TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

Similar documents
2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Construction Realty Co.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Prepared for: Ontario Inc. CHICKADEE GROVE COMMUNITY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION OPINION LETTER

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOURTH STREET NEAR BEDFORD HIGHWAY SUBMITTED BY: LYDON LYNCH ARCHITECTS

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation Engineers

Costco Gasoline Fuel Station Transportation Characteristics

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

City of Janesville Rock County, Wisconsin September 25, 2017

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development (Watson Parkway North - Starwood Drive Node, City of Guelph)

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

LCPS Valley Service Center

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

4/2/18 MP NORTHPOINT MALL GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

MEMORANDUM. Project Description. Operational Trip Generation. Construction Trip Generation. Date: August 12, 2014 TG: To: From: Subject:

and Members of Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Mewburn Road Speed Control Review

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

Traffic Engineering Study

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Public Information Workshop

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

4 Circulation & Transportation

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT MOUNT EDEN ROAD, MOUNT EDEN

Energy Technical Memorandum

RE: 67/71 Marquette Avenue Redevelopment Transportation Overview

Existing Traffic Conditions

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

MANHATTAN VILLAGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

4131 Chain Bridge Road

Chevy Chase Lake. Preliminary Plan # B TRAFFIC STATEMENT. Prepared for: Chevy Chase Land Company & Bozzuto Development Company

East Stockton Boulevard (South Sacramento) Costco Gasoline Expansion Fuel Station Expansion Trip Generation Estimate

December 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701

Transcription:

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: David J. Decker Decker Properties, Inc. 5950 Seminole Centre Ct. Suite 200 Madison, Wisconsin 53711 608-663-1218 Fax: 608-663-1226 www.klengineering.com From: Mike Scarmon, P.E., PTOE KL Engineering, Inc. Date: September 30, 2015 Subject: Catalina Crossing Apartments Traffic Impact Study City of Madison, Wisconsin Executive Summary Statement This traffic impact study concludes the existing facilities within the Secret Places Neighborhood are expected to adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the Catalina Crossing Apartments. No physical improvements are recommended as a result of this study. The study was completed using nationally recognized traffic engineering practices established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and was in consultation with City of Madison Traffic Engineering staff in accordance with their recommended process. Part A: Introduction Purpose of Memo This memo evaluates the traffic impacts of the proposed Catalina Crossing Apartments development in Madison, Wisconsin. Discussion of traffic impacts is focused on the interaction between projected trips generated by the development and the local roads of the surrounding Secret Places Neighborhood. This memo also evaluates the Catalina Crossing site plan proposed internal circulation and driveway locations, in relation to trip distribution. Development Background The proposed Catalina Crossing development owned by Decker Properties, Inc. is located at 4525 Secret Garden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin. The proposed development covers approximately 13 acres and consists of 16 buildings, with 113 total units containing a range of 1-3 bedrooms each. The two proposed driveways accessing the development are located on Catalina Parkway, one on either side of Bautista Drive. A site plan is included in Appendix A. The proposed development is located on the north end of the Secret Places Neighborhood, which consists mainly of single-family detached housing, connected by green spaces and walkways throughout. As of January 2015, the property containing the proposed development was zoned as a Suburban Residential Varied District 2, which allows for permitted and conditional development of multi-family housing. Part B: Traffic Analysis Background Traffic Hourly traffic counts were completed on three local roads within the Secret Places Neighborhood by KL Engineering, Inc. in September 2015. These counts were collected approximately 100 feet north of Siggelkow Road at the entrance to the neighborhood. Average 1

