Draft US Corridor Study Traffic Analysis Report

Similar documents
V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Traffic Engineering Study

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Traffic Feasibility Study

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Letter of Transmittal

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Analysis. Yelm East Gateway Planned Action

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

2016 Traffic Signal System Performance Metrics Update Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Engineering, Public Works John Richardson, Planning and Sustainability

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE RESORT CENTRE ASP

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

Creditview Road Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Traffic Operations Analysis Final Report

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Mineola Village Green

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

City of Pacific Grove

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

Final Traffic Technical Memorandum

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

Major Widening/New Roadway

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

Summary of the Alcoa Highway Redevelopment Project

MANHATTAN VILLAGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS MANASSAS PARK STATION PARKING EXPANSION. Site Evaluation & Recommendation. October 18, 2016

Triangle Mobility Action Partnership (Tri-MAP) Friday, July 18, 2014 RDU Airport Authority

West Rosslyn Development

LCPS Valley Service Center

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2

Transcription:

Draft US 15-501 Corridor Study Traffic Analysis Report US 15-501 from NC 54 to US 64 Year 2013-2040 Prepared for: North Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 August 8, 2014

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA... 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF PROJECT... 2 1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS... 3 2. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS... 7 2.1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS... 7 2.2 EXISITNG ANALYSIS (2013)... 8 3. FUTURE STANDARD INTERSECTION ANALYSIS... 11 3.1 FUTURE STANDARD ANALYSIS... 11 3.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS... 11 4. FUTURE SUPERSTREET ANALYSIS... 14 4.1 FUTURE SUPERSTREET ANALYSIS... 14 4.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS... 14 5. GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 16 6. CONCLUSION... 18 7. APPENDIX... 19 7.1 APPENDIX A... 19 i

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 1. Introduction 1.1 STUDY AREA The US 15-501 corridor is functionally classified as a north-south principal arterial which serves the inter-county travel demands between Chatham and Orange Counties. US 15-501 is considered a Strategic Corridor between the growing towns of Pittsboro and Chapel Hill and is classified as a Boulevard in the NCDOT Strategic Highway Corridors Vision Plan (July 2008). The corridor has recently seen an increase in retail and residential development serving individuals working in nearby commercial, high-tech, medical, and research centers. US 15-501 serves many different land uses such as: residential, retail, and office. The fifteen mile study area on US 15-501 begins with the NC 54 interchange in Orange County and continues to the US 64 interchange in Chatham County as illustrated in Figure 1. There are 25 intersections in the project study area; 15 are signalized and 10 are unsignalized. 1

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Figure 1 Project Location 1.2 PURPOSE OF PROJECT As development interest in the US 15-501 corridor from NC 54 to US 64 grows, so does the need to preserve the current operations along the roadway. NCDOT contracted with Stantec to study the existing (2013) and future year (2040) operations, to determine if current infrastructure 2

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT could support the future growth. Additionally, NCDOT wanted to evaluate the implementation of superstreets along US 15-501. In a collaborative effort, staff from NCDOT Divisions 7 &8 and NCDOT Congestion Management worked with staff from Chatham and Orange counties, and the Towns of Chapel Hill and Pittsboro to create a clear picture of the existing conditions along the corridor and a vision of what was on the horizon for this area. NCDOT also sought to provide guiding principles for the US 15-501 corridor for the future that may be adopted by local councils and governments. 1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS There were five scenarios for this study. The first scenario, Existing Scenario 1, evaluated the AM and PM peak hours for existing volumes. Counts taken in April 2013 were used for volumes. The remaining four scenarios studied the future year of 2040. The first three, Future Scenarios 1A 1C analyzed standard intersections along US 15-501. Future Scenario 2 analyzed superstreets along the US 15-501 corridor. These five scenarios are described in further detail below: Existing Scenario 1-2013 Existing Conditions The laneage used in the existing scenario was taken from 2013 field visits and 2013 Google aerials. Current signal plans and timing, provided by the Town of Chapel Hill and NCDOT, were used for this analysis. Future Scenario 1A - 2040 With Improved Traditional Intersections This scenario evaluates the corridor with the existing 2013 geometry at the NC 54 interchange. The study intersections along US 15-501 were analyzed as standard intersections with some geometric improvements, such as turn lanes, and the signals were optimized. Future Scenario 1B - 2040 With Improved Traditional Intersections and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange Interchange improvements were recommended for the US 15-501 / NC 54 interchange as part of the Obey s Creek TIA performed by HNTB. This study recommends that the NC 54 westbound ramp be reconfigured to add a loop ramp to the western side of the interchange. At the time of this report, this improvement was not funded. An illustration 3

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT of these improvements is displayed in Figure 2.. The laneage in the remainder of the corridor matches Future Scenario 1A. Future Scenario 1C - 2040 With Improved Traditional Intersections, Widening along Northern Section of US 15-501, and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange This scenario uses the same NC 54 interchange modifications as the previous scenario, Future Scenario 1B. Additionally, this scenario evaluates widening US 15-501 to six lanes from the NC 54 interchange to the Mann s Chapel Rd/ Plaza Rd intersection. The laneage in the remainder of the corridor matches Future Scenario 1A. Future Scenario 2-2040 with Superstreets and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange This scenario evaluates the use of superstreets along the corridor. Superstreet configurations limit movements and signal phases at the intersection. In this study, what can be referred to as standard superstreet configurations, were used. The standard superstreets used in this study remove the left turn and through movements from the side streets. U-turn locations are positioned downstream and upstream from the main intersection, and can be signalized or unsignalized. Left turns off of US 15-501 onto the side streets are permitted. All signals run with two phase signal timing plans. An illustration of an example superstreet intersection is shown in Figure 3. Some of the intersections in the vicinity of the Polks Landing Development utilize different types of superstreet intersections, but they still utilize the concept of minimizing traffic movements and reducing the number of signal phases. Laneage and volume figures for all scenarios are included in Appendix A 4

