is being pushed by the locomotive, which reduces the number of seats in that car.

Similar documents
Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Click to edit Master title style

Regional Commuter and Intercity Passenger Rail in Arizona

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Maryland Gets to Work

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

Nashville MusicCity Star

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Introducing the Solution to LA s Airport Congestion Problem

BART Silicon Valley. Berryessa Extension Project Community Update. October 27, 2010

Top50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2007 THE U.S. AND CANADA S JUNE 2007 METRO MAGAZINE 21

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

Green Line Long-Term Investments

WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Tarrant County Projected Population Growth

Troost Corridor Transit Study

UPGRADING THE AMTRAK KEYSTONE CORRIDOR

STATE OF THE MTA SYSTEM REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT GUIDE

Station 1 OASIS RAIL TRANSIT OVERVIEW

Amtrak Fleet Strategy

Service Planning Open House

Benchmarking Efficiency for MTA Services. Citizens Budget Commission April 6 th 2011

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

DRAFT Subject to modifications

MAGAZINE S. The U.S. and. Canada s. Top 50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2003

Caltrain Late Night Service White Paper

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Stittsville OC Transpo Services

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX P

MetroExpress Improvements

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

BUS RAPID TRAN SIT. Institute of Tra nsporta tion Engineers October 17, 2013

Sponsored by. The U.S. and Canada s

The Future of Rail in Maryland. Kevin B. Quinn, Jr. Administrator

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Presentation of the Baltimore Metro System

AMERICA. rides the BUS

Appendix C: GAPS ANALYSIS

9. Downtown Transit Plan

Southern California - CHSRA

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

The Dash 9 Locomotive Pack

Expanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF ADA ACCESSIBILITY AT OLDER RAIL STATIONS SEPTA's ADAPTIVE APPROACH

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Understanding Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and Transit-Adjacent Development (TAD)

DART Capital Program Update

Metra seeks your feedback!

February 2011 Caltrain Annual Passenger Counts Key Findings

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013


CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED TRANSPORTATION AND THE TEXAS AV PROVING GROUNDS PARTNERSHIP

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

TRIMET S PARK & RIDE PROGRAM

Future of FrontRunner Final Report

Northeast Corridor New York to Philadelphia

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

KANSAS CITY STREETCAR

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

NCTCOG MOD Workshop Toyota Motor North America (TMNA) and Denton County Transit Authority (DCTA)

Green Line opens June 14

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Transcription:

Commuter rail is passenger rail service that is designed to transport large volumes of passengers over long distances in a fast and comfortable manner. The primary market for commuter rail service is usually commuters to and from city centers. However, many commuter rail lines also provide regional and all-day service. The major benefits of commuter rail service are: Common elements of commuter rail service include: Most American commuter rail trains consist of a locomotive and multiple passenger cars, but some consist of multiple self-propelled cars. Most American commuter rail systems are diesel-powered, but a few are electric-powered. Most commuter rail lines are designed to serve long distance travel; lines that range from 20 to 50 miles are most common. To provide competitive travel times, stations are spaced widely apart, typically every three to five miles and often longer. Most commuter rail stations rely heavily on park-and-ride access; thus, include parking with large facilities. Other station facilities include platforms and, depending upon boarding volumes, either simple shelters or enclosed waiting areas. They also commonly include amenities as real-time passenger information, ticket vending, and bicycle parking. Commuter rail coaches can be either single or double level. Single-level coaches can seat up to 125 passengers and bi-levels coaches can seat up to 185 passengers. Train lengths of up to 10 cars are common in major commuter rail systems and can seat over 1,500 passengers. Smaller systems often run two-car trains, which seat approximately 350 passengers. 1 Most commuter rail lines provide service from at least Monday to Saturday, and provide all-day and evening service. However, a few provide more limited peak-hour service. 1 With a two-car train, one car must be a cab car from which the train operator controls the train when it is being pushed by the locomotive, which reduces the number of seats in that car.

Commuter rail was originally established in the United States in the 1800s and early 1900s by private railroads as for-profit ventures. This model continued until after World War II, when automobile travel became more popular and commuter rail ridership began to decline. By the 1960s, most commuter rail services were no longer profitable; consequently, many shut down, and the rest were in decline. To prevent the loss of commuter rail, in many urban areas New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, and others public agencies took over loss-making commuter rail systems and began to improve them. By 1989, all commuter rail systems were in public hands. While cities that still had commuter rail were preserving, improving, and expanding it, there was also renewed interest in restoring commuter rail in areas that had lost it and building lines in newly emerging cities and urban areas. The first new commuter rail line was Tri-Rail in Miami in 1987; today, approximately 25 U.S. cities have commuter rail service. Of the new commuter rail areas, most, like Fort Worth and Dallas, have developed a single line (although some operate through the city center to provide the service of two lines). To date, only Los Angeles has developed a new system that now consists of seven lines. 2 South Florida s Tri-Rail is in the process of developing its second and third lines, and The T is developing its second line. One of the most important elements in the development of new commuter rail services is the availability of the right-of-way and track required to operate the services. Most of the older and larger commuter rail systems in the New York City area, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Boston assumed ownership of rail lines and/or trackage rights when they acquired the services from the private railroads that no longer wanted to operate them. Conversely, most new commuter rail services have been developed along lines owned by freight railroads. In these cases, the agency developing commuter rail service must either negotiate a trackage rights agreement for use of the line or purchase the line. Along lines where freight use is light, freight railroads are often willing to share track rights as an additional source of revenue or sell them entirely. However, in other cases, and especially along lines where freight use is heavy, freight railroads are either reluctant or unwilling to share their tracks due the limitations it would place on freight operations. Obtaining the rights to use freight rail lines for commuter rail service is often the most challenging aspect of service development, and in many cases, the reason it isn t done. Commuter rail services in the United States can generally be categorized into three groups: 1. There are four of these, which are in the New York area (MTA Long Island and Metro-North and New Jersey Transit), Chicago (Metra), Philadelphia 2 In Canada, Toronto has also constructed a new system.

(SEPTA), and Boston (MBTA). All of these are legacy systems that have been in continuous operation since the 1800s or early 1900s. 3 2. Most of these have been developed since the late 1980s, but a few, such as Caltrain between San Jose and San Francisco, are legacy lines. In many cases, the newly developed lines are viewed as the start of the development of a system. 3. The most successful of these is Los Angeles Metrolink, which now consists of seven lines. South Florida s Tri-Rail is now in the process of expanding to three lines, and The T is now in the process of developing its second line. The following sections describe new commuter rail lines in five growing cities: Nashville, Fort Worth, Austin, Salt Lake City, and Albuquerque. Trinity Rail Express, which operates between Fort Worth and Dallas, is an example of a commuter rail line that operates between two major cities and that is designed to serve trips in both directions. The line is 34 miles long and, including the two terminals, serves 10 stations. Service is provided through a joint venture of The T and Dallas DART. Service is provided Monday through Saturday. On weekdays, service begins at 5:00 AM and the last trip departs Dallas at 11:06 PM. Peak headways average 20 to 30 minutes, and off-peak headways vary between 60 and 120 minutes. Current weekday ridership averages 8,000 passengers. On Saturdays, trains operate every 60 to 120 minutes from 8:50 AM to 11:35 PM. The line operates on the former Rock Island railroad right-of-way, which was purchased by the cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. The cities then turned the line over to The T and DART. The TRE line is also used by four freight railroads through track use agreements, which provide an additional source of revenue for TRE. 3 The only new large system that has been developed in North America has been in Toronto. Montreal also has a large legacy system.

The T is also now in the process of developing a second line, which will be called TEXRail and will operate between Fort Worth and Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. This line is scheduled to open in 2018. It is anticipated that the line will provide more frequent service for longer hours than TRE, with both Saturday and Sunday service. Although most U.S. commuter rail systems provide diesel-hauled locomotive service (a diesel locomotive that pulls or pushes unpowered rail cars), TEXRail will use Diesel Multiple Units, or DMUs, which are self-propelled diesel powered rail cars. DMUs, in many respects, are a hybrid of commuter rail and light

rail vehicles, especially in terms of exterior appearance and interior configuration. (Similar vehicles are also used by the Denton County, TX A-Train service.) The Regional Transportation Authority of Middle Tennessee s (RTA) Music City Star operates between Lebanon and Nashville and began service in 2006. The line is 32 miles long and has six stations. Service is much more limited than on most commuter rail lines and, as a result, is more commuter-oriented. Service operates only on weekdays and, with the exception of one Friday evening round trip, only operates during peak periods. Monday through Thursday, there are three inbound and outbound trips during the AM and PM peaks, and no midday or evening service. On Fridays, the same service is provided as on Mondays through Thursdays, plus an inbound trip that arrives in Nashville at 7:30 PM and an outbound trip that departs at 10:30 PM. Ridership averages 1,000 passengers per day. Service operates entirely along tracks owned by the Nashville & Eastern Railroad (NERR) and is operated by NERR under contract to RTA. NERR also operates freight service along the line. The development of the Music City Star was unique in a number of respects. First, freight service volumes were low, and the freight operator was willing to operate commuter service. Second, the capital improvements that were needed to provide passenger service stations, crossing upgrades, and limited bridge replacement were modest. Third, second-hand equipment was procured from Amtrak and Chicago s Metra to operate the service.

Austin s Capital Metro provides Capital MetroRail commuter rail service between Leander in Austin s northern suburbs and downtown Austin. The line, which began service in 2010, is 32 miles long, serves nine stations, and carries approximately 2,500 passengers per weekday. There are park-and-ride lots at only three of the stations. Service operates Monday through Saturday. On Monday through Thursday, service operates from 5:00 AM to 6:30 PM (last departure from Austin), approximately every 30 minutes during peak periods and every 60 minutes during the midday. On Fridays, there is also evening service, which operates hourly until 12:30 AM. On Saturdays, there is only evening service to all stations except Leander (the outermost station), which operates approximately every 35 minutes from 4:00 PM to midnight. Capital MetroRail service is provided with DMUs; as mentioned above, DMUs are, in many respects, a combination of commuter rail and light rail vehicles. Outside of downtown, MetroRail operates in a freight rail right-of-way; within downtown Austin, MetroRail operates in exclusive lanes on arterial streets. This is common for light rail service, but unusual for commuter rail.

FrontRunner service, which is provided by the Utah Transit Authority (UTA), operates between Pleasant View (north of Ogden) to Provo, via Salt Lake City. The line was developed in two parts, starting with the northern half in 2006 and adding the southern half in 2012. In many respects, FrontRunner service consists of two lines that operate as one. The total length of the line is 88 miles and there are 15 stations. FrontRunner service operates Monday through Saturday. On weekdays, service begins at 5:00 AM and the last train departs at 11:09 PM. Service operates approximately every 30 minutes during peak periods and every 60 minutes during the rest of the day. On Saturdays, service operates approximately hourly from 7:45 AM to 1:05 AM. Ridership is approximately 16,000 passengers per weekday. FrontRunner service operates for most of its length within Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way, on separate tracks that were constructed parallel to the existing freight tracks. The only portion where service operates on shared tracks is along the northernmost six miles.

The New Mexico Rail Runner Express, which is operated by the New Mexico Department of Transportation and the Rio Metro Regional Transit District, provides commuter rail service between Santa Fe and Belen via Albuquerque. Phase 1 service, which operated between Belen (35 miles south of Albuquerque) and Bernalillo (18 miles north), began in 2006. Service was extended further north to Santa Fe in 2008. The line is 97 miles long and has 15 stations. Similar to Salt Lake City s FrontRunner, the Rail Runner also consists of two lines that operate as one. Service operates seven days a week. On weekdays, there are 11 trips in each direction that operate between 4:32 AM and 9:00 PM (last departure). These consist of a combination of local and express trips, including two that only operate between Albuquerque and Santa Fe and two that only operate between Belen and Santa Fe. Weekday ridership averages approximately 4,000 passengers. Saturday trains are scattered throughout the day, with six trains in each direction between 7:28 AM and 10:33 PM. As on weekdays, not all trains operate the full length of the route. On Sundays, there are only three northbound trains and four southbound trains.

Service between Belen and Albuquerque operates along a former Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) freight line. The state initially intended to negotiate trackage rights for the line, but ultimately, to ensure the provision of reliable passenger service, agreed to purchase the entire line from Belen to the Colorado border. This line is used for service between Belen and Bernalillo, and some freight traffic continues to operate along the line. The extension from Belen and Bernalillo operates along a combination of former Santa Fe Southern and newly constructed right-of-way, with the newly constructed right-of-way designed to straighten curves to provide faster operating speeds. This right-of-way is also owned by the state. BNSF has trackage rights along the southern half of the extension, and Santa Fe Southern has trackage rights along a short portion of the right-of-way leading into Santa Fe. Through this planning effort and others, Tarrant County residents have expressed a strong desire for the development of new rail service, with frequently mentioned services including improvements to existing TRE service, new service to the southwest, to Johnson County, and Denton County, and high speed rail to Dallas and beyond. It is important to note that high speed rail would be much more of an intercity service than local transit and beyond the scope of what The T could lead without significant partnerships. Of these, the greatest potential over the next 20 years appears to be for improvements to existing TRE service and the development of service to the southwest and to Denton County. Based on current population and employment projections, although southern portions of Fort Worth and Johnson County are growing rapidly, travel volumes between these areas and downtown Fort Worth will still not be sufficiently high to support commuter rail.

As described above, TRE service is provided Monday through Saturday. Weekday service begins at 5:00 AM and the last trip departs from Dallas at 11:06 PM. Peak headways average 20 to 30 minutes and offpeak headways vary between 60 and 120 minutes. Saturday service operates every 60 to 120 minutes from 8:50 AM to 11:35 PM. Potential improvements include: More frequent weekday off-peak service, mostly likely in the range of every 60 minutes. Later weekday service, with the last trains leaving around midnight. Hourly service on Saturdays, and later service. Sunday service. Final service levels for TEXRail have not yet been set but are anticipated to be approximately every 30 minutes during peak periods and every 60 minutes during off-peak periods. There will also be Saturday and Sunday service. These service levels will be closer to those described above for improved TRE service; however, as planning for the new service progresses, additional frequency and span improvements could be considered. TEXRail was originally planned to include a southwest leg between Summer Creek near the intersection of Old Granbury Road and Chisholm Trail Parkway (CTP) and downtown Fort Worth. Primarily for cost reasons, TEXRail is now proceeding without that leg. However, as The T continues to expand, that service remains a future option.

The Denton County Transit Authority (DCTA) has begun to consider rail service between Denton County and Fort Worth as part of its long-range planning. Although this planning is still very preliminary, such a line would most likely use the TEXRail alignment north from downtown Fort Worth and then branch north along the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad right-of-way to Denton County via Watauga and Keller.