Technical Memorandum Catalina Crossing Apartments Traffic Study weekday traffic (AWT) volumes were collected based on 72-hour counts from 12:00 AM Tuesday through 11:59 PM Thursday. The counts show an Average Weekday Traffic Volume (AWT) of: Approximately 1,600 veh/day on Carncross Drive Approximately 930 veh/day on Canyon Parkway Approximately 625 veh/day on Catalina Parkway Trip Generation Trips generated by the proposed development were determined using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition. A trip is defined as a single or one-directional movement, with either the origin or destination of the trip being from the proposed development. The trip generation category from the ITE Manual was Low-Rise Apartment (Land Use 221). Based on the ITE Manual, the Catalina Crossing development is projected to generate approximately 745 trips on an average weekday half entering and half exiting the development. Approximately 58 of these trips are anticipated to occur during the AM peak hour (12 entering and 46 exiting), and approximately 70 trips are anticipated to occur during the PM peak hour (45 entering and 25 exiting). The trip generation data is summarized in the table below. Time of Day Catalina Crossing Apartments ITE Land Use Category 221 (Low Rise Apartments) Independent Variable Rate Total Trips Base Trip Generation Entering % Entering Trips Exiting % Exiting Trips Average Weekday Trips 6.59 745 50% 373 50% 372 AM Peak Hour 113 Dwelling 0.51 58 20% 12 80% 46 Units PM Peak Hour 0.62 70 64% 45 36% 25 Trip Distribution Vehicles entering and exiting the proposed development will use local neighborhood roads to access Siggelkow Road to the south. Three possible routes exist to accomplish this: Secret Garden Drive and Carncross Drive; Bautista Drive and Canyon Parkway; and Catalina Parkway. It is expected that the majority of trips (approximately 80%) will use Catalina Parkway, because of its direct access to Siggelkow Road with the fewest number of turns, stops, and traffic calming devices. The remaining trips are expected to be split evenly between the other two routes. This distribution results in approximately 600 additional trips per day on Catalina Parkway, 46 of which are estimated to occur during the AM peak hour and 56 of which are estimated to occur during the PM peak hour. Approximately 75 additional trips per day are expected on Secret Garden Drive, Bautista Drive, Carncross Drive, and Canyon Parkway, with fewer than 10 additional trips expected during each peak hour. The projected trip distribution is shown in Appendix B. The Marsh Road Neighborhood Plan, adopted in 1999, shows a planned connection between Catalina Parkway and Beegs Road, ultimately accessing Marsh Road. When completed, this connection will alleviate some of the traffic on Catalina Parkway south of the proposed development, and result in greater mobility of vehicles throughout the neighborhood. 2

Technical Memorandum Catalina Crossing Apartments Traffic Study Impacts on Local Roads The traffic generated by the proposed development is expected to have the greatest impact on Catalina Parkway. The projected development traffic added to the observed existing traffic results in approximately 1,225 vehicles per day at this location, approximately double the traffic that currently exists. This is approximately 375 vehicles per day fewer than currently use Carncross Drive, and 300 vehicles per day more than use Canyon Parkway. Catalina Parkway has a greater roadway width (40 feet) compared to Secret Garden Drive and Bautista Drive (32 feet). The wider roadway width, along with the limited number of required stops and turns, makes Catalina Parkway the preferred route for vehicles exiting the proposed apartments. Additional traffic generated by future single-family housing on Catalina Parkway is expected to further increase traffic; however traffic volumes on Catalina Parkway are expected to maintain levels which can be reasonably accommodated, and all neighborhood roads are expected to function acceptably. The proposed development is expected to have a lesser impact on the other roadways within the neighborhood. The 75 additional daily trips on each route equate to a small percentage of existing traffic, and not expected to significantly impact traffic operations at these locations. In addition to the traffic operations on local roads, safety is a major factor when considering impacts of the proposed development. The surrounding neighborhood contains families with children, in addition to Secret Places Park and several green spaces connected by neighborhood pathways and sidewalks. The projected traffic volumes discussed above equate to approximately one additional vehicle per minute during the busiest period (PM peak hour). This additional traffic volume is not anticipated to have a negative impact on the crash potential on existing roadways. Traffic calming measures, including traffic circles and raised center islands are currently in use. A map of existing traffic control and calming measures is shown in Appendix C. Siggelkow Road Impacts Nearly all of the vehicles accessing the proposed development will use Siggelkow Road. Siggelkow road is an east-west roadway located south of the Secret Places Neighborhood that is classified by the Madison Area Transportation Planning Board as an urban collector transitioning into a minor arterial west of Holscher Road. Siggelkow Road is a four-lane divided roadway west of the Canyon Parkway intersection, a two-lane divided roadway between Canyon Parkway and Catalina parkway, and a two-lane undivided roadway east of Catalina Parkway. The most recent publicly available traffic volume data on Siggelkow Road is from 2009. It indicates an AWT of approximately 5,200 vehicles per day between Marsh Road and Holscher Road and an AWT of 1,275 vehicles per day east of Catalina Parkway. Additional traffic on Siggelkow Road generated by the proposed development is expected to be approximately 745 vehicles per day. The intersections of neighborhood roads with Siggelkow Road are expected to sufficiently accommodate these additional trips, because the critical turning movements will be right turns exiting and left turns into the neighborhood. These turning movements are expected to experience little traffic conflict due to the lack of traffic generators to the east. Left turns into the neighborhood all have adequate left turn storage lanes to remove them from through lanes while waiting for a gap in oncoming traffic. The future level of service on Siggelkow Road will likely be dictated by the all-way stop controlled intersection at Marsh Road. Additional sources of increased traffic on Siggelkow 3