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Figure 2- Concept of NC 54 Improvements recommended by HNTB in the Obey s Creek TIA 5

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Figure 3- Concept of Standard Superstreet Intersection 6

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 2. Traffic Analysis 2.1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Capacity analyses were performed for the roadway network in the project study area. The traffic analysis program Synchro Version 7 was used to analyze all intersections according to methods put forth by the Transportation Research Board s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The Highway Capacity Manual defines capacity as the maximum rate of flow at which persons or vehicles can be reasonably expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a specified time period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions, usually expressed as vehicles per lane per hour. Level-of-service (LOS) is a term used to describe different traffic conditions and is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists/ or passengers. LOS varies from Level A, representing free flow, to Level F where traffic breakdown conditions are evident. Traffic conditions with LOS of E or F are deemed unacceptable and represent significant travel delay, increased accident potential, and inefficient motor vehicle operation. At an unsignalized intersection, the primary traffic on the main roadway is virtually uninterrupted. Therefore, the overall delay for the intersection is usually less than what is calculated for the minor street movements. The overall intersection delay and the delay for the intersection s minor street(s) are reported in the summary tables of this report. Generally, LOS D is acceptable for signalized intersections in suburban areas during peak periods. With the current method of reporting LOS for unsignalized intersections, it is not uncommon for some of the minor street movements to be operating at a LOS F during peak hour conditions. 7

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Tables 1 and 2 present the criteria of each LOS as indicated in the Highway Capacity Manual. Table 1: Level-of-Service Criteria - Signalized Intersections Level-of-Service Criteria Signalized Intersections Level-of-Service Stopped Delay per Vehicle (sec) A 10.0 B >10.0 and 20.0 C >20.0 and 35.0 D >35.0 and 55.0 E >55.0 and 80.0 F >80.0 Table 2: Level-of-Service Criteria - Unsignalized Intersections Level-of-Service Criteria Unsignalized Intersections Level-of-Service Stopped Delay per Vehicle (sec) A 10.0 B >10.0 and 15 C >15 and 25 D >25 and 35 E >35 and 50 F >50 2.2 EXISITNG ANALYSIS (2013) The 15 mile section of US 15-501 between NC 54 and US 64 is currently a four-lane divided roadway. Many access management principles are currently being implemented along this roadway: There is a 8

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT median throughout, driveway connections are limited, full movement access intersections are limited. Also, u-turns are located at intersections along the corridor to accommodate turning vehicles, and there is currently good spacing between signalized intersections. For the existing conditions analysis, turning movement counts at the 25 study area intersections were taken on April 23 rd and 24 th, 2013 for the AM (7-9) and PM (4-6) peak hours. The existing volumes and laneage figures are illustrated in Appendix A. The existing analysis shows that intersections along the US 15-501 corridor are operating at overall acceptable levels of service. The only exception is at the Mount Carmel Church Road / Culbreth Road intersection at US 15-501 which is operating at LOS F during the PM peak hour. Side street operations at some of the intersections are operating at unacceptable levels of service; however, the overall intersection operates at an acceptable level of service. This demonstrates how good access management can maintain an acceptable level of service along a high volume corridor. Proposed median breaks and additional new signals should be limited along this corridor in the future. Additionally, existing signals should be evaluated for phase reduction where possible as additional parcels develop. Many of the approved TIA s in this area demonstrate good access management as a part of their proposed site plans which should aid to further preserve levels of service along the US 15-501 corridor. An example of this is shown in Appendix A The existing levels of service for the study intersections are shown in Table 3. 9

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 10

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 3. Future Standard Intersection Analysis 3.1 FUTURE STANDARD ANALYSIS The traffic volumes for 2040 were taken from the US 15-501 Corridor Study Traffic Forecast completed by Stantec on March 4, 2014 in concordance with this project. The AM and PM peakhour turning movement volumes for the studied access drives and intersections were then analyzed in Synchro for the Build Out year. The 2040 traffic volume figures are included in Appendix A. Additional geometric improvements in future scenarios were recommended in order to maintain acceptable LOS along the corridor. Improvements included turn lanes and signals; while the overall four-lane divided cross-section was maintained. Volume and laneage figures for each scenario are shown in Appendix A. 3.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Future Scenario 1A - 2040 with Improved Traditional Intersections This scenario evaluates the corridor with the existing 2013 geometry at the US 15-501 / NC 54 interchange. In 2040, with standard intersections along US 15-501, the intersections surrounding the NC 54 interchange are not expected to perform at acceptable level of service. The study intersections along US 15-501 were analyzed as standard intersections with some geometric improvements, such as turn lanes, and the signals were optimized. The intersections along the corridor, south of the NC 54 interchange are predicted to operate at an overall acceptable level of service but will have failing movements and significant queuing on the side streets. Future Scenario 1B - 2040 with Improved Traditional Intersections and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange Interchange improvements were recommended for the US 15-501 / NC 54 interchange as part of the Obey s Creek TIA performed by HNTB. This study recommends that the NC 54 westbound ramp be reconfigured to add a loop ramp to the western side of the interchange. At the time of this report, this improvement was not funded. According to the Synchro analysis, this improvement is predicted to significantly improve operations at the interchange. Additional 11

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT turning lanes were added to the Mount Carmel Church Road / Culbreth Road intersection, which improved operations at this intersection as well. Future Scenario 1C - 2040 with Improved Traditional Intersections, Widening along Northern Section of US 15-501, and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange Widening US 15-501 to six lanes from the NC 54 interchange to the Mann s Chapel Rd/ Plaza Rd intersection brings the overall LOS for all study intersections to acceptable levels. However, there are unacceptable delays predicted for several side street movements. Table 4, shown on the next page, displays the LOS and delay in seconds for the standard intersection scenarios. 12

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Table 4-2040 Standard Intersection Conditions Level-of-Service Summary Overall LOS (Delay in Seconds) Intersection Future Scenario 1A - 2040 with Improved Traditional Intersections Future Scenario 1B - 2040 with Improved Traditional Intersections and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange Future Scenario 1C 2040 with Improved Traditional Intersections, Widening along Northern Section of US 15-501, and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange AM PM AM PM AM PM US 15-501 at NC 54 WB Ramps E (66.0)* F (160.2)* A (7.5) E (67.7)* A (7.9) B (15.6) US 15-501 at NC 54 EB Ramps D (54.9)* F (106.5)* D (35.6)* E (61.9)* D (33.7)* B (19.5) US 15-501 at Mt. Carmel Church Rd. / Culbreth Rd. US 15-501 at Bennett Rd. / Arlen Park Dr. F (214.2)* E (61.3)* F (53.4)* D (50.8)* D (45.3)* D (36.5)* D (25.2)* C (21.0)* C (23.4)* C (17.6)* US 15-501 at Market St. E (59.2)* D (50.7)* D (37.8)* D (45.4)* US 15-501 at Dogwood Acres Dr. A (5.4)* A (4.4)* A (5.0)* A (4.1)* US 15-501 at Smith Level Rd. D (44.1)* D (44.1)* D (39.5) D (41.5) US 15-501 at Old Lystra Rd. B (11.6)* D (53.9)* A (8.6)* D (47.7)* US 15-501 at Manns Chapel Rd. / Plaza Dr. US 15-501 at Holly Ridge Rd. Ext. / Center Driveway. US 15-501 at Polks Landing Rd. / South Driveway E (79.2)* E (71.5)* D (55.0)* D (53.3)* A (6.1) A (6.6) B (15.3) B (17.2) US 15-501 at Lystra Rd. C (24.6)* B (18.7) US 15-501 at Vickers Rd. / Briar Chapel Pkwy. C (21.4)* D (35.2)* US 15-501 at Jack Bennett Rd. B (17.2)* B (12.5)* US 15-501 at Taylor Rd. C (27.4) C (34.2) US 15-501 at Andrews Store Rd. US 15-501 at Village Way / Morris Rd. US 15-501 at Weathersfield Rd. US 15-501 at Mt. Gilead Church Rd. US 15-501 at East Cotton Rd. / Hamlet Chapel Rd. C (18.3) C (27.7)* D (50.7)* D (42.4)* B (12.8)* B (12.3) D (41.7)* C (22.6) C (29.5)* C (29.1)* US 15-501 at Bynum Rd. A (7.0) A (7.6) US 15-501 at Moore Mountain Rd. / Durham Eubanks Rd. US 15-501 at Russell Chapel Church Rd. / Proposed Chatham, Park Dr US 15-501 at Northwood High School Rd. / Russet Run US 15-501 at US 64 Bypass WB Ramps US 15-501 at US 64 Bypass EB Ramps C (23.3) C (28.2)* D (46.0)* D (50.2)* D (42.7)* D (35.9)* C (28.7) D (40.3)* B (16.3) B (18.3) * Indicates that an intersection leg is predicted to operate at an undesirable Level of Service 13

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 4. Future Superstreet Analysis 4.1 FUTURE SUPERSTREET ANALYSIS Traffic volumes were taken from the 2040 Standard Intersection Analyses and distributed to match superstreet movements. The AM and PM peak-hour turning movement volumes for the studied access drives and intersections were then calculated and analyzed for the Build Out year. The 2040 Build Out superstreet traffic volume figures are illustrated in Appendix A. 4.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Future Scenario 2-2040 with Superstreets and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange Future Scenario 2 incorporates the suggested NC 54 interchange improvements from the Obey s Creek TIA. Given the close proximity of the Mt. Carmel Church Rd/ Culbreth Rd intersection to the NC 54 interchange, a superstreet configuration would not geometrically fit. Therefore, the intersection was kept with a standard configuration. Additionally, the TIA for Williams Corner and Polks Landing suggested lane configurations at the Polks Landing Road and Lystra Road intersections. These were altered slightly to operate optimally with the superstreet intersections. A majority of the superstreet intersections operate at an acceptable LOS. A few intersections are predicted to have unacceptable side street movement delays. These intersections can be investigated in detail as development requiring changes in the intersection operations occurs. The overall levels of service and delay in seconds for this scenario are displayed in Table 5. 14

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Table 5 - Future Scenario 2-2040 with Superstreets and Upgraded NC 54 / US 15-501 Interchange Overall LOS (Delay in Seconds) Intersection 2040 Superstreet AM 2040 Superstreet PM Intersection U-Turn Intersection U-Turn US 15-501 at NC 54 WB Ramps A (7.4) - D (48.3)* - US 15-501 at NC 54 EB Ramps C (33.9)* - D (42.9)* - US 15-501 at Culbreth Rd. / Mt. Carmel Church Rd D (48.7)* - D (40.6)* - US 15-501 at Bennett Rd. C (20.9)* B (13.9) A (6.7) B (13.0) US 15-501 at Arlen Park Dr. B (11.3) B (11.8) B (12.3) B (7.7) US 15-501 at Proposed Obey s Creek Driveway C (27.8) A (5.5) C (18.0) A (7.8) US 15-501 at Market St. B (12.3) B (16.8) C (25.5) B (17.7) US 15-501 at Dogwood Acres Dr. A (8.1) # (1.1) A (6.6) # (1.1) US 15-501 at Wal-Mart Driveway. B (19.8) B (18.1) B (19.3) B (17.8) US 15-501 at Smith Level Rd. C (25.1) B (15.6) D (49.1)* B (10.0) US 15-501 at Old Lystra Rd. B (11.8) A (8.3) B (19.0) C (24.4) US 15-501 at Plaza Dr. D (41.3)* B (11.0) B (13.3) B (13.3) US 15-501 at Manns Chapel Rd. B (19.6) C (26.3)* D (36.3)* B (14.8) US 15-501 at Holly Ridge Rd Ext. / Center Driveway. A (4.3) - A (8.3) - US 15-501 at Polks Landing Rd. A (9.5) - B (10.3) - US 15-501 at South Driveway. A (7.3) - B (10.7) - US 15-501 at Lystra Rd. A (8.4) B (11.4) B (11.0) B (10.7) US 15-501 at Vickers Rd. A (4.9) # (0.4) A (5.4) # (0.5) US 15-501 at Briar Chapel Pkwy. B (10.9) # (1.9) B (13.4) # (1.5) US 15-501 at Jack Bennett Rd. A (9.8) # (1.8) A (8.5) # (2.0) US 15-501 at Taylor Rd. B (17.9) B (10.2)* B (18.7) A (4.6) US 15-501 at Andrews Store Rd. C (21.0) C (20.7) C (22.8) A (9.8) US 15-501 at Village Way B (11.8) A (5.7) B (10.8) A (8.4) US 15-501 at Morris Rd. B (11.5) B (13.7) B (10.7) A (4.0) US 15-501 at Weathersfield Rd. A (9.0) A (5.2) A (4.3) B (15.9) US 15-501 at Mt. Gilead Church Rd. B (16.9) A (5.2) B (11.0) A (8.9)* US 15-501 at East Cotton Rd. A (1.7) # (0.2) A (2.1) # (0.2) US 15-501 at Hamlet Chapel Rd. B (15.5) A (5.3) B (16.9) A (3.3) US 15-501 at Bynum Rd. A (4.5) # (0.4) A (4.7) # (0.4) US 15-501 at Durham Eubanks Rd. A (1.0) # (1.3) A (7.5) # (0.8) US 15-501 at Moore Mountain Rd. A (4.6) # (0.9) A (6.8) # (0.5) US 15-501 at Russell Chapel Church Rd. US 15-501 at Proposed Chatham Park Driveway C (20.9) # (1.6) B (13.2) # (1.0) C (20.9) B (11.0) B (17.9) A (7.4) US 15-501 at Russet Run B (11.5) B (12.2) B (13.1) B (14.3) US 15-501 at Northwood High School Rd. US 15-501 at US 64 Bypass WB Ramps B (14.1) B (14.6) B (14.9) A (7.2) C (22.3) - C (29.7) - *- US 15-501 at US 64 Bypass EB Ramps B (14.5) - B (13.9) - Indicates that an intersection leg is predicted to operate at an undesirable Level of Service 15

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 5. Guiding Principles US 15-501 in Orange and Chatham counties, is identified as a Boulevard in the NCDOT Strategic Highway Corridor Vision Plan prepared by the Transportation Planning Branch in July 2008 (https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/tpb%20%20strategic%20highway%20corridor s/strategic%20highway%20corridors%20vision%20plan.pdf). Information on the Strategic Highway Corridor initiative across the state can be found on NCDOT s website at: (https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/pages/strategichighwaycorridors.aspx). NCDOT provides recommendations for the control of access for strategic boulevards in their Strategic Highway Corridors Concept Development Report from October 2005. (https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/tpb%20%20strategic%20highway%20corridors/str ategic%20highway%20corridors%20concept%20development%20report.pdf). Relative excerpts from these reports are included in Appendix A. The Concept Development Report recommends partial control of access. This can include, but is not limited to: one driveway connection per parcel, consolidated/shared driveways, limited access to connecting and service roads, and right in/right out restrictions. For any proposed superstreet configurations, it is recommended by NCDOT Congestion Management that the minimum spacing requirements for u-turns begin at 600 from the intersection and do not exceed 1,000. Special circumstances will be accounted for on a case by case basis. Figure 4 illustrates the preferred progression for conversion of current intersections. 16

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Figure 4- Recommended Progression Sequence 17

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 6. Conclusion The Existing Analysis (2013) demonstrates that the corridor intersections are operating at acceptable levels of service. If standard intersections are maintained through 2040, with geometric and signal improvements, the corridor is predicted to operate with unacceptable levels of service around the NC 54 interchange. The other intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service but will have failing side street movements and significant queuing on the side streets. With the proposed improvements to the NC 54 interchange from the Obey s Creek TIA, operations improve at the interchange. The standard intersections along the corridor see the most improvement when US 15-501 is widened to six lanes from NC 54 to Mann s Chapel Rd. However, Synchro predicts that there will be significant delay and queuing along the side streets along the corridor. The 2040 Superstreet Analysis resulted in acceptable overall levels of service for all intersections. There were a few intersections with unacceptable delay on the side streets. Overall, superstreet intersections serve both the main-line and the side streets efficiently, and most effectively maintain the current operations with future growth. Maintaining the use of access management that already exists along the corridor will help ensure that operations stay highly functional. Incorporating geometric improvements and reducing signal phases at existing and proposed intersections as developments and redevelopments occur will help transition the US 15-501 corridor. Access management and alternative intersections will be the key to keeping US 15-501 operating efficiently both now and in the future. 18

DRAFT US 15-501 CORRIDOR STUDY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT 7. Appendix 7.1 APPENDIX A A1 Existing Scenario 1 Laneage A2 Existing Scenario 1 Traffic Volumes A3 Future Scenario 1A Laneage A4 -- Future Scenario 1B Laneage A5 Future Scenario 1C Laneage A6 Future Scenario 1A 1C Traffic Volumes A7 Future Scenario 2 Laneage A8 Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes A9 Strategic Corridor Documentation A10 Approved Development Concept Map 19

