreover, 29% of officers reported that they sometimes or frequently took no legal action against impaired drivers, but rather arranged for them to be taken home by a sober licensed passenger, taxi or other similar means. B. Jonah et al., Front-line police officers practices, perceptions and attitudes about the enforcement of impaired driving laws in Canada (1999) 31 Accident Analysis and Prevention 421 at 426. While the police survey is somewhat dated, the number of criminal charges has continued to fall as the number of provincial administrative licence suspensions has increased. See M. Asbridge, An Overview of Short-term Suspensions and Criminal Code Charges for Alcohol and Drug-Impaired Driving in Canada: 2010-14 (Oakville, Ont.: Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) Canada, 2016) at 8. 5 Table 252-0051, supra note 1. 6 Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 252-0053, Adult criminal courts, number of cases and charges by type of decision annual (number) (Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2016) [Table 252-0053]; and Statistics Canada, Table 252-0064, Youth courts, number of cases and charges by type of decision (Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2016). 7 Table 252-0051, supra note 1. 2

dispositions data in CANSIM Table 252-0053. 8 Second, the conviction data, when first reported, may significantly understate the total convictions in that fiscal year. For example, it was first reported that there were 26,296 impaired driving convictions in the 2014/15 fiscal year. However, this was subsequently revised to 32,025, presumably due to the failure of the courts to report all of the 2014/15 convictions in a timely manner. Consequently, care must be taken in interpreting the decrease in convictions from 2014/15 to 2015/16, reported in the following Chart. This decline is likely due, in large part, to the fact that the 2015/16 convictions have not yet been revised upwards to reflect the late reporting of the remaining 2015/16 convictions. Third, the conviction data typically contain numerous endnotes that qualify the data or alert the reader to omissions or other problems. CANSIM Table 252-0053 contains 48 endnotes, most of which are relevant to impaired driving. Some of the relevant endnotes are not particularly consequential, while others address major deficiencies in the data. For example, the endnotes indicate that: the Manitoba provincial courts did not report from 1994/95 to 2004/05; the British Columbia provincial and superior courts only began reporting in 2000/01; and the Prince Edward Island, Québec, Ontario, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan superior courts do not provide any case and disposition data. 9 Given this patchwork of reporting, it is difficult to determine the extent to which impaired driving convictions are understated. The superior courts failure to report is particularly concerning because they tend to hear the most serious impaired driving cases. (b) Canada s Charge and Conviction Rates in Perspective It is important to provide a broader context for Canada s impaired driving charge and conviction data. Although per capita rates of alcohol consumption and patterns of impaired driving are similar in Canada and the United States, 10 Canada s 2015 charge rate for impaired driving offences per 100,000 licensed drivers 11 was about 40% of the American rate. 12 Moreover, in recent years, roughly 60% of those charged with an impaired driving offence in Canada were convicted, whereas the American conviction rate is approximately 80%. 13 8 Table 252-0053, supra note 6. 9 Ibid. There are numerous other gaps in the conviction data. For example, information on municipal court cases are, for unexplained reasons, excluded from the information that Québec transmits to Statistics Canada. 10 See Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), OECD.Stat, Health Status, Non-Medical Determinants of Health: Alcohol Consumption, online: OECD <http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=heal TH_STAT>; and E. Sauber-Schatz et al., Vital Signs: Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention United States and 19 Comparison Countries (2016) 65 (26) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 672, at 674-75. 11 For the number of persons charged (50,931) and number of licensed drivers (25,273,000) in Canada, see respectively: Table 252-0051, supra note 1; and Transport Canada, Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics: 2015 (Ottawa: Transport Canada, 2017) at 8. 12 For the number of persons charged (1,089,171) and number of licensed drivers (218,084,465) in the United States, see respectively: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Crime in the United States 2015, online: FBI <https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/tables/table-29>; and US Department of Transportation, Office of Highway Policy Information, Highway Statistics 2015 (Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, 2017) at DL-1C. 13 J. Ringel et al., Project Report and User Guide (Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2015) at Chapter Three, Court Data, Estimates and Analysis, online: CDC <https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/calcu lator/doc/3.html>. While acknowledging that the data was limited and dated, the authors assumed that 88% of those arrested for an impaired driving offence were convicted. According to a leading American traffic safety researcher, the current conviction rate in the United States is approximately 80%. Phone communication with J. Fell, Senior Research Scientist, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD, on August 4, 2017. We have used the more recent estimate provided by J. Fell. 3

Based on the currently available charge and conviction data, only 1 in 880 licensed drivers are convicted of an impaired driving offence in Canada each year, compared to 1 in 250 licensed drivers in the United States. Canada s relatively low charge and conviction rates help explain the limited deterrent impact of the current federal impaired driving legislation. 4

PERSONS CHARGED WITH, AND PERSONS CONVICTED OF, AN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCE, BY JURISDICTION: CANADA, 2012-2015/16 Prov./ Terr. Persons Charged 2012 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons Convicted Charged Convicted Charged Convicted Charged Convicted Charged 2012/13 2013 2013/14 2014 2014/15 2015 2015/16 2016 Persons Convicted 2016/17 AB 10,313 6,168 9,273 6,240 9,089 5,117 8,521 4,627 7,522 N/A BC 5,846 2,720 3,681 1,373 3,500 835 3,399 862 3,303 N/A MB 2,454 1,328 2,394 1,669 2,200 1,540 2,140 1,406 2,096 N/A NB 1,436 960 1,364 937 1,285 890 1,252 834 1,282 N/A NL 956 590 869 558 801 486 735 422 773 N/A NT 216 132 247 157 280 170 292 141 310 N/A NS 1,827 1,309 1,768 1,256 1,836 1,246 1,779 1,269 1,687 N/A NU 109 61 98 67 109 74 103 65 91 N/A ON 16,066 11,039 14,622 10,146 14,171 9,398 14,242 9,283 13,915 N/A PE 352 268 333 239 279 223 289 215 301 N/A QC 15,531 7,415 14,403 10,414 13,539 9,125 13,604 6,665 13,717 N/A SK 5,005 2,899 4,897 2,888 4,514 2,806 4,351 2,763 3,768 N/A YK 150 105 158 101 181 115 224 143 201 N/A CAN 60,261 34,994 54,107 36,045 51,784 32,025 50,931 28,695* 48,966 N/A * The conviction total for 2015/16 will inevitably be revised upwards to reflect the late reporting of the remaining 2015/16 convictions. 5