Technical Memorandum Catalina Crossing Apartments Traffic Study Road are expected to affect this intersection and traffic operations in the area. These sources of additional traffic include background traffic growth, ongoing development within Secret Places Neighborhood, and the planned Juniper Ridge development south of Siggelkow Road. Further analysis of projected traffic generators and Siggelkow Road facilities would be necessary to determine the overall impact of this added traffic on future operations of the roadway. A detailed analysis of Siggelkow Road and its intersections is not within the scope of this study, so no additional data collection or traffic analysis was completed. Part C: Site Plan Evaluation The proposed site plan for the Catalina Crossing Apartments was evaluated for traffic impacts on the surrounding neighborhood roads. The location of driveways accessing the development was evaluated and deemed appropriate. Because Catalina Parkway is the preferred route for vehicles to travel through the neighborhood, it is preferred that the driveways access Catalina Parkway directly. It is also preferred that the driveways form T intersections with Catalina Parkway, to encourage drivers to turn onto Catalina Parkway and avoid traveling on narrower, more indirect roads. Internal circulation within the proposed site plan was also evaluated. The north driveway is the closest driveway for 54% (137 of 252) of the parking spaces within the development, although the majority of vehicles are expected to use Catalina Parkway to access Siggelkow Road. This will likely cause some motorists to gravitate to the south driveway when entering or exiting the development. Internal circulation allows adequate travel routes to each driveway. This is expected to result in a well-balanced distribution of vehicles between the driveways and efficient overall operations within the development and at the driveways. Part D: Conclusions The proposed Catalina Crossing Apartments development in Madison, Wisconsin has been evaluated for traffic impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. The impacts are summarized as follows: Trip Generation and Distribution: Expected trip generation of approximately 745 vehicle trips per day 600 vehicles per day are expected to use Catalina Parkway. Traffic Impacts: Catalina Parkway is the preferred route for the generated traffic to enter and exit the neighborhood Catalina Parkway and other local roads are expected to safely and efficiently accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed development Intersections with Siggelkow Road also expected to operate acceptably. Site Plan Evaluation: The proposed site plan for the Catalina Crossing Apartments provides adequate internal circulation and proper driveway locations to promote efficient access and use of local roads. The existing facilities within the Secret Places Neighborhood are expected to adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the Catalina Crossing Apartments. No physical improvements are recommended as a result of this study. 4

APPENDIX A Site Plan

N O TE: L A N D S C A P E & S IT E L IG H T IN G E L E M E N T S S H O W N F O R G R A P H IC P U R P O S E S O N L Y. R E F E R T O C IV IL, L A N D S C A P E, A N D S IT E L IG H T IN G D R A W IN G S F O R M O R E IN F O R M A T IO N. 14-1103 JL A P R O JE C T N U M B E R : D E C K E R P R O P E R T IE S, IN C. C A T A L IN A C R O S S IN G APARTM ENTS PRO G RESS D O CU M EN TS T h e s e d o c u m e n ts re fle c t p r o g r e s s a n d in te n t a n d m a y b e s u b je c t t o c h a n g e, in c lu d in g a d d itio n a l d e ta il. T h e s e a re n o t fin a l c o n s tru c tio n d o c u m e n ts a n d s h o u ld n o t b e u s e d fo r fin a l b id d in g o r c o n s t ru c tio n - r e la te d p u rp o s e s. D A T E O F IS S U A N C E 2 4 JU N E 2 0 1 5 R e v is io n S c h e d u le M a rk D e s c rip t io n D a te S H E E T T IT L E O VERALL M A STERPLA N SH EET N U M BER ASP-100

APPENDIX B Development Trip Distribution

Proposed Development Pkwy Catalina P 10% 10% 80% 75 Trips/Day 75 Trips/Day 600 Trips/Day Projected Trip Generation Catalina Crossing Apartments Traffic Study Appendix B

APPENDIX C Existing Neighborhood Traffic Control

Proposed Development Pkwy Catalina P Legend Stop Controlled Intersection Traffic Calming Circle Pedestrian Refuge Islands Speed Control Bump Existing Neighborhood Traffic Control Catalina Crossing Apartments Traffic Study Appendix C