Fordham Blvd NB Ramp (NC 54) Fordham Blvd SB Ramp (NC 54) Culbreth Rd Mt Carmel Church Rd Arlen Park Dr Bennett Rd Market St Dogwood Acres Dr Smith Level Rd Smith Level Rd Old Lystra Rd Manns Chapel Rd Plaza Dr MATCH LINE A Appendix A1: Existing Scenario 1 Laneage

US 15-501 MATCH LINE A Polks Landing Rd Lystra Rd Briar Chapel Pkwy Vickers Rd Jack Bennett Rd Taylor Rd Andrews Store Rd Morris Rd Village Way Weathersfield Rd Mt. Gilead Church Rd MATCH LINE B Appendix A1: Existing Scenario 1 Laneage

MATCH LINE B Hamlet Chapel Rd East Cotton Rd Bynum Rd Moore Mountain Rd Durham Eubanks Rd Russell Chapel Church Rd Northwood High School Rd Channelized US 64 Bypass WB On-Ramp US 64 Bypass WB Off-Ramp Channelized US 64 Bypass EB Off-Ramp US 64 Bypass EB On-Ramp Appendix A1: Existing Scenario 1 Laneage

Fordham Blvd WB Ramp (NC 54) 118 (168) 281 (481) 56 (45) 2 (3) 526 (1102) Fordham Blvd EB Ramp (NC 54) 734 (1527) 47 (56) 1 (0) 300 (290) 1130 (269) 417 (108) Culbreth Rd 0 (5) 269 (283) 111 (205) 697 (1147) 220 (458) 1012 (451) 1058 (824) 514 (292) 128 (87) 18 (18) Mt Carmel Church Rd 177 (111) 70 (85) 59 (59) 60 (57) 1379 (872) 9 (21) Arlen Park Dr 71 (123) 691 (1092) 10 (9) 4 (2) 12 (14) 96 (51) Bennett Rd 118 (94) 14 (18) 5 (6) 332 (218) 439 (933) 22 (3) 5 (4) 1324 (854) 60 (94) Market St 286 (382) 46 (77) 26 (87) 428 (973) 1 (5) 16 (14) 115 (96) 1082 (572) Dogwood Acres Dr 61 (64) 4(15) 1 (0) 4 (14) 1175 (613) Smith Level Rd 14 (58) 409 (891) 6 (0) 10 (11) 0 (5) 2 (1) 3 (1) 1 (0) Smith Level Rd 64 (33) 1 (0) 243 (384) 3 (2) 277 (254) 1084 (570) 5 (1) 569 (1238) 59 (33) 0 (1) 24 (67) 40 (176) Old Lystra Rd 0 (1) 1320 (749) 108 (55) Manns Chapel Rd 56 (220) 419 (913) 45 (166) 1 (2) 51 (49) 7 (73) 59 (159) Plaza Dr 310 (117) XX AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 50 (61) 94 (58) 4 (28) 46 (152) 1066 (597) 68 (44) (XX) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes MATCH LINE A Appendix A2: Existing Scenario 1 Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 MATCH LINE A 22 (36) 580 (1094) 6 (13) Polks Landing Rd 39 (19) 21 (13) 432 (889) 131 (218) 6 (22) 1165 (746) 133 (176) 62 (91) Lystra Rd Briar Chapel Pkwy 44 (76) 455 (917) 24 (10) 2 (2) 9 (31) 1038 (592) 46 (26) 24 (16) 0 (0) 6 (10) Vickers Rd 84 (45) 0 (0) 38 (21) 463 (940) 45 (65) 0 (2) 0 (1) 22 (29) 1014 (598) 7 (11) 63 (45) 192 (162) Jack Bennett Rd 0 (1) 973 (542) 202 (109) Taylor Rd 11 (17) 1170 (647) 3 (7) 652 (1116) 5 (5) 17 (15) Andrews Store Rd 2 (5) 134 (68) 944 (552) 246 (159) 423 (972) 237 (112) 114 (83) Morris Rd 5 (16) 511 (908) 36 (132) 2 (4) 118 (136) 1 (3) 28 (30) Village Way 0 (1) 15 (5) 2 (1) 9 (7) 2 (7) 945 (480) 24 (31) 509 (939) 29 (41) 25 (51) 24 (54) Weathersfield Rd XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 947 (483) 37 (44) 142 (80) 16 (25) Mt. Gilead Church Rd 1 (3) 842 (447) 21 (17) 470 (870) 63 (123) MATCH LINE B Appendix A2: Existing Scenario 1 Traffic Volumes

MATCH LINE B Hamlet Chapel Rd 39 (29) 458 (853) 1 (3) 0 (7) 0 (3) 2 (3) East Cotton Rd 35 (19) 0 (3) 52 (36) 4 (12) 66 (40) 811 (438) 2 (7) 490 (836) 15 (33) 2 (10) 31 (22) 13 (12) Bynum Rd 0 (1) 851 (462) 8 (5) Moore Mountain Rd 9 (6) 495 (870) 1 (4) 5 (2) 3 (2) 8 (9) Durham Eubanks Rd 6 (7) 3 (3) 114 (42) 1 (1) 63 (78) 835 (477) 4 (15) Russell Chapel Church Rd 2 (1) 27 (47) 631 (905) 1 (0) 78 (32) 72 (43) 19 (32) 843 (546) Northwood High School Rd 238 (52) 489 (883) 8 (2) 5 (1) 52 (0) 4 (1) Russet Run 125 (53) 1 (0) 166 (95) 1 (1) 281 (73) 756 (530) 57 (2) US 64 Bypass WB On-Ramp 144 (194) 516 (786) 147 (51) 0 (2) 47 (61) US 64 Bypass WB Off-Ramp 77 (42) 487 (806) 1 (1) 48 (81) 948 (555) US 64 Bypass EB Off-Ramp US 64 Bypass EB On-Ramp 237 (114) 0 (1) 113 (77) 760 (523) 67 (70) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Appendix A2: Existing Scenario 1 Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Culbreth Rd Mt Carmel Church Rd SR 1994 SR 1008 Arlen Park Dr Bennett Rd SR 1913 SR 1913 MATCH LINE A Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

US 15-501 US 15-501 MATCH LINE A Market St Proposed Obey s Creek Driveway Dogwood Acres Dr SR 1962 Smith Level Road SR 1919 Walmart Driveway Smith Level Road Old Lystra Rd SR 1724 MATCH LINE B Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

US 15-501 MATCH LINE B Manns Chapel Rd SR 1532 Plaza Dr Holly Ridge Rd. Extension Williams Corner Driveway Center Driveway Polks Landing Rd Williams Corner SR 1530 Sneeden Rd Lystra Rd SR 1721 MATCH LINE C Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

US 15-501 MATCH LINE C Briar Chapel Pkwy Vickers Rd SR 1719 Jack Bennett Rd SR 1717 Taylor Rd SR 1529 Andrews Store Rd SR 1528 MATCH LINE D Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

MATCH LINE D Morris Rd SR 1527 Village Way Weathersfield Rd SR 1807 Mt. Gilead Church Rd SR 1700 Hamlet Chapel Rd SR 1525 East Cotton Rd MATCH LINE E Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

MATCH LINE E Bynum Ridge Rd SR 1713 Moore Mountain Rd Durham Eubanks Rd SR 1524 SR 1524 - SR 1708 Russell Chapel Church Rd SR 1520 Proposed Chatham Park Driveway MATCH LINE F Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

MATCH LINE F Northwood High School Rd Russet Run SR 1599 SR 1658 US 64 US 64 Appendix A3 : Future Scenario 1A Laneage

US 15-501 Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Culbreth Rd Mt Carmel Church Rd SR 1994 SR 1008 *Laneage Matches Appendix A3 from this Point to US 64 Appendix A4: Future Scenario 1B Laneage

US 15-501 Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Culbreth Rd Mt Carmel Church Rd SR 1994 SR 1008 Arlen Park Dr Bennett Rd SR 1913 SR 1913 MATCH LINE A Appendix A5: Future Scenario 1C Laneage

US 15-501 US 15-501 MATCH LINE A Market St Proposed Obey s Creek Driveway Dogwood Acres Dr SR 1962 Smith Level Road SR 1919 Walmart Driveway Smith Level Road Old Lystra Rd SR 1724 Manns Chapel Rd SR 1532 Plaza Dr *Laneage Matches Appendix A3 from this Point to US 64 Appendix A5: Future Scenario 1C Laneage

US 15-501 22 (24) 2182 (1492) 90 (167) 75 (86) 2170 (1346) 200 (216) 1707 (874) 1455 (1044) 189 (400) 580 (1057) 99 (76) 1044 (1355) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) 388 (443) 1914 (561) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) 1548 (2263) 76 (149) (130) 595 (561) 448 Culbreth Rd 157 (232) 1341 (1849) 498 (743) Mt Carmel Church Rd SR 1994 SR 1008 249 (162) 168 (157) 86 (94) 743 (410) 158 (167) 216 (199) Arlen Park Dr 132 (202) 1488 (1879) 23 (61) Bennett Rd SR 1913 SR 1913 202 (132) 23 (39) 23 (22) 61 (24) 39 (23) 168 (90) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE A Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 US 15-501 203 (118) 1576 (1251) 84 (108) 0 (2) 2035 (1450) 272 (108) 2 (0) 17 (19) 1697 (1041) 964 (640) 1056 (764) 106 (156) MATCH LINE A Market St 492 (367) 952 (1687) 235 (147) 387 (235) 10 (25) 108 (84) Obey s Creek Driveway 367 (492) 10 (10) 118 (203) 81 (120) 1125 (1682) 2 (8) Dogwood Acres Dr SR 1962 83 (83) 10 (19) Smith Level Road 249 (370) 812 (1213) 144 (251) 16 (11) 247 (80) 120 (73) 200 (153) Walmart Driveway SR 1919 380 (249) 55 (125) 700 (933) 1514 (2158) 103 (62) 0 (2) 61 (111) 108 (292) Old Lystra Rd SR 1724 XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE B Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 1948 (1080) 130 (66) 7 (28) 300 (185) 1727 (1060) 154 (139) 98 (66) 2051 (1291) 47 (26) 2080 (1334) 75 (49) MATCH LINE B Mann s Chapel Rd 422 (319) 1081 (1624) 110 (182) 2 (4) 162 (110) 173 (108) 139 (237) Plaza Rd SR 1532 418 (393) 88 (173) 185 (331) Holly Ridge Extension Driveway 126 (70) 10 (10) 25 (35) 24 (96) 1317 (2025) 65 (64) 10 (10) 50 (74) Williams Corner Driveway 46 (65) 1299 (1985) 47 (182) 11 (23) Polks Landing Rd 39 (48) Williams Corner SR 1530 51 (82) Polks Landing Rd 1088 (1861) 288 (253) 223 (278) 92 (176) Lystra Rd SR 1721 XX AM Peak Hour Volume (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE C Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 0 (2) 1947 (1137) 214 (153) 0 (2) 106 (95) 1914 (1057) 23 (75) 0 (0) 319 (292) 1777 (1115) 238 (244) 2028(1209) MATCH LINE C Briar Chapel Pkwy 163 (151) 970 (1782) 21 (52) 4 (4) 33 (41) 10 (10) 23 (25) Vickers Rd 131 (163) 10 (10) 55 (206) SR 1719 960 (1915) 88 (96) 0 (4) 96 (88) 153 (234) Jack Bennett Rd SR 1717 83 (133) 1030 (2018) Taylor Rd SR 1529 133 (83) 245 (238) 338 (489) 937 (1767) Andrews Store Rd SR 1528 489 (338) 292 (319) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE D Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

0 (6) 1635 (949) 89 (67) 1844 (1106) 90 (49) 45 (62) 1793 (158) 99 (92) 163 (148) 1573 (935) 10 (8) MATCH LINE D Morris Rd 61 (129) 1045 (1775) 123 (174) 174 (214) 4 (7) 92 (121) Village Way SR 1527 129 (112) 7 (4) 62 (76) 1099 (1878) 100 (94) 93 (100) 49 (89) Weathersfield Rd SR 1807 942 (1668) 206 (299) 299 (206) 67 (89) Mt. Gilead Church Rd SR 1700 Hamlet Chapel Rd 79 (138) 922 (1612) 8 (13) 2 (0) 13 (8) 6 (6) 8 (10) East Cotton Rd SR 1525 138 (79) 6 (6) 148 (163) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE E Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

0 (2) 1693 (1046) 24 (26) 4 (2) 88 (138) 1418 (913) 166 (106) 2 (2) 86 (110) 1615 (1027) 54 (85) MATCH LINE E 1052 (1732) 26 (57) 4 (20) 53 (48) 30 (35) Bynum Ridge Rd SR 1713 Moore Mountain Rd 29 (58) 1035 (1667) 18 (44) 2 (0) Durham Eubanks Rd SR 1524 SR 1524 - SR 1708 58 (29) 7 (8) 180 (86) 44 (18) 8 (6) 85 (54) Russell Chapel Church Rd SR 1520 99 (73) 87 (98) 66 (99) 1006 (1710) 238 (288) 238 (238) 106 (166) Proposed Chatham Park Driveway XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE F Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

300 (145) 1264 (918) 197 (220) 850 (783) 513 (261) MATCH LINE F Northwood High School Rd 234 (125) 740 (1186) 145 (332) Russet Run SR 1599 SR 1658 150 (96) 50 (10) 175 (194) 258 (145) 10 (10) 220 (196) 280 (648) 855 (930) 570 (432) 339 (613) 307 (287) 1191 (853) US 64 US 64 786 (947) 408 (596) (357) 648 (307) 287 XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Appendix A6: Future Scenario 1A - 1C Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) Culbreth Rd Mt Carmel Church Rd SR 1994 SR 1008 Arlen Park Dr Bennett Rd SR 1913 SR 1913 MATCH LINE A Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

US 15-501 US 15-501 MATCH LINE A Market St Obey s Creek Driveway Dogwood Acres Dr SR 1962 Smith Level Road SR 1919 Walmart Driveway Smith Level Road Old Lystra Rd SR 1724 MATCH LINE B Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

US 15-501 MATCH LINE B Manns Chapel Rd SR 1532 Plaza Dr Holly Ridge Rd Extension Center Driveway Polks Landing Rd SR 1530 South Driveway Polks Landing Rd Lystra Rd SR 1721 MATCH LINE C Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

US 15-501 MATCH LINE C Briar Chapel Pkwy SR 1634 Vickers Rd SR 1719 Jack Bennett Rd SR 1717 Taylor Rd SR 1529 Andrews Store Rd SR 1528 MATCH LINE D Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

MATCH LINE D Morris Rd SR 1527 Village Way Weathersfield Rd SR 1807 Mt. Gilead Church Rd SR 1700 Hamlet Chapel Rd E. Cotton Rd SR 1525 SR 1525 MATCH LINE E Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

MATCH LINE E Bynum Ridge Rd SR 1713 Moore Mountain Rd Durham Eubanks Rd SR 1524 SR 1524 - SR 1708 Russell Chapel Church Rd SR 1520 Proposed Chatham Park Driveway MATCH LINE F Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

MATCH LINE F Northwood HS Russet Run SR 1599 SR 1658 US 64 US 64 Appendix A7 : Future Scenario 2 Laneage

US 15-501 189 (400) 580 (1057) 99 (76) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) 1044 (1355) 388 (443) 1914 (561) Fordham Blvd (NC 54) 1548 (2263) 76 (149) (130) 595 (561) 448 1707 (874) 1455 (1044) 374 (366) 3162(1918) 315 (399) 1557 (2048) 498 (743) Culbreth Rd (413) 452 1117 (776) Mt Carmel Church Rd SR 1994 SR 1008 1592 (2142) 417 (319) 75 (86) 2419 (1508) 368 (373) 171 (225) 1656 (1969) 23 (61) 207 (113) 2445 (1648) Arlen Park Dr 268 (137) Bennett Rd SR 1913 (193) 248 SR 1913 1679 (1991) 225 (171) 22 (24) 2384 (1624) 113 (206) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume 118 (131) 2330 (1978) MATCH LINE A Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 US 15-501 MATCH LINE A 502 (392) 1060 (1793) 235 (147) Market St (705) 495 505 (344) Obey s Creek Driveway 203 (118) 1943 (1765) 94 (118) 1178 (1996) 377 (502) 81 (120) 1125 (1682) Dogwood Acres Dr SR 1962 (102) 85 1135 (1701) 75 (83) 17 (19) 1772 (1124) 320 (226) 1683 (1093) 369 (443) 1012 (1366) 144 (251) Smith Level Road SR 1919 (1307) 1135 567 (306) Walmart Driveway 1712 (2299) 435 (374) 964 (640) 1436 (1013) 161 (281) 108 (292) 2096 (1561) 1622 (2450) 103 (62) 169 (403) Old Lystra Rd SR 1724 2035 (1450) 272 (108) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE B Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

1100 (2013) US 15-501 MATCH LINE B 319 (345) 2309 (1563) 595 (427) 1229 (1861) 110 (182) Mann s Chapel Rd 474 (455) Plaza Rd SR 1532 (897) 691 300 (185) 2154 (1453) 242 (312) 1412 (2192) 508 (566) Holly Ridge Rd Extension 24 (96) 1317 (2146) 65 (64) 50 (74) Center Driveway 126 (70) 35 (25) 1900 (1250) 75 (49) 46 (65) 1245 (2008) 111 (172) Polks Landing Rd 39 (105) Williams Corner SR 1530 (82) 51 Polks Landing Rd 98 (41) 2026 (1251) 47 (66) 288 (253) 1296 (2090) 1948 (1080) 418 (319) 223 (278) 92 (176) Lystra Rd SR 1721 XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE C Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

US 15-501 319 (292) 2266 (1453) 238 (244) 2161 (1292) 1947 (1137) 214 (153) 153 (234) 2043 (1225) 1048 (2013) 145 (173) 106 (95) 2049 (1220) 33 (85) 33 (35) 2082 (1261) MATCH LINE C 173 (161) 997 (1807) 21 (53) Briar Chapel Pkwy 66 (76) Vickers Rd (379) 196 SR 1719 1113 (2149) 88 (96) 249 (322) Jack Bennett Rd SR 1717 83 (133) 1030 (2018) Taylor Rd SR 1529 (321) 378 1275 (2256) 133 (83) 338 (489) 937 (1767) Andrews Store Rd SR 1528 (657) 781 1229 (2086) 489 (338) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE D Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

163 (148) 1713 (1014) 16 (14) 14 (16) 1726 (1022) 1635 (949) 89 (67) 67 (89) 1934 (1155) 1844 (1106) 90 (49) 49 (89) 1937 (1206) 45 (62) 1922 (1170) 106 (96) 96 (128) 2096 (1384) MATCH LINE D 65 (136) 1137 (1896) 123(174) Morris Rd SR 1527 (192) 198 270 (342) Village Way 1199 (1972) 136 (116) 1148 (1967) 100 (94) 142 (189) Weathersfield Rd SR 1807 1009 (1757) 206 (299) 366 (295) Mt. Gilead Church Rd SR 1700 85 (144) 932 (1622) 8 (13) Hamlet Chapel Rd SR 1525 (248) 292 27 (24) E Cotton Rd SR 1525 XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume 1078 (1785) 146 (85) MATCH LINE E Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

86 (110) 1675 (1056) 61 (93) 93 (60) 1719 (1074) 1693 (1046) 24 (26) 30 (35) 1746 (1094) US 15-501 88 (138) 1519 (988) 166 (106) 106 (166) 1757 (1226) MATCH LINE E 1082 (1767) 26 (57) 83 (83) Bynum Ridge Rd SR 1713 37 (64) 1122 (1721) 18 (44) Moore Mountain Rd 137 (78) Durham Eubanks Rd SR 1524 (123) 245 SR 1524 - SR 1708 1300 (1807) 67 (37) Russell Chapel Church Rd SR 1520 (171) 186 66 (99) 1114 (1588) 238 (288) 344 (404) Park Driveway Proposed Chatham 1199 (1686) 101 (73) XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume MATCH LINE F Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

850 (783) 513 (261) 300 (145) 1414 (1041) 247 (230) 230 (206) 1672 (1159) MATCH LINE F 244 (135) 960 (1382) 145 (332) Northwood HS 488 (351) Russet Run SR 1599 (300) 375 SR 1658 1135 (1576) 200 (106) 280 (648) 855 (930) 570 (432) 339 (613) 307 (287) 1191 (853) US 64 US 64 408 (596) 786 (947) (357) 648 (307) 287 XX (XX) AM Peak Hour Volume PM Peak Hour Volume Appendix A8 : Future Scenario 2 Traffic Volumes

A9 Strategic Corridor Documentation

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITY TYPES Listed in Order of Mobility Function Adopted by the North Carolina Board of Transportation September 2, 2004 Boulevards Functional Purpose: Moderate Mobility, Low to Moderate Access AASHTO Design Classification: Arterial or Collector Posted Speed Limit: 30 mph to 55 mph US 70 east of Clayton NC 24 (Harris Boulevard) in Charlotte Control of Access: Limited, Partial, or None Traffic Signals: Allowed Driveways: Limited Control of Access - Not Allowed Partial Control of Access - One Driveway Connection per Parcel; Consolidate and/or Share Driveways and Limit Access to Connecting Streets or Service Roads; Restrict to Right-in/Right-out Cross-Section: Minimum 2 Lanes with a Median Connections: At-Grade Intersections for Major and Minor Cross Streets (Occasional Interchange at Major Crossing); Use of Acceleration and Deceleration Lanes US 74 near Ranger Cary Parkway Median Crossovers: Allowed; Minimum Spacing between All-Movement Crossovers is 2000 feet (posted speed limit of greater than 45 mph) or 1200 feet (posted speed limit of 45 mph or less) Examples: US 70 between Clayton and Smithfield, NC 55 (Holly Springs Bypass), NC 11 (Kenansville Bypass), NC 87 (Elizabethtown Bypass), US 158 (Murfreesboro Bypass), US 70 near Havelock, NC 24 (Harris Boulevard) in Charlotte, US 1 (Capital Blvd) in Raleigh, US 74 through Monroe, US 117 south of Goldsboro, US 70 east of Goldsboro, Cary Parkway, NC 132 (College Road) in Wilmington, Lochmere Drive in Cary, US 74 in Ranger

A10 Approved Development Concept Map