APBF-DEC Heavy Duty NOx Adsorber/DPF Project: Heavy Duty Linehaul Platform Project Update 9 th Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction Conference Newport, Rhode Island, 24-28 August 23 Prepared by Mike May Technical Specialist, Performance and Emissions Chicago Technical Center, Ricardo Inc. G75 1
Project Sponsors - U.S. Department of Energy - National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Oak Ridge National Laboratory - American Chemistry Council - American Petroleum Institute - California Air Resources Board - Engine Manufacturers Association - Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association - South Coast Air Quality Management District G75 2
Objectives Design and build engine and emissions control system to permit regeneration and desulfurization under transient and steady state conditions. Demonstrate the emissions potential of advanced fuel, engines and emissions control systems over the Heavy Duty transient cycle and under steady state conditions. Target is to achieve the 27-21 Heavy Duty emissions standards of.2g/bhp.h NOx and.1g/bhp.h particulate matter (PM) over the transient test cycle. Evaluate effect of fuel sulfur level on engine and emissions control system performance, emissions and fuel economy and, in particular, effect on catalyst durability. G75 3
Program Approach Both single and dual NOx adsorber approaches were evaluated. Engine control and aftertreatment systems were built and developed: Single adsorber system, engine lean/rich cycling to regenerate adsorber Dual adsorber system, alternately adsorbs NOx in one adsorber while regenerating the other using fuel injected upstream of the catalyst Baseline engine engine out emissions were measured. Aging tests are being performed on the single adsorber. The catalyst system was aged for 3 hours on 15ppm sulfur fuel with performance evaluations every 5 hours. Aging over 13-mode steady-state cycle Performance evaluations consist of FTP cycles and ESC 13 mode tests. Total of 2 hours aging on a 15ppm sulfur fuel will be run, with performance evaluations every 1 hours initially then 25 hours. New catalysts will then be installed and 3 hours aging on 8ppm sulfur fuel conducted with performance evaluations every 5 hours. G75 4
Engine Engine supplied by Cummins is an ISX, 15 liter, DOHC, 4 valves/cylinder, central unit injector Rated at 475-5 hp, 165 lb.ft torque Fitted with EGR system, compliant with 22/24 standards Cummins is also supplying engineering support to interface to the control system G75 5
Aftertreatment System Layout NOx Sensor DPF LNT NOx Sensor boost bypass DOC DOC DPF LNT Single NOx adsorber system uses dual DPF/ LNT to reduce back pressure, exhaust flows through both DPF/LNT units at all times Total catalyst and DPF volume 118 liters, 7.9x engine swept volume, scope for volume reduction by: reducing engine out NOx to reduce LNT volume required increasing tolerance of engine to back pressure tradeoff of regeneration frequency with fuel consumption penalty depending on aging results In-pipe injectors used for full load regeneration and desulfation G75 6
NOx Adsorber / DPF System G75 7
Secondary Fuel System G75 8
Control System System requirements: Control engine during rich operation, Cummins ECM controls engine during lean operation Govern/oversee regeneration process, ensuring flexibility during system development Control the ECS hardware, enabling both steady state and transient testing G75 9
Control System Hardware and user interface for lean/rich cycling assessment. G75 1
Steady State Engine Operation Lean/rich cycling at 18 rpm, 8 Nm 5 45 4 2 1.6 1.2 NOx [ppm], Trapping [%] 35 3 25 2 15 1 5.8.4 -.4 -.8-1.2-1.6 Lambda [-] -2 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 36 38 Time [s] NOxLNTout NOxLNTin Nox Trap% Lambda G75 11
Hot Start Transient FTP Cycle - Aged Adsorbers, Partially Sulfated Overall NOx absorber efficiency around 94% 1 2 NOx [ppm],trapping [%] 8 6 4 2-2 -3 2 4 6 8 1 12 1-1 Lambda [-] -2 Time [sx1] NOx_EngineOut NOx_TailPipe Nox Trap% Lamda -4 G75 12
Cold Start FTP Cycle Exhaust Temperatures 6 5 Temperature [degc] 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 Time [s x1] Exhaust Pipe DOC In DOC Out DPF In DPF Out LNT In LNT Out G75 13
Cold Start Transient FTP Cycle - Aged Adsorbers, Partially Sulfated Overall NOx absorber efficiency around 8% 1 2 NOx [ppm], Trapping [%] 8 6 4 2-2 -3 2 4 6 8 1 12 1-1 Lambda [-] -2 Time [sx1] NOx_EngineOut NOx_TailPipe Nox Trap% Lambda -4 G75 14
Transient FTP Cycle Results Aged Adsorbers, Partially Sulfated 23 22 BSFC [g/hp.h] 21 2 19..1.2.3.4.5 NOx Emissions [g/hp.h] Baseline emissions with high back pressure: NOx 2.2 g/hp.h, BSFC 199 g/hp.h G75 15
Desulfation Desulfation run by engine throttling at 11 RPM, 11 Nm, close to an air fuel ratio of λ=1 Secondary fuel injection upstream of the DPF to achieve target λ of.85 to.95 7 C LNT bed temperature used as max temperature limit Sulfur evolution monitored by mass spectrometer. Most sulfur emitted from NOx adsorber as H 2 S Clean up DOC very effective at conversion of H 2 S to SO 2 Note: Traces are for different tests, sulfur loading is not the same, but data demonstrates the conversion of H 2 S Concentration [ppm] Concentration [ppm] 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Desulfation Without Clean Up Catalyst Desulfation With Clean Up Catalyst 2 4 6 8 1 12 Time (seconds) G75 16 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Cumulative Mass [g] Cumulative Mass [g] H2S ppm SO2 x1 g SO2 x1 ppm H2S g SO2 ppm H2S ppm SO2 g H2S g
Preliminary Aging Results To Date 1.2 Preliminary FTP Cycle Results NOx Adsorber Aging on 15ppm Fuel Composite (1/7 cold cycle +6/7 hot) 1 1 95 NOx [g/hp.h].8.6.4.2 9 85 8 75 Raw NOx Conversion [%] 7 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Aging [hours] NOx g/hp.h Raw NOxConversion % Partial Desulfation at 25 hours G75 17
Concluding Remarks This program has demonstrated that NOx adsorbers are capable of high NOx conversion efficiency (>9%),with a fuel consumption penalty of around 7% (excluding back pressure). Cold start FTP NOx conversion up to 8% is achieved, aided by incylinder secondary injection to heat the catalysts. The aging phase of this program is currently underway and this will provide valuable data on the effect of fuel sulfur and desulfation on catalyst performance. Issues such as: Effect of lean rich cycling on engine durability, driveability Aftertreatment system cost, packaging on vehicle Full useful life emission control system durability (435, miles) are not currently part of this program but will need to be addressed before the feasibility of NOx adsorbers can be determined. G75 18
Concluding Remarks Further development is required to reduce the fuel consumption penalty and the HC slip (mainly composed of methane). A significant improvement is expected with the additional control capabilities a common rail fuel system would provide. The elevated temperatures experienced in the ESC and NTE portions of the Heavy Duty certification will present a significant challenge to maintaining high adsorber efficiency. Additional testing needs to be done to ensure compliance with all portions of the certification test. Desulfation of the NOx adsorber in this program is conducted under steady state engine operating conditions. Sophisticated control will be required to enable desulfation at a wide range of engine conditions suitable for normal vehicle operation. G